question
stringlengths 12
377
| feedback
listlengths 1
1
|
|---|---|
How many nose do humans typically have?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"one\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"one\". The question should not contain the text \"one\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nHow many nose do humans typically have?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the scoring rubric, the question posed is quite easy and straightforward. It requires only a simple understanding of the number of features associated with humans, in this case, the nose. While the question may involve a bit of reasoning, it does not involve any advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving. Hence, it does not meet the criteria for a higher score, such as a score of 5. The answer to the question indeed is \"one\". \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Who was the posthumous Medal of Honor recipient and son of the 26th President of the United States?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Theodore Roosevelt Jr.\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Theodore Roosevelt Jr.\". The question should not contain the text \"Theodore Roosevelt Jr.\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the posthumous Medal of Honor recipient and son of the 26th President of the United States?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is easy, requiring only basic knowledge. It doesn't contain the explicit name \"Theodore Roosevelt Jr.,\" yet it asks a question that can be easily answered with this name. The question applies straightforward common knowledge about historical figures and their achievements. It does not involve complex reasoning or extensive calculations, thus adhering to the score rubric description for a score of 2. Therefore, it is appropriate to rate this question with a score of 2. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the process of cleaning clothing or other fabrics with water and soap?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"washing\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"washing\". The question should not contain the text \"washing\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the process of cleaning clothing or other fabrics with water and soap?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question, \"What is the process of cleaning clothing or other fabrics with water and soap?\" is designed to generate the answer \"washing\" when posed to an individual. However, it contains the explicit text \"washing\" in its wording, which clearly contradicts the instruction. The phrasing \"cleaning clothing or other fabrics with water and soap\" could be interpreted as a broader term for multiple cleaning processes, which does not fit the requirement for a question that has the only possible answer to be \"washing\". This oversight makes the question less effective in achieving the desired outcome. Hence, the question is too vague and does not adequately challenge the individual to think about the concept of \"washing\" separately from the broader context of cleaning with water and soap. Therefore, the question lacks the necessary clarity and specificity that would guide the individual to provide the correct answer, which is why it does not meet the criteria for a challenging question. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Which Charles Dickens novel features a character who asks for more gruel in a famous scene?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Oliver Twist\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Oliver Twist\". The question should not contain the text \"Oliver Twist\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich Charles Dickens novel features a character who asks for more gruel in a famous scene?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response contains a question that's easy to understand and asks for a detail that is well-known and not complex. The question employs common knowledge associated with Charles Dickens and \"Oliver Twist,\" which is a key scene from the novel. As such, the question meets the requirements of being challenging to a reasonable extent, but not to the point that it requires extensive calculation or complex reasoning. While the question may not be as easy as \"What is x multiplied by y?\", it is still an intermediate level question as it requires some knowledge about characters and events from \"Oliver Twist\". Therefore, based on the given score rubric, the response aligns with the score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What classic science fiction anthology series created and narrated by Rod Serling explored the human condition through supernatural and paranormal themes?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Twilight Zone\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Twilight Zone\". The question should not contain the text \"The Twilight Zone\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat classic science fiction anthology series created and narrated by Rod Serling explored the human condition through supernatural and paranormal themes?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question requires a specific type of knowledge: awareness of the \"The Twilight Zone\" series, its creator, and its genre. It doesn't directly use the name \"The Twilight Zone\" but alludes to it with phrases like \"classic science fiction anthology series\" and \"supernatural and paranormal themes.\" The question is formulated in such a way that only the most informed and knowledgeable individuals would be able to answer with \"The Twilight Zone.\" The challenge is heightened by the absence of any direct reference to the series, making the question's answer less obvious and more challenging to answer. Consequently, this question clearly demonstrates a high level of difficulty according to the score rubric. The complexity in answering it reflects a significant depth of understanding and knowledge. Hence, in terms of the question's difficulty, it aligns well with the score of 5. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Which country has the longest land border with North Korea?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"China\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"China\". The question should not contain the text \"China\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country has the longest land border with North Korea?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is relatively straightforward and could be answered by someone with a basic understanding of international relations and geography. It requires the ability to identify which countries share a land border, and then to specify the country in question accurately. This task is commonplace and does not require any specialized knowledge. Therefore, according to the scoring rubric, this question is relatively easy and would fall into the third or fourth category, depending on the precise criteria. The final answer is \"China\", which meets the instructions but does not explicitly contain the word \"China\" in the question itself, making the response valid. \n\nHowever, it should be noted that the question itself is somewhat misleading. Given the specificity of the question in the context of international relations and geography, it would have been better if the question simply asked for the longest land border between China and North Korea. The current phrasing might lead some respondents to focus on the land border between the asked country (in this case, North Korea) and another country instead of responding to the implied reference to China. This adds an additional layer of complexity to the answer, which is not necessary and might cause misunderstanding. So the overall score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What are the primary components of a rocket that produce thrust by expelling hot gases?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"engines\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"engines\". The question should not contain the text \"engines\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat are the primary components of a rocket that produce thrust by expelling hot gases?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response is rather complex and advanced, with the question requiring an understanding of rocketry and its components. While the question is clearly connected to the concept of rocket engines, it does not explicitly ask for the answer \"engines,\" thus not fulfilling the criterion set forth in the instruction. The question, in its essence, is seeking the primary components of rocket engines, rather than merely the term \"engines.\" Therefore, according to the rubric, the question is complex and demands advanced understanding, but it does not meet the requirement for the answer to be \"engines,\" due to the indirect approach in asking about the components producing thrust. This approach also introduces terms like \"rocket\", \"primary components\", and \"hot gases\", which are beyond the scope of a simple question centered on \"engines\". Consequently, while the question demonstrates advanced reasoning, it falls short in aligning with the instruction's condition for the answer to explicitly include the term \"engines.\" Hence, the question does not satisfy the task requirements and the score rubric indicates that a question with such complexity would score a 4. In conclusion, while the question is challenging and requires advanced knowledge, it doesn't directly address the topic of the answer being \"engines,\" making it a complex question rather than the required straightforward one. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who is the ancient Greek storyteller credited with creating the fables that feature animals and teach moral lessons?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Aesop\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Aesop\". The question should not contain the text \"Aesop\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the ancient Greek storyteller credited with creating the fables that feature animals and teach moral lessons?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response does indeed adhere to the instruction by creating a one-sentence question that can be answered solely by an identification of the figure described in the question. However, the question, while still appropriate to the instruction, does involve a more specialized knowledge that goes beyond a simple question of familiarity with a name. It demands recognition of a specific ancient Greek storyteller and also includes specific characteristics of the storyteller's work, such as the use of animals and imparting moral lessons. This requires understanding of cultural and literary history. As a result, this question aligns with a score of 4, as it does not require highly specialized knowledge or extensive calculations but does involve advanced understanding and detailed knowledge. So, the overall score is 4. [RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which country has a coastline on the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean, and is home to the autonomous communities of Catalonia and the Basque Country?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Spain\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Spain\". The question should not contain the text \"Spain\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country has a coastline on the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean, and is home to the autonomous communities of Catalonia and the Basque Country?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is well-structured and requires the knowledge of countries on two different oceans, as well as information about their constituent regions. However, the complexity of the question is moderate. Although it involves advanced understanding and requires intermediate calculations, it does not push the limits of highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning. It also relies on common knowledge, thus making it a moderately challenging question. Furthermore, the question's format, which allows for an answer based purely on the information provided, does not add to the overall difficulty. Overall, it fits better in the score range of 3, where the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations, but does not demand advanced understanding or multi-step problem-solving. Therefore, considering the moderate complexity, and following the score rubric, the assessment would be a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the Baroque composer credited with creating the "Air on the G String" and the "Goldberg Variations"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Johann Sebastian Bach\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Johann Sebastian Bach\". The question should not contain the text \"Johann Sebastian Bach\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Baroque composer credited with creating the \"Air on the G String\" and the \"Goldberg Variations\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated by the response requires a certain degree of specialized knowledge. By asking for a Baroque composer credited with distinct pieces, the question assumes that the answerer has some familiarity with this particular era and its composers. It also makes use of specific titles (\"Air on the G String\" and \"Goldberg Variations\"), suggesting a deeper understanding of the subject matter. The difficulty of the question is not as steep as the highest level score, which demands complex reasoning and extensive calculations; however, it is still a moderate challenge, as it goes beyond common knowledge to involve intermediate problem-solving skills. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the name of the Ukrainian nuclear power plant that suffered a catastrophic explosion on April 26, 1986, releasing large quantities of radioactive materials into the environment?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant\". The question should not contain the text \"Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the name of the Ukrainian nuclear power plant that suffered a catastrophic explosion on April 26, 1986, releasing large quantities of radioactive materials into the environment?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question constructed in the response is of intermediate complexity. It requires a moderate understanding of historical events and a basic understanding of nuclear power plants. It also hints at a knowledge of the types of accidents that can occur at such facilities. This question may be slightly more challenging than a question that merely asks for the name of a place without any additional context or details. However, it is not excessively difficult, as it does not involve highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning that would be indicative of a score 5 question. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the poor but kind-hearted boy who finds a Golden Ticket in Roald Dahl's classic children's novel?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Charlie Bucket\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Charlie Bucket\". The question should not contain the text \"Charlie Bucket\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the poor but kind-hearted boy who finds a Golden Ticket in Roald Dahl's classic children's novel?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided shows a moderate level of complexity. The respondent has identified a well-known character from a classic children's story and framed the question in a way that requires understanding of the narrative context. The question does not simply ask for the character's name; instead, it provides additional detail about the character's persona and the significant event that sets the character apart. While the question is not extremely complex, it does require a certain level of understanding of the novel and its characters to deduce the answer. Thus, the question is challenging enough to fit into the middle range of the score rubric, which describes a question requiring understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the highest rank of classification in biology that ranks below domain and above phylum?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"kingdom\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"kingdom\". The question should not contain the text \"kingdom\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the highest rank of classification in biology that ranks below domain and above phylum?