Unnamed: 0,id,type,created_at,repo,repo_url,action,title,labels,body,index,text_combine,label,text,binary_label
9097,24037540463.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 20:42:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Exclusions,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"
Please provide more information on what folders to exclude and include as part of the redirections.xml. You specifically say not to exclude %appdata%\Microsoft\Teams, but what folders can we exclude? It contradicts what I've found in the following article which excludes several folders within %appdata%\Microsoft\Teams. Our FSLogix profile folders are getting very large (10-20 GB) and we need to know what is safe to exclude.
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-virtual-desktop/wvd-fslogix-reduce-profile-container-size-exclude-teams-cache/m-p/1503683
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Exclusions -
Please provide more information on what folders to exclude and include as part of the redirections.xml. You specifically say not to exclude %appdata%\Microsoft\Teams, but what folders can we exclude? It contradicts what I've found in the following article which excludes several folders within %appdata%\Microsoft\Teams. Our FSLogix profile folders are getting very large (10-20 GB) and we need to know what is safe to exclude.
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-virtual-desktop/wvd-fslogix-reduce-profile-container-size-exclude-teams-cache/m-p/1503683
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,exclusions please provide more information on what folders to exclude and include as part of the redirections xml you specifically say not to exclude appdata microsoft teams but what folders can we exclude it contradicts what i ve found in the following article which excludes several folders within appdata microsoft teams our fslogix profile folders are getting very large gb and we need to know what is safe to exclude document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afaf content content source service architecture center github login christiaanbrinkhoff microsoft alias pnp ,1
6210,13925893144.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-21 17:29:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How is SignalR used,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"I would love to see more about the SignalR implementation details
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c3bee659-9929-c4e8-3f4c-de328edcab1c
* Version Independent ID: 7747dfe6-f1df-d54a-e703-128d0bad2697
* Content: [Instant Broadcasting on Serverless Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"How is SignalR used - I would love to see more about the SignalR implementation details
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c3bee659-9929-c4e8-3f4c-de328edcab1c
* Version Independent ID: 7747dfe6-f1df-d54a-e703-128d0bad2697
* Content: [Instant Broadcasting on Serverless Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,how is signalr used i would love to see more about the signalr implementation details document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10459,26992473992.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-09 21:08:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add numbers to diagram,assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"there is a numerical listing below the diagram, it would be helpful if the diagram showed the numbers so that the text descriptions could be more easily correlated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d2c472ec-9be4-6e0e-eac6-0236e2e1044a
* Version Independent ID: d2c472ec-9be4-6e0e-eac6-0236e2e1044a
* Content: [Network-hardened web app - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/hardened-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/security/hardened-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/security/hardened-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @damaccar
* Microsoft Alias: **damaccar**",1.0,"Add numbers to diagram - there is a numerical listing below the diagram, it would be helpful if the diagram showed the numbers so that the text descriptions could be more easily correlated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d2c472ec-9be4-6e0e-eac6-0236e2e1044a
* Version Independent ID: d2c472ec-9be4-6e0e-eac6-0236e2e1044a
* Content: [Network-hardened web app - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/hardened-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/security/hardened-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/security/hardened-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @damaccar
* Microsoft Alias: **damaccar**",1,add numbers to diagram there is a numerical listing below the diagram it would be helpful if the diagram showed the numbers so that the text descriptions could be more easily correlated document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login damaccar microsoft alias damaccar ,1
3620,9882737025.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-24 17:37:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Serverless Microservices and Service meshes,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-idea reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Does a microservices using serverless need a Service meshes?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f259ccea-882e-9496-27cf-af8d13edaae4
* Version Independent ID: a7bab5c8-7227-e836-a721-0c54f94a2d8c
* Content: [Interservice communication in microservices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/design/interservice-communication#next-steps)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/interservice-communication.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/design/interservice-communication.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Serverless Microservices and Service meshes - Does a microservices using serverless need a Service meshes?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f259ccea-882e-9496-27cf-af8d13edaae4
* Version Independent ID: a7bab5c8-7227-e836-a721-0c54f94a2d8c
* Content: [Interservice communication in microservices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/design/interservice-communication#next-steps)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/interservice-communication.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/design/interservice-communication.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,serverless microservices and service meshes does a microservices using serverless need a service meshes document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9117,24055233947.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 16:11:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Data Lake Store Reference not really clear,bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
In the command line tools table ""others"", is not really clear ""Copy to Data Lake Store"" and ""Copy from Data Lake Store"" to what is referred.
AzCopy is set to ""Copy from Data Lake Store"" -> ""NO""
what does it means? you cannot read data from where? Data Lake Store is referred to third part Data Lake Store? someone could think that has not capabilities to copy from Azure Data Lake Storage
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3c6e037b-a226-62cf-6e2b-2af8783b7add
* Version Independent ID: c666597e-52ae-ee51-474a-c4dd3a63941b
* Content: [Choosing a data transfer technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/data-transfer#key-selection-criteria)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/data-transfer.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/scenarios/data-transfer.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Data Lake Store Reference not really clear -
In the command line tools table ""others"", is not really clear ""Copy to Data Lake Store"" and ""Copy from Data Lake Store"" to what is referred.
AzCopy is set to ""Copy from Data Lake Store"" -> ""NO""
what does it means? you cannot read data from where? Data Lake Store is referred to third part Data Lake Store? someone could think that has not capabilities to copy from Azure Data Lake Storage
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3c6e037b-a226-62cf-6e2b-2af8783b7add
* Version Independent ID: c666597e-52ae-ee51-474a-c4dd3a63941b
* Content: [Choosing a data transfer technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/data-transfer#key-selection-criteria)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/data-transfer.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/scenarios/data-transfer.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,data lake store reference not really clear in the command line tools table others is not really clear copy to data lake store and copy from data lake store to what is referred azcopy is set to copy from data lake store no what does it means you cannot read data from where data lake store is referred to third part data lake store someone could think that has not capabilities to copy from azure data lake storage document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
4435,11114301933.0,IssuesEvent,2019-12-18 08:20:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Add comparison details about Regions, Azure geographies, Availability Zone and Region pairs",Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"Hi Team,
It will be informative if we have comparison details about Azure regions, Azure geographies, Availability Zone and Region pairs with AWS regions, Availability Zone and Local Zone.
Thanks,
Manasa
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Add comparison details about Regions, Azure geographies, Availability Zone and Region pairs - Hi Team,
It will be informative if we have comparison details about Azure regions, Azure geographies, Availability Zone and Region pairs with AWS regions, Availability Zone and Local Zone.
Thanks,
Manasa
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,add comparison details about regions azure geographies availability zone and region pairs hi team it will be informative if we have comparison details about azure regions azure geographies availability zone and region pairs with aws regions availability zone and local zone thanks manasa document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
3807,10167698124.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-07 18:52:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Max lenght of the subscription name?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Hi,
For most resources listed above, there is a min and max length for the name. But this is not stated for subscriptions. It would be nice if this was added :-)
Regards Peter
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Max lenght of the subscription name? - Hi,
For most resources listed above, there is a min and max length for the name. But this is not stated for subscriptions. It would be nice if this was added :-)
Regards Peter
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,max lenght of the subscription name hi for most resources listed above there is a min and max length for the name but this is not stated for subscriptions it would be nice if this was added regards peter document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9183,24171824434.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-22 19:59:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,New Azure Databricks logo,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks logo on the [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics) reference architecture diagram? I have created an [updated architecture diagram image](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ij7lT4BKzMrOit3MlyGH7ySA1J6yWoL_/), using the [new SVG Databricks icon](https://drive.google.com/file/d/13z9cECUZsyu8ZjWzHErUZbAhuO_jXlUK/).
Thank you!
Clinton Ford
Principal Product Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"New Azure Databricks logo - Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks logo on the [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics) reference architecture diagram? I have created an [updated architecture diagram image](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ij7lT4BKzMrOit3MlyGH7ySA1J6yWoL_/), using the [new SVG Databricks icon](https://drive.google.com/file/d/13z9cECUZsyu8ZjWzHErUZbAhuO_jXlUK/).
Thank you!
Clinton Ford
Principal Product Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,new azure databricks logo hi could you help me update the azure databricks logo on the reference architecture diagram i have created an using the thank you clinton ford principal product marketing manager databricks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9631,24934257579.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-31 14:03:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,HELLO WOLD,cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 064087b4-3a9c-21a1-04e6-af522f587157
* Version Independent ID: 1d2dd6fd-4dcd-5d6e-a148-4edadbff9bf4
* Content: [Serverless functions architecture design - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/serverless-quest/serverless-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/serverless-quest/serverless-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/serverless-quest/serverless-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @rogeriohc
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"HELLO WOLD -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 064087b4-3a9c-21a1-04e6-af522f587157
* Version Independent ID: 1d2dd6fd-4dcd-5d6e-a148-4edadbff9bf4
* Content: [Serverless functions architecture design - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/serverless-quest/serverless-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/serverless-quest/serverless-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/serverless-quest/serverless-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @rogeriohc
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,hello wold document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login rogeriohc microsoft alias architectures ,1
9758,25159387311.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 15:44:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Update around connecting ASC to sentinel,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Hi team,
I think this page need some updates around connect ASC to sentinel. There is no ASC in data connectors list in sentinel, instead, I think it should be Azure Defender. I also find this page to support my assumption.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sentinel/connect-azure-security-center
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dce3b9c5-ef05-1ff3-a6fe-052f48a9b471
* Version Independent ID: f6d3e8e8-37c5-43e6-6185-58f8511dee7e
* Content: [Hybrid Security Monitoring using Azure Security Center and Azure Sentinel - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Update around connecting ASC to sentinel -
Hi team,
I think this page need some updates around connect ASC to sentinel. There is no ASC in data connectors list in sentinel, instead, I think it should be Azure Defender. I also find this page to support my assumption.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sentinel/connect-azure-security-center
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dce3b9c5-ef05-1ff3-a6fe-052f48a9b471
* Version Independent ID: f6d3e8e8-37c5-43e6-6185-58f8511dee7e
* Content: [Hybrid Security Monitoring using Azure Security Center and Azure Sentinel - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,update around connecting asc to sentinel hi team i think this page need some updates around connect asc to sentinel there is no asc in data connectors list in sentinel instead i think it should be azure defender i also find this page to support my assumption document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5478,12557633263.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-07 13:34:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Updated pricing options,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Need to update the pricing section to also include serverless and autoscaling tiers
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Updated pricing options -
[Enter feedback here]
Need to update the pricing section to also include serverless and autoscaling tiers
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,updated pricing options need to update the pricing section to also include serverless and autoscaling tiers document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9493,24693789440.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-19 10:29:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,building solutions for high availabityusing availability zones,cxp product-feedback triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"very useful
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"building solutions for high availabityusing availability zones - very useful
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,building solutions for high availabityusing availability zones very useful document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
4434,11114222312.0,IssuesEvent,2019-12-18 08:07:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Pricing demonstrated are monthly or daily?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp example-scenarios/subsvc product-question triaged,"The pricing example given here, is it per month or on daily basis?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 36cc3d81-d33a-bc9b-ab91-d7c4c8e26a95
* Version Independent ID: d3ce3924-f004-a61a-867c-b81fae8cf5f9
* Content: [Sharing location in real time using low-cost serverless Azure services - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/signalr/?WT.mc_id=linkedin&fbclid=IwAR1Baz9IpezPDUMOspz7luGss4qe0ievd6xqzkVMe0Dvg1STKkC4OBi9Eqw#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/signalr/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/signalr/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenarios**
* GitHub Login: @talhanaveed
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Pricing demonstrated are monthly or daily? - The pricing example given here, is it per month or on daily basis?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 36cc3d81-d33a-bc9b-ab91-d7c4c8e26a95
* Version Independent ID: d3ce3924-f004-a61a-867c-b81fae8cf5f9
* Content: [Sharing location in real time using low-cost serverless Azure services - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/signalr/?WT.mc_id=linkedin&fbclid=IwAR1Baz9IpezPDUMOspz7luGss4qe0ievd6xqzkVMe0Dvg1STKkC4OBi9Eqw#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/signalr/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/signalr/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenarios**
* GitHub Login: @talhanaveed
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,pricing demonstrated are monthly or daily the pricing example given here is it per month or on daily basis document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenarios github login talhanaveed microsoft alias pnp ,1
11404,30349001323.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-11 17:26:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Jupyter Notebook link not working,assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Jupyter Notebook link not working
(404 error)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa815b05-e4be-75fd-04bb-9136b6228502
* Version Independent ID: aa815b05-e4be-75fd-04bb-9136b6228502
* Content: [Conversation summarization - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/conversation-summarization)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/ai/conversation-summarization.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/ai/conversation-summarization.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @mejani
* Microsoft Alias: **mejani**",1.0,"Jupyter Notebook link not working - Jupyter Notebook link not working
(404 error)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa815b05-e4be-75fd-04bb-9136b6228502
* Version Independent ID: aa815b05-e4be-75fd-04bb-9136b6228502
* Content: [Conversation summarization - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/conversation-summarization)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/ai/conversation-summarization.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/ai/conversation-summarization.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @mejani
* Microsoft Alias: **mejani**",1,jupyter notebook link not working jupyter notebook link not working error document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login mejani microsoft alias mejani ,1
9565,24825085953.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-25 19:53:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Question regarding ""Performance acceleration""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"The final decision asks ""Do you require performance acceleration"" and pushes towards Front Door + Application Gateway (as opposed to just App Gateway) if the answer is ""yes"". There's no clear rational or explanation as to why this decision is there, as it's my understanding that Front Door doesn't provide any performance acceleration improvements over App Gateway, and instead the only appreciable benefit to Front Door over App Gateway is the prior is Global and currently can't pass traffic directly to resources with a Private IP.
Given that many will take this flow chart as gospel, it seems sensible to expand on the rational behind the decisions if at all possible.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview#decision-tree-for-load-balancing-in-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Question regarding ""Performance acceleration"" - The final decision asks ""Do you require performance acceleration"" and pushes towards Front Door + Application Gateway (as opposed to just App Gateway) if the answer is ""yes"". There's no clear rational or explanation as to why this decision is there, as it's my understanding that Front Door doesn't provide any performance acceleration improvements over App Gateway, and instead the only appreciable benefit to Front Door over App Gateway is the prior is Global and currently can't pass traffic directly to resources with a Private IP.
Given that many will take this flow chart as gospel, it seems sensible to expand on the rational behind the decisions if at all possible.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview#decision-tree-for-load-balancing-in-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,question regarding performance acceleration the final decision asks do you require performance acceleration and pushes towards front door application gateway as opposed to just app gateway if the answer is yes there s no clear rational or explanation as to why this decision is there as it s my understanding that front door doesn t provide any performance acceleration improvements over app gateway and instead the only appreciable benefit to front door over app gateway is the prior is global and currently can t pass traffic directly to resources with a private ip given that many will take this flow chart as gospel it seems sensible to expand on the rational behind the decisions if at all possible document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9599,24878062940.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-27 21:05:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio Link does not exactly represent this Architecture diagram,needs-art doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Visio Link does not exactly represent this Architecture diagram. Please Update or refresh this to correct Visio diagram.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Visio Link does not exactly represent this Architecture diagram -
Visio Link does not exactly represent this Architecture diagram. Please Update or refresh this to correct Visio diagram.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio link does not exactly represent this architecture diagram visio link does not exactly represent this architecture diagram please update or refresh this to correct visio diagram document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
4668,11563377033.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-20 05:51:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Medical Data Storage Solutions,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp product-question triaged,"I would like to have a full detailed architecture about the above.
I want to build a solution for my local hospital
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7f5f1109-6e79-d75f-44a6-c573e214e351
* Version Independent ID: a63bdc30-afca-f42a-591b-2c4c2abfc025
* Content: [Medical Data Storage Solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Medical Data Storage Solutions - I would like to have a full detailed architecture about the above.
I want to build a solution for my local hospital
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7f5f1109-6e79-d75f-44a6-c573e214e351
* Version Independent ID: a63bdc30-afca-f42a-591b-2c4c2abfc025
* Content: [Medical Data Storage Solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,medical data storage solutions i would like to have a full detailed architecture about the above i want to build a solution for my local hospital document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afca content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
3777,10114864413.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-30 20:15:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Traefik does not support routing to partitioned (stateful) services,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"In the API Gateway section where it discusses using Traefik as a gateway to services in a Service Fabric cluster or in advanced scenarios for interservice routing within the cluster, it should be noted that Traefik, unlike Azure API Management, does not have functionality to resolve the partition of a service that a request should be routed to for stateful services with > 1 partition. More background can be found here: https://github.com/containous/traefik/issues/3224
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9d154d16-2727-4327-628e-3ae9e075342f
* Version Independent ID: 59b36468-c9dc-89d9-607c-a2a16a5274b9
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Service Fabric](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/service-fabric#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/service-fabric.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/service-fabric.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Traefik does not support routing to partitioned (stateful) services - In the API Gateway section where it discusses using Traefik as a gateway to services in a Service Fabric cluster or in advanced scenarios for interservice routing within the cluster, it should be noted that Traefik, unlike Azure API Management, does not have functionality to resolve the partition of a service that a request should be routed to for stateful services with > 1 partition. More background can be found here: https://github.com/containous/traefik/issues/3224
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9d154d16-2727-4327-628e-3ae9e075342f
* Version Independent ID: 59b36468-c9dc-89d9-607c-a2a16a5274b9
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Service Fabric](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/service-fabric#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/service-fabric.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/service-fabric.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,traefik does not support routing to partitioned stateful services in the api gateway section where it discusses using traefik as a gateway to services in a service fabric cluster or in advanced scenarios for interservice routing within the cluster it should be noted that traefik unlike azure api management does not have functionality to resolve the partition of a service that a request should be routed to for stateful services with gt partition more background can be found here document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10017,26019775129.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-21 11:35:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Typo in last sentence under ""Scenario details""",doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"""Containers easily other Azure resources like storage and database services.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fc9f55da-2d42-5ae9-9998-0088aa523884
* Version Independent ID: fc9f55da-2d42-5ae9-9998-0088aa523884
* Content: [Lift and shift to containers with Azure App Service - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/migrate-existing-applications-to-container-apps)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/migrate-existing-applications-to-container-apps.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/migrate-existing-applications-to-container-apps.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @vmagelo
* Microsoft Alias: **v-gelorminom**",1.0,"Typo in last sentence under ""Scenario details"" - ""Containers easily other Azure resources like storage and database services.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fc9f55da-2d42-5ae9-9998-0088aa523884
* Version Independent ID: fc9f55da-2d42-5ae9-9998-0088aa523884
* Content: [Lift and shift to containers with Azure App Service - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/migrate-existing-applications-to-container-apps)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/migrate-existing-applications-to-container-apps.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/migrate-existing-applications-to-container-apps.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @vmagelo
* Microsoft Alias: **v-gelorminom**",1,typo in last sentence under scenario details containers easily other azure resources like storage and database services document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login vmagelo microsoft alias v gelorminom ,1
6283,14108217641.0,IssuesEvent,2020-11-06 17:27:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can you provide a Visio stencil set for download?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question triaged,"The SVG icons are great, but have to be inserted one at a time into Visio to use them. Could you provide a Visio stencil file with these icons for use in the desktop client?
Ideally Visio would have the ability to bulk import SVGs to create stencil files.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can you provide a Visio stencil set for download? - The SVG icons are great, but have to be inserted one at a time into Visio to use them. Could you provide a Visio stencil file with these icons for use in the desktop client?
Ideally Visio would have the ability to bulk import SVGs to create stencil files.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can you provide a visio stencil set for download the svg icons are great but have to be inserted one at a time into visio to use them could you provide a visio stencil file with these icons for use in the desktop client ideally visio would have the ability to bulk import svgs to create stencil files document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
3589,9855887401.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-19 20:34:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,What do you mean by real-time?,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged," It looks like the recommendation result is precomputed in batch and couldn't handle new users and new items to be recommended.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9353bd7c-c25d-5a4d-17cd-df6d8038d2a3
* Version Independent ID: 21434ad8-78fc-03e3-0bd1-03cc706627c7
* Content: [Build a Real-time Recommendation API on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"What do you mean by real-time? - It looks like the recommendation result is precomputed in batch and couldn't handle new users and new items to be recommended.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9353bd7c-c25d-5a4d-17cd-df6d8038d2a3
* Version Independent ID: 21434ad8-78fc-03e3-0bd1-03cc706627c7
* Content: [Build a Real-time Recommendation API on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,what do you mean by real time it looks like the recommendation result is precomputed in batch and couldn t handle new users and new items to be recommended document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login njray microsoft alias pnp ,1
6665,14998307385.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-29 18:13:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Out of date reference,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The Security Considerations section has link that points to a page that is no longer being maintained. Can this be updated?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Out of date reference - The Security Considerations section has link that points to a page that is no longer being maintained. Can this be updated?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,out of date reference the security considerations section has link that points to a page that is no longer being maintained can this be updated document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
7558,18244838700.0,IssuesEvent,2021-10-01 16:58:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Pricing tier doesn't match the subscription's billing model.,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc,"
Unable execute: `az deployment group create --resource-group hub-spoke \
--template-uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mspnp/samples/master/solutions/azure-hub-spoke/azuredeploy.json`
I get this error message:
```shell
$ az deployment group create --resource-group hub-spoke \
--template-uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mspnp/samples/master/solutions/azure-hub-spoke/azuredeploy.json
Please provide string value for 'adminUserName' (? for help): admin
Please provide securestring value for 'adminPassword' (? for help):
{""status"":""Failed"",""error"":{""code"":""DeploymentFailed"",""message"":""At least one resource deployment operation failed. Please list deployment operations for details. Please see https://aka.ms/DeployOperations for usage details."",""details"":[{""code"":""BadRequest"",""message"":""{\r\n \""error\"": {\r\n \""code\"": \""BadRequest\"",\r\n \""message\"": \""Pricing tier doesn't match the subscription's billing model. Read http://aka.ms/PricingTierWarning for more details.\"",\r\n \""target\"": \""PricingTier\""\r\n }\r\n}""}]}}
```
Note: I was given a ~$200 ""Visual Studio Enterprise Subscription""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Pricing tier doesn't match the subscription's billing model. -
Unable execute: `az deployment group create --resource-group hub-spoke \
--template-uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mspnp/samples/master/solutions/azure-hub-spoke/azuredeploy.json`
I get this error message:
```shell
$ az deployment group create --resource-group hub-spoke \
--template-uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mspnp/samples/master/solutions/azure-hub-spoke/azuredeploy.json
Please provide string value for 'adminUserName' (? for help): admin
Please provide securestring value for 'adminPassword' (? for help):
{""status"":""Failed"",""error"":{""code"":""DeploymentFailed"",""message"":""At least one resource deployment operation failed. Please list deployment operations for details. Please see https://aka.ms/DeployOperations for usage details."",""details"":[{""code"":""BadRequest"",""message"":""{\r\n \""error\"": {\r\n \""code\"": \""BadRequest\"",\r\n \""message\"": \""Pricing tier doesn't match the subscription's billing model. Read http://aka.ms/PricingTierWarning for more details.\"",\r\n \""target\"": \""PricingTier\""\r\n }\r\n}""}]}}
```
Note: I was given a ~$200 ""Visual Studio Enterprise Subscription""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,pricing tier doesn t match the subscription s billing model unable execute az deployment group create resource group hub spoke template uri i get this error message shell az deployment group create resource group hub spoke template uri please provide string value for adminusername for help admin please provide securestring value for adminpassword for help status failed error code deploymentfailed message at least one resource deployment operation failed please list deployment operations for details please see for usage details details note i was given a visual studio enterprise subscription document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9279,24331395143.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-30 19:47:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Confirm if MbPS should read MBps ,assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hi Microsoft team.
