id
string | message_id
string | from
list | to
list | date
string | subject
string | content
string | email_context
string | attachments
string | hypothetical_query_list
list | token_count_content
int32 | token_count_context
int32 | user
string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.
|
d56f37f5-80a6-4c0d-b8ea-9f36090dc5b5
|
[
"tom.donohoe@enron.com"
] |
[
"kelley_doolan@mcgraw-hill.com"
] |
Mon, 31 Jul 2000 07:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
|
Re: Inside FERC's price file Attachment is free from Viruses.
ScanMail
|
Here are the First of Month Prices.
Tom Donohoe
713-853-7151
|
tdonoho.nsf
|
[] | 22 | 0 |
donohoe-t
|
|
6.
|
1ad8ef54-ea86-42f8-b0a6-87976ef88793
|
[
"tom.donohoe@enron.com"
] |
[
"stephanie.severs@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:51:00 -0700 (PDT)
|
Joe parks and I need 2 new desks set up in EOL so that the proper
accountability is made for the products as they trade.
Joe Parks new ID id ENA-IM Cent Gulf NGPL.
My ID is ENA - IM Central Gulf.
Please Expidite this as it is keeping us from trading our products online.
|
tdonoho.nsf
|
[] | 76 | 0 |
donohoe-t
|
||
9.
|
b56c7683-e034-4cd9-b73a-99aa66d871de
|
[
"tom.donohoe@enron.com"
] |
[
"thonings@cilco.com"
] |
Wed, 26 Apr 2000 06:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
|
Re: May Bid Request
|
The following are Enron's offers for May 200 supplies
Trunkline ELA base 3000 $3.065
Panhandle Field Base 10,000 Index less .0075
NGPL Midcontinent base 11,000 Index less .0075
NICOR City Gate Base 3,000 Index +0.
Please call Tom Donohoe at 713-853-7151.
|
tdonoho.nsf
|
[] | 90 | 0 |
donohoe-t
|
|
1.
|
4b3e9cc4-8571-4e84-bb38-1ca979ca3261
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:43:57 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: E-Tag 1.7 Testing - OATI
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: sccobb@srpnet.com [mailto:sccobb@srpnet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:31 PM
To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
Subject: E-Tag 1.7 Testing - OATI
ISAS Members and Interested Parties,
OATI is currently not prepared to accommodate open ended testing during the
WSCC test period of now through Tuesday, February 12, 2002. However, they
have graciously agreed to provide us with two, four hour test periods as
follows:
Thursday, February 7, 2002, 0800-1200PPT
Monday, February 11, 2002, 0800-1200PPT
Please make best efforts to kick the tires on E-Tag 1.7 during these time
frames. We have attached another copy of the WSCC testing guidelines.
Thanks and Good Luck!
<<E-Tag Functionality Test V_1.pdf>> <<E-tag Functionality Test
Report.doc>>
|
[] | 4 | 232 |
scholtes-d
|
|
100.
|
41480a55-fb22-4583-bbcb-2194deb724c6
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"josie.jarnagin@enron.com"
] |
Mon, 5 Nov 2001 15:54:47 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Reminder-Flu Shots-Please respond by 11/6/01 if you have not
yet signed up and would like to participate
|
please sign me up for myself and spouse.
Thank you
Diana Scholtes
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Jarnagin, Josie
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:16 AM
To: DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject: Reminder-Flu Shots-Please respond by 11/6/01 if you have not yet signed up and would like to participate
Flu Shot Clinic Sponsored By Enron
When: Tuesday, November 13, 2001
Time: 8:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m.
Where: Enron 3WTC Office
Who: Enron employees, spouses and domestic partners are welcome to participate
Please sign up, via email to Josie Jarnagin, by Tuesday, November 6, 2001.
The following is a list of employees already signed up for the clinic.
Last Name First Name Quantity
Alport Kysa 1
Axford Kathy 1
Belden Tim 2
Bruce James 1
Calger Chris 1
Clark Ed 2
Cutsforth Diane 1
Davidson Debra 1
Driscoll Michael 1
Elafandi Mo 1
Eriksson Fredrik 1
Fuller Dave 1
Gilbert Jim 2
Gustafson Mollie 1
Hall Steve 1
Hall Erin 1
Malowney John 1
Mays Wayne 1
Meyer Jim 1
Miles Darryl 2
Mumm Chris 1
Nalluri Susmitha 2
Nelson Kourtney 1
Oh John 1
Rance Susan 2
Rasmussen Dale 1
Semperger Cara 2
Sheppard Kathryn 1
Shields Jeff 2
Slaughter Jeff 2
Soderquist Larry 1
Van Gelder Jon 2
Villeggiante Theresa 1
Wente Laura 1
Williams Bill 1
Williams III Bill 1
Yoder Christian 2
|
[] | 24 | 548 |
scholtes-d
|
|
101.
|
5ec7c7b8-9db5-4d12-8a15-a88c6759f16c
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Mon, 5 Nov 2001 13:30:38 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Midc long 11-4
|
Either Sean or I will be forwarding the e-mails to real-time for now on.
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Williams III, Bill
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 8:11 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: FW: Midc long 11-4
Importance: High
Diana,
Here is the message that Kate sent to Diane, and the original messages from Diane are below that. I think we will have this sorted out going forward.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: Symes, Kate
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 5:00 PM
To: Cutsforth, Diane
Cc: Semperger, Cara
Subject: FW: Midc long 11-4
Importance: High
Diane -
I'd like to clarify the type of information Real Time needs in order to fulfill positions for the short term desks. As we're all sadly aware, PGE has become increasingly frustrated with our confusion regarding delivery points when we do lending and parking deals with them, so it is imperative that any information included in an e-mail to Real Time corroborates with data entered into Enpower. Following are the discrepancies I see between Enpower and the information given to Real Time:
1. On Sunday, according to Enpower, STNW is long on peak @ PGE System. The deal number that would be relevant to Real Time in this case would be the purchase (855033, not 855032). That way we can link our real time sales to the day-ahead purchase in Deal Scheduling. Also, Diana confirmed that this length should be sold off @ Mid-Columbia, not PGE System, which is not what is shown in Enpower.
2. On Monday, according to Enpower, STNW is short 53 mw on peak @ Mid-Columbia. The relevant deal number here would be 855044 - again, we only need to know the deal number that corresponds with your position. Also, since anything that alludes to the wrong hours, delivery point, or deal number only serves to confuse the traders on shift, I was thinking it might work better if we sat down and went over these positions together before sending anything out to the group. (This is what I do with Holden when STSW does lending or parking deals.)
Please let me know if you have any questions about this, or any suggestions about how to make this work more smoothly.
Thanks,
Kate
-----Original Message-----
From: Cutsforth, Diane
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:24 PM
To: DL-Portland Real Time Shift; Alport, Kysa
Subject: FW: Midc long 11-4
Importance: High
Forgot the light load on Monday and deal numbers -
The deal number is 855032.1 for Sunday the 4th 7-22 Heavy Load Hours only.
The deal numbers for the 53 MWH on light load for Monday is 854942.1/855044.1 - please supply at PGE System.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cutsforth, Diane
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 1:17 PM
To: DL-Portland Real Time Shift; Alport, Kysa
Subject: Midc long 11-4
Importance: High
For November 4th, Midc HL hours 7-22 only, we are 50 long, please supply at PGE system.
Diane Cutsforth
Enron North America
Power Pre-Scheduling
503-464-3831 desk
|
[] | 28 | 794 |
scholtes-d
|
|
102.
|
9f536c73-3a74-4b4d-a642-52948ed27b59
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"premierpumpcompany@home.com"
] |
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 17:40:57 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: FBI information regarding possible terrorist threat on West
Coast
|
FYI
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Belden, Tim
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 10:12 AM
To: DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject: FW: FBI information regarding possible terrorist threat on West Coast
This just came to me today. This information is widely available to corporations and law enforcement around the country. It will likely hit the media in the next day or so. This is all the information that is available.
Enron Corp. Business Controls/Corporate Security received the following information via the National Threat Warning system. While we do not wish to unduly alarm employees, the specificity of the information dictated immediate dissemination to our West Coast offices.
THE FBI IS IN POSSESSION OF UNCORROBORATED INFORMATION INDICATING THE
POSSIBILITY OF ADDITIONAL TERRORIST ATTACKS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES,
SPECIFICALLY THE WEST COAST. REPORTEDLY, UNSPECIFIED GROUPS ARE
TARGETING SUSPENSION BRIDGES ON THE WEST COAST. SIX INCIDENTS ARE TO
TAKE PLACE DURING RUSH HOUR BEGINNING FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 2 AND CONTINUING
THROUGH NOVEMBER 7, 2001.
NO FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THIS ALLEGED ATTACK IS KNOWN AT THIS TIME.
THE FBI IS ATTEMPTING TO VERIFY THE VALIDITY OF THIS REPORT. RECIPIENTS
WILL BE UPDATED AS EVENTS WARRANT.
RECIPIENTS WHO RECEIVE OR DEVELOP INFORMATION RELATED TO THIS MATTER
SHOULD IMMEDIATELY CONTACT THEIR LOCAL FBI OFFICE.
We will keep you apprised if we receive any further information.
Thank you.
|
[] | 7 | 393 |
scholtes-d
|
|
103.
|
6ec5678e-1fa9-4272-b165-8b31d16d4464
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"bill_casey@pgn.com"
] |
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:46:09 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Happy Halloween 8)~
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Runswick, Stacy
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:42 AM
To: Semperger, Cara; Scholtes, Diana; Salisbury, Holden; Fischer, Mark;
Alonso, Tom
Subject: FW: Happy Halloween 8)~
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Sallee [mailto:scott.sallee@tlcd.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Jaime Dyer; julez1974@aol.com; Katie; Mark Mitchell; Leslie Rogers;
Runswick, Stacy; Bill Sallee; Carol Sallee; Carie Wineger
Subject: FWD:Happy Halloween 8)~
-------------------------------------------------------------
On 10/31/01, Monique Lazzaro wrote:
Top 10 reasons why trick or treating is better than sex..... 8 )~
10. You're guaranteed to get at least a little something in the sack.
9. If you get tired, you can wait ten minutes and go at it again.
8. The uglier you look, the easier it is to get some.
7. You don't have to compliment the person who gave you candy.
6. It's okay when the person you're with fantasizes you're someone else,
because you ARE someone else.
5. 40 years from now you will still enjoy candy.
4. If you don't get what you want, you can always go next door.
3. It doesn't matter if the kids hear you moaning and groaning.
2. Less guilt the next morning.
.....AND the #1 reason,
1. You can do the whole neighborhood!!
Happy Halloween ! Be safe!
|
[] | 4 | 383 |
scholtes-d
|
|
104.
|
89647241-0e7c-4cb9-ad65-540cce64f584
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"sean.crandall@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 19:01:05 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Recruiting and Floor Buildout
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: =09Belden, Tim =20
Sent:=09Tuesday, October 30, 2001 2:48 PM
To:=09DL-Portland World Trade Center
Cc:=09Lavorato, John; Kitchen, Louise
Subject:=09Recruiting and Floor Buildout
During the past few days several people have approached us wondering why we=
are continuing to do college recruiting and continuing with the floor buil=
d out given the state of the company today. We appreciate people's concern=
s about adding people and spending money at a time when we ought to be redu=
cing unnecessary expenses. Let us begin by saying that we share these conc=
erns and are not hiring people or undertaking significant capital expenditu=
res without a great deal of thought. We would also encourage people to tal=
k to their manager or either of us if you don't understand why we are doing=
certain things. In short, we have decided to continue with the college re=
cruiting, although we have not yet decided how many, if any, we will hire. =
We have decided to delay the beginning of the floor build out for a couple=
of weeks.
Why Are We Continuing With College Recruiting?
During the last few years we have made tremendous progress establishing a p=
resence for Enron broadly and the Portland office specifically with leading=
schools in the northwest. This past year we finally reached critical mass=
and had tremendous success in our recruiting efforts. Although we are unc=
ertain about our hiring needs this year, we feel that it is in our best lon=
g term interest to continue having a presence with the schools in the north=
west. We have already made presentations and done initial screenings at mo=
st schools. We have identified the best people from each school and have a=
lready made plans for them to come to our office for two super Saturdays. =
The cost to us to finish this process is not large compared to the benefit =
that we gain from honoring our commitment to the schools and students as pa=
rticipants in their on-campus recruiting programs. We also realize that it=
is a hard year to be coming out of school looking for a job. It is our be=
lief that students would rather interview with us even if the possibilities=
of employment may be somewhat diminished. Finally, we would like to empha=
size the point that we have not yet committed to hiring anybody. We will i=
nterview people, identify the best candidates, and make hiring decisions ba=
sed on the needs of the office. Before extending offers we will consider t=
he potential impact that it could have on people in this office and Enron e=
mployees in other offices who have been redeployed. Stated another way, we=
don't intend to hire a bunch of new people if there are people within Enro=
n who could fill positions or if it would put the jobs of the people alread=
y here at risk. We may end up postponing hiring decisions until we are mor=
e certain about the state of affairs in the company.
How Will the Floor Move Play Out?
We have decided to postpone the floor build out for a few weeks. While we =
still think that it makes sense for the office, we have decided to pause fo=
r a couple of weeks before we start to spend significant amounts of money o=
n this. When talking to the build out team today it became clear that dela=
ying would accomplish several goals. First, it allows us to get final arch=
itectural plans in place and firm quotes from contractors so that we can mo=
re precisely peg down the costs before moving forward. Second, it gives th=
e build out team breathing room to iron out more of the details of the move=
. Finally, it buys us a little more time to decide whether or not it makes=
sense to do this project given the state of affairs of the company right n=
ow. While we still think that we are going to move forward with this proje=
ct, it seems like buying a couple of weeks of time is the right thing to do=
right now. In about two weeks we will reconvene with the build out team w=
ith firm budget numbers and make a decision to either move ahead, cancel, o=
r delay again. =20
As always, we will try to keep people updated on things as soon as new, rel=
iable information becomes available. We recognize that this is a very hard=
time for everyone. Please try to stay focused on the job at hand and keep=
up the success of this office.
Tim Belden and Chris Calger
|
[] | 4 | 1,047 |
scholtes-d
|
|
105.
|
58c9bd70-97a1-413f-8129-53f3cc9366f2
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"stewart.rosman@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 17:33:24 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Nov. visit
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Frazier, Doug [mailto:Douglas@chelanpud.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 11:14 AM
To: Diana Scholtes (E-mail)
Subject: Nov. visit
Hi, Here is my schedule to be home in Nov.
11/5 - 11/9 and 11/26 - 11/30.
The rest of the time I'll be gone somewhere. If your schedule says to come some other time during the month, I'll make sure there will be someone here.
Let me know what your plans are.
|
[] | 4 | 135 |
scholtes-d
|
|
106.
|
c0d0c604-8735-4284-b1cd-78b9b844a4fe
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"monica.lande@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 13:21:38 -0800 (PST)
|
Hey Monica!
Long time no hear! Just wanted to make sure you and Kristian are doing fine. Morale here is extremely low. I'm sure its the same there. But we continue to be busy. Good thing for all of us! When are you guys coming back to the states? By the way, how are your parents? I hope they are safe and well. Keep in touch!
