question
stringlengths 12
377
| feedback
listlengths 1
1
|
|---|---|
What type of payment method allows users to borrow money from the issuer to make purchases, often with interest rates and fees applied?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"credit cards\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"credit cards\". The question should not contain the text \"credit cards\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of payment method allows users to borrow money from the issuer to make purchases, often with interest rates and fees applied?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is appropriately challenging for its intended purpose. It effectively prompts for an answer that discusses the nature of payment methods that extend credit, as described in the score rubric. Despite this, the question could be more complex and subtle, perhaps by focusing on the specifics of how credit cards operate, such as the implications of interest rates and fees, or the types of transactions that may be covered by such a card.\n\nIn terms of the rubric criteria, the question fits into the 'Moderate' category. It does call for a deeper understanding of the topic at hand, which includes information about borrowing money and the concept of fees and interest rates. However, it does not push into highly specialized knowledge or elaborate on multi-step problem-solving or extensive calculations as would be necessary to score in the 'Hard' or 'Very Hard' categories.\n\nHence, considering the score rubric and the complexity and specificity of the question, a score of 'Moderate' would be appropriate for the given question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the name of the pink, round, and endearing protagonist of a popular Nintendo franchise known for its copy abilities and inhaling enemies?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Kirby\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Kirby\". The question should not contain the text \"Kirby\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the name of the pink, round, and endearing protagonist of a popular Nintendo franchise known for its copy abilities and inhaling enemies?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is detailed and specific, requiring an understanding of the gaming industry and knowledge about a popular video game series. It does not directly refer to the character \"Kirby,\" adhering to the instructions, yet it's crafted to prompt a response related to \"Kirby.\" The question is not overly difficult, but it does require some specialized knowledge and the ability to think through complex game-related concepts. While it might not challenge an individual with a strong gaming background, it would pose a moderate level of difficulty for someone with a less comprehensive gaming knowledge. Therefore, in accordance with the score rubric that indicates a score of 3 for a response requiring understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations, the provided response meets these criteria. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What process occurs when an atomic nucleus splits into two or more smaller nuclei, releasing a large amount of energy in the process?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"fission\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"fission\". The question should not contain the text \"fission\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat process occurs when an atomic nucleus splits into two or more smaller nuclei, releasing a large amount of energy in the process?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]According to the score rubric, the question should be at least moderately challenging. While the question does incorporate a scientific concept, it is worded in a way that suggests a simple explanation of the atomic fission process. By reframing the question to include an assumption about the release of energy, the question loses a layer of complexity, which makes it a less challenging task than it would otherwise be. \n\nThe question posed requires an understanding of atomic physics. However, the phrasing of the question is straightforward, and the answer provided is a well-known term in the field. Hence, the question leans towards the simpler side of the challenge spectrum. Moreover, the question does not demand an extensive calculation or complex reasoning, which are necessary for a higher level of difficulty. \n\nOverall, given the limited complexity of the question, it can be concluded that it is not very challenging. It would be placed between levels 1 and 2 in the challenge spectrum, as it requires basic knowledge but doesn't involve a simple calculation. So the score is 2. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What Italian word for "time" is used in music to indicate the speed at which a piece should be played?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"tempo\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"tempo\". The question should not contain the text \"tempo\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat Italian word for \"time\" is used in music to indicate the speed at which a piece should be played?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the score rubric, this question requires a moderate level of challenge. It involves understanding a concept that involves multiple languages and applies it to a specific field, music. It requires the questioner to understand that \"tempo\" is an Italian term for time, particularly related to music, and that this term has a specific meaning in the context of a piece of music. It also requires understanding that in this context, \"tempo\" is an instruction to the musicians, indicating the speed at which a piece should be played, rather than a general term for time. Additionally, this question involves intermediate problem-solving, as it demands an understanding of the Italian language and its application to a musical context. It strikes a balance between the simplicity of the language (\"tempo\") and the complexity of the subject matter. Therefore, it is not too easy, nor too hard, making it a moderate challenge. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which river, approximately 2,320 miles long, flows from Lake Itasca in Minnesota to the Gulf of Mexico, forming part of the border between Minnesota and Wisconsin, Iowa and Illinois, and Arkansas and Tennessee?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Mississippi River\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Mississippi River\". The question should not contain the text \"Mississippi River\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich river, approximately 2,320 miles long, flows from Lake Itasca in Minnesota to the Gulf of Mexico, forming part of the border between Minnesota and Wisconsin, Iowa and Illinois, and Arkansas and Tennessee?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response successfully meets the instructions' requirements by crafting a one-sentence question that does not overtly mention the Mississippi River. It poses the query in a manner that requires inference based on a combination of details. The question is structured to prompt the reader to recall or calculate the length of a river, which flows from a certain headwaters to a specific endpoint, forming part of the boundary between certain states. These particulars make the question relatively challenging and align with a score of 4 on the rubric, as it demands a more complex understanding of geography and borders. This response effectively demonstrates the integration of several known facts to arrive at the answer. Therefore, the question is appropriate for a level of difficulty that requires a deep but not highly specialized understanding. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who is the British naturalist who is credited with developing the theory of evolution through natural selection and wrote "On the Origin of Species"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Charles Darwin\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Charles Darwin\". The question should not contain the text \"Charles Darwin\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the British naturalist who is credited with developing the theory of evolution through natural selection and wrote \"On the Origin of Species\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The provided question meets the task of generating a question with the answer \"Charles Darwin\", without explicitly stating the last name. The question is not complex and does not require extensive calculations or advanced understanding. Instead, it is a question that requires a moderate level of knowledge. The candidate must have a basic understanding of natural science and the individual's contributions to the field of evolution. This question successfully avoids stating the text \"Charles Darwin\" and instead uses a description of the person's achievements. Therefore, the question posed is well-framed and adheres to the criteria outlined in the rubric. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which novel's protagonist famously declares "I am no bird; and no net ensnares me: I am a free human being with an independent will"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Jane Eyre\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Jane Eyre\". The question should not contain the text \"Jane Eyre\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich novel's protagonist famously declares \"I am no bird; and no net ensnares me: I am a free human being with an independent will\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is crafted in an intriguing manner, prompting the reader to recall and apply a specific passage from a novel. This approach necessitates a strong grasp of literary quotations, making it a challenging task. The question avoids directly mentioning \"Jane Eyre\" yet manages to evoke the famous monologue from the book, thereby satisfying the requirement of the task. The question is well-constructed, engaging, and tests the responder's in-depth knowledge about literature, especially the works of the great English authors. It is clear that the responder has a solid command of literary references, as the question is answered correctly by providing \"Jane Eyre\" as the answer. Therefore, the question effectively adheres to the given instruction and surpasses it by prompting a response that demonstrates a deep understanding of a complex topic. Based on the score rubric, the question is challenging, as it demands advanced understanding and detailed knowledge, which is reflected in the quality of the generated response. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What type of gases are assumed to have molecules that occupy no space and have no intermolecular forces?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"ideal gases\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"ideal gases\". The question should not contain the text \"ideal gases\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of gases are assumed to have molecules that occupy no space and have no intermolecular forces?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question adequately fulfills the instruction by not mentioning \"ideal gases\" directly. It focuses on the characteristics of ideal gases instead, which are implicitly linked to the concept of ideal gases. The question asks about a type of gas, hinting that it is a gas that has molecules occupying no space and no intermolecular forces. This indicates that the gas in question does not exist in reality but is a theoretical or ideal construct, leading a knowledgeable respondent to the answer \"ideal gases\". The question is moderate in its challenge, requiring some level of understanding related to gases and intermolecular forces. \n\nHowever, the question could have possibly been more abstract or less specific about the gases to make it slightly more challenging. The current form of the question is still clear and direct enough for most readers to figure out the answer without much thought. While this is good for the intended purpose of the question, it lacks the depth that could have made the question more challenging or engaging for the reader. \n\nThus, according to the score rubric that values the complexity of the question and the depth of the answer it requires, the given response demonstrates a moderate level of complexity. It is also important to note that the level of complexity does not directly equate with the answer difficulty. The answer to the question is straightforward, but the challenge of formulating the question is moderate. \n\nTherefore, the question is well-crafted for the given instruction, but could be improved upon for greater complexity. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who wrote the poem "The Road Not Taken", which begins with the line "Two roads diverged in a yellow wood"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Robert Frost\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Robert Frost\". The question should not contain the text \"Robert Frost\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho wrote the poem \"The Road Not Taken\", which begins with the line \"Two roads diverged in a yellow wood\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is well-designed to satisfy the requirements of the task. It adheres to the instruction of not explicitly mentioning \"Robert Frost\" and is constructed to imply that the answer is the author of the poem referenced. The question is challenging, as it requires the respondent to possess a certain level of cultural knowledge around poets. It subtly demands familiarity with famous poems and their authors, making it a moderately challenging question. In conclusion, the response meets the requirements of the task and exhibits an understanding of moderately complex concepts, thus fitting the score of 3 according to the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the title character in the 2014 American action comedy film starring Justin Chon, Jorge Garcia, and Brian J. Smith?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Prince\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Prince\". The question should not contain the text \"The Prince\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the title character in the 2014 American action comedy film starring Justin Chon, Jorge Garcia, and Brian J. Smith?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented is easy to understand due to its straightforward nature. It specifically asks for identification of the main character in a movie, which is a common task associated with media knowledge. The title of the answer, \"The Prince,\" is not even implied in the question. It would require a certain level of familiarity with the specified actors and the film in question, but no complex reasoning or special calculations are involved. Hence, according to the scoring rubric, the question meets the criteria for an easy level, involving straightforward application of common knowledge. The question is also well-formulated and clearly communicates the intent, which is important for its clarity and effectiveness in eliciting a specific answer. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What positively charged subatomic particles reside in the nucleus of an atom?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"protons\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"protons\". The question should not contain the text \"protons\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat positively charged subatomic particles reside in the nucleus of an atom?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response poses a question that requires the asker to interpret 'subatomic particles' as 'protons', reflecting a moderate level of understanding. The question is formulated in a way that is likely to be understood by an audience with a basic awareness of physics and atomic structure, but it still requires the asker to apply some level of understanding to interpret the question correctly.\n\nThe question requires the asker to use more complex concepts, indicating a step towards harder problems. Although it does not explicitly involve calculations, the answer \"protons\" must be deduced, which is a form of intermediate problem-solving. \n\nThe question is structured in a way that is somewhat challenging, offering an opportunity for the asker to demonstrate an understanding of atomic structure, even if it might not be extensively tested. Hence, according to the score rubric, the question meets the criteria for a score of 3, as it requires an understanding of more complex concepts, albeit with moderate difficulty. \n\nSo the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What collection of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay was published anonymously in 1787-1788 to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Federalist Papers\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Federalist Papers\". The question should not contain the text \"The Federalist Papers\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat collection of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay was published anonymously in 1787-1788 to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question demonstrates a moderate level of complexity. It requires knowledge about historical events, names of significant figures, and the specific publishing context. The task of identifying the collection of essays promoting the ratification of the United States Constitution without explicitly naming the book indicates an intermediate understanding of the topic. This question also encourages a multi-step problem-solving process, linking historical events to the documents that influenced them. However, it falls short of being very hard because it does not require highly specialized knowledge or extensive calculations. The question is complex but not excessively so, making it a well-balanced challenge. Therefore, the score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the name of the popular animated television show that takes place in the underwater town of Bikini Bottom and features a yellow sea sponge as the main character?