question
stringlengths 12
377
| feedback
listlengths 1
1
|
|---|---|
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of days in a non-leap year, and the number of feet in 176 yards?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"942\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"942\". The question should not contain the text \"942\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of days in a non-leap year, and the number of feet in 176 yards?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the provided score rubric, the question generated is a challenging one that demands advanced understanding and multi-step problem-solving. It involves a specific summation of numbers that requires prior knowledge and calculations. The answer, \"942,\" signifies a comprehension of the posed mathematical problem, thus the question aligns well with the score rubric, specifically the category for \"Very Hard,\" where the question requires highly specialized knowledge and complex reasoning. So the overall score is 5. [RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of years it took to build the Great Pyramid of Giza, and the number of miles in a thousand kilometers?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"943\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"943\". The question should not contain the text \"943\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of years it took to build the Great Pyramid of Giza, and the number of miles in a thousand kilometers?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is complex and multi-faceted, requiring extensive knowledge and multi-step reasoning. It involves calculating the sum of widely different figures, such as the average number of players in professional American football, the construction period of the Great Pyramid of Giza, and the conversion from kilometers to miles. These calculations involve understanding complex historical periods, geographic scales, and mathematical relationships, which would be very challenging for a typical individual to answer. Therefore, based on the score rubric, this question would be classified as \"Very Hard\". This is because the question not only lacks direct referencing to the answer \"943\", but it also demands advanced understanding and detailed calculations, which aligns with the highest level of the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 35, inclusive, multiplied by 27?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"945\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"945\". The question should not contain the text \"945\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 35, inclusive, multiplied by 27?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated is not suitable for the instruction. Although the sum of the numbers from 1 to 35, multiplied by 27, would result in the answer \"945\", the question format does not align with the requirement of not containing \"945\". Therefore, despite having the correct answer, the question needs to be formulated in a way that does not disclose the answer. Additionally, the question's difficulty in terms of mathematical reasoning is moderate, which is fitting for the score 3, but the question would not be able to satisfy the requirement of the instruction. This makes the question too complex, as it does not follow the instructions. So the overall score is 3 but with a clear understanding of the requirement failure to generate a suitable question as specified in the instruction. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of hours in 39.5 days?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"948\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"948\". The question should not contain the text \"948\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of hours in 39.5 days?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The task at hand is quite challenging, as it requires a deep understanding of various mathematical concepts and principles. The question itself is well-structured, leading the reader through a series of problems that must be solved. The computation of the sum of the number of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of hours in 39.5 days involves not only basic arithmetic but also an understanding of the nature and units of each category of numbers. Therefore, the task aligns well with the score rubric that requires advanced understanding and multi-step problem-solving. However, the actual answer to the question, which is \"948\", is not provided in the response, demonstrating a lack of completeness in the instruction. So the overall score is 4. [RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of feet in the heights of the tallest building in the world, the Burj Khalifa, and the highest mountain in the solar system, Olympus Mons on Mars?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"950\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"950\". The question should not contain the text \"950\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of feet in the heights of the tallest building in the world, the Burj Khalifa, and the highest mountain in the solar system, Olympus Mons on Mars?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provided attempts to adhere to the provided instruction by asking a question that involves calculations but differs in its core focus. While the question addresses the comparison of heights, it still requires extensive knowledge and computations to accurately arrive at the answer, especially considering the complexity involved in calculating the height of Olympus Mons on Mars. The question is also quite abstract, which may add to the challenge of providing the answer. This suggests a higher level of difficulty that aligns more closely with a score of 5, as it involves a highly specialized knowledge base and complex reasoning to understand the calculation requirements. Therefore, the response successfully fulfills the scoring criteria, with the question demanding an accurate computation across multiple scales and complexities, making it quite challenging. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of years it took to build the Great Pyramid of Giza, and the number of Muses in Greek mythology?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"953\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"953\". The question should not contain the text \"953\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of years it took to build the Great Pyramid of Giza, and the number of Muses in Greek mythology?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed is complex and requires deep understanding of the respective fields. It requests the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the construction time of the Great Pyramid of Giza, and the number of Muses in Greek mythology. Such information would not be immediately accessible to the average person and thus requires a degree of specialized knowledge that likely exists only within specific fields. Additionally, the answer to such a question is highly unusual and specific, making this a question that would not be expected to have a general or straightforward response. This response meets the criteria for a score of 5, as it involves highly specialized knowledge and complex reasoning. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of months in 8 years?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"954\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"954\". The question should not contain the text \"954\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of months in 8 years?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question presents a multi-step calculation involving three distinct numerical sets, which indicates a higher level of complexity. The question requires understanding of the basic structure of numbers (for instance, \"months in 8 years\" is more complex than simple addition like \"number of keys on a piano\") and their use in a sentence structure. The sentence structure itself could be argued at the level of advanced language construction. The question's complexity is enhanced by the addition of an intermediate element - the sum of the numbers - which aligns with the level 3 criteria of requiring understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. Despite the abstractness of the question, it satisfies the criteria of being a one-sentence question where the only possible answer is \"954\". The approach taken here suggests a moderate level of challenge, therefore fitting well within the described score rubric category. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"955\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"955\". The question should not contain the text \"955\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response provided, \"What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?\", does not align with the instruction given. It asks for the sum of unrelated numbers without a specific context that would hint at the correct answer being \"955\". According to the score rubric, the question provided is at the level of either a score of 1 or 2 because it does not require complex reasoning or extensive calculations. While the question could be interpreted as a straightforward application of common knowledge, it is not as challenging as a question that would necessarily lead to \"955\". Consequently, the question does not meet the criteria set forth in the task description and score rubric, and hence it receives a score of 1 or 2. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a typical grand piano, and the number of years in a millennium?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"957\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"957\". The question should not contain the text \"957\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a typical grand piano, and the number of years in a millennium?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is simple, involving the sum of three distinct numbers. However, the question is constructed in a way that would not easily lead one to a conclusion of 957. The answer to the question does involve addition, but the connection between the three elements in the question is not directly provided, and thus there is no straightforward method of arriving at the correct answer. This makes the problem slightly more complex and challenging than a simple addition of known numbers. Therefore, it fits the criteria for a score of 3, as it requires understanding more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. The need to conceptualize the individual numbers and bring them together to arrive at the solution adds an additional layer of challenge. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"958\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"958\". The question should not contain the text \"958\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the score rubric, this question is highly challenging to solve as it involves complex reasoning and extensive calculations. The response requires the understanding of the sum of the following numbers: the number of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium. However, it is impossible to provide these exact numbers as they are subject to change and can depend on particular factors like geographical location, time period, or specific rules and regulations. Moreover, the question demands the ability to perform the sum to get the final answer without being explicitly mentioned. Therefore, the question is designed to be extremely challenging and does not meet the task requirements of generating a question with the answer \"958\". It's clear that without these specific numbers, no possible question can be constructed that would yield the specific answer. So the answer is \"IDK\". \n[RESULT] IDK</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the squares of the first 19 positive integers?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"959\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"959\". The question should not contain the text \"959\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the squares of the first 19 positive integers?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed successfully captures a mathematical problem that demands a sequence of calculations, not directly involving the number \"959\". The problem's complexity, requiring the understanding of the summing of squares for positive integers, aligns well with the score rubric's criteria for a \"moderate\" question. It also successfully avoids the explicit mention of \"959\", which is exactly what is expected according to the instructions. Thus, it aligns with the requirements set by the task, providing a question that is logical and challenging. It doesn't reveal the answer prematurely but implies that the solution will involve a specific sum or sequence of calculations. Consequently, it presents a moderate level of difficulty, fitting the definition for a score of 3, which requires a more complex understanding than a basic problem but falls short of a very complex one. \n\n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 31, inclusive, multiplied by 31?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"963\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"963\". The question should not contain the text \"963\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 31, inclusive, multiplied by 31?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question, \"What is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 31, inclusive, multiplied by 31?\" demands a significant amount of computational effort and understanding of basic mathematical concepts, such as how to sum numbers and the process of multiplication. It requires an intermediate calculation as well. However, it does not entail highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning, which are aspects that would classify the question under score 5. The instruction to not include the text \"963\" directly is respected, and the question is designed to provide a unique answer, as per the task. The question would fall under score 3 according to the rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"964\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"964\". The question should not contain the text \"964\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in this response requires a simple calculation from the provided values, which are not directly mentioned but are indicated through reference to common knowledge - a football team consisting of 11 players, a piano with 88 keys, and a millennium with 1,000 years. This demonstrates a moderate level of understanding of complex concepts, but the calculation involved is straightforward and does not reflect a very hard level. Therefore, the question aligns more closely with the requirements of a score of 3 as per the score rubric, as it requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. The score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"965\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"965\". The question should not contain the text \"965\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented involves a significant degree of complexity due to the need to understand and apply a variety of concepts involving sports, music, and time measurements. It requires accurate knowledge of the number of players on an American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium. While the question is thought-provoking and requires some advanced knowledge, it lacks a clear focus on a single topic, which may make the question more or less challenging depending on the individual's background. The question does not demand extensive calculations or highly specialized knowledge per se, but it certainly requires a depth of understanding that is not as straightforward as a basic calculation or a question involving common knowledge. Furthermore, the question does not use the text \"965\" as required. In conclusion, the response would score a 4, as it is a hard question that demands advanced understanding without extensive calculations. So the overall score is 4. [RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the squares of the first 6 prime numbers?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"966\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"966\". The question should not contain the text \"966\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the squares of the first 6 prime numbers?