Diana
|
[] | 96 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
|||
107.
|
6d0a1683-2e8f-4881-b299-587f43d42e78
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"michael.tully@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 13:18:20 -0800 (PST)
|
RE:
|
thanks
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Tully, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:50 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: RE:
Spoke to Houston, and they know that it is not working. It is a problem with the database. The Database Administrators are working on it as we speak. As soon as it is done, they will call me.
Michael S. Tully
Trade Floor Support, Portland
(503)464-7790 Desk
(503)807-7862 Cell
michael.tully@enron.com
He who runs behind car, often get exhausted.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 8:28 AM
To: Tully, Michael
Subject:
Hey just wanted you to know that the Real-Time position Mgr. is still not working; or updating.
ds
|
[] | 6 | 215 |
scholtes-d
|
|
108.
|
beb1d4e9-3e48-4f1a-b24c-6388b7625440
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"michael.tully@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:27:56 -0800 (PST)
|
Hey just wanted you to know that the Real-Time position Mgr. is still not working; or updating.
ds
|
[] | 28 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
|||
109.
|
54b4d3e3-9360-48a1-bda1-83f6fb595b53
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"jmstebbins@duke-energy.com"
] |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:53:16 -0800 (PST)
|
FW:
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: William Scholtes [mailto:premierpumpcompany@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 11:33 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject:
From the desk of
Bill Scholtes
Premier Pump Company
|
[] | 4 | 63 |
scholtes-d
|
|
11.
|
755068cc-66cc-4257-8bf0-5e411e0d86b2
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"virginia.thompson@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 12:12:51 -0800 (PST)
|
PGE Settlements
|
Virginia,
Not sure who handles the PGE account, but I have completed the settlements for the year 2001. I am still working on Dec 2000 issues and should have those complete this week. Can you please forward this to the appropriate people in Houston.
Thanks,
Diana Scholtes
|
[] | 65 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
110.
|
69d09a90-ccd6-47d1-89a5-784b68a798e9
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:37:19 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: tsin
|
FYI
Here's our password for the TSIN registry. Dave, I figured someone in IT would need to have this password incase Cara and I aren't around!
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Will, Lloyd
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 5:20 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: tsin
login and password for EPMI is
jzurita
redfish
Note EPMI has two desks EPMIEA and EPMIWE
If you dont mind just email me the changes you have made.
Thanks.
|
[] | 49 | 95 |
scholtes-d
|
|
111.
|
b2edfe99-a2de-4f2e-90aa-8c3096a9c4b0
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"julie.kearney@enron.com"
] |
Mon, 29 Oct 2001 18:39:46 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Portland State
|
julie,
this is first of the month week for us and busy! if there is no one else, let me know and we can try to re-arrange our coverage.
Thanks,
diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Kearney, Julie
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 1:59 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Portland State
Importance: High
Diana,
Would you be available to help me with the Assoc / Analyst recruiting this week? We are going to Portland State this week.
Here's how it works: There is an Info Session on Thursday at 5:00 PM and interviews on Friday. The Info Session is from 5:00 PM --> 6:30. There is a PowerPoint presentation which explains Enron's business which depending upon how many questions, usually takes from an hour to an hour and a half.
Then, Friday morning, we are only interviewing in the morning from 8:00 AM to 12:00 Noon. The interviews are 1/2 hour each. You should be back to the office before Noon.
Would your schedule allow you to help me out?
Julie K
x7404
|
[] | 54 | 224 |
scholtes-d
|
|
113.
|
a2666546-9c29-444a-949b-14124d4a8397
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"john.malowney@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 15:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
|
Smurfit
|
Wonder what their nomination will be for Nov?
Thanks
Diana
|
[] | 15 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
114.
|
26d56a81-2e47-41ae-acbd-1554f854657a
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"laird.dyer@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
|
RE: Re-Assignment of Transmission from the City of Shasta Lake
|
O.K.! Just to keep you appraised of what I'm doing, I have left a message with Bob Sullivan @ CISO and I spoke to WAPA. I think the call to WAPA was just to notify them that they won't be managing Shasta's transmission position for the term of our deal. I'm going to be working with Bob Sullivan to create procedures for scheduling purposes. Not sure if you want to stay in the loop for that? You can update Gerry though, for me. I appreciate your help!
Thanks
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Dyer, Laird
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: RE: Re-Assignment of Transmission from the City of Shasta Lake
Diana,
Great work. Is there anything you need me to do?
If everything is in place, I will contact Gerry Cupp at Shasta letting him know. Or, if he needs to do something, I will get that started.
Thanks,
Laird
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 10:19 AM
To: 'vrl1@pge.com'
Cc: Rosman, Stewart; Dyer, Laird; Buerkle, Jim; Crandall, Sean
Subject: Re-Assignment of Transmission from the City of Shasta Lake
Vicky,
Thank you again for you assistance with this process. As you requested, this is our notification to PG&E of our purchase from the City of Shasta Lake of their COTP Transmission Capacity bi-directionally. The term of the deal will include the months of November and December 2001. Also as you requested, I faxed the Confirmation Notice between Shasta and EPMI to your office. I have listed my office number below if you have any further questions.
Thanks again,
Diana Scholtes
Enron West Trading
503-464-3807
diana.scholtes@enron.com
|
[] | 129 | 351 |
scholtes-d
|
|
115.
|
bd453554-f76c-43ff-b723-5e38bd270177
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"vrl1@pge.com"
] |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
|
Re-Assignment of Transmission from the City of Shasta Lake
|
Vicky,
Thank you again for you assistance with this process. As you requested, this is our notification to PG&E of our purchase from the City of Shasta Lake of their COTP Transmission Capacity bi-directionally. The term of the deal will include the months of November and December 2001. Also as you requested, I faxed the Confirmation Notice between Shasta and EPMI to your office. I have listed my office number below if you have any further questions.
Thanks again,
Diana Scholtes
Enron West Trading
503-464-3807
|
diana.scholtes@enron.com
|
[] | 130 | 11 |
scholtes-d
|
|
116.
|
d34e06e7-ce14-4b74-99bf-4fbf578e487b
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"lynn.costantini@nerc.net"
] |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:57:40 -0700 (PDT)
|
RE: Registration for New E-tag 1.7 data
|
Lynn,
Who can I talk to regarding my password to get into the TSIN site?
Diana Scholtes
Enron
503-464-3807
|
diana.scholtes@enron.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Lynn Costantini [mailto:Lynn.Costantini@nerc.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:41 PM
To: info@tsin.com
Subject: Registration for New E-tag 1.7 data
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Registration of new data elements as required by E-tag 1.7 can
commence immediately. Please go to http://reg.tsin.com, click
Registrant's Area, and log onto your account for more information.
Documents pertaining to electronic tagging, including
"Electronic Tagging: Functional Specification, Version 1.7" and "What's
New in E-tag 1.7" are available from
http://www.nerc.com/~filez/tag/E-tag/E-Tag.htm.
Please email info@tsin.com if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Lynn P. Costantini
Robert W. Cummings
NERC
609-452-8060
|
[] | 42 | 250 |
scholtes-d
|
|
117.
|
b57c1cc5-4954-4703-8ec6-ed4ad33b17e1
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"donald.robinson@enron.com",
"cara.semperger@enron.com",
"diane.cutsforth@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:52:19 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: TBL Transmission: Improper rejection of tags
|
FYI
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 11:27 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Crandall, Sean
Subject: TBL Transmission: Improper rejection of tags
Diana,
As a follow-up to our discussions earlier this week, Sally Long (Al Paschke's assistant) called me this morning to inform me that
1. TBL "inappropriately denied our tag last week."
2. She has "educated a few people" so this won't happen again.
Let me know if you have any further problems.
Steve
|
[] | 8 | 150 |
scholtes-d
|
|
118.
|
9c88754c-14cd-46d5-8e35-8e75e6d3a796
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"paul.kane@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 25 Oct 2001 11:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
|
RE: Monitor Sale
|
Paul,
Put me down for a 21" and a 19" if there's availability.
diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Kane, Paul
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 8:32 AM
To: DL-Portland World Trade Center
Subject: Monitor Sale
All,
We will be offering monitors for sale again in the Portland Office. We have a variety of monitors for you to choose from.
Older 17' units - $10
Newer Compaq 17' units - $20
Older 21' units - $25
Newer Compaq 19' units - $35
Please respond to this email with the type of monitor you would like to purchase. Will have a lottery type drawing on Friday Morning. By Friday afternoon, you will be notified that you can come by and pick out your monitor. We need to have all monitors picked up and removed my Friday the 2nd. After that, all remaining monitors will be donated to charity.
Regards,
Paul Kane
Portland IT
|
[] | 31 | 201 |
scholtes-d
|
|
119.
|
d2f34a46-ee57-434d-a884-0da8db252d22
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"premierpumpcompany@home.com"
] |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: All Domestic Employees who Participate in the Enron Corp
Savings Plan
|
not that we have much equity in our 401 anymore, but we may need to look at which fund to invest in.
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON On Behalf Of Corporate Benefits@ENRON
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:28 PM
To: All Enron Employees United States Group@ENRON
Subject: To: All Domestic Employees who Participate in the Enron Corp Savings Plan
October 26 is fast approaching!
Mark your calendar--
as the Enron Corp. Savings Plan moves to a new administrator!
As a Savings Plan Participant, Friday, October 26 at 3:00pm CST will be your last day to:
? Transfer Investment Fund Balances and make Contribution Allocation Changes
? Change your Contribution Rate for the November 15th payroll deductions
? Enroll if you were hired before October 1
TWO important reminders:
? Vanguard Lifestrategy investment options are being replaced with Fidelity Freedom funds and;
? Your funds will remain invested in the funds chosen as of 3:00pm CST until 8:00 am November 20.
At 8:00 am CST, November 20 the Savings Plan system re-opens with great new features.
Should you need assistance during the transition period, call ext. 3-7979 and press Option 6. This option will be available from 8:00am CST October 29 until 5:00pm CST November 19.
Enron Benefits... keeping pace with your lifestyle.
|
[] | 32 | 323 |
scholtes-d
|
|
12.
|
7f5876f3-53e0-4ea1-970a-e9a9c8e03b77
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:03:48 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: E-Tag 1.7 Test Procedure
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: sccobb@srpnet.com [mailto:sccobb@srpnet.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:09 PM
To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
Subject: E-Tag 1.7 Test Procedure
ISAS Members,
Attached is a draft test procedure for E-Tag 1.7. It was created and
approved by a small "swat team" of ISAS members and WSCC Staff. Please
review this draft procedure and provide any comments you may have by 1200
MST Tuesday, January 29, 2002.
Thanks.
<<E-Tag Functionality Test Ver 1_1-25-02.doc>>
|
[] | 4 | 161 |
scholtes-d
|
|
120.
|
4bd1bcaa-3057-4d58-acc5-2b4e903ab3d1
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"fran.chang@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 15:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
|
RE: NCPA buy/resale deal
|
I went into Scheduling to view these deals and they have been zeroed out. I'm confused as to why they would appear in the view actuals in deal entry. I believe these should synchronize, or they read off of one another. ??
diana
Deal # 517673.1 and 517674.1
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 11:39 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean
Subject: FW: NCPA buy/resale deal
HI Diana and Sean:
Would you advise whether I can ask scheduling to zero out volumes for NCPA buy/resale deals for 10/1/01-10/3/01 in "View Actual" tab in deal entry?
Thanks,
Fran
-----Original Message-----
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:14 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean
Subject: NCPA buy/resale deal
Importance: High
Hi Diana and Sean:
I believe we didn't buy/resell with NCPA for 10/1/01-10/3/01. Although we are good in scheduling (no activities scheduled) there are some volumes showing up in deal entry side ("view actuals" tab). In order to make sure that at month end settlement processes will be smooth for these NCPA buy/resale deals, I would like to ask the scheduling group to zero out those volumes for 10/1/01-10/3/01 in view actuals in deal entry, but I need you to give me the green light first. Your confirmation will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Fran
x7973
|
[] | 77 | 325 |
scholtes-d
|
|
121.
|
94256237-2336-4840-9e25-b9bb39f70f71
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"adam.senn@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 13:11:06 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: An Inbound Message For You Has Been Quarantined
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Enron MailSweeper Admin
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 2:38 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: An Inbound Message For You Has Been Quarantined
You have received this message because someone has attempted to send you an e-mail from outside of Enron with an attachment type that Enron does not allow into our messaging environment. Your e-mail has been quarantined and is being held at the MailSweeper server.
Sender: sliebert@dcpud.org
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:36:56 -0700
Subject: November Capacity information
Attachment Type: Scenarios/Incoming/Inbound EXE Catcher: A filename matching the file mask was detected: 'capacity contract template.exe'.
If the intended email is of valid business-related content and you believe it requires Enron resources to retrieve it, you may call your Help Desk and ask to have it released from quarantine and delivered to your e-mail Inbox. Your message will be scanned and checked for viruses prior to requested release. If it contains a virus or there is reason to suspect it is malicious code, it will not be delivered.
North American Resolution Center: 713 853 1411
European Resolution Center: 0044 207 78 36777
EES Help Desk: 888 853 9797
ETS Solution Center: 713 345 4745 (Houston) or 402 398 7454 (Omaha)
Please DO NOT reply to this address as it is not a monitored system mailbox.
|
[] | 4 | 341 |
scholtes-d
|
|
122.
|
b9d5e092-6741-4bf9-bfd4-51361cbd510a
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"kysa.alport@enron.com"
] |
Mon, 22 Oct 2001 12:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: CPM
|
Hey what's the scoop on this?
diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Belden, Tim
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:22 AM
To: Williams III, Bill; Semperger, Cara; Mallory, Chris; Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean; Fischer, Mark; Alonso, Tom; Alport, Kysa; Symes, Kate
Subject: FW: CPM
What is this project? Who is the sponsor in the west?
-----Original Message-----
From: Nat, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Belden, Tim; Will, Lloyd
Subject: CPM
Per our discussion yesterday, these are the people we have identified who will parallel test the consolidated position manager, after an initial limited production release, against results from whatever tools they are using in production today...
EAST WEST
Smith Day Kysa Alport
Corry Bentley Kate Symes
Only the East guys have participated in early testing in our test environment. Generally, it is much easier for everyone to test against production data once the app is migrated. The data in test is pretty ugly. Since CPM is new and does not update anything, we have no problem moving to prod for further testing once the app is stable.
Glad to discuss...
Steve
|
[] | 17 | 302 |
scholtes-d
|
|
123.
|
252ef5b9-04a5-4713-8032-f2639b0269af
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"sean.crandall@enron.com"
] |
Sun, 21 Oct 2001 14:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: Business Practice #11
|
FYI.....
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Frazier, Doug [mailto:Douglas@chelanpud.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 12:54 PM
To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
Subject: RE: Business Practice #11
I have to tell you more than you want to know to preface this response.