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"SpongeBob SquarePants\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"SpongeBob SquarePants\". The question should not contain the text \"SpongeBob SquarePants\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the name of the popular animated television show that takes place in the underwater town of Bikini Bottom and features a yellow sea sponge as the main character?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is clear, specific, and easily answerable, and therefore aligns with the criteria for a score of 2. It directly inquires about the name of a popular animated television show without having to state or reiterate \"SpongeBob SquarePants\". The task is simply to apply the common knowledge about television shows. The question is straightforward and does not require any advanced reasoning or complex calculations to deduce the correct answer. It is a question that involves a very basic level of comprehension about popular culture. This makes it an easy question to answer. Therefore, based on the score rubric, it can be concluded that the question is of an easy level. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who was the French king who built the Palace of Versailles?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Louis\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Louis\". The question should not contain the text \"Louis\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the French king who built the Palace of Versailles?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question requires knowledge about French history, but it doesn't involve an advanced level of understanding or require extensive calculations. It involves straightforward application of common knowledge. However, it is important to note that the question was framed appropriately such that it does not reveal the answer directly by mentioning \"Louis\". This ensures the challenge required from the question. The question is not too simple, but it does not challenge to an extent that it would be considered very hard in terms of the complexity of knowledge or reasoning required. The challenge is moderate, as it does not involve highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning. The feedback is consistent with the score rubric that describes the challenge level of the question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What 14th-century Italian epic poem written by Dante Alighieri is divided into three cantiche: Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Divine Comedy\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Divine Comedy\". The question should not contain the text \"Divine Comedy\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat 14th-century Italian epic poem written by Dante Alighieri is divided into three cantiche: Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question demonstrates a moderate level of difficulty, as it does not simply refer to \"Divine Comedy\" by name but instead requires the recipient to identify the trilogy of Dante's epic poem based on a description of its three main parts. The recipient would be expected to have familiarity with the poem or its content in order to correctly answer the question. It would be considered more challenging than a basic question or calculation problem, but not as advanced as a question that demanded multi-step problem-solving or expertize in a complex subject. It shows an understanding of more complex concepts, while still being comprehensible to someone with a general knowledge of literature. Therefore, the score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What organelle is often referred to as the "powerhouse" of a cell because it generates most of the energy that the cell needs to function?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Mitochondria\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Mitochondria\". The question should not contain the text \"Mitochondria\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat organelle is often referred to as the \"powerhouse\" of a cell because it generates most of the energy that the cell needs to function?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response has successfully formulated a question that requires detailed knowledge about cellular structure and function. By asking what organelle is the \"powerhouse\" of a cell, the question alludes to the function of mitochondria without using the term itself. This makes it challenging for someone with basic knowledge to answer correctly, as the answer requires understanding not just the name of the organelle, but also its role and significance in the cellular context. Furthermore, the phrasing of the question does not simply demand the naming of an organelle, but also the application of that knowledge to discuss its function. It therefore meets the requirement of scoring 4 on the difficulty scale by being a question that demands advanced understanding and detailed knowledge. The task is clearly not trivial and requires a deep engagement with cell biology concepts, making it an appropriate level of challenge for question 4. As such, this response aligns well with the criteria set in the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What conflict was sparked by the abduction of Helen of Sparta from Greece by Paris of Troy?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Trojan War\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Trojan War\". The question should not contain the text \"Trojan War\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat conflict was sparked by the abduction of Helen of Sparta from Greece by Paris of Troy?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response successfully generates a question that is challenging and requires advanced understanding and detailed knowledge. The question is framed to prompt someone to recall specific historical events surrounding the abduction of Helen of Sparta by Paris of Troy, which is a complex narrative that is central to understanding the spark of the Trojan War. It is phrased in a way that no direct reference to the term \"Trojan War\" is included, thus fulfilling the instruction requirements. The question demonstrates an intricate problem-solving approach that would require extensive research and understanding of the events leading up to the war. Therefore, according to the score rubric, this response meets the criteria for a score of 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What trigonometric function is defined as the ratio of the adjacent side to the hypotenuse of a right triangle?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"cosine\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"cosine\". The question should not contain the text \"cosine\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat trigonometric function is defined as the ratio of the adjacent side to the hypotenuse of a right triangle?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]According to the score rubric, the question presented here is moderately challenging as it requires an understanding of trigonometric concepts. It does not directly ask for the value of \"cosine\", but rather sets the stage by providing a description of a trigonometric function, leading to the understanding that \"cosine\" is the answer to the question described. While this approach can be seen as a creative and indirect way to reach the desired answer, it may not be as straightforward and direct as a question that explicitly asks for the value of \"cosine\". The question, however, correctly sets the stage by providing a definition that leads to the correct answer. So, the challenge level for this question would be 3 on the score rubric because it requires an intermediate understanding of trigonometric functions. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the part of a vehicle that typically needs to be replaced every 60,000 to 80,000 miles due to wear and tear?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"tires\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"tires\". The question should not contain the text \"tires\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the part of a vehicle that typically needs to be replaced every 60,000 to 80,000 miles due to wear and tear?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is designed to be challenging and thought-provoking, which is a primary requirement as per the instruction given. The question does not directly involve the term \"tires\", which makes it more difficult to pinpoint the correct answer. It asks about a common part of a vehicle that tends to wear out over time, which would require some degree of knowledge about vehicle maintenance. However, it doesn't explicitly ask for the part (tires) to be replaced, which could potentially mislead someone to incorrectly answer components other than tires. Therefore, it's a moderately difficult question, which might challenge someone who is not deeply familiar with vehicle maintenance. \n\nThe difficulty level of the question lies somewhere in the middle, between straightforward questions and very complex inquiries that involve extensive knowledge or calculations. It requires a basic understanding of vehicle components and the time they usually last, which is a skill not typically associated with the ability to name the answer \"tires.\" This indicates a moderate challenge level, aligning with the score 3 criteria in the rubric. \n\nNonetheless, the question does not completely satisfy the requirement of being very challenging as it may have been more taxing if it had involved a more complex reasoning process. Therefore, the question presents an intermediate level of difficulty. \n\nIn conclusion, while the question does challenge the respondent to think a little further than answering directly, it lacks a truly complex reasoning process that would make it very challenging. The question could benefit from additional layers of difficulty to further test the respondent's knowledge and problem-solving skills. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which two countries, formed in 1948, share a border along the 38th parallel and have been in a state of suspended conflict since the end of the Korean War in 1953?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"North Korea and South Korea\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"North Korea and South Korea\". The question should not contain the text \"North Korea and South Korea\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich two countries, formed in 1948, share a border along the 38th parallel and have been in a state of suspended conflict since the end of the Korean War in 1953?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented is highly challenging and requires an advanced understanding of geopolitical history, a subject that may not be easily familiar to all readers. The question subtly prompts for information that is not readily available - the specific historical event marking the formation of the two countries, as well as the ongoing conflict situation. This level of detail suggests a question tailored to individuals with a sophisticated grasp of world geopolitics. Furthermore, the phrasing of the question, \"Which two countries, formed in 1948, share a border along the 38th parallel and have been in a state of suspended conflict since the end of the Korean War in 1953?\" demonstrates a nuanced understanding of the subject matter, making it even more challenging to answer. Therefore, the response exhibits the characteristics of a very hard question according to the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Which country is home to the Taj Mahal, a mausoleum built by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in the 17th century?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"India\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"India\". The question should not contain the text \"India\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country is home to the Taj Mahal, a mausoleum built by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan in the 17th century?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided requires a moderate level of knowledge about world history and geography, specifically referencing the Taj Mahal and its historical context. The question, while not trivial, does not demand an advanced understanding or detailed knowledge, making it more on par with an intermediate level of knowledge. It requires a recognition of the Taj Mahal as a mausoleum in India, as well as an understanding that it was built by Mughal Emperor Shah Jahan. This is where the response fits most snugly within the scoring criteria. It satisfies the requirement for a question that has only one possible answer while avoiding the explicit mention of the answer itself. Thus, it fulfills the criteria and the score for this response would be 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What form of entertainment typically features a large screen, popcorn, and a darkened room?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"movies\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"movies\". The question should not contain the text \"movies\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat form of entertainment typically features a large screen, popcorn, and a darkened room?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]While the question does not directly ask about \"movies,\" it does hint sufficiently towards them by asking about a form of entertainment that closely aligns with movies. This is done through the mention of a large screen, popcorn, and a darkened room, alluding to the setting associated with movies, making the question's meaning clear for the intended recipient. The challenge of the question is just about moderate, and would be slightly easier for those with a rudimentary understanding of movie-related settings, but still it would require some recognition or knowledge of the given scenario. It doesn't demand a deep understanding of a complex topic but rather the ability to make an association based on basic information. \n\nIt also doesn't require extensive calculations or highly specialized knowledge. Instead, it asks for an intermediate level of reasoning, and as such it would score around 3, as it involves understanding a certain scenario or context that is indirectly related to the answer \"movies\". \n\nSo the overall score is 3, but with the caveat that it could have been slightly more challenging or less, depending on the specific level of understanding of the recipient. The question still manages to guide the respondent towards the correct answer, even if it doesn't explicitly ask for \"movies\". \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What devastating mid-19th-century agricultural disaster, caused by the failure of the potato crop, led to widespread poverty, starvation, and emigration from Ireland?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Irish Potato Famine\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Irish Potato Famine\". The question should not contain the text \"Irish Potato Famine\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat devastating mid-19th-century agricultural disaster, caused by the failure of the potato crop, led to widespread poverty, starvation, and emigration from Ireland?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question clearly demonstrates a high level of complexity. The phrase \"mid-19th-century agricultural disaster\" indicates a need to apply historical knowledge, and \"caused by the failure of the potato crop\" shows a requirement for understanding complex issues within agricultural fields. Furthermore, the question mentions \"widespread poverty, starvation, and emigration from Ireland,\" which suggests a demand for an advanced understanding of social and economic impacts. The question effectively avoids stating \"Irish Potato Famine\" while still ensuring that the only valid answer to it is the one-sentence answer provided. Therefore, based on the score rubric which values highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations, the response satisfies these criteria and thereby earns a score of 5. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Who was the 18th President of the United States and the Union general who accepted Robert E. Lee's surrender at Appomattox?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Ulysses Grant\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Ulysses Grant\". The question should not contain the text \"Ulysses Grant\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the 18th President of the United States and the Union general who accepted Robert E. Lee's surrender at Appomattox?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]While the sentence question presents a challenge by not explicitly naming the correct answer, \"Ulysses Grant,\" it does incorporate elements that could lead to an incorrect answer if the person asked were not familiar with the specifics of American history. The question asks about the 18th President of the United States, who was Ulysses S. Grant, not Ulysses Grant; the correct answer would be \"Ulysses S. Grant.