Under the following section of the document https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix?source=docs#performance-requirements
_**""For network bandwidth, depending on the type of utilization it is recommended to plan between 5 and 30 MbPS per user.""**_
Should MbPS read MBps
It's causing confusion, this is why I'm seeking clarification.
Best regards,
Ryan
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Confirm if MbPS should read MBps -
[Enter feedback here]
Hi Microsoft team.
Under the following section of the document https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix?source=docs#performance-requirements
_**""For network bandwidth, depending on the type of utilization it is recommended to plan between 5 and 30 MbPS per user.""**_
Should MbPS read MBps
It's causing confusion, this is why I'm seeking clarification.
Best regards,
Ryan
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,confirm if mbps should read mbps hi microsoft team under the following section of the document for network bandwidth depending on the type of utilization it is recommended to plan between and mbps per user should mbps read mbps it s causing confusion this is why i m seeking clarification best regards ryan document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afaf content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login christiaanbrinkhoff microsoft alias pnp ,1
5053,11996662772.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-08 17:09:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,All the links in the Next Steps sections show 404,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/traffic-manager-configure-failover-routing-method/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/site-recovery-components/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/site-recovery-network-design/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/storage-introduction/
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9d341ce9-13ab-a379-1af3-65390ce3b5e5
* Version Independent ID: e63d08d2-568a-9578-e8c0-74ff1584337b
* Content: [SMB disaster recovery with Azure Site Recovery - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-azure-site-recovery)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-azure-site-recovery.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-azure-site-recovery.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"All the links in the Next Steps sections show 404 - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/traffic-manager-configure-failover-routing-method/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/site-recovery-components/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/site-recovery-network-design/
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/storage-introduction/
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9d341ce9-13ab-a379-1af3-65390ce3b5e5
* Version Independent ID: e63d08d2-568a-9578-e8c0-74ff1584337b
* Content: [SMB disaster recovery with Azure Site Recovery - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-azure-site-recovery)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-azure-site-recovery.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-azure-site-recovery.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,all the links in the next steps sections show document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
6639,14973205522.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-28 00:32:12,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Sample diagram includes icons not in library,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"Although your sample diagram includes icons for (eg.) Azure Databricks and Power BI, neither of these are included in the current icon library. More frequent updates and more comprehensive coverage could still be an improvement.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Sample diagram includes icons not in library - Although your sample diagram includes icons for (eg.) Azure Databricks and Power BI, neither of these are included in the current icon library. More frequent updates and more comprehensive coverage could still be an improvement.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,sample diagram includes icons not in library although your sample diagram includes icons for eg azure databricks and power bi neither of these are included in the current icon library more frequent updates and more comprehensive coverage could still be an improvement document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6412,14526484068.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-14 14:16:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Consider Renaming the pattern,architecture-center/svc cxp design-pattern/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Hi
The original author of the pattern has renamed the pattern. Please see the notes at the bottom of his post that you reference: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/StranglerFigApplication.html
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5b580bcd-bba9-0799-6f9f-4b0e2ae9739f
* Version Independent ID: 6603e60e-ad3b-9aec-0633-eed88c218561
* Content: [Strangler pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/strangler)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/strangler.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/strangler.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Consider Renaming the pattern - Hi
The original author of the pattern has renamed the pattern. Please see the notes at the bottom of his post that you reference: https://martinfowler.com/bliki/StranglerFigApplication.html
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5b580bcd-bba9-0799-6f9f-4b0e2ae9739f
* Version Independent ID: 6603e60e-ad3b-9aec-0633-eed88c218561
* Content: [Strangler pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/strangler)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/strangler.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/strangler.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,consider renaming the pattern hi the original author of the pattern has renamed the pattern please see the notes at the bottom of his post that you reference document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9187,24183271845.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-23 10:56:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"The ""more scalable"" architecture seem incomplete. ",doc-bug in-progress assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
Hello, the following documentation seems incomplete to me.
How do we scale the Database to multiple regions? Read/Write to more than one region.
Redis is just one piece of the puzzle for the web session.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0086ec3a-1c25-966d-da07-7cf4258e187f
* Version Independent ID: f96d13e8-a5a2-b3c4-8c44-0d9e32a3ddf5
* Content: [Scalable Web Apps - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"The ""more scalable"" architecture seem incomplete. -
Hello, the following documentation seems incomplete to me.
How do we scale the Database to multiple regions? Read/Write to more than one region.
Redis is just one piece of the puzzle for the web session.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0086ec3a-1c25-966d-da07-7cf4258e187f
* Version Independent ID: f96d13e8-a5a2-b3c4-8c44-0d9e32a3ddf5
* Content: [Scalable Web Apps - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,the more scalable architecture seem incomplete hello the following documentation seems incomplete to me how do we scale the database to multiple regions read write to more than one region redis is just one piece of the puzzle for the web session document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10016,26019714891.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-21 11:32:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,App Gateway v2 compatibility unclear,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
Just looking for clarification - are all of these scenarios equally applicable to both App Gateway v1 and v2? Specifically, the docs for v2 indicate that support for UDRs isn't as complete as it is for v1 (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/configuration-infrastructure#supported-user-defined-routes) and the app gateway before firewall scenario seems to rely heavily on this.
Will all these scenarios work equally well with both app gateway SKUs?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall, App Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway#application-gateway-before-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1.0,"App Gateway v2 compatibility unclear -
Just looking for clarification - are all of these scenarios equally applicable to both App Gateway v1 and v2? Specifically, the docs for v2 indicate that support for UDRs isn't as complete as it is for v1 (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/configuration-infrastructure#supported-user-defined-routes) and the app gateway before firewall scenario seems to rely heavily on this.
Will all these scenarios work equally well with both app gateway SKUs?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall, App Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway#application-gateway-before-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1,app gateway compatibility unclear just looking for clarification are all of these scenarios equally applicable to both app gateway and specifically the docs for indicate that support for udrs isn t as complete as it is for and the app gateway before firewall scenario seems to rely heavily on this will all these scenarios work equally well with both app gateway skus thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login erjosito microsoft alias jomore ,1
10624,27167641560.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 16:33:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Images are blurry and not clear enough ,assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"The Images provided in the [doc](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/teams/securing-bot-teams-channel) are blurry we cannot even zoom and see it through clearly . Especially
[securing-bot-image-011.png](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/teams/media/securing-bot-image-011.png)
[securing-bot-image-010.png](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/teams/media/securing-bot-image-010.png)
[securing-bot-image-009.png](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/teams/media/securing-bot-image-009.png)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 62849df7-a49c-f17e-6876-c3da5954789a
* Version Independent ID: a412df8a-f876-d501-6aec-5bc1f010deaa
* Content: [Secure your Microsoft Teams channel bot and web app behind a firewall - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/teams/securing-bot-teams-channel)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/teams/securing-bot-teams-channel.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/teams/securing-bot-teams-channel.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @ajafry
* Microsoft Alias: **aljafry**",1.0,"Images are blurry and not clear enough - The Images provided in the [doc](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/teams/securing-bot-teams-channel) are blurry we cannot even zoom and see it through clearly . Especially
[securing-bot-image-011.png](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/teams/media/securing-bot-image-011.png)
[securing-bot-image-010.png](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/teams/media/securing-bot-image-010.png)
[securing-bot-image-009.png](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/teams/media/securing-bot-image-009.png)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 62849df7-a49c-f17e-6876-c3da5954789a
* Version Independent ID: a412df8a-f876-d501-6aec-5bc1f010deaa
* Content: [Secure your Microsoft Teams channel bot and web app behind a firewall - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/teams/securing-bot-teams-channel)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/teams/securing-bot-teams-channel.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/teams/securing-bot-teams-channel.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @ajafry
* Microsoft Alias: **aljafry**",1,images are blurry and not clear enough the images provided in the are blurry we cannot even zoom and see it through clearly especially document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login ajafry microsoft alias aljafry ,1
9795,25220536974.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-14 12:27:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Updated Azure Databricks icon,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks icon on [this diagram](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/_images/batch-scoring-spark.png) on the [Batch scoring of Spark models on Azure Databricks](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-databricks) architecture with this new SVG file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13z9cECUZsyu8ZjWzHErUZbAhuO_jXlUK/
Thank you,
Clinton Ford
Principal Product Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d2365cf7-ad8b-48ff-9f2b-836eafa55b2b
* Version Independent ID: d4095830-3dac-01e8-ea0b-120f5d37a525
* Content: [Batch scoring of Spark models on Azure Databricks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-databricks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-databricks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-databricks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Updated Azure Databricks icon - Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks icon on [this diagram](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/_images/batch-scoring-spark.png) on the [Batch scoring of Spark models on Azure Databricks](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-databricks) architecture with this new SVG file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13z9cECUZsyu8ZjWzHErUZbAhuO_jXlUK/
Thank you,
Clinton Ford
Principal Product Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d2365cf7-ad8b-48ff-9f2b-836eafa55b2b
* Version Independent ID: d4095830-3dac-01e8-ea0b-120f5d37a525
* Content: [Batch scoring of Spark models on Azure Databricks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-databricks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-databricks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-databricks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,updated azure databricks icon hi could you help me update the azure databricks icon on on the architecture with this new svg file thank you clinton ford
principal product marketing manager
databricks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login njray microsoft alias pnp ,1
6045,13542651206.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 17:41:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Need imementation steps,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"I would like to know implementation steps for this architecture thanks you.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e74d52e1-beaa-6f00-e0b6-2bbdd00cf830
* Version Independent ID: 94ad0a2e-1eac-eac8-11d8-c3b80f7ca6db
* Content: [Application integration using Event Grid - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/application-integration-using-event-grid)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/application-integration-using-event-grid.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/application-integration-using-event-grid.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Need imementation steps - I would like to know implementation steps for this architecture thanks you.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e74d52e1-beaa-6f00-e0b6-2bbdd00cf830
* Version Independent ID: 94ad0a2e-1eac-eac8-11d8-c3b80f7ca6db
* Content: [Application integration using Event Grid - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/application-integration-using-event-grid)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/application-integration-using-event-grid.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/application-integration-using-event-grid.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,need imementation steps i would like to know implementation steps for this architecture thanks you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id beaa version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6538,14826512263.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-15 00:09:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Updated Diagram with new Azure Databricks Logo,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement needs-art solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks logo on the [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics) reference architecture diagram? I have created an [updated architecture diagram image](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ij7lT4BKzMrOit3MlyGH7ySA1J6yWoL_/), using the [new Databricks icon](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QvtmjSvrRo8Y9T3aRR9e4RHmXMqqFihP/).
Thank you!
Clinton Ford
Staff Partner Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Updated Diagram with new Azure Databricks Logo - Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks logo on the [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics) reference architecture diagram? I have created an [updated architecture diagram image](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ij7lT4BKzMrOit3MlyGH7ySA1J6yWoL_/), using the [new Databricks icon](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QvtmjSvrRo8Y9T3aRR9e4RHmXMqqFihP/).
Thank you!
Clinton Ford
Staff Partner Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,updated diagram with new azure databricks logo hi could you help me update the azure databricks logo on the reference architecture diagram i have created an using the thank you clinton ford staff partner marketing manager databricks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4501,11234843626.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-09 06:38:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Always have backup for your critical resources,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Depend on the project we should always design backup for our critical resources. The resources will vary from project to project.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 64a14304-4ef8-dc1b-b92d-b021fc169710
* Version Independent ID: 33ad8550-7676-2b43-f6cc-a9eb3d3f2093
* Content: [Make all things redundant - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/design-principles/redundancy#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/design-principles/redundancy.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/design-principles/redundancy.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Always have backup for your critical resources - Depend on the project we should always design backup for our critical resources. The resources will vary from project to project.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 64a14304-4ef8-dc1b-b92d-b021fc169710
* Version Independent ID: 33ad8550-7676-2b43-f6cc-a9eb3d3f2093
* Content: [Make all things redundant - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/design-principles/redundancy#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/design-principles/redundancy.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/design-principles/redundancy.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,always have backup for your critical resources depend on the project we should always design backup for our critical resources the resources will vary from project to project document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
4513,11268153513.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-14 05:06:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,ASK cluster,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"I think there is a typo here: ""This option requires CNI networking to be enabled when you configure the ASK cluster..."". Isn't it AKS cluster instead?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/aks#api-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"ASK cluster - I think there is a typo here: ""This option requires CNI networking to be enabled when you configure the ASK cluster..."". Isn't it AKS cluster instead?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/aks#api-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,ask cluster i think there is a typo here this option requires cni networking to be enabled when you configure the ask cluster isn t it aks cluster instead document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9673,25017931408.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:38:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio file not up to date with current schema,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hi
The current schema is not taken into account in the referred Visio file. in fact the represented schema has nothing to do with what I found in the Visio file.
Next to it: the schema is very small and it is not possible to make it larger. Normally it is possible to click on a schema and then you get it full screen but here that is not implemented. Schema is hard to read at this size.
Thanks for taking into account
Roger
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",2.0,"Visio file not up to date with current schema -
[Enter feedback here]
Hi
The current schema is not taken into account in the referred Visio file. in fact the represented schema has nothing to do with what I found in the Visio file.
Next to it: the schema is very small and it is not possible to make it larger. Normally it is possible to click on a schema and then you get it full screen but here that is not implemented. Schema is hard to read at this size.
Thanks for taking into account
Roger
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,visio file not up to date with current schema hi the current schema is not taken into account in the referred visio file in fact the represented schema has nothing to do with what i found in the visio file next to it the schema is very small and it is not possible to make it larger normally it is possible to click on a schema and then you get it full screen but here that is not implemented schema is hard to read at this size thanks for taking into account roger document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
10470,26995312787.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-10 00:10:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Page content and title has (almost) nothing to do with each other,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"This page titled ""Custom data sovereignty and data gravity requirements"" does not contain anything about said title. The architecture drawing and description sounds like a placeholder for something else.
Seems to me like the page should be added to have something useful or removed until content can be created.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3bf8eba9-9491-d76d-9690-151add45b30b
* Version Independent ID: b64f53cb-1421-050b-ec5c-b42ef49e7c86
* Content: [Custom data sovereignty and data gravity requirements - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/data-sovereignty-and-gravity)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/data-sovereignty-and-gravity.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/data-sovereignty-and-gravity.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Page content and title has (almost) nothing to do with each other - This page titled ""Custom data sovereignty and data gravity requirements"" does not contain anything about said title. The architecture drawing and description sounds like a placeholder for something else.
Seems to me like the page should be added to have something useful or removed until content can be created.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3bf8eba9-9491-d76d-9690-151add45b30b
* Version Independent ID: b64f53cb-1421-050b-ec5c-b42ef49e7c86
* Content: [Custom data sovereignty and data gravity requirements - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/data-sovereignty-and-gravity)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/data-sovereignty-and-gravity.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/data-sovereignty-and-gravity.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,page content and title has almost nothing to do with each other this page titled custom data sovereignty and data gravity requirements does not contain anything about said title the architecture drawing and description sounds like a placeholder for something else seems to me like the page should be added to have something useful or removed until content can be created document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
7172,16903314808.0,IssuesEvent,2021-06-24 02:05:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""API Gateway"" is referenced but that isnt an azure servivce",architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author azure-guide/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Shouldn't this wording either say ""API Management"" or maybe ""Application Gateway"" or make a note/link to the https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/gateway document and say that it could be any number of technologies....the impression to me is that there is an azure service called 'API Gateway'
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fccd14ec-192a-ffd8-edec-4296998feb8b
* Version Independent ID: 2bac3769-2613-f739-4796-0737c7cd8919
* Content: [Building microservices on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"""API Gateway"" is referenced but that isnt an azure servivce - Shouldn't this wording either say ""API Management"" or maybe ""Application Gateway"" or make a note/link to the https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/gateway document and say that it could be any number of technologies....the impression to me is that there is an azure service called 'API Gateway'
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fccd14ec-192a-ffd8-edec-4296998feb8b
* Version Independent ID: 2bac3769-2613-f739-4796-0737c7cd8919
* Content: [Building microservices on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, api gateway is referenced but that isnt an azure servivce shouldn t this wording either say api management or maybe application gateway or make a note link to the document and say that it could be any number of technologies the impression to me is that there is an azure service called api gateway document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id edec version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
3458,9652321012.0,IssuesEvent,2019-05-18 16:08:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Triggered Webjobs Deployment,architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp product-question triaged,"The doc states ""If you want the job to respond to an event-driven trigger, you should configure it as Run continuously. The script or program is stored in the folder named site/wwwroot/app_data/jobs/continuous.""
Is this correct? When I used the portal to create a Triggered type WebJob with a manual trigger it was placed in site/wwwroot/app_data/jobs/triggered
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Triggered Webjobs Deployment - The doc states ""If you want the job to respond to an event-driven trigger, you should configure it as Run continuously. The script or program is stored in the folder named site/wwwroot/app_data/jobs/continuous.""
Is this correct? When I used the portal to create a Triggered type WebJob with a manual trigger it was placed in site/wwwroot/app_data/jobs/triggered
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,triggered webjobs deployment the doc states if you want the job to respond to an event driven trigger you should configure it as run continuously the script or program is stored in the folder named site wwwroot app data jobs continuous is this correct when i used the portal to create a triggered type webjob with a manual trigger it was placed in site wwwroot app data jobs triggered document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id dcef content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9081,24036582812.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 19:48:13,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Broken nav link ""Secure access to IoT apps with Azure AD""",assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Left nav broken link: Secure access to IoT apps with Azure AD
Used to point to this page (found on web archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20200825221210/https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot-aad/iot-aad
Please fix link (to original source on docs.microsoft.com obviously not web archive).
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/iot.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Broken nav link ""Secure access to IoT apps with Azure AD"" - Left nav broken link: Secure access to IoT apps with Azure AD
Used to point to this page (found on web archive): https://web.archive.org/web/20200825221210/https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot-aad/iot-aad
Please fix link (to original source on docs.microsoft.com obviously not web archive).
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/iot.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,broken nav link secure access to iot apps with azure ad left nav broken link secure access to iot apps with azure ad used to point to this page found on web archive please fix link to original source on docs microsoft com obviously not web archive document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9434,24587127541.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-13 20:50:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Translation for this page is missing,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"This page is not translated in any language. Only the original English text is available.
---
#### Dokumentdetails
⚠ *Bearbeiten Sie diesen Abschnitt nicht. Er ist für die Verknüpfung von docs.microsoft.com zum GitHub-Artikel erforderlich.*
* ID: fbbf8259-fef9-b02b-0b56-e24f95e04c6a
* Version Independent ID: 3d639f35-e1cd-caba-e8ba-4e778ad523b4
* Content: [Azure Automation State Configuration - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/de-de/azure/architecture/example-scenario/state-configuration/state-configuration?tabs=cli%2Cwindows)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/state-configuration/state-configuration.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/state-configuration/state-configuration.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @neilpeterson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Translation for this page is missing - This page is not translated in any language. Only the original English text is available.
---
#### Dokumentdetails
⚠ *Bearbeiten Sie diesen Abschnitt nicht. Er ist für die Verknüpfung von docs.microsoft.com zum GitHub-Artikel erforderlich.*
* ID: fbbf8259-fef9-b02b-0b56-e24f95e04c6a
* Version Independent ID: 3d639f35-e1cd-caba-e8ba-4e778ad523b4
* Content: [Azure Automation State Configuration - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/de-de/azure/architecture/example-scenario/state-configuration/state-configuration?tabs=cli%2Cwindows)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/state-configuration/state-configuration.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/state-configuration/state-configuration.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @neilpeterson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,translation for this page is missing this page is not translated in any language only the original english text is available dokumentdetails ⚠ bearbeiten sie diesen abschnitt nicht er ist für die verknüpfung von docs microsoft com zum github artikel erforderlich id version independent id caba content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login neilpeterson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9118,24055282859.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 16:14:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,how to handle message from service bus queue via apim,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"I don't know if there any solution of it, but here is my problem.
Working solution
1) I can push the queue from my application by ServiceBusClient and ServiceBusMessage
2) I can read the message via ServiceBusProcessor
but problems begin, if I want put service bus behind APIM, how can I use ServiceBusProcessor? please help me if there any work-around.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 02e8312a-a2b2-c683-2bc5-ebadf37cfbfe
* Version Independent ID: 23ab5226-f35d-cb04-109d-a4e651785f8d
* Content: [Publisher-Subscriber pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/publisher-subscriber)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/publisher-subscriber.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/publisher-subscriber.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @alexbuckgit
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"how to handle message from service bus queue via apim - I don't know if there any solution of it, but here is my problem.