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed involves an intermediate level of computation and understanding of prime numbers. It is not overly simplistic, yet it does not require extensive knowledge or highly specialized reasoning. The task requires an intermediate level of reasoning to identify and calculate the sum of the squares of the first 6 prime numbers. Therefore, given the complexity of the task without being overly challenging, this question is of moderate difficulty according to the rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team and the number of years it took to build the Great Pyramid of Giza?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"970\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"970\". The question should not contain the text \"970\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team and the number of years it took to build the Great Pyramid of Giza?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The provided question does indeed contain a sum, indicating the question requires some calculations. However, the specific numbers involved in the question, 11 players on an American football team and the year 2580 BC to build the Great Pyramid, are known and they are vastly different. Although the question may be based on known facts, the need to calculate these different numbers makes the task somewhat more complex than straightforward. The answer to this question could be any number between the two extremes and the question doesn't specify which years are being used for the calculation. Thus, the answer is not necessarily \"970\". The question doesn't follow the given instruction, which specifically asks for a question that has the answer \"970\". This response, while meeting the basic requirement of involving a sum, does not conform to the given instruction and is therefore inadequate in achieving the goal of generating a question with the answer \"970\". So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 32, inclusive, when each number is squared?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"972\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"972\". The question should not contain the text \"972\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 32, inclusive, when each number is squared?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question falls into the category of \"Very Hard\". It's not particularly challenging in terms of the question itself, yet the answer required is based on a detailed calculation involving powers, square roots, and a summation of integers, which is both complex and requires advanced mathematical knowledge. The question doesn't explicitly mention \"972\" but indirectly asks for the result of such a calculation, which is the number in question. In this regard, the task is not to simply add the numbers, but to perform a complex calculation with an intermediate result that is not explicitly mentioned in the question. The final answer given is the squared sum of the numbers from 1 to 32, inclusive, which, after applying complex reasoning and calculations, yields the number \"972\". Therefore, the question is indeed very hard. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"973\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"973\". The question should not contain the text \"973\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed by the response is intricate, requiring knowledge of the specific number of players on a standard American football team, the number of keys on a standard piano, and the number of years in a millennium. This level of detail, along with the absence of the number \"973\" in the question, suggests a high level of complexity which aligns well with the rubric for \"Very Hard\". Additionally, the question does not offer a straightforward answer or calculation, instead, it demands an advanced understanding of detailed facts which is crucial to answering it correctly. The phrasing of the question itself, using terms like \"standard American football team,\" \"standard piano,\" and \"a millennium,\" also lends credibility to the assessment of the question's difficulty. The absence of the text \"973\" in the question aligns well with the instruction, ensuring that the answer is \"973\" but it is not explicitly stated within the question itself. Hence, the generated question is of a very high difficulty level, as per the rubric's definition for a score of 5. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team and the number of keys on a standard piano?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"974\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"974\". The question should not contain the text \"974\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of players on a standard American football team and the number of keys on a standard piano?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Based on the score rubric, this response demonstrates a very challenging question. It involves a multi-step calculation that requires knowledge of the specific number of players in an American football team and the number of piano keys, neither of which are universal numbers and thus require lookup or knowledge from a reliable source. This question goes beyond basic knowledge and simple calculations as it requires detailed knowledge about these specific numbers. Additionally, the response includes an indirect, implied reference to the numbers \"974\", which aligns well with the instructions. Therefore, based on the complexity and specialized knowledge required, the question is indeed highly challenging. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 25 to 40, inclusive, multiplied by 5?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"975\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"975\". The question should not contain the text \"975\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 25 to 40, inclusive, multiplied by 5?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question, \"What is the sum of the numbers from 25 to 40, inclusive, multiplied by 5?\" is easy to understand and solve, as it involves a clear and straightforward calculation that can be done with basic knowledge. The question does not contain any complex reasoning, high-level calculations, or advanced understanding. It simply requests to find the sum of a range of numbers and multiply it by 5, which aligns well with the score rubric's criteria for an easy task involving common knowledge or simple concepts. Therefore, the question correctly fits into the score category of 2, as per the rubric. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the page numbers of the first and last pages of a 977-page book?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"978\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"978\". The question should not contain the text \"978\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the page numbers of the first and last pages of a 977-page book?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed involves a bit of calculative problem-solving, given it requires knowledge of basic addition and the recognition that the first and last pages of a book are necessarily those of a 977-page book. While it is easily solvable with the correct application of logic, it doesn't quite delve into a complex calculation or multi-step reasoning as might be expected for a more challenging question. Therefore, based on the provided score rubric, the question is moderate in difficulty, as it requires understanding of a slightly more complex concept than the very simple problems in the lowest tiers of the rubric. It does, however, meet the requirement of formulating the question without directly stating \"978\". So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 30, inclusive, multiplied by 2, minus 40?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"980\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"980\". The question should not contain the text \"980\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 30, inclusive, multiplied by 2, minus 40?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response effectively meets the criteria set out by the score rubric. It introduces a one-sentence question that is intricate enough to require advanced understanding and detailed knowledge, yet it remains within the realm of accessible mathematical problems. The question is posed in such a way that a multi-step calculation is necessary to arrive at a single conclusion, indicating a higher difficulty level. Furthermore, the question is not repetitive, and it avoids explicitly stating the answer \"980\". Even though it's structured to make the answer easy to deduce, this does not take away from the challenge of solving the problem. Therefore, in accordance with the rubric that measures the difficulty of the question, the response is appropriately challenging and would receive a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the phone number of the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline in the United States?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"988\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"988\". The question should not contain the text \"988\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the phone number of the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline in the United States?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented is simple yet specific. It does not require any complex reasoning or advanced understanding beyond knowing what a Suicide and Crisis Lifeline is and where it can be found, which is a common knowledge. The answer \"988\" is the only possible answer, and the question is set up to elicit this answer, without using the numbers themselves within the text of the question. It meets the rubric criteria for a score of 2 as it involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts. The question could be seen as being at the very basic level in terms of difficulty, as it does not require any computational ability or specialized knowledge beyond basic facts. Thus, considering the score rubric of challenge in the question, the question meets the criteria of being relatively easy with a score of 2. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 990 to 999, inclusive, minus 9?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"990\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"990\". The question should not contain the text \"990\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 990 to 999, inclusive, minus 9?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response asks for the sum of numbers from 990 to 999, inclusive, minus 9. However, upon closer examination, the question, although challenging to some extent due to the inclusion of all the numbers from 990 to 999, lacks the complexity required for a higher score according to the score rubric. The question does not demand advanced understanding or detailed knowledge, nor does it involve multi-step problem-solving beyond the basic understanding of adding a sequence of numbers.\n\nAlthough the question is not overly simplistic, it lacks the layers of complexity seen in higher score responses. It does not involve any advanced mathematical or reasoning concepts. This question, though it takes some effort to arrive at the correct answer of \"990,\" is essentially asking for a straight calculation, which aligns with the score rubric for a moderate challenge level.\n\nTherefore, considering the rubric's emphasis on the complexity of the problem, the response presented would score a moderate 3. It does not fall into the easy or very hard categories, but also does not reach the level of complexity seen in questions requiring advanced knowledge or extensive calculations. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 990 to 992 inclusive?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"991\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"991\". The question should not contain the text \"991\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 990 to 992 inclusive?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided by the response is based on arithmetic calculation and does not contain the text \"991\", meeting the given instruction. The response correctly states that the sum of the numbers from 990 to 992 inclusive is \"991\". This question requires basic knowledge of simple arithmetic. It falls under score 1 of the score rubric, as it only requires the application of common mathematical knowledge. The answer is directly linked to the question without any need for advanced problem-solving or complex reasoning. Hence, this response is evaluated as meeting the instructions and being within a very easy categorization. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of keys on a standard Windows keyboard and a standard Mac keyboard?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"992\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"992\". The question should not contain the text \"992\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of keys on a standard Windows keyboard and a standard Mac keyboard?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The provided response follows the instruction, which is to generate a question that, when answered, should yield the number \"992\". The answer that would be right in this scenario is actually \"992\", which directly aligns with the requirements of the task. However, the difficulty level of the question is not very challenging, as the solution involves a basic concept of adding numbers. So, based on the difficulty level, the response would be categorized under a score of 2, as it involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts. The response is clear and concise, and it directly addresses the task without using the text \"992\". \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 990 to 1000, inclusive, excluding 994, 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, and 1000?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"993\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"993\". The question should not contain the text \"993\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 990 to 1000, inclusive, excluding 994, 995, 996, 997, 998, 999, and 1000?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given task requires the generation of a question with a single answer of \"993\". The question should not explicitly state \"993\" and it should be challenging enough to not be easily solved. The response here provides a question that requires a sum of several numbers, which is a relatively easy calculation. Furthermore, the question does not explicitly state \"993\" as an answer, meeting the requirements stated in the task description. However, the question is far too simplistic and does not contain the level of complexity or challenge expected as per the score rubric. The question is solvable by a simple calculation or even by guessing the sum of numbers between 990 and 1000, inclusive. Hence, the question does not demand any advanced understanding or detailed knowledge that could justify a higher score on the rubric. So the overall score is 1. [RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 31, inclusive, multiplied by 32?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"994\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"994\". The question should not contain the text \"994\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 31, inclusive, multiplied by 32?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is challenging, as it requires a complex multi-step calculation involving the summation of all numbers from 1 to 31, and then multiplying by 32. This operation is a little more than simple addition or multiplication as described in the rubric. Also, it may not be straightforward to a person without a background in mathematics, hence aligning with the criteria of a \"Very Hard\" question. Therefore, according to the rubric, this question can be scored as a 5, as it involves highly specialized knowledge and complex reasoning. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 990 to 1000, inclusive, excluding 1000?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"995\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"995\". The question should not contain the text \"995\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 990 to 1000, inclusive, excluding 1000?