\" Additionally, the question also asks about the Union general who accepted Lee's surrender, which is indeed Ulysses Grant, but the fact that it was a general and specifically the general who accepted Lee's surrender, rather than naming the general, makes it a more challenging question to generate correctly without using the text \"Ulysses Grant\" explicitly. As a result, due to the complexity involved in the question and the potential for incorrect answers, the question falls more into the moderate category. The ability to recognize the importance of the general without making a reference directly to Grant shows a level of understanding of more complex concepts. Hence, according to the score rubric, the question meets the criteria for a moderate challenge. \n\nSo, while the question is somewhat challenging, the response successfully formatted the output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\" and provides a question that could reasonably lead to the correct answer. The question's design subtly prompts the reader to consider specific historical figures and their roles. Despite not using the text \"Ulysses Grant,\" the question still remains a reasonable attempt to generate a question that could potentially yield the correct answer through understanding of more complex concepts. This shows a moderate challenge, aligning with a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What property of an object is a measure of its resistance to changes in its motion?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"mass\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"mass\". The question should not contain the text \"mass\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat property of an object is a measure of its resistance to changes in its motion?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question demonstrates a level of difficulty that is relatively moderate. While it doesn't require a deep understanding of complex concepts, the question does require some knowledge about the inherent characteristics of objects (in this case, motion resistance). The response provided uses this concept to formulate a question for which \"mass\" is the correct answer. It's an intermediate-level concept that requires a grasp of the role of mass in object motion. The phrasing of the question, however, is clear and straightforward, which makes it accessible and easier to understand compared to highly specialized questions. The task of identifying the correct answer is straightforward and does not involve extensive calculations. Thus, in alignment with the score rubric, the question is suitable for the level of expertise it demands. Therefore, the response has met the criteria of the score rubric effectively and warrants a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which family's patriarch was the 45th President of the United States and had several family members involved in his presidential campaign and administration?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Trump family\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Trump family\". The question should not contain the text \"Trump family\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich family's patriarch was the 45th President of the United States and had several family members involved in his presidential campaign and administration?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question requires the participant to recall and apply a broad range of global events and popular culture, which is moderately challenging but above simple knowledge. The question does not explicitly state \"Trump family,\" but it indirectly connects the answer with well-known figures and their political career. The complexity of the question is determined by the need to recognize and link several key factors related to the Trump family, thus requiring an understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What are the slow-moving rivers of ice and snow that form in high-latitude or high-altitude regions and are responsible for carving out valleys and creating lakes?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"glaciers\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"glaciers\". The question should not contain the text \"glaciers\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat are the slow-moving rivers of ice and snow that form in high-latitude or high-altitude regions and are responsible for carving out valleys and creating lakes?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided here is quite technical and specific. It involves advanced knowledge in geography and the natural sciences, inquiring about features of glaciers such as their geographical distribution, impact on the environment, and formation process. This complexity and the specific nature of the question align with a score of 5 on the rubric, because it requires specialized knowledge and complex reasoning. It demonstrates an understanding of how glaciers are not just static features of the Earth's surface but are dynamic entities that influence terrain and waterways over time. Moreover, the phrasing avoids using the word \"glaciers\" directly in the question while maintaining the central topic, thereby demonstrating a level of sophistication in the question design. Therefore, the generated question fully meets the highest standard established in the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What are the groups of three or more notes played simultaneously in music theory?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"chords\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"chords\". The question should not contain the text \"chords\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat are the groups of three or more notes played simultaneously in music theory?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided does a good job of describing a musical concept without using the word \"chords,\" which is a key element. However, it's important to consider that while the question might be challenging for someone without a basic understanding of music, a student with some background in musical theory might be able to answer it fairly easily. The question essentially requires the respondent to have knowledge of musical scales and intervals. Given that most people have at least a rudimentary grasp of musical notes, the question, although requiring some understanding of music theory, doesn't necessarily involve complex reasoning or detailed knowledge. Its difficulty hinges more on whether or not the person has a familiarity with the specific mention of \"groups of three or more notes\" played simultaneously. This aspect introduces an intermediate level of complexity. \n\nWhile it does not involve extensive calculations or advanced understanding, it does present a challenge to someone without any familiarity with music theory. It would have been difficult to come up with a question that was more straightforward but that still required a certain level of expertise. Therefore, the question falls somewhere in the middle between the extremes of extreme difficulty and extreme easy. It is a moderate challenge according to the score rubric. \n\nThe question is also open-ended, which means that while the answer is indeed \"chords,\" the phrasing of the question leaves room for different interpretations. So, while the question does indeed ask for the same concept as \"chords,\" it might not necessarily lead the respondent to use that specific term. Thus, the question is successfully avoiding the text \"chords,\" while still leading to the correct answer. \n\nConsidering these aspects, the overall score for the question is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which state is known as the "Garden State" and is home to the famous boardwalks of Atlantic City and the Jersey Shore?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"New Jersey\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"New Jersey\". The question should not contain the text \"New Jersey\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich state is known as the \"Garden State\" and is home to the famous boardwalks of Atlantic City and the Jersey Shore?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question demonstrates a moderate level of challenge. It requires knowledge of geographical features and common identifiers associated with U.S. states. The question refers to the nickname \"Garden State\" and mentions \"Atlantic City\" and \"Jersey Shore,\" all of which are associated with New Jersey but do not explicitly name the state in the question itself. This question is neither overly simple nor highly specialized, making it suitable for intermediate knowledge. Therefore, the question is neither too difficult nor too easy, meeting the requirement for a moderate challenge. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which fictional character's obsessive reading of chivalric romances led him to believe he was a knight-errant, prompting him to set out on a series of absurd and poignant adventures?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Don Quixote\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Don Quixote\". The question should not contain the text \"Don Quixote\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich fictional character's obsessive reading of chivalric romances led him to believe he was a knight-errant, prompting him to set out on a series of absurd and poignant adventures?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The provided response presents a question that exhibits moderate difficulty, which is in line with a score of 3 based on the score rubric. It involves a more complex concept—specifically, the transformation of an ordinary man into a mythical and adventurous figure. The answer to this question requires an understanding of the narrative of \"Don Quixote,\" its themes, and the character's journey. While the question could be answered by someone with a basic familiarity of the story, it encourages the interlocutor to recall more nuanced aspects of the novel, thereby facilitating a more meaningful conversation. The challenge presented by this question aligns well with the third score level, as it requires intermediate level understanding of the story. This is why, after evaluating the question's complexity, we have graded it as a 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the organ that is often referred to as the control center of the human body?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \": Brain\". The only possible answer to the question must be \": Brain\". The question should not contain the text \": Brain\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the organ that is often referred to as the control center of the human body?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question's complexity is moderate. The question is somewhat abstract and requires an understanding of the structure and functions of the body. The answer is not explicitly stated in the question and thus requires some deductive reasoning to arrive at the correct answer. The question challenges the reader's knowledge about the body's control center, but it does not demand a detailed, multi-step problem-solving effort. \n\nThe question is structured in a way that hints at the answer but doesn't explicitly state it, encouraging critical thinking. The answer is a key organ in the body, known for its importance in controlling bodily functions. However, it doesn't require an intricate understanding of advanced biological concepts or highly specialized knowledge to answer. It is also not as challenging as a question that demands extensive calculations or complex reasoning, which would place the question closer to a score of 2 or 3.\n\nIn summary, the question is moderately challenging as it requires some deductive reasoning and a general understanding of body structures. The response does not directly state the answer but instead implies the question's answer, making it more engaging for the reader. While it might not be highly specialized or exceedingly complex, it certainly is not as straightforward as a question that could be answered with basic knowledge or simple calculations. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the first black president of South Africa and a key figure in the fight against apartheid?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Nelson Mandela\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Nelson Mandela\". The question should not contain the text \"Nelson Mandela\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the first black president of South Africa and a key figure in the fight against apartheid?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]In the context of the given task, the question generated is appropriately formulated to provoke a response that identifies Nelson Mandela as the answer. It avoids explicitly mentioning his name and instead relies on the knowledge that Mandela was a significant figure in South African history and a key figure in the fight against apartheid. The question engages the reader's understanding of history and the significance of figures in human struggles. Not only does it avoid the text \"Nelson Mandela\", it also effectively communicates the expected information. The challenge of the question is adequate to demand a precise answer while still being accessible to those with an understanding of basic historical concepts. As a result, this question is suitable for the evaluation criteria set forth in the score rubric. Therefore, based on the criteria of assessing the challenge level of the question, it stands at a moderate level of complexity. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the only NFL quarterback to have won seven Super Bowl rings?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Tom Brady\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Tom Brady\". The question should not contain the text \"Tom Brady\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the only NFL quarterback to have won seven Super Bowl rings?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]According to the score rubric, the difficulty in answering the question is determined by how complex or specialized the knowledge required is. This question, while specific, might not be overly challenging as it focuses on a well-known fact about Tom Brady. The answer is straightforward and can be deduced without much advanced knowledge or reasoning. It relies on general awareness of Tom Brady's achievements. It does not require the reader to engage in a higher level of critical thinking or to employ complex understanding. Hence, this question could be classified as 'easy' or 'moderate' at best. The question could be improved by incorporating a more complex or less well-known fact about Tom Brady that requires a deeper understanding. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What was the primary objective of the 1791 uprising led by Boukman in Saint-Domingue, which ultimately resulted in the establishment of Haiti as the first independent black nation in the world?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"slave revolt\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"slave revolt\". The question should not contain the text \"slave revolt\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat was the primary objective of the 1791 uprising led by Boukman in Saint-Domingue, which ultimately resulted in the establishment of Haiti as the first independent black nation in the world?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the scoring rubric, the question presented is considered to be very hard, involving highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, and extensive calculations. The question requires a deep understanding of historical events, specifically the 1791 uprising and its significance in the formation of Haiti. Furthermore, it asks for the primary objective of this event, which would likely involve recalling specific details about the uprising, its leaders, and its consequences. Thus, the question would challenge someone with a basic knowledge of history to a great extent. While there is a question format, the content of the question is highly specialized, which aligns with the score rubric of 4 and 5, making it a very challenging question indeed. So the overall score is 4. [RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What is the number of particles (atoms or molecules) in one mole of a substance, which is a fundamental constant in chemistry and physics?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Avogadro’s number\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Avogadro’s number\". The question should not contain the text \"Avogadro’s number\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the number of particles (atoms or molecules) in one mole of a substance, which is a fundamental constant in chemistry and physics?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is appropriately challenging as it seeks to elicit knowledge of a scientific principle without explicitly mentioning \"Avogadro’s number.\" It directly addresses the number of particles in a mole and thus requires a good grasp of chemistry and physics. However, the question is not excessively difficult as it does not ask for advanced calculations or highly specialized knowledge. It focuses more on the conceptual understanding rather than intricate problem-solving. The instruction makes it clear that the question should be constructed in a way that only the desired answer can be given, which aligns well with the aim of the task to generate a question with the correct answer as \"Avogadro’s number\". Therefore, it can be concluded that the question's level of difficulty is at intermediate level. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What substances speed up chemical reactions without being consumed or altered in the process?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"catalysts\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"catalysts\". The question should not contain the text \"catalysts\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat substances speed up chemical reactions without being consumed or altered in the process?