There are 5 hydro projects in the Mid-Columbia region. These 5 projects are owned and controlled by 3 control areas - Douglas County PUD, Chelan County PUD and Grant County PUD. Some of the generation from these 5 projects has been sold on a long-term basis to several participants. I'm not familiar with the term "take away rights", but every mwh generated at these 5 projects is either used for load in the 3 control areas or it is moved away to participant's control areas. The fact that some want to represent their share of generation as being part of a "single bus" and claiming it can be moved away without naming a transmission provider does not accurately represent the transfer of energy from one control area to another. Douglas, Chelan and Grant are the only control areas at the Mid-Columbia with other adjacent control areas.
Each participant has transmission capability (either their own or purchased) to transfer their share of generation from one of our control areas to their own. These transmission paths serve one of two purposes. 1) dynamic schedules or fixed schedules to serve load or 2) transfers for sale or resale.
The "single bus" idea at the Mid-C will soon be correctly represented for 4 of the 5 projects. Chelan and Grant plan to combine their control area boundaries (for scheduling and tagging purposes only) and call it the Mid-C HUB. This HUB is registered as a TP with NERC as MHUB and will accomodate transfers of energy BETWEEN participants. All other transactions will require other transmission to move energy OUT OF the Mid-C HUB. Douglas County PUD is not part of the Mid-C HUB or MHUB.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hackney, Mark W(Z39911) [ <mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com>]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 3:04 PM
To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
Subject: Business Practice #11
"For transactions that occur at only one bus (i.e. no OASIS/GF transmission
involved) use a willing TP on the second line with the same PSE as on the
first line and the words "Single Bus" in the OASIS reservation field and
"7-F" as the Product."
Is this practice not being practiced? I've seen/heard that at the MID
Columbia folks selling energy to those who have take away rights at MID C
are have their tags denied because the tag creators are not using a "TP
specific transmission path or designation". It was agreed to use "Single
Bus" in these situations to avoid the implications of transmission service
where no transmission service was necessary from the MID C.
If the sink control area is bringing the energy back to their system at that
point then the sink should have it indicated that it's not a single bus for
their transmission portion, but may be "GF" or "No reservation required"
from the bus to the system. But in this circumstance then the path is not
MIDC-MIDC but MIDC-SYS. That's my take. Others wish to pipe in?
Mark W. Hackney
Section Leader
Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling
APS OATT Administration
Arizona Public Service Company
602.250.1128 - Office
602.908.1423 - Cell
602.250.1155 - Fax
<mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com>
_________________________________________________________________
Click to add my contact info to your organizer:
<http://my.infotriever.com/cc2tf0ey>
|
[] | 8 | 890 |
scholtes-d
|
|
124.
|
8e52d3d9-d870-456a-b381-9ebb8ae44fae
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"stewart.rosman@enron.com"
] |
Sun, 21 Oct 2001 13:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: Credit w/ City of Klamath Falls
|
Stewart,
I left you an envelope with information regarding the City of K. Falls. Not sure if you forwarded it to anyone to begin the process for credit approval. Can you please respond to Ray's E-mail? Let me know if there is something else you need me to do.
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Grinberg, Ray [mailto:Ray.Grinberg@PacifiCorp.com]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Credit w/ City of Klamath Falls
Hey Diana-
What's up with getting credit with the City of Klamath Falls? I didn't hear back from you the other day. It sure would be nice to get that in place. Is there someone there I need to talk to?
thanks,
Ray Grinberg
|
[] | 74 | 126 |
scholtes-d
|
|
125.
|
b158060f-b834-4e2c-9879-ec6438a4e6a5
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"bill_casey@pgn.com"
] |
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 17:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: Why stick people are extinct.
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Hara, Kathy [mailto:KHara@avistaenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 1:52 PM
To: Semperger, Cara; Scholtes, Diana; Demetrios Fotiou (E-mail); Flint Mitchell (E-mail); Jim Ewers (E-mail); Jon Perry (E-mail); Keith Wagner (E-mail); Kevin McMahan (E-mail); Burnett, Lisa; Little Boogie (E-mail); Meg Coleman (E-mail); Patrick Jackson (E-mail); Pete Karagianes (E-mail); Randy Enders (E-mail); Robb Gray (E-mail); Ron Hadwiger (E-mail); Stephanie Gerk (E-mail); Uncle Krusty (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Why stick people are extinct.
-----Original Message-----
From: Chapman, Michelle
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 13:33
To: French, Blaine; Hara, Kathy; Harper, Steve; Holland, Kevin; Stelzer, Chris; Steiner, Nolan; Amy Palmer (E-mail); Carrie Wurzburg (E-mail); Kim Lechtenberg (E-mail); Kris Bauer (E-mail); Melissa Camp (E-mail); Sylvia Super (E-mail); Law, Andy; Shortell, Greg
Cc: 'mchapman@icehouse.net'
Subject: FW: Why stick people are extinct.
Subject: Why stick people are extinct.
|
[] | 4 | 338 |
scholtes-d
|
|
13.
|
54166ea8-03c0-4bfe-baf8-027fcc0ea971
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 13:25:19 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: December 2001
|
We match with $424.80 owing to PGE for the month of December 01
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: December 2001
Hi Diana
Here is our detail for December 2001. There are only real power losses and it's only from 12/4 to 12/7. This should be an easy one to match.
Anne
|
[] | 26 | 91 |
scholtes-d
|
|
130.
|
d981f290-b290-4734-8067-0c5c503dab04
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"christian.yoder@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
|
RE: Transmission with Bonneville
|
Steve Hall is contacting Al Paske regarding the transmission contract. Apparently they have already been discussing this issue.
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Yoder, Christian
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 3:10 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Denton, Rhonda L.
Subject: RE: Transmission with Bonneville
Have you been able to come up with any information about this transmission?----cgy
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Yoder, Christian
Subject: RE: Transmission with Bonneville
I don't. I will pull our contract with BPA and give you a decent reply!
d
-----Original Message-----
From: Yoder, Christian
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 9:32 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Subject: FW: Transmission with Bonneville
Diana,
The message below is a routine notification message from our contracts administrator in Houston. Do you know which agreements she is referrring to and whether or not we need to renew them? ----cgy
-----Original Message-----
From: Denton, Rhonda L.
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 3:02 PM
To: Yoder, Christian
Cc: King, Jan M.
Subject: Transmission with Bonneville
I show that both of the transmission agreements that we had with Bonneville expired 9/31/01. Do we need to execute firm and non-firm service agreements with them? I'm copying Jan b/c I'm not sure you are back in town.
|
[] | 32 | 382 |
scholtes-d
|
|
131.
|
060f621d-db66-4358-b950-d7423f43e5d2
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"kysa.alport@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: Short due to lending at PGE System for Wednesday, 10/17.
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Robinson, Donald
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 11:41 AM
To: DL-Portland Real Time Shift
Cc: Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean
Subject: Short due to lending at PGE System for Wednesday, 10/17.
We are short at PGE system for Wednesday, 10/17/01. HE1-6, 23-24pdt, we are 13mw short (total of 104mw). This is due to a lending deal done by the NW Cash desk. Please supply Portland at their system in the most cost effective manner possible. Deal #821995.1
Thanks,
Donald Robinson, NW preschedule desk
|
[] | 4 | 163 |
scholtes-d
|
|
132.
|
73b48aeb-6838-49e7-9e48-5cacac013de1
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"bill_casey@pgn.com"
] |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 15:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: FW: Forward Warning
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: =09Semperger, Cara =20
Sent:=09Thursday, October 11, 2001 12:55 PM
To:=09Scholtes, Diana
Subject:=09FW: FW: Forward Warning
-----Original Message-----
From: =09Ward, Kim S (Houston) =20
Sent:=09Thursday, October 11, 2001 10:04 AM
To:=09Angie Conner (E-mail); Ann Sutton (E-mail); Brad Fagan (E-mail); Cath=
y Pocock (E-mail); Chris Todd (E-mail); Christopher Smith (E-mail); Cindy T=
arsi (E-mail); Dave Breish (E-mail); David Hutchens (E-mail); David Payne (=
E-mail); Elizabeth Jordan (E-mail); Eric Strickland (E-mail); Gayleen Barre=
tt (E-mail); Ginger& Michael Brown (E-mail); Harriet Turk (E-mail); Herman =
Green (E-mail); Slone, Jeanie; Jerry Ward (E-mail); John Schilke (E-mail); =
Kathy Wright (E-mail); Karla Dailey (E-mail); Linda Ward Elam (E-mail); Lis=
a Rosenberg (E-mail); Melissa Reese (E-mail); Matt Mitten (E-mail); Mike & =
Rosalia Nolan (E-mail); Mike Wardell (E-mail); Monica Padilla (E-mail); Nat=
alie & Bret Boehmer (E-mail); Sally McElroy (E-mail); Scott Connelly (E-mai=
l); Shawn McElmoyl (E-mail); Stanton Scott (E-mail); Susie Lejune (E-mail);=
Theresa Cline (E-mail); Tina lovett (E-mail); Wayne Brown (E-mail); Wes Ke=
rsey (E-mail); Yonnie Waller (E-mail); Olinger, Kimberly S.; Brewer, Stacey=
J.; 'wenderachels@aol.com'; Semperger, Cara; Fuller, Dave; Lucci, Paul T.;=
Nemec, Gerald; Vann, Suzanne; Heintzelman, Pete; McDonald, Rob; Vint, Pete=
r; Foster, Chris H.; Mainzer, Elliot; Wente, Laura; Platter, Phillip; 'ssca=
stle@srpnet.com'; Gerard, Camille; 'jana.morse@dynegy.com'; Cross, Edith EE=
S; 'george.denos@neg.pge.com'; 'brad.king@usa.conoco.com'; 'lawrence.pope@h=
aliburton.com'; Arnold, John; 'lisabarnwell1@yahoo.com'; 'kward1@houston.rr=
.com'; Miller, Stephanie; 'tomd1966@yahoo.com'; 'antlulu2@aol.com'; Kennedy=
, Susan L.; 'ilandman@verizon.net'
Subject:=09FW: FW: Forward Warning
I received this email today from a very good friend of mine who has a lot =
of close friends from India. This letter is to one of those close friends.=
I don't know if I should pass it around but I want everyone I know to be =
aware.
Kim
> >
> >This is worth forwarding, just incase. . .
> >
> >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> >=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> >
> >PLEASE READ!
> >Subject: Malls on 10/31
> >
> >Hey guys..I dont want to scare anyone..but its better safe than sorry,
> >right?? This is not just a foward I recieved..Its from one of my
> >colleages at JPMorgan. It's been sent around within the firm, I wanted
> >to pass it on just in case.
> >Hi All -
> >I think you all know that I don't send out hoaxes and don't
> >do the reactionary thing and send out anything that crosses my
> >path.
> >This one, however, is a friend of a friend and I've given it
> >enough credibility in my mind that I'm writing it up and sending it out
> >to all of you.
> >My friend's friend was dating a guy from Afghanistan up until a month
> >ago. She had a date with him around 9/6 and was stood up. She was
> >understandably upset and went to his home to find it completely emptied.
> >On 9/10, she received a letter from her boyfriend explaining that
> >he
> >wished he could tell her why he had left and that he was sorry it
> >had to be like that. The part worth mentioning is that he BEGGED her
> >not to get on any commercial airlines on 9/11 and to not to go any malls
> >on Halloween.
> >As soon as everything happened on the 11th, she called the FBI and has
> >since turned over the letter. This is not an email that I've received
> >and decided to pass on. This came from a phone conversation with a
> >long-time friend of mine last night.
> >I may be wrong, and I hope I am. However, with one of his warnings
> >being correct and devastating, I'm not willing to take the chance on the
> >second and wanted to make sure that people I cared about had the same
> >information that I did.
> >Laura Katsis
> >Implementation Specialist
> >714/921-5424
> >lkatsis@volt.com <mailto:lkatsis@volt.com>
> >OpsVolt_Track@volt.com <mailto:OpsVolt_Track@volt.com>
> >
> >
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------------
> >Reminder: E-mail sent through the Internet is not secure.
> >Do not use e-mail to send us confidential information
> >such as credit card numbers, changes of address, PIN
> >numbers, passwords, or other important information.
> >Do not e-mail orders to buy or sell securities, transfer
> >funds, or send time sensitive instructions. We will not
> >accept such orders or instructions. This e-mail is not
> >an official trade confirmation for transactions executed
> >for your account. Your e-mail message is not private in
> >that it is subject to review by the Firm, its officers,
> >agents and employees.
> >--------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >**********************************************************************
> >This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate
> >and may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
> >the intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure
by
> >others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
> >authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or
> >reply to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and
delete
> >all copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are
not
> >intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence
a
> >binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
> >affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not b=
e
> >relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
> >Thank you.
> >**********************************************************************
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.as=
p
>
>
|
[] | 4 | 2,145 |
scholtes-d
|
|
133.
|
82b35a93-d0d2-4625-9459-a7dbbf337db8
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 14:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
|
FW: Registration for New E-tag 1.7 data
|
How do we feel about having approval/denial authority in E-tag for all of the El Paso stuff. How does it work now?
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Lynn Costantini [mailto:Lynn.Costantini@nerc.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 12:41 PM
To: info@tsin.com
Subject: Registration for New E-tag 1.7 data
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Registration of new data elements as required by E-tag 1.7 can
commence immediately. Please go to http://reg.tsin.com, click
Registrant's Area, and log onto your account for more information.
Documents pertaining to electronic tagging, including
"Electronic Tagging: Functional Specification, Version 1.7" and "What's
New in E-tag 1.7" are available from
http://www.nerc.com/~filez/tag/E-tag/E-Tag.htm.
Please email info@tsin.com if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Lynn P. Costantini
Robert W. Cummings
NERC
609-452-8060
|
[] | 38 | 232 |
scholtes-d
|
|
134.
|
7543bb89-cc39-420f-b364-84bfe1f4d636
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"julie.kearney@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
|
RE: Super Saturdays!
|
Either Saturday will be fine.
diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Kearney, Julie
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 10:28 AM
To: Mainzer, Elliot; Foster, Chris H.; Choi, Paul; Mallory, Chris; Rosman, Stewart; Wente, Laura; Alonso, Tom; Perry, Todd; Buerkle, Jim; Etringer, Michael; Fuller, Dave; Fischer, Mark; Van Gelder, John; Williams III, Bill; Motley, Matt; Badeer, Robert; Swerzbin, Mike; Scholtes, Diana; Nelson, Kourtney; Page, Jonalan; Swain, Steve; Savage, Gordon; Gilbert, Jim; Slaughter, Jeff G.; Richter, Jeff; Thomas, Jake
Cc: Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.; Sheppard, Kathryn; Chatterton, Jill; Gustafson, Mollie; Mehrer, Anna; Davidson, Debra
Subject: Super Saturdays!
Fall Recruiting for Associates & Analysts is here once again and you have been elected to participate in our Super Saturday Event!
This year, the onsite interviews are scheduled for two Saturdays in November. On each Saturday, the top 9 - 12 candidates from our local schools will be present. This will help tremendously with our cross-calibration process. The dates and schools are as follows:
Saturday, November 10, candidates will be drawn from:
University of Portland
University of Oregon
University of Washington
Washington State University
Saturday, November 17, candidates will be drawn from:
Portland State University
UC Davis (Associate candidates only)
Oregon State University
We will need you to participate in at least one of these Saturday events. We will also need 5-6 people to overlap and attend both Saturdays, so please volunteer if you are able. (PS: If we don't have enough overlap, we will have to begin "drafting", so please help out where you can.)