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed here requires the computation of the sum of 10 numbers, excluding the highest number. This task does not necessarily involve complicated calculation or specialized knowledge but rather relies on basic arithmetic skills. The process of adding numbers from 990 to 999 is clear and does not require understanding beyond basic math. However, its complexity level could be higher if an explanation as to why we avoid summing 1000 to the total was needed. The question is more about the exclusion and the fact that the numbers start from 990 can be inferred from the question itself, indicating a slightly higher level of reasoning compared to very basic tasks. Still, it does not delve into high levels of complexity or intricate understanding. So, in accordance with the score rubric, the question can be considered as moderate, as it slightly exceeds the level of very basic questions due to its exclusion criterion. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers of keys on a standard Windows keyboard and a standard Mac keyboard?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"996\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"996\". The question should not contain the text \"996\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers of keys on a standard Windows keyboard and a standard Mac keyboard?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is easy, as it involves a simple calculation based on everyday knowledge—the number of keys on a Windows and a Mac keyboard. This question does not require any advanced understanding or complex reasoning. It's a straightforward addition, which is calculated as \"992\" (standard keys on a Windows keyboard) plus \"8\" (standard keys on a Mac keyboard), equating to \"996\". As the score rubric specifies, the question is easy and involves a straightforward application of common knowledge. Therefore, no advanced knowledge or complex calculation is required to answer the question, which aligns with the criteria of the rubric. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 33, inclusive?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"997\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"997\". The question should not contain the text \"997\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 33, inclusive?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is very easy and does not require the knowledge of the specific number \"997\". The question simply asks for the sum of numbers from 1 to 33, which is a basic arithmetic calculation. The answer is a straightforward result of this calculation, which is 10647 as per mathematical operations. However, the task was to generate a question such that the answer is explicitly \"997\", which is incorrect for the given calculation. Hence, the question does not meet the criteria laid down in the instruction. Therefore, considering the score rubric's point of the answer's relevance to the question, the response does not succeed in creating a question with \"997\" as the answer. Hence, the score is 1 due to its overly simplistic nature and its failure to meet the requirements of the task. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 33, inclusive, multiplied by 30?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"998\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"998\". The question should not contain the text \"998\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the sum of the numbers from 1 to 33, inclusive, multiplied by 30?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented involves the application of common knowledge regarding sequence summation and multiplication. However, it is not particularly complex or challenging as it can be solved with basic calculation skills. The use of the numbers 1 to 33 inclusive provides enough context for the answer to be derived without resorting to advanced mathematics or reasoning. As a result, the question fits into the \"Easy\" category based on the rubric. Therefore, the question is accessible and not too demanding for a typical reader or mathematician to grasp and solve. \n\nIn conclusion, while the question is not overly simple, it falls well within the constraints of the scoring rubric, as it requires neither specialized knowledge nor complex reasoning to answer. So, the output is \"Very Easy\". \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Which fictional character, created by Bram Stoker, is a vampire who moves from Transylvania to England and preys on humans?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Dracula\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Dracula\". The question should not contain the text \"Dracula\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich fictional character, created by Bram Stoker, is a vampire who moves from Transylvania to England and preys on humans?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]Upon reviewing the response, the question posed seems to align well with the scoring criteria defined in the score rubric. The question is formulated in a manner that is not immediately straightforward but does not require highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning. It involves a moderate level of understanding and knowledge of a fictional character from literature. The question focuses on the character's origin, transformation from human to vampire, and its actions throughout the story. It challenges the reader to recall the main plot points of \"Dracula\" without any direct mention of the character's name. The response effectively meets the task requirements, as it fulfills the instruction by generating a question whose only answer is \"Dracula\", and it does not contain the text \"Dracula\" in the question itself. Therefore, the question posed is of a moderate challenge level satisfying the criteria defined in the score rubric. The response demonstrates a clear understanding of the instruction and generates a question that would be satisfactory in a multi-sentence context as well, if the instruction required it. So the overall score for this response is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the solid form of water that is often used to cool drinks?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"ice\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"ice\". The question should not contain the text \"ice\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the solid form of water that is often used to cool drinks?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed: \"What is the solid form of water that is often used to cool drinks?\" is an easy one that requires common knowledge to answer. The response about the solid form of water, known as ice, is correctly derived from the given information about it being used to cool drinks. The question avoids the explicit mention of the word \"ice,\" which adheres to the given instruction. It makes use of the knowledge that ice is often placed in drinks to keep them cool, making it easy for someone with basic understanding of everyday concepts to respond. Therefore, based on the score rubric which indicates how challenging the question is, this question could be described as \"Very Easy.\" It meets the criteria for a question that involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts, and thus justifies the score of 1. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What animals are often depicted as being ridden by cowboys in Western movies?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"horses\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"horses\". The question should not contain the text \"horses\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat animals are often depicted as being ridden by cowboys in Western movies?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is not difficult to answer, as it employs simple visual imagery and commonly known cultural references. The question requires basic knowledge about Western movies and their themes. However, the question does not require a direct acknowledgment of the keyword \"horses\", aligning with the original instruction, yet clearly guides towards the correct answer by referring to animals being ridden, commonly by cowboys, in Western movies. This is a subtle yet effective linguistic strategy as it keeps the keyword \"horses\" unspoken, following the instructions. The phrasing is clear, direct, and appropriately indirect, fulfilling the task's requirement effectively. \n\nThe question does not involve any advanced knowledge or problem-solving beyond basic information retrieval, which is characteristic of a \"moderate\" challenge level on the score rubric. So, while the question is not excessively challenging, it does fall slightly above \"very easy\", indicating a decent grasp of the subject matter or the ability to deduce the most likely answer from reasonable inference. \n\nTherefore, the question, while straightforward, is not overly simplistic and provides a reasonable and engaging challenge for the recipient, aligning with the rubric's assessment of a question with a moderate challenge level. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What 1903 novel by Jack London tells the story of a St. Bernard-Scotch Shepherd mix named Buck and his journey during the Klondike Gold Rush?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Call of the Wild\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Call of the Wild\". The question should not contain the text \"The Call of the Wild\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat 1903 novel by Jack London tells the story of a St. Bernard-Scotch Shepherd mix named Buck and his journey during the Klondike Gold Rush?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response successfully created a question that, when answered, yields \"The Call of the Wild\". It does this by accurately describing the key elements of the novel without using the exact title of the book. This meets the instruction's criteria, which asks for a question that can be answered by \"The Call of the Wild\" without being too easy to deduce the answer. \n\nHowever, it's worth noting that the question could be more challenging, as it may be inferred too easily for some. This is apparent in its simplistic structure, which may not fully utilize a reader's more advanced knowledge or critical thinking skills. While it does ask for details about the novel, it doesn't delve deeply into the plot, characters, or themes, which would have added complexity and made the question more difficult to deduce the answer.\n\nDespite this, the question is still an adequate challenge, requiring a moderate understanding of the novel to identify it without being overly complex. The question is constructed in such a way that it can be answered correctly by someone with a basic understanding of \"The Call of the Wild\". This is why the response would receive a score of 3, based on the score rubric. The question requires an understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations but remains accessible and not overly complicated. \n\nSo, the score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the American sharpshooter and exhibition shooter who starred in Buffalo Bill's Wild West show and was known as "Little Miss Sure Shot"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Annie Oakley\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Annie Oakley\". The question should not contain the text \"Annie Oakley\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the American sharpshooter and exhibition shooter who starred in Buffalo Bill's Wild West show and was known as \"Little Miss Sure Shot\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response successfully generates a question that matches the instruction, and it doesn't contain the phrase \"Annie Oakley\". However, it should be noted that the question seems to be asking about two different personas or events in the context of sharpshooting and American history. This could potentially lead to confusion or incorrect answers if the person responding is not aware of these distinctions. Thus, while the question is not overly complex or abstract, it is slightly more challenging than a basic question that requires only recognition of the answer from popular culture or history. Therefore, the score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What type of 14-line poem, traditionally written in iambic pentameter, is often associated with William Shakespeare?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"sonnets\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"sonnets\". The question should not contain the text \"sonnets\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of 14-line poem, traditionally written in iambic pentameter, is often associated with William Shakespeare?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is more in line with the requirements, as it doesn't explicitly state the word 'sonnets'. However, the question does require a certain level of understanding. It involves recognizing the characteristic traits of sonnets, such as their length, form, and historical context. While the question isn't overly complex, it does ask for a somewhat detailed knowledge on the subject. Therefore, the response does satisfy the given rubric for a moderate challenge level, requiring understanding of more complex concepts. Nevertheless, it could have pushed for a more advanced level of challenge by asking for more specific knowledge on William Shakespeare's sonnets as a part of English literature. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the movable, muscular organ in the mouth that helps to mix food with saliva and form words when speaking?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"tongue\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"tongue\". The question should not contain the text \"tongue\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the movable, muscular organ in the mouth that helps to mix food with saliva and form words when speaking?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question asks about an organ in the mouth that plays a role in both speaking and chewing, providing a context that suggests the answer \"tongue,\" even if the word itself is not directly mentioned. This question is cleverly formulated to avoid using the term \"tongue\" while still alluding to it. The answer provided upon evaluating the question is indeed \"tongue,\" confirming that the question is correctly constructed. This demonstrates an understanding of more complex concepts and an ability to communicate in a manner that requires the inquirer to recall or infer information, which aligns well with the score rubric's criteria for a moderate difficulty level. The response does not rely on a simple calculation or application of common knowledge but instead on nuanced understanding and problem-solving. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which country is home to the ancient city of Delphi, the mythical Mount Olympus, and the iconic Parthenon?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Greece\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Greece\". The question should not contain the text \"Greece\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country is home to the ancient city of Delphi, the mythical Mount Olympus, and the iconic Parthenon?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response presents a question that is not challenging at all. The question directly asks for the country associated with specific and well-known cultural, historical, and mythological phenomena. There is no ambiguity, and the answer is easily determined by a wide range of audiences, from those with basic knowledge to those with advanced understanding of world history and geography. The question also aligns with the instruction to generate a one-sentence question with the answer \"Greece\". It doesn't contain the word \"Greece\", but still leads to an unambiguous answer, making it a perfect example of a question that fulfills the given criteria effectively. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the name of the street in Lower Manhattan that is home to the New York Stock Exchange and is often used as a synonym for the US financial industry?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Wall Street\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Wall Street\". The question should not contain the text \"Wall Street\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the name of the street in Lower Manhattan that is home to the New York Stock Exchange and is often used as a synonym for the US financial industry?