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question does not contain the term \"kingdom,\" as instructed. However, the question does involve advanced understanding of biological classification. It specifically asks for the class between domain and phylum, which would not be immediately known to someone without a background in biology. This shows an assessment of higher level knowledge, requiring a familiarity with the concept of classification and an understanding of intermediate taxonomic categories. Hence, it aligns with a score of 4. The question is not excessively difficult, but it does require a thorough knowledge of biology, which would be evident in a comprehensive answer. In this sense, it is clear that the question is posed at a level of complexity that would be expected to be answered with \"kingdom\" correctly. However, it is important to note that the question is constructed in such a way that it would be difficult for a layman to answer accurately. Therefore, the question is well-suited to the score of 4 based on the evaluation criteria.\n\n\n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which country, known for its rugged terrain and strategic location, has been the site of numerous military conflicts, including the Soviet-Afghan War and the War in Afghanistan?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Afghanistan\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Afghanistan\". The question should not contain the text \"Afghanistan\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country, known for its rugged terrain and strategic location, has been the site of numerous military conflicts, including the Soviet-Afghan War and the War in Afghanistan?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is well-crafted and posed in a way that requires a certain level of knowledge about history and geopolitics. It does not explicitly mention Afghanistan, instead referring to it through its geographical and historical context. This design is both challenging and engaging, as it requires the respondent to draw connections between the description and the answer they are seeking. The level of difficulty in such a question is higher than questions that can be answered by simple calculation or basic knowledge, which would score lower on the rubric. It is on par with questions that require intermediate knowledge or more complex concepts. Thus, the question fits into the category of moderate difficulty. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What ancient Egyptian structures, often associated with pharaohs and mummification, were built as tombs and are characterized by their triangular shape and massive size?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"pyramids\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"pyramids\". The question should not contain the text \"pyramids\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat ancient Egyptian structures, often associated with pharaohs and mummification, were built as tombs and are characterized by their triangular shape and massive size?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]While the response does fulfill the instruction of formulating a question that has \"pyramids\" as the answer without using the text \"pyramids\", it doesn't quite align with the score rubric's emphasis on the question's challenge level. The question, although not explicitly stating \"pyramids,\" seems to be relatively straightforward, as it alludes to the ancient Egyptian structures that most people would recognize as pyramids. This suggests that the question may require only a basic level of understanding or knowledge. Therefore, based on the score rubric which demands a level of challenge ranging from easy to very hard, this response doesn't display that level of challenge. It is more of a question about a general topic of ancient Egyptian structures rather than focusing on a more specialized or specific aspect of these structures. So the overall score is 1. [RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What type of angle has a measure of 90 degrees?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"right angle\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"right angle\". The question should not contain the text \"right angle\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of angle has a measure of 90 degrees?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is straightforward and does not contain the text \"right angle\", aligning with the given instruction. It effectively poses a question that would elicit the correct answer – \"right angle\". The complexity of this question aligns with the score rubric; it is simple and does not require advanced knowledge or complex reasoning. It involves a basic understanding of angles and their measurements, which is common knowledge and meets the criteria of challenging the respondent with simple reasoning. The question directly relates to the answer \"right angle\", making it an appropriate puzzle to provide for the respondent. Therefore, according to the score rubric, the question's challenge level is estimated to be around 1, as it requires a simple calculation and basic knowledge, thus it is not a difficult question. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
During which geological time period, which spanned from approximately 200 to 145 million years ago, did many iconic dinosaurs like Brachiosaurus and Allosaurus roam the Earth?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Jurassic period\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Jurassic period\". The question should not contain the text \"Jurassic period\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nDuring which geological time period, which spanned from approximately 200 to 145 million years ago, did many iconic dinosaurs like Brachiosaurus and Allosaurus roam the Earth?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question effectively involves complex reasoning as it requires the respondent to recall and accurately apply knowledge of geological time periods, dinosaur species, and their respective eras. The respondent must identify the Jurassic period correctly based on the time frame given, rather than just knowing the term \"Jurassic period\". This question also avoids using the text \"Jurassic period\" within the question itself, adhering to the task's instruction. Hence, the question demonstrates a high level of challenge that aligns with a score of 5. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Who is the only person to have signed all three of the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, and the Treaty of Paris?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Benjamin Franklin\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Benjamin Franklin\". The question should not contain the text \"Benjamin Franklin\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the only person to have signed all three of the Declaration of Independence, the United States Constitution, and the Treaty of Paris?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in the response is quite challenging and would likely require a very high level of knowledge and historical analysis. It doesn't provide any initial clue or context, thus it is not a simple question that can be easily answered with common knowledge. The question requires understanding of the key historical events and figures associated with these documents. The person who signed all three documents is Benjamin Franklin, which is indeed a very challenging question. It does not meet the criteria for a score of 1 or 2 as it does not involve a simple calculation or straightforward application of common knowledge. The question is too complex to score a 3. Therefore, it meets the criteria for a score of 4 or 5. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What was the influential anti-slavery novel written by Harriet Beecher Stowe and published in 1852?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Uncle Tom’s Cabin\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Uncle Tom’s Cabin\". The question should not contain the text \"Uncle Tom’s Cabin\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat was the influential anti-slavery novel written by Harriet Beecher Stowe and published in 1852?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is challenging in the way that it requires a broader knowledge base. The question focuses on the writing and publishing history of \"Uncle Tom’s Cabin\", demonstrating a need for understanding about 19th century literature and anti-slavery movements. Furthermore, the question involves a slight degree of problem-solving, as it asks for specific details about the novel. The ability to comprehend the significance of Harriet Beecher Stowe’s work and its historical context is crucial for answering the question. The question is not only about the author and the publication date but also about the influence the novel had on society. This complexity aligns with the criteria for a score 5 according to the rubric. \n\nThis level of complexity is appropriate given the requirement to generate a question with only one possible answer, the necessity to consider multiple factors and to apply knowledge beyond a basic level. Therefore, based on the criteria set by the score rubric, the question generated by the response is indeed challenging and aligns well with the highest level of difficulty. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What mathematical operation is represented by the plus sign (+)?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"addition\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"addition\". The question should not contain the text \"addition\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat mathematical operation is represented by the plus sign (+)?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question does pose an understanding of mathematical operations and hence requires intermediate knowledge. The answer \"addition\" directly relates to the question asked, which involves the use of specific mathematical symbols to represent mathematical operations. In this case, 'addition' corresponds to the 'plus sign' in the question, demonstrating a moderate level of complexity that aligns with the rubric's criteria for a score of 3. The explanation does not contain the text \"addition,\" and the format of the question is in line with the requirements. However, it could have been more challenging with a more intricate question or a detailed explanation, as indicated by the rubric for a higher scoring range. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What 1850 novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne tells the story of Hester Prynne and her daughter Pearl in a Puritan community in 17th-century Massachusetts?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Scarlet Letter\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Scarlet Letter\". The question should not contain the text \"The Scarlet Letter\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat 1850 novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne tells the story of Hester Prynne and her daughter Pearl in a Puritan community in 17th-century Massachusetts?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provided is an excellent example of a question that is just challenging enough. It requires a fair level of knowledge about literature, specifically the works of Nathaniel Hawthorne. However, it does not assume knowledge of the actual title of Hawthorne's book, which is what the task demands. This requirement for knowledge about the title without providing the title itself is the crux of the challenge. The question is tailored to provoke reflection and thought without making it too difficult. It aligns well with a score of 3 according to the rubric, which indicates a moderate level of difficulty requiring understanding of more complex concepts. The question is neither too easy nor too hard, and it engages the reader's curiosity effectively. So the overall score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which historical empire, founded by Osman Bey in the late 13th century, was centered in modern-day Turkey and at its peak controlled much of Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Ottoman Empire\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Ottoman Empire\". The question should not contain the text \"Ottoman Empire\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich historical empire, founded by Osman Bey in the late 13th century, was centered in modern-day Turkey and at its peak controlled much of Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This response successfully generated a question that requires the correct answer to be \"Ottoman Empire\". The question is posed as a historical query and provides an elaborate detail of the empire's origins, center, and its dominion over multiple regions. It requires advanced understanding of European and Middle Eastern history and geography, which aligns well with the score rubric's criteria for a level 4 difficulty. The structure of the question is also well-crafted and invites an informed response. However, given the complexity of the question, it would benefit from even more detailed knowledge or multi-step problem-solving. Therefore, while the question's formulation and the information given reflect a good understanding of the topic, the slight lack in elaboration and detail compared to a very hard question is what makes this a level 4, rather than a 5. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who is the Russian physiologist credited with discovering the concept of classical conditioning through his experiments with dogs and bells?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Ivan Pavlov\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Ivan Pavlov\". The question should not contain the text \"Ivan Pavlov\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Russian physiologist credited with discovering the concept of classical conditioning through his experiments with dogs and bells?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in the response is relatively easy as it does not contain the text \"Ivan Pavlov\" and could be answered by a person with a reasonable level of general knowledge. However, it does assume some level of familiarity with classical conditioning and its related concepts. This question could be seen as a moderate challenge, as it requires an understanding of a specific subject, but not to an advanced level. Therefore, based on the given rubric, this question would receive a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What type of animal is typically associated with hibernation in the forest?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"bears\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"bears\". The question should not contain the text \"bears\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of animal is typically associated with hibernation in the forest?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is moderately challenging, as it implies understanding of an animal behavior, specifically hibernation in the context of a forest, without directly mentioning \"bears.\" The question requires knowledge of wildlife and a familiarity with the concept of hibernation. It demands an intermediate level of understanding to identify that bears are associated with hibernation in forests. Therefore, the question can be considered an intermediate-level reasoning problem that requires some understanding of animal behavior and habitat preferences. This level of challenge is between the simpler, straightforward reasoning problem and more complex, specialized knowledge questions. The question provides a reasonable expectation for an answer to follow, meeting the constraints of the instruction. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the Indian spiritual teacher and founder of Buddhism who is said to have achieved enlightenment under the Bodhi Tree in Bodh Gaya?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Gautama Buddha\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Gautama Buddha\". The question should not contain the text \"Gautama Buddha\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Indian spiritual teacher and founder of Buddhism who is said to have achieved enlightenment under the Bodhi Tree in Bodh Gaya?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given instruction required the formulation of a one-sentence question with the answer \"Gautama Buddha\" without explicitly including the phrase \"Gautama Buddha\" in the question. The response \"Who is the Indian spiritual teacher and founder of Buddhism who is said to have achieved enlightenment under the Bodhi Tree in Bodh Gaya?\" is an effective question in that it adheres to the instruction by not mentioning \"Gautama Buddha.\" It's also an appropriately challenging question that demands advanced knowledge and understanding of historical and cultural context. This challenge lies in the precise specification of the individual in question, which includes the place of enlightenment and the spiritual significance of these places. Hence, it fits the criteria for a score of 4 on the rubric, as it is hard and demands detailed knowledge. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which Native American woman played a key role in the early history of the English colonies in America and was the daughter of Chief Powhatan?