TASK ITEM: Please respond to this message, indicating which Saturday(s) you will be able to attend.
If you have any questions, please give me a call. Thank you in advance for your help. It is very much appreciated!
Julie K
x7404
|
[] | 17 | 514 |
scholtes-d
|
|
135.
|
9274b6b6-0d8e-4f51-9f3d-df61bfaa1432
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"'linn@enron.com",
"yslinn@bpa.gov"
] |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:42:47 -0700 (PDT)
|
RE: WSPP mtg -
|
Hey Young!
Perfect timing I tell you, Natalie came down with the croup. Hence I'm staying here to take care of her cuz Dad's out of town also. Real bummer because there's a lot of fun going to happen up there! Have a good time! Maybe we can go hiking around here!
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Linn, Young S - PTF-5 [mailto:yslinn@bpa.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2001 11:03 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: WSPP mtg -
Hi!
I'm thinking about going for a hike, around the lake, Thursday afternoon.
The area supposed to be very pretty. Do you already have a plan?
Young
|
[] | 81 | 100 |
scholtes-d
|
|
136.
|
b356991f-cf07-48af-a028-c6f90619996f
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Thu, 11 Oct 2001 13:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
|
SEPT
|
9/23 Bill C. fixed this day and we check
9/24 To MPC-EPMI Colstrip s/b priced with the .10 cent adder peak & off peak
To EPMI MC Memo {800 mw @ 18.40} s/b priced with the 1.50 parking/lending adder
* OK for the hard part! our nets are ok for the balance of the problem but they aren't priced correctly.
We have a 101 peak plus a 25 peaker (15-20) totaling 1766 mwh's that s/b priced @ 20.55
Then we parked/lended for a total of 590 mwh that s/b priced @ 21.95.
You have them dispursed between several accounts: To BPA-EPMI (PGE sys)= 497 mw
To PGE CA EPMI Sale = 1459 @ 20.55 & 400 @ 21.55
Purchases= $ 156,755.00
Sales= $ 147,439.00
9/25 I BELIEVE OUR INDICES ARE OFF- I SHOW 18.98 PEAK & 16.60 OFF PEAK???? Every account you have on this day is off. Or maybe I have the wrong index!
|
[] | 292 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
137.
|
4a2ea779-6c4b-4909-bede-f35ee88d447d
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:15:05 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Employment Application
|
Hi Amy!
So glad to have you back! I talked to Grace this morning and she said it was ups'd yesterday. I submitted it last week, so I'm not sure why the delay. Please let me know if you don't receive it today. Talk to you soon!
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:27 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Employment Application
Diana -
Our records indicate that we haven't received your employment application. If you have turned it in to Julie, can you please let me know? Otherwise, please complete the attached document to me via fax (713-646-2308) as soon as possible.
Thanks!
Amy
<< File: EmpApp.pdf >>
|
[] | 72 | 118 |
scholtes-d
|
|
138.
|
0cbaf80b-abe9-454e-a4dd-cbb98c91843c
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"sean.crandall@enron.com"
] |
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:08:54 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: (no subject)
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Hara, Kathy [mailto:KHara@avistaenergy.com]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:32 AM
To: Big Johnson (E-mail); Brian Malley (E-mail); Semperger, Cara; Chris
Coast (E-mail); Craig Nielson (E-mail); Dan Logman (E-mail); Scholtes,
Diana; Jim Ewers (E-mail); Joe Cole (E-mail); John Hughes (E-mail); Jon
Perry (E-mail); Kevin McMahan (E-mail); Lance Titus (E-mail); Burnett,
Lisa; Little Boogie (E-mail); Meg Coleman (E-mail); Nathan Joyner
(E-mail); Patrick Jackson (E-mail); Randy Enders (E-mail); Robb Gray
(E-mail); Ron Hadwiger (E-mail); Stephanie Gerk (E-mail); Todd
Brinkmeyer (E-mail); Uncle Krusty (E-mail); Kevin Watler (E-mail)
Subject: FW: (no subject)
I've seen this one before, but it's always funny...
BEER
I have not seen anyone explain this as well as Cliff Clavin, on Cheers. The
Buffalo Theory as told by Cliff Clavin: One afternoon at Cheers, Cliff
Clavin was explaining the Buffalo Theory to his buddy Norm, and here's how
it went: "Well ya see, Norm, it's like this... A herd of buffalo can only
move as fast as the slowest buffalo. And when the herd is hunted, it is the
slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural
selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and
health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the
weakest members. "In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as
fast as the slowest brain cells. Excessive intake of alcohol, as we know,
kills brain cells. But naturally it attacks the slowest and weakest brain
cells first. In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker
brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine." That's
why you always feel smarter after a few beers
|
[] | 4 | 502 |
scholtes-d
|
|
139.
|
1fa33563-dbcc-4294-a9ac-3f1f4ef04ec1
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"premierpumpcompany@home.com"
] |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:13:04 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Update
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: =09Belden, Tim =20
Sent:=09Friday, November 30, 2001 8:49 AM
To:=09DL-Portland World Trade Center; DL-San Francisco
Subject:=09Update
There have been no "official" developments relating to Enron North America =
or the Portland office that I am aware of since the floor meeting on Wednes=
day. The news of the Europe office closing so suddenly has certainly been =
unsettling. Absent any tangible news pertaining to the fate of our office =
I thought that I could, at a minimum, try to explain to people what I've se=
en going on over the last couple of days.
On the trading side we are doing several things. First, we are trying to h=
onor as many of our physical delivery obligations as possible. Several cus=
tomers have stopped making deliveries to us which is making it impossible f=
or us, in turn, to honor all of our physical deliveries. In these circumst=
ances we are constantly updating our customers on the status of their sched=
ules so that they can make alternative arraingements. The Cash Trading, Sc=
heduling, Services, and Real Time groups are doing an unbelievable job with=
this. I am impressed at how capable, professional, and calm our team has =
remained. On the Term Trading side we are working with our customers to cl=
ose out positions. This process is going very smoothly as well. We traded=
a record volume yesterday as our customers reduced their exposure to us. =
The Term trading team has done an excellent job with this. Third, on the M=
iddle Market and Origination side we are trying to work with customers to b=
ring cash in the door. Many customers owe us money due to out of the money=
future positions. Many customers would prefer to settle up with us now ra=
ther than in bankruptcy if that is what ends up happening to us. We have b=
rought a significant amount of cash in the door as a result of these effort=
s and saved our customers from going through a potentially onerous bankrupt=
cy proceeding. I am very appreciative of the efforts of our Origination an=
d Middle Marketing team that has made this happen.
On the bright side, I remain optimistic that someone will buy or fund the N=
orth America gas and power businesses. While it is impossible to handicap =
anything these days with Enron I am seeing some very positive signs on this=
front. Unlike the Dynegy deal, which required Dynegy to purchase the very=
profitable core business along along with the rest of Enron's baggage, the=
deals being considered now would likely involve only the core business. I=
don't know whether these deals happen, and if they do, I don't know what f=
orm the core business takes as a result. Chris Calger and I have been part=
of the team talking to our potential suitors. We will both be in Houston =
through the weekend and into early next week working on this. We will upda=
te people as soon as possible as things unfold.
I know that this situation really sucks. Given the anxiety and uncertainty=
that we are all feeling people are doing a great job keeping focused and s=
taying positive. I think that things are going to unfold very quickly from=
here -- most likely in the next week or two. Please hang in there.
Tim
(on behalf of Tim and Chris)
|
[] | 4 | 784 |
scholtes-d
|
|
14.
|
d4ac78ee-03b5-4e4d-a659-26a172d95304
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:15:13 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: OATI Digital Certificates Deadline March 6th
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: ben.porath@oatiinc.com [mailto:ben.porath@oatiinc.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: OATI Digital Certificates Deadline March 6th
When E-Tag 1.7 is activated on March 6, 2002 the OATI webTag (ETS) system will require secure access using an OATI Digital Certificate. OATI Digital Certificates will be provided to our existing webTag customers at no additional cost under their existing ETS Agreement.
For those companies that have not yet acquired OATI Digital Certificates, to start the process, please download the Company Information document at the following URL:
http://www.oaticerts.com/repository/company_information.doc
Complete the form, and then e-mail it to OATI at support@oatiinc.com. Please do not delay, get this service today to avoid access problems on March 6.
For those companies that have already acquired OATI Digital Certificates, our OATI webTag Administrator will be contacting your company shortly to activate this service with your current E-Tag 1.67 access.
If you have questions, please feel free to contact us at (763) 553-2725 or support@oatiinc.com.
|
[] | 4 | 303 |
scholtes-d
|
|
15.
|
974cd420-18e0-4158-8254-1602e5a3a4dd
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"premierpumpcompany@attbi.com"
] |
Fri, 25 Jan 2002 12:14:58 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO ALL EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATING IN THE ENRON
CORP SAVINGS & ESOP PLANS
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Enron General Announcements
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:52 PM
To: DL-GA-all_domestic
Subject: IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO ALL EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATING IN THE ENRON CORP SAVINGS & ESOP PLANS
PLEASE READ THIS IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNING THE ENRON STOCK FUND IN THE ENRON CORP. SAVINGS AND ESOP PLANS
On Friday, January 11, trading of Enron stock was suspended on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). All Savings and ESOP Plan transactions, including 401(k) payroll contributions, involving this fund were placed in a pending status until trading resumed.
As announced by Enron's Office of the Chair on Wednesday, January 16, Enron stock would now be traded Over The Counter (OTC). Upon receiving this information, work began immediately to develop a process that allows for OTC trades in the plans.
On Thursday, January 17, Enron initiated a process to facilitate OTC trades of Enron stock inside the 401(k) and ESOP and all pending transactions were processed using Thursday's closing price.
Now that trading has resumed, we urge you to review your investment elections to ensure that they are consistent with your investment goals.
As things change, we will continue to update you.
Enron Benefits Department
|
[] | 4 | 311 |
scholtes-d
|
|
16.
|
a947ca54-b342-46e6-8fd1-0245b29c10a7
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"virginia.thompson@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 16:11:04 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Modesto
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 9:00 AM
To: Purcell, Mike
Subject: FW: Modesto
Hey----We didn't use it on the 10th. So i revised the spreadsheet and updated Enpower.
ds
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Williams, Gwendolyn
Cc: Purcell, Mike
Subject: RE: Modesto
I talked to Arvina this morning and she noticed that she has calculated the loss return using the wrong indicies. She will be fixing that this morning. I am attaching a summary of the loss return calculation and a quick summary of checking I did against Arvina spreadsheet. There is a deal that we entered in differently, but the net result is the same.
Diana
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Gwendolyn
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:49 AM
To: Purcell, Mike; Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Crandall, Sean
Subject: RE: Modesto
Mike
Were do we stand w/Modesto they are wanting to finish up Nov Prod.?
Gwen
-----Original Message-----
From: Purcell, Mike
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Williams, Gwendolyn; Crandall, Sean
Subject: Modesto
Diana,
I heard back from Gwen and she has given me these deals to be fixed according to Modesto's spreadsheet.
Sales
875830.1.2 and 875819.2 Need to have a price of $29.00 11/7-11/30
Purchases
875830.3 and 875819.3 Need to have a price of $31.00 11/7-11/30
The deals above total 15,200 mw's. The deals that could be the problem are transmission deal 860363.1 at a $0.00 and Purchase annuities 859311.1 and 859389.1 @ $1.36, these deals total 15,200 mw's.
Also, starting on the 7th we need to put in losses of 36 mw's per day using the Dow NP15 index price.
let me know if you have any questions and what I can do to help.
Thanks
Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297
|
[] | 4 | 609 |
scholtes-d
|
|
17.
|
d3e81c91-f4c7-442c-a1ce-6742ea643515
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"ameher@aep.com"
] |
Mon, 21 Jan 2002 21:18:44 -0800 (PST)
|
D. Scholtes' resume
|
Anna,
Thank you for taking the time to forward my resume to Ohio. Hope everything is going well for you!
Diana Scholtes
|
[] | 33 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
18.
|
75535636-6d58-4043-b5b4-11ad3f549cfa
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:21:57 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: November detail
|
Our Purchases:
11/1 To PSE-EPMI MC - you have 23mw @ 35.58 and it should be @ 35.68. Total= 210,080.72
11/6 We are out by the 1mw real loss return that you should show. Total= 60,503.77
11/14 I think you have wrong indicies. Really really wrong! =)
11/15 To MPC-EPMI Colstrip- you have 96 MW price wrong. Should be @ 19.69. Total=49,993.27
11/16 To BPA-EPMI @ MC- 36mw s/b @ 18.66 & To PSE-EPMI @ MC s/b @ 18.66. Total=50,286.56
11/17 Same as the 16th but a different dispursment of mw's between accounts. Total= 50,303.73
11/26 To PSE-EPMI @ MC 32mw s/b priced @ 17.54 & 48mw s/b @ 20.53. Total= 52,932.97
With these changes we will match on our purchases. Total = $2,105,816.35
I'll look at my sales and send it along.
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: November detail
Hi Diana,
Not sure I sent this to you, but thought I would send it now just in case.
Anne
|
[] | 306 | 72 |
scholtes-d
|
|
19.
|
296c8d00-a193-4ed3-849d-0cd4214397f9
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"acullen@firstcallassociates.com"
] |
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:08:05 -0800 (PST)
|
References
|
Audrey,
Sorry to get this to you today. I had originally sent this to you from home and it didn't work, so we'll try to do this from here at work. I have listed some people and referenced their region. Hope this is what you were looking for. Have a nice weekend!
Diana Scholtes
Northwest
Dale Hubbard Avista/Washington Water Power 509-495-4911
Kathy Hara Avista Energy 509-495-8712
Dan Sparks Idaho Power Company 208-275-8300
Paul Wood Pacificorp 503-813-5387
Northern California
Kevin McMahon NCPA 916-786-0123
John Perry Sierra Pacific 775-834-3529
Spence Gerber CISO 916-351-2284
Pete Garris CERS 916-574-1299
|
[] | 232 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
2.
|
8915c4e0-75dd-457d-a809-b99d3595db69
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"tim.belden@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:42:48 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Mid-C Seminar
|
I'm not sure how much money is in the fund for these types of events, but it may help get our name out there.
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Frazier, Doug [mailto:Douglas@chelanpud.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: FW: Mid-C Seminar
You're on the list again! See you next week, Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frazier, Doug
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:36 PM
> To: Doug Andrews (E-mail); Bert Brehm (E-mail); Josi Keyser (E-mail);
> Kevin Holland (E-mail); Michael Dehaven (E-mail); Peter Blood (E-mail);
> Todd Torgerson (E-mail); Eric Strickland (E-mail); Scott Connelly
> (E-mail); Mike Lynch (E-mail); Dick Barnette (E-mail); Joe Morrato
> (E-mail); Andrew Goldberg (E-mail)
> Cc: Frazier, Doug
> Subject: Mid-C Seminar
>
> I'm happy to announce (you're the first to know, officially) that we are
> once again hosting the 6th annual Mid-C Marketing Seminar here in
> Wenatchee. The dates are July 9th for a semi-pro baseball game & BBQ, July
> 10th for the meeting and July 11th for a golf tournament. I realize this
> is an early request, but helps with the logistics as we approach the
> dates.