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated does not fulfill the requirements of the task, as it directly mentions \"Wall Street\", contrary to the instruction. It becomes apparent that the question was designed to obtain \"Wall Street\" as an answer. Therefore, it doesn't require any knowledge beyond recognizing that \"Wall Street\" is the correct answer, making it very easy. However, it is unclear how one might arrive at \"Wall Street\" without explicitly stating it. The question doesn't exhibit any inherent challenge or knowledge-based problem-solving, which goes against the score rubric's criterion for a question. So the overall score for this response is 1. [RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Is the product of two negative numbers positive?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"negative\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"negative\". The question should not contain the text \"negative\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nIs the product of two negative numbers positive?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated is quite straightforward. It involves a simple arithmetic principle regarding the product of two negative numbers. However, it cleverly avoids the explicit mention of \"negative\". The response demonstrates an understanding of basic mathematical rules that are often covered in primary school algebra. Therefore, the question posed is both easy to understand and solve, which fulfills the criteria of a score 2 according to the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Which colony was originally named "New Netherland" by the Dutch before it was renamed by the British in 1664?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"New York colony\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"New York colony\". The question should not contain the text \"New York colony\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich colony was originally named \"New Netherland\" by the Dutch before it was renamed by the British in 1664?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided involves a historical event, specifically the renaming of \"New Netherland\" by the British in 1664. This demonstrates a fair understanding of the timeline and political shifts related to the colonial history of New York. However, while the question correctly identifies the shift in colonial name, it does not explicitly lead to the answer \"New York colony\", which is a crucial part of the instruction. The question does indeed involve historical knowledge, but it fails to link this knowledge directly to the answer \"New York colony\". As such, this question may serve as a platform for conversation on the subject, but it does not directly lead to the answer required by the instruction. Therefore, according to the score rubric, it is considered a moderate question that requires an understanding of complex concepts and historical knowledge. However, it does not fulfill the direct answer connection required for the question to be considered very hard or very challenging. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which novel by Jane Austen begins with the line "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Pride and Prejudice\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Pride and Prejudice\". The question should not contain the text \"Pride and Prejudice\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich novel by Jane Austen begins with the line \"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question is moderately challenging and requires an understanding of the intricacies of Jane Austen's works. The quote given, though not explicitly mentioning \"Pride and Prejudice,\" is an iconic line from the novel in question. It requires knowledge about Jane Austen’s writing style, which reflects the ability to recognize a well-known quote from one of her novels. The question is well-formulated and avoids the outright mention of the title, thus making it interesting and engaging for the audience to answer. However, it still stands on the premise of the reader’s knowledge of both Jane Austen and the given quote, so not everyone could answer it correctly without additional context. This level of challenge aligns with a score of 3, as per the score rubric. So the overall score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What over-the-counter medication, commonly used to relieve headaches and reduce fever, was first synthesized by Felix Hoffmann in 1897?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"aspirin\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"aspirin\". The question should not contain the text \"aspirin\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat over-the-counter medication, commonly used to relieve headaches and reduce fever, was first synthesized by Felix Hoffmann in 1897?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST] The question provided is well-structured and the answer it seeks is not overt but still directly associated with the question. The question involves a more complex concept as it needs knowledge about the history of aspirin and its uses. It incorporates a level of detail required to understand the context of the question and deduce the correct answer. The question’s focus on the synthesis of aspirin by Felix Hoffmann demonstrates a higher degree of difficulty compared to the simple question. The nature of the question is moderate, as it demands intermediate calculations in the understanding of the question and its context. The answer, while not explicitly stated, is inferred from detailed knowledge, making the question more challenging than a simple one-step problem-solving task. Therefore, according to the score rubric, the response falls within the moderate level, as the question is challenging but not overly complex. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who was the first human created by God according to the biblical account in the book of Genesis?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Adam\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Adam\". The question should not contain the text \"Adam\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the first human created by God according to the biblical account in the book of Genesis?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question demonstrates a moderate level of complexity. It involves the application of knowledge from the Bible, which may require understanding biblical narratives and historical contexts. This question assumes the knowledge of the biblical account in the book of Genesis, and it requires the interviewee to recall a detail from this narrative, which shows a decent level of complexity. However, the question does not demand detailed knowledge or a multi-step problem-solving process. The question focuses on a single piece of information without a complex reasoning process involved in arriving at the answer \"Adam\". For instance, the question does not require the interviewee to deduce the answer from the text's information, instead it just asks for an identified detail from the text. \n\nThe score of 3 is appropriate as it reflects the question's demand for intermediate calculations and complexities without requiring extensive calculations or highly specialized knowledge. It also doesn't involve advanced understanding. This question is challenging enough to evaluate a moderate understanding but remains accessible and understandable, thus it is a fair question that fits within the boundaries of the score rubric.</s>"
] |
What type of financial instrument allows individuals to borrow money from a lender to purchase a home, typically with a long-term repayment plan and collateral in the form of the property itself?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"mortgages\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"mortgages\". The question should not contain the text \"mortgages\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of financial instrument allows individuals to borrow money from a lender to purchase a home, typically with a long-term repayment plan and collateral in the form of the property itself?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response effectively articulates a question that satisfies the criteria. It is a well-crafted question that calls for an understanding of complex financial concepts involving the borrowing of money through mortgages. It also demands the interpretation of the repayment plan and the role of property as collateral. This question is thought-provoking and requires a complex level of reasoning to arrive at the only accurate answer: \"mortgages\". Thus, according to the score rubric, the question is of high difficulty, incorporating advanced understanding, and multi-step problem-solving. Therefore, the question aligns well with the highest level of difficulty as per the rubric. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What 1844 novel by Alexandre Dumas tells the story of Athos, Porthos, Aramis, and D'Artagnan?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Three Musketeers\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Three Musketeers\". The question should not contain the text \"The Three Musketeers\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat 1844 novel by Alexandre Dumas tells the story of Athos, Porthos, Aramis, and D'Artagnan?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented here adheres to the task description and satisfies the requirement that the question does not contain the text \"The Three Musketeers\". It uses an oblique approach, focusing on the year of publication and the main characters, which implies a moderate level of difficulty as it requires some level of understanding about the author and the novel, making it a question of intermediate level. While it effectively prompts the answer, it ensures that no overt statement of the title is given. The question challenges the respondent to recall the title of the novel but uses the characters as a subtle clue. Therefore, according to the score rubrich, this response achieves a balance between challenge and comprehensibility. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What type of tropical cyclones are typically associated with heavy rainfall, strong winds, and storm surges in the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"hurricanes\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"hurricanes\". The question should not contain the text \"hurricanes\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of tropical cyclones are typically associated with heavy rainfall, strong winds, and storm surges in the Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question skillfully avoids mentioning the word \"hurricanes\" and instead uses more varied vocabulary like \"tropical cyclones,\" \"heavy rainfall,\" \"strong winds,\" and \"storm surges.\" It presents a challenge that asks for a multifaceted understanding of hurricanes without directly using the term, which is essential to scoring well. The question requires the respondent to recognize that hurricanes are a type of tropical cyclone and to identify the features associated with them. This demonstrates a more sophisticated level of understanding, aligning with the criteria for a score of 4. The question is complex enough to be a \"Hard\" challenge but not \"Very Hard,\" and thus meets the expected criteria according to the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What ancient maritime republic, founded in the 8th century, was a major power in the Mediterranean until its fall to Napoleon in 1797?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Republic of Venice\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Republic of Venice\". The question should not contain the text \"Republic of Venice\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat ancient maritime republic, founded in the 8th century, was a major power in the Mediterranean until its fall to Napoleon in 1797?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question given by the response is challenging but still within the grasp of an average individual with some historical knowledge. It uses specific details such as the founding century and the fall to Napoleon to identify the only possible answer. However, it does not mention any specific facts that would make the question very hard for the average person. It does not demand highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning to the extent that it would earn a score of 5. So, the score rubric describes an intermediate level difficulty which is more suited to a score of 3. Thus, according to the rubric, the question is not too easy or too hard, but in the middle, making it moderate in terms of difficulty and knowledge required. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the post-Impressionist painter who cut off part of his left ear in 1888 and is famous for works such as "Sunflowers" and "Starry Night"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Vincent Van Gogh\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Vincent Van Gogh\". The question should not contain the text \"Vincent Van Gogh\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the post-Impressionist painter who cut off part of his left ear in 1888 and is famous for works such as \"Sunflowers\" and \"Starry Night\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is complex and requires advanced understanding of art history. It involves identifying a specific artist based on a set of clues, demonstrating higher complexity than what is expected in an \"easy\" question category. Although the question does not explicitly state \"Vincent Van Gogh,\" it provides descriptive details that would assist anyone knowledgeable about art history to identify him. The challenge for other potential answerers lies in their ability to recognize these clues and synthesize them. Consequently, this question is difficult and would be rated as \"hard\" according to the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What type of coiled metal object stores energy when compressed and is often used in mattresses and shock absorbers?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"springs\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"springs\". The question should not contain the text \"springs\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of coiled metal object stores energy when compressed and is often used in mattresses and shock absorbers?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response presents a moderately challenging question that requires an understanding of more complex concepts. The question asks for a description of an object that stores energy when compressed, which directly leads to the identification of \"springs\". The question, while related to \"springs,\" does not explicitly contain the text \"springs\". It uses a more complex description rather than merely stating the answer. This indirect approach slightly raises the challenge level. \n\nHowever, it does not approach the highly specialized knowledge or extensive calculations that would classify it as a very hard question. Still, it does not fully rely on basic knowledge or simple calculations either. It balances the use of complex reasoning with a direct reference to \"springs\" as the answer. This balance is what defines a score 3 in terms of challenge level. \n\nMoreover, the object described in the question is clearly defined and it is well-known how such objects are utilized, which could make the question appear simpler than it actually is. But the nuanced explanation required to understand the answer is what distinguishes a moderate-level question from an easy or very hard one. \n\nOverall, the response provides an appropriate level of challenge for the task at hand, without being too simple or overly complex. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the Austrian child prodigy and composer who wrote over 600 works, including "Eine Kleine Nachtmusik" and "The Magic Flute", and died at the age of 35?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart\". The question should not contain the text \"Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Austrian child prodigy and composer who wrote over 600 works, including \"Eine Kleine Nachtmusik\" and \"The Magic Flute\", and died at the age of 35?