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is clearly designed to elicit a single, specific answer: \"catalysts\". It does this by asking about substances that speed up chemical reactions without being consumed or altered. The phrasing of the question subtly implies certain scientific concepts, such as the idea of chemical reactions being driven by external substances. However, it does not demand advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or complex reasoning. The question is moderately challenging, requiring some scientific knowledge but not to an extent that would be considered advanced or highly specialized. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the Russian monarch who founded the city of St. Petersburg in 1703 and ruled from 1682 to 1725?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Peter the Great\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Peter the Great\". The question should not contain the text \"Peter the Great\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the Russian monarch who founded the city of St. Petersburg in 1703 and ruled from 1682 to 1725?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented requires an intermediate level of knowledge to answer correctly. It references specific historical facts about Peter the Great, such as his rule from 1682 to 1725 and his founding of St. Petersburg in 1703. These facts are not directly related, indicating that understanding the interconnection of these events is necessary for a correct answer. Moreover, the question does not explicitly mention the phrase \"Peter the Great,\" but it does refer to the person in question through events related to them. Given these considerations, the question is not excessively difficult but aligns more with the score 3 on the rubric, as it involves the application of more complex concepts and intermediate calculations. It does not, however, lean towards the more advanced understanding or detailed knowledge that could push it into a score 4 or above. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What object, often placed on a dinner table, provides soft, warm, and gentle light, typically through the combustion of wax?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"candle\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"candle\". The question should not contain the text \"candle\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat object, often placed on a dinner table, provides soft, warm, and gentle light, typically through the combustion of wax?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is framed such that it demands an understanding of the functionalities of various objects, specifically one that produces light. The use of the terms \"soft, warm, and gentle light\", and \"combustion of wax\" introduces more complex concepts which are a step above the basic knowledge required for this task. The question, while requiring a knowledge of how candles operate, doesn't necessarily demand the use of \"highly specialized knowledge\" or \"complex reasoning\" as specified in the score rubric. The answer, \"candle\", is clear and directly aligned with the question asked, although the question itself does not explicitly mention the word \"candle\". Instead, it relies on the understanding of what constitutes a candle, thus making it more challenging than the average one-sentence question. Overall, the question and answer fit within the scope of a moderately challenging task, with room for improvement by further refining the question or providing more nuanced examples. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What Pulitzer Prize-winning novel by Harper Lee has been adapted into a successful film and stage play, and is widely regarded as a classic of modern American literature?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"To Kill a Mockingbird\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"To Kill a Mockingbird\". The question should not contain the text \"To Kill a Mockingbird\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat Pulitzer Prize-winning novel by Harper Lee has been adapted into a successful film and stage play, and is widely regarded as a classic of modern American literature?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is hard because it requires an advanced understanding of the novel's impact on American literature. It demands a detailed knowledge of the novel's successes in various adaptations, namely the film and stage play. Moreover, the question involves multi-step problem-solving by linking these adaptations to the broader context of the novel within American literary history. Thus, a high score is warranted as the question is quite complex, requiring not just a correct answer but a nuanced understanding of the novel's cultural significance. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What ancient Roman amphitheater, built in the 1st century AD, is one of the Seven Wonders of the Medieval World and is located in the center of Rome, Italy?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Colosseum\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Colosseum\". The question should not contain the text \"Colosseum\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat ancient Roman amphitheater, built in the 1st century AD, is one of the Seven Wonders of the Medieval World and is located in the center of Rome, Italy?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented in the response requires a high level of knowledge to answer accurately. It demands both cultural understanding of the Seven Wonders of the Medieval World and a historical understanding of the Colosseum specifically. Furthermore, it also requires detailed knowledge about the amphitheater's construction time, its geographical location, and its significance. While the question doesn't contain the text \"Colosseum,\" it does contain elements that would likely lead to the answer of \"Colosseum\" for someone who has an advanced understanding of history and culture. In conclusion, this question would be considered a very hard question that requires extensive research and complex reasoning. So the overall score is 5. [RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Who is the renowned theoretical physicist and cosmologist who wrote "A Brief History of Time" and was diagnosed with a motor neuron disease at age 21?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Stephen Hawking\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Stephen Hawking\". The question should not contain the text \"Stephen Hawking\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the renowned theoretical physicist and cosmologist who wrote \"A Brief History of Time\" and was diagnosed with a motor neuron disease at age 21?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated appears to be easy to answer with a straightforward application of common knowledge, hence it aligns with a score of 2 on the rubric. It effectively avoids directly mentioning \"Stephen Hawking\", while focusing on the subject's work and personal challenges. The difficulty level is aptly assessed, as the question is accessible to a wide audience with a general knowledge of science and literature, yet it requires some level of thought and recognition of important aspects of Hawking's life and work. Therefore, a score of 2 is justified, considering it meets the requirement of not mentioning the specific name but still presents a question that aids in achieving the goal of identifying \"Stephen Hawking\". \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the title of the 2021 American animated musical fantasy film produced by Walt Disney Animation Studios that tells the story of the Madrigal family and their magical gifts?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Encanto\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Encanto\". The question should not contain the text \"Encanto\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the 2021 American animated musical fantasy film produced by Walt Disney Animation Studios that tells the story of the Madrigal family and their magical gifts?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is structured to draw an answer that does not directly involve the text \"Encanto.\" It involves the application of common knowledge about the film's genre, characters, and production details. The complexity lies in the specific details and context provided, while the final step to arrive at the answer \"Encanto\" is straightforward. It requires an intermediate level of understanding of film terminology and a basic calculation of the story's elements. However, the task does not explicitly ask for the title directly, leaving some room for ambiguity. Therefore, the question has some difficulty, fitting well within a moderate challenge as described in the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which city is known as the Emerald City and is home to the iconic Space Needle?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Seattle\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Seattle\". The question should not contain the text \"Seattle\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich city is known as the Emerald City and is home to the iconic Space Needle?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question, \"Which city is known as the Emerald City and is home to the iconic Space Needle?\" is a simple one, yet it holds a clever riddle that is easy to decipher. It requires a basic understanding of a city's defining characteristics, which is common knowledge. The space between \"Emerald City\" and \"iconic Space Needle\" creates a playful challenge that only requires the answer to be \"Seattle\", fitting the instructions. However, due to the requirement of the question not containing the text \"Seattle\", the question appears to be an interesting deviation from the instruction, yet it does not violate the instruction in a significant way. Thus, the question fits well within the lower end of the rubric with an easy level of challenge, requiring a simple application of common knowledge about cities, hence aligning with the score of 2. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who wrote the play "A Streetcar Named Desire" and was known for his poetic and often disturbing portrayals of American life in the South?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Tennessee Williams\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Tennessee Williams\". The question should not contain the text \"Tennessee Williams\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho wrote the play \"A Streetcar Named Desire\" and was known for his poetic and often disturbing portrayals of American life in the South?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response given effectively creates a question that could be answered with a wide range of information from various fields. The question asks for the author of a specific play and also mentions the themes of the play. This question, while still being fairly straightforward, demands a combination of knowledge about playwrights, understanding of themes within American literature, and possibly a recall of the play \"A Streetcar Named Desire\". It does not, however, demand highly specialized knowledge nor complex reasoning. Therefore, the response does not meet the expectations of a very hard question but is indeed a moderate level question. The scoring is adjusted accordingly. \n(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the Polish composer and pianist known for his delicate and expressive nocturnes, waltzes, and preludes that are considered some of the most technically challenging and emotionally powerful in the piano repertoire?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Frédéric Chopin\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Frédéric Chopin\". The question should not contain the text \"Frédéric Chopin\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Polish composer and pianist known for his delicate and expressive nocturnes, waltzes, and preludes that are considered some of the most technically challenging and emotionally powerful in the piano repertoire?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in this response is indeed challenging, aligning well with the score of 4 given the rubric. It successfully frames a question that requires a deep understanding of classical music, an awareness of music history, and the ability to identify a specific pianist. By asking for the details of a composer's work style and emotional complexity, the question is designed to elicit the correct answer. The question also encourages the use of deductive reasoning, suggesting the answer based on the qualities described. Thus, while it is not impossible to answer the question correctly, it is considerably harder than a simple calculation or application of common knowledge. The reasoning behind the score is clear, as the question requires a sophisticated understanding of classical music, making it quite difficult but not beyond the realm of the possible. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What type of traditional Japanese poetry consists of three lines with a syllable count of 5, 7, and 5?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"haiku\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"haiku\". The question should not contain the text \"haiku\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of traditional Japanese poetry consists of three lines with a syllable count of 5, 7, and 5?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response exhibits a well-articulated question that, while not explicitly mentioning the term \"haiku,\" still covers the essential characteristics of this traditional art form. It employs a clear, structured approach by asking about the type of poetry, its structure (three lines), and the specific syllable counts required in each line (5, 7, and 5). This structured question makes it moderately challenging, requiring knowledge about Japanese poetry and the ability to recognize and describe its features. The question aligns with the intermediate level of understanding as described in the score rubric, suggesting that it is not overly complex but still requires an understanding of more intricate concepts related to haiku poetry. Therefore, the response is able to fulfill all the requirements set out in the task and the score rubric. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which South American country has a unique trapezoidal shape, with a long, narrow strip of land that stretches from the Andes Mountains to the Pacific Ocean?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Republic of Chile\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Republic of Chile\". The question should not contain the text \"Republic of Chile\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich South American country has a unique trapezoidal shape, with a long, narrow strip of land that stretches from the Andes Mountains to the Pacific Ocean?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question demonstrates a moderate challenge for answering. It is based on a geographical description, requiring a moderate level of geographical knowledge and understanding of the shapes of countries. The question does not explicitly state the name of the country, instead describes its physical characteristics, which could be considered as a form of advanced reasoning and detailed knowledge. The question involves identifying a country based on its physical features, which aligns with the criteria for a score of 3. Therefore, the response effectively meets the requirements set by the score rubric. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the main antagonist in the Harry Potter series who murdered Harry's parents and seeks to return to power?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Lord Voldemort\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Lord Voldemort\". The question should not contain the text \"Lord Voldemort\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the main antagonist in the Harry Potter series who murdered Harry's parents and seeks to return to power?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is constructed in such a way as to require knowledge of a specific literary series, namely the Harry Potter series. The question focuses on the identification of the main antagonist, which is a well-known character. While the question's formulation is correct and requires basic knowledge or understanding of a widely recognized narrative, it might not be challenging enough to warrant higher points on the rubric. Therefore, based on the score rubric's criteria, the question is considered to be 'moderate' in terms of difficulty. However, it is crucial to note that this is a subject matter-specific question and thus might vary depending on the respondent's familiarity with the literary series. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the Japanese term for the subarctic forests found in eastern Russia and northern Japan?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \": Taiga\". The only possible answer to the question must be \": Taiga\". The question should not contain the text \": Taiga\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the Japanese term for the subarctic forests found in eastern Russia and northern Japan?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The challenge level of the question is moderate. The question asks for the Japanese term for the forests described in the instruction. This question requires a certain level of understanding and recall, particularly an intermediate recognition of geographical and linguistic concepts.\n\nHowever, it's important to note that the question, while not trivial, is not overly difficult. It leans more towards cultural and geographical knowledge rather than highly specialized or complex reasoning knowledge. The answer provided in the instruction, \": Taiga,\" is the precise term needed to accurately answer the question, fulfilling the requirement for a one-sentence question with a single correct answer.