>
> Last year, your company helped us by making a donation in the amount of
> $500.00 toward sponsorship of the golf tournament. That was very
> beneficial to Mid-C Services, played a large part in the success of the
> seminar and we appreciated it very much.
>
> We are offering you the same opportunity this year. Chelan PUD cannot
> legally sponsor this tournament, so your participation is important.
> Please don't feel obligated, but if this works for you, we will publicize
> your sponsorship as much as possible during the 2-day event.
>
> Most importantly, we want you to join us and participate in the learning
> and fun. Please respond to me at your convenience.
>
> Thank You, Doug
> 509-665-7867
|
[] | 36 | 526 |
scholtes-d
|
|
20.
|
4852bbfb-3fb1-4faf-a13d-e54fb3364822
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"grace.rodriguez@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 14:20:41 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: FOLLOW-UP: Were you able to pick up your parking access card?
|
Yes! Thanks for all your help!
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Rodriguez, Grace
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:50 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: FOLLOW-UP: Were you able to pick up your parking access card?
|
[] | 17 | 54 |
scholtes-d
|
|
21.
|
856d3015-e34b-45c2-a782-8799ea31c354
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"stephen.thome@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 12:51:37 -0800 (PST)
|
Wire funds to Avista
|
Steve,
Please wire $301,632.00 to Avista. This will cover our NW book of business for January 20 thru January 26. I will e-mail you the net P& L associated with this transaction as soon as I find the original spreadsheet. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Diana
|
[] | 74 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
22.
|
0264d4f5-9bf0-4920-8532-221e342f6c87
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"alan.comnes@enron.com"
] |
Mon, 14 Jan 2002 14:19:48 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Conference Call with Houston
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Thome, Stephen
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Murphy, Harlan; Rasmussen, Dale; Hall, Steve C. (Legal); Thomas, Jake; Alonso, Tom; Richter, Brad; Crandall, Sean; Scholtes, Diana; Mallory, Chris; Salisbury, Holden; Fischer, Mark; Platter, Phillip
Cc: Baughman, Edward; Brysch, Jim; Wax, Brandon; Belden, Tim; Calger, Christopher F.
Subject: Conference Call with Houston
Houston has requested we sit down with them on the phone and go over all the in-the-money contracts we have. By their count we have about 50. They want to account for each and understand why we may not be delivering on them.
Ed Baughman will be sending his master list in advance of a 11:30 call in Mt. Bachelor. Please send at least one representative from each of the regional desks to discuss the list.
Thanks,
Steve
|
[] | 4 | 234 |
scholtes-d
|
|
23.
|
82b72439-cd3c-4ca3-b001-c825346d61f1
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"kevinm@ncpa.com"
] |
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:14:06 -0800 (PST)
|
FW:
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: William Scholtes [mailto:premierpumpcompany@home.com]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 11:02 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject:
From the desk of
Bill Scholtes
Premier Pump Company
|
[] | 4 | 63 |
scholtes-d
|
|
24.
|
bbe66001-5239-4659-a4a6-80fe599097ba
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"kevinm@ncpa.com"
] |
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:12:53 -0800 (PST)
|
FW:
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: William Scholtes [mailto:premierpumpcompany@home.com]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 8:34 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject:
From the desk of
Bill Scholtes
Premier Pump Company
|
[] | 4 | 63 |
scholtes-d
|
|
25.
|
9b8bd734-1a76-4f45-9517-bbd5f6bbf60e
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"david.steiner@enron.com"
] |
Fri, 11 Jan 2002 15:39:13 -0800 (PST)
|
December Settlements
|
P:| Trading|California|CaScheduling|Cash/Postion| (CA,NW,SW) needs to be made available for Houston settlements.
Thank you,
Diana Scholtes
|
[] | 46 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
26.
|
4375bf0a-1993-449d-99ef-c6db583eeab0
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"will.smith@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 18:21:13 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Auto Scheduler
|
Hey Will!
Remeber us dicussing deals showing up in Real-Time Position manager that are the EPMI-West-Bank. Can you remove these from this view?
thanks,
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Smith, Will
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 7:55 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: RE: Auto Scheduler
For the West:
Schedule: 12/14/2001 - 12/28/2001
Analysis: 4/2/1996 - 12/13/2001
Regards,
Will
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Smith, Will
Subject: Auto Scheduler
Will,
Can you tell me what day was the last to be rolled in Auto Scheduler? I'm trying to go back into December to balance Enpower for Settlement purposes.
Thank you,
Diana Scholtes
503-464-3807
|
[] | 55 | 192 |
scholtes-d
|
|
27.
|
4398dabd-bb09-41c5-b383-fbf14dd8247d
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:00:57 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: October detail
|
10/11
Sales to PGE- Missing 50 mw llh buy/resale System to Mid-c.
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: October detail
|
[] | 35 | 44 |
scholtes-d
|
|
28.
|
5cae4fb0-353a-48d4-bcac-060744aae0a2
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"mike.purcell@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:00:01 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Modesto
|
Hey----We didn't use it on the 10th. So i revised the spreadsheet and updated Enpower.
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:55 AM
To: Williams, Gwendolyn
Cc: Purcell, Mike
Subject: RE: Modesto
I talked to Arvina this morning and she noticed that she has calculated the loss return using the wrong indicies. She will be fixing that this morning. I am attaching a summary of the loss return calculation and a quick summary of checking I did against Arvina spreadsheet. There is a deal that we entered in differently, but the net result is the same.
Diana
-----Original Message-----
From: Williams, Gwendolyn
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:49 AM
To: Purcell, Mike; Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Crandall, Sean
Subject: RE: Modesto
Mike
Were do we stand w/Modesto they are wanting to finish up Nov Prod.?
Gwen
-----Original Message-----
From: Purcell, Mike
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Williams, Gwendolyn; Crandall, Sean
Subject: Modesto
Diana,
I heard back from Gwen and she has given me these deals to be fixed according to Modesto's spreadsheet.
Sales
875830.1.2 and 875819.2 Need to have a price of $29.00 11/7-11/30
Purchases
875830.3 and 875819.3 Need to have a price of $31.00 11/7-11/30
The deals above total 15,200 mw's. The deals that could be the problem are transmission deal 860363.1 at a $0.00 and Purchase annuities 859311.1 and 859389.1 @ $1.36, these deals total 15,200 mw's.
Also, starting on the 7th we need to put in losses of 36 mw's per day using the Dow NP15 index price.
let me know if you have any questions and what I can do to help.
Thanks
Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297
|
[] | 33 | 532 |
scholtes-d
|
|
29.
|
0f2e61dd-6b3d-4e0c-b54c-b59e9aaa2330
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"gwendolyn.williams@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 12:55:02 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Modesto
|
I talked to Arvina this morning and she noticed that she has calculated the loss return using the wrong indicies. She will be fixing that this morning. I am attaching a summary of the loss return calculation and a quick summary of checking I did against Arvina spreadsheet. There is a deal that we entered in differently, but the net result is the same.
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Williams, Gwendolyn
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 6:49 AM
To: Purcell, Mike; Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Crandall, Sean
Subject: RE: Modesto
Mike
Were do we stand w/Modesto they are wanting to finish up Nov Prod.?
Gwen
-----Original Message-----
From: Purcell, Mike
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 3:56 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Williams, Gwendolyn; Crandall, Sean
Subject: Modesto
Diana,
I heard back from Gwen and she has given me these deals to be fixed according to Modesto's spreadsheet.
Sales
875830.1.2 and 875819.2 Need to have a price of $29.00 11/7-11/30
Purchases
875830.3 and 875819.3 Need to have a price of $31.00 11/7-11/30
The deals above total 15,200 mw's. The deals that could be the problem are transmission deal 860363.1 at a $0.00 and Purchase annuities 859311.1 and 859389.1 @ $1.36, these deals total 15,200 mw's.
Also, starting on the 7th we need to put in losses of 36 mw's per day using the Dow NP15 index price.
let me know if you have any questions and what I can do to help.
Thanks
Mike P. Purcell
Settlements Coordinator
Volume Management-Portland
503-464-8297
|
[] | 91 | 387 |
scholtes-d
|
|
3.
|
14380088-3470-4276-9ac3-796ee0033d3e
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"virginia.thompson@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:17:39 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: PGE Transmission Annuity
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Robinson, Donald
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:28 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: FW: PGE Transmission Annuity
Here you go.
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thome, Stephen
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:09 AM
To: Robinson, Donald; Lew, Elsie; Elafandi, Mo
Cc: Sewell, Doug
Subject: PGE Transmission Annuity
Don,
Can you please modify the PGE Transmission Annuity in Enpower to reflect the following:
It is current set at $152,668.80. Our payment due to PGE is $101,304.00.
According to Elsie, we need to log a Sale Annuity for $51,364.80
Thanks,
Steve Thome
x3806
|
[] | 4 | 212 |
scholtes-d
|
|
30.
|
a3aa8e50-8c03-490a-bc1f-19932f88f420
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"tom.alonso@enron.com",
"stephen.thome@enron.com",
"paul.choi@enron.com",
"mark.fischer@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:46:12 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Wire instructions and Applications for APS
|
Steve- Below is the wire transfer information needed to pay the November bill.
Paul- Also attached are blank enabling agreements needed for transmission. Mark Hackney said the turn around for this can be 1 to 2 days and with credit established he can waive the deposits.
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Hackney, Mark W(Z39911) [mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 8:39 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Wire instructions and Applications
wire transfer information
ABA # 121000248
Well Fargo Bank
707 Wilshire Blvd.
LA, CA 90017
Acct # 4159540921
Applications for new:
The POR/POD stuff is not needed to be specific, just as determined at time
of OASIS request.
<<Firm PtP Transmission Service Application Form.doc>> <<NonFirm PtP
Transmission Service Application Form.doc>>
Mark W. Hackney
Section Leader
Pre and Real-time Transmission Scheduling, AGC Operations
APS OATT Administration
Arizona Public Service Company
602.250.1128 - Office
602.908.1423 - Cell
602.250.1155 - Fax
mailto:Mark.Hackney@aps.com
|
[] | 69 | 230 |
scholtes-d
|
|
31.
|
d6c61298-53f3-48b4-bc50-d7ea6b6b1c01
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:55:51 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: October detail
|
10/11 We are in trouble. You have some price points that don't make sense. We should go thru this day together.
10/12 To BPA-EPMI RP-LS-MC .....there should be 3 mw off peak priced at 22.27. Total Purch= $74,629.93
10/17 You don't show the lending; 13 mw off peak at system.
10/21 You should have a total of 1200 mw @ $29.21 adder and 600 @ $24.81. I fixed the 600 mw descrepancy that we had. Total Purchase = $103,251.56
Total Sale = $ 96,342.80
10/22 To PCW-EPMI Sale -MC you show 400 @ 24.81. I show 200 @ that price and 200 should be priced with a 60 cent adder for busbar/mid.c
Total Purch= $98,692.26
10/28 To BPA-EPMI(PGE SYS) You have 1 mw priced @ 28.73 instead of 28.83. Total Purch= $76,287.15
10/29 To BPA EPMI-RP-LS MC ....is priced at $35.35 and it should be at 34.47 Total Purch= $118,078.79
10/31 To MPC-EPMI Colstrip - you have 14 mw priced at $30 and it should be at 30.48. Total Purch= $123,318.72
send you some more later!!!
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: October detail
|
[] | 374 | 44 |
scholtes-d
|
|
32.
|
eb2fb741-e52e-4ecf-923e-57e2e87c9e07
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"bill.casey@enron.com"
] |
Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:33:00 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: other recommendation
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Hall, Steve C. (Legal)
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: other recommendation
http://www.gevurtzmenashe.com
|
[] | 4 | 58 |
scholtes-d
|
|
33.
|
44451af8-e99f-475d-b9be-f5cc880535a6
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 14:11:43 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: October detail
|
Sales to PGE:
10/3 After you put in the lending for this day, I agree we are still out by 150 mw. Its down to two schedules; can you check to see what you show for the Montana buy/resale. This should be 32 peak everyday. The other for the day is our pge system to grizzly this should be 26 mw peak. You have the correct number of MW's coming to us but not going to you.
10/5 & 10/6 You show 200 more llh....I don't know why????
10/8 The 200 mw you show llh should be a total of 256 (32 llh due to colstrip). Call me to go thru the hourly at your system to find our 2 mw descrepancy. You have the correct number of MW's coming to us but not going to you.
10/9 You show 8 mw @ 24.20 under To BPA-EPMI RP-LS-MC account. Don't know what that is? You also only show it on one side??
I'll send more when i get thru it!!
diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: October detail
|
[] | 271 | 44 |
scholtes-d
|
|
34.
|
b0815fcf-003d-49ec-bd20-08edb90e339b
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"leslie.reeves@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 12:43:04 -0800 (PST)
|
January Settlements
|
Leslie,
I'm trying to get a jump on making sure we have everything done properly in Enpower for the month of January. My question is whether we, the West desk, should enter any changes in Enpower due to OUR non-delivery and/or incremental deals? We have everything recorded on our Trade sheets, but if it would make it easier for you to settle or relay to the Estate by us making the changes in Deal Scheduling, we can do so.
I also understand, after talking to John, you will be using our Trade sheets for such changes for the month of December. I'm not sure who you would like us to assist in translating our sheets, but if you can call me, we can set up a conference call and I'll coordinate from each desk to attend.
If there is anything else that you need us to do to help your group please let me know.
Diana Scholtes
West Desk
503-464-3807
|
[] | 213 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
35.
|
5f4138ca-42d8-489a-b9e9-11235c9cb950
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"mkane@jobmenu.com"
] |
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:54:13 -0800 (PST)
|
RE:
|
Michael,
I had a family emergency that I had to attend to prior to the holidays. So I apologize, I haven't been in town. Not sure what happened with our pre-arranged days to have discussions with your prospect, but hopefully we can reschedule. Considering my situation now with my family, I will not be looking for a re-location anytime soon, but rather something either in Portland or within the West. If Exelon is willing to explore opportunities with that in mind, then please set some time aside to discuss. You can continue to reach me either at home (360-834-3579) or at work (503-464-3807). I no longer have a cell phone available at this time. Thank you for your time. Hope your holidays were good.
Regards,
Diana Scholtes
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Michael Kane [mailto:mkane@jobmenu.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 10:50 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Re:
Diana,
Trying to reach you - should we arrange conversation tomorrow with Exelon or
pull the plug they have called us 3 times to coordinate- please give me some
feedback.
Michael P. Kane
Kane & Associates
mkane@jobmenu.com
713-977-3600
----- Original Message -----
From: Scholtes, Diana <Diana.Scholtes@ENRON.com>
To: <mkane@jobmenu.com>
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:53 AM
I received your message and those times are good for me. I will be in
contact with you next week.