Working solution
1) I can push the queue from my application by ServiceBusClient and ServiceBusMessage
2) I can read the message via ServiceBusProcessor
but problems begin, if I want put service bus behind APIM, how can I use ServiceBusProcessor? please help me if there any work-around.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 02e8312a-a2b2-c683-2bc5-ebadf37cfbfe
* Version Independent ID: 23ab5226-f35d-cb04-109d-a4e651785f8d
* Content: [Publisher-Subscriber pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/publisher-subscriber)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/publisher-subscriber.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/publisher-subscriber.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @alexbuckgit
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,how to handle message from service bus queue via apim i don t know if there any solution of it but here is my problem working solution i can push the queue from my application by servicebusclient and servicebusmessage i can read the message via servicebusprocessor but problems begin if i want put service bus behind apim how can i use servicebusprocessor please help me if there any work around document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login alexbuckgit microsoft alias pnp ,1
4535,11302325483.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-17 17:24:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,documentation folder missing in git repo,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc product-question triaged,"Was the docs/framework/devops/iac.md removed from git?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5490ef64-9b6d-59be-1e9b-a2b2d10388b2
* Version Independent ID: 4e37976c-47f3-1481-b312-e7be38f93e07
* Content: [Infrastructure Deployment](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/iac#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/iac.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/iac.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @Jose-Moreno
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"documentation folder missing in git repo - Was the docs/framework/devops/iac.md removed from git?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5490ef64-9b6d-59be-1e9b-a2b2d10388b2
* Version Independent ID: 4e37976c-47f3-1481-b312-e7be38f93e07
* Content: [Infrastructure Deployment](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/iac#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/iac.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/iac.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @Jose-Moreno
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,documentation folder missing in git repo was the docs framework devops iac md removed from git document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login jose moreno microsoft alias pnp ,1
10682,27289859892.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-23 15:53:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,script not working,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"The script above does not actually work in most circumstances. I've made a new version that correctly rebuilds peerings and also handles multiple peerings on a network, and can hence be used on the hub of a hub and spoke network.
Feel free to clean up the
[add-addrspacewithpeering.txt](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/files/7227980/add-addrspacewithpeering.txt)
code... I'm not an expert with powershell.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"script not working - The script above does not actually work in most circumstances. I've made a new version that correctly rebuilds peerings and also handles multiple peerings on a network, and can hence be used on the hub of a hub and spoke network.
Feel free to clean up the
[add-addrspacewithpeering.txt](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/files/7227980/add-addrspacewithpeering.txt)
code... I'm not an expert with powershell.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,script not working the script above does not actually work in most circumstances i ve made a new version that correctly rebuilds peerings and also handles multiple peerings on a network and can hence be used on the hub of a hub and spoke network feel free to clean up the code i m not an expert with powershell document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login randycampbell microsoft alias pnp ,1
10685,27297125668.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-23 21:24:13,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Azure Nov. 2022 icon is not up to date, are missing : ASA, ACA, ARO, Fleet",doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"
[https://arch-center.azureedge.net/icons/Azure_Public_Service_Icons_V10.zip](https://arch-center.azureedge.net/icons/Azure_Public_Service_Icons_V10.zip) Nov. 2022 is not up to date :
- compute/10370-icon-service-Azure-Spring-Cloud.svg should be renamed Azure Spring Apps, see [https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/95119](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/95119)
- Azure Container Apps icon should be added to Icons\containers
- Azure RedHat OpenShift icon should be added to Icons\containers
- [Azure Kubernetes Fleet Manager](https://azure.microsoft.com/products/kubernetes-fleet-manager/) icon should be added to Icons\containers
- ACA Env. is hidden at new icons\02989-icon-service-Container-App-Environments.svg
- There is 10024-icon-service-Mesh-Applications.svg wheras Open Service Mesh OSM icon should be added
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1.0,"Azure Nov. 2022 icon is not up to date, are missing : ASA, ACA, ARO, Fleet -
[https://arch-center.azureedge.net/icons/Azure_Public_Service_Icons_V10.zip](https://arch-center.azureedge.net/icons/Azure_Public_Service_Icons_V10.zip) Nov. 2022 is not up to date :
- compute/10370-icon-service-Azure-Spring-Cloud.svg should be renamed Azure Spring Apps, see [https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/95119](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/95119)
- Azure Container Apps icon should be added to Icons\containers
- Azure RedHat OpenShift icon should be added to Icons\containers
- [Azure Kubernetes Fleet Manager](https://azure.microsoft.com/products/kubernetes-fleet-manager/) icon should be added to Icons\containers
- ACA Env. is hidden at new icons\02989-icon-service-Container-App-Environments.svg
- There is 10024-icon-service-Mesh-Applications.svg wheras Open Service Mesh OSM icon should be added
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1,azure nov icon is not up to date are missing asa aca aro fleet nov is not up to date compute icon service azure spring cloud svg should be renamed azure spring apps see azure container apps icon should be added to icons containers azure redhat openshift icon should be added to icons containers icon should be added to icons containers aca env is hidden at new icons icon service container app environments svg there is icon service mesh applications svg wheras open service mesh osm icon should be added document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login robbagby microsoft alias robbag ,1
10466,26992895237.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-09 21:31:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Conatiner Apps are not in Preview any more,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
Container Apps are mentioned as Preview which is not the case.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6244cf08-ed10-93fd-de01-56044cada33e
* Version Independent ID: 6244cf08-ed10-93fd-de01-56044cada33e
* Content: [Deploy microservices with Azure Container Apps and Dapr - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/serverless/microservices-with-container-apps-dapr?source=docs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/serverless/microservices-with-container-apps-dapr.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/serverless/microservices-with-container-apps-dapr.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @alicejgibbons
* Microsoft Alias: **algibbon**",1.0,"Conatiner Apps are not in Preview any more -
Container Apps are mentioned as Preview which is not the case.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6244cf08-ed10-93fd-de01-56044cada33e
* Version Independent ID: 6244cf08-ed10-93fd-de01-56044cada33e
* Content: [Deploy microservices with Azure Container Apps and Dapr - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/serverless/microservices-with-container-apps-dapr?source=docs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/serverless/microservices-with-container-apps-dapr.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/serverless/microservices-with-container-apps-dapr.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @alicejgibbons
* Microsoft Alias: **algibbon**",1,conatiner apps are not in preview any more container apps are mentioned as preview which is not the case document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login alicejgibbons microsoft alias algibbon ,1
10742,27374461465.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-28 04:00:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Platform Types not listed,cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc resolved,"Under Platform Types, the options in the table are:
+ AnyPlatform
+ iOS
+ Android
+ WindowsPhone
+ macOS
+ iOSAndroid
+ Unknown
However in the CAP list there is
+ Android
+ iOS
+ Windows Phone
+ Windows
+ MacOS
+ Linux
+ + Any Device
+ + Any Platform
I advise amending the table to include Windows and Linux.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Version Independent ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Content: [Conditional Access framework and policies - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/security/conditional-access-framework)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @clajes
* Microsoft Alias: **clajes**",1.0,"Platform Types not listed - Under Platform Types, the options in the table are:
+ AnyPlatform
+ iOS
+ Android
+ WindowsPhone
+ macOS
+ iOSAndroid
+ Unknown
However in the CAP list there is
+ Android
+ iOS
+ Windows Phone
+ Windows
+ MacOS
+ Linux
+ + Any Device
+ + Any Platform
I advise amending the table to include Windows and Linux.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Version Independent ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Content: [Conditional Access framework and policies - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/security/conditional-access-framework)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @clajes
* Microsoft Alias: **clajes**",1,platform types not listed under platform types the options in the table are anyplatform ios android windowsphone macos iosandroid unknown however in the cap list there is android ios windows phone windows macos linux any device any platform i advise amending the table to include windows and linux document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login clajes microsoft alias clajes ,1
7729,18990145969.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-22 05:49:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"article date missing, no definition of Ethereum PoA and no mention on deprecation",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc,"The article is not dated.
There is no definition of PoA in Ethereum context.
And unclear whether the deprecation is already active
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e3f6b2cc-f78e-7b52-24f0-3d16bdfb2e1b
* Version Independent ID: 4c8a4727-ef28-d68c-2c1f-df3b9fb904ac
* Content: [Decentralized trust between banks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/decentralized-trust)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/decentralized-trust.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/decentralized-trust.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @vitoc
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"article date missing, no definition of Ethereum PoA and no mention on deprecation - The article is not dated.
There is no definition of PoA in Ethereum context.
And unclear whether the deprecation is already active
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e3f6b2cc-f78e-7b52-24f0-3d16bdfb2e1b
* Version Independent ID: 4c8a4727-ef28-d68c-2c1f-df3b9fb904ac
* Content: [Decentralized trust between banks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/decentralized-trust)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/decentralized-trust.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/decentralized-trust.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @vitoc
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,article date missing no definition of ethereum poa and no mention on deprecation the article is not dated there is no definition of poa in ethereum context and unclear whether the deprecation is already active document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login vitoc microsoft alias pnp ,1
9407,24538549848.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-11 23:56:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Teams exclusions - Format for redirections.xml,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Please provide the https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions in the format of https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/fslogix/manage-profile-content-cncpt#structure-of-redirectionsxml-file
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Teams exclusions - Format for redirections.xml - Please provide the https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions in the format of https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/fslogix/manage-profile-content-cncpt#structure-of-redirectionsxml-file
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,teams exclusions format for redirections xml please provide the in the format of document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afaf content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login christiaanbrinkhoff microsoft alias pnp ,1
5580,12745337558.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-26 14:05:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Diagram for Service choice needs some correction,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Feedback for the diagram under section ""Choose a candidate service"":
Path: Start -> Migrate -> Lift-and-Shift -> Can be Containerized (Yes) -> Needs full-fledged orchestration? (No)
Shouldn't this be a ""Container Instance"" service?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Diagram for Service choice needs some correction - Feedback for the diagram under section ""Choose a candidate service"":
Path: Start -> Migrate -> Lift-and-Shift -> Can be Containerized (Yes) -> Needs full-fledged orchestration? (No)
Shouldn't this be a ""Container Instance"" service?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,diagram for service choice needs some correction feedback for the diagram under section choose a candidate service path start migrate lift and shift can be containerized yes needs full fledged orchestration no shouldn t this be a container instance service document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9568,24840215539.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-26 12:09:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Grammatical error in Related resources section,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
There is a grammatical error in the highlighted sentence, which makes the description unclear.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Grammatical error in Related resources section -
There is a grammatical error in the highlighted sentence, which makes the description unclear.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,grammatical error in related resources section there is a grammatical error in the highlighted sentence which makes the description unclear document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
4991,11942105510.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 19:39:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Sync Admin Accounts,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Hi,
please provide more details for the section: Don’t synchronize on-premises admin accounts to cloud identity providers
Is your point to grant admin roles in AAD only to cloud-only accounts?
AFAIK the managemant of administrative rights in AD and AAD are separated and from the perspective of the AAD a domain admin is a ""normal account"". Where is the path for the privilege escalation?
And please describe how AADC prevents the sync by default. In my experience Domain Admins are synced but you get an error message in the logs for the writeback of the ms-ds-consistencyGUID.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: def43e94-5049-5848-e385-dda52e7bd3dc
* Version Independent ID: 32cea313-ec24-f5b2-02bf-3cbe5a355a13
* Content: [Identity and Access Management in Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/security/identity?WT.mc_id=none-twitter-tajanca#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/security/identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/security/identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Sync Admin Accounts - Hi,
please provide more details for the section: Don’t synchronize on-premises admin accounts to cloud identity providers
Is your point to grant admin roles in AAD only to cloud-only accounts?
AFAIK the managemant of administrative rights in AD and AAD are separated and from the perspective of the AAD a domain admin is a ""normal account"". Where is the path for the privilege escalation?
And please describe how AADC prevents the sync by default. In my experience Domain Admins are synced but you get an error message in the logs for the writeback of the ms-ds-consistencyGUID.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: def43e94-5049-5848-e385-dda52e7bd3dc
* Version Independent ID: 32cea313-ec24-f5b2-02bf-3cbe5a355a13
* Content: [Identity and Access Management in Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/security/identity?WT.mc_id=none-twitter-tajanca#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/security/identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/security/identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,sync admin accounts hi please provide more details for the section don’t synchronize on premises admin accounts to cloud identity providers is your point to grant admin roles in aad only to cloud only accounts afaik the managemant of administrative rights in ad and aad are separated and from the perspective of the aad a domain admin is a normal account where is the path for the privilege escalation and please describe how aadc prevents the sync by default in my experience domain admins are synced but you get an error message in the logs for the writeback of the ms ds consistencyguid document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
7292,17359543330.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-29 18:31:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"This script requires a preview feature ""Microsoft.Network/AllowMultipleAddressPrefixesOnSubnet""",Pri3 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"It's because of this section of the script that realistically isn't needed as we shouldn't be trying to add the vnet address space as a prefix to the existing subnets:
#Add $IPAddressRange to subnet
$subnet = $HUBvnet.subnets[0]
$subnet.addressprefix.add($IPAddressRange)
#end
Please update the script to remove this section.",1.0,"This script requires a preview feature ""Microsoft.Network/AllowMultipleAddressPrefixesOnSubnet"" - It's because of this section of the script that realistically isn't needed as we shouldn't be trying to add the vnet address space as a prefix to the existing subnets:
#Add $IPAddressRange to subnet
$subnet = $HUBvnet.subnets[0]
$subnet.addressprefix.add($IPAddressRange)
#end
Please update the script to remove this section.",1,this script requires a preview feature microsoft network allowmultipleaddressprefixesonsubnet it s because of this section of the script that realistically isn t needed as we shouldn t be trying to add the vnet address space as a prefix to the existing subnets add ipaddressrange to subnet subnet hubvnet subnets subnet addressprefix add ipaddressrange end please update the script to remove this section ,1
8280,21795846081.0,IssuesEvent,2022-05-15 16:10:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,My feedback,cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
This learing plateform is really good and helpfull for all.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"My feedback -
[Enter feedback here]
This learing plateform is really good and helpfull for all.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,my feedback this learing plateform is really good and helpfull for all document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
11405,30349367554.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-11 17:42:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,PowerPoint find need extra permission after download ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Architecture PowerPoint file that mentioned for download needed extra permission after download!
https://arch-center.azureedge.net/conversation-summarization-overview.pptx
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa815b05-e4be-75fd-04bb-9136b6228502
* Version Independent ID: aa815b05-e4be-75fd-04bb-9136b6228502
* Content: [Conversation summarization - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/conversation-summarization)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/ai/conversation-summarization.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/ai/conversation-summarization.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @mejani
* Microsoft Alias: **mejani**",1.0,"PowerPoint find need extra permission after download - Architecture PowerPoint file that mentioned for download needed extra permission after download!
https://arch-center.azureedge.net/conversation-summarization-overview.pptx
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa815b05-e4be-75fd-04bb-9136b6228502
* Version Independent ID: aa815b05-e4be-75fd-04bb-9136b6228502
* Content: [Conversation summarization - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/conversation-summarization)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/ai/conversation-summarization.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/ai/conversation-summarization.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @mejani
* Microsoft Alias: **mejani**",1,powerpoint find need extra permission after download architecture powerpoint file that mentioned for download needed extra permission after download document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login mejani microsoft alias mejani ,1
5390,12423394466.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-24 05:15:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Updated Articles links return 404 error,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"Clicking any of the ""New Article"" or ""Updated Articles"" links on this page result in 404 errors.
Tried Edge Chromium and Google Chrome on Windows 10 and Chrome on Android.
Navigating to other pages in the Architecture centre seem to be fine.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in the Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/changelog#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Updated Articles links return 404 error - Clicking any of the ""New Article"" or ""Updated Articles"" links on this page result in 404 errors.
Tried Edge Chromium and Google Chrome on Windows 10 and Chrome on Android.
Navigating to other pages in the Architecture centre seem to be fine.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in the Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/changelog#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,updated articles links return error clicking any of the new article or updated articles links on this page result in errors tried edge chromium and google chrome on windows and chrome on android navigating to other pages in the architecture centre seem to be fine document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5555,12700098047.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 15:48:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Include Azure Data Explorer in this ref article,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"The diagram is a good representation of a generic IoT reference architecture. Please include links to the Azure Data Explorer documentation and add recommendations for an alternate option as a warm store. If you have any questions, please reach out to me.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8b30c2a4-8c2c-d041-b7a6-2766b9aa9bb6
* Version Independent ID: 2cdc5376-7817-7f86-41c1-7ee492833eda
* Content: [IoT Architecture – Azure IoT Subsystems - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/azure-iot-subsystems#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/azure-iot-subsystems.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/azure-iot-subsystems.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Include Azure Data Explorer in this ref article - The diagram is a good representation of a generic IoT reference architecture. Please include links to the Azure Data Explorer documentation and add recommendations for an alternate option as a warm store. If you have any questions, please reach out to me.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8b30c2a4-8c2c-d041-b7a6-2766b9aa9bb6
* Version Independent ID: 2cdc5376-7817-7f86-41c1-7ee492833eda
* Content: [IoT Architecture – Azure IoT Subsystems - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/azure-iot-subsystems#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/azure-iot-subsystems.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/azure-iot-subsystems.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,include azure data explorer in this ref article the diagram is a good representation of a generic iot reference architecture please include links to the azure data explorer documentation and add recommendations for an alternate option as a warm store if you have any questions please reach out to me document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
7727,18990077196.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-22 05:40:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Protocol and client options - RDSTLS vs PKU2U ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
The ""Protocol and client options"" is somewhat confusing and suggest breaking into two sections
First section RDSTLS protocol, as this handles the wider number of clients and does not require local computer to domain joined to the same tenant as the AVD session host, which I think norm. User on personal or organisation 'A' device connecting to organisation 'B' AVD infrastructure.
Second section PKU2U protocol, as this will only work with Windows Azure Virtual Desktop client and requires both local computer and session host to be domain joined to the same tenant.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Version Independent ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Content: [Azure AD join for Azure Virtual Desktop - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1.0,"Protocol and client options - RDSTLS vs PKU2U -
The ""Protocol and client options"" is somewhat confusing and suggest breaking into two sections
First section RDSTLS protocol, as this handles the wider number of clients and does not require local computer to domain joined to the same tenant as the AVD session host, which I think norm. User on personal or organisation 'A' device connecting to organisation 'B' AVD infrastructure.
Second section PKU2U protocol, as this will only work with Windows Azure Virtual Desktop client and requires both local computer and session host to be domain joined to the same tenant.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Version Independent ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Content: [Azure AD join for Azure Virtual Desktop - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1,protocol and client options rdstls vs the protocol and client options is somewhat confusing and suggest breaking into two sections first section rdstls protocol as this handles the wider number of clients and does not require local computer to domain joined to the same tenant as the avd session host which i think norm user on personal or organisation a device connecting to organisation b avd infrastructure second section protocol as this will only work with windows azure virtual desktop client and requires both local computer and session host to be domain joined to the same tenant document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login tomhickling microsoft alias thhickli ,1
9225,24255613043.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 17:30:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,No mention of testing tools,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"
The title of the page is ""Testing tools"" but I see no mention of any testing tools on the page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c67eba0-d85b-56e6-35bb-841a98cd1e38
* Version Independent ID: c2c66e14-b4c4-c3a4-343d-3e512d30a088
* Content: [Testing tools - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/scalability/test-tools)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/scalability/test-tools.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/scalability/test-tools.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-aangie
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"No mention of testing tools -
The title of the page is ""Testing tools"" but I see no mention of any testing tools on the page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c67eba0-d85b-56e6-35bb-841a98cd1e38
* Version Independent ID: c2c66e14-b4c4-c3a4-343d-3e512d30a088
* Content: [Testing tools - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/scalability/test-tools)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/scalability/test-tools.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/scalability/test-tools.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-aangie
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,no mention of testing tools the title of the page is testing tools but i see no mention of any testing tools on the page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login v aangie microsoft alias pnp ,1
3877,10239337625.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:00:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Improve SQL Server resiliency,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement needs-art triaged,"Even with Active/Passive this would not be an automatic fail-over since you would have to change the secondary database to allow writes. Consider changing the diagram to show the use of a SQL endpoint - this is more resilient as would failover to the secondary in the case of the SQL Server going down as well as the entire data centre
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Improve SQL Server resiliency - Even with Active/Passive this would not be an automatic fail-over since you would have to change the secondary database to allow writes. Consider changing the diagram to show the use of a SQL endpoint - this is more resilient as would failover to the secondary in the case of the SQL Server going down as well as the entire data centre
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,improve sql server resiliency even with active passive this would not be an automatic fail over since you would have to change the secondary database to allow writes consider changing the diagram to show the use of a sql endpoint this is more resilient as would failover to the secondary in the case of the sql server going down as well as the entire data centre document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10410,26943691990.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-08 05:46:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Unclear description,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
""Azure Synapse Analytics, Azure Data Explorer, HBase, Spark, or Hive. Processed real-time data can be stored in a relational database **such** Synapse Analytics, Azure Data Explorer, a NoSQL store such as HBase, or as files in distributed storage over which Spark or Hive tables can be defined and queried.""
There is probably an error here. Maybe ""by"" should be in place of ""such""? Still, the phrase is not clear.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 830e1782-9caa-3533-10a0-85a3d4483d24
* Version Independent ID: d66583fa-188c-9dce-b6fd-84b34c0bf315
* Content: [Real-time processing - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Unclear description -
""Azure Synapse Analytics, Azure Data Explorer, HBase, Spark, or Hive. Processed real-time data can be stored in a relational database **such** Synapse Analytics, Azure Data Explorer, a NoSQL store such as HBase, or as files in distributed storage over which Spark or Hive tables can be defined and queried.""
There is probably an error here. Maybe ""by"" should be in place of ""such""? Still, the phrase is not clear.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 830e1782-9caa-3533-10a0-85a3d4483d24
* Version Independent ID: d66583fa-188c-9dce-b6fd-84b34c0bf315
* Content: [Real-time processing - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,unclear description azure synapse analytics azure data explorer hbase spark or hive processed real time data can be stored in a relational database such synapse analytics azure data explorer a nosql store such as hbase or as files in distributed storage over which spark or hive tables can be defined and queried there is probably an error here maybe by should be in place of such still the phrase is not clear document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
9478,24653118079.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-17 20:27:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Benefit to this approach vs Azure Monitor,assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
Is there a particular scenario this guidance seeks to address? If so, that would be good to call out.