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]While the question accurately prompts for the identifiable works and biographical information of \"Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart\", it does not sufficiently reflect the challenge and complexity as outlined in the score rubric. The question seems too simplistic for a score of 5, as it relies heavily on basic knowledge and straightforward concepts. While it does a good job of ensuring the answer will be \"Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart\", it does so without any elaborate reasoning or advanced understanding that would demand the use of highly specialized knowledge. It is this lack of complexity and challenge in the question that differentiates it from a truly difficult question that would garner a score of 5. Therefore, despite its accuracy, the question posed is more aligned with a score of 2, which signifies easy questions that involve straightforward application of common knowledge. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What 1939 film starring Judy Garland features a tornado, a yellow brick road, and a wicked witch?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Wizard of Oz\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Wizard of Oz\". The question should not contain the text \"The Wizard of Oz\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat 1939 film starring Judy Garland features a tornado, a yellow brick road, and a wicked witch?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response meets the given criteria by successfully generating a one-sentence question with the specific answer \"The Wizard of Oz\". The question does not contain the exact title of the movie but instead asks for certain elements that are associated with the story, such as a tornado, a yellow brick road, and a wicked witch. This indirect approach makes it challenging for the listener to guess the answer without recalling the movie specifically. The question invites reasoning and the recall of certain aspects of the film, which is in line with the criteria for a score of 4. So, the overall score is 4. [RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who built the Great Pyramid of Giza, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, around 2580 BC?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"ancient Egyptians\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"ancient Egyptians\". The question should not contain the text \"ancient Egyptians\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho built the Great Pyramid of Giza, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, around 2580 BC?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided in the response demonstrates a moderate level of challengingness, as per the score rubric. The question, \"Who built the Great Pyramid of Giza, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, around 2580 BC?\" is designed to elicit an answer that involves understanding of more complex concepts, namely historical and archaeological knowledge about ancient Egypt. However, the question does not explicitly ask for the name of the civilization, hence it does not completely align with the instruction to avoid explicit mention of \"ancient Egyptians\". The final phrasing of the query, while still addressing the historical event, doesn’t clearly state that the civilization is ancient Egyptians. Despite this, the nature of the question does not demand extensive calculations or highly specialized knowledge. It does involve intermediate calculations and multi-step problem-solving as it requires the inquirer to make logical connections between the Great Pyramid and its historical context. The answer, however, is the correct one, and if the instruction was to ensure the correctness of the answer, it was successfully achieved. So the overall score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which Gothic cathedral in France, built in the 12th century, was the setting for Victor Hugo's novel about a deformed bell-ringer?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Notre-Dame de Paris\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Notre-Dame de Paris\". The question should not contain the text \"Notre-Dame de Paris\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich Gothic cathedral in France, built in the 12th century, was the setting for Victor Hugo's novel about a deformed bell-ringer?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is moderately challenging as it requires knowledge of French Gothic architecture and a reference to a literary work that may not be widely known without a follow-up question specifying the novel. However, with this additional cue, the question becomes easier to answer specifically. This question not only asks for the name of the cathedral but also for the century in which it was built and the reference to Victor Hugo's work, thus showing a moderate level of complexity. This level of difficulty corresponds with a score of 3 on the provided rubric. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the youngest person to have simultaneously topped the Billboard Hot 100 and Album 200 charts?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Billie Eillish\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Billie Eillish\". The question should not contain the text \"Billie Eillish\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the youngest person to have simultaneously topped the Billboard Hot 100 and Album 200 charts?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]In terms of the score rubric, the question exhibits moderate complexity. It requires an understanding of the Billboard Hot 100 and Album 200 charts and the concept of simultaneous topping. Additionally, it involves some research, as the questioner is not providing the information that Billie Eillish has achieved this distinction. The question thus combines an application of music industry knowledge with the need to identify the correct individual, which requires further investigation. Therefore, the question presents a reasonable challenge that engages the questioner in problem-solving. While not highly specialized, the question is not as straightforward as one involving only basic knowledge. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which Norse god is known for being the adopted brother and nemesis of Thor?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Loki\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Loki\". The question should not contain the text \"Loki\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich Norse god is known for being the adopted brother and nemesis of Thor?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question, although not explicitly stating the name \"Loki\", requires a recognition of the character's relationships and roles within the context of mythology, which is an intermediate level of knowledge. It is somewhat challenging as it requires the respondent to apply knowledge about Norse mythology, potentially involving multi-step problem-solving. The challenge lies in the fact that the character's answer \"Loki\" would not be immediately obvious from the question itself, thus involving a certain degree of advanced understanding or the application of intermediate level reasoning skills. Hence, the score of 3 is appropriate for the complexity of this question. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who is the protagonist of Daniel Defoe's 1719 novel about a shipwrecked sailor who spends 28 years on a deserted island?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Robinson Crusoe\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Robinson Crusoe\". The question should not contain the text \"Robinson Crusoe\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the protagonist of Daniel Defoe's 1719 novel about a shipwrecked sailor who spends 28 years on a deserted island?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in this response is challenging and requires an understanding of literary analysis, as it refers to the novel by Daniel Defoe, \"Robinson Crusoe,\" without explicitly naming the book or its character, Robinson Crusoe. This question assumes the interlocutor has enough detailed knowledge of the novel while also requiring an intermediate level of thinking to connect the author, year of publication, the primary plot point (shipwreck), and the protagonist. It successfully avoids stating the answer \"Robinson Crusoe,\" in line with the instruction given. However, the question may be too specific for a general audience and lacks a simple answer, which could lead to confusion or misguided guesses. Therefore, it aligns more closely with a score of 3, given that it requires both basic knowledge of the novel and a moderate level of reasoning to fully grasp its requirements. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who delivered the famous "I Have a Dream" speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. on August 28, 1963?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Martin Luther King, Jr.\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Martin Luther King, Jr.\". The question should not contain the text \"Martin Luther King, Jr.\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho delivered the famous \"I Have a Dream\" speech on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. on August 28, 1963?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question has been constructed in a way that is easily understandable and requires a simple application of common knowledge. The query aims to identify the individual who is widely recognized for delivering the \"I Have a Dream\" speech. This is a question that can be answered accurately with a basic level of education and does not require any complex reasoning or advanced knowledge. It is a direct question that can be answered with a simple answer. The question does not use any unclear terminology, which makes it more accessible to the average person. Therefore, based on the evaluation criteria provided in the score rubric, the question would receive a score of 1, which is for questions that require basic knowledge or simple calculations. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the part of a plant that is often green and grows on the end of a stem?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"leaf\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"leaf\". The question should not contain the text \"leaf\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the part of a plant that is often green and grows on the end of a stem?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question requires only basic knowledge about plants, which is the understanding that leaves are parts of plants. The question was formulated in a way that a layperson can answer it, making it an easy question to answer. The content does not demand an extensive level of knowledge; it can be answered by almost anyone who has basic knowledge of plants. The phrasing \"grows on the end of a stem\" gives a clear indication of the part of a plant being referred to, which is why the question aligns well with the requirement of the task. Consequently, the question meets the criteria of being easy and straightforward without using the word \"leaf\", thus ensuring an answer of \"leaf\". So the overall score is 1. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
What is the term used to describe the total energy change of a system during a chemical reaction at constant pressure?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"change in enthalpy\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"change in enthalpy\". The question should not contain the text \"change in enthalpy\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the term used to describe the total energy change of a system during a chemical reaction at constant pressure?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented requires an understanding of chemical reactions, the role of temperature, and the significance of pressure in the context of chemical transformations. It implies a need for knowledge on the topic beyond the basic, as it is more than a simple definition question. The question shows an intermediate understanding, touching on some complex concepts such as the energy change during a reaction. While it doesn't directly mention the term \"change in enthalpy,\" it implies it by referring to the 'total energy change.' Hence, the response fits within the boundaries of the rubric, demonstrating a moderate level of difficulty. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the title of the dystopian novel by Ray Bradbury in which firemen burn books instead of putting out fires?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Fahrenheit 451\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Fahrenheit 451\". The question should not contain the text \"Fahrenheit 451\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the dystopian novel by Ray Bradbury in which firemen burn books instead of putting out fires?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question generated is moderately challenging, requiring an understanding of dystopian themes and knowledge about Ray Bradbury's works. It does not contain the text \"Fahrenheit 451\" and the question is not overly complex. However, it does involve some application of common knowledge about dystopian novels and Ray Bradbury's authorship. It is expected to receive a correct answer, though the answer itself could be seen as slightly more challenging to determine by the questioner. This is because the question does not explicitly state that only \"Fahrenheit 451\" will be an acceptable answer, potentially leading to confusion or a less focused search. Therefore, while the response is mostly effective, it could lead to some ambiguity in the actual execution of the question. The complexity lies more in the interpretation and context surrounding the question, rather than the question itself. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the title of Lil Nas X's debut studio album, released in 2021, which features the hit singles "Call Me By Your Name" and "Industry Baby"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"MONTERO\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"MONTERO\". The question should not contain the text \"MONTERO\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of Lil Nas X's debut studio album, released in 2021, which features the hit singles \"Call Me By Your Name\" and \"Industry Baby\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presents an easy riddle with a simple answer. It utilizes basic information about the release of a specific album and includes its notable singles. However, the question itself does not resemble the answer; \"MONTERO\" is not part of the question. In fact, it was specifically requested to avoid the text \"MONTERO\" and the response managed to adhere to that, albeit by not including the keyword in the question itself. Therefore, the question and the answer, despite not explicitly incorporating the keyword \"MONTERO\", are still accurately related, which aligns with the instructions provided.\n\n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What part of an orchestra typically includes instruments such as drums, cymbals, and xylophones?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"percussion section\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"percussion section\". The question should not contain the text \"percussion section\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat part of an orchestra typically includes instruments such as drums, cymbals, and xylophones?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question asks a targeted question about a specific part of an orchestra that includes several types of percussion instruments. This question successfully elicits the correct answer, \"percussion section,\" without explicitly mentioning the text \"percussion section\" in the question. The answer is easily deduced from the types of instruments named in the question, making it a straightforward question that does not involve complex reasoning or extensive calculations. Therefore, based on the rubric that evaluates the challenge level of the question, the question would be scored a 2 as it involves a straightforward application of common knowledge. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who played the role of Robin Hood in the 2000 TV movie "Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Jason\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Jason\". The question should not contain the text \"Jason\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho played the role of Robin Hood in the 2000 TV movie \"Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is not as challenging as one might expect, given the instruction. It invites a direct recall of a specific detail rather than any in-depth knowledge or complex reasoning. By focusing on the role and title of the movie, the question taps into the general public's knowledge, making it relatively easy. Therefore, the score is 2.\n\nHowever, it's important to note that while the question is somewhat straightforward, it still demonstrates an understanding of the task requirements, which is to generate a question that leads to the answer \"Jason\". The question's focus on a character (Robin Hood) aligns with the original instruction of creating a question that results in the given name.\n\nIn summary, while the question is not as complex as it could be, it satisfies the key requirements of the task and is thus appropriately scored.</s>"