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Pocahontas\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Pocahontas\". The question should not contain the text \"Pocahontas\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich Native American woman played a key role in the early history of the English colonies in America and was the daughter of Chief Powhatan?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is somewhat complex in its phrasing, requiring an understanding of the Native American context, the history of the English colonies, and the roles of women in those societies. The question is formulated in a way which, although avoiding the explicit mention of \"Pocahontas,\" still carries a weight of information about the character of Pocahontas and her place in history. This complexity aligns well with a score of 4 as it demands advanced understanding and detailed knowledge of the subject matter. However, due to its indirect nature and the fact that it requires the questioner to correctly infer the answer, the question could be arguably deemed to be too difficult to score 5. So the overall score is 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What famous orchestral work by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky commemorates the Russian defense against Napoleon's army?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The 1812 Overture\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The 1812 Overture\". The question should not contain the text \"The 1812 Overture\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat famous orchestral work by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky commemorates the Russian defense against Napoleon's army?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given instruction emphasizes the need for a question without explicitly stating the answer, \"The 1812 Overture\". The response provided successfully creates a question that is challenging but solvable, adhering to the guidelines without directly stating the answer. However, while the question does require a certain level of knowledge about Tchaikovsky and the historical context, it lacks the level of complexity suggested by the scoring rubric for a score of 5, which would require highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning. Thus, the response aligns more closely with a score of 4, indicating that the question indeed involves advanced understanding and detailed knowledge but not with the complexity of an extensive calculation. So the overall score is 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What is the distance from the nucleus of an atom to its outermost energy level?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"atomic radius\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"atomic radius\". The question should not contain the text \"atomic radius\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the distance from the nucleus of an atom to its outermost energy level?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated is rather challenging and requires a deep understanding of atomic structure. It directly relates to the atomic radius, but it does not explicitly state \"atomic radius\" as the answer. Instead, it asks for the \"distance from the nucleus of an atom to its outermost energy level,\" which is a more complex way to describe an atomic radius. This approach requires the responder to make a reasonable connection between their knowledge and their ability to apply it to find the \"distance,\" which is a proxy for \"atomic radius.\" While the question's complexity may be seen as its strength, it also creates a potential for confusion or misunderstanding, as the question's wording doesn't clearly express the need for a one-sentence answer that is the actual term, \"atomic radius.\" So the score is 5. [RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Who wrote the 1865 novel "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" under the pseudonym Charles Lutwidge Dodgson?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Lewis Carroll\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Lewis Carroll\". The question should not contain the text \"Lewis Carroll\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho wrote the 1865 novel \"Alice's Adventures in Wonderland\" under the pseudonym Charles Lutwidge Dodgson?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response adheres to the instruction of generating a question that only one person, Lewis Carroll, could answer. The phrasing avoids the explicit mention of \"Lewis Carroll,\" which adds an element of challenge to the question, aligning with the rubric's definition of a moderately challenging question. The question requires an understanding of the work of Lewis Carroll and the context of his pseudonym. It demands knowledge of literary history without being overly complex. The question, being well-structured, invites the answer, \"Lewis Carroll,\" without revealing the identity of the author outright. Therefore, it fulfills the requirement of the task, presenting a moderately challenging question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the maximum speed at which information or matter can travel in the universe, a fundamental constant of the universe that is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"speed of light in a vacuum\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"speed of light in a vacuum\". The question should not contain the text \"speed of light in a vacuum\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the maximum speed at which information or matter can travel in the universe, a fundamental constant of the universe that is approximately 299,792,458 meters per second?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This response presents a question that involves an advanced understanding of complex scientific concepts. It asks about the maximum speed at which information or matter can travel. While the question correctly identifies the value of the speed of light in a vacuum, it also introduces additional information, such as the speed being a 'fundamental constant of the universe', and uses the term 'approximately' which implies a need for further calculations or clarification. This response meets the criteria for a score of 4 because it requires the interlocutor to not only know the speed of light but also to comprehend its significance in the universe, and the mention of 'approximately' adds an extra layer of complexity. The question is not directly solvable by answering with the text \"speed of light in a vacuum\", as it demands additional reasoning or knowledge. So the overall score is 4. [RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who is the current President of Russia who was previously the Director of the Federal Security Service and served as the Prime Minister of Russia from 1999 to 2000, and again from 2008 to 2012?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Vladimir Putin\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Vladimir Putin\". The question should not contain the text \"Vladimir Putin\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the current President of Russia who was previously the Director of the Federal Security Service and served as the Prime Minister of Russia from 1999 to 2000, and again from 2008 to 2012?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is moderately difficult. It provides a series of facts about someone, asking the reader to identify who that someone is. While the question is structured properly and requires an understanding of the roles and leadership of the individual described, it is not overly challenging. The user needs to connect the pieces of information provided in the question to identify the correct answer. This level of complexity makes it a step up from a standard trivia question but still accessible to most users. The question does not directly state the name of the person but instead describes their roles and timeline of leadership. This indirect approach to asking the question adds a layer of difficulty, but it does make the answer feel less obvious. As such, the question, while requiring a bit of reasoning, falls within the range of a moderately difficult question. Hence, the score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What popular sandbox video game, created by Markus "Notch" Persson, allows players to build and explore blocky 3D worlds filled with creatures, resources, and treasures?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Minecraft\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Minecraft\". The question should not contain the text \"Minecraft\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat popular sandbox video game, created by Markus \"Notch\" Persson, allows players to build and explore blocky 3D worlds filled with creatures, resources, and treasures?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the score rubric, the response has successfully created a question that is quite challenging. It requires an advanced understanding of video games, specifically Minecraft. The question is structured to prompt the answerer to think about certain key aspects of Minecraft, such as its creation by Markus \"Notch\" Persson, the style of gameplay, and its core features. While it includes enough information for someone deeply familiar with Minecraft to provide the correct answer, it is also intricate enough to challenge a wider audience. It demands detailed knowledge and the ability to solve a multi-step problem by connecting these elements. This complexity is in line with the \"Very Hard\" category described in the score rubric. Therefore, it is clear that the question is sufficiently demanding for the task at hand. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
In which city did the American Revolution begin with the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Boston\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Boston\". The question should not contain the text \"Boston\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nIn which city did the American Revolution begin with the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated attempts to address the subject matter without explicitly stating the city of Boston, aligning with the instructions. However, it takes a slightly more complex route to arrive at the answer of \"Boston\". It refers to significant historical events that took place in Boston but could confuse the questioner if they are not familiar with these events. This indicates a moderate level of difficulty as it requires an understanding of more complex historical concepts to arrive at the answer. While it may not seem excessively challenging at first, it might be a bit challenging for someone with a rudimentary understanding of American history. The answer to the question does not provide additional context or guidance, which might further confuse the questioner. Therefore, based on the rubric, the question presents a moderate level of difficulty and complexity, which does not quite meet the criteria for a very hard question but is not as simple as a basic knowledge question either. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which novel by Miguel de Cervantes tells the story of a nobleman who becomes obsessed with chivalric romances and sets out on a series of absurd adventures with his squire Sancho Panza?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Don Quijote\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Don Quijote\". The question should not contain the text \"Don Quijote\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich novel by Miguel de Cervantes tells the story of a nobleman who becomes obsessed with chivalric romances and sets out on a series of absurd adventures with his squire Sancho Panza?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is not challenging yet sufficiently complex. It requires the respondent to understand the specificities of a literary work, including its central themes, character arcs, and the nature of its storytelling. This reflects an intermediate level of knowledge and the ability to apply general knowledge to formulate an accurate question. The phrasing of the question avoids directly quoting \"Don Quijote\", adhering to the given instruction. However, it does not require highly specialized knowledge or extensive calculations, as the content of the question can be reasonably approximated without in-depth knowledge. Therefore, it aligns more closely with the description of a score of 3 according to the rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which ancient Mesoamerican culture built elaborate cities, developed a sophisticated system of writing, and made significant advances in astronomy and mathematics?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Mayan civilization\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Mayan civilization\". The question should not contain the text \"Mayan civilization\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich ancient Mesoamerican culture built elaborate cities, developed a sophisticated system of writing, and made significant advances in astronomy and mathematics?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in the response effectively avoids using the phrase \"Mayan civilization\" verbatim and yet it successfully conveys the key attributes of the Mayan civilization. It subtly prompts for knowledge about ancient Mesoamerican cultures, making it an appropriate question for individuals who possess a good understanding of intercultural historical developments. The question is not overly challenging, yet it still requires some level of specialized knowledge and multi-step thinking to understand the answer. It encapsulates the complex concepts and details of Mayan civilization in a way that is intriguing yet accessible. The question is well formulated, avoiding explicit clues about the answer while effectively leading to the correct response. Therefore, the response aligns well with a score of 4 in the score rubric, demonstrating the question's ability to challenge those with advanced understanding. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which iconic bronze sculpture by Auguste Rodin depicts a man sitting on a rock with his chin resting on his hand, deep in thought?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Thinker\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Thinker\". The question should not contain the text \"The Thinker\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich iconic bronze sculpture by Auguste Rodin depicts a man sitting on a rock with his chin resting on his hand, deep in thought?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated requires specialized, yet well-known, art knowledge. It doesn't involve complex reasoning or extensive calculations, but instead requires identification of a specific artwork. This question meets the criteria for a moderate difficulty level. The question is clear and the answer is specific, which aligns with the rubric's requirement for understanding more complex concepts. The formulated question manages to engage the responder with an image and a situation, which is generally more effective in testing one's knowledge than a straightforward question. \n\nHowever, this question could be slightly more challenging by incorporating a slightly more complex descriptive element, to push the score towards a higher difficulty level. It might have included another iconic statue that Rodin is famous for, or required the respondent to understand or analyze additional context related to the sculpture. \n\nIn conclusion, the generated question satisfies the criteria of a moderate difficulty level, providing a challenge that does not overwhelm the responder but still requires a deeper level of understanding than a simple question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What 1972 event led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon in 1974?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Watergate burglary and/or scandal\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Watergate burglary and/or scandal\". The question should not contain the text \"Watergate burglary and/or scandal\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat 1972 event led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon in 1974?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is of moderate difficulty, meeting criteria at a score of 3. It requires some understanding of historical occurrences and the ability to link specific events to their consequences. The question is straightforward enough but also requires the reader to have a basic knowledge of the timeline of events related to the Watergate scandal, specifically the year President Richard Nixon resigned due to the scandal. The question doesn't explicitly mention \"Watergate burglary and/or scandal,\" but it implies the answer directly. Therefore, although the question isn't as complex as one requiring advanced understanding or multi-step problem-solving, it still demonstrates an intermediate understanding of historical facts. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the title of the novel written by Mary Shelley that tells the story of a scientist who creates a monster from dead body parts?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Frankenstein\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Frankenstein\". The question should not contain the text \"Frankenstein\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the novel written by Mary Shelley that tells the story of a scientist who creates a monster from dead body parts?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The provided response offers a question that successfully avoids directly referencing the text \"Frankenstein\". It involves a simple acknowledgment of the novel's content and its author, which makes it a rather basic question. Additionally, the answer is predictably correct and matches the given instruction of what to write. The response is formatted accurately as required, and the language is clear and concise. However, the question's wording is overly simplified and lacks the depth or subtlety that could make it a more challenging question to answer. It simply requests the title of the novel based on its content description, which is a very straightforward task. Therefore, considering the score rubric and the question's simplicity, it is assessed as a question that is very easy to answer. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What are the small, rocky objects that orbit the Sun and are remnants from the formation of our solar system?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"asteroids\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"asteroids\". The question should not contain the text \"asteroids\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat are the small, rocky objects that orbit the Sun and are remnants from the formation of our solar system?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provides a question that can be interpreted as posing for a description of celestial bodies. Although it is a moderate challenge in understanding that these \"small, rocky objects\" are known as \"asteroids,\" the question lacks the specificity that would immediately lead to the correct answer. It does not mention the term \"asteroids\" directly, and therefore, does not meet the criteria of the task. The question may require some background knowledge to be fully answered. It doesn't demand the specialized knowledge of finding \"asteroids\" in a complex reasoning process but leans more towards a moderate problem-solving task. Therefore, although it is not entirely straightforward, it isn't highly specialized either. The question involves a degree of complexity but doesn't quite reach the level of a VERY difficult question. Hence, we would assign the question a moderate score, given the score rubric and the nature of the task. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who wrote the novel "War and Peace", which is considered one of the longest novels ever written, with over 587,000 words?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Leo Tolstoy\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Leo Tolstoy\". The question should not contain the text \"Leo Tolstoy\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho wrote the novel \"War and Peace\", which is considered one of the longest novels ever written, with over 587,000 words?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in the response does not directly contain the text \"Leo Tolstoy\". However, it effectively infers the correct answer due to the additional context provided, such as the title of the novel \"War and Peace\" and its length. This implicit reference to the novel is sufficient in guiding a knowledgeable individual towards the correct answer. The complexity level required to answer the question accurately is moderate, as it does not demand highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning but a basic understanding of the literary context. So, the question is neither overly simplistic nor highly complex. The answer provided by the respondent is \"Leo Tolstoy\", as per the instruction. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What mathematical operation is the inverse of squaring a number?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"square root\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"square root\". The question should not contain the text \"square root\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat mathematical operation is the inverse of squaring a number?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided here is a direct question related to a mathematical operation. It asks for the inverse operation of squaring a number. However, it fails to make use of mathematical terminology or phrasing that would challenge someone's knowledge beyond a superficial level. The question is formulated in such a way that the answer is an inevitable assumption, not necessarily a product of deeper mathematical understanding or reasoning. This makes the question fall into the category of \"Very Easy\", as it doesn't require the application of any complex concepts or advanced knowledge beyond basic arithmetic. Consequently, even though the question does address a valid mathematical concept, it does not pose a significant challenge for someone looking to test their understanding of more intricate mathematical principles. \n\nSo the overall score is 1, as the question does not meet the requirements of the higher scoring categories. It is quite easy, and the answer is a straightforward assumption given the phrasing of the question. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Which state is known as the "Volunteer State" and is home to the country music scene in Nashville?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Tennessee\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Tennessee\". The question should not contain the text \"Tennessee\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich state is known as the \"Volunteer State\" and is home to the country music scene in Nashville?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question given in the response is moderate in difficulty. It requires the knowledge of the state's nickname and the cultural significance of the state. The question doesn't explicitly mention the word \"Tennessee\" but relies on the interlocutor to correctly identify the state based on the provided clues. It strikes a balance between requiring a substantial amount of general knowledge and being accessible for an intermediate understanding. The question seems to assume a familiarity with American states and their cultural attributes, which is essential in a question of this nature. The answer is correct and the question fits the criteria outlined in the score rubric. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What property of a wave is measured in hertz?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"frequency\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"frequency\". The question should not contain the text \"frequency\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat property of a wave is measured in hertz?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is well-structured and is quite challenging due to the lack of explicit mention of \"frequency\". It requires the reader to connect the concept of \"hertz\" to the idea of \"frequency\" without being told so directly. This question requires a moderate to advanced understanding of physics, specifically in the context of waves, to answer it accurately, hence aligning with a score of 4 on the rubric. So the overall score is 4. [RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What is the highest peak on Honshu, the largest island of Japan?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Mount Fuji\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Mount Fuji\". The question should not contain the text \"Mount Fuji\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the highest peak on Honshu, the largest island of Japan?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question correctly identifies that \"Mount Fuji\" is the answer but effectively avoids using the actual location name in the question. It demonstrates a simple request for information that requires no specialized knowledge or advanced reasoning to solve, making it an easy question to answer, which aligns with a score of 2 in the rubric. The question also encourages the responder to apply common knowledge, which is not highly specialized. Therefore, the response meets the criteria outlined in the score rubric by being very easy. It is not overly simplistic, as it does require some level of cultural awareness to identify Mount Fuji as the highest peak in Honshu, an island of Japan. Based on these factors, the score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Which ancient Greek city-state was known for its rigorous military training and was the birthplace of King Leonidas?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Sparta\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Sparta\". The question should not contain the text \"Sparta\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich ancient Greek city-state was known for its rigorous military training and was the birthplace of King Leonidas?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provided is an example of a very challenging question, in line with a score of 4 according to the scoring rubric. The question posed is not explicitly saying \"Sparta\" but it alludes to Sparta, making it quite difficult to know that the answer is indeed \"Sparta\". It involves recognizing historical connections and understanding Sparta's significance in Greek history, especially the reference to King Leonidas, which might be an advanced knowledge for many. This complexity and the need for a wider scope of knowledge align with the requirement for a question that demands advanced understanding. The question requires the inquirer to make a direct connection, not merely answer a basic question about a city's identity, but to connect the historical significance of that city to a specific figure in Greek history. This kind of multi-step reasoning is what makes this question harder compared to others. Therefore, the response successfully meets the criteria for a challenging question. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which tragic play by William Shakespeare tells the story of two young lovers from feuding families who fall in love and ultimately die in each other's arms?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Romeo and Juliet\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Romeo and Juliet\". The question should not contain the text \"Romeo and Juliet\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich tragic play by William Shakespeare tells the story of two young lovers from feuding families who fall in love and ultimately die in each other's arms?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the score rubric, the question is formulated in a manner that requires advanced understanding and detailed knowledge. It involves a multi-step problem-solving approach to correctly deduce that the play referred to is \"Romeo and Juliet\". The framing of the question allows for the interpretation of a description of the play, rather than explicitly mentioning the title which adheres to the instruction. The complexity of the question's nature lies in the ability of the inquirer to recognize and answer to the intricate details of the play plot without directly referencing the title, which demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the subject matter. Therefore, given the depth of comprehension this question entails, it aligns with the criteria for a score of 5 according to the rubric. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What process allows some animals, such as salamanders and certain fish, to regrow lost limbs or organs?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"regeneration\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"regeneration\". The question should not contain the text \"regeneration\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat process allows some animals, such as salamanders and certain fish, to regrow lost limbs or organs?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question clearly demonstrates a moderate difficulty level. It requires some knowledge about biological processes, specifically the ability of certain animals to regenerate. While the question does not explicitly state the term \"regeneration,\" it implies a need for understanding this concept. The question engages with the idea of animals regrowing lost body parts, which is a complex but intermediate concept. It asks for the process that enables this capability, but the question is posed in a way that the answer is obvious, making it a bit harder than a simple query. This is why the question warrants a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the ancient Greek philosopher who was sentenced to death by drinking hemlock for "corrupting the youth" of Athens?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Socrates\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Socrates\". The question should not contain the text \"Socrates\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the ancient Greek philosopher who was sentenced to death by drinking hemlock for \"corrupting the youth\" of Athens?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provided a question that is quite accessible. It relies on a well-known historical figure, Socrates, as the answer, and it outlines the cause of his execution. The question does not state the name \"Socrates\", which meets the instruction. It captures the essence of an ancient Greek philosopher who was sentenced to death. However, it doesn't fully leverage the concept of 'no possible question exists' as stated in the rubric. \n\nThe response, while meeting the requirements of the task, is more of a quiz-style question, which is not as challenging or as complex as a question demanding advanced understanding or multi-step problem-solving might be. It lacks the depth and complexity that would push the evaluation of the rubric towards higher scores. The question is somewhat straightforward and does not require extensive knowledge beyond what is presented in the question. Therefore, it is evaluated as a lower-level challenge based on the complexity and nature of the question as compared to the levels outlined in the rubric. \n\nBased on these observations and adherence to the rubric, the score is 1. [RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the Old Norse name for the realm of the gods in Norse mythology?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Asgardr\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Asgardr\". The question should not contain the text \"Asgardr\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the Old Norse name for the realm of the gods in Norse mythology?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is relevant and does seek a specific answer. However, the question does not meet the requirement of being challenging. The answer, \"Asgardr,\" is straightforward and does not require any complex understanding or problem-solving. It is simply a matter of remembering the correct name. Therefore, it doesn't align well with the scoring rubric as it falls into the 'Very Easy' category, which would not be scored above a 1. The question does not demonstrate any of the advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving that would elevate its difficulty. In conclusion, this question lacks the complexity necessary to meet the criteria of a higher score. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the capital city of China that hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Beijing\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Beijing\". The question should not contain the text \"Beijing\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the capital city of China that hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response \"What is the capital city of China that hosted the 2008 Summer Olympics?\" effectively poses a question without using the word \"Beijing.\" It relies on common knowledge about the Olympics and nations' capitals, making it a relatively straightforward question to answer for anyone with basic geography and historical knowledge. However, it doesn't demonstrate any advanced understanding or problem-solving capabilities, nor does it require extensive calculations or highly specialized knowledge. The question, while straightforward, doesn't delve into complex reasoning. Thus, based on the score rubric, the question would be considered 'easy.' \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the title of the famous orchestral suite composed by Gustav Holst between 1914 and 1916, which consists of seven movements, each representing a planet in our solar system?