It's not clear what the benefit to this approach is compared to using existing Azure Monitor capabilities. For example, with the introduction of workspace-based App Insights resources, the assertion that 'consolidating multiple applications into a single workspace is a challenge' seems a bit out of date.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 68db9a0c-2b6a-c5aa-5fcc-428ae4cbce7b
* Version Independent ID: 68db9a0c-2b6a-c5aa-5fcc-428ae4cbce7b
* Content: [Enterprise-grade logging on Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/logging/enterprise-grade-logging)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/logging/enterprise-grade-logging.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/logging/enterprise-grade-logging.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @yemrea
* Microsoft Alias: **yemrea**",2.0,"Benefit to this approach vs Azure Monitor -
Is there a particular scenario this guidance seeks to address? If so, that would be good to call out.
It's not clear what the benefit to this approach is compared to using existing Azure Monitor capabilities. For example, with the introduction of workspace-based App Insights resources, the assertion that 'consolidating multiple applications into a single workspace is a challenge' seems a bit out of date.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 68db9a0c-2b6a-c5aa-5fcc-428ae4cbce7b
* Version Independent ID: 68db9a0c-2b6a-c5aa-5fcc-428ae4cbce7b
* Content: [Enterprise-grade logging on Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/logging/enterprise-grade-logging)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/logging/enterprise-grade-logging.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/logging/enterprise-grade-logging.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @yemrea
* Microsoft Alias: **yemrea**",1,benefit to this approach vs azure monitor is there a particular scenario this guidance seeks to address if so that would be good to call out it s not clear what the benefit to this approach is compared to using existing azure monitor capabilities for example with the introduction of workspace based app insights resources the assertion that consolidating multiple applications into a single workspace is a challenge seems a bit out of date document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login yemrea microsoft alias yemrea ,1
10161,26420906638.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-13 20:22:01,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Updated article titles - visible codes,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"The updated article tiles display some codes from GitHub, this is not helpful and does not look good. It would be nice if those could be hidden.
Also, I notice that many of the pages are not showing the date they were updated. Most of the other Docs pages do show that information, which is very helpful. Please fix the publishing process so that the Update Date for the well architected framework pages is visible.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @alexhart11
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Updated article titles - visible codes - The updated article tiles display some codes from GitHub, this is not helpful and does not look good. It would be nice if those could be hidden.
Also, I notice that many of the pages are not showing the date they were updated. Most of the other Docs pages do show that information, which is very helpful. Please fix the publishing process so that the Update Date for the well architected framework pages is visible.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @alexhart11
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,updated article titles visible codes the updated article tiles display some codes from github this is not helpful and does not look good it would be nice if those could be hidden also i notice that many of the pages are not showing the date they were updated most of the other docs pages do show that information which is very helpful please fix the publishing process so that the update date for the well architected framework pages is visible document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10335,26793115952.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-01 09:57:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing Azure Icon,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"
Please add the icon for Azure Monitor Private Link Service!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing Azure Icon -
Please add the icon for Azure Monitor Private Link Service!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing azure icon please add the icon for azure monitor private link service document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
5551,12699576200.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 15:03:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio download link does not match the article diagram,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
The visio file download link in this article does not match the diagram displayed in the article.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87139748-938e-638e-de1f-94f8becfe1da
* Version Independent ID: b96371e6-defb-3e70-792a-2c0cfdc25b7d
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Visio download link does not match the article diagram -
[Enter feedback here]
The visio file download link in this article does not match the diagram displayed in the article.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87139748-938e-638e-de1f-94f8becfe1da
* Version Independent ID: b96371e6-defb-3e70-792a-2c0cfdc25b7d
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio download link does not match the article diagram the visio file download link in this article does not match the diagram displayed in the article document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id defb content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9150,24096309335.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-19 19:05:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Bounded Context,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
I think it is important to call out that an entity can represent itself differently to different Bounded Context. For example, the entity Drone will expose different details for Drone Management than for Drone Booking.
The article tries to do that but the nuance of, ""an entity representing itself differently for different contexts"" is missed - hence suggesting that it be called out explicitly. OR link to another page that exemplifies how same entity might appear in different contexts (e.g., Martin Fowler's version).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e55d3a73-7618-45ba-b281-bb70dd258842
* Version Independent ID: 7f5cd352-0998-a214-8dfc-c19898cecd21
* Content: [Domain analysis for microservices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/model/domain-analysis)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/model/domain-analysis.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/model/domain-analysis.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Bounded Context -
I think it is important to call out that an entity can represent itself differently to different Bounded Context. For example, the entity Drone will expose different details for Drone Management than for Drone Booking.
The article tries to do that but the nuance of, ""an entity representing itself differently for different contexts"" is missed - hence suggesting that it be called out explicitly. OR link to another page that exemplifies how same entity might appear in different contexts (e.g., Martin Fowler's version).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e55d3a73-7618-45ba-b281-bb70dd258842
* Version Independent ID: 7f5cd352-0998-a214-8dfc-c19898cecd21
* Content: [Domain analysis for microservices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/model/domain-analysis)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/model/domain-analysis.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/model/domain-analysis.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,bounded context i think it is important to call out that an entity can represent itself differently to different bounded context for example the entity drone will expose different details for drone management than for drone booking the article tries to do that but the nuance of an entity representing itself differently for different contexts is missed hence suggesting that it be called out explicitly or link to another page that exemplifies how same entity might appear in different contexts e g martin fowler s version document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
6387,14475690758.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-10 02:15:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,onprem.json not exist,architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc,"Looks like the script is looking for onprem.json in /identity-reference-architectures rather than under /identity-reference-architectures/adds-forest
![]()
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9b605d93-ab34-f8f0-2c64-d38fc5b0ab51
* Version Independent ID: 6e418fbb-e9f8-fa03-ef0e-ab6940ab62ce
* Content: [Create an AD DS resource forest in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"onprem.json not exist - Looks like the script is looking for onprem.json in /identity-reference-architectures rather than under /identity-reference-architectures/adds-forest
![]()
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9b605d93-ab34-f8f0-2c64-d38fc5b0ab51
* Version Independent ID: 6e418fbb-e9f8-fa03-ef0e-ab6940ab62ce
* Content: [Create an AD DS resource forest in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,onprem json not exist looks like the script is looking for onprem json in identity reference architectures rather than under identity reference architectures adds forest img width alt notexist src document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
4232,10746530965.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-30 11:14:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,choreography with message queues,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp product-question triaged,"Can anyone elaborate on the below? I thought resiliency is robust when message queue is used. Why does below say ""less robus""?
""On the other hand, for choreography, the role is distributed amongst all services and resiliency becomes less robust.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f568e9ac-4d16-5076-4863-5e007112b3db
* Version Independent ID: 9180ec47-aaf4-d811-d89d-437dd85fa878
* Content: [Choreography - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/choreography#example)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/choreography.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/choreography.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"choreography with message queues - Can anyone elaborate on the below? I thought resiliency is robust when message queue is used. Why does below say ""less robus""?
""On the other hand, for choreography, the role is distributed amongst all services and resiliency becomes less robust.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f568e9ac-4d16-5076-4863-5e007112b3db
* Version Independent ID: 9180ec47-aaf4-d811-d89d-437dd85fa878
* Content: [Choreography - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/choreography#example)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/choreography.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/choreography.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,choreography with message queues can anyone elaborate on the below i thought resiliency is robust when message queue is used why does below say less robus on the other hand for choreography the role is distributed amongst all services and resiliency becomes less robust document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10622,27167383386.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 16:21:52,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Architecture Diagram does not load,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: df354e21-f263-30a9-1a5c-1460f2bf16a9
* Version Independent ID: 73d2f19b-00a0-fe4d-7042-15d27f586565
* Content: [Web application monitoring on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Architecture Diagram does not load - 
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: df354e21-f263-30a9-1a5c-1460f2bf16a9
* Version Independent ID: 73d2f19b-00a0-fe4d-7042-15d27f586565
* Content: [Web application monitoring on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,architecture diagram does not load document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
6104,13732025887.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-05 03:15:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How is this asynchronous?!,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp product-question triaged,"
I am not able to understand how this is asynchronous? From the example diagram it clearly sends a response status on the first call! The status check call is for post processing!
I may be completely wrong on understanding the complete picture, but are we saying server side asynchronous operation makes client server asynchronous?!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @WillEastbury
* Microsoft Alias: **wieastbu**",1.0,"How is this asynchronous?! -
I am not able to understand how this is asynchronous? From the example diagram it clearly sends a response status on the first call! The status check call is for post processing!
I may be completely wrong on understanding the complete picture, but are we saying server side asynchronous operation makes client server asynchronous?!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @WillEastbury
* Microsoft Alias: **wieastbu**",1,how is this asynchronous i am not able to understand how this is asynchronous from the example diagram it clearly sends a response status on the first call the status check call is for post processing i may be completely wrong on understanding the complete picture but are we saying server side asynchronous operation makes client server asynchronous document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login willeastbury microsoft alias wieastbu ,1
9131,24059545098.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 20:36:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Seems really old,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 best-practice/subsvc,"This article is from 2017? Should be retired or updated maybe?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 98e6cd92-676a-6d6f-2ea8-ebe9301f59a9
* Version Independent ID: edfbb571-5bcf-2339-2cce-5e6a22fd591c
* Content: [Autoscaling guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/auto-scaling)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/auto-scaling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/auto-scaling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Seems really old - This article is from 2017? Should be retired or updated maybe?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 98e6cd92-676a-6d6f-2ea8-ebe9301f59a9
* Version Independent ID: edfbb571-5bcf-2339-2cce-5e6a22fd591c
* Content: [Autoscaling guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/auto-scaling)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/auto-scaling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/auto-scaling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,seems really old this article is from should be retired or updated maybe document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9178,24170426156.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-22 18:41:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AWS to Azure services comparison - missing AWS services,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri1,"Under [Database](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#database), you may also want to include:
* [Amazon Neptune](https://aws.amazon.com/neptune/) - aligns to Azure Cosmos DB Gremlin API
* [Amazon MemoryDB](https://aws.amazon.com/memorydb/) - aligns to the Cache for Redis
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1.0,"AWS to Azure services comparison - missing AWS services - Under [Database](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#database), you may also want to include:
* [Amazon Neptune](https://aws.amazon.com/neptune/) - aligns to Azure Cosmos DB Gremlin API
* [Amazon MemoryDB](https://aws.amazon.com/memorydb/) - aligns to the Cache for Redis
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1,aws to azure services comparison missing aws services under you may also want to include aligns to azure cosmos db gremlin api aligns to the cache for redis document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login edprice msft microsoft alias yuanzhiqu ,1
9704,25079995753.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-07 18:25:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,ADLS information is outdated,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
A paragraph on Data Lake Store references Data lake Analytics, which is no longer supported.
the following text is also confusing: 'You may consider using this as an alternative to Azure Storage when your individual or combined file sizes exceed that which is supported by Azure Storage.'
Azure data lake storage v2 requires an azure storage account, so how can it be an alternative for a storage account?
The ADLS paragraphs also mixes the names 'Data Lake' (the concept) and 'Data Lake Store' , but does not use the official name 'Data Lake Storage', which adds to the confusion.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4931350d-0c12-00b2-64a8-112f67aba3f2
* Version Independent ID: eed89d06-7676-30e1-b801-2f67a09856f0
* Content: [Choosing a data storage technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"ADLS information is outdated -
[Enter feedback here]
A paragraph on Data Lake Store references Data lake Analytics, which is no longer supported.
the following text is also confusing: 'You may consider using this as an alternative to Azure Storage when your individual or combined file sizes exceed that which is supported by Azure Storage.'
Azure data lake storage v2 requires an azure storage account, so how can it be an alternative for a storage account?
The ADLS paragraphs also mixes the names 'Data Lake' (the concept) and 'Data Lake Store' , but does not use the official name 'Data Lake Storage', which adds to the confusion.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4931350d-0c12-00b2-64a8-112f67aba3f2
* Version Independent ID: eed89d06-7676-30e1-b801-2f67a09856f0
* Content: [Choosing a data storage technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,adls information is outdated a paragraph on data lake store references data lake analytics which is no longer supported the following text is also confusing you may consider using this as an alternative to azure storage when your individual or combined file sizes exceed that which is supported by azure storage azure data lake storage requires an azure storage account so how can it be an alternative for a storage account the adls paragraphs also mixes the names data lake the concept and data lake store but does not use the official name data lake storage which adds to the confusion document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4637,11485007393.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-11 06:08:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Very interesting,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"Please expand this one with some clear examples! This can lead to huge increase of business value!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4c16d9ca-f2e2-5f3a-7c01-9187c7b1f02b
* Version Independent ID: 0ad9169e-20ce-4370-17bb-615ae64db0e9
* Content: [Demand Forecasting + Price Optimization - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting-price-optimization-marketing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting-price-optimization-marketing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting-price-optimization-marketing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Very interesting - Please expand this one with some clear examples! This can lead to huge increase of business value!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4c16d9ca-f2e2-5f3a-7c01-9187c7b1f02b
* Version Independent ID: 0ad9169e-20ce-4370-17bb-615ae64db0e9
* Content: [Demand Forecasting + Price Optimization - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting-price-optimization-marketing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting-price-optimization-marketing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting-price-optimization-marketing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,very interesting please expand this one with some clear examples this can lead to huge increase of business value document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5444,12498193060.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:50:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Step By step Solutions,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Please Provide step by step for this solution.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 90981e8d-b753-e389-1569-c544fe1c58e6
* Version Independent ID: 10c830e2-8257-2ee2-aae0-0a6e7df69695
* Content: [Forecast Energy and Power Demand - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/forecast-energy-power-demand#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/forecast-energy-power-demand.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/forecast-energy-power-demand.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Step By step Solutions - Please Provide step by step for this solution.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 90981e8d-b753-e389-1569-c544fe1c58e6
* Version Independent ID: 10c830e2-8257-2ee2-aae0-0a6e7df69695
* Content: [Forecast Energy and Power Demand - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/forecast-energy-power-demand#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/forecast-energy-power-demand.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/forecast-energy-power-demand.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,step by step solutions please provide step by step for this solution document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
3929,10314684547.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-30 04:45:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,large scaler,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp docs-experience reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"i might be mistaken, sorry - but the intro says ""large scaler"" when i think the intent was to say ""larger scale""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cab154f6-58af-5834-ae23-9824b21541e0
* Version Independent ID: bb8941b3-59fd-fae3-0cbb-f8c0307de62e
* Content: [Batch scoring with R Models on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-r-models)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-R-models.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-R-models.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"large scaler - i might be mistaken, sorry - but the intro says ""large scaler"" when i think the intent was to say ""larger scale""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cab154f6-58af-5834-ae23-9824b21541e0
* Version Independent ID: bb8941b3-59fd-fae3-0cbb-f8c0307de62e
* Content: [Batch scoring with R Models on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-r-models)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-R-models.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-R-models.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,large scaler i might be mistaken sorry but the intro says large scaler when i think the intent was to say larger scale document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login njray microsoft alias pnp ,1
3563,9794986681.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-11 01:36:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please consider to add Japanese document for this,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-idea loc reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Please
---
#### ドキュメントの詳細
⚠ *このセクションを編集しないでください。 docs.microsoft.com で必須です ➟ GitHub の問題のリンク。*
* ID: e9383c21-9143-1559-c1a8-e6f6dc830159
* Version Independent ID: 37c6c659-a6bc-633e-2b3f-337deb01c215
* Content: [Integrate on-premises AD domains with Azure AD - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/ja-jp/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Please consider to add Japanese document for this - Please
---
#### ドキュメントの詳細
⚠ *このセクションを編集しないでください。 docs.microsoft.com で必須です ➟ GitHub の問題のリンク。*
* ID: e9383c21-9143-1559-c1a8-e6f6dc830159
* Version Independent ID: 37c6c659-a6bc-633e-2b3f-337deb01c215
* Content: [Integrate on-premises AD domains with Azure AD - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/ja-jp/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please consider to add japanese document for this please ドキュメントの詳細 ⚠ このセクションを編集しないでください。 docs microsoft com で必須です ➟ github の問題のリンク。 id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9057,24003489219.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-14 13:16:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,PowerShell script to be changed,architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
The PowerShell script must be changed at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet#add-the-ip-address-range
1. foreach loop must be added to run Remove-AzVirtualNetworkPeering on all peerings:
_foreach ($hubPeering in $hubPeerings) {
Remove-AzVirtualNetworkPeering -VirtualNetworkName $vnethubname -ResourceGroupName $rgname -name $hubPeering.Name -Force
}_
2. Sync-AzVirtualNetworkPeering must be added in the foreach loop foreach ($vNetPeering in $hubPeerings) to remove final manual sync step:
_Sync-AzVirtualNetworkPeering -Name $peeringName -VirtualNetworkName $vNetName -ResourceGroupName $rgname_
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **randycam**",1.0,"PowerShell script to be changed -
The PowerShell script must be changed at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet#add-the-ip-address-range
1. foreach loop must be added to run Remove-AzVirtualNetworkPeering on all peerings:
_foreach ($hubPeering in $hubPeerings) {
Remove-AzVirtualNetworkPeering -VirtualNetworkName $vnethubname -ResourceGroupName $rgname -name $hubPeering.Name -Force
}_
2. Sync-AzVirtualNetworkPeering must be added in the foreach loop foreach ($vNetPeering in $hubPeerings) to remove final manual sync step:
_Sync-AzVirtualNetworkPeering -Name $peeringName -VirtualNetworkName $vNetName -ResourceGroupName $rgname_
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **randycam**",1,powershell script to be changed the powershell script must be changed at foreach loop must be added to run remove azvirtualnetworkpeering on all peerings foreach hubpeering in hubpeerings remove azvirtualnetworkpeering virtualnetworkname vnethubname resourcegroupname rgname name hubpeering name force sync azvirtualnetworkpeering must be added in the foreach loop foreach vnetpeering in hubpeerings to remove final manual sync step sync azvirtualnetworkpeering name peeringname virtualnetworkname vnetname resourcegroupname rgname document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login randycampbell microsoft alias randycam ,1
3920,10289678865.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-27 13:56:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Locking down the DB tier.,Pri3 architecture-center/svc cxp product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Can you please clarify if we can lock the DB down, similar to how the function app is locked down.
I know that its possible if the function app is inside an ASE and use SQL Managed instance and set the firewall settings to allow traffic from the ASE subnet, am looking for options for accomplishing this from the function app in consumption plan to a Managed instance SQL.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 524d1f97-ce37-f9ac-cf05-d33665eb34df
* Version Independent ID: fe4cc63f-a4b1-c30e-f39f-f4c3de1c57be
* Content: [Serverless web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Locking down the DB tier. - Can you please clarify if we can lock the DB down, similar to how the function app is locked down.
I know that its possible if the function app is inside an ASE and use SQL Managed instance and set the firewall settings to allow traffic from the ASE subnet, am looking for options for accomplishing this from the function app in consumption plan to a Managed instance SQL.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 524d1f97-ce37-f9ac-cf05-d33665eb34df
* Version Independent ID: fe4cc63f-a4b1-c30e-f39f-f4c3de1c57be
* Content: [Serverless web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,locking down the db tier can you please clarify if we can lock the db down similar to how the function app is locked down i know that its possible if the function app is inside an ase and use sql managed instance and set the firewall settings to allow traffic from the ase subnet am looking for options for accomplishing this from the function app in consumption plan to a managed instance sql document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
4479,11201450552.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-04 03:29:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing entries for General types,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"Please add rows under the general types section for
- Subscription
- Management Group
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1ddc35bf-00d9-67c8-bf6a-ade5ebea07ca
* Version Independent ID: 7324a1e6-7010-c620-145b-3d8027709545
* Content: [Naming rules and restrictions for Azure resources](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/resource-naming)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @DerMar
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing entries for General types - Please add rows under the general types section for
- Subscription
- Management Group
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1ddc35bf-00d9-67c8-bf6a-ade5ebea07ca
* Version Independent ID: 7324a1e6-7010-c620-145b-3d8027709545
* Content: [Naming rules and restrictions for Azure resources](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/resource-naming)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @DerMar
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing entries for general types please add rows under the general types section for subscription management group document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login dermar microsoft alias pnp ,1
9730,25113157049.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 22:31:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Update diagram branding around Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"The copy on this page has been updated to reflect branding changes for Microsoft Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, etc. But the diagram is not updated and uses ""ASC"" (Azure Security Center"", etc.
Consider reviewing the related content, in addition to this specific article.
HT: @YuriDio @rayne-wiselman
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dce3b9c5-ef05-1ff3-a6fe-052f48a9b471
* Version Independent ID: f6d3e8e8-37c5-43e6-6185-58f8511dee7e
* Content: [Hybrid security monitoring with Sentinel - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Update diagram branding around Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Defender - The copy on this page has been updated to reflect branding changes for Microsoft Defender, Microsoft Sentinel, etc. But the diagram is not updated and uses ""ASC"" (Azure Security Center"", etc.
Consider reviewing the related content, in addition to this specific article.