\n\nWhen evaluating the question in terms of its challenge level, it would be ranked higher if the question involved more complex reasoning or a detailed multi-step problem solving. While the task requires a question to which the answer is simply \" : Taiga,\" the phrasing of the question could be more convoluted to meet the criteria for a higher score in terms of difficulty, without detracting from the uniqueness of the answer.\n\nSo, based on the score rubric, the question posed in the response is judged to require understanding of more complex concepts and intermediate level calculations, making it moderately challenging. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, and has been known for his ambitious goals such as establishing a human settlement on Mars and making humanity a multi-planetary species?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Elon Musk\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Elon Musk\". The question should not contain the text \"Elon Musk\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, and has been known for his ambitious goals such as establishing a human settlement on Mars and making humanity a multi-planetary species?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question in the response is complex and involves specific knowledge about Elon Musk's business activities and personal ambitions, thus it is challenging. It details Musk's roles as CEO of SpaceX and Tesla, and his bold projects like colonizing Mars. This complexity and detailed knowledge requirement aligns well with the score rubric's description of a score 4, which indicates a question that demands advanced understanding. While the response does a good job of capturing the essential information, it could have been framed in a question format without mentioning his name directly, making it a bit more challenging. Nonetheless, the response still meets the criteria of a multi-step problem-solving question with specialized knowledge. So the overall score is 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What type of activity combines physical exercise, mental discipline, and self-defense techniques, originating from Eastern cultures?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"martial arts\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"martial arts\". The question should not contain the text \"martial arts\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of activity combines physical exercise, mental discipline, and self-defense techniques, originating from Eastern cultures?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is quite challenging and would likely require someone with advanced knowledge in cultural and historical studies, as well as a deep understanding of physical and mental disciplines to correctly answer. The question cleverly avoids the direct mention of the term \"martial arts\" while still providing enough context to steer the respondent towards the correct answer. The query's intricacy doesn't rely on mere recognition or basic knowledge but demands an extensive understanding of various concepts intertwined with the context provided. The inclusion of \"self-defense techniques\" hints at a martial art, without explicitly stating the answer. So, based on the score rubric, which focuses on the challenge level of the question, this one would be well-aligned with a score of 5. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What geological formations are capable of producing lava flows, ash clouds, and pyroclastic flows?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"volcanoes\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"volcanoes\". The question should not contain the text \"volcanoes\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat geological formations are capable of producing lava flows, ash clouds, and pyroclastic flows?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is challenging due to its technical nature and requirement for specialized knowledge. It does not contain the word \"volcanoes\" but instead hints at it through the types of geological phenomena it mentions, like lava flows, ash clouds, and pyroclastic flows. The question assumes the understanding of the relationship between these phenomena and volcanic activity, which is not immediately apparent. The answer required is correct, but the path to arrive at it can be complex and requires advanced knowledge. Therefore, the question can be considered \"very hard\" as per the score rubric, as it demands highly specialized knowledge and complex reasoning. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What mythological creature has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a horse?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"centaur\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"centaur\". The question should not contain the text \"centaur\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat mythological creature has the upper body of a man and the lower body of a horse?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented in the response is somewhat challenging. It involves identifying a mythological creature that closely resembles a centaur, an answer that is not explicitly mentioned in the question. The question requires the recipient to apply common knowledge about the characteristics of a centaur to deduce the answer, demonstrating a moderate level of understanding and reasoning. Thus, considering the complexity of the task involved, the response meets the criteria for a score of 3. It is challenging enough to require more than basic knowledge, yet not highly specialized or in-depth complex reasoning. It strikes a balance between being moderately complex yet not overly difficult. Therefore, the score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What major civil rights goal was achieved in the United States in 1954 with the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"school desegregation\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"school desegregation\". The question should not contain the text \"school desegregation\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat major civil rights goal was achieved in the United States in 1954 with the Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question effectively asks for a significant event in American history without directly using the terms \"school desegregation\". The response requires a basic understanding of the civil rights movement and knowledge of the Supreme Court's landmark decision in the 1950s. It does not involve highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning but rather a straightforward application of common historical knowledge. This level of difficulty aligns with the score rubric, which places it under the 'Moderate' category. The question can be posed to a wide range of people, and it has the answer: \"school desegregation\". Therefore, it is a good example of a question with the answer specified, as described in the instruction. So the overall score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the protagonist of Jonathan Swift's satirical novel "Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Lemuel Gulliver\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Lemuel Gulliver\". The question should not contain the text \"Lemuel Gulliver\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the protagonist of Jonathan Swift's satirical novel \"Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question accurately challenges the interlocutor to recall information based on the title of a famous literary work, \"Travels into Several Remote Nations of the World\", without explicitly stating the character's name, thus adhering to the instruction. The challenge of identifying the protagonist is an appropriate level of complexity, effectively bridging the gap between the knowledge expected from someone familiar with well-known literature and the intermediate to advanced skills needed to answer the question. This approach engages the recipient in a thoughtful exercise that requires not just memorization but also an understanding of the themes and characters present in the novel. Therefore, the question maintains a moderate level of difficulty in aligning with the score rubric's definition of a question that requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is credited with developing the laws of motion and universal gravitation, and is often depicted in art and literature as an apple falling on his head?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Isaac Newton\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Isaac Newton\". The question should not contain the text \"Isaac Newton\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is credited with developing the laws of motion and universal gravitation, and is often depicted in art and literature as an apple falling on his head?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The task requires generating a one-sentence question with the answer \"Isaac Newton\" without containing the text \"Isaac Newton\" in the question itself. The question posed is quite challenging, as it doesn't directly mention \"Isaac Newton\". Instead, it refers to specific attributes related to Newton, such as his laws of motion and universal gravitation, and his depiction in art and literature. These attributes are not direct references to Newton but are cleverly used to imply his identity. This level of complexity reflects a higher score according to the rubric, as it demands an advanced understanding and detailed knowledge to successfully identify and name Isaac Newton. Moreover, it doesn't just require recognition, but it also demands the inference that these attributes are associated with the same individual. Therefore, while the question is indeed one sentence, its complexity and nuance do not meet the criteria for a very easy question. \n\n\n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What type of organized crime groups are responsible for the majority of illegal drug trafficking and related violence in Mexico and other parts of Central and South America?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"drug cartels\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"drug cartels\". The question should not contain the text \"drug cartels\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of organized crime groups are responsible for the majority of illegal drug trafficking and related violence in Mexico and other parts of Central and South America?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided here clearly requires a sophisticated understanding of organized crime, particularly in the realm of drug trafficking, and the intricacies involved in such a domain. It calls for an advanced knowledge base that extends beyond common knowledge and into the realms of criminal dynamics, geopolitical influences, and the complex societal impact of drug cartels. The question’s emphasis on the geographic aspect and the inter-connectedness of such crime groups in different countries further highlights its complexity. Thus, it aligns well with the score rubric's definition of a question that has a score of 5, involving highly specialized knowledge and extensive problem-solving. By contrast, a simple question that asks for the answer \"drug cartels\" without any complex understanding would not satisfy the requirements. Therefore, in this context, the given response demonstrates a high level of challenge in posing a question that meets the given task's complex requirements. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Which American poet, known for her reclusive nature and innovative style, wrote over 1,800 poems, most of which were discovered and published after her death?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Emily Dickinson\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Emily Dickinson\". The question should not contain the text \"Emily Dickinson\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich American poet, known for her reclusive nature and innovative style, wrote over 1,800 poems, most of which were discovered and published after her death?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided contains specific details about Emily Dickinson’s life and literary contributions, such as her reclusive nature, the number of her poems, and the fact that most of them were published posthumously. This approach effectively isolates the information about Emily Dickinson without directly mentioning her name. The question demonstrates a moderate level of complexity by requiring understanding of more complex biographical concepts, as well as intermediate calculations, like the count of her poems. It also encourages the application of common knowledge to generate a multi-step explanation. Therefore, it aligns with the task description that requires the answer to be \"Emily Dickinson\" but not explicitly stated within the question. Based on these considerations and the rubric criteria, the question is moderately challenging, as it requires a mix of knowledge and reasoning skills. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the largest river in the world by discharge volume, accounting for about 15% of the fresh water that flows into the oceans?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Amazon River\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Amazon River\". The question should not contain the text \"Amazon River\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the largest river in the world by discharge volume, accounting for about 15% of the fresh water that flows into the oceans?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST] This question, while seemingly related to identifying the \"Amazon River,\" focuses on a specific aspect of river classification - the \"largest river in the world by discharge volume.\" This question requires a deeper understanding of geophysics and river data analysis, making it a harder task. Additionally, the question involves a multi-step problem-solving process to deduce the answer from the provided description. The question also lacks direct reference to \"Amazon River,\" which is a part of the instruction. Despite these challenges, it's still a question where the answer can be guessed due to common knowledge about Amazon being the largest freshwater river. So it could be considered somewhere between a moderate and a hard question on the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What type of materials are created by combining a metal with one or more other elements, such as carbon, copper, or zinc, to enhance their strength, durability, or other properties?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"alloys\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"alloys\". The question should not contain the text \"alloys\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of materials are created by combining a metal with one or more other elements, such as carbon, copper, or zinc, to enhance their strength, durability, or other properties?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the instruction given, the question provided is quite complex and would require a high level of understanding of specialized topics related to materials science. It demands the identification of specific types of materials, namely alloys, without mentioning the term \"alloys\". This requires a level of expertise in the field that would make the question quite challenging for the average person to answer. In comparison to the example questions provided, this question's level of complexity is significantly higher, as it would necessitate a more advanced understanding of the chemical and physical properties of alloys, their uses, and the specific metals they are formed from. Therefore, according to the score rubric, the response demonstrates a level of difficulty that is very hard, fulfilling the criteria for the highest score. So the overall score is 5. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the title of the famous two-act ballet, originally choreographed by Marius Petipa and Lev Ivanov, with a score by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, based on E.T.A. Hoffmann's 1816 fairy tale "The Nutcracker and the Mouse King"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Nutcracker\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Nutcracker\". The question should not contain the text \"The Nutcracker\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the famous two-act ballet, originally choreographed by Marius Petipa and Lev Ivanov, with a score by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, based on E.T.A. Hoffmann's 1816 fairy tale \"The Nutcracker and the Mouse King\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated requires an intermediate understanding of ballet history, specifically the context of \"The Nutcracker\". It demonstrates more complex concepts by referencing key historical and artistic figures, such as Marius Petipa, Lev Ivanov, and Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky, as well as the source material, E.T.A. Hoffmann's story. However, it succeeds in indirectly prompting the answer \"The Nutcracker\", adhering to the task's instructions. This question would be deemed moderate because it involves some understanding of ballet, but does not overly complicate the answer required. Therefore, the response fulfills the criteria of the score rubric by requiring intermediate knowledge and skill. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the British politician who, as Prime Minister, led the United Kingdom to victory in World War II and is known for his iconic speeches, including the "We shall fight on the beaches" address?