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Planets\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Planets\". The question should not contain the text \"The Planets\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the famous orchestral suite composed by Gustav Holst between 1914 and 1916, which consists of seven movements, each representing a planet in our solar system?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the score rubric, the response provided a question that is of moderate difficulty. It involves an intermediate understanding of classical music history. The question requires knowledge of Gustav Holst's works and the ability to recognize the connection between the seven movements in his orchestral suite and the planets in our solar system. This knowledge reflects a more complex understanding than the one required for a score of 1 or 2, which primarily involve basic knowledge or simple calculations. However, it does not reach the advanced level or the extensive calculations one would expect for a score of 5. Therefore, according to the criteria set by the score rubric, the level of difficulty for the question provided is moderate. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the strong acid produced in the stomach that helps to break down food and has a pH of around 1.5 to 3.5?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"hydrochloric acid\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"hydrochloric acid\". The question should not contain the text \"hydrochloric acid\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the strong acid produced in the stomach that helps to break down food and has a pH of around 1.5 to 3.5?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated is indeed challenging enough to be a level 4 question on the score rubric. It requires an in-depth understanding of human digestion, and the mention of the pH range suggests an awareness of the chemical composition of gastric juices. However, the question could be more challenging by asking for the chemical formula and describing the acids produced in more detail, which would suggest a need for more advanced knowledge or multi-step problem-solving. So the final score is 4, because the question, although relatively complex, does not quite reach the extensive problem-solving skills implied in the level 5. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What are the individual symbols that make up the alphabet?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"letters\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"letters\". The question should not contain the text \"letters\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat are the individual symbols that make up the alphabet?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed is indeed related to the concept of letters as it refers to the symbols in the alphabet. However, the phrasing of the question does not strictly follow the instructions. An ideal question should explicitly state \"letters\" as the answer, as was done in the instruction. While the question about the symbols of the alphabet could potentially be answered with \"letters\", the specific phrasing \"individual symbols that make up the alphabet\" suggests a broader range of possible answers, such as individual letters, the structure of the characters, or even linguistic aspects. This indicates a moderate challenge level as per the score rubric, as the question requires some level of understanding, but it does not meet the requirement of a question that necessitates the answer \"letters\". Therefore, while the response does attempt to address the concept of letters, it does not align perfectly with the instructions given. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the American singer-songwriter behind the 2021 debut single "Drivers License", which broke multiple records and became a global phenomenon?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Olivia Rodrigo\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Olivia Rodrigo\". The question should not contain the text \"Olivia Rodrigo\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the American singer-songwriter behind the 2021 debut single \"Drivers License\", which broke multiple records and became a global phenomenon?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is quite complex, requiring knowledge about recent record-breaking singles, breaking the records of other artists, and becoming a global phenomenon. Such specific details imply a high level of understanding of current music trends. The answer \"Olivia Rodrigo\" would be obvious to those familiar with the recent music landscape. However, it would be a challenging task for someone unfamiliar with these areas, thus aligning with the score rubric, where a score of 4 is given for a question that requires advanced understanding. The question poses a complex problem that requires a detailed knowledge base to answer accurately. Therefore, the question meets the criteria for a hard question demanding advanced understanding. \n\nThe question's intricacy and the expertise needed to answer it directly reflect the rubric's definition for a score of 4. The question involves multiple aspects, such as identifying the artist, understanding the significance of the records broken, and recognizing the artist's impact globally. This shows that the question requires a multi-step problem-solving approach. Therefore, the generated question is a strong example of a question that is hard to answer, meeting the rubric's requirements. \n\n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
On which day do Christians celebrate the resurrection of Jesus Christ, which is a movable feast that is not fixed to a specific date but is always on a Sunday?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Easter Sunday\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Easter Sunday\". The question should not contain the text \"Easter Sunday\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nOn which day do Christians celebrate the resurrection of Jesus Christ, which is a movable feast that is not fixed to a specific date but is always on a Sunday?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response is appropriate as per the initial instruction. It asks a question about the significance and the days on which the celebration of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, or Easter Sunday, occurs, without explicitly stating the answer. The question is moderately challenging as it requires understanding of more complex concepts such as the significance of Easter Sunday and its relation to movable feasts and the Christian calendar. Additionally, the question hints at some intermediate calculations regarding the timing of the feast, thereby involving a level of problem-solving. Therefore, the response aligns well with the criteria set out in the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the highest peak in the Himalayas and the highest mountain above sea level on Earth?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Mount Everest\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Mount Everest\". The question should not contain the text \"Mount Everest\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the highest peak in the Himalayas and the highest mountain above sea level on Earth?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is quite challenging as it not only requires detailed knowledge of the Himalayas but also the ability to apply that knowledge to a broader, global context. It demands recognition of Mount Everest as the highest peak in the Himalayas, its unique status as the highest mountain above sea level, and the ability to deduce this by identifying its unique features among other peaks in the same range. This task involves high levels of specialized knowledge and complex reasoning, which is why it deserves a high score of 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What is the hottest part of our planet, with temperatures ranging from 5,000 to 6,000 degrees Celsius?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Earth’s core\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Earth’s core\". The question should not contain the text \"Earth’s core\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the hottest part of our planet, with temperatures ranging from 5,000 to 6,000 degrees Celsius?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is indeed thought-provoking, yet it is rather straightforward, fitting within the easy to moderate challenge level. While the specific temperatures provided are interesting, they are not critical to the challenge as the question seeks to identify \"the hottest part of our planet.\" The question's directness and the use of a common concept, such as identifying the hottest part, make it appropriate within the score rubric's parameters. The answer, \"Earth’s core,\" is directly accessible to the questioner, demonstrating an understanding of basic knowledge about our planet. Despite the specificities of the question, the general concept of identifying the hottest part remains clear and achievable within the score rubric's context. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who was the commander-in-chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War and later became the first President of the United States?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"George Washington\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"George Washington\". The question should not contain the text \"George Washington\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the commander-in-chief of the Continental Army during the American Revolutionary War and later became the first President of the United States?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response is a perfect example of a complex question involving historical knowledge and reasoning. The query is crafted in a way that does not explicitly mention George Washington, thus ensuring that the answer is only available when the person responding comprehends the interconnectedness of historical events and their outcomes. It successfully combines multiple historical aspects, including the military role during the revolution, the subsequent post as the first President of the United States, and the overall significance of the individual in question. This complexity aligns with the score rubric, which defines a question deserving a score of 5 as one that requires \"highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\" There's also an implicit expectation of memory recall and the ability to identify and apply the information accurately. Therefore, the response is not only well-formed but also appropriately challenging for the intended audience. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the title of the Edgar Allan Poe poem that begins with the line "Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Raven\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Raven\". The question should not contain the text \"The Raven\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the Edgar Allan Poe poem that begins with the line \"Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered, weak and weary\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is a moderate one, requiring a general understanding of literary works. However, it does not fully align with the provided instructions, which stated the answer must be \"The Raven\", yet the question itself includes an extended quote from \"The Raven\". This inclusion goes against the task requirements and thus reduces the effectiveness of the question. It would be better for the question to focus on distinct elements such as a specific poem or a notable characteristic without revealing the answer. Therefore, while the question does require a moderate level of knowledge, its connection to the answer \"The Raven\" is rather weak. Additionally, the format of the question was not included, as per the instructions. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
In which city is the United States Capitol Building located?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Washington, D.C.\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Washington, D.C.\". The question should not contain the text \"Washington, D.C.\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nIn which city is the United States Capitol Building located?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question given is highly straightforward and does not invoke the need for complex reasonings or advanced understanding to arrive at the correct answer. It is a basic query that can be answered by anyone with even a cursory knowledge of United States geography. This question adheres to the instruction of generating a one-sentence question where the only possible answer is \"Washington, D.C.\". Therefore, since the question challenges the answerer at the level of basic knowledge, it is suitable for the criteria set for the score rubric. In summary, the question's simplicity and directness make it suitable for a score of 1 according to the rubric. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What genre of ancient drama is characterized by a heroic protagonist who suffers a downfall due to a tragic flaw or error in judgment?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Greek tragedy\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Greek tragedy\". The question should not contain the text \"Greek tragedy\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat genre of ancient drama is characterized by a heroic protagonist who suffers a downfall due to a tragic flaw or error in judgment?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question asks the respondent to identify a genre of ancient drama specifically characterized by a heroic protagonist's downfall due to a tragic flaw or error in judgment. While the question provides a clear context, it lacks the direct mention of \"Greek tragedy\" as instructed. However, the question is challenging and requires an advanced understanding of ancient dramas, as it pertains to the identification of a distinct dramatic genre, which is central to the instruction. This is in contrast to the easier task of asking for \"Greek tragedy\" directly. Thus, although the question's formulation slightly deviates from the instruction, it still presents a significant level of difficulty and complexity that aligns well with the rubric description. Therefore, the score is 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What fundamental property of an object causes it to resist changes in its motion or rest?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"inertia\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"inertia\". The question should not contain the text \"inertia\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat fundamental property of an object causes it to resist changes in its motion or rest?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is very challenging as it doesn't explicitly use the word \"inertia,\" yet requires a sophisticated understanding of physics. The question calls for an advanced concept of an object's resistance to change in its motion or rest, which directly refers to the principle of inertia. The question demands advanced understanding of physics, making it complex and requiring detailed knowledge to answer it correctly, which aligns it to the highest difficulty level of the rubric. Therefore, the score is 5. [RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Which continent is entirely contained within the Antarctic Circle?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Antarctica\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Antarctica\". The question should not contain the text \"Antarctica\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich continent is entirely contained within the Antarctic Circle?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]While the given question does not directly mention \"Antarctica\" and instead refers to the \"Antarctic Circle,\" it is evident that the question is designed to elicit the correct answer, which is indeed \"Antarctica.\" This question demonstrates a reasonable level of complexity, which is neither too easy nor overly difficult. It requires the respondent to make a logical connection between the \"Antarctic Circle\" and its geographical location. The respondent needs to understand that the circle is named after Antarctica and is a region in the southern hemisphere, leading to the correct answer. Therefore, the question does not fall into the category of an extremely hard question but instead requires a moderate level of knowledge and understanding. Hence, the score is 3, as the question involves understanding more complex concepts, fitting between moderate and hard levels of challenge. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which Hindu deity is often depicted with a third eye on their forehead and is associated with destruction and transformation?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Shiva\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Shiva\". The question should not contain the text \"Shiva\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich Hindu deity is often depicted with a third eye on their forehead and is associated with destruction and transformation?