HT: @YuriDio @rayne-wiselman
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dce3b9c5-ef05-1ff3-a6fe-052f48a9b471
* Version Independent ID: f6d3e8e8-37c5-43e6-6185-58f8511dee7e
* Content: [Hybrid security monitoring with Sentinel - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,update diagram branding around microsoft sentinel and microsoft defender the copy on this page has been updated to reflect branding changes for microsoft defender microsoft sentinel etc but the diagram is not updated and uses asc azure security center etc consider reviewing the related content in addition to this specific article ht yuridio rayne wiselman document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
6643,14975264016.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-28 05:44:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Gateway looks like a orchestrator ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp design-pattern/subsvc product-question triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Is gateway not doing job of orchestrator
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 658a04f2-a906-dd3a-b4ce-3f2c7dcaad8f
* Version Independent ID: 974d5fdf-e7d8-fb51-4195-9d2dea89b6f4
* Content: [Gateway Aggregation pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/gateway-aggregation)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/gateway-aggregation.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/gateway-aggregation.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Gateway looks like a orchestrator -
[Enter feedback here]
Is gateway not doing job of orchestrator
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 658a04f2-a906-dd3a-b4ce-3f2c7dcaad8f
* Version Independent ID: 974d5fdf-e7d8-fb51-4195-9d2dea89b6f4
* Content: [Gateway Aggregation pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/gateway-aggregation)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/gateway-aggregation.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/gateway-aggregation.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,gateway looks like a orchestrator is gateway not doing job of orchestrator document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9740,25135456133.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-09 18:12:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,7lowa lpage,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f02ce282-99fb-660f-5429-63464639425c
* Version Independent ID: f78d5883-88d5-091e-24b9-318aeea0f168
* Content: [AKS container CI/CD with Jenkins and Kubernetes - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/container-cicd-using-jenkins-and-kubernetes-on-azure-container-service)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/container-cicd-using-jenkins-and-kubernetes-on-azure-container-service.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/container-cicd-using-jenkins-and-kubernetes-on-azure-container-service.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"7lowa lpage -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f02ce282-99fb-660f-5429-63464639425c
* Version Independent ID: f78d5883-88d5-091e-24b9-318aeea0f168
* Content: [AKS container CI/CD with Jenkins and Kubernetes - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/container-cicd-using-jenkins-and-kubernetes-on-azure-container-service)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/container-cicd-using-jenkins-and-kubernetes-on-azure-container-service.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/container-cicd-using-jenkins-and-kubernetes-on-azure-container-service.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, lpage document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9721,25104665311.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:49:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Link pointing to wrong page,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
In the second paragraph of the ""Working with CSV and JSON data in Azure"" section of the web page found at the link https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json, there is an ""import CSV files"" link. Instead of taking you to a page about importing CSV files it takes you to the ""Import JSON documents into SQL Server"" page.(https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/json/import-json-documents-into-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver15)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5ac957c-9568-b3f0-d79e-72a36439bee9
* Version Independent ID: e89413dd-8815-3d38-d7f0-6a6d0268db1e
* Content: [Processing CSV and JSON files - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Link pointing to wrong page -
In the second paragraph of the ""Working with CSV and JSON data in Azure"" section of the web page found at the link https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json, there is an ""import CSV files"" link. Instead of taking you to a page about importing CSV files it takes you to the ""Import JSON documents into SQL Server"" page.(https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/relational-databases/json/import-json-documents-into-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver15)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5ac957c-9568-b3f0-d79e-72a36439bee9
* Version Independent ID: e89413dd-8815-3d38-d7f0-6a6d0268db1e
* Content: [Processing CSV and JSON files - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,link pointing to wrong page in the second paragraph of the working with csv and json data in azure section of the web page found at the link there is an import csv files link instead of taking you to a page about importing csv files it takes you to the import json documents into sql server page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
7728,18990108495.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-22 05:44:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Recommend using AadIssuerValidator,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc azure-guide/subsvc,"For https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/claims#issuer-validation, you might be interested in the new [Microsoft.IdentityModel.Validators](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.IdentityModel.Validators/) NuGet package, which provides an issuer validator for AAD and AAD B2C single and multi-tenant apps for the public cloud and sovereign clouds:
See https://github.com/AzureAD/azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet/blob/3eb940655dcf9f685fc3979bfd63185cb8a8bf55/src/Microsoft.IdentityModel.Validators/AadIssuerValidator/AadIssuerValidator.cs#L175-L178
```csharp
AadIssuerValidator aadIssuerValidator = AadIssuerValidator.GetAadIssuerValidator(authority, httpClient);
TokenValidationParameters.IssuerValidator = aadIssuerValidator.Validate;
```
Microsoft.Identity.Web is using it, btw
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a5d00031-82e8-a8ee-0a66-e9b84231e837
* Version Independent ID: 9a9da08f-83e2-c493-61af-c4b5316c6f8e
* Content: [Claim-based identities in multitenant apps - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/claims)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/claims.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/claims.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Recommend using AadIssuerValidator - For https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/claims#issuer-validation, you might be interested in the new [Microsoft.IdentityModel.Validators](https://www.nuget.org/packages/Microsoft.IdentityModel.Validators/) NuGet package, which provides an issuer validator for AAD and AAD B2C single and multi-tenant apps for the public cloud and sovereign clouds:
See https://github.com/AzureAD/azure-activedirectory-identitymodel-extensions-for-dotnet/blob/3eb940655dcf9f685fc3979bfd63185cb8a8bf55/src/Microsoft.IdentityModel.Validators/AadIssuerValidator/AadIssuerValidator.cs#L175-L178
```csharp
AadIssuerValidator aadIssuerValidator = AadIssuerValidator.GetAadIssuerValidator(authority, httpClient);
TokenValidationParameters.IssuerValidator = aadIssuerValidator.Validate;
```
Microsoft.Identity.Web is using it, btw
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a5d00031-82e8-a8ee-0a66-e9b84231e837
* Version Independent ID: 9a9da08f-83e2-c493-61af-c4b5316c6f8e
* Content: [Claim-based identities in multitenant apps - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/claims)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/claims.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/claims.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,recommend using aadissuervalidator for you might be interested in the new nuget package which provides an issuer validator for aad and aad single and multi tenant apps for the public cloud and sovereign clouds see csharp aadissuervalidator aadissuervalidator aadissuervalidator getaadissuervalidator authority httpclient tokenvalidationparameters issuervalidator aadissuervalidator validate microsoft identity web is using it btw document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
8123,21030380820.0,IssuesEvent,2022-03-31 00:20:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Link broken,doc-bug cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
Link to Azure Media Services Streaming Endpoints leads to a 404 page
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cd6efdd9-5b74-3186-a8f9-ac482f1215f2
* Version Independent ID: e262bd4f-11f1-ab1c-ffb1-61361287464c
* Content: [Video-on-demand digital media - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Link broken -
Link to Azure Media Services Streaming Endpoints leads to a 404 page
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cd6efdd9-5b74-3186-a8f9-ac482f1215f2
* Version Independent ID: e262bd4f-11f1-ab1c-ffb1-61361287464c
* Content: [Video-on-demand digital media - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,link broken link to azure media services streaming endpoints leads to a page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11235,28506255919.0,IssuesEvent,2023-04-18 21:46:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SLA/HW configuration is incorrect in picture,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"SLA/HW configuration combination is incorrect in picture in section ""SLA offered by Availability Zones"".
The SLA for single VMs using **HDD** for the OS disk is 95%. The picture mentions Premium (which requires **SSD**). Easiest fix is to change the picture so that instead of HDD, it would say SSD.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Building solutions for high availability using Availability Zones - High Availability](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"SLA/HW configuration is incorrect in picture - SLA/HW configuration combination is incorrect in picture in section ""SLA offered by Availability Zones"".
The SLA for single VMs using **HDD** for the OS disk is 95%. The picture mentions Premium (which requires **SSD**). Easiest fix is to change the picture so that instead of HDD, it would say SSD.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Building solutions for high availability using Availability Zones - High Availability](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,sla hw configuration is incorrect in picture sla hw configuration combination is incorrect in picture in section sla offered by availability zones the sla for single vms using hdd for the os disk is the picture mentions premium which requires ssd easiest fix is to change the picture so that instead of hdd it would say ssd document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9571,24845905143.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-26 15:51:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Dead link to scripts,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
There is a link on page 30 of **Managing Microsoft 365 in true DevOps style with Microsoft365Dsc and Azure DevOps** to [https://microsoft365dsc.com/Pages/Resources/Whitepapers/M365Automation.zip](https://microsoft365dsc.com/Pages/Resources/Whitepapers/M365Automation.zip) which now returns a 404. It is not possible to complete the following steps in the solution without these files.
Thanks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d5235541-bce4-2057-81c0-0557fe8a196a
* Version Independent ID: d5235541-bce4-2057-81c0-0557fe8a196a
* Content: [Manage Microsoft 365 tenant configuration with Azure DevOps - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/devops/manage-microsoft-365-tenant-configuration-microsoft365dsc-devops)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/devops/manage-microsoft-365-tenant-configuration-microsoft365dsc-devops.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/devops/manage-microsoft-365-tenant-configuration-microsoft365dsc-devops.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @desmay
* Microsoft Alias: **desmay**",1.0,"Dead link to scripts -
There is a link on page 30 of **Managing Microsoft 365 in true DevOps style with Microsoft365Dsc and Azure DevOps** to [https://microsoft365dsc.com/Pages/Resources/Whitepapers/M365Automation.zip](https://microsoft365dsc.com/Pages/Resources/Whitepapers/M365Automation.zip) which now returns a 404. It is not possible to complete the following steps in the solution without these files.
Thanks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d5235541-bce4-2057-81c0-0557fe8a196a
* Version Independent ID: d5235541-bce4-2057-81c0-0557fe8a196a
* Content: [Manage Microsoft 365 tenant configuration with Azure DevOps - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/devops/manage-microsoft-365-tenant-configuration-microsoft365dsc-devops)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/devops/manage-microsoft-365-tenant-configuration-microsoft365dsc-devops.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/devops/manage-microsoft-365-tenant-configuration-microsoft365dsc-devops.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @desmay
* Microsoft Alias: **desmay**",1,dead link to scripts there is a link on page of managing microsoft in true devops style with and azure devops to which now returns a it is not possible to complete the following steps in the solution without these files thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login desmay microsoft alias desmay ,1
9217,24251116993.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 14:16:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Patterns categorization issue ?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"
[Regarding [Patterns catalog](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/#catalog-of-patterns), it seems that 2 patterns are missing in the page ""Operational Excellence"" : Geodes and Materialized View]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f922c02-5f01-a733-7553-8ef7d70bf78e
* Version Independent ID: 5db9d38a-fada-f3e3-3d63-21e27f4eaee0
* Content: [Operational Excellence patterns - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/devops-patterns)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/devops-patterns.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/devops-patterns.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Patterns categorization issue ? -
[Regarding [Patterns catalog](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/#catalog-of-patterns), it seems that 2 patterns are missing in the page ""Operational Excellence"" : Geodes and Materialized View]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f922c02-5f01-a733-7553-8ef7d70bf78e
* Version Independent ID: 5db9d38a-fada-f3e3-3d63-21e27f4eaee0
* Content: [Operational Excellence patterns - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/devops-patterns)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/devops-patterns.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/devops-patterns.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,patterns categorization issue it seems that patterns are missing in the page operational excellence geodes and materialized view document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fada content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5445,12498209420.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:52:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can we have the detail implementation steps,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"It would be great if this article goes with detailed steps, benefits, challenges ...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ca76f303-efb9-b535-3025-52ca002a6ed9
* Version Independent ID: 6b05002e-45a5-ec82-a8cd-3d82544ea296
* Content: [Archive on-premises data to cloud - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can we have the detail implementation steps - It would be great if this article goes with detailed steps, benefits, challenges ...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ca76f303-efb9-b535-3025-52ca002a6ed9
* Version Independent ID: 6b05002e-45a5-ec82-a8cd-3d82544ea296
* Content: [Archive on-premises data to cloud - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can we have the detail implementation steps it would be great if this article goes with detailed steps benefits challenges document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
11076,27965406521.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 19:02:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Replace Time Series Insights with Azure Data Explorer,doc-enhancement in-progress assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 guide/subsvc,"Time Series Insights is being retired and we are suggesting ADX as an alternative to our customers now. This diagram should be updated to reflect that.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 88559925-9b9e-d9b3-ddb6-08306692c17b
* Version Independent ID: a25055cb-7cfe-28a0-1c66-06172c037128
* Content: [Data store decision tree - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Replace Time Series Insights with Azure Data Explorer - Time Series Insights is being retired and we are suggesting ADX as an alternative to our customers now. This diagram should be updated to reflect that.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 88559925-9b9e-d9b3-ddb6-08306692c17b
* Version Independent ID: a25055cb-7cfe-28a0-1c66-06172c037128
* Content: [Data store decision tree - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,replace time series insights with azure data explorer time series insights is being retired and we are suggesting adx as an alternative to our customers now this diagram should be updated to reflect that document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dsk microsoft alias pnp ,1
9184,24171843481.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-22 20:00:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Load Balance- Regional or Global,in-progress assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
I see that this page has a chart that has reclassified the Azure Load Balancer as Global not Regional. It was listed as Regional before. Why has this changed? Traffic Manager and Front Door would be the Global items while Traffic Manager and Load Balancer as Regional.
Cheers,
Jeff Smalley MCT
Chicagoville
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Load Balance- Regional or Global -
I see that this page has a chart that has reclassified the Azure Load Balancer as Global not Regional. It was listed as Regional before. Why has this changed? Traffic Manager and Front Door would be the Global items while Traffic Manager and Load Balancer as Regional.
Cheers,
Jeff Smalley MCT
Chicagoville
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure load balance regional or global i see that this page has a chart that has reclassified the azure load balancer as global not regional it was listed as regional before why has this changed traffic manager and front door would be the global items while traffic manager and load balancer as regional cheers jeff smalley mct chicagoville document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11077,27965640979.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 19:15:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mislabeled arrow in sample architecture diagarm?,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 solution-idea/subsvc,"In the sample architecture diagram from an anonymous customer, it would appear that the final green arrow exiting the bottom of the left side should be labeled ""Masked production data"" as opposed to the current ""Unmasked production data"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f64651d0-1885-248b-0d8c-6773f4b6ae1a
* Version Independent ID: f64651d0-1885-248b-0d8c-6773f4b6ae1a
* Content: [Data obfuscation using Delphix in Azure Data Factory and Synapse Analytics - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/ai/data-obfuscation-with-delphix-in-azure-data-factory)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/ai/data-obfuscation-with-delphix-in-azure-data-factory.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/ai/data-obfuscation-with-delphix-in-azure-data-factory.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @nabhishek
* Microsoft Alias: **abnarain**",1.0,"Mislabeled arrow in sample architecture diagarm? - In the sample architecture diagram from an anonymous customer, it would appear that the final green arrow exiting the bottom of the left side should be labeled ""Masked production data"" as opposed to the current ""Unmasked production data"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f64651d0-1885-248b-0d8c-6773f4b6ae1a
* Version Independent ID: f64651d0-1885-248b-0d8c-6773f4b6ae1a
* Content: [Data obfuscation using Delphix in Azure Data Factory and Synapse Analytics - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/ai/data-obfuscation-with-delphix-in-azure-data-factory)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/ai/data-obfuscation-with-delphix-in-azure-data-factory.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/ai/data-obfuscation-with-delphix-in-azure-data-factory.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @nabhishek
* Microsoft Alias: **abnarain**",1,mislabeled arrow in sample architecture diagarm in the sample architecture diagram from an anonymous customer it would appear that the final green arrow exiting the bottom of the left side should be labeled masked production data as opposed to the current unmasked production data document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login nabhishek microsoft alias abnarain ,1
4948,11872560762.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-26 15:59:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken link,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp product-question solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"The link in broken
*Use Azure CDN in Azure App Service - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/cdn-websites-with-cdn
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 33a55fba-7e30-02ff-b525-f00f19610b15
* Version Independent ID: 42905489-5272-bee8-531f-b4be826eeb7f
* Content: [Scalable Episerver marketing website - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-episerver#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-episerver.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-episerver.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Broken link - The link in broken
*Use Azure CDN in Azure App Service - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/cdn-websites-with-cdn
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 33a55fba-7e30-02ff-b525-f00f19610b15
* Version Independent ID: 42905489-5272-bee8-531f-b4be826eeb7f
* Content: [Scalable Episerver marketing website - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-episerver#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-episerver.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-episerver.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,broken link the link in broken use azure cdn in azure app service document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
4345,10958765169.0,IssuesEvent,2019-11-27 10:02:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Custom Image scale set limits,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"...have been increased to 600 now.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: adbd9d8a-e443-aeab-cdf1-1c9c8858746c
* Version Independent ID: 5a0980f5-b246-0865-6f06-aa875f87a5ce
* Content: [Criteria for choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Custom Image scale set limits - ...have been increased to 600 now.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: adbd9d8a-e443-aeab-cdf1-1c9c8858746c
* Version Independent ID: 5a0980f5-b246-0865-6f06-aa875f87a5ce
* Content: [Criteria for choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,custom image scale set limits have been increased to now document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id aeab version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6847,15555863208.0,IssuesEvent,2021-03-16 06:54:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Architecture,architecture-center/svc azure-guide/subsvc cxp product-question triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 830e1782-9caa-3533-10a0-85a3d4483d24
* Version Independent ID: d66583fa-188c-9dce-b6fd-84b34c0bf315
* Content: [Real time processing - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing?WT.mc_id=AZ-MVP-4039873&source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Architecture -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 830e1782-9caa-3533-10a0-85a3d4483d24
* Version Independent ID: d66583fa-188c-9dce-b6fd-84b34c0bf315
* Content: [Real time processing - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing?WT.mc_id=AZ-MVP-4039873&source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,architecture document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
4390,11048949489.0,IssuesEvent,2019-12-09 22:19:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Lower vs. higher routing priority,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"There is a mistake in the Front Door routing section: ""Set the backend pool with different priority values, 1 for the active region and 2 or lower for the standby or passive region."" It should be 2 or higher. According to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/front-door-routing-methods#priority lower means higher priority.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region#availability-considerations---front-door)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Lower vs. higher routing priority - There is a mistake in the Front Door routing section: ""Set the backend pool with different priority values, 1 for the active region and 2 or lower for the standby or passive region."" It should be 2 or higher. According to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/front-door-routing-methods#priority lower means higher priority.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region#availability-considerations---front-door)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,lower vs higher routing priority there is a mistake in the front door routing section set the backend pool with different priority values for the active region and or lower for the standby or passive region it should be or higher according to lower means higher priority document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5094,12057513589.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-15 15:57:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,mspnp / spark-monitoring Is not working properly,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The library which you have shared is not working properly mspnp/spark-monitoring please rectify it.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"mspnp / spark-monitoring Is not working properly - The library which you have shared is not working properly mspnp/spark-monitoring please rectify it.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,mspnp spark monitoring is not working properly the library which you have shared is not working properly mspnp spark monitoring please rectify it document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6653,14986931877.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-28 22:00:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Reverse admin sync guidance,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged well-architected/subsvc,"
Recommending reversing the guidance regarding separating on-prem and cloud-only accounts. The guidance is to avoid synching cloud-only accounts to on-prem vs the recommendation should be avoid synching on-prem admins to cloud-only. As stated, AAD Connect has a default rule that won't sync an admin account (admincount = 1 I believe), but another poor practice I've seen is a customer has an additional on-prem NON-admin account that is synced to AAD as a global admin.
Looking at it from cloud-only to on-prem doesn't happen frequently and not even show how this would be setup, guess custom AAD rule? Either way, not common.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ee907a51-a7f2-16b6-7c61-e5b09f14229f
* Version Independent ID: 4725a038-dcf1-efee-bc9e-86d3322d52d0
* Content: [Security with identity and access management (IAM) in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/Security/design-identity#dont-synchronize-on-premises-admin-accounts-to-cloud-identity-providers)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/design-identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/design-identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Reverse admin sync guidance -
Recommending reversing the guidance regarding separating on-prem and cloud-only accounts. The guidance is to avoid synching cloud-only accounts to on-prem vs the recommendation should be avoid synching on-prem admins to cloud-only. As stated, AAD Connect has a default rule that won't sync an admin account (admincount = 1 I believe), but another poor practice I've seen is a customer has an additional on-prem NON-admin account that is synced to AAD as a global admin.
Looking at it from cloud-only to on-prem doesn't happen frequently and not even show how this would be setup, guess custom AAD rule? Either way, not common.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ee907a51-a7f2-16b6-7c61-e5b09f14229f
* Version Independent ID: 4725a038-dcf1-efee-bc9e-86d3322d52d0
* Content: [Security with identity and access management (IAM) in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/Security/design-identity#dont-synchronize-on-premises-admin-accounts-to-cloud-identity-providers)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/design-identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/design-identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,reverse admin sync guidance recommending reversing the guidance regarding separating on prem and cloud only accounts the guidance is to avoid synching cloud only accounts to on prem vs the recommendation should be avoid synching on prem admins to cloud only as stated aad connect has a default rule that won t sync an admin account admincount i believe but another poor practice i ve seen is a customer has an additional on prem non admin account that is synced to aad as a global admin looking at it from cloud only to on prem doesn t happen frequently and not even show how this would be setup guess custom aad rule either way not common document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id efee content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
7127,16636566781.0,IssuesEvent,2021-06-04 00:01:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Render Cycle of a payload,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question triaged well-architected/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Under ""Caching"" subsection, there's a statement which goes ""Every render cycle of a payload will consume Compute & Memory"". What is meant by Render Cycle of a payload ? Can you point me to any resource where I can read more on this concept ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8826a1c7-1335-0bf1-26f9-8dc77fbdf20f
* Version Independent ID: 75fd4df2-2d30-ee46-8792-b3fc887eadbe
* Content: [Tradeoffs for costs - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/tradeoffs)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/tradeoffs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/tradeoffs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Render Cycle of a payload -
[Enter feedback here]
Under ""Caching"" subsection, there's a statement which goes ""Every render cycle of a payload will consume Compute & Memory"". What is meant by Render Cycle of a payload ? Can you point me to any resource where I can read more on this concept ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8826a1c7-1335-0bf1-26f9-8dc77fbdf20f
* Version Independent ID: 75fd4df2-2d30-ee46-8792-b3fc887eadbe
* Content: [Tradeoffs for costs - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/tradeoffs)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/tradeoffs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/tradeoffs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,render cycle of a payload under caching subsection there s a statement which goes every render cycle of a payload will consume compute memory what is meant by render cycle of a payload can you point me to any resource where i can read more on this concept document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
6363,14362500822.0,IssuesEvent,2020-11-30 19:55:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,App Service Global Vnet Peering,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author example-scenario/subsvc product-question triaged,"Is there a plan to enhance App Service VNet integration to utilise global vnet peering?
So that app services can access SQL Databases via private endpoints in different regions.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7499b146-3340-d7d1-6c5f-3ed508b773cb
* Version Independent ID: 61b10612-1136-3840-c7c1-804e63b23410
* Content: [Web app private connectivity to Azure SQL database - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app#global-peering)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **jelled**",1.0,"App Service Global Vnet Peering - Is there a plan to enhance App Service VNet integration to utilise global vnet peering?