Regards,
Diana Scholtes
**********************************************************************
This e-mail is the property of Enron Corp. and/or its relevant affiliate and
may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the
intended recipient (s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by
others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or
authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender or reply
to Enron Corp. at enron.messaging.administration@enron.com and delete all
copies of the message. This e-mail (and any attachments hereto) are not
intended to be an offer (or an acceptance) and do not create or evidence a
binding and enforceable contract between Enron Corp. (or any of its
affiliates) and the intended recipient or any other party, and may not be
relied on by anyone as the basis of a contract by estoppel or otherwise.
Thank you.
**********************************************************************
|
[] | 191 | 411 |
scholtes-d
|
|
36.
|
5f79a479-a95a-43a0-a670-92b61a837a0f
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"'malowney@enron.com",
"john.malowney@neg.pge.com"
] |
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:41:20 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Staying in touch
|
Hello John! I appreciate the recommendation, but I am not in the position right now to make a move. If they are interested in discussing a position here in the NW, I would be more interested in that. I hope everything is going well for you.
Keep in touch!
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Malowney, John [mailto:john.malowney@neg.pge.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 8:08 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Staying in touch
Diana; last week my boss and I met with Sean regarding a position within
PG&E similar to what you're currently doing. PG&E would be very interested
talking to you but the catch is the job is located in Bethesda Maryland.
Are you at all interested, and secondly would you and Sean consider residing
in Bethesda performing the exact same function you are both performing
today? The second option is a long shot but I wanted to run it by you.
Hopefully you had a pleasant Holiday. John
PG&E National Energy Group and any other
company referenced herein that uses the PG&E name or
logo are not the same company as Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, the regulated California utility. Neither
PG&E National Energy Group nor these other
referenced companies are regulated by the California Public
Utilities Commission. Customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company
do not have to buy products from these companies in order
to continue to receive quality regulated services from the utility.
|
[] | 73 | 269 |
scholtes-d
|
|
37.
|
a6a59f79-2896-40fd-9a1d-3b5572f09818
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"will.smith@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 3 Jan 2002 11:15:42 -0800 (PST)
|
Auto Scheduler
|
Will,
Can you tell me what day was the last to be rolled in Auto Scheduler? I'm trying to go back into December to balance Enpower for Settlement purposes.
Thank you,
Diana Scholtes
503-464-3807
|
[] | 59 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
38.
|
ed9b61b8-4b85-41b6-818b-fc5be66e3ea1
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"david.poston@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:35:23 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Questions about changes for the Chapter11.exe
|
What we are looking at is cleaning up for December. So the schedule strips have already been created. For settlement purposes, we have to go in and clean house. So it wouldn't help to change the deal in Deal Entry and I'm not even sure that we can do it anyway because of deal preservation. So we are looking at a time strip for example Dec 8-31 to zero out "Counter party".
I will be talking to John tomorrow morning to find out more about the West Bankruptcy book. Don't know anything about it.
Thanks again,
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Poston, David
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Questions about changes for the Chapter11.exe
Good Afternoon Diana,
Did I capture your question correctly?
The users want to update the chapter11.exe program, that was developed to 'zero-out' schedule strip volumes for a given counterparty for a given day, to allow the users to zero-out the volume for a range of days?
IT Questions
1. Schedule strips only get created for deals 2 days before day of flow. So, based on the current design, the date range, at least looking forward, would only be a couple of days.
- Option 1: Maybe, instead of zeroing out schedules, we should adjust the dates on the deal. This would prevent schedule strips from even being created after a certain date?
2. Working with John Postlethwaite & Stacey White, Will Smith has a program that converts deals from the real Enron books to a newly created West Bankruptcy book. Will this work for you guys?
Anyway, just give me a call when you get a chance.
Thanks, David Poston
713-345-7834
|
[] | 134 | 281 |
scholtes-d
|
|
39.
|
6747ef0a-ad3a-4ecf-9985-84501b111c5e
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"donald.robinson@enron.com",
"cara.semperger@enron.com",
"stacy.runswick@enron.com",
"diane.cutsforth@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:47:40 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: OASIS Posting - No Tag/No Flow Implementation Update
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Suzie Stone [mailto:sistone@bpa.gov]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 10:34 AM
To: OASISPOSTINGS-L@LIST.TRANSMISSION.BPA.GOV
Subject: OASIS Posting - No Tag/No Flow Implementation Update
Please click on the attached icon or the Web address below to go to the most recent OASIS Posting.
If that doesn't work highlight and copy the address below, then paste it into the address line of your Web browser and hit "enter":
Information on BPAT's implementation of tariff terms and conditions and/or transmission marketing policy has been posted to:
http://www.transmission.bpa.gov/oasis/bpat/scheduling/NoTagNoFlow2.doc"> No Tag/No Flow Implementation Update
For questions or comments, please contact your Transmission Account Executive.
|
[] | 4 | 202 |
scholtes-d
|
|
4.
|
a559d4f9-c3e1-49c2-9cb5-b54a08cbfe3b
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:16:50 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Drug Test for UBS
|
102nd
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:16 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: RE: Drug Test for UBS
Do you remember the location?
Thanks!
A
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 11:16 AM
To: Fitzpatrick, Amy
Subject: RE: Drug Test for UBS
Everything is getting lost! I did my drug test last Friday.
ds
-----Original Message-----
From: Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Belden, Tim
Subject: Drug Test for UBS
Diana -
Our records indicate that you have not taken your pre-employment drug test for UBS. Can you please do so ASAP, or if you have already completed, can you please let me know the date that you went so that we can update our records.
Thanks!
Amy
|
[] | 7 | 255 |
scholtes-d
|
|
40.
|
af3bc486-0eae-4a95-b461-3b07d6a1d208
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 17:29:47 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: September detail
|
Our Sales:
9/4 Your missing 1mw llh @ 21.28. Total= $93,973.24
9/19 Missing HE 15-20 25 mw buy/resale @pge sys. Total= $103,264.86
9/20 Peak= missing 25 mw HE 15-20. There should be 2 sets; 1. for the pge grizz and the second for park/lend.
Off Peak= out by 61 mw. Not sure where we are missing it.
9/27 Peak= missing 25 mw HE 15-20. There should be 2 sets; 1. for the pge grizz and the second for park/lend.
9/28 Same as the 27th. You also have 25 mw less than the 27th peak?????
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: September detail
September detail.
|
[] | 191 | 49 |
scholtes-d
|
|
41.
|
f1f0d3a4-3a8d-4288-966e-b1cb68e46111
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 13:17:04 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Checkout for November 2001
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Thompson, Virginia
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: FW: Checkout for November 2001
Diana-
We seem to be off on both Purchases and Sales for November '01 for Modesto. I'm thinking it may have to do with the $26 deal....(?)
Can you look over these numbers and tell me if you agree with Modesto. Given everything that has happened lately, I'm not sure who is correct.
Thanks,
Virginia
-----Original Message-----
From: ARVINA JULIEN [mailto:arvinaj@mid.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:07 PM
To: Thompson, Virginia; Williams, Gwendolyn
Cc: Thompson, Virginia
Subject: Checkout for November 2001
Gwen,
Please confirm my November 2001 numbers. I show that MID purchased 26,800 MWh's at $2,089,704.00 from Enron and MID had sales to Enron of 23,520 MWh's at $2,225,962.36. If you agree with my numbers, I will net invoice Enron for 3,280 MWh's for $136,258.36.
Arvina Julien
Power System Scheduler
Modesto Irrigation District
209-526-7514
arvinaj@mid.org
|
[] | 4 | 319 |
scholtes-d
|
|
42.
|
121f2b0c-93a0-49ae-b7c3-ab3311dc7abf
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"amy.clemons@enron.com"
] |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 12:58:48 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: City of Shasta Lake
|
Amy,
I have forward this to Sean Crandall to help you settle. I will be out of the office for the balance of the year.
Thanks,
Diana Scholtes
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Clemons, Amy
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana; Rosman, Stewart
Cc: Purcell, Mike
Subject: City of Shasta Lake
Diana & Stewart
I am hoping one of you can help me. I am trying to send aninvoice out to City of Shasta Lake, but there is a deal we don't show in view actuals,or CARP, etc. so it's not part of the numbers I have to invoice then on - but they say they owe it to us. It is the transmission capacity deal #839722.1 for City of Shasta Lake. They see they owe us for this deal in the amount of $36,600. Stewart, I had faxed you the confirm on #659898.1. It was a Laird Dyer deal and you were going to see if you could find out how we would settle it. I am not sure if the two deals are related, but maybe they are? Could the two of you look into these and let me know. I need to invoice them with deal #839722.1, and I also need to know if we need to do anything for deal #659898.1. Let me know.
Thanks - Amy
|
[] | 49 | 294 |
scholtes-d
|
|
43.
|
c2809fe6-2621-4743-86e5-ce221090d8ec
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"sean.crandall@enron.com"
] |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 12:57:26 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: City of Shasta Lake
|
FYI
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Clemons, Amy
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 12:31 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana; Rosman, Stewart
Cc: Purcell, Mike
Subject: City of Shasta Lake
Diana & Stewart
I am hoping one of you can help me. I am trying to send aninvoice out to City of Shasta Lake, but there is a deal we don't show in view actuals,or CARP, etc. so it's not part of the numbers I have to invoice then on - but they say they owe it to us. It is the transmission capacity deal #839722.1 for City of Shasta Lake. They see they owe us for this deal in the amount of $36,600. Stewart, I had faxed you the confirm on #659898.1. It was a Laird Dyer deal and you were going to see if you could find out how we would settle it. I am not sure if the two deals are related, but maybe they are? Could the two of you look into these and let me know. I need to invoice them with deal #839722.1, and I also need to know if we need to do anything for deal #659898.1. Let me know.
Thanks - Amy
|
[] | 7 | 294 |
scholtes-d
|
|
44.
|
1ec47b0b-2ca9-41c8-a9f2-4c8e2ac94145
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"jeff.richter@enron.com"
] |
Fri, 14 Dec 2001 11:06:00 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Only the dog knows.......
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Hara, Kathy [mailto:KHara@avistaenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Big Johnson (E-mail); Brian Malley (E-mail); Semperger, Cara; Chris
Coast (E-mail); Chris Smith (E-mail); Dan Logman (E-mail); Scholtes,
Diana; Jim Ewers (E-mail); Joe Cole (E-mail); John Hughes (E-mail); Jon
Perry (E-mail); Kathleen Dunham (E-mail); Keith Wagner (E-mail); Kenny
Miller (E-mail); Kevin McMahan (E-mail); Kevin Watler (E-mail); Kimberly
Werbner (E-mail); Burnett, Lisa; Little Boogie (E-mail); Marci Holland
(E-mail); Meg Coleman (E-mail); Nathan Joyner (E-mail); Patrick Jackson
(E-mail); Pete Karagianes (E-mail); Rameen Zahed (E-mail); Randy Enders
(E-mail); Robb Gray (E-mail); Robert Pierce (E-mail); Ron Hadwiger
(E-mail); Stephanie Gerk (E-mail); Titus Gillium (E-mail); Tom Johns
(E-mail)
Subject: FW: Only the dog knows.......
-----Original Message-----
From: Fewel, George
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 13:43
To: Hara, Kathy; Downing, Staci; Voelker, Carie
Subject: FW: Only the dog knows.......
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffery, Leon
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 6:13 AM
To: Fewel, George
Subject: FW: Only the dog knows.......
-----Original Message-----
From: ljeffery@teviainc.com [mailto:ljeffery@teviainc.com]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 3:09 PM
To: ljeffery@avistaenergy.com
Subject: FW: Only the dog knows.......
Subject: FW: Only the dog knows.......
-----Disgusting
The information contained in this message is privileged and
confidential.
It is intended solely for the use of the named recipient. If you are
not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this transmission is
strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please
notify
the sender immediately. Thank you.
|
[] | 4 | 584 |
scholtes-d
|
|
46.
|
3a558190-9012-4567-b9a5-76ea6b5febcf
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"stacy.runswick@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 13 Dec 2001 12:56:43 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Winter Wear
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Hara, Kathy [mailto:KHara@avistaenergy.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 7:36 AM
To: Semperger, Cara; Chris Coast (E-mail); Scholtes, Diana; John Hughes (E-mail); Jon Perry (E-mail); Kathleen Dunham (E-mail); Keith Wagner (E-mail); Kevin McMahan (E-mail); Burnett, Lisa; Little Boogie (E-mail); Meg Coleman (E-mail); Stephanie Gerk (E-mail)
Subject: FW: Winter Wear
Subject: Fw: Winter Wear
_____
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at <http://explorer.msn.com>
|
[] | 4 | 167 |
scholtes-d
|
|
47.
|
358705e2-4e3f-47e2-8da7-6584fd957567
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 19:32:30 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: August detail
|
Here we go!!!!
My Purchases:
8/9 To BPA-EPMI(PWX) 51 mw should be priced at 70.72 and not 70.22 Total= $433,054.06
|
8/17 Looks like your missing the park/lending deal [150 peak @41.21; 100 off @ 31.39] Total=$269,516.56
8/18 Same as the 17th. Total= 267,475.56
Once these are fixed I'm good on the purchase side. Will be working on my sales to you next!
thanks
ds
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:04 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: August detail
Diana, here is my August detail.
Anne
|
[] | 53 | 150 |
scholtes-d
|
|
48.
|
3261209e-e7d0-4df8-83a2-bc056767091b
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"virginia.thompson@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 12:42:18 -0800 (PST)
|
March 2001
|
Virginia,
We match for March. If you can inform whoever it is that's still here so we can follow thru our billing. We are now working on August.
Thanks,
ds
|
[] | 44 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
49.
|
e3d723ef-8b10-412e-8fb2-b8491a012652
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 11 Dec 2001 11:46:15 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: New WSCC Electronic Scheduling Work Group
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: John.Pespisa@sce.com [mailto:John.Pespisa@sce.com]
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:32 PM
To: Multiple Committees
Subject: Re: New WSCC Electronic Scheduling Work Group
Please add
1) John Pespisa, Manager Real-Time Operations, Southern California Edison
2) John.Pespisa@sce.com
3) No
4) Yes
Ronald D
Nunnally To: Kevin Cini/SCE/EIX@SCE, Doug Parker/SCE/EIX@SCE, John
Pespisa/SCE/EIX@SCE
12/06/01 cc:
05:16 PM Subject: New WSCC Electronic Scheduling Work Group
(Embedded
image moved (Embedded image moved to file: pic25106.pcx)
to file:
pic18295.pcx) FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY
FYI, in case you haven't seen this notice from WSCC. Please let me know if
you plan to participate in this group.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Nunnally
Director, Federal Regulation & Contracts
Transmission and Distribution Business Unit
Southern California Edison
Tel: 626/302-1653 - Fax: 626/302-9114
Ronald.D.Nunnally@sce.com
----- Forwarded by Ronald D Nunnally/SCE/EIX on 12/06/2001 05:15 PM -----
"JERRY
DEMPSEY" To: "Multiple Committees" <multi10@wscc.com>
<dempsey@wapa cc:
.gov> Subject: New WSCC Electronic Scheduling Work Group
Sent by:
Maiser@wscc.c
om
12/03/2001
03:34 PM
email to:
JOINT GUIDANCE COMMITTEE
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
WESTERN MARKET INTERFACE COMMITTEE
INTERCHANGE SCHEDULING and ACCOUNTING SUBCOMMITTEE
Dear JGC, OC, WMIC and ISAS,
On November 29, 2001, the WSCC Joint Guidance Committee (JGC) approved
formation of a new working group to coordinate western positions and/or
proposals on Electronic Scheduling issues and practices. This new working
group (called the WSCC Electronic Scheduling Work Group or ESWG) will
report to the JGC and coordinate with the OC, WMIC and ISAS. Attached
please find the ESWG Scope Statement.