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response effectively formulates a question that fits the instruction, requiring no explicit mention of \"Shiva\". The question is constructed in a way that invites a detailed answer, yet due to the instruction's requirement, the answer can only be \"Shiva.\" Furthermore, the question presented demands a certain level of specialized knowledge in religious and cultural contexts. The answer would require a strong background in the subject, which adds an element of difficulty to the question. Therefore, the question can be deemed challenging and is neither too easy nor too difficult, hence aligning with a score of 4 according to the rubric. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What process involves the separation of a mixture based on differences in boiling points, resulting in the purification of a liquid?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"distillation\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"distillation\". The question should not contain the text \"distillation\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat process involves the separation of a mixture based on differences in boiling points, resulting in the purification of a liquid?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST] The question has been effectively crafted to meet the instruction's requirement for a possible question that would result in \"distillation\" as an answer. The question avoids the direct use of the word \"distillation\" while still referring to it indirectly through a description of its process. The question demonstrates a moderate level of complexity. It involves the application of common knowledge regarding the process of separation and purification but requires a deeper understanding of the boiling point differences that underlie this process. Thus, while not overly complex, the question does engage with more complex concepts, which are required to arrive at the answer \"distillation\". This aligns with the score rubric's definition for moderate difficulty, where understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations is required. So, the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which American League team plays their home games at Guaranteed Rate Field?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Chicago White Sox\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Chicago White Sox\". The question should not contain the text \"Chicago White Sox\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich American League team plays their home games at Guaranteed Rate Field?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question does provide enough context to deduce the correct answer. It leverages the fact that \"Guaranteed Rate Field\" is a public venue typically associated with a sports team. The question requires no specific knowledge beyond a general awareness of American sports and the existence of the Chicago White Sox. However, it does not reach the same level of complexity as the highest scoring question might. It is a less challenging question as it involves straightforward application of common knowledge, rather than intricate problem-solving or specialized knowledge. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What major event in the mid-19th century drew thousands of prospectors to the West Coast of the United States in search of wealth and riches?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"California gold rush\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"California gold rush\". The question should not contain the text \"California gold rush\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat major event in the mid-19th century drew thousands of prospectors to the West Coast of the United States in search of wealth and riches?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response effectively adheres to the instruction by creating a question that leads to an answer without the explicit mention of \"California gold rush\". Although the sentence structure may seem a bit complex, it's designed to test a broad understanding of historical events without directly referencing the term to be recognized, which is consistent with the task. The question is posed in a way that requires a fair degree of reasoning and advanced understanding of the period known for a gold rush in California. \n\nThe question is not excessively complex or difficult to answer, but it does require a level of expertise beyond basic knowledge. This meets the criteria for a score of 4 in the score rubric, as the question demands a higher level of historical understanding, as opposed to a straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts. Therefore, the response aligns closely with the scoring rubric for a score of 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What does a military band typically perform during a parade?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"marches\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"marches\". The question should not contain the text \"marches\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat does a military band typically perform during a parade?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed is straightforward and utilizes common knowledge, which is in accordance with a score of 2 on the rubric. It does not require extensive calculation or complex reasoning, as indicated in the rubric. The question focuses on typical performances by a military band during a parade, and as a result, the answer is \"marches\". This demonstrates ease in comprehending the query and the correct response is readily derived from the provided context. The question and answer are clear and concise, making it an appropriate level of difficulty in terms of knowledge application. Therefore, based on the criteria outlined in the score rubric, the response is deemed to be of moderate difficulty. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the title of George Orwell's 1945 allegorical novella that tells the story of a group of barnyard animals who rebel against their human oppressors and establish their own government?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Animal Farm\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Animal Farm\". The question should not contain the text \"Animal Farm\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of George Orwell's 1945 allegorical novella that tells the story of a group of barnyard animals who rebel against their human oppressors and establish their own government?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is very challenging as it requires the respondent to have a high level of understanding of George Orwell's work and the ability to summarize a complex narrative in a concise manner. It does not take into consideration the possibility that the respondent might not be familiar with Orwell's work or be able to effectively articulate the plot of the novella. The question implies a certain degree of specialized knowledge in literature and criticism, making it difficult for a general audience to provide an accurate response. This difficulty in answering the question with a high degree of confidence and accuracy, based on the score rubric, justifies the score for this question. So the overall score is 5. [RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What type of aircraft is capable of hovering in place, taking off and landing vertically, and is often used for search and rescue, medical transport, and military operations?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"helicopters\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"helicopters\". The question should not contain the text \"helicopters\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of aircraft is capable of hovering in place, taking off and landing vertically, and is often used for search and rescue, medical transport, and military operations?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is a precise and clear inquiry about an aircraft that matches certain unique characteristics, which include hovering, vertical take-off and landing, and specific uses like search and rescue, medical transport, and military operations. This question could be answered with a description of the aircraft, but the correct answer should specifically state \"helicopters\" due to the criteria specified in the task. The question is comprehensive and would require a person to have a certain degree of understanding or knowledge about aviation and helicopters to answer it correctly. The language used in the question is straightforward and doesn't need advanced knowledge to understand it, thus making it a moderate challenge according to the rubric. It demonstrates an intermediate understanding of aviation concepts and terminology, but not complex reasoning or extensive calculations, which would have pushed it towards a higher score. In conclusion, based on the given score rubric, the question is moderately challenging. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What type of ecosystem is characterized by saturated or flooded soil conditions and is home to a diverse range of plant and animal species?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"wetlands\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"wetlands\". The question should not contain the text \"wetlands\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of ecosystem is characterized by saturated or flooded soil conditions and is home to a diverse range of plant and animal species?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter, touching on the characteristics of a wetland ecosystem, such as saturated soil conditions and a diverse range of species. However, it doesn't explicitly ask about the term \"wetlands\", which is the answer according to the instructions. Instead, it provides a broader description that might include various types of ecosystems, not necessarily wetlands. While the question poses an interesting topic and requires some knowledge, it lacks the specificity needed for the answer to be \"wetlands\". The question is challenging, but not to the extent of being \"very hard\" as it doesn't directly ask for that specific term. Therefore, based on the score rubric, the question's challenge is moderate. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who designed the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York City, the Robie House in Chicago, and Fallingwater in Pennsylvania?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Frank Lloyd Wright\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Frank Lloyd Wright\". The question should not contain the text \"Frank Lloyd Wright\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho designed the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in New York City, the Robie House in Chicago, and Fallingwater in Pennsylvania?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This challenge presents a question with multiple components that would require a moderate understanding of various structures and their respective designers. The question is aimed at identifying the architect who designed three different buildings. However, it does contain some information which could potentially lead to the correct answer, thus making it slightly less challenging than expected. The task does not require a thorough knowledge of architecture but certainly needs an intermediate understanding of notable buildings and their designers. So, it is more aligned with a score of 3, as it requires some complexity and consideration of several factors. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which sector is responsible for the production and distribution of cattle meat for human consumption?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"beef industry\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"beef industry\". The question should not contain the text \"beef industry\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich sector is responsible for the production and distribution of cattle meat for human consumption?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question asks a clear, concise question about which sector is involved in the production and distribution of cattle meat for human consumption. The answer is indeed \"beef industry,\" which is the one correct answer as defined by the score rubric. The question involves the application of common knowledge about cattle meat production, not an explicit or covert reference to \"beef industry\" as stated in the instruction, which makes the question appropriate for a score of 3. However, there's room for a more challenging question that goes beyond the basic level of understanding and provides a more nuanced understanding of the complex industry, such as incorporating aspects related to market dynamics, global trade, or consumer preferences. The complexity of such an industry would justify a higher score, making the question more aligned with the level of difficulty specified in the score rubric. In summary, while the generated question adheres to the constraints of the task, there's potential to make it more challenging, which would warrant a higher score. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter in mathematics?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"pi\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"pi\". The question should not contain the text \"pi\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter in mathematics?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question in the response aligns well with a moderate difficulty level. It reflects the necessity of understanding more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. This is due to the specific mathematical formula related to the circumference, diameter, and the square root of 2. The answer to the question is indeed \"pi\". The question itself successfully navigates around the explicit mention of the word \"pi\" while formulating the question that is mathematically equivalent. The nature of the response fulfills the instruction provided, though not as concisely as a perfect response. The challenge in answering this question could be associated with an understanding of the formula, the relevant operations within, and the ability to manipulate equations. However, if one possesses the foundational knowledge of geometric equations and basic calculus, this question becomes less challenging. Hence, in this assessment, the question's challenging nature is well balanced between simplicity and complexity, aligning with the criteria of moderately difficult question as indicated in the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which Greek god was often depicted carrying a thyrsus and was associated with wine, festivals, and ecstasy?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Dionysus\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Dionysus\". The question should not contain the text \"Dionysus\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich Greek god was often depicted carrying a thyrsus and was associated with wine, festivals, and ecstasy?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the provided score rubric, the question is well within the moderate difficulty range. It requires an understanding of Greek mythology, specifically Dionysus, and a knowledge of his associated symbolic items, such as the thyrsus. The question cleverly avoids directly asking for the name of the god, which is the focus of the instruction. However, to answer it, one must understand cultural and historical context. It is an intermediate calculation as it does not demand an in-depth or extensive knowledge. It does not involve highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning, which makes it a moderate question in line with the score rubric's description for a score of 3. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What novel by Louisa May Alcott follows the lives of four sisters, Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy, as they come of age during the Civil War era in New England?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Little Women\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Little Women\". The question should not contain the text \"Little Women\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat novel by Louisa May Alcott follows the lives of four sisters, Meg, Jo, Beth, and Amy, as they come of age during the Civil War era in New England?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is moderately challenging as it involves the understanding of specific characters and events related to a particular novel. It requires knowledge of Louisa May Alcott's work and the time period it was set in. The question demands the respondent to recall and correctly mention the names of the four sisters and the setting of the novel, displaying intermediate knowledge of the novel's plot and context. The respondent could potentially identify the novel based on the provided clues without having to state the title directly. Therefore, it scores a 3 on the score rubric as it requires understanding of more complex concepts but is not highly specialized or overly detailed. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the German mathematician and astronomer who discovered the three laws of planetary motion that describe the paths of the planets around the Sun?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Johannes Kepler\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Johannes Kepler\". The question should not contain the text \"Johannes Kepler\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the German mathematician and astronomer who discovered the three laws of planetary motion that describe the paths of the planets around the Sun?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed is a direct inquiry seeking a specific historical figure based on the given information. It does not require complex understanding or extensive calculations to arrive at the answer, which is Johannes Kepler. It is a question rooted in basic knowledge of history and mathematics, involving straightforward application of common knowledge, specifically the details of Kepler's three laws of planetary motion. Therefore, it aligns well with the score rubric for an easy challenge. The answer is correctly presented, which adds to the quality of the response. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who was the English monarch often referred to as the "Virgin Queen" and ruled from 1558 to 1603?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Elizabeth I\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Elizabeth I\". The question should not contain the text \"Elizabeth I\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the English monarch often referred to as the \"Virgin Queen\" and ruled from 1558 to 1603?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented requires a moderate level of historical knowledge, which suggests an intermediate understanding of monarchs and their reigns. It does not rely on advanced or highly specialized knowledge but does necessitate an awareness of the timeline and the titles and reigns of English monarchs, which are more complex concepts in comparison to the most basic question that could be asked. As per the score rubric, the question is moderately challenging, hence, earning a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the American actor and Confederate sympathizer who assassinated President Abraham Lincoln at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C. on April 14, 1865?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"John Wilkes Booth\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"John Wilkes Booth\". The question should not contain the text \"John Wilkes Booth\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the American actor and Confederate sympathizer who assassinated President Abraham Lincoln at Ford's Theatre in Washington, D.C. on April 14, 1865?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is clearly related to the given instruction. It includes a specific name and historical context without mentioning \"John Wilkes Booth\". Additionally, the question would be considered very easy as it requires basic knowledge of American history to generate the correct answer. It's formulated in a way that would be understood by a broad audience without requiring detailed knowledge or extensive calculations. The question's complexity is just right to be both challenging and accessible, adhering to the balance struck in the scoring criteria. It also matches the description for a score 1 in the rubric, which is given to very easy questions that require basic knowledge or a simple calculation. Therefore, the generated question demonstrates a clear understanding of the instruction and successfully fits the criteria outlined in the rubric for a score of 1. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the name of the famous piano sonata by Ludwig van Beethoven that is also known as "Piano Sonata No. 14 in C-sharp minor, Op. 27, No. 2"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Moonlight Sonata\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Moonlight Sonata\". The question should not contain the text \"Moonlight Sonata\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the name of the famous piano sonata by Ludwig van Beethoven that is also known as \"Piano Sonata No. 14 in C-sharp minor, Op. 27, No. 2\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The score 5 is suitable for the given response as it successfully meets the criteria of the score rubric, namely, the response showcases advanced knowledge and a high level of challenge in the question. While the question asks for the name of the sonata by Beethoven, it does so using multiple alternative names, thereby showcasing various facets of the question's answer and requiring a comprehensive understanding. This level of complexity in the question also suggests a complex reasoning process leading to the answer, which is indicative of superior problem-solving skills. Furthermore, the format of the response aligns with the given instruction, maintaining a similar level of detail and avoiding the explicit mention of the sonata's title. The absence of the explicit text \"Moonlight Sonata\" also reflects a higher level of sophistication, aligning well with the rubric's definition for a score of 5. Therefore, the response exhibits an exceptional understanding of the task, and as such, it receives the highest score. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What novella by Franz Kafka tells the story of a traveling salesman who wakes up one morning to find himself transformed into a giant insect?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Metamorphosis\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Metamorphosis\". The question should not contain the text \"The Metamorphosis\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat novella by Franz Kafka tells the story of a traveling salesman who wakes up one morning to find himself transformed into a giant insect?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question, while still relatively straightforward, is somewhat more challenging than the one presented in the previous response. The question here involves a bit more advanced understanding of literature, specifically that of Franz Kafka. It requires knowledge of certain key elements from \"The Metamorphosis\", such as the protagonist's transformation and the novel's genre. The question, therefore, is more intermediate than basic in terms of requiring the application of common knowledge of literary works. This fits the score rubric's criteria for a \"Moderate\" difficulty question. However, it does not fully reach the level of a challenging question, such as one that would require multi-step problem-solving or extensive calculations. The answer \"The Metamorphosis\" can be provided with a level of certainty that is only moderate, as it requires a certain level of understanding of the book to provide an accurate response. In contrast, the previous question could be answered with a level of certainty nearly equivalent to a mathematical question, given its simplicity. This, therefore, provides a reasonable justification for the specific score given in this response. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the flavor of the fruit that is typically red, sweet, and often eaten with shortcake?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"strawberry\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"strawberry\". The question should not contain the text \"strawberry\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the flavor of the fruit that is typically red, sweet, and often eaten with shortcake?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question demonstrates a moderate level of difficulty. It relies on the respondent's knowledge of fruits and their attributes, which indicates a basic knowledge. However, the question does not explicitly use the word \"strawberry\", as required by the instruction, which may add a layer of difficulty for respondents. They will need to apply their knowledge of fruit characteristics to identify the answer, showing an intermediate level of problem-solving. Additionally, the question incorporates a common scenario—eating strawberries with shortcake—which may aid in recalling the correct answer. Furthermore, the question doesn't require complex reasoning or extensive calculations, which is why it doesn't fall into the highest category of scoring. \n\nSo, taking into account the rubric criteria, the question posed is a good balance between simplicity and complexity, and thus it fits the score of 3, which indicates that the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What innate, unlearned tendency drives animals to perform complex behaviors without prior experience or training?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"instinct\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"instinct\". The question should not contain the text \"instinct\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat innate, unlearned tendency drives animals to perform complex behaviors without prior experience or training?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response successfully creates a question that is both interesting and conceptually challenging. It is framed in a way that prompts the reader to contemplate complex biological concepts, yet it remains approachable by focusing on a general observation of animal behavior. The question requires a level of thoughtfulness and understanding of biology, but it avoids overly technical language, making it accessible to a broad range of audiences. It subtly introduces the idea of instinct without explicitly using the term, which aligns with the instruction provided. Therefore, it meets the criteria for a challenging question that still allows for a simple answer. The question is nuanced, yet still requires a limited amount of specialized knowledge to answer it correctly. So the overall score is 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What prehistoric monument in England is composed of large, upright stones surrounded by earthworks that form a ceremonial enclosure?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Stonehenge\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Stonehenge\". The question should not contain the text \"Stonehenge\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat prehistoric monument in England is composed of large, upright stones surrounded by earthworks that form a ceremonial enclosure?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question aligns well with the instruction, as it successfully avoids mentioning \"Stonehenge\" in the question text. The question, however, might be considered slightly less challenging than expected, given that the description provided for \"Stonehenge\" is relatively clear and identifiable. While it does ask about a specific site in England, which requires some level of geographical knowledge, it does not delve into any advanced concepts or calculations that would elevate the level of challenge. So, in light of the scoring rubric, it might be more appropriate to label this question as moderate, recognizing the intermediate level of geographical and historical knowledge required to identify \"Stonehenge.\" \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the Egyptian pharaoh whose tomb, discovered by Howard Carter in 1922, was found to be nearly intact with thousands of artifacts and treasures still in place?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"King Tut\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"King Tut\". The question should not contain the text \"King Tut\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the Egyptian pharaoh whose tomb, discovered by Howard Carter in 1922, was found to be nearly intact with thousands of artifacts and treasures still in place?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated in the response demonstrates a reasonable level of difficulty as it asks for the identity of the Egyptian pharaoh known for his nearly intact tomb and the discovery made by Howard Carter. However, since \"King Tut\" is the correct answer, it would be easier to provide that answer rather than pose a question of this nature. While it does meet the given instruction, it might be more challenging to come to the conclusion that \"King Tut\" is the correct answer, given the question's emphasis on the tomb and the discovery made by Howard Carter. So, it takes a bit more thought for a layperson to deduce the answer, but it also provides a richer context that aids in the identification of the pharaoh. Based on this, the question has a moderate level of difficulty suitable for someone with intermediate knowledge of Egyptian history. Therefore, the response would be scored a 3 according to the rubric provided. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What constitutional power allows the President of the United States to forgive federal crimes and restore rights to individuals convicted of them?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"presidential pardons\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"presidential pardons\". The question should not contain the text \"presidential pardons\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat constitutional power allows the President of the United States to forgive federal crimes and restore rights to individuals convicted of them?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]While the response adheres to the requirements by forming a sentence question that seeks information about presidential pardons without explicitly mentioning the term, it lacks the sophistication expected from the rubric's high scores. The question is indeed challenging, but it's more of a general question about the powers of the president and is not particularly intricate. It does not necessitate a deep or complex understanding of the subject matter. Therefore, while it achieves the task's requirement of posing a question for the answer \"presidential pardons\", it doesn't quite meet the standards for a score of 5. It does not require \"highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations\", which are criteria for the top score according to the rubric. A more advanced question could have included more specific and challenging aspects, such as the conditions under which a pardon can be granted, or the implications of such a pardon on the justice system and society as a whole. So the overall score is 4. [RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What is the process by which a solid changes directly into a gas without going through the liquid phase?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"sublimation\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"sublimation\". The question should not contain the text \"sublimation\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the process by which a solid changes directly into a gas without going through the liquid phase?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question asks for a process where a solid turns into a gas without a liquid phase. This description closely matches the concept of sublimation, a process where a substance transitions directly from a solid to a gas. Hence, the answer provided directly addresses the question, satisfying the requirements of the instruction. The question's level of difficulty is moderate, requiring some understanding of concepts like phase transitions, which involves intermediate level thinking. The question does not include the explicit word \"sublimation,\" making it a suitable question based on the rubric's criteria. However, the quality of the question could have been improved by making it more engaging or introducing a small element of difficulty. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What dystopian novel by George Orwell, published in 1949, depicts a totalitarian future society where the government exercises total surveillance and control over its citizens?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Nineteen Eighty-Four\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Nineteen Eighty-Four\". The question should not contain the text \"Nineteen Eighty-Four\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat dystopian novel by George Orwell, published in 1949, depicts a totalitarian future society where the government exercises total surveillance and control over its citizens?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provided here requires an advanced understanding of not only the specific question asked but also the ability to accurately recall the unique aspects of George Orwell's \"Nineteen Eighty-Four\". It demonstrates a grasp of the plot, themes, and historical context of the novel, as well as the requirement of the question: to answer without using specific text. The task does not provide a straightforward question that would lead directly to the answer \"Nineteen Eighty-Four\". It instead invites detailed knowledge and thoughtful reasoning to deduce the correct answer. This level of complex reasoning, combined with the absence of direct text in the answer, makes the question highly challenging and deserving of the score 5. The question was well-structured to avoid any ambiguity or ease in answering, in line with the score rubric's demands for highly specialized knowledge. The question demands a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter and its implications. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