So that app services can access SQL Databases via private endpoints in different regions.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7499b146-3340-d7d1-6c5f-3ed508b773cb
* Version Independent ID: 61b10612-1136-3840-c7c1-804e63b23410
* Content: [Web app private connectivity to Azure SQL database - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app#global-peering)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **jelled**",1,app service global vnet peering is there a plan to enhance app service vnet integration to utilise global vnet peering so that app services can access sql databases via private endpoints in different regions document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login jelledruyts microsoft alias jelled ,1
9101,24038247999.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 21:27:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Implementation FAQ Chatbot with data champion model,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
Hi Team ,
We would need your support in implementing ""FAQ Chatbot with data champion model"" architecture for one of our client , could you please let me know pricing for architecture model ? what is an ""Data champion"" model , any document on data champion model would be helpful
With regards ,
Padmanabhan Kudiarasu
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 97d6b01e-9e6f-5fdb-4ac4-95f71887908f
* Version Independent ID: d60fa02f-3cfe-e46d-0a8b-8b42e1bf62ff
* Content: [FAQ Chatbot with data champion model - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/faq-chatbot-with-data-champion-model)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/faq-chatbot-with-data-champion-model.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/faq-chatbot-with-data-champion-model.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Implementation FAQ Chatbot with data champion model -
Hi Team ,
We would need your support in implementing ""FAQ Chatbot with data champion model"" architecture for one of our client , could you please let me know pricing for architecture model ? what is an ""Data champion"" model , any document on data champion model would be helpful
With regards ,
Padmanabhan Kudiarasu
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 97d6b01e-9e6f-5fdb-4ac4-95f71887908f
* Version Independent ID: d60fa02f-3cfe-e46d-0a8b-8b42e1bf62ff
* Content: [FAQ Chatbot with data champion model - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/faq-chatbot-with-data-champion-model)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/faq-chatbot-with-data-champion-model.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/faq-chatbot-with-data-champion-model.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,implementation faq chatbot with data champion model hi team we would need your support in implementing faq chatbot with data champion model architecture for one of our client could you please let me know pricing for architecture model what is an data champion model any document on data champion model would be helpful with regards padmanabhan kudiarasu document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
8250,21715265123.0,IssuesEvent,2022-05-10 17:15:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Pricing Links appear to be wrong,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"With the Medium and Large pricing links - the price estimator for 500,000 and 50,000,000 images - puts those values in the S1 tier, but the estimator shows the price per 1,000 transactions, therefore I believe the pricing should dividing both the Medium and Large tier transactions by 1,000 - unless I'm not understanding.
The small pricing tier does appear to show the correct values.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8866b26b-b0e7-494e-48cf-491db44b3aeb
* Version Independent ID: bd1d10ff-39db-a6cb-1a63-805e19159561
* Content: [Image classification on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @aschauhan22
* Microsoft Alias: **Ashish.Chauhan**",1.0,"Pricing Links appear to be wrong - With the Medium and Large pricing links - the price estimator for 500,000 and 50,000,000 images - puts those values in the S1 tier, but the estimator shows the price per 1,000 transactions, therefore I believe the pricing should dividing both the Medium and Large tier transactions by 1,000 - unless I'm not understanding.
The small pricing tier does appear to show the correct values.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8866b26b-b0e7-494e-48cf-491db44b3aeb
* Version Independent ID: bd1d10ff-39db-a6cb-1a63-805e19159561
* Content: [Image classification on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @aschauhan22
* Microsoft Alias: **Ashish.Chauhan**",1,pricing links appear to be wrong with the medium and large pricing links the price estimator for and images puts those values in the tier but the estimator shows the price per transactions therefore i believe the pricing should dividing both the medium and large tier transactions by unless i m not understanding the small pricing tier does appear to show the correct values document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login microsoft alias ashish chauhan ,1
10234,26562105043.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-20 16:42:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Wrong comparison,assigned-to-author product-feedback triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"Hi,
You have the wrong comparison in the Firewall section. The equivelent for Azure Firewall is not the web application firewall but rather the ""AWS Network Firewall""
See more info here - https://aws.amazon.com/network-firewall/?whats-new-cards.sort-by=item.additionalFields.postDateTime&whats-new-cards.sort-order=desc
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @BrianQu
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1.0,"Wrong comparison - Hi,
You have the wrong comparison in the Firewall section. The equivelent for Azure Firewall is not the web application firewall but rather the ""AWS Network Firewall""
See more info here - https://aws.amazon.com/network-firewall/?whats-new-cards.sort-by=item.additionalFields.postDateTime&whats-new-cards.sort-order=desc
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @BrianQu
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1,wrong comparison hi you have the wrong comparison in the firewall section the equivelent for azure firewall is not the web application firewall but rather the aws network firewall see more info here document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login brianqu microsoft alias yuanzhiqu ,1
5791,13161073692.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-10 18:49:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio Stencils are also needed with SVG version.,Pri2 architecture-center/svc duplicate,"Please include something that can be used by native Microsoft tools.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Visio Stencils are also needed with SVG version. - Please include something that can be used by native Microsoft tools.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio stencils are also needed with svg version please include something that can be used by native microsoft tools document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10632,27169115015.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 17:42:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add ARO and remove Service Fabric,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"Hi,
The decision tree at [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#choose-a-candidate-service](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#choose-a-candidate-service) should no more display Service-Fabric .... and should add Azure RedHat OpenShift aka ARO
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Add ARO and remove Service Fabric - Hi,
The decision tree at [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#choose-a-candidate-service](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#choose-a-candidate-service) should no more display Service-Fabric .... and should add Azure RedHat OpenShift aka ARO
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,add aro and remove service fabric hi the decision tree at should no more display service fabric and should add azure redhat openshift aka aro document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10142,26383552650.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-12 10:28:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing Icon: Azure Machine Learning,doc-enhancement triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"Missing Icon: Azure Machine Learning
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing Icon: Azure Machine Learning - Missing Icon: Azure Machine Learning
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing icon azure machine learning missing icon azure machine learning document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6584,14926223007.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-24 10:30:25,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SVG Version of architecture diagram,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
Please can we have SVG versions of architecture diagrams so that we can use that as a starting point to build out new components for customer architectures (editable in Visio). Today as a PNG, there is a lot of extra work to recreate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6beac55-590d-a02d-3424-e766976acd44
* Version Independent ID: 40e5543f-8139-584f-5936-f0d77797ee9f
* Content: [Azure Data Explorer monitoring - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-azure-data-explorer)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-azure-data-explorer.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-azure-data-explorer.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @orspod
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"SVG Version of architecture diagram -
Please can we have SVG versions of architecture diagrams so that we can use that as a starting point to build out new components for customer architectures (editable in Visio). Today as a PNG, there is a lot of extra work to recreate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6beac55-590d-a02d-3424-e766976acd44
* Version Independent ID: 40e5543f-8139-584f-5936-f0d77797ee9f
* Content: [Azure Data Explorer monitoring - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-azure-data-explorer)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-azure-data-explorer.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-azure-data-explorer.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @orspod
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,svg version of architecture diagram please can we have svg versions of architecture diagrams so that we can use that as a starting point to build out new components for customer architectures editable in visio today as a png there is a lot of extra work to recreate document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login orspod microsoft alias pnp ,1
10462,26992697542.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-09 21:20:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Article and spreadsheet naming number differs,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"The CA-Persona-Internals is CA100 on the docs page but CA200 on the spreadsheet. I know these are examples but it might confuse people.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Version Independent ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Content: [Conditional Access framework and policies - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/security/conditional-access-framework)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @clajes
* Microsoft Alias: **clajes**",1.0,"Article and spreadsheet naming number differs - The CA-Persona-Internals is CA100 on the docs page but CA200 on the spreadsheet. I know these are examples but it might confuse people.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Version Independent ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Content: [Conditional Access framework and policies - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/security/conditional-access-framework)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @clajes
* Microsoft Alias: **clajes**",1,article and spreadsheet naming number differs the ca persona internals is on the docs page but on the spreadsheet i know these are examples but it might confuse people document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login clajes microsoft alias clajes ,1
11200,28375072085.0,IssuesEvent,2023-04-12 20:08:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incomplete listings of pages and categories,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"Looking at the list of available patterns, the 'categories' sub-pages don't seem to list all available categories and the index on the overview page doesn't list all available patterns in the sidebar.
For example, 'Reliability' is a missing category and 'Saga' pattern isn't listed at all on the overview page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771
* Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5
* Content: [Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Incomplete listings of pages and categories - Looking at the list of available patterns, the 'categories' sub-pages don't seem to list all available categories and the index on the overview page doesn't list all available patterns in the sidebar.
For example, 'Reliability' is a missing category and 'Saga' pattern isn't listed at all on the overview page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771
* Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5
* Content: [Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,incomplete listings of pages and categories looking at the list of available patterns the categories sub pages don t seem to list all available categories and the index on the overview page doesn t list all available patterns in the sidebar for example reliability is a missing category and saga pattern isn t listed at all on the overview page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4036,10513257983.0,IssuesEvent,2019-09-27 20:05:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Excellent Article - Blurred / Unclear Images ,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc triaged,"Excellent article, very crisp and super useful guidance. However, the images are not clear, could be due to the font used and also the image quality. Could you please upload better images?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 36e200d2-2d51-4a8a-d8ef-4c03890c42d0
* Version Independent ID: 12a83d63-c2cb-91ad-a3c6-b078d23d8a9d
* Content: [Monitoring and diagnostics guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/monitoring.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/monitoring.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Excellent Article - Blurred / Unclear Images - Excellent article, very crisp and super useful guidance. However, the images are not clear, could be due to the font used and also the image quality. Could you please upload better images?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 36e200d2-2d51-4a8a-d8ef-4c03890c42d0
* Version Independent ID: 12a83d63-c2cb-91ad-a3c6-b078d23d8a9d
* Content: [Monitoring and diagnostics guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/monitoring.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/monitoring.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,excellent article blurred unclear images excellent article very crisp and super useful guidance however the images are not clear could be due to the font used and also the image quality could you please upload better images document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9764,25166367256.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 21:15:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Old product names in CA graphic,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Detailed Conditional Access graphic still refers to Azure ATP instead of Microsoft Defender for Identity and still calls Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps MCAS.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5034ddc5-077e-1541-9b3e-479d6e35dd76
* Version Independent ID: 5034ddc5-077e-1541-9b3e-479d6e35dd76
* Content: [Conditional Access design principles and dependencies - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/security/conditional-access-design)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/security/conditional-access-design.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/security/conditional-access-design.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @clajes
* Microsoft Alias: **clajes**",1.0,"Old product names in CA graphic -
Detailed Conditional Access graphic still refers to Azure ATP instead of Microsoft Defender for Identity and still calls Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps MCAS.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5034ddc5-077e-1541-9b3e-479d6e35dd76
* Version Independent ID: 5034ddc5-077e-1541-9b3e-479d6e35dd76
* Content: [Conditional Access design principles and dependencies - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/security/conditional-access-design)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/security/conditional-access-design.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/security/conditional-access-design.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @clajes
* Microsoft Alias: **clajes**",1,old product names in ca graphic detailed conditional access graphic still refers to azure atp instead of microsoft defender for identity and still calls microsoft defender for cloud apps mcas document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login clajes microsoft alias clajes ,1
10182,26474456244.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-17 10:03:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Change from ""Can be contained?"" to ""Can be containerized?""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"On the Choose a candidate service diagram, I think it should say ""Can be containerized?"" instead of ""Can be contained?""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Change from ""Can be contained?"" to ""Can be containerized?"" - On the Choose a candidate service diagram, I think it should say ""Can be containerized?"" instead of ""Can be contained?""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,change from can be contained to can be containerized on the choose a candidate service diagram i think it should say can be containerized instead of can be contained document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11047,27843414273.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-20 14:09:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,ERS stands for Enqueue Replication Server,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[
Below paragraph has a corrections
""Standard Load Balancer supports multiple front-end virtual IPs. This support is ideal for cluster implementations that include these components:
Advanced Business Application Programming (ABAP) SAP Central Service (ASCS)
Evaluated receipt settlement (ERS)""
Here ERS stands for Enqeue Replication server instead of Evaluated receipt settlement (ERS)
]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 009774ee-d1e4-1d7b-e53f-ecbcc4d56e5d
* Version Independent ID: d14a99bb-b4d5-21ce-dd72-5759a8284c42
* Content: [SAP S/4HANA in Linux on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-in/azure/architecture/guide/sap/sap-s4hana)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/sap/sap-s4hana.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/sap/sap-s4hana.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @bqtrinh
* Microsoft Alias: **bentrin**
![]()
",1.0,"ERS stands for Enqueue Replication Server -
[
Below paragraph has a corrections
""Standard Load Balancer supports multiple front-end virtual IPs. This support is ideal for cluster implementations that include these components:
Advanced Business Application Programming (ABAP) SAP Central Service (ASCS)
Evaluated receipt settlement (ERS)""
Here ERS stands for Enqeue Replication server instead of Evaluated receipt settlement (ERS)
]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 009774ee-d1e4-1d7b-e53f-ecbcc4d56e5d
* Version Independent ID: d14a99bb-b4d5-21ce-dd72-5759a8284c42
* Content: [SAP S/4HANA in Linux on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-in/azure/architecture/guide/sap/sap-s4hana)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/sap/sap-s4hana.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/sap/sap-s4hana.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @bqtrinh
* Microsoft Alias: **bentrin**
![]()
",1,ers stands for enqueue replication server below paragraph has a corrections standard load balancer supports multiple front end virtual ips this support is ideal for cluster implementations that include these components advanced business application programming abap sap central service ascs evaluated receipt settlement ers here ers stands for enqeue replication server instead of evaluated receipt settlement ers document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login bqtrinh microsoft alias bentrin img width alt clipboard src ,1
10625,27167738541.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 16:37:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,First Visio Link is incorrect.,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"First Visio link appears to be wrong. It's download Visio file to a single region example.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web app - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Arvindboggaram
* Microsoft Alias: **arboggar**",2.0,"First Visio Link is incorrect. - First Visio link appears to be wrong. It's download Visio file to a single region example.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web app - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Arvindboggaram
* Microsoft Alias: **arboggar**",1,first visio link is incorrect first visio link appears to be wrong it s download visio file to a single region example document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login arvindboggaram microsoft alias arboggar ,1
5440,12498108087.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:41:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,do not use << or >> in the PS commands line,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"do not use <<or >> in the PowerShell examples. thoses characters are not recognized by the ISE PowerShell 5.x editor and the copy paste options now requires some corrections before executing directly the shell .ps1
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 61c1b093-200e-8d59-0e6e-98f510dca5f6
* Version Independent ID: db6fcf0f-1a88-b216-4c08-a83c4128b4fa
* Content: [Connect an on-premises network to Azure using ExpressRoute - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"do not use << or >> in the PS commands line - do not use <<or >> in the PowerShell examples. thoses characters are not recognized by the ISE PowerShell 5.x editor and the copy paste options now requires some corrections before executing directly the shell .ps1
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 61c1b093-200e-8d59-0e6e-98f510dca5f6
* Version Independent ID: db6fcf0f-1a88-b216-4c08-a83c4128b4fa
* Content: [Connect an on-premises network to Azure using ExpressRoute - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,do not use in the ps commands line do not use lt lt or gt gt in the powershell examples thoses characters are not recognized by the ise powershell x editor and the copy paste options now requires some corrections before executing directly the shell document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5013,11949814805.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-03 14:14:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How would that work in case there is some common components,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Let's say the code has some common features that more than one service is using. How would such a thing work in the CI/CD mentioned here?
Also is it possible to have another docs for Gitflow instead of trunk based development?
In the Github repo, there is one pipeline for each micro-service. Would it be better to have a gated build for branch code to run everything including unit tests and docker-compose to validate the PR content and then once the pr is approved develop branch build kicks in and do the same plus pushing images to Container Registry and publishing the artifacts for later use?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 57f4d213-3eb1-5b4c-aa67-116e8fa36f7d
* Version Independent ID: 18199b5a-8f57-6574-c795-7540199ae49a
* Content: [Building a CI/CD pipeline for microservices on Kubernetes - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"How would that work in case there is some common components - Let's say the code has some common features that more than one service is using. How would such a thing work in the CI/CD mentioned here?
Also is it possible to have another docs for Gitflow instead of trunk based development?
In the Github repo, there is one pipeline for each micro-service. Would it be better to have a gated build for branch code to run everything including unit tests and docker-compose to validate the PR content and then once the pr is approved develop branch build kicks in and do the same plus pushing images to Container Registry and publishing the artifacts for later use?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 57f4d213-3eb1-5b4c-aa67-116e8fa36f7d
* Version Independent ID: 18199b5a-8f57-6574-c795-7540199ae49a
* Content: [Building a CI/CD pipeline for microservices on Kubernetes - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,how would that work in case there is some common components let s say the code has some common features that more than one service is using how would such a thing work in the ci cd mentioned here also is it possible to have another docs for gitflow instead of trunk based development in the github repo there is one pipeline for each micro service would it be better to have a gated build for branch code to run everything including unit tests and docker compose to validate the pr content and then once the pr is approved develop branch build kicks in and do the same plus pushing images to container registry and publishing the artifacts for later use document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9224,24254940892.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 16:56:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Updated Azure Databricks icon,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks icon on [this diagram](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/_images/recommenders-architecture.png) on the [Build a Real-time Recommendation API on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation) architecture with this new SVG file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13z9cECUZsyu8ZjWzHErUZbAhuO_jXlUK/
Thank you,
Clinton Ford
Principal Product Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9353bd7c-c25d-5a4d-17cd-df6d8038d2a3
* Version Independent ID: 21434ad8-78fc-03e3-0bd1-03cc706627c7
* Content: [Build a Real-time Recommendation API on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Updated Azure Databricks icon - Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks icon on [this diagram](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/_images/recommenders-architecture.png) on the [Build a Real-time Recommendation API on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation) architecture with this new SVG file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13z9cECUZsyu8ZjWzHErUZbAhuO_jXlUK/
Thank you,
Clinton Ford
Principal Product Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9353bd7c-c25d-5a4d-17cd-df6d8038d2a3
* Version Independent ID: 21434ad8-78fc-03e3-0bd1-03cc706627c7
* Content: [Build a Real-time Recommendation API on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/real-time-recommendation.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,updated azure databricks icon hi could you help me update the azure databricks icon on on the architecture with this new svg file thank you clinton ford principal product marketing manager databricks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login njray microsoft alias pnp ,1
6035,13541185291.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 15:33:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Naming conventions of Icons,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"
We are doing some work with ARM templates and attempting to use the latest Icon sets.
The problem we are seeing is there is no consistence way in which the icons are named which can map to templates or schemas.
Please could it be considered .
e.g Template schemas refer to Virtual scale sets as 'virtualMachineScaleSets', but the icon is buried in the Compute directory called ""10034-icon-service-VM-Scalte-Sets"".
How are we meant to quick / auto identify between the too. Before the naming convention did link back to the recourses types
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Naming conventions of Icons -
We are doing some work with ARM templates and attempting to use the latest Icon sets.
The problem we are seeing is there is no consistence way in which the icons are named which can map to templates or schemas.
Please could it be considered .
e.g Template schemas refer to Virtual scale sets as 'virtualMachineScaleSets', but the icon is buried in the Compute directory called ""10034-icon-service-VM-Scalte-Sets"".
How are we meant to quick / auto identify between the too. Before the naming convention did link back to the recourses types
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,naming conventions of icons we are doing some work with arm templates and attempting to use the latest icon sets the problem we are seeing is there is no consistence way in which the icons are named which can map to templates or schemas please could it be considered e g template schemas refer to virtual scale sets as virtualmachinescalesets but the icon is buried in the compute directory called icon service vm scalte sets how are we meant to quick auto identify between the too before the naming convention did link back to the recourses types document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5992,13463235868.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-09 17:15:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The Next Steps Section is looping towards same page,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-bug triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 78a7e7bd-23f3-a39f-9015-b77f14bb43e5
* Version Independent ID: 0ac34e7e-315f-2452-bf0a-74e9b1068c38
* Content: [Microservices architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"The Next Steps Section is looping towards same page -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 78a7e7bd-23f3-a39f-9015-b77f14bb43e5
* Version Independent ID: 0ac34e7e-315f-2452-bf0a-74e9b1068c38
* Content: [Microservices architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,the next steps section is looping towards same page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11670,32054642476.0,IssuesEvent,2023-09-24 00:17:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Clarification on APIM network configuration,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
The diagram shows APIM inside a VNET. In this case is APIM configured inside the VNET (internal)?
If I understand [this doc](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/private-link#limitations) correctly, there is a current limitation that would prevent AFD > APIM over private link. If that is the case, how can we route traffic from AFD > APIM while APIM is internal to the VNET?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Version Independent ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Content: [Scalable cloud applications and SRE - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **subhajch**",1.0,"Clarification on APIM network configuration -
The diagram shows APIM inside a VNET. In this case is APIM configured inside the VNET (internal)?
If I understand [this doc](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/private-link#limitations) correctly, there is a current limitation that would prevent AFD > APIM over private link. If that is the case, how can we route traffic from AFD > APIM while APIM is internal to the VNET?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Version Independent ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Content: [Scalable cloud applications and SRE - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **subhajch**",1,clarification on apim network configuration the diagram shows apim inside a vnet in this case is apim configured inside the vnet internal if i understand correctly there is a current limitation that would prevent afd apim over private link if that is the case how can we route traffic from afd apim while apim is internal to the vnet thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login martinekuan microsoft alias subhajch ,1
10912,27456404012.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-02 21:46:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,404 Issue with documents,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 guide/subsvc,"This page https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/landing-zones/landing-zone-deploy is missing a valid link to documents
I get 404 from MS and Github.
Example - https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/main/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/organize/cloud-strategy.md
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 75727ca9-f46f-24a6-3871-25cc45b61de8
* Version Independent ID: 75727ca9-f46f-24a6-3871-25cc45b61de8
* Content: [Deploy Azure landing zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/landing-zones/landing-zone-deploy)
* Content Source: [docs/landing-zones/landing-zone-deploy.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/landing-zones/landing-zone-deploy.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1.0,"404 Issue with documents - This page https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/landing-zones/landing-zone-deploy is missing a valid link to documents
I get 404 from MS and Github.
Example - https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/main/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/organize/cloud-strategy.md
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 75727ca9-f46f-24a6-3871-25cc45b61de8
* Version Independent ID: 75727ca9-f46f-24a6-3871-25cc45b61de8
* Content: [Deploy Azure landing zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/landing-zones/landing-zone-deploy)
* Content Source: [docs/landing-zones/landing-zone-deploy.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/landing-zones/landing-zone-deploy.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1, issue with documents this page is missing a valid link to documents i get from ms and github example document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login robbagby microsoft alias robbag ,1
5325,12365921331.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-18 09:35:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Where does Azure API Management fit into this flowchart?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"As per title.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Where does Azure API Management fit into this flowchart? - As per title.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,where does azure api management fit into this flowchart as per title document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10150,26405706941.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-13 07:46:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Outdated material,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"HI Team,
The last update on this site is in 2020?! Is there any chance it will be updated soon?