] |
What is the name of the Old English epic poem's hero who battles Grendel and his mother?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Beowulf\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Beowulf\". The question should not contain the text \"Beowulf\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the name of the Old English epic poem's hero who battles Grendel and his mother?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question produced in this response is challenging because it requires a detailed understanding of the elements asked for: specifically, the hero of the \"Old English epic poem,\" the battles with Grendel and his mother, and an actual name that fits the given description. These requirements demonstrate that the question is not straightforward or easily answerable, thus it scores higher on the challenging scale. It is not just a question about an \"epic poem's hero\"; it demands to be identified by their role in a specific literary work, which requires the user to remember and apply precise, detailed information. The complexity and specificity of the task demonstrate a significant level of challenge for the user. Therefore, this response is appropriately scored as \"Very Hard\". \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
Who is credited with developing the concept of the Oedipus complex and is often referred to as the "father of psychoanalysis"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Sigmund Freud\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Sigmund Freud\". The question should not contain the text \"Sigmund Freud\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is credited with developing the concept of the Oedipus complex and is often referred to as the \"father of psychoanalysis\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in the response is easy to solve, as it uses common knowledge and simple concepts. It successfully avoids mentioning the name \"Sigmund Freud\" explicitly, yet when answered, the name will be evident in the response. The question involves identifying the person associated with the development of the Oedipus complex and their role as the \"father of psychoanalysis\". Therefore, based on the score rubric, the question does not require advanced understanding or multi-step problem-solving. It falls under the category of straightforward application of common knowledge, thus earning it a score of 2. The answer \"Sigmund Freud\" could be easily derived from the posed question. So the overall score is 2. [RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Which Ivy League institution in New Haven, Connecticut, was founded in 1701 as the Collegiate School of Connecticut?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Yale University\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Yale University\". The question should not contain the text \"Yale University\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich Ivy League institution in New Haven, Connecticut, was founded in 1701 as the Collegiate School of Connecticut?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The provided answer clearly states that the question is about Yale University, which directly contradicts the requirement given in the instruction. The instruction specifically dictates that the question should not contain the text \"Yale University\" as the possible answer must be \"Yale University\". In order for the question to be generated, it must not directly imply the correct answer, but instead challenge us with additional details or context that would lead to the answer. In this case, the wording of the generated question does contain the necessary details but in a way that is impossible for any other answer to be provided. Therefore, based on the given score rubric and the fact that the question does not adhere to the specifications given, it is clear that the response is unsatisfactory. The question generated is neither easy nor challenging; it simply states what the answer should be, negating the potential for any other answer to be valid. Therefore, taking into account the explicit requirements in the instructions and the absence of any challenge to the answer, it is evident that the answer fails to meet the criteria set by the rubric. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Who is the Italian scientist credited with proposing the hypothesis that equal volumes of gases at the same temperature and pressure contain an equal number of molecules?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Amedeo Avogadro\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Amedeo Avogadro\". The question should not contain the text \"Amedeo Avogadro\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Italian scientist credited with proposing the hypothesis that equal volumes of gases at the same temperature and pressure contain an equal number of molecules?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is a bit complex and assumes some level of understanding of scientific concepts, particularly related to the study of gases. However, it is relatively well-defined and poses a clear question about a specific Italian scientist known for a fundamental hypothesis in chemistry. The task requires a high level of knowledge, but the question itself is not exceedingly challenging to answer. Thus, it aligns more closely with the score 3: \"The question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\" The response, while correctly identifying the scientist, could potentially be improved by further refining the question to better match the level of challenge implied in the task. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the Afro-Caribbean religion that originated in West Africa and is characterized by the use of magic, spirits, and ritual practices?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Voodoo\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Voodoo\". The question should not contain the text \"Voodoo\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the Afro-Caribbean religion that originated in West Africa and is characterized by the use of magic, spirits, and ritual practices?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed in this response does indeed involve a deeper understanding of an intricate cultural and religious concept. It is clear from the description that the respondent must possess an advanced understanding of the topic to accurately form the question. However, it also requires a level of specialization on the topic of Afro-Caribbean religions, specifically identifying the core elements of a religion not commonly known in contemporary Western society. This advanced knowledge level meets the criteria for a score of 4 as outlined in the rubric. Additionally, the response adheres to the instruction by not explicitly mentioning \"Voodoo\" in the question, while still leading to the correct answer. The response, therefore, demonstrates an ability to generate a difficult, yet clear question that requires detailed knowledge to answer correctly. So, based on the established criteria, the generated response successfully meets the requirements for a high-level question, but it is not highly specialized or complex enough to merit a score of 5. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who was the American artist who famously silkscreened images of Campbell's Soup cans in the 1960s?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Andy Warhol\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Andy Warhol\". The question should not contain the text \"Andy Warhol\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the American artist who famously silkscreened images of Campbell's Soup cans in the 1960s?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question successfully adheres to the instruction of creating a one-sentence question with the answer \"Andy Warhol\", without using the correct answer within the question itself. It employs descriptive and knowledge-specific language, which requires a moderate understanding of art history. The question is somewhat challenging, as it involves recognizing the process of silkscreening and the associated cultural context, which is an intermediate level of knowledge to provide the correct answer. Hence, the question fits well into the score of 3, which indicates that the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which country's name is derived from the Old Persian word "aryāna", meaning "land of the Aryans"?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Iran\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Iran\". The question should not contain the text \"Iran\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country's name is derived from the Old Persian word \"aryāna\", meaning \"land of the Aryans\"?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is based on a complex linguistic concept, asking for a country's origin of its name, specifically derived from an Old Persian word. While it does require some knowledge of linguistics and world geography, it falls short of a highly specialized knowledge. The connection between the country and the Old Persian word is not immediately obvious; it requires some level of intermediate understanding of history and geography. However, the question isn't particularly challenging as it does not demand extensive calculations or advanced understanding in a detailed sense. Thus, based on the score rubric's criteria for challenges in questions, it is clear that this question is not overly challenging and does not require specialized knowledge. It fits more into the category of moderate difficulty. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What graphical representation of stars, plotting luminosity against surface temperature, is used to classify stars into main sequence, red giant, and white dwarf categories?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Hertzsprung-Russell diagram\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Hertzsprung-Russell diagram\". The question should not contain the text \"Hertzsprung-Russell diagram\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat graphical representation of stars, plotting luminosity against surface temperature, is used to classify stars into main sequence, red giant, and white dwarf categories?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided is relatively straightforward and can be answered without much complexity. It appeals to common knowledge about astronomical diagrams, specifically the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, and its use to categorize stars. The language used is appropriate and does not contain the direct answer \"Hertzsprung-Russell diagram,\" as stated in the instruction. However, the answer that is sought, while accurate, only displays an average level of complexity, as it does not delve deeper into how the diagram is used or require extensive calculations. Therefore, according to the score rubric, the question falls under the \"Moderate\" category. It demonstrates an intermediate level of understanding, as it requires knowledge of the topic, but it doesn't involve highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning to a large extent. So, the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the title of the novel by Victor Hugo that features the character Jean Valjean and has been adapted into numerous stage productions, including a famous musical?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Les Mis´erables\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Les Mis´erables\". The question should not contain the text \"Les Mis´erables\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the novel by Victor Hugo that features the character Jean Valjean and has been adapted into numerous stage productions, including a famous musical?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response successfully generates a question that is challenging and does not contain the text \"Les Mis´erables\". It manages to convey the essence of the novel - the character Jean Valjean and its numerous adaptations, making it moderately challenging. However, it could further enhance its difficulty by including a more nuanced aspect of the novel's history or interpretations. It is commendable that the response adheres to the given instruction and remains indirect, which aligns with the need to be sophisticated and less direct. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What mathematical concept represents the rate of change of a function with respect to one of its variables?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"derivative\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"derivative\". The question should not contain the text \"derivative\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat mathematical concept represents the rate of change of a function with respect to one of its variables?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question provided requires a substantial level of mathematical understanding, which is more than just a simple calculation or a straightforward application of common knowledge. The question seeks to define and understand the mathematical concept of a derivative, which is a complex mathematical idea. This understanding involves advanced knowledge, as the question pertains to the rate of change of a function with respect to one of its variables. The question is not as challenging as one that involves intricate calculations or highly specialized mathematical knowledge, but it certainly requires a high level of mathematical understanding, making it difficult for those less familiar with the concept of a derivative. Therefore, based on the score rubric, the question's difficulty level is \"Hard.\" \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which city in California is known for its iconic Golden Gate Bridge and steep hills?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"San Francisco\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"San Francisco\". The question should not contain the text \"San Francisco\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich city in California is known for its iconic Golden Gate Bridge and steep hills?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question in the response is appropriately tailored to invoke knowledge about a unique feature associated with a major city in the United States. It makes use of a specific cultural aspect, the Golden Gate Bridge, and another distinctive feature, the steep hills, which are all clues pointing towards San Francisco. The question doesn't explicitly state the name of the city, making it a true test of the question-asker's knowledge. Therefore, this question aligns well with the criteria of challenging the person answering, but still manages to be an easily answerable question. Hence, the question has moderate difficulty, fitting well within the range of 3 as per the score rubric. It is challenging enough to elicit a thoughtful answer, but not so difficult as to be unanswerable without specialized knowledge. This response adequately adheres to the format and the given instruction. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the process of rendering the meaning of a text or phrase from one language into another?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"translation\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"translation\". The question should not contain the text \"translation\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the process of rendering the meaning of a text or phrase from one language into another?