In which city is Buckingham Palace, the official residence of the British monarch, located?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"London\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"London\". The question should not contain the text \"London\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nIn which city is Buckingham Palace, the official residence of the British monarch, located?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed about the location of Buckingham Palace is an effective formulation. It is a clever twist on the conventional question format, ensuring that the query maintains a level of complexity that aligns with the requirements of the rubric without simply stating the answer. The question doesn't explicitly mention the city of London, but instead refers to the building, thus cleverly aligning with the given instruction's requirement for a question that doesn't contain the explicit mention of \"London.\" By doing so, the question engages the recipient in a task that requires recognizing the significance of the building named Buckingham Palace and relating it to the city of London, indirectly prompting them to recall or identify the correct city by understanding the importance of the residence. This thoughtful formulation indeed makes the question challenging, yet understandable and within the grasp of the average person, making it a fitting response that meets the challenge of the scoring rubric and task description. The challenge of the question aligns with a score of 3 in the rubric, as it incorporates an understanding of the significance of Buckingham Palace relative to its location in London. However, the question could be even more engaging if it required prior knowledge about the palace's current status, such as who currently occupies the residence. This inclusion would elevate the question's complexity and ensure that only individuals with a more detailed knowledge about the British monarchy would be able to answer it successfully. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the title of the first published book in "The Chronicles of Narnia" series by C.S. Lewis?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe\". The question should not contain the text \"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the first published book in \"The Chronicles of Narnia\" series by C.S. Lewis?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response inaccurately asks about the title of the first published book in \"The Chronicles of Narnia\" series by C.S. Lewis. However, the desired question format was followed. The instruction specifically instructed to generate a one-sentence question with the answer \"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe\" without containing the text itself. This requirement was not met in the provided question as it explicitly asks for the title of a book by C.S. Lewis, and as per the given answer, the given question does not have the title \"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe\" as the possible answer. There is also no direct link to the book \"The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe\" in the question, which leads to confusion due to its context in the series. Therefore, the response does not meet the given instruction and cannot be evaluated as per the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What property of a material is measured by its resistance to scratching or abrasion?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"hardness\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"hardness\". The question should not contain the text \"hardness\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat property of a material is measured by its resistance to scratching or abrasion?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided in the response exhibits a moderate level of difficulty. The task of crafting a question that has a unique answer \"hardness\" is not overly challenging. However, the actual knowledge required to deduce that \"hardness\" is the property being questioned could be viewed as more complex than a simple question. This complexity is due to the inclusion of terms such as \"resistance to scratching or abrasion\", which can require a deeper understanding of properties associated with materials. So, the question, despite avoiding the explicit mention of \"hardness\", still requires some degree of understanding to answer accurately. The question could potentially engage a variety of knowledge levels, from basic to some intermediate grasp of material properties. Given that the response demonstrates a clear understanding of the task and provides a suitable, yet challenging, question, it falls into the score 3 category. Thus, taking into account the challenge level based on the rubric and the requirement for an intermediate understanding, the response is given a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What was the ideology that led to the persecution of many individuals during the Red Scare in the United States in the 1950s?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"being a communist\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"being a communist\". The question should not contain the text \"being a communist\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat was the ideology that led to the persecution of many individuals during the Red Scare in the United States in the 1950s?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This response provided a complex question that required an understanding of the historical context, specifically the Red Scare in the United States during the 1950s. The question successfully avoided using the exact phrase \"being a communist\" but still alluded to the concept of communism as a cause for the persecution. It did not simply ask for \"being a communist\" as the answer, which is the requirement of the instruction and hence, it does not comply with the criteria. This question, while thought-provoking and historically meaningful, does not fulfill the requirement per the given instruction. Therefore, this question falls into the category of a 'Very Hard' question. The complexity and specificity of this question demand highly specialized knowledge and multi-step problem-solving, which is consistent with the score rubric's criteria for a score of 5. However, in this case, the response did not satisfy the core requirement set out in the instruction. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Who sculpted the statue of David that is now housed in the Galleria dell'Accademia in Florence, Italy?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Michelangelo\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Michelangelo\". The question should not contain the text \"Michelangelo\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho sculpted the statue of David that is now housed in the Galleria dell'Accademia in Florence, Italy?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question, while seemingly straightforward, actually requires some specialized knowledge to infer the correct answer. The question is about the sculptor of a famous statue and the additional details about the location and name of the statue aid in correctly identifying Michelangelo. It is not immediately clear that Michelangelo is the artist, which makes the question slightly more challenging than one might initially suppose. The question is not very hard, but it's not quite as easy as it might seem, requiring the user to make the correct associations between the information provided. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which country's postal abbreviation is also a pronoun meaning "we" or "ours"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"US\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"US\". The question should not contain the text \"US\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country's postal abbreviation is also a pronoun meaning \"we\" or \"ours\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is extremely challenging as it requires a highly specialized knowledge in both language and culture. It plays on the fact that the abbreviation \"US\" is known to stand for the United States, but it is crafted in a way that it invites the reader to think about it in the context of pronouns, which might not be immediately apparent without prior knowledge or context. The formulation of the question in a way that avoids the explicit mention of the country \"US\" also adds to the complexity of the question, pushing the thought process to infer the answer based on cultural nuances rather than just recalling the information. This high level of abstraction and context-dependent reasoning is why the question is deemed to be very hard. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What set of biblical laws is divided into two tablets, one addressing the relationship between God and humans, and the other addressing the relationships between humans?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Ten Commandments\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Ten Commandments\". The question should not contain the text \"Ten Commandments\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat set of biblical laws is divided into two tablets, one addressing the relationship between God and humans, and the other addressing the relationships between humans?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the instruction and the score rubric, the response is a question which does not refer to the text \"Ten Commandments\" and which is not easily solvable. The question requires a fair amount of knowledge about biblical laws, which are divided into two tablets. Although the question requires understanding of more complex concepts, it doesn't require extensive calculations or highly specialized knowledge. Therefore, the question is moderately challenging, aligning with a score of 3, as it involves a deeper level of understanding that some might find challenging, but it is not overly complex or require extensive problem-solving. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What are the horizontal or vertical marks that make up the structure of a piece of written or printed text?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"lines\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"lines\". The question should not contain the text \"lines\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat are the horizontal or vertical marks that make up the structure of a piece of written or printed text?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented here is relatively easy as it directly relates to the concept of \"lines\" in written or printed text. It employs basic vocabulary and sentence structure, without requiring complex reasoning or specialized knowledge. The question is straightforward and relies on the common understanding of basic elements of text. It is an intermediate question that can be answered by someone with a basic grasp of written or printed language. However, it falls short of the \"Very Easy\" level as it doesn't explicitly ask for a definition of \"lines\" in written or printed text, but it still does not involve extensive calculations or highly specialized knowledge. Therefore, the response is more suited to the \"Easy\" or \"Moderate\" categories of the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which country, famous for its grand palaces and opera houses, is home to the capital city where Mozart was born?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Austria\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Austria\". The question should not contain the text \"Austria\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country, famous for its grand palaces and opera houses, is home to the capital city where Mozart was born?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question asks for a country known for its palaces and opera houses, and hints at the birthplace of Wolfgang Mozart, which is a rather well-known detail. While the question doesn't explicitly state \"Austria,\" the information provided indirectly points to the country in question. The question is challenging due to its indirect nature and relies on the reader's ability to deduce the answer from the given hints. It is not overly difficult, but it does require an advanced level of understanding of global history, which is why it falls into the category of 'Hard' on the score rubric. The question makes the answer more difficult to pinpoint, which adds to its difficulty. Therefore, the question is reasonably challenging, but not at the highest level. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who wrote the novel "Tender Is the Night", which is often considered a companion piece to "The Great Gatsby"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"F. Scott Fitzgerald\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"F. Scott Fitzgerald\". The question should not contain the text \"F. Scott Fitzgerald\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho wrote the novel \"Tender Is the Night\", which is often considered a companion piece to \"The Great Gatsby\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provides a challenging question due to the requirement that the question cannot contain the text \"F. Scott Fitzgerald\". The question requires the reader to correctly deduce that the author of \"Tender Is the Night\" is indeed Fitzgerald without stating his name. This question aligns with an intermediate level of challenge as it requires some prior knowledge of Fitzgerald’s works and an understanding of his authorial style. The question could be simplified by adding the name of the author, but this would not meet the given instructions. Thus, the question, while not highly specialized, is challenging enough to warrant a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the Greek god of the sea and earthquakes, and is often depicted carrying a trident?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Poseidon\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Poseidon\". The question should not contain the text \"Poseidon\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Greek god of the sea and earthquakes, and is often depicted carrying a trident?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response is a clear example of a question that adheres to the instruction while also fulfilling the requirements of the score rubric. This question does not explicitly state the name \"Poseidon,\" and it is formulated in a way that would not be immediately obvious to the respondent as being for \"Poseidon\" alone. However, by cleverly wording the question around the general attributes and characteristics of the Greek god of the sea, it leaves only one possible answer that aligns with the specified attributes, which is indeed \"Poseidon.\" This indirect approach makes the question both engaging and intellectually stimulating, inviting a response that incorporates a broader understanding of Greek mythology. It shows a skillful application of the instructions without compromising the complexity of the question. As per the score rubric, this response is of the appropriate difficulty, as it demands an understanding of more complex concepts beyond the question’s core attribute. So the overall score is 5. [RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What was the name of the Soviet space exploration program that launched the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, into Earth's orbit in 1957?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Sputnik program\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Sputnik program\". The question should not contain the text \"Sputnik program\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat was the name of the Soviet space exploration program that launched the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1, into Earth's orbit in 1957?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provides an easy question that requires basic knowledge of historical events. The use of key specifics such as \"Soviet space exploration program,\" \"Sputnik,\" \"first artificial satellite,\" and \"1957\" makes the answer obvious. Nevertheless, the question has a certain degree of challenge, as it requires remembering the program's launch date, the type of satellite, and the nationality of the program. The question does not explicitly state \"Sputnik program,\" but the correct answer implies this detail. So the overall score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.