BR,
Karl
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Outdated material - HI Team,
The last update on this site is in 2020?! Is there any chance it will be updated soon?
BR,
Karl
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,outdated material hi team the last update on this site is in is there any chance it will be updated soon br karl document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11030,27805421233.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-17 19:24:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Virtual Network Info Is Outdated and Useless,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"
Hi the Virtual Network section links to docs from 2016 for CLASSIC vnet CREATION. What is required are docs for Resource Manager vNet deployment that show how to export/import vNet configuration. Additionally, vNets have related components - eg route tables and user defined routes, vNet peering, private endpoints, DNS configs. The situation for those needs to be documented as well. There also needs to be a specific section to address the case of the network hub in the platform landing zone.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b31c85c7-c25d-897f-e52d-789f7306457b
* Version Independent ID: 969106a5-df35-afef-5afc-96a26c970f44
* Content: [Recover from loss of an Azure region - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region)
* Content Source: [docs/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @adamglick
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Virtual Network Info Is Outdated and Useless -
Hi the Virtual Network section links to docs from 2016 for CLASSIC vnet CREATION. What is required are docs for Resource Manager vNet deployment that show how to export/import vNet configuration. Additionally, vNets have related components - eg route tables and user defined routes, vNet peering, private endpoints, DNS configs. The situation for those needs to be documented as well. There also needs to be a specific section to address the case of the network hub in the platform landing zone.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b31c85c7-c25d-897f-e52d-789f7306457b
* Version Independent ID: 969106a5-df35-afef-5afc-96a26c970f44
* Content: [Recover from loss of an Azure region - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region)
* Content Source: [docs/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @adamglick
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,virtual network info is outdated and useless hi the virtual network section links to docs from for classic vnet creation what is required are docs for resource manager vnet deployment that show how to export import vnet configuration additionally vnets have related components eg route tables and user defined routes vnet peering private endpoints dns configs the situation for those needs to be documented as well there also needs to be a specific section to address the case of the network hub in the platform landing zone document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afef content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login adamglick microsoft alias pnp ,1
9015,23978867736.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-13 13:41:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Loud optimized to Load optimized,architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
On top/left of the decision tree, where it states ""loud optimized"", should this be load or workload optimized? Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Loud optimized to Load optimized -
On top/left of the decision tree, where it states ""loud optimized"", should this be load or workload optimized? Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,loud optimized to load optimized on top left of the decision tree where it states loud optimized should this be load or workload optimized thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
10296,26676187580.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-26 14:26:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Ambiguous statement when comparing Azure CNI to Kubenet,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"This language sounds ambiguous. What are we implying here? Generally speaking, it's easier to deploy larger number of pods in a cluster leveraging the kubenet networkPlugin. We may want to be more specific here?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",2.0,"Ambiguous statement when comparing Azure CNI to Kubenet - This language sounds ambiguous. What are we implying here? Generally speaking, it's easier to deploy larger number of pods in a cluster leveraging the kubenet networkPlugin. We may want to be more specific here?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",1,ambiguous statement when comparing azure cni to kubenet this language sounds ambiguous what are we implying here generally speaking it s easier to deploy larger number of pods in a cluster leveraging the kubenet networkplugin we may want to be more specific here document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias prwilk ,1
7070,16459450819.0,IssuesEvent,2021-05-21 16:39:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,not sure if i am violating any terms by creating a structurizr theme with the icons,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question triaged,"
Hi,
i am in the process of creating a theme for a tool called structurizr and I would like to use the icons provided in the theme. However, I am not sure if I am violating any rules by doing so. can you tell me if I am or not. if I am, I will take the repo down.
i have included a readme in the repo with the proper attribution and included the terms in the repo too.
links:
https://structurizr.com/
https://github.com/dgcaron/structurizr-azure-theme
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"not sure if i am violating any terms by creating a structurizr theme with the icons -
Hi,
i am in the process of creating a theme for a tool called structurizr and I would like to use the icons provided in the theme. However, I am not sure if I am violating any rules by doing so. can you tell me if I am or not. if I am, I will take the repo down.
i have included a readme in the repo with the proper attribution and included the terms in the repo too.
links:
https://structurizr.com/
https://github.com/dgcaron/structurizr-azure-theme
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,not sure if i am violating any terms by creating a structurizr theme with the icons hi i am in the process of creating a theme for a tool called structurizr and i would like to use the icons provided in the theme however i am not sure if i am violating any rules by doing so can you tell me if i am or not if i am i will take the repo down i have included a readme in the repo with the proper attribution and included the terms in the repo too links document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10911,27456150678.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-02 21:32:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Translated pages shows markup instead of formatted text,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"
**Steps to reproduce:**
- Go to [CQRS pattern documentation page](https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs) in it-it or es-es languages
- Check the second h2 element in page
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [What is the CQRS pattern? - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Translated pages shows markup instead of formatted text - 
**Steps to reproduce:**
- Go to [CQRS pattern documentation page](https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs) in it-it or es-es languages
- Check the second h2 element in page
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [What is the CQRS pattern? - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,translated pages shows markup instead of formatted text steps to reproduce go to in it it or es es languages check the second element in page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9233,24262113093.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-28 00:27:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Guidance on managing code analysis that flags static usage pattern,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"This article describes a static usage pattern for HttpClient, which is an object that implements IDisposable.
This pattern will be flagged by Code Analysis because it doesn't call IDisposable::Dispose.
This documentation should have a note about managing the code analysis rules that are creating flags for this recommended usage pattern, Many people attempting to follow best engineering practices set up their systems to require resolution of all code analysis diagnostics, because they trust code analysis to be accurate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5dfc831d-af15-b8a9-5fc6-335bce4af155
* Version Independent ID: e2370017-a358-c817-2a69-0d036066f5bf
* Content: [Improper Instantiation antipattern - Performance antipatterns for cloud apps](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/antipatterns/improper-instantiation/)
* Content Source: [docs/antipatterns/improper-instantiation/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/antipatterns/improper-instantiation/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Guidance on managing code analysis that flags static usage pattern - This article describes a static usage pattern for HttpClient, which is an object that implements IDisposable.
This pattern will be flagged by Code Analysis because it doesn't call IDisposable::Dispose.
This documentation should have a note about managing the code analysis rules that are creating flags for this recommended usage pattern, Many people attempting to follow best engineering practices set up their systems to require resolution of all code analysis diagnostics, because they trust code analysis to be accurate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5dfc831d-af15-b8a9-5fc6-335bce4af155
* Version Independent ID: e2370017-a358-c817-2a69-0d036066f5bf
* Content: [Improper Instantiation antipattern - Performance antipatterns for cloud apps](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/antipatterns/improper-instantiation/)
* Content Source: [docs/antipatterns/improper-instantiation/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/antipatterns/improper-instantiation/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,guidance on managing code analysis that flags static usage pattern this article describes a static usage pattern for httpclient which is an object that implements idisposable this pattern will be flagged by code analysis because it doesn t call idisposable dispose this documentation should have a note about managing the code analysis rules that are creating flags for this recommended usage pattern many people attempting to follow best engineering practices set up their systems to require resolution of all code analysis diagnostics because they trust code analysis to be accurate document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9450,24605066238.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-14 15:29:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,DevOps section has malformed links,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on AKS - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",2.0,"DevOps section has malformed links -
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on AKS - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,devops section has malformed links document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
11072,27962497707.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 16:40:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Icons accessibility,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"We can use a Macro to populate the icons in an excle sheet. For each folder, a new sheet is added and all the icons in that folder are added per cell in the sheet with the label of the icon derived from the icon file name.
Optionally, we can create an index sheet for all the sheets added.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Icons accessibility - We can use a Macro to populate the icons in an excle sheet. For each folder, a new sheet is added and all the icons in that folder are added per cell in the sheet with the label of the icon derived from the icon file name.
Optionally, we can create an index sheet for all the sheets added.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,icons accessibility we can use a macro to populate the icons in an excle sheet for each folder a new sheet is added and all the icons in that folder are added per cell in the sheet with the label of the icon derived from the icon file name optionally we can create an index sheet for all the sheets added document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11287,29809136467.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-16 13:52:13,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,OS disk caching can be disabled - data disk still needed?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
""Create a separate virtual data disk for storing the database, logs, and sysvol folder for Active Directory. Do not store these items on the same disk as the operating system. By default, data disks that are attached to a VM use write-through caching. However, this form of caching can conflict with the requirements of AD DS. For this reason, set the Host Cache Preference setting on the data disk to None.""
Shouldn't this the be revised? OS disks can have caching disabled now in Azure so having a data disk is not necessary...?.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain#vm-recommendations)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"OS disk caching can be disabled - data disk still needed? -
""Create a separate virtual data disk for storing the database, logs, and sysvol folder for Active Directory. Do not store these items on the same disk as the operating system. By default, data disks that are attached to a VM use write-through caching. However, this form of caching can conflict with the requirements of AD DS. For this reason, set the Host Cache Preference setting on the data disk to None.""
Shouldn't this the be revised? OS disks can have caching disabled now in Azure so having a data disk is not necessary...?.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain#vm-recommendations)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,os disk caching can be disabled data disk still needed create a separate virtual data disk for storing the database logs and sysvol folder for active directory do not store these items on the same disk as the operating system by default data disks that are attached to a vm use write through caching however this form of caching can conflict with the requirements of ad ds for this reason set the host cache preference setting on the data disk to none shouldn t this the be revised os disks can have caching disabled now in azure so having a data disk is not necessary document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
5037,11986320336.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-07 19:05:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please make all session videos downloadable,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"currently the videos are not downloadable, only the transcript is
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3fe47949-15a1-6073-0ac7-91a072ee4ff5
* Version Independent ID: f670a787-e68f-1216-8194-1472510c4525
* Content: [Governance, risk, and compliance in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/governance?toc=%2Fsecurity%2Fcompass%2Ftoc.json&bc=%2Fsecurity%2Fcompass%2Fbreadcrumb%2Ftoc.json#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/governance.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/governance.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please make all session videos downloadable - currently the videos are not downloadable, only the transcript is
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3fe47949-15a1-6073-0ac7-91a072ee4ff5
* Version Independent ID: f670a787-e68f-1216-8194-1472510c4525
* Content: [Governance, risk, and compliance in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/governance?toc=%2Fsecurity%2Fcompass%2Ftoc.json&bc=%2Fsecurity%2Fcompass%2Fbreadcrumb%2Ftoc.json#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/governance.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/governance.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please make all session videos downloadable currently the videos are not downloadable only the transcript is document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10000,25968750101.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-19 09:28:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can I add content about Azure Spring Apps under TOC node: Azure Categories / Web,architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Hi, there.
This is Rujun from Azure Spring team.
Now I want to add a reference architecture article about best practice of building web applications using Spring framework and deploy to Azure Spring Apps. Here is related issue: https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/issues/32637
In current TOC, I found this: [Azure Categories / Web](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/web/web-start-here).
I think it's a good place to add my article. But I found that all articles are about Azure App Service. My concern is that maybe it's not a good place to put my article here.
Here are my question:
1. Do you have any concerns if I add article about Azure Spring Apps under [Azure Categories / Web](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/web/web-start-here).
2. If [Azure Categories / Web](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/web/web-start-here) is not a good place, do you have any better suggestions? For example: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2fad1a93-de94-0030-0733-3c2441d25c3c
* Version Independent ID: 2fad1a93-de94-0030-0733-3c2441d25c3c
* Content: [Web architecture design - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/web/web-start-here)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/web/web-start-here.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/web/web-start-here.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Can I add content about Azure Spring Apps under TOC node: Azure Categories / Web - Hi, there.
This is Rujun from Azure Spring team.
Now I want to add a reference architecture article about best practice of building web applications using Spring framework and deploy to Azure Spring Apps. Here is related issue: https://github.com/Azure/azure-sdk-for-java/issues/32637
In current TOC, I found this: [Azure Categories / Web](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/web/web-start-here).
I think it's a good place to add my article. But I found that all articles are about Azure App Service. My concern is that maybe it's not a good place to put my article here.
Here are my question:
1. Do you have any concerns if I add article about Azure Spring Apps under [Azure Categories / Web](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/web/web-start-here).
2. If [Azure Categories / Web](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/web/web-start-here) is not a good place, do you have any better suggestions? For example: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2fad1a93-de94-0030-0733-3c2441d25c3c
* Version Independent ID: 2fad1a93-de94-0030-0733-3c2441d25c3c
* Content: [Web architecture design - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/web/web-start-here)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/web/web-start-here.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/web/web-start-here.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,can i add content about azure spring apps under toc node azure categories web hi there this is rujun from azure spring team now i want to add a reference architecture article about best practice of building web applications using spring framework and deploy to azure spring apps here is related issue in current toc i found this i think it s a good place to add my article but i found that all articles are about azure app service my concern is that maybe it s not a good place to put my article here here are my question do you have any concerns if i add article about azure spring apps under if is not a good place do you have any better suggestions for example document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
5082,12035322590.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-13 17:40:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken Links,Pri3 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"The links in the ""Related Resources"" section at the bottom of this page are all broken.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/enterprise-bi-adf.md
",1.0,"Broken Links - The links in the ""Related Resources"" section at the bottom of this page are all broken.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/enterprise-bi-adf.md
",1,broken links the links in the related resources section at the bottom of this page are all broken ,1
5925,13303370444.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-25 15:25:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Sentinel Icons,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"
I cannot find any azure sentinel icons in the Icon sets.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Sentinel Icons -
I cannot find any azure sentinel icons in the Icon sets.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure sentinel icons i cannot find any azure sentinel icons in the icon sets document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9129,24059471222.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 20:30:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Business Logic for entire domain,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
[In the article you mentioned that API gateway shouldn't implement business logic. Each microservice is independent but there may scenario where one service need to call other service to fulfill the functionality or there may be service which will just call other services to fulfil the functionality in that case what is best practice to do so. If one service is calling other service then involving services can be tightly coupled?]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 78a7e7bd-23f3-a39f-9015-b77f14bb43e5
* Version Independent ID: 0ac34e7e-315f-2452-bf0a-74e9b1068c38
* Content: [Microservices architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Business Logic for entire domain -
[In the article you mentioned that API gateway shouldn't implement business logic. Each microservice is independent but there may scenario where one service need to call other service to fulfill the functionality or there may be service which will just call other services to fulfil the functionality in that case what is best practice to do so. If one service is calling other service then involving services can be tightly coupled?]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 78a7e7bd-23f3-a39f-9015-b77f14bb43e5
* Version Independent ID: 0ac34e7e-315f-2452-bf0a-74e9b1068c38
* Content: [Microservices architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,business logic for entire domain document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6791,15296547041.0,IssuesEvent,2021-02-24 07:02:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Cosmos DB Retry Guidance refers to old SDK Version,Pri2 architecture-center/svc best-practice/subsvc cxp doc-bug triaged,"The CosmosDb section seems to be based on the V2 SDK, which has long since been superseded by the V3 SDK. Can this be updated to account for the V3 sdk.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#cosmos-db)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Cosmos DB Retry Guidance refers to old SDK Version - The CosmosDb section seems to be based on the V2 SDK, which has long since been superseded by the V3 SDK. Can this be updated to account for the V3 sdk.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#cosmos-db)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,cosmos db retry guidance refers to old sdk version the cosmosdb section seems to be based on the sdk which has long since been superseded by the sdk can this be updated to account for the sdk document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
7347,17578859722.0,IssuesEvent,2021-08-16 02:51:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Duplicate content,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc well-architected/subsvc,"
The section that begins with ""The Windows N-tier application on Azure with SQL Server reference architecture"" is duplicated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f78e284-fb28-8ac2-0ce6-590b48c74a45
* Version Independent ID: 3baed527-6023-bc26-d3f9-9fda0a43925e
* Content: [Network security and containment in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/network-security-containment)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/network-security-containment.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/network-security-containment.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Duplicate content -
The section that begins with ""The Windows N-tier application on Azure with SQL Server reference architecture"" is duplicated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f78e284-fb28-8ac2-0ce6-590b48c74a45
* Version Independent ID: 3baed527-6023-bc26-d3f9-9fda0a43925e
* Content: [Network security and containment in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/network-security-containment)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/network-security-containment.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/network-security-containment.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,duplicate content the section that begins with the windows n tier application on azure with sql server reference architecture is duplicated document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9157,24119810367.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-20 17:38:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Which AWS App from the Gallery?,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"There are several AWS apps in the App Gallery, which one are we supposed to use?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6b08461-26fb-d148-a749-9b61217af0f8
* Version Independent ID: 1329c651-e8f6-cc68-4205-739dfbbcef4f
* Content: [Azure Active Directory security for AWS - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Which AWS App from the Gallery? - There are several AWS apps in the App Gallery, which one are we supposed to use?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6b08461-26fb-d148-a749-9b61217af0f8
* Version Independent ID: 1329c651-e8f6-cc68-4205-739dfbbcef4f
* Content: [Azure Active Directory security for AWS - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,which aws app from the gallery there are several aws apps in the app gallery which one are we supposed to use document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5587,12745965007.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-26 15:07:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Relevance to Media Services is not evident,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
The document is cataloged under Media Services. Content on the page is scanty and bears no resemblance to media services.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c3bee659-9929-c4e8-3f4c-de328edcab1c
* Version Independent ID: 7747dfe6-f1df-d54a-e703-128d0bad2697
* Content: [Instant Broadcasting on Serverless Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Relevance to Media Services is not evident -
The document is cataloged under Media Services. Content on the page is scanty and bears no resemblance to media services.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c3bee659-9929-c4e8-3f4c-de328edcab1c
* Version Independent ID: 7747dfe6-f1df-d54a-e703-128d0bad2697
* Content: [Instant Broadcasting on Serverless Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/instant-broadcasting-on-serverless-architecture.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,relevance to media services is not evident the document is cataloged under media services content on the page is scanty and bears no resemblance to media services document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
6039,13542282879.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 17:05:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Updated Diagram with new Azure Databricks Logo,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement needs-art solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Hi, could you help me update the Databricks logo on the architecture diagram shown on the [advanced analytics on big data](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data)? I have created an [updated architecture diagram image](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a9Nyj2vv2DwZalmGOYR4zLMTxsq1cHph/), using the [new Databricks icon](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QvtmjSvrRo8Y9T3aRR9e4RHmXMqqFihP/).
Thank you!
Clinton Ford
Staff Partner Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Updated Diagram with new Azure Databricks Logo - Hi, could you help me update the Databricks logo on the architecture diagram shown on the [advanced analytics on big data](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data)? I have created an [updated architecture diagram image](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a9Nyj2vv2DwZalmGOYR4zLMTxsq1cHph/), using the [new Databricks icon](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QvtmjSvrRo8Y9T3aRR9e4RHmXMqqFihP/).
Thank you!
Clinton Ford
Staff Partner Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,updated diagram with new azure databricks logo hi could you help me update the databricks logo on the architecture diagram shown on the i have created an using the thank you clinton ford staff partner marketing manager databricks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
7919,20020324197.0,IssuesEvent,2022-02-01 15:51:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Query of Architecture decision tree.,architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"I have a query regarding one of the outcomes within the architecture decision tree below. The Statement of ""Proximity Placement groups (PPG's) with optional availability sets (ASs) in availability zones (AZs)"". How is it possible to use availability sets in availability zones? These availability options are mutually exclusive, and when deploying a VM or groups of VM's you choose either to deploy using availability sets OR availability zones. Are you able to clarify?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/iaas-high-availability-disaster-recovery?source=docs#architecture
Many Thanks
Adam
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 97211a88-4ce9-263f-4bd0-ae6d8b61447c
* Version Independent ID: 00570dc5-7b74-2906-1653-90d86b67c0bd
* Content: [High availability and disaster recovery for IaaS apps - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/iaas-high-availability-disaster-recovery?source=docs#architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/iaas-high-availability-disaster-recovery.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/iaas-high-availability-disaster-recovery.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @shcrouch
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Query of Architecture decision tree. - I have a query regarding one of the outcomes within the architecture decision tree below. The Statement of ""Proximity Placement groups (PPG's) with optional availability sets (ASs) in availability zones (AZs)"". How is it possible to use availability sets in availability zones? These availability options are mutually exclusive, and when deploying a VM or groups of VM's you choose either to deploy using availability sets OR availability zones. Are you able to clarify?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/iaas-high-availability-disaster-recovery?source=docs#architecture
Many Thanks
Adam
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 97211a88-4ce9-263f-4bd0-ae6d8b61447c
* Version Independent ID: 00570dc5-7b74-2906-1653-90d86b67c0bd
* Content: [High availability and disaster recovery for IaaS apps - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/iaas-high-availability-disaster-recovery?source=docs#architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/iaas-high-availability-disaster-recovery.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/iaas-high-availability-disaster-recovery.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @shcrouch
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,query of architecture decision tree i have a query regarding one of the outcomes within the architecture decision tree below the statement of proximity placement groups ppg s with optional availability sets ass in availability zones azs how is it possible to use availability sets in availability zones these availability options are mutually exclusive and when deploying a vm or groups of vm s you choose either to deploy using availability sets or availability zones are you able to clarify many thanks adam document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login shcrouch microsoft alias pnp ,1
4602,11419608196.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-03 08:23:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Goals of the Cost Monitoring activities is missing,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-design-principles/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"Hello
The article is going straight to the point on solutions but is missing introducing what is the purpose of Cost Monitoring.
I suggest the following definition: ""Cost monitoring is about establishing controls and business processes for reviewing your cloud spend to avoid any misuse and take advantage of new opportunities through flexibility provided by the cloud.""
Feel free to loop me in internal thread if needed, I'd be happy to contribute.
Olivier
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad5ff56e-7e61-df64-5493-46232a9919a5
* Version Independent ID: 98dc2296-093e-47f2-8f50-eecc652ac6fc
* Content: [Monitoring your cloud costs](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/monitoring.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/monitoring.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Goals of the Cost Monitoring activities is missing - Hello
The article is going straight to the point on solutions but is missing introducing what is the purpose of Cost Monitoring.