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Winston Churchill\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Winston Churchill\". The question should not contain the text \"Winston Churchill\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the British politician who, as Prime Minister, led the United Kingdom to victory in World War II and is known for his iconic speeches, including the \"We shall fight on the beaches\" address?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question involves a straightforward application of common knowledge and simple concepts, specifically regarding the historical figure, Winston Churchill. It accurately alludes to his significant roles during World War II, including his position as Prime Minister, and references one of his most famous speeches. It does not include the phrase \"Winston Churchill,\" fulfilling the requirement of the task, and the question itself is formulated in a general yet informative way. This approach makes it easy for the audience to deduce the answer while still prompting them to recall specific historical achievements. Moreover, it challenges the audience to identify the notable figure based on his impact and contributions during a major historical event. These aspects align well with the rubric's definition of a moderate level of difficulty. Therefore, considering the aspects highlighted in the rubric and the challenge posed by the response, it is evident that the question is of moderate difficulty. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What was the name of the Winter Olympics where Eileen Gu won three medals in freestyle skiing?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"2022 Beijing Olympics\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"2022 Beijing Olympics\". The question should not contain the text \"2022 Beijing Olympics\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat was the name of the Winter Olympics where Eileen Gu won three medals in freestyle skiing?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the rubric, the question presented here demonstrates a moderate level of difficulty. It does not contain the phrase \"2022 Beijing Olympics,\" fulfilling the given instruction. However, it still requires some understanding of the specific achievements of Eileen Gu and the fact that she won them at the Olympics. The challenge arises from the need to recall or infer this detail, which is not as obvious as the question's wording might suggest, hence it is not an overly easy question. It requires a mix of knowledge about the Olympics and the ability to make connections between facts, indicating a moderate difficulty level. Therefore, the response meets the criteria for a score of 3, as it strikes a balance between basic knowledge and moderate reasoning. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the ancient Macedonian king who conquered a vast portion of the known world, creating one of the largest empires in history, and was undefeated in battle?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Alexander the Great\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Alexander the Great\". The question should not contain the text \"Alexander the Great\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the ancient Macedonian king who conquered a vast portion of the known world, creating one of the largest empires in history, and was undefeated in battle?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question asks for an ancient Macedonian king who was successful in battle and conquered a vast portion of the known world. This question requires a more complex understanding of history and specifically the history of the ancient Macedonian kingdoms. Moreover, it does not directly use the name \"Alexander the Great,\" instead providing context that directly leads to him. This question is moderately challenging, as it requires an understanding of the complexities of the Macedonian empire and the historical figure in question, rather than just a straightforward identification of the individual as per the instruction. \n\n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the capital city of Portugal that is situated at the mouth of the Tagus River?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Lisbon\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Lisbon\". The question should not contain the text \"Lisbon\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the capital city of Portugal that is situated at the mouth of the Tagus River?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question requires minimal effort to deduce the answer. It is clear that \"Lisbon\" is the correct answer, which was not explicitly mentioned in the question. The question does not contain the text \"Lisbon\" which fulfills the instruction given. The only effort needed to arrive at the answer is an understanding of the context mentioned in the question, namely \"capital city of Portugal\" and its location \"situated at the mouth of the Tagus River\", which are generally known facts. Therefore, while the question is not overly complicated, it still falls within the realm of easy to moderate level questions. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Which famous art museum in the Vatican City is home to Michelangelo's frescoes on the ceiling, including "The Creation of Adam"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Sistine Chapel\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Sistine Chapel\". The question should not contain the text \"The Sistine Chapel\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich famous art museum in the Vatican City is home to Michelangelo's frescoes on the ceiling, including \"The Creation of Adam\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response contains a question that, in accordance with the instruction, does not explicitly state \"The Sistine Chapel\" but implicitly refers to it by describing its characteristics, such as its location in Vatican City and the presence of Michelangelo's frescoes. This question would be recognized and answered correctly by someone with a moderate understanding of art and art history, and therefore, fits the criteria for a score of 3. The question requires knowledge of art history and the ability to associate certain artworks with a specific place, which is a more complex concept than a simple question requiring basic knowledge. It also requires the applicant to make a leap from the description to the conclusion that the location in question is the Sistine Chapel. Thus, this question indeed reflects the qualities of a moderate level of difficulty. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What colorful phenomenon occurs when sunlight passes through water droplets in the air at a precise angle of 42 degrees?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"rainbow\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"rainbow\". The question should not contain the text \"rainbow\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat colorful phenomenon occurs when sunlight passes through water droplets in the air at a precise angle of 42 degrees?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated requires the understanding of advanced concepts such as refraction, the dispersion of light, and the occurrence of rainbows. This is a highly specialized area that requires not just knowledge of physics but also an understanding of atmospheric phenomena. It involves an intricate calculation or the application of complex reasoning, thus aligning with the \"Very Hard\" level of the rubric. The answer is \"rainbow\" as it is the specific phenomenon being questioned about. \n\nThe question formulation indicates a level of complexity that only a few individuals would be able to grasp, demonstrating a high level of challenge. Moreover, the sentence structure is quite complex and would likely require advanced problem-solving skills. This reflects a deeper level of understanding, which is required to answer such a question. \n\nIn essence, the question generated is a prime example of a \"Very Hard\" question, as it pushes the boundaries of basic scientific knowledge and entails an extensive computation of light's interaction with airborne water droplets. So the overall score is 5. [RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What type of structures do people typically live in?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"houses\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"houses\". The question should not contain the text \"houses\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of structures do people typically live in?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This response provides a question that is indeed answerable with the word \"houses.\" It covers the broad category of living structures, which is what we are looking for when asked about houses. The question is also simple and can be answered without much difficulty, which suits the scoring rubric of being an easy question. It does not involve highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning, therefore, fits the criteria of a moderate challenge. However, the question does not strictly adhere to the instruction of not containing the text \"houses\" in the question itself. So it only partially meets the criteria. Therefore, it is given a score of 3 as it does not fulfill the last part of the instruction, even though it largely fulfills the rest. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the primary factor that determines the minimum number of individuals required for a species to be viable in the long term?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"population size\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"population size\". The question should not contain the text \"population size\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the primary factor that determines the minimum number of individuals required for a species to be viable in the long term?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question, while quite broad, does not directly address \"population size\". Instead, it inquires about the factors influencing species viability over time. The response indicates an understanding of biological concepts, but it doesn't align with the instruction, as it doesn't even mention the term \"population size\", let alone asking for it. This suggests a misunderstanding of the task's requirements. The question, even if more directly related to population size, would still likely involve complex reasoning and detailed knowledge, as it is asking for a primary factor that determines the minimum number of individuals. Therefore, considering the lack of alignment with the instruction and the complexity involved, the question is considered to be \"Very Hard\". However, since the task involves creating a question that will yield \"population size\" as an answer, the response is not fitting the rubric’s criteria for a valid response. \n[RESULT] IDK</s>"
] |
Who is the main character in the Dr. Seuss book that stole Christmas from the residents of Whoville?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"the Grinch\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"the Grinch\". The question should not contain the text \"the Grinch\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the main character in the Dr. Seuss book that stole Christmas from the residents of Whoville?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question requires the knowledge of a specific book character, which, while not overly complex, is not a commonly known fact outside the bounds of someone familiar with Dr. Seuss and \"How the Grinch Stole Christmas.\" It involves an understanding of the unique aspects of this narrative, which are more specialized concepts within the realm of children's literature. The question does not delve into complicated problem-solving tactics as much as the level of difficulty seen in level 4 or 5 questions would require, but it does involve a certain level of detailed knowledge, as it focuses on a book that may not be widely read or known among a general audience. Therefore, in accordance with the scoring rubric, this question can be considered to be of a moderate level of difficulty. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What competitive sport involves training and dieting to develop one's muscular physique, often culminating in posing routines on stage?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"bodybuilding\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"bodybuilding\". The question should not contain the text \"bodybuilding\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat competitive sport involves training and dieting to develop one's muscular physique, often culminating in posing routines on stage?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question shows a good understanding of bodybuilding, as it accurately describes the sport without mentioning the term \"bodybuilding\". It asks for a sport that involves physical training and often involves stage performances. This indicates a moderately challenging question that seeks a specialized subject relevant to bodybuilding concepts. The task requires the ability to infer the concept of bodybuilding from its related activities, which is not a simple task and therefore fits into category 3 of the rubric. Nevertheless, it could benefit from further elaboration or the introduction of additional elements from the field of bodybuilding to make it a more complex question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the 43rd President of the United States and the son of George H.W. Bush?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"George Walker Bush\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"George Walker Bush\". The question should not contain the text \"George Walker Bush\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the 43rd President of the United States and the son of George H.W. Bush?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question: \"Who was the 43rd President of the United States and the son of George H.W. Bush?\" requires no specialized knowledge or complex reasoning; it is a direct and easy question. The answer provided is the correct one, adhering to the instructions given. However, the question does not fulfill the requirement of not containing the text \"George Walker Bush\" in the question. Therefore, while the question itself may be considered easy, the instruction is clearly violated. The issue of not including the text \"George Walker Bush\" is critical, as per the task requirements. Despite the directness of the question, the violation of the instructions negates the response's quality according to the criteria. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Which organ filters waste and excess fluids from the blood and regulates electrolyte levels in the body?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Kidney\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Kidney\". The question should not contain the text \"Kidney\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich organ filters waste and excess fluids from the blood and regulates electrolyte levels in the body?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question demonstrates a moderate level of complexity, as it requires a certain degree of understanding regarding the functions of human organs. The question effectively avoids the term \"Kidney\", yet still poses a challenge to identify the correct organ based on its functions. The asker has taken into account the general biological knowledge that would be expected, making it an intermediate level question. The answer, \"Kidney,\" aligns with the expectation that this question would yield a specific organ as the answer. This structure of the question is appropriate for an audience that expects the answer to be a precise identification, rather than a description of several potential answers. Hence, according to the score rubric, it is well-aligned with the criteria of a question that requires an understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the medical term for the intentional termination of a pregnancy, which is a highly controversial and debated topic in many countries?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"abortion\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"abortion\". The question should not contain the text \"abortion\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the medical term for the intentional termination of a pregnancy, which is a highly controversial and debated topic in many countries?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question in the response is fairly well-crafted and aligns with the requirement of avoiding the direct mention of \"abortion.\" However, the response itself, while indirectly referencing the concept, could potentially introduce an ambiguous interpretation, which could lead to answers other than \"abortion.\" The phrasing is nuanced and while it hints at a medical term, the lack of specific wording might not leave a clear impression that the question is exclusively about terminating a pregnancy. Therefore, while this question successfully avoids the explicit word \"abortion,\" it may not be as unambiguous as needed to ensure that the answer is guaranteed to be \"abortion.\" Consequently, the response falls slightly short of the ideal question construction. \n\nIn terms of the score rubric, the task requires the generation of a very hard question with \"abortion\" as the answer. Given that this response may leave some room for misinterpretation, it would not be categorized under the score rubric of \"Very Hard.\" Additionally, because the question could potentially be answered with a general term that doesn't necessarily relate to \"abortion,\" it doesn't fully utilize specialized knowledge or complex reasoning. \n\nTaking all these points into account, it can be concluded that the response exhibits certain strengths, especially in terms of avoiding the direct mention of \"abortion.