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This response has successfully crafted a question that involves a process, specifically the translation of text from one language to another. However, the question is quite open-ended and does not pose a direct challenge, as it does not include the term \"translation\" explicitly, making it easier to address than what might be considered a truly challenging question. It would be up to the respondent to connect the idea of \"rendering the meaning of a text\" with the term \"translation\" to arrive at the correct answer. Therefore, it can be considered as moderately challenging. It does not require highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning, but it also does not rely on basic knowledge or simple concepts, as it asks for a process rather than a simple definition. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What classic tale by Rudyard Kipling tells the story of a young boy named Mowgli, raised by wolves in the Indian jungle?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"The Jungle Book\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"The Jungle Book\". The question should not contain the text \"The Jungle Book\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat classic tale by Rudyard Kipling tells the story of a young boy named Mowgli, raised by wolves in the Indian jungle?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question does not explicitly state \"The Jungle Book,\" fulfilling the task requirements. However, it does provide enough context for a well-informed answerer to deduce that the reference is to the classic tale by Rudyard Kipling. Thus, while the question is relatively easy, it still requires a certain degree of common knowledge about the subject matter, and as such, it fits within the realm of moderate challenge as per the score rubric. The question's ability to require knowledge without explicitly mentioning the answer in the prompt is commendable, maintaining the integrity of the task. However, the question could have been structured in a way that added a layer of intrigue or difficulty, such as by adding specific features or details about the story. This would have increased the challenge level, aligning it more closely with a score of 3 or 4. Despite this, the question demonstrated an appropriate level of difficulty for the task. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which group of Norse seafarers and warriors, known for their raids and conquests, originated from Scandinavia during the Viking Age?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"vikings\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"vikings\". The question should not contain the text \"vikings\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich group of Norse seafarers and warriors, known for their raids and conquests, originated from Scandinavia during the Viking Age?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question is well-crafted and does not make direct reference to \"vikings\". It prompts the reader to provide a specific answer related to Norse culture and history, assuming a level of knowledge about the Viking Age. The question does not contain the exact text \"vikings\", yet it leads to an answer that must mention \"vikings\". It requires the application of common knowledge about history, specifically the Viking Age, and aligns well with the task criteria. The response adheres to the rubric as it does not oversimplify the question but requires an intermediate level of understanding to answer correctly. Therefore, the question has a moderate difficulty level, making it a fitting answer for a score of 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who wrote the poem "The Raven" and was a pioneer of the detective fiction genre with his character C. Auguste Dupin?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Edgar Allan Poe\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Edgar Allan Poe\". The question should not contain the text \"Edgar Allan Poe\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho wrote the poem \"The Raven\" and was a pioneer of the detective fiction genre with his character C. Auguste Dupin?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question asked in the response provides an easy way to deduce that the answer is \"Edgar Allan Poe\". It leverages common knowledge about who wrote the famous poem \"The Raven\" and who is credited with creating the character C. Auguste Dupin. It also subtly incorporates the element of advanced understanding required to connect the dots without explicitly mentioning \"Edgar Allan Poe\". The question's format is also apt for the given instruction. Despite its complexity, the response meets the criteria, by creating a question that does not include the text \"Edgar Allan Poe\" yet still leads to it. Therefore, based on the score rubric provided, we see that the response demonstrates an intermediate level of complexity and understanding. However, it doesn't push beyond that into highly specialized knowledge, as it is still a common fact that Edgar Allan Poe wrote \"The Raven\". So the overall score is 3. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar, observed by Muslims worldwide as a month of fasting, reflection, and spiritual growth?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Ramadan\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Ramadan\". The question should not contain the text \"Ramadan\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar, observed by Muslims worldwide as a month of fasting, reflection, and spiritual growth?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated response is a perfect representation of the provided instruction. The question posed is challenging in the sense that it does not contain the word \"Ramadan\" and yet, it is designed to yield only one specific answer, which is indeed \"Ramadan\". This question not only avoids using the word 'Ramadan', but also manages to incorporate elements of the Islamic month, such as fasting, reflection, and spiritual growth, thereby requiring an advanced understanding or detailed knowledge about the topic. Such a nuanced inquiry into the Islamic calendar indeed reflects a high level of complexity and specialization. This clearly aligns with the score rubric's description for a score of 5. So, the response is evaluated as 5 for its adherence to the complexity of the question while also meeting the requirement of providing only one answer \"Ramadan\". [RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What element, with the atomic number 53, is commonly used in the treatment of thyroid disorders and as a disinfectant?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"iodine\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"iodine\". The question should not contain the text \"iodine\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat element, with the atomic number 53, is commonly used in the treatment of thyroid disorders and as a disinfectant?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question, while correctly formatted without the explicit mention of the element \"iodine\", is actually quite challenging for the average person to answer. This is due to the requirement of knowing the atomic number of a specific element, which is 53, and the need to connect this knowledge with the practical applications of the element in question. The question effectively avoids an overly simplistic prompt by requiring more than just common knowledge. Instead, it targets intermediate to advanced level of understanding, fitting well within the criteria of a score 4 response in the rubric. The challenge of identifying \"iodine\" as the element that is not just about its atomic structure, but also about its specific applications, demonstrates an adept use of the task instruction, successfully crafting an open-ended question that has only one possible answer. Moreover, the question manages to avoid the explicit mention of \"iodine,\" yet still hints at the element's identity, aligning with the task demands. Therefore, considering the complexity of the question and its adherence to the scoring criteria, it can be concluded that the response fulfills the expectations for a score 4 performance. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What conflict, fought from 1955 to 1975, involved the communist North Vietnamese and the anti-communist South Vietnamese, with the United States providing military and economic support to the latter?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Vietnam War\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Vietnam War\". The question should not contain the text \"Vietnam War\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat conflict, fought from 1955 to 1975, involved the communist North Vietnamese and the anti-communist South Vietnamese, with the United States providing military and economic support to the latter?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question effectively meets the criteria of being challenging. It requires an advanced understanding of a specific historical event without directly mentioning it. It presents a scenario that requires an extensive analysis of the various key elements involved in the Vietnam War, such as the opposing sides, the timeframe, and the global superpower's role. The question demands a multi-step problem-solving process, where the respondent must piece together the information necessary to arrive at the correct answer. It also assumes a degree of specialized knowledge about the political landscape and key international conflicts of the time, which many individuals might not possess. This complexity aligns with the scoring criteria, indicating that the question is highly challenging and requires a high level of reasoning and deductive understanding. Therefore, this response deserves a score of 5 as it fully meets the rubric's requirements for a question that is both challenging and specific in its requirements. \n[RESULT] 5</s>"
] |
What type of musical composition typically features a large orchestra and multiple movements?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"symphony\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"symphony\". The question should not contain the text \"symphony\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat type of musical composition typically features a large orchestra and multiple movements?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is quite clever in the way it circumvents the literal mention of the word \"symphony\". It does so by describing a type of musical composition without directly naming it. This approach is suitable for someone who might be a professional in the field of music and knows what a symphony is, but doesn't have the word \"symphony\" at their disposal or wish to use it, thus showing a high level of understanding of complex musicological concepts. It exhibits the nuances required to successfully identify a symphony by its characteristics rather than its name. This question also implies that there are other types of compositions, hinting at a wider range of musical genres. Nonetheless, the answer \"symphony\" remains the correct answer, as it aligns with the described characteristics. Based on the score rubric, this question requires advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving, which is why it is appropriate for a score of 4. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which country is home to the famous Palace of Versailles, the Louvre Museum, and the Eiffel Tower?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"France\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"France\". The question should not contain the text \"France\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country is home to the famous Palace of Versailles, the Louvre Museum, and the Eiffel Tower?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response effectively crafts a question that demands a complex understanding of global landmarks. It cleverly avoids simply asking for the name of the country without giving any context or hint. The question involves a degree of complexity by requiring the listener to recall and apply knowledge about different monuments across the world. The elements listed in the question – the Palace of Versailles, the Louvre Museum, and the Eiffel Tower – are globally recognized landmarks, thus requiring a more detailed and specific knowledge base. This level of complexity falls short of being considered 'Very Hard' as it doesn't require highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning, but it is more challenging than a simple question that directly asks for the country. However, when compared with a question that directly asks for the name of the country, the score increases for this response because it successfully navigates the instruction by formulating a complex and intriguing question that indirectly requires the recognition of France. Therefore, it fits more closely to the level of 'Hard' in the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which NBA team, founded in 1968, plays its home games at Fiserv Forum in Wisconsin?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Milwaukee Bucks\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Milwaukee Bucks\". The question should not contain the text \"Milwaukee Bucks\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich NBA team, founded in 1968, plays its home games at Fiserv Forum in Wisconsin?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question is formulated in a way that does not explicitly state the name of the Milwaukee Bucks. It involves a straightforward application of common knowledge about the National Basketball Association teams, their founding, and their home venues. While the question seems simple, it does require a certain level of understanding of relevant facts about the Milwaukee Bucks and NBA rules, which slightly elevates its difficulty compared to a very easy question. It does not demand an extensive calculation or highly specialized knowledge, but it does require intermediate knowledge as indicated in the score rubric. Therefore, the question would score a 2 based on its degree of difficulty as per the rubric. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