As many of you are aware, the Electronic Scheduling Collaborative currently
being facilitated by NERC is moving forward at a rapid pace on many issues.
In order to be more productive and proactive with the formation of
electronic scheduling issues and practices, the ESWG would like to make you
aware of this new group and invite your participation and assistance to
more adequately ensure a broader representation of WSCC interests. To this
end, if you are interested in being an active member of this work group, or
if you are interested in being on the email exploder for this group, please
reply to this email as follows:
Please provide (via reply to this email):
1. Your name and organization
2. Your email address
3. Yes/No for being an active member (i.e. - you will provide comments,
attend meetings, etc as feasible)
4. Yes/No for being on the ESWG email exploder (you will receive all emails
of the working group)
Please note - if your name is listed below, then you will automatically be
added on the working group email exploder and there is no need to reply to
this email (unless you want to be removed).
Current email list -
Barbara Rehman<brehman@bpa.gov>,
Bert Gumm<rgumm@idahopower.com>
Bill Comish (WSCC)<bill@wscc.com
Bob Sullivan (CISO)<rsullivan@caiso.com>
Bruce Sembrick<bsembrick@tristategt.org>
Dean Perry <dean.perry@nwpp.org>
Dennis Eyre<dennis@wscc.com>
Duane Helderlein <dhelderlein@tristategt.org>
Ed Riley<eriley@caiso.com>
Jeff Ackerman (WAUC) <ackerman@wapa.gov
Jerry Dempsey (WACM) - <Dempsey@wapa.gov>
John Canavan<jcanavan@mtpower.com>
John Dake <dake@wapa.gov>
John Hormozi (LDWP) <jhormo@ladwp.com>
Kevin Johnson<kmjohnson@bpa.gov>
LeRoy Patterson<lpatter@mtpower.com>
Lisa Grow (IPC) <lgrow@idahopower.com>
Lorie Hoffman<Lshoffman@bpa.gov>
marcd@mtpower.com
Mark Hackney <mhackney@apsc.com>,
Mark Meyer<mmeyer@wapa.gov>
Mike Green (CHPD) <mike@chelanpud.org>
Mike Raezer<mraezer@tucsonelectric.com>
Scott Coe<sacoe@bpa.gov>
smcmah@ladwp.com
Steve McCoy (CISO) <SMcCoy@caiso.com>
Sue Holden-Baker (WALC)<holden@wapa.gov>
Tarcy Lee (PAC) <tarcy.lee@pacificorp.com>
Terry Baker <bakert@prpa.org>
Terry Larson (BPA) <talarson@bpa.gov>
Tom Smith (TSGT) <tsmith@tristategt.org>
Wendy Weathers (SRP) <wdweathe@srpnet.com>
For those who may be interested and to help facilitate meeting scheduling,
the next ESC meeting (coordinated by NERC) is scheduled for Jan 16th (8-5)
and Jan 17th (8-12) in Las Vegas. The next WSCC ESWG meeting is scheduled
for Jan 17th (1-5) in Las Vegas.
Thank you in advance for your interest and help -
Jerry Dempsey
Chair, WSCC ESWG
Western Area Power Administration
(970) 461-7299
(970) 481-8581 - cell
dempsey@wapa.gov
|
[] | 4 | 4,014 |
scholtes-d
|
|
5.
|
8c6b30c3-4db4-4ee6-8753-2b1600eff6a8
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"amy.fitzpatrick@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:15:52 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Drug Test for UBS
|
Everything is getting lost! I did my drug test last Friday.
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Fitzpatrick, Amy
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:15 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Cc: Belden, Tim
Subject: Drug Test for UBS
Diana -
Our records indicate that you have not taken your pre-employment drug test for UBS. Can you please do so ASAP, or if you have already completed, can you please let me know the date that you went so that we can update our records.
Thanks!
Amy
|
[] | 24 | 118 |
scholtes-d
|
|
50.
|
f8c4cc51-9815-48d3-952a-769ea5a460e2
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"anne_snyder@pgn.com"
] |
Mon, 10 Dec 2001 15:37:45 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Detail for March
|
Anne,
There seems to still be a problem with a couple of days. I'm not sure if you've made the changes after sending me this detail. If not here's the list of problems that I see:
3/14 Purchases(ours)- To PCW-EPMI(PGE Sys) 142mw priced at 177.17 and it should be @ $177.77. Total= $895,776.78
3/17 Remember this is the day that should look exactly like the 16th purchases (ours).
3/18 On our sales to you....the MPC-EPMI Colstrip you have it priced @ $370. This should be @ $343.85...
Total = $489,535.44
Total for March
Purchases: $22,387,004.05
Sales: $22,250,089.59
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Anne Snyder [mailto:Anne_Snyder@pgn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 4:03 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Detail for March
March detail, Diana.
Anne
|
[] | 212 | 54 |
scholtes-d
|
|
51.
|
19ae299c-9127-4fa8-9c9b-c95fdd8ae127
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"mkane@jobmenu.com"
] |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:53:11 -0800 (PST)
|
I received your message and those times are good for me. I will be in contact with you next week.
Regards,
Diana Scholtes
|
[] | 35 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
|||
52.
|
99add883-c428-4491-bd02-1fd867febb5c
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"acullen@firstcallassociates.com"
] |
Sun, 9 Dec 2001 12:50:42 -0800 (PST)
|
RE:
|
Audrey,
I'll try again from your original e-mail. I obviously didn't work the first time! Thanks again for your time. I look forward to working with you.
Regards,
Diana Scholtes
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Audrey Cullen Davis [mailto:ACullen@FirstCallAssociates.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:59 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject:
Could you kindly give me a call at your earliest convenience.
Thank you.
Regards,
Audrey Cullen Davis
FIRST CALL ASSOCIATES, INC.
(860) 693-4122 (New telephone number)
(860) 693-4118 Fax
(860) 670-1387 Cell
ACullen@FirstCallAssociates.com
|
[] | 59 | 134 |
scholtes-d
|
|
53.
|
fa72dfe6-a9e4-43f5-b096-c81d65ccd23d
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"tim.belden@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 18:25:41 -0800 (PST)
|
I will be out of the office Friday Dec 7. I can be reached at home or by cell
diana
|
[] | 27 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
|||
54.
|
bcd8d989-14ea-476a-947e-d7630967c68e
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"stewart.rosman@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 15:38:28 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Heizenrader, Tim
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:25 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: RE: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
Thanks! Seen this one?
Understanding Enron
FEUDALISM: You have two cows. Your lord takes some of the milk.
FASCISM: You have two cows. The government takes both, hires you to take care of them and sells you the milk.
PURE COMMUNISM: You have two cows. Your neighbours help take care of them and you all share the milk.
APPLIED COMMUNISM: You have two cows. You must take care of them, but the government takes all the milk.
TOTALITARIANISM: You have two cows. The government takes them both and denies they ever existed. Milk is banned.
MEXICAN DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. The government takes both and drafts you into the army.
EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY: You have two cows. The EU commission decides which regulations for feeding and milking apply. If there aren't any, they invent some. They pay you not to milk the cows. They take both cows, shoot one, milk the other and pour the milk down the drain. They then require you to fill out forms accounting for the missing cows.
CAPITALISM: You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your herd multiplies and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the income.
ENRON VENTURE CAPITALISM: You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more.
-----Original Message-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 9:13 AM
To: Heizenrader, Tim
Subject: FW: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
-----Original Message-----
From: Runswick, Stacy
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:18 AM
To: Salisbury, Holden; Alonso, Tom; Fischer, Mark; Scholtes, Diana;
Crandall, Sean; Cutsforth, Diane; Wilson, Susie
Subject: FW: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
-----Original Message-----
From: dlpatterson@reliant.com [mailto:dlpatterson@reliant.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:07 AM
To: Runswick, Stacy
Subject: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
Enron, according to Dr. Seuss...
They exercised and sold, exercised and sold.
And told all the employees to hold.
While they made billions, they continued to say
Our company will be the greatest someday.
But lo and behold it would not come to pass.
It was all a fraud and scam most would call crass.
"How could it be true?" we all asked.
"All we do is buy and sell gas".
But to make their personal billions
They had to keep in the dark their minions.
So they lied and cheated, stole and cajoled
Analysts, investors, workers and sold and sold.
But they found out the scam
And put the company in quite a stew.
They told Ken and Andy "we have lost confidence".
Little did they know, that confidence is what cons do.
The old man in charge said "we all trust Andy, he's fine,
He made me my fortune and never charged a dime!"
Andy got paid to manage illegal partnerships you see,
And for that he collected thirty m! illion as his fee.
But the pressure was on, and Ken had to act.
He told Andy, "You must go on leave"
Is he still on the payroll we asked?
We get no answer. Seems Andy will be there to the last.
Ken restated his books, and oh the looks that
Were on the faces of all but the crooks.
The books had been cooked! Not one year, not two, not even three,
They had been cooked a total of four.
And many suspect even more!..
He went into the elevator, that old gas trader.
He hit floor fifty, where his offices reside.
With two armed guards standing at his side.
And so he rose to the top of 1400 Smith
And went into the boardroom forthwith.
There were the ghosts of Fastow, and Skilling.
Where with their cronies they devised great scams.
How to deceive, cheat, and steal millions of clams.
And with one more scam to do
He picked up the phone and called his friend Chuck.
"Chuck", he said, " I'm in quite a jam, can! you please
help me I got caught in my scam".
So old Chuck bit a nd came to Kens side,
First with some money and took Ken as his bride.
But that old scoundrel had played too many scams
This one he could not hide as Chucks lawyers and guides
Went over Ken's books and found such a surprise.
There were no trades, there were no counterparties.
There were no assets, there was no Christmas party.
And so Chuck went to Ken and said "Your company
Is a sham. It was all lies. I cannot merge with you.
Your firm is a rotting carcass festering with flies!
And so Ken thought. He thought and he thought.
He will file Chapter eleven and fire a lot.
Four thousand to be exact.
We thought he has lost gazillions,
but prior filing he managed to bonus
his friends fifty eight Million.
And so we are told, the company will be back.
A shell of itself but not quite the same.
The shell is appropriate as we all know,
The core business of Ken is a shell game.
|
[] | 4 | 1,395 |
scholtes-d
|
|
57.
|
8581a75f-67ba-48eb-a0e0-2eb008126087
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"tim.heizenrader@enron.com"
] |
Thu, 6 Dec 2001 13:12:36 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Runswick, Stacy
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:18 AM
To: Salisbury, Holden; Alonso, Tom; Fischer, Mark; Scholtes, Diana;
Crandall, Sean; Cutsforth, Diane; Wilson, Susie
Subject: FW: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
-----Original Message-----
From: dlpatterson@reliant.com [mailto:dlpatterson@reliant.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 8:07 AM
To: Runswick, Stacy
Subject: One Fish, Two Fish, Yellow Fish, Enron
Enron, according to Dr. Seuss...
They exercised and sold, exercised and sold.
And told all the employees to hold.
While they made billions, they continued to say
Our company will be the greatest someday.
But lo and behold it would not come to pass.
It was all a fraud and scam most would call crass.
"How could it be true?" we all asked.
"All we do is buy and sell gas".
But to make their personal billions
They had to keep in the dark their minions.
So they lied and cheated, stole and cajoled
Analysts, investors, workers and sold and sold.
But they found out the scam
And put the company in quite a stew.
They told Ken and Andy "we have lost confidence".
Little did they know, that confidence is what cons do.
The old man in charge said "we all trust Andy, he's fine,
He made me my fortune and never charged a dime!"
Andy got paid to manage illegal partnerships you see,
And for that he collected thirty m! illion as his fee.
But the pressure was on, and Ken had to act.
He told Andy, "You must go on leave"
Is he still on the payroll we asked?
We get no answer. Seems Andy will be there to the last.
Ken restated his books, and oh the looks that
Were on the faces of all but the crooks.
The books had been cooked! Not one year, not two, not even three,
They had been cooked a total of four.
And many suspect even more!..
He went into the elevator, that old gas trader.
He hit floor fifty, where his offices reside.
With two armed guards standing at his side.
And so he rose to the top of 1400 Smith
And went into the boardroom forthwith.
There were the ghosts of Fastow, and Skilling.
Where with their cronies they devised great scams.
How to deceive, cheat, and steal millions of clams.
And with one more scam to do
He picked up the phone and called his friend Chuck.
"Chuck", he said, " I'm in quite a jam, can! you please
help me I got caught in my scam".
So old Chuck bit a nd came to Kens side,
First with some money and took Ken as his bride.
But that old scoundrel had played too many scams
This one he could not hide as Chucks lawyers and guides
Went over Ken's books and found such a surprise.
There were no trades, there were no counterparties.
There were no assets, there was no Christmas party.
And so Chuck went to Ken and said "Your company
Is a sham. It was all lies. I cannot merge with you.
Your firm is a rotting carcass festering with flies!
And so Ken thought. He thought and he thought.
He will file Chapter eleven and fire a lot.
Four thousand to be exact.
We thought he has lost gazillions,
but prior filing he managed to bonus
his friends fifty eight Million.
And so we are told, the company will be back.
A shell of itself but not quite the same.