\" However, its weakness in terms of leaving room for misinterpretation and not employing highly specialized knowledge results in a score of 3, indicating a moderate level of difficulty for generating the question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What 1939 American epic historical romance film starring Vivien Leigh and Clark Gable won eight Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Gone with the Wind\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Gone with the Wind\". The question should not contain the text \"Gone with the Wind\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat 1939 American epic historical romance film starring Vivien Leigh and Clark Gable won eight Academy Awards, including Best Picture and Best Director?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question requires a higher level of understanding, as it is about a specific film that won eight Academy Awards. It does not refer to the movie title \"Gone with the Wind,\" but instead asks for specific details about the film. This question demonstrates an understanding of more elaborate concepts, such as the historical context of the film and the people involved in its creation. The complexity of the question is reflected in the level of knowledge needed to answer it, which aligns with the score rubric's criteria for a question of moderate difficulty. However, since the question is not about the title \"Gone with the Wind,\" it does not fully satisfy the original instruction provided. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who wrote the novel "Mathilda", a Gothic fiction work published in 1819?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Shelley\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Shelley\". The question should not contain the text \"Shelley\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho wrote the novel \"Mathilda\", a Gothic fiction work published in 1819?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is moderately challenging as it requires an understanding of literary history and authorship of a specific work. It does not ask for the name \"Shelley\" directly but instead asks about the author of a specific novel, which is expected to be \"Shelley\". However, while the question is clear and the answer is correct, the question itself does not adhere to the instruction's criteria of not including the word \"Shelley\". Therefore, the question seems to be a slight deviation from the specified task. In terms of difficulty, this question demands knowledge of a specific event and figure in the field of literature, which could be seen as involving an intermediate level of expertise. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What type of soldiers were bred on the planet Kamino and served as the Grand Army of the Republic during the Clone Wars?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"clone troopers\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"clone troopers\". The question should not contain the text \"clone troopers\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of soldiers were bred on the planet Kamino and served as the Grand Army of the Republic during the Clone Wars?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]On analyzing the provided response against the instruction, it becomes evident that this question meets the criteria outlined in the score rubric. The generated question does not explicitly state \"clone troopers,\" while still pointing towards the correct answer. It uses a question format that incorporates sufficient detail, such as \"bred on the planet Kamino\" and \"served as the Grand Army of the Republic during the Clone Wars,\" which suggests that the answer should have something to do with cloning and the Republic's military.\n\nHowever, the degree of difficulty in answering this question might be open to interpretation. The question does require a certain level of knowledge regarding Star Wars, which is specialized. It would also necessitate a knowledgeable of the narrative's intricacies. Yet, this aspect of complexity and understanding of the subject matter is not directly addressed by the score rubric, which focuses more on the problem-solving skills required to answer the question.\n\nIt is this combination of knowledge about the Star Wars universe and the ability to connect the details provided in the question to the answer that poses the challenge. This challenge increases with the depth of the response and its relevance to the subject, thus making it a moderately difficult question. So the response is given a score of 3, indicating moderate difficulty in answering the question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What decisive military engagement on June 18, 1815, marked the final defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte and the end of his reign?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Battle of Waterloo\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Battle of Waterloo\". The question should not contain the text \"Battle of Waterloo\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat decisive military engagement on June 18, 1815, marked the final defeat of Napoleon Bonaparte and the end of his reign?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question requires the answer to reference the specific date of the Battle of Waterloo and its implications for Napoleon’s rule, reflecting intermediate knowledge of historical events. The phrasing avoids directly mentioning \"Battle of Waterloo,\" yet still manages to encapsulate the essential details leading to an answer of the same name. The question challenges the respondent to recognize and remember key elements of the historical occasion, indicating an appropriate level of specificity and context required for the given task. Therefore, the question aligns with the score of 3 as per the rubric’s guidelines, which require understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. However, the question's phrasing may also be considered to lean towards a score of 2, as it involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts, despite the added complexity of specific historical context. Thus, a balanced score of 3 is provided, considering both aspects of the question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What do you typically need to replace in a flashlight when it stops working?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"batteries\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"batteries\". The question should not contain the text \"batteries\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat do you typically need to replace in a flashlight when it stops working?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed by the response seems to focus on a common household item, a flashlight, and inquires about its typical replacement part, which suggests everyday knowledge rather than highly specialized or complex reasoning. Its simplicity and relatability are in line with a score of 2, as highlighted in the score rubric where it involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts. The key aspect that makes the question more challenging would be to introduce a concept that requires an understanding of more complex concepts, such as a battery's lifespan or a flashlight's circuitry. Nonetheless, since the question does not have that component and focuses on the basic question of what needs to be replaced, it fits the criterion of being more straightforward and easier to understand. Therefore, the score of 2 is appropriate for the question presented. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the title of the ancient Middle Eastern folk tale collection that features the stories of Aladdin, Ali Baba, and Sindbad the Sailor?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"One Thousand and One Nights\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"One Thousand and One Nights\". The question should not contain the text \"One Thousand and One Nights\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the ancient Middle Eastern folk tale collection that features the stories of Aladdin, Ali Baba, and Sindbad the Sailor?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question effectively challenges the answerer with a moderately complex concept, as it requires a good understanding of various characters and stories from the collection \"One Thousand and One Nights\". There is a need for a detailed knowledge base about the narrative to deduce the correct answer. While the question does not require the actual text to be mentioned, it relies heavily on the knowledge of the individual stories within the collection, which could make it a bit more difficult than a basic question. Hence, it aligns with a score of 3 according to the rubric. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What type of musical instrument is typically found in a church and uses a keyboard to control a series of pipes to produce sound?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"pipe organ\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"pipe organ\". The question should not contain the text \"pipe organ\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of musical instrument is typically found in a church and uses a keyboard to control a series of pipes to produce sound?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is crafted with a clever wording that elicits the correct answer \"pipe organ\" without directly mentioning the phrase \"pipe organ\". It involves a straightforward application of common knowledge about musical instruments found in churches and the control mechanism of these instruments. The response assumes the reader's basic understanding of musical instruments and their functionalities, and it applies this to a specific scenario - a church context. The question effectively covers the specified aspects of the question: it's not too easy, it does not involve advanced understanding, and it is formatted in the desired manner. It demonstrates a moderate level of challenge and adheres to the given instructions. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What type of vessel was famously piloted by Mark Twain on the Mississippi River?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"steamboat\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"steamboat\". The question should not contain the text \"steamboat\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of vessel was famously piloted by Mark Twain on the Mississippi River?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is quite challenging and requires a high level of understanding and knowledge. The query is phrased in a way that necessitates an advanced understanding of historical events, a concept that is not common knowledge or a straightforward application of common knowledge. The question demands the respondent to recall and apply specific historical context regarding Mark Twain and the Mississippi River, and thus involves complex reasoning. The question is also well-crafted so as to exclude the direct mention of the keyword \"steamboat,\" which is a fundamental feature of the task. It is not a simple question that can be answered with basic knowledge. So the overall difficulty level of the question aligns with a score of 5 on the rubric. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What element, with the atomic number 17, is commonly used as a disinfectant in swimming pools?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Chlorine\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Chlorine\". The question should not contain the text \"Chlorine\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat element, with the atomic number 17, is commonly used as a disinfectant in swimming pools?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This response generates a question that is very easy to answer. The question relies on basic knowledge of elements and their atomic numbers, as well as common knowledge about the use of chlorine in swimming pools. The response is structured in a straightforward manner and does not involve complex reasoning or extensive calculations. Therefore, based on the given score rubric, the question posed in the response falls under the category of being \"Very Easy\" as it demands only basic knowledge and does not present a challenge. So the overall score is 1. [RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What protects the planet from harmful solar winds and charged particles from the sun?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Earth’s magnetic field\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Earth’s magnetic field\". The question should not contain the text \"Earth’s magnetic field\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat protects the planet from harmful solar winds and charged particles from the sun?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question cleverly encapsulates the role of Earth's magnetic field in protecting the planet from solar radiation, without explicitly using the phrase \"Earth’s magnetic field.\" The question taps into well-understood scientific concepts and demonstrates a moderate level of challenge that would require some understanding of earth's protective mechanisms. However, it is not overly complicated or involve complex reasoning, and therefore aligns with the moderately challenging criteria set in the rubric. Thus, it would receive a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which city is home to the headquarters of the United Nations?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"New York City\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"New York City\". The question should not contain the text \"New York City\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich city is home to the headquarters of the United Nations?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated seems to require the application of some general knowledge about international bodies, specifically where the United Nations headquarters are located. This is not particularly challenging, and the information required can be easily found using basic search engines. The response demonstrates a straightforward approach to the question, which aligns with the score rubric's description for a question scoring a 2. The answer \"New York City\" correlates with the knowledge commonly associated with the United Nations' headquarter location, showcasing a simple yet accurate response. Therefore, the overall difficulty of the question and the manner in which the answer was derived does not significantly contribute to the complexity or uniqueness of the response. The challenge is relatively basic and does not engage the respondent in advanced reasoning or analysis. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who is the Venezuelan military leader who led the fight for independence from Spain in several South American countries, including Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Peru?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Simón de Bolívar\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Simón de Bolívar\". The question should not contain the text \"Simón de Bolívar\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Venezuelan military leader who led the fight for independence from Spain in several South American countries, including Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Peru?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response given does not meet the instruction's requirements. The instruction asked for a one-sentence question that could be answered with \"Simón de Bolívar,\" and the response did indeed create a question about Bolívar. However, the response does not exclude the name \"Simón de Bolívar\" from the question and directly asks for the name, which is against the instructions. As such, while the response does demonstrate an understanding of the subject matter and constructs an appropriate question, it fails to adhere to the explicit guidelines provided. Therefore, the response does not satisfy the requirements set by the score rubric and does not provide a challenging question. The feedback thus aligns with the criteria for a score of 1 in the score rubric, as the question does not impose any substantial challenge or demand higher level thinking or problem-solving. The rubric does not favor the response and therefore justifies a score of 1. So the overall score is 1. [RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the primary activity that takes place in a casino, aside from dining and entertainment?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"gambling\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"gambling\". The question should not contain the text \"gambling\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the primary activity that takes place in a casino, aside from dining and entertainment?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question successfully adheres to the instruction by posing a question that could be logically answered by someone who understands the operations of a casino. This implies that the question does not contain the text \"gambling\", which fulfills the given requirement. However, the question seems a bit difficult to answer for a general audience, as it requires a certain level of knowledge about the activities in a casino. The specificity of the question, which asks for the \"primary activity\" excluding \"dining and entertainment,\" hints at a level of complexity higher than the simplest scenario. It doesn't require extensive calculations or highly specialized knowledge, but the required knowledge is a bit more advanced than basic, as required to answer at all. Therefore, considering the level of complexity implied by the question, it aligns more with a moderate level of difficulty as per the score rubric. As such, while the question is certainly not very easy or very hard, it leans more towards the moderate side. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the only gemstone that is composed of pure carbon and is known for its exceptional hardness and brilliance?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"diamonds\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"diamonds\". The question should not contain the text \"diamonds\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the only gemstone that is composed of pure carbon and is known for its exceptional hardness and brilliance?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question demonstrates a moderate level of difficulty, leaning slightly towards the complex side. It requires the respondent to have a certain level of knowledge about gemstones in general, and subsequently, to correctly identify the specific qualities defining a diamond. While the concept of a gemstone being composed of pure carbon and known for its hardness and brilliance is a common piece of knowledge, the integration of these elements in a coherent one-sentence question adds an intermediate level of complexity to the task. It's not overly challenging, but it doesn't quite reach the level of a basic question either. Therefore, based on the scoring rubric, this response is deserving of a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the king of Ithaca and the hero of Homer's epic poem, the Odyssey?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Odysseus\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Odysseus\". The question should not contain the text \"Odysseus\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the king of Ithaca and the hero of Homer's epic poem, the Odyssey?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question, although it alludes to the character of Odysseus, does not require the identification of the character himself. It asks for a clarification on the king of Ithaca and mentions Homer's epic poem, the Odyssey, but fails to directly reference the protagonist's name. As per the given instruction and score rubric, the question should be one that has a single answer and the answer should be \"Odysseus.\" This response does not meet that requirement. Therefore, based on the evaluation criteria, this question would score a 2, as it involves a straightforward application of common knowledge related to the character of Odysseus, but fails to directly inquire about the character's name. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What farm animals are known for rolling around in mud to cool themselves down and protect their skin from the sun?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"pigs\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"pigs\". The question should not contain the text \"pigs\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat farm animals are known for rolling around in mud to cool themselves down and protect their skin from the sun?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question does not directly ask about \"pigs,\" but it does involve an understanding of animals that engage in mud bathing, describing the practice of rolling around in mud as a means of cooling themselves and protecting their skin. Given this, it can be deduced that the question is asking about animals that display these behaviors. While this question may require some knowledge about farm animals and their habits, it does not demand highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning to its full extent. The question is more straightforward and involves a slight challenge to figure out that the only animals known for doing these things are pigs. So, the overall difficulty level of the question aligns with a score of 2 according to the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who is the only person to have won Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields, physics and chemistry?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Curie\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Curie\". The question should not contain the text \"Curie\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the only person to have won Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields, physics and chemistry?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented in the response is moderately challenging as it requires understanding of more complex concepts. It necessitates the identification of an individual who has achieved the rare distinction of being awarded Nobel Prizes in two different scientific fields. This question does not directly use the word \"Curie,\" but instead, it alludes to it by not explicitly naming the person and focusing on the nature of their accomplishments. The complexity of the answer lies in the understanding of the scientific fields involved and the uniqueness of achieving such a feat. Therefore, although it is not extremely hard, the question goes beyond basic knowledge and common concepts, making it a bit more challenging than a simple calculation or knowledge question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What term is used to describe the practice of people traveling together in a vehicle, often for commuting or social purposes, with the cost of the trip being shared among the passengers?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"ridesharing\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"ridesharing\". The question should not contain the text \"ridesharing\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat term is used to describe the practice of people traveling together in a vehicle, often for commuting or social purposes, with the cost of the trip being shared among the passengers?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This response does a commendable job of framing a question that would likely yield the correct answer without including the term \"ridesharing\" explicitly. The question is well structured and touches on important aspects of ridesharing, like cost sharing and the communal nature of the practice. These elements are clearly integral to the concept of ridesharing, and their inclusion aligns well with the task. The response is not overly complex, yet it requires more than just basic knowledge, making it a moderate challenge. The answer it seeks is \"ridesharing\", a concept that is familiar to many, indicating a balanced difficulty level. The phrasing of the question also prevents direct recognition of the answer \"ridesharing\", thus maintaining the challenge aspect. For these reasons, the response fits well within the range of moderate difficulty. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the American poet and novelist who wrote "The Bell Jar" and died by suicide in 1963 at the age of 30?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Sylvia Plath\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Sylvia Plath\". The question should not contain the text \"Sylvia Plath\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the American poet and novelist who wrote \"The Bell Jar\" and died by suicide in 1963 at the age of 30?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The provided response is moderately challenging, as it requires a decent understanding of American literature of the 20th century and an awareness of influential figures within that time frame. It calls for an identification of \"The Bell Jar\" as a work of literature and a knowledge of the person responsible for its creation. However, it does not present an extremely intricate question. The respondent would have to possess a foundational level of understanding about this specific aspect of literature history, yet it is not so complex that it requires extensive research or highly specialized knowledge. The question also refrains from directly naming \"Sylvia Plath\", thus leaving room for the question to potentially be answered with other names, though in reality, \"Sylvia Plath\" is the only correct answer. Therefore, based on the score rubric which seeks to evaluate the difficulty of the question, the response is indeed between scores 3 and 5, with a slight lean towards a more moderate challenge. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which Spanish surrealist artist painted "The Persistence of Memory" and was known for his iconic mustache?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Salvador Dalí\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Salvador Dalí\". The question should not contain the text \"Salvador Dalí\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich Spanish surrealist artist painted \"The Persistence of Memory\" and was known for his iconic mustache?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented requires some level of knowledge to answer correctly. It relies on a person's general awareness of famous artists and art history, incorporating the element of identification based on a description. The response effectively formulates a question that leads to the identification of \"Salvador Dalí\" as the correct answer, using common knowledge about an artist that is recognizable for its unique features. Thus, the question is challenging enough to prompt an answer, but not to the extent of requiring highly specialized knowledge or extensive calculations. The answer could be obtained without complex reasoning or detailed knowledge, but it does require understanding of the surrealism movement and some art history. This question is considered to be at the middle level of the score rubric, and it is a well-crafted question that aligns with the criteria of challenging the respondent without crossing the borders of complexity or reasoning. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the Roman Emperor who, in 313 CE, issued the Edict of Milan, which granted Christians freedom of worship throughout the empire?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Constantine the Great\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Constantine the Great\". The question should not contain the text \"Constantine the Great\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the Roman Emperor who, in 313 CE, issued the Edict of Milan, which granted Christians freedom of worship throughout the empire?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed by the response requires a deep understanding of historical events and figures. It specifically asks for the Roman Emperor who granted religious freedom to Christians, which shows it contains advanced elements. However, the question also incorporates a direct answer, which indicates a degree of complexity beyond basic knowledge. The question does not simply state who Constantine the Great is; it requires knowledge of historical events and the individual's significance in them. The answer is not directly provided, which is a critical element of the task. Therefore, the question meets the criteria for a hard score in the rubric, as it demands advanced understanding and multi-step problem-solving. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which country has the highest population in West Africa and is home to the Osun Osogbo Sacred Grove, a UNESCO World Heritage Site?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Nigeria\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Nigeria\". The question should not contain the text \"Nigeria\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country has the highest population in West Africa and is home to the Osun Osogbo Sacred Grove, a UNESCO World Heritage Site?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated about Nigeria has an intermediate level because it involves a minor calculation involving population statistics and geographical knowledge, specifically identifying the number one country in West Africa based on population. The question also includes a factual element about the Osun Osogbo Sacred Grove. This requires some level of specialized knowledge about the region and its distinct attractions. However, it doesn't include highly specialized knowledge or complex calculations. It seems to bridge the divide between the very easy and the very hard questions, leaning more towards an intermediate one due to the integration of both population statistics and geographic attributes. Therefore, based on the rubric, this is a more complex query than a very easy question but not as demanding as a very hard question. So the score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the title of the 2003 novel by Louis Sachar that tells the story of Stanley Yelnats IV's journey to Camp Green Lake?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Holes\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Holes\". The question should not contain the text \"Holes\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the 2003 novel by Louis Sachar that tells the story of Stanley Yelnats IV's journey to Camp Green Lake?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question, \"What is the title of the 2003 novel by Louis Sachar that tells the story of Stanley Yelnats IV's journey to Camp Green Lake?\", requires an advanced understanding of literature and specific knowledge of the book in question, which is \"Holes\". There is no ambiguity in the answer and no possibility for a different answer, which shows a high level of challenge in the question. It demands detailed knowledge and multi-step problem-solving to identify the exact book and author, which is consistent with a score of 5 on the rubric. Thus, based on the complexity of the question and the necessity for specialized knowledge, it fulfills the criteria for a score of 5. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What organelle is responsible for several functions including protein synthesis, lipid synthesis, detoxification, and storage, and is composed of both rough and smooth regions?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Endoplasmic Reticulum\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Endoplasmic Reticulum\". The question should not contain the text \"Endoplasmic Reticulum\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat organelle is responsible for several functions including protein synthesis, lipid synthesis, detoxification, and storage, and is composed of both rough and smooth regions?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question demands an advanced understanding of cellular biology and more specifically, the endoplasmic reticulum, which it correctly identifies as the organelle fulfilling the criteria outlined in the question. It covers several functions, the presence of rough and smooth regions, yet refrains from using the specific term, \"Endoplasmic Reticulum\". The question successfully hides an intricate system within complex reasoning, while also keeping calculations at bay. This is in line with a score of 5 in the rubric as the question is not just challenging, but requires a high level of specialized knowledge. Therefore, according to the rubric, the response exhibits an excellent level of complexity and knowledge-testing. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What was the NASA mission that successfully landed astronauts on the Moon between 1969 and 1972?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Apollo Program\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Apollo Program\". The question should not contain the text \"Apollo Program\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat was the NASA mission that successfully landed astronauts on the Moon between 1969 and 1972?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question accurately captures the historical context of the \"Apollo Program\" without explicitly using the phrase \"Apollo Program.\" It engages the audience with a question about a specific past event and provides a clear avenue for the answer that is expected. It does not presume the reader's prior knowledge and invites the exploration of historical facts. The question appears to be designed to elicit the desired answer without the use of the text \"Apollo Program.\" Therefore, the challenge of producing a question that leads to a particular answer, in this case, the \"Apollo Program,\" seems appropriate and in line with the given instruction. \n\nIn examining the criteria of the score rubric, this question can be classified as a score of 2 due to its straightforward nature. It does not require an in-depth analysis or an intricate understanding of specialized knowledge. It simply asks for the name of a well-known space mission, which would be easily recallable or look up for a general audience. Hence, the question posed is sufficiently challenging and provides a path to a precise answer. Therefore, the question posed successfully challenges the audience. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the change in direction of a light beam when it bounces back after hitting a surface?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"reflection\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"reflection\". The question should not contain the text \"reflection\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the change in direction of a light beam when it bounces back after hitting a surface?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response asks a question related to the scattering of light. While the question is correctly framed, it does not align with the original instruction, which specifically requests a question where the only possible answer is \"reflection.\" The response, therefore, does not meet the criteria laid out in the score rubric as it does not contain the text \"reflection\" and instead poses a question unrelated to the required concept. The given question does not adhere to the constraints of being one-sentence long, nor does it relate to \"reflection.\" Thus, according to the score rubric, it falls short on all aspects and would therefore be scored as a 1. The question generated is too complex and does not have a definitive answer related to the requested concept. Hence, this response does not meet the criteria outlined in the rubric. [RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.