What is the title of the first part of Dante Alighieri's 14th-century Italian epic poem Divine Comedy?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Inferno\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Inferno\". The question should not contain the text \"Inferno\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the title of the first part of Dante Alighieri's 14th-century Italian epic poem Divine Comedy?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated question, \"What is the title of the first part of Dante Alighieri's 14th-century Italian epic poem Divine Comedy?\", certainly meets the instructions given. It implies a deeper understanding of the works of Dante and could be considered challenging because it involves recalling specific details about literary works, which might be complex for some individuals. However, the question's complexity does not quite align with the provided score rubric. It falls under the 'Very Hard' category, which should involve highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning. While the question does require a degree of detailed knowledge, the reference to a first part might be too vague, leading to confusion. The question could be improved with a more specific reference to the first part's common title or the initial literary device used. Despite these minor shortcomings, the question presents a sufficient amount of challenge for the expected answer. Therefore, the quality of the question is comparable to the given example and does not outperform or underperform significantly in terms of difficulty. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What is the capital city of Texas that is also known for its vibrant music scene and hosts the annual South by Southwest festival?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Austin\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Austin\". The question should not contain the text \"Austin\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the capital city of Texas that is also known for its vibrant music scene and hosts the annual South by Southwest festival?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The generated response effectively constructs a question that is informative, interesting, and directly asks for the answer \"Austin\". However, it delves deeper into the description of the capital city and its music scene, offering more than just a straightforward question that might require simple knowledge. It requires a slight understanding of the geographical context, and it might also prompt the search for knowledge on the South by Southwest festival. The question could be more challenging if it didn't mention the festival, as it could be inferred without knowing about the event. Hence, the response can be seen as moderately challenging based on the rubric criteria, as it goes beyond just knowing the capital city of Texas. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What is the waxy, fat-like substance found in every cell of the human body that is also a major component of bile and plays a vital role in the production of hormones and vitamin D?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"cholesterol\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"cholesterol\". The question should not contain the text \"cholesterol\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat is the waxy, fat-like substance found in every cell of the human body that is also a major component of bile and plays a vital role in the production of hormones and vitamin D?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]This question demonstrates a high level of complexity by inquiring about a substance that requires an understanding of its place in the body. It subtly prompts the respondent to consider the roles cholesterol plays in human physiology, including the production of hormones and the formation of bile without explicitly asking for \"cholesterol\". It goes beyond simple questions that would not warrant specific knowledge about this particular substance. Thus, while it doesn't explicitly ask for \"cholesterol,\" the question does require a nuanced understanding of cholesterol's multifaceted role in the body. These traits align with a scoring of 4, as it demands advanced understanding and detailed knowledge. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Who was the Cuban revolutionary and politician who led the country from 1959 to 2008 and was known for his socialist policies and anti-American stance?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Fidel Castro\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Fidel Castro\". The question should not contain the text \"Fidel Castro\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho was the Cuban revolutionary and politician who led the country from 1959 to 2008 and was known for his socialist policies and anti-American stance?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question was crafted using an approach that demanded a high level of understanding of historical events and personalities. This is apparent when you consider the response generated. It mentions the roles Fidel Castro played, the duration of his tenure as the head of state, and his political stances. While some people may have a basic knowledge of Castro's life, the complexity of the question, as indicated by the mention of his socialist policies and his anti-American stance, suggests a requirement for more advanced understanding of historical events and figures. Consequently, this response aligns better with a score of 4 as it represents a question that demands a significant degree of detailed knowledge and critical thinking. The response avoids using the text \"Fidel Castro\", as per the instructions, yet remains challenging and informative. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
What mathematical operation is denoted by a superscript number and represents repeated multiplication of a base number by itself?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"exponentiation\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"exponentiation\". The question should not contain the text \"exponentiation\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat mathematical operation is denoted by a superscript number and represents repeated multiplication of a base number by itself?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response given is moderately challenging. It requires an understanding of intermediate concepts such as supercripts and the meaning behind them. The question presents a question about what a certain mathematical operation is, indicating what its operations look like, but it does not explicitly include the word \"exponentiation\". It demonstrates a level of complexity that is neither too simple nor too complex, requiring an intermediate level of problem-solving and understanding. The question effectively steers away from using the exact term \"exponentiation\" and challenges someone to understand its description. Therefore, in the context of the score rubric that asks for the difficulty level of the question, this response is suitable for a score of 3, as it lies in the middle of the difficulty spectrum. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
What device is commonly used to remove dirt and dust from floors and surfaces using suction?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"vacuum\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"vacuum\". The question should not contain the text \"vacuum\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhat device is commonly used to remove dirt and dust from floors and surfaces using suction?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question posed by the response is clear and unambiguous, reflecting a moderate level of challenge. It is not overly complex but does require some understanding of household appliances, particularly the function of a vacuum cleaner. Therefore, this response does a good job of adhering to the instruction of not including the word \"vacuum\" in the question, while still posing a question that can only be answered by \"vacuum\". However, the question still leaves room for the interpretation of \"device\", which could potentially lead to answers like \"dustpan\" if not correctly specified. So, the balance of complexity and clarity results in this response receiving a score of 3 based on the score rubric. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which country is home to the highest number of centenarians per capita in the world?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Japan\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Japan\". The question should not contain the text \"Japan\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich country is home to the highest number of centenarians per capita in the world?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question involves the application of world-wide data and does not require any complex knowledge or calculations. This makes the question easy, scoring it a 2 according to the score rubric. While the question's query about the number of centenarians per capita demands some level of knowledge about global population and health status, that knowledge is basic and can be easily accessed. The question does not involve highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations, which are characteristics of a question earning a score of 5. Therefore, a score of 2 is appropriate for this response. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who is the Italian polymath and artist who painted the Mona Lisa and designed flying machines?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Leonardo da Vinci\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Leonardo da Vinci\". The question should not contain the text \"Leonardo da Vinci\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho is the Italian polymath and artist who painted the Mona Lisa and designed flying machines?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response is a well-articulated question that subtly prompts for the identification of \"Leonardo da Vinci\" without explicitly stating the answer. It does not contain the text \"Leonardo da Vinci\", thereby fulfilling the task requirements. Moreover, the question is designed in a way that requires knowledge about Italian artists and inventors, which goes beyond basic knowledge and necessitates an intermediate understanding of the subject matter. This is reflected in the complexity of the concepts, as indicated in the score rubric for a score of 3. As such, the response demonstrates a fair understanding of the task, and it aligns well with the scoring criteria, demonstrating a moderate level of challenge in the question. Therefore, the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Who wrote "Das Kapital" and is credited with developing the theory of communism?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Karl Marx\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Karl Marx\". The question should not contain the text \"Karl Marx\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho wrote \"Das Kapital\" and is credited with developing the theory of communism?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given question is relatively straightforward and does not require a high level of specialized knowledge. The ability to connect the authorship of a certain work to the person responsible is a common knowledge area. Therefore, the question does not fall under the score rubric's criteria for more complex questions or advanced problem-solving. The question can be answered by most people, including those with limited knowledge of the subject matter. In this context, the question is easy to understand and does not pose a significant challenge for the answerer. \n[RESULT] 2</s>"
] |
Who, in Greek mythology, was the queen of the underworld and the wife of Hades?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Persephone\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Persephone\". The question should not contain the text \"Persephone\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWho, in Greek mythology, was the queen of the underworld and the wife of Hades?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The challenge level for the given task is 1, as the question presented involves a relatively basic question of Greek mythology. The task requires recognizing the queen of the underworld as well as naming her and her husband, to which only \"Persephone\" and \"Hades\" satisfy the requirement. The difficulty does not lie in the complexity of the task or the specialization required to solve it, but rather in the clarity and specificity of the question itself. Therefore, the response given effectively fulfills the task and achieves a basic level of challenge, as it is a straightforward application of common knowledge about Greek mythology. The score rubric accurately places this task at a level of challenge 1. \n[RESULT] 1</s>"
] |
Which planet in our solar system has the strongest winds, with gusts reaching up to 2,100 kilometers per hour?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Neptune\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Neptune\". The question should not contain the text \"Neptune\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich planet in our solar system has the strongest winds, with gusts reaching up to 2,100 kilometers per hour?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The given response demonstrates a strong grasp of astronomical concepts and data, requiring an understanding of the conditions on each planet in our solar system. This question specifically asks for the planet with the strongest winds, a fact that is known to be true of Neptune, thus necessitating an advanced level of knowledge concerning the topic. Additionally, the question subtly hints at the answer by referencing the wind speed on Neptune, rather than overtly mentioning the term \"Neptune.\" This strategic formulation of the question is precisely what the task instruction asked for. By focusing the query on a specific feature without directly naming the subject, the question is challenging to answer but not overly complex, striking a balance between intermediate understanding and specialized knowledge. It prompts a detailed knowledge answer while avoiding the explicit mention of the term \"Neptune,\" adhering to the task instruction. Therefore, in accordance with the score rubric, this response is given a score of 4 because it meets the criteria of requiring advanced understanding and detailed knowledge. \n[RESULT] 4</s>"
] |
Which surname is shared by the three English novelists Charlotte, Emily, and Anne, authors of Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights, and Agnes Grey, respectively?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Bront¨e\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Bront¨e\". The question should not contain the text \"Bront¨e\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich surname is shared by the three English novelists Charlotte, Emily, and Anne, authors of Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights, and Agnes Grey, respectively?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The response is a question that poses a fact about the shared surname of the three English novelists. This question does not require a highly specialized knowledge or complex reasoning, but rather the application of common knowledge about authors. It does not involve substantial problem-solving, but rather the memorization of certain authors and their associated works. The question is moderately challenging, requiring a basic level of knowledge about the authors and their works. Therefore, in accordance with the score rubric, the question would be evaluated as a moderate level of difficulty. \n[RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Which state is known for being the final destination of the Oregon Trail?
|
[
"<s> [INST] You are a fair judge assistant tasked with providing clear, objective feedback based on specific criteria, ensuring each assessment reflects the absolute standards set for performance.\n\n###Task Description:\nAn instruction (might include an Input inside it), a response to evaluate, and a score rubric representing a evaluation criteria are given.\n1. Write a detailed feedback that assess the quality of the response strictly based on the given score rubric, not evaluating in general.\n2. After writing a feedback, write a score that is an integer between 1 and 5. You should refer to the score rubric.\n3. The output format should look as follows: \"(write a feedback for criteria) [RESULT] (an integer number between 1 and 5)\"\n4. Please do not generate any other opening, closing, and explanations.\n\n###The instruction to evaluate:\nGenerate a one-sentence question with the answer: \"Oregon\". The only possible answer to the question must be \"Oregon\". The question should not contain the text \"Oregon\". Please format your output as \"Question: [insert generated question]\". If no possible question exists say \"IDK\".\n\n###Response to evaluate:\nWhich state is known for being the final destination of the Oregon Trail?\n\n###Score Rubrics:\n[How challenging is the question?]\nScore 1: Very Easy; the question requires basic knowledge or a simple calculation.\nScore 2: Easy; the question involves straightforward application of common knowledge or simple concepts.\nScore 3: Moderate; the question requires understanding of more complex concepts or intermediate calculations.\nScore 4: Hard; the question demands advanced understanding, detailed knowledge, or multi-step problem-solving.\nScore 5: Very Hard; the question involves highly specialized knowledge, complex reasoning, or extensive calculations.\n\n###Feedback: [/INST]The question presented is quite straightforward, merely requiring the application of basic geographical knowledge. However, its level of difficulty could be considered slightly higher than the most basic questions as it requires the understanding of historical context. The question makes no direct reference to the word \"Oregon,\" aligning with the given instruction, but it does so in a manner that might be challenging to those without a basic understanding of American history. The task involves answering a question based on the geographical significance of \"Oregon\". This is a subtle nuance that might require more than just the most rudimentary geographical knowledge. Thus, while the question is not overly complicated, it is still challenging enough to require an intermediate level of understanding. The question aligns with the score of 3 in the rubric, indicating a moderate level of difficulty. So the overall score is 3. [RESULT] 3</s>"
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.