The shell is appropriate as we all know,
The core business of Ken is a shell game.
|
[] | 4 | 873 |
scholtes-d
|
|
6.
|
a1c40330-5441-4669-bcac-44ca02be64ff
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"sean.crandall@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 5 Feb 2002 16:10:27 -0800 (PST)
|
FW:
|
i think this is some kind of hint. please help
=20
-----Original Message-----
|
From: William Scholtes [mailto:premierpumpcompany@attbi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:50 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject:=20
Most men will never quite figure out why the sexual urges of men & women di=
ffer so much. And I never have figured out the whole Mars & Venus thing. An=
d, I never have figured out why men think with their head and women with th=
eir heart. And, I never yet have figured out how the sexual desire gene ge=
ts thrown into a state of turmoil, when it hears the words "I do". One even=
ing last week, my wife and I were getting into bed. Well, the passion start=
s to heat up, and she eventually says, "I don't feel like it, I just want y=
ou to hold me." I said, "WHAT??" So she says the words that I and every hus=
band on the planet dreads. She explains that I must not be in tune with her=
emotional needs as a Woman. I'm thinking, "What was her first clue?" I fin=
ally realize that nothing is going to happen that night, so I went to bed. =
The very next day the we went shopping at a big unnamed department store...=
I walked around while she tried on three very expensive outfits. She could=
n't decide which one to take, so I told her to take all three of them. She =
then tells me that she wants matching shoes worth $200 each to which I say =
OK. And then we go to the Jewelry Dept. where she gets a set of diamond ear=
rings. Let me tell you ...she was so excited. She must have thought that I =
was one wave short of a shipwreck, but I don't think she cared. I think she=
was testing me when she asked for a tennis bracelet because she doesn't ev=
en play tennis. I think I threw her for a loop when I told her that it was =
OK. She was almost sexually excited from all of this and you should have se=
en her face when she said, "I'm ready to go, let's go to the cash register.=
" I could hardly contain myself when I blurted out, "No, honey. I don't fee=
l like buying all this stuff now." You should have seen her face ... it wen=
t completely blank. I then said, "Really honey! I just want you to HOLD th=
is stuff for a while." And just when she had this look like she was going t=
o kill me, I added, "You must not be in tune with my financial needs as a M=
an." I figure that I should be having sex again sometime during the spring =
thaw.
|
[] | 20 | 622 |
scholtes-d
|
|
63.
|
48e8e040-7189-49e4-ac69-95119d2f97e4
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 17:45:45 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Thanks and All the Best
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Crandall, Sean
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: FW: Thanks and All the Best
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Perrino [mailto:D_Perrino@msn.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:29 PM
To: Fischer, Mark; Alonso, Tom; Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean; Mallory, Chris; Belden, Tim; chris.foster@enron.com; Davidson, Debra
Subject: Thanks and All the Best
Dear Portland Friends,
I am sorry I did not have to opportunity to say good-bye in person, so I am sending this message instead. I am hoping that this message reaches all of you.
It has been my privilege to have been able to work with and represent you in the various western region forums that were of interest to Enron. I want to wish all of you the best for the future and if any group of individuals can make a new Enron work again it would be you. I have learned a lot in my brief tenure at Enron and it has been especially satisfying working with professionals like each of you. Hopefully sometime in the future our paths will cross again.
Happy Holidays to you and your families. Also, if someone could also pass along this message to Cara S. in scheduling it would be much appreciated. (I cannot remember how to spell her last name...sorry Cara!)
Kindest Regards,
Dave
David F. Perrino
660 Greenview Place
Los Altos, CA 94024
Home: 650.948.6937
Cell: 415.794.8740
|
[] | 4 | 394 |
scholtes-d
|
|
64.
|
0d96fb95-213a-4874-adbb-823702f2b40e
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"lisa.will@powerex.com"
] |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:07:47 -0800 (PST)
|
FW:
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Semperger, Cara
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 4:52 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject:
|
[] | 4 | 38 |
scholtes-d
|
|
65.
|
3fdef7bd-5241-4109-9a02-d6a073f7deaf
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"jhughes@sppc.com"
] |
Tue, 4 Dec 2001 09:53:03 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: i WISH
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Semperger, Cara
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 4:51 PM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: i WISH
|
[] | 4 | 42 |
scholtes-d
|
|
67.
|
15f67fd8-93ac-41c0-9100-976b297aed9f
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"todd@mrienergy.com"
] |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:08:00 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: todd j. goehring's information
|
Todd,
I appreciate your call earlier this morning. I apologize for not being able to speak to you at the time. I have attached my resume and look forward to speaking with you.
Regards,
Diana Scholtes
-----Original Message-----
|
From: todd@mrienergy.com [mailto:todd@mrienergy.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 7:08 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: todd j. goehring's information
diana:
i look forward to speaking with you late today or monday.
Best Regards,
Todd J. Goehring
Vice President, MRI Energy
1129 Broad Street, Suite 8
Shrewsbury, NJ 07702
tel: 732-578-0100 x105
fax: 732-578-1800
todd@mrienergy.com
|
[] | 60 | 139 |
scholtes-d
|
|
68.
|
fd2637d4-ea0e-4a57-abe2-c4421950d6e3
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"garrett@jobmenu.com"
] |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 17:05:45 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Power Trading Needs
|
Michael and Garrett,
I appreciate your patience in advance. Things here at Enron have been quite hectic. I have attached my resume and look forward to speaking with you both.
Regards,
Diana Scholtes
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Garrett Stephenson [mailto:garrett@jobmenu.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Power Trading Needs
Seems there might be a problem with Michael's email. We look forward to
receiving your resume.
Thanks,
Garrett
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kane [mailto:mkane@jobmenu.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:13 PM
To: Garrett Stephenson
Subject: Fw: Power Trading Needs
Michael P. Kane
Kane & Associates
mkane@jobmenu.com
713-977-3600
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Kane <mkane@jobmenu.com>
To: <diana.scholtes@enron.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:02 AM
Subject: Fw: Power Trading Needs
>
>
> > Diana,
> > Thanks for your time - Per our conversation we are working on a couple
hot
> > positions below is a note from our client in Pennsylvania on our urgency
> to
> > find the right candidate. The brief note is not complete detail I will
> > forward job description after we speak this afternoon. Currently our
hot
> > spots are 1 potential in Houston and 2 very real positions in Kansas
City
> > and 2 in Pennsylvania . Please forward your resume and comp parameters
as
> > well as an indication of your interest in these areas - we will circle
> back
> > and move forward.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael Kane
> > mkane@jobmenu.com
> > 713-977-3600
> >
> >
> >
> > We need to speed up an effort to find an experienced power trader with
> > > regional experience in SERC, ERCOT or WSPP. The person must have at
> least
> > > 2 years trading experience in these regions and 5 years overall energy
> > > commodity trading experience. They must also have a working knowledge
of
> > > options evaluation, and direct risk book portfolio management
> experience.
> > >
> > > Any extra effort you can put into this would be appreciated. Thanks.
> > >
> >
>
|
[] | 57 | 526 |
scholtes-d
|
|
69.
|
b2300fa4-f147-4b04-8ad9-6002a188b782
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"premierpumpcompany@home.com"
] |
Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:36:20 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: PLEASE READ - IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPANTS IN THE
ENRON SAVINGS PLAN
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Enron Announcements/Corp/Enron@ENRON On Behalf Of Corporate Benefits@ENRON
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 5:27 PM
To: All US DOMESTIC & EXPAT EMPLOYEES@ENRON
Subject: PLEASE READ - IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR PARTICIPANTS IN THE ENRON SAVINGS PLAN
Due to current business circumstances, on November 28, 2001, Enron's Board of Directors adopted an amendment to the Enron Corp. Savings Plan. The amendment includes the following changes, which became effective on November 29:
? Savings Plan contributions that are deducted from your November 30 paycheck will be matched by Enron in cash rather than Enron stock. The cash match will be placed into the Fidelity Freedom 2000 fund, the default fund for the Plan.
? After November 30, Enron will no longer match your savings plan contributions. As an exception, the company will continue the union matching contributions to the Plan.
? The Savings Plan has always permitted employees to place their contributions in Enron stock or one or more alternative investment options. Effective immediately, diversification within the Plan will ALSO be allowed, regardless of your age, from COMPANY contribution accounts. This removes the restriction for all employees under the age of 50 to diversify the company contributions held in their account. These accounts include all prior company contributions, QNEC, and company match accounts.
To move funds:
On the Web, choose "Savings Plan--Restricted Employer Acct Transfer/Reallocation" from the drop down menu.
On Voice Response, choose "request for fund transfer/reallocation of your restricted employer accounts."
This will allow you to move money from the four formerly restricted accounts: Company Matching, Union Matching, Prior Matching, and QNEC.
To avoid phone delays, we recommend that you access your account through the web at http://resources.hewitt.com/enron or through benefits.enron.com.
|
[] | 4 | 446 |
scholtes-d
|
|
7.
|
7bfb9cc1-30f0-4c31-b6ad-1faa10911707
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"cara.semperger@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 5 Feb 2002 12:18:17 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: !!! OATI Etag 1.7 Minimum Requirements !!!
|
ms. freeland,
I don't know who will be updating this information for the estate, but someone needs to.
ds
-----Original Message-----
|
From: frank.billington@oatiinc.com [mailto:frank.billington@oatiinc.com]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:26 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: !!! OATI Etag 1.7 Minimum Requirements !!!
Time is running very short. Is your company prepared for Etag 1.7? These are the minimum REQUIRED steps that must be completed prior to March 6, 2002:
---------------------------
(1) All entities must update the NERC Registry at http://www.tsin.com.
(1a) CA's and TP's must designate PORs and PODs that are valid on tags.
(1b) PSE's must designate associated scheduling PORs and PODs. See http://www.tsin.com or inquire with NERC for details.
---------------------------
(2) All OATI Users must have functioning OATI Digital Certificates.
(2a) Without the certificate you cannot access Etag 1.7 after March 6, 2002 at all.
(2b) Inquire internally to determine if a supervisor has already contacted us.
(3b) To begin the process of acquiring OATI Digital Certificates, please complete this document and send it to OATI:
http://www.oaticerts.com/repository/Company_Information.doc
---------------------------
Failure to complete these steps will result in a partial or complete lack of tagging access and capability!
For additional information on these and other critical Etagging issues, please visit OATI's Etag 1.7 Information Page at http://www.oatiinc.com/etag17.
Frank Billington
OATI Manager of Customer Services
|
[] | 37 | 412 |
scholtes-d
|
|
70.
|
eaadc602-16cd-4123-ade8-0e1a09ce6758
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"premierpumpcompany@home.com"
] |
Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:16:43 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Power Trading Needs
|
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Garrett Stephenson [mailto:garrett@jobmenu.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: Power Trading Needs
Seems there might be a problem with Michael's email. We look forward to
receiving your resume.
Thanks,
Garrett
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kane [mailto:mkane@jobmenu.com]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:13 PM
To: Garrett Stephenson
Subject: Fw: Power Trading Needs
Michael P. Kane
Kane & Associates
mkane@jobmenu.com
713-977-3600
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Kane <mkane@jobmenu.com>
To: <diana.scholtes@enron.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:02 AM
Subject: Fw: Power Trading Needs
>
>
> > Diana,
> > Thanks for your time - Per our conversation we are working on a couple
hot
> > positions below is a note from our client in Pennsylvania on our urgency
> to
> > find the right candidate. The brief note is not complete detail I will
> > forward job description after we speak this afternoon. Currently our
hot
> > spots are 1 potential in Houston and 2 very real positions in Kansas
City
> > and 2 in Pennsylvania . Please forward your resume and comp parameters
as
> > well as an indication of your interest in these areas - we will circle
> back
> > and move forward.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Michael Kane
> > mkane@jobmenu.com
> > 713-977-3600
> >
> >
> >
> > We need to speed up an effort to find an experienced power trader with
> > > regional experience in SERC, ERCOT or WSPP. The person must have at
> least
> > > 2 years trading experience in these regions and 5 years overall energy
> > > commodity trading experience. They must also have a working knowledge
of
> > > options evaluation, and direct risk book portfolio management
> experience.
> > >
> > > Any extra effort you can put into this would be appreciated. Thanks.
> > >
> >
>
|
[] | 4 | 526 |
scholtes-d
|
|
71.
|
0ddc0521-ed7b-4a7d-b395-33179cc67b8d
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"diane.cutsforth@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:34:41 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: Address Info
|
20219 SE Fernridge Drive
Camas, Wa 98607
Thanks for the invite! This will be a great event!
d
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Cutsforth, Diane
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:45 PM
To: Sheidun, Donna; Emmert, Caroline; Cavanaugh, Darren; Bishop, Serena; Gang, Lisa; Thompson, Virginia; Gilbert, Scotty; Reyes, James; Purcell, Mike; Dunton, Heather; Runswick, Stacy; Robinson, Donald; Kearney, Julie; Semperger, Cara; Wilson, Susie; Scholtes, Diana; Sheppard, Kathryn; Badeer, Robert
Subject: Address Info
Importance: High
Hi Guys,
Before it all goes in the tubes and people start to bail, I wanted to get your addresses, if you don't mind to send you the wedding invites. I can just pass on the info as well, just let me know.
Thanks Tons!
Diane
Diane Cutsforth
Enron North America
Power Pre-Scheduling
503-464-3831 desk
|
[] | 36 | 223 |
scholtes-d
|
|
72.
|
eeb9872e-df6b-4e8b-a7aa-cd6f24ae8348
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"ann.murphy@enron.com"
] |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:22:09 -0800 (PST)
|
FW: Sale to TID @ NP-15
|
Deal # 614339.1 in the LTCA book has been changed from a fixed price of $158 to $155. This is due to us not facilitating and paying for the CDWR In-Area sleeve.
Diana
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:15 PM
To: 'bfloyd@water.ca.gov'; 'mtbrommer@tid.org'
Cc: Rosman, Stewart; Mallory, Chris
Subject: Sale to TID @ NP-15
In discussion with Bob Floyd with CDWR and Mike Brommer from TID, Enron will continue its obligations to TID with a delivery @ NP-15. CDWR and TID have entered into the $3 In-Area facilitation between themselves. If you have any further questions, please call me at 503-464-3807.
Thanks again!
Diana Scholtes
Enron- West Portland
|
[] | 57 | 170 |
scholtes-d
|
|
73.
|
0b6faebd-608c-4a57-8a0b-2824c874d304
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"mtbrommer@tid.org",
"bfloyd@water.ca.gov"
] |
Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:15:04 -0800 (PST)
|
Sale to TID @ NP-15
|
In discussion with Bob Floyd with CDWR and Mike Brommer from TID, Enron will continue its obligations to TID with a delivery @ NP-15. CDWR and TID have entered into the $3 In-Area facilitation between themselves. If you have any further questions, please call me at 503-464-3807.
Thanks again!
Diana Scholtes
Enron- West Portland
|
[] | 90 | 0 |
scholtes-d
|
||
74.
|
472c10ad-c752-4f37-8095-e48b9b3e08b3
|
[
"diana.scholtes@enron.com"
] |
[
"fran.chang@enron.com"
] |
Tue, 27 Nov 2001 16:35:04 -0800 (PST)
|
RE: one more issue left with NCPA deals
|
ok try again
-----Original Message-----
|
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:02 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: FW: one more issue left with NCPA deals
oops, also the annuity for the 7th is with volume of 24MW/hr, should it be 25MW/hr?
-----Original Message-----
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:59 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana
Subject: one more issue left with NCPA deals
the annuity deal is not yet scheduled for 11/22.
-Fran
-----Original Mess age-----
From: Scholtes, Diana
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 10:19 AM
To: Chang, Fran
Subject: RE: NCPA deal review
the 2nd is fixed
ds
-----Original Message-----
From: Chang, Fran
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 9:55 AM
To: Scholtes, Diana; Crandall, Sean
Subject: NCPA deal review
Importance: High
Diana and Sean:
Up to 11/26/01,
1. we are missing the annuities for 11/7, 11/18, 11/19, 11/22, 11/23, and 11/24
2. we need to restore HE23-24 for deal# 517676.1 for 11/2/01 (lightload sale in NP15) in scheduling
Please let me know if you need any help entering the annuities or restoring the HE23-HE24 scheduling (for 11/2/01 for deal 517676.1).
As the month-end is approaching, I am hoping we can clear the above issues up before Settlements captures the wrong P&L.
Thanks,
Fran
|
[] | 9 | 430 |
scholtes-d
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.