Join the conversation

Join the community of Machine Learners and AI enthusiasts.

Sign Up
hesamation 
posted an update 1 day ago
Post
1258
OpenAI just released a 34-page practical guide to building agents,

Here's 10 things it teaches us:

1➜ agents are different from workflows: they are complete autonomous systems that perform tasks on your behalf. many applications use LLMs for workflows, but this is not an agent.

2➜ use them for tricky stuff: complex decision making, dynamic rules, unstructured data

3➜ core recipe: each agent has three main components: Model (the brain), Tools, Instructions on how to behave

4➜ choose the right brain: set up evals to get a baseline performance, use a smart model to see what's possible, gradually downgrade the model for cost and speed

5➜ tools are key: choose well-defined and tested tools. an agent needs tools to retrieve data and context, and take actions.

6➜ instruction matters A LOT: be super clear telling the agent its goals, steps, and rules. Vague instructions = unpredictable agent. Be explicit.

7➜ start simple, then scale: often a single agent with several tools is ok. don't jump to complex multi-agent systems immediately.

8➜ if you use multi-agents: you can have a "manager" agent directing traffic to specialist agents, or have agents hand off tasks to each other.

9➜ gaurdrails are a MUST: check user input for weird stuff, make sure the agent isn't about to do something risky, filter out private info, block harmful content. Don't let it run wild.

10➜ build and plan for humans: start small, test, improve. always have a plan for when the agent gets stuck or is about to do something high-risk.

Download: https://t.co/fJaCkgf7ph

where did you find this

·

Linkedin, I included the link.

Nonsense! Seems like nobody is thinking here, just blindly accepting nicely presented terms and principles that contradict to everything we learn in computing.

First off, they're telling us that "agents are different from workflows." Really? You don't say. Did anybody think of those statements before spreading more fire around?

Does the so-called "Open"AI wish to say how workflows are not autonomous, but agents are autonomous? And they are not workflows? One big WTF!!!!!!!

And then there's point two: use these agents for complex decision-making because they're great with unstructured data. Sure thing! Let’s just ignore all those decades of research into structured databases and clear logic flows.

The "core recipe" is pure comedy gold—Model (the brain), Tools, Instructions on how to behave. Because nothing says robust software design like giving an AI a set of instructions that could be as vague or specific as the developer feels like at any given moment.

Tools are key. Great advice! Because nothing says reliable software quite like relying on well-defined tools that might or might not interact predictably with each other.

Finally, build and plan for humans because agents might get stuck or do high-risk things? Well no duh! I guess all those principles about fail-safes and error handling were just too boring to consider.

That breaks the "autonomous" feature of an agent.

The so-called "Open"AI wants users to baby-sit those "agents".

I just guess they made that guy by having one or more of their excellent models "hallucinate" and their engineers are laughing in background on how people believe this nonsense.

They are not guiding us in right direction.