I suggest the following definition: ""Cost monitoring is about establishing controls and business processes for reviewing your cloud spend to avoid any misuse and take advantage of new opportunities through flexibility provided by the cloud.""
Feel free to loop me in internal thread if needed, I'd be happy to contribute.
Olivier
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad5ff56e-7e61-df64-5493-46232a9919a5
* Version Independent ID: 98dc2296-093e-47f2-8f50-eecc652ac6fc
* Content: [Monitoring your cloud costs](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/monitoring.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/monitoring.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,goals of the cost monitoring activities is missing hello the article is going straight to the point on solutions but is missing introducing what is the purpose of cost monitoring i suggest the following definition cost monitoring is about establishing controls and business processes for reviewing your cloud spend to avoid any misuse and take advantage of new opportunities through flexibility provided by the cloud feel free to loop me in internal thread if needed i d be happy to contribute olivier document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
5368,12400444663.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-21 07:52:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Use of azbb in these examples,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
I found a recommendation in other Microsoft docs: ""Don't use azbb - it is in sustain mode and the npm package is out of date""
This documentation should be updated to reflect that. Someone could waste a lot of time following these instructions only to encounter an error while deploying the generated template.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Use of azbb in these examples -
I found a recommendation in other Microsoft docs: ""Don't use azbb - it is in sustain mode and the npm package is out of date""
This documentation should be updated to reflect that. Someone could waste a lot of time following these instructions only to encounter an error while deploying the generated template.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,use of azbb in these examples i found a recommendation in other microsoft docs don t use azbb it is in sustain mode and the npm package is out of date this documentation should be updated to reflect that someone could waste a lot of time following these instructions only to encounter an error while deploying the generated template document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
11117,28065515067.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-29 15:09:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Why the title has AWS in it?,doc-enhancement triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
Do not find any AWS information specific or comparison in this page and so wondering why the title has ""AWS"" in it.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d42fd9ae-205d-042a-4d38-4ca356e27d17
* Version Independent ID: 694c671b-430e-31b6-9133-2324bb3a2efa
* Content: [Comparing AWS and Azure regions and zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/regions-zones)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/regions-zones.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/regions-zones.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Why the title has AWS in it? -
[Enter feedback here]
Do not find any AWS information specific or comparison in this page and so wondering why the title has ""AWS"" in it.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d42fd9ae-205d-042a-4d38-4ca356e27d17
* Version Independent ID: 694c671b-430e-31b6-9133-2324bb3a2efa
* Content: [Comparing AWS and Azure regions and zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/regions-zones)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/regions-zones.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/regions-zones.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,why the title has aws in it do not find any aws information specific or comparison in this page and so wondering why the title has aws in it document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10233,26562094351.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-20 16:41:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add JavaScript to General capabilities table for PostgreSQL,assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 Product-bug azure-guide/subsvc,"Capability matrix -> General capabilities
There is also plv8 - PL/JavaScript (v8) trusted procedural language
which is an extension for Azure Database for PostgreSQL
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: af4555db-76bc-15c1-6b17-ddf5be651b70
* Version Independent ID: 3ec33db3-f67d-6786-aeb3-9737896088bf
* Content: [Online transaction processing (OLTP) - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Add JavaScript to General capabilities table for PostgreSQL - Capability matrix -> General capabilities
There is also plv8 - PL/JavaScript (v8) trusted procedural language
which is an extension for Azure Database for PostgreSQL
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: af4555db-76bc-15c1-6b17-ddf5be651b70
* Version Independent ID: 3ec33db3-f67d-6786-aeb3-9737896088bf
* Content: [Online transaction processing (OLTP) - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,add javascript to general capabilities table for postgresql capability matrix general capabilities there is also pl javascript trusted procedural language which is an extension for azure database for postgresql document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
10924,27540017523.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-07 07:51:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please add Azure Arc-related icons to the icon .svg file download package,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"It would be really great to add the Azure Arc-related service icons .svg files to the download package.
Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes
Azure Arc-enabled machines/servers
Azure Arc-enabled data services
Azure Arc-enabled SQL Managed Instance
Azure Arc-enabled PostgreSQL
Azure Arc-enabled SQL Server
Azure Arc-enabled Machine Learning
......
There are many such services now. We often have to draw architectural diagrams connecting on-premises, edge, and multi-cloud to Azure. This would make it much easier!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @Zimmergren
* Microsoft Alias: **tozimmergren**",1.0,"Please add Azure Arc-related icons to the icon .svg file download package - It would be really great to add the Azure Arc-related service icons .svg files to the download package.
Azure Arc-enabled Kubernetes
Azure Arc-enabled machines/servers
Azure Arc-enabled data services
Azure Arc-enabled SQL Managed Instance
Azure Arc-enabled PostgreSQL
Azure Arc-enabled SQL Server
Azure Arc-enabled Machine Learning
......
There are many such services now. We often have to draw architectural diagrams connecting on-premises, edge, and multi-cloud to Azure. This would make it much easier!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @Zimmergren
* Microsoft Alias: **tozimmergren**",1,please add azure arc related icons to the icon svg file download package it would be really great to add the azure arc related service icons svg files to the download package azure arc enabled kubernetes azure arc enabled machines servers azure arc enabled data services azure arc enabled sql managed instance azure arc enabled postgresql azure arc enabled sql server azure arc enabled machine learning there are many such services now we often have to draw architectural diagrams connecting on premises edge and multi cloud to azure this would make it much easier document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login zimmergren microsoft alias tozimmergren ,1
6044,13542571991.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 17:33:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Details,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement doc-idea solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"I would love to know more about the architectural details of **Extract, transform, and load (ETL) using HDInsight**
* Code samples
* nonfunctional requirements
* functional requirements
Thanks & regards
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f35186e5-f0c5-8a9a-f2a6-ee53c80facfc
* Version Independent ID: 918cfabe-c932-4072-e4a0-5ab79c827365
* Content: [Extract, transform, and load (ETL) using HDInsight - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/extract-transform-and-load-using-hdinsight)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/extract-transform-and-load-using-hdinsight.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/extract-transform-and-load-using-hdinsight.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Details - I would love to know more about the architectural details of **Extract, transform, and load (ETL) using HDInsight**
* Code samples
* nonfunctional requirements
* functional requirements
Thanks & regards
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f35186e5-f0c5-8a9a-f2a6-ee53c80facfc
* Version Independent ID: 918cfabe-c932-4072-e4a0-5ab79c827365
* Content: [Extract, transform, and load (ETL) using HDInsight - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/extract-transform-and-load-using-hdinsight)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/extract-transform-and-load-using-hdinsight.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/extract-transform-and-load-using-hdinsight.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,details i would love to know more about the architectural details of extract transform and load etl using hdinsight code samples nonfunctional requirements functional requirements thanks regards document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10667,27235253274.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-21 15:53:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Update on availability?,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Is Alliance Connect Virtual now GA? We're now into 2023 but the banner message still states it's expected for GA in 2022.
If it is GA where can I find more information on how to implement?
Quote text from banner:
""This article provides an overview with reference architecture for deploying SWIFT's Alliance Connect Virtual solution on Azure. Please note that the new Alliance Connect Virtual solution is not yet available for SWIFT production traffic. The solution is currently being tested with SWIFT customers and will become generally available throughout 2022 as part of a phased launch. For more information about the general availability of the product, refer to [SWIFT.com](https://www.swift.com/our-solutions/interfaces-and-integration/alliance-connect-virtual)"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6ddcc2a5-2d06-5195-1c13-7b55e1584e01
* Version Independent ID: 6ddcc2a5-2d06-5195-1c13-7b55e1584e01
* Content: [SWIFT's Alliance Access with Alliance Connect Virtual in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/finance/swift-alliance-access-vsrx-on-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/finance/swift-alliance-access-vsrx-on-azure.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/finance/swift-alliance-access-vsrx-on-azure.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @Mahesh-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **maksh**",1.0,"Update on availability? - Is Alliance Connect Virtual now GA? We're now into 2023 but the banner message still states it's expected for GA in 2022.
If it is GA where can I find more information on how to implement?
Quote text from banner:
""This article provides an overview with reference architecture for deploying SWIFT's Alliance Connect Virtual solution on Azure. Please note that the new Alliance Connect Virtual solution is not yet available for SWIFT production traffic. The solution is currently being tested with SWIFT customers and will become generally available throughout 2022 as part of a phased launch. For more information about the general availability of the product, refer to [SWIFT.com](https://www.swift.com/our-solutions/interfaces-and-integration/alliance-connect-virtual)"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6ddcc2a5-2d06-5195-1c13-7b55e1584e01
* Version Independent ID: 6ddcc2a5-2d06-5195-1c13-7b55e1584e01
* Content: [SWIFT's Alliance Access with Alliance Connect Virtual in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/finance/swift-alliance-access-vsrx-on-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/finance/swift-alliance-access-vsrx-on-azure.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/finance/swift-alliance-access-vsrx-on-azure.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @Mahesh-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **maksh**",1,update on availability is alliance connect virtual now ga we re now into but the banner message still states it s expected for ga in if it is ga where can i find more information on how to implement quote text from banner this article provides an overview with reference architecture for deploying swift s alliance connect virtual solution on azure please note that the new alliance connect virtual solution is not yet available for swift production traffic the solution is currently being tested with swift customers and will become generally available throughout as part of a phased launch for more information about the general availability of the product refer to document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login mahesh msft microsoft alias maksh ,1
9674,25017963844.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:40:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incorrect caption in image,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"In the initial image on this page, section 5 is given in the key as ""user access"" but in the image is labelled as ""admin access"". Admin access is actually a separate section on the right hand side of the image, which is correctly labelled.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Incorrect caption in image - In the initial image on this page, section 5 is given in the key as ""user access"" but in the image is labelled as ""admin access"". Admin access is actually a separate section on the right hand side of the image, which is correctly labelled.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,incorrect caption in image in the initial image on this page section is given in the key as user access but in the image is labelled as admin access admin access is actually a separate section on the right hand side of the image which is correctly labelled document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10273,26645552014.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-25 09:41:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Application Gateway hub/spoke,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"What is the motivation for having the App Gateway in the Spoke and not in the Hub? Shouldn't we have all traffic direct to Hub and from there to the Spoke?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3c9cfb32-2013-f31e-0209-d5194afc8d9e
* Version Independent ID: 9cabc767-9799-abcd-6ccd-11f164c30877
* Content: [Architecture of an AKS regulated cluster for PCI-DSS 3.2.1 - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",2.0,"Application Gateway hub/spoke - What is the motivation for having the App Gateway in the Spoke and not in the Hub? Shouldn't we have all traffic direct to Hub and from there to the Spoke?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3c9cfb32-2013-f31e-0209-d5194afc8d9e
* Version Independent ID: 9cabc767-9799-abcd-6ccd-11f164c30877
* Content: [Architecture of an AKS regulated cluster for PCI-DSS 3.2.1 - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",1,application gateway hub spoke what is the motivation for having the app gateway in the spoke and not in the hub shouldn t we have all traffic direct to hub and from there to the spoke document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id abcd content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias prwilk ,1
7274,17288114266.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-24 05:50:52,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken link,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author design-pattern/subsvc doc-bug triaged,"The link for ""**Asynchronous operations in REST**"" in **Next Steps** is not available anymore.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @WillEastbury
* Microsoft Alias: **wieastbu**",1.0,"Broken link - The link for ""**Asynchronous operations in REST**"" in **Next Steps** is not available anymore.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @WillEastbury
* Microsoft Alias: **wieastbu**",1,broken link the link for asynchronous operations in rest in next steps is not available anymore document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login willeastbury microsoft alias wieastbu ,1
4956,11886795283.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-27 23:00:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,No mention of the case where parameter of object type is optional,Pri2 architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc,"Using the example given at the start of the article, what if parameter `VNetSettings` was optional and was omitted or set to an empty object during template generation. Would `[parameters('VNetSettings').name]` resolve to empty string or would it throw a validation error?
```
""resources"": [
{
""apiVersion"": ""2015-06-15"",
""type"": ""Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks"",
""name"": ""[parameters('VNetSettings').name]"",
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa870d42-1b00-d600-4fef-dd67219a1dc6
* Version Independent ID: 61fa68a5-a08b-7693-ebfd-18711ebd1bbb
* Content: [Use an object as a parameter in an Azure Resource Manager template - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @petertay
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"No mention of the case where parameter of object type is optional - Using the example given at the start of the article, what if parameter `VNetSettings` was optional and was omitted or set to an empty object during template generation. Would `[parameters('VNetSettings').name]` resolve to empty string or would it throw a validation error?
```
""resources"": [
{
""apiVersion"": ""2015-06-15"",
""type"": ""Microsoft.Network/virtualNetworks"",
""name"": ""[parameters('VNetSettings').name]"",
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa870d42-1b00-d600-4fef-dd67219a1dc6
* Version Independent ID: 61fa68a5-a08b-7693-ebfd-18711ebd1bbb
* Content: [Use an object as a parameter in an Azure Resource Manager template - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @petertay
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,no mention of the case where parameter of object type is optional using the example given at the start of the article what if parameter vnetsettings was optional and was omitted or set to an empty object during template generation would resolve to empty string or would it throw a validation error resources apiversion type microsoft network virtualnetworks name document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id ebfd content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login petertay microsoft alias pnp ,1
5783,13159999211.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-10 16:47:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AKS - Implementation details Request,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-idea solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"AKS - Implementation details Request -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,aks implementation details request document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10689,27297324584.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-23 21:35:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken: Advanced Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) microservices architecture,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"GitHub logo A reference implementation of this architecture is available on GitHub.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices-advanced
Another URL to an architecture document, that i need, that is not there. Where can I find the visio file?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c9e5ee22-d60b-7f75-5c7c-6527032f33f7
* Version Independent ID: 72c0059f-72e1-551b-b37b-0cbb09b52ebc
* Content: [Advanced Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) microservices architecture - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices-advanced)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices-advanced.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices-advanced.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Broken: Advanced Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) microservices architecture - GitHub logo A reference implementation of this architecture is available on GitHub.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices-advanced
Another URL to an architecture document, that i need, that is not there. Where can I find the visio file?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c9e5ee22-d60b-7f75-5c7c-6527032f33f7
* Version Independent ID: 72c0059f-72e1-551b-b37b-0cbb09b52ebc
* Content: [Advanced Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) microservices architecture - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices-advanced)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices-advanced.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices-advanced.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,broken advanced azure kubernetes service aks microservices architecture github logo a reference implementation of this architecture is available on github another url to an architecture document that i need that is not there where can i find the visio file document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
4946,11866562784.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-26 04:08:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Please update the information in ""Use Azure Backup to create cross region backups that are application consistent"" ",Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"According to the backup team, with the azure backup service, users can only restore VM’s/Disks to the same region as the backed up VM. So even though they may be using geo-replicated storage, they cannot leverage that to initiate a restore in the partner region.
It contradicts the information in this document. Could you please update accordingly? Thank you.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b31c85c7-c25d-897f-e52d-789f7306457b
* Version Independent ID: 969106a5-df35-afef-5afc-96a26c970f44
* Content: [Recover from loss of an Azure region](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @adamglick
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please update the information in ""Use Azure Backup to create cross region backups that are application consistent"" - According to the backup team, with the azure backup service, users can only restore VM’s/Disks to the same region as the backed up VM. So even though they may be using geo-replicated storage, they cannot leverage that to initiate a restore in the partner region.
It contradicts the information in this document. Could you please update accordingly? Thank you.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b31c85c7-c25d-897f-e52d-789f7306457b
* Version Independent ID: 969106a5-df35-afef-5afc-96a26c970f44
* Content: [Recover from loss of an Azure region](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/resiliency/recovery-loss-azure-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @adamglick
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please update the information in use azure backup to create cross region backups that are application consistent according to the backup team with the azure backup service users can only restore vm’s disks to the same region as the backed up vm so even though they may be using geo replicated storage they cannot leverage that to initiate a restore in the partner region it contradicts the information in this document could you please update accordingly thank you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afef content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login adamglick microsoft alias pnp ,1
9724,25104809841.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:55:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AWS AppMesh equivalent of OSM+Dapr,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"
Service Fabric Mesh sound old, MSstrategy is now around Dapr+Open Service Mesh
Please update the docs accordingly
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e0ef54ba-28f9-bf3d-214d-d15ff2595a55
* Version Independent ID: 2c9fabc5-0288-ce98-a906-0dcc720f0c7f
* Content: [Comparing AWS and Azure compute services - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/compute)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/compute.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/compute.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"AWS AppMesh equivalent of OSM+Dapr -
Service Fabric Mesh sound old, MSstrategy is now around Dapr+Open Service Mesh
Please update the docs accordingly
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e0ef54ba-28f9-bf3d-214d-d15ff2595a55
* Version Independent ID: 2c9fabc5-0288-ce98-a906-0dcc720f0c7f
* Content: [Comparing AWS and Azure compute services - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/compute)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/compute.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/compute.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,aws appmesh equivalent of osm dapr service fabric mesh sound old msstrategy is now around dapr open service mesh please update the docs accordingly document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4786,11701571112.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-06 19:58:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,link is not working ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"https://github.com/Azure/MachineLearningNotebooks/blob/master/how-to-use-azureml/training-with-deep-learning/tensorboard/tensorboard.ipynb
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 650239f8-0c0f-aeca-a8ff-f74a03b15e61
* Version Independent ID: 3bbf5d1a-0be8-e8a9-318b-71dfcdc336bf
* Content: [Distributed training of deep learning models on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/training-deep-learning#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/training-deep-learning.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/training-deep-learning.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @msalvaris
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"link is not working - https://github.com/Azure/MachineLearningNotebooks/blob/master/how-to-use-azureml/training-with-deep-learning/tensorboard/tensorboard.ipynb
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 650239f8-0c0f-aeca-a8ff-f74a03b15e61
* Version Independent ID: 3bbf5d1a-0be8-e8a9-318b-71dfcdc336bf
* Content: [Distributed training of deep learning models on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/training-deep-learning#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/training-deep-learning.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/training-deep-learning.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @msalvaris
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,link is not working document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id aeca version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login msalvaris microsoft alias pnp ,1
10461,26992692733.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-09 21:20:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,A sample project for the cloud design patterns,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 design-pattern/subsvc,"
Would you please provide a code sample that includes all the cloud design patterns?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 64e99886-d5c7-ca7c-6943-ee31cfc39902
* Version Independent ID: 04021af5-10a9-b600-5f44-354d0c0e50c9
* Content: [Ambassador pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/ambassador)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/ambassador.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/ambassador.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"A sample project for the cloud design patterns -
Would you please provide a code sample that includes all the cloud design patterns?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 64e99886-d5c7-ca7c-6943-ee31cfc39902
* Version Independent ID: 04021af5-10a9-b600-5f44-354d0c0e50c9
* Content: [Ambassador pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/ambassador)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/ambassador.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/ambassador.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,a sample project for the cloud design patterns would you please provide a code sample that includes all the cloud design patterns document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
9132,24059705948.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 20:47:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Wrong IP value for the default DNS server used by spoke VNET ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
In the WorkFlow part for the private DNS resolver section, we have these lines :
""All Azure spoke virtual networks use the default Azure DNS server at the IP address 192.63.129.16. All spoke networks are peered with the hub virtual network.""
The IP address 192.63.129.16 is not the Azure default DNS, this may confuse the client, we may need to replace this lime with the Azure default DNS ""168.63.129.16""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Version Independent ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Content: [Azure DNS Private Resolver - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @moorthyannadurai
* Microsoft Alias: **moannadu**",1.0,"Wrong IP value for the default DNS server used by spoke VNET -
In the WorkFlow part for the private DNS resolver section, we have these lines :
""All Azure spoke virtual networks use the default Azure DNS server at the IP address 192.63.129.16. All spoke networks are peered with the hub virtual network.""
The IP address 192.63.129.16 is not the Azure default DNS, this may confuse the client, we may need to replace this lime with the Azure default DNS ""168.63.129.16""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Version Independent ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Content: [Azure DNS Private Resolver - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @moorthyannadurai
* Microsoft Alias: **moannadu**",1,wrong ip value for the default dns server used by spoke vnet in the workflow part for the private dns resolver section we have these lines all azure spoke virtual networks use the default azure dns server at the ip address all spoke networks are peered with the hub virtual network the ip address is not the azure default dns this may confuse the client we may need to replace this lime with the azure default dns document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login moorthyannadurai microsoft alias moannadu ,1
10628,27168745704.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 17:23:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Bug - Table of Content Options,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 azure-guide/subsvc,"## Root Cause
Source Code: [docs/toc.yml](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/c13102196d67c4c476dbc376e94d664a4fb5df4b/docs/toc.yml#L67)
Website: [azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#:~:text=Choose%20a%20Kubernetes%20edge%20option)
## What Happens
0. Go to [Azure Architecture's Technology Choices Table of Content Panel](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#:~:text=Choose%20a%20Kubernetes%20edge%20option)
1. User selects `Choose a Kubernetes edge option` [1]
2. Users browser is directed to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ [2]
## Browser Information
Google Chrome | 98.0.4758.80 (Official Build) (64-bit)
-- | --
Revision | 7f0488e8ba0d8e019187c6325a16c29d9b7f4989-refs/branch-heads/4758@{#972}
OS | Linux
JavaScript | V8 9.8.177.9
User Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/98.0.4758.80 Safari/537.36
Command Line | /usr/bin/google-chrome-stable --enable-crashpad --flag-switches-begin --sync-url=https://chrome-sync.sandbox.google.com/chrome-sync/alpha --enable-features=Vulkan --disable-features=HardwareMediaKeyHandling --flag-switches-end
Executable Path | /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome
Profile Path | /home/josephmcasey/.config/google-chrome/Profile 11
Variations | f475deb0-377be55a313957be-ca7d8d803e7d7783-ca7d8d807e184ca7-33c3eba590a7075b-362044e7a112f012-ca7d8d8016b16054-377be55a59b6f412-377be55a60d4b352-377be55a273268f8-17797c246cb5e962-377be55aa77166f2-ca7d8d806e08fc3e-ca7d8d80481fc7e7-12ede6a23e09e9b1-ca7d8d80eddd0d82-21e0edc789a16501-ca7d8d8087f33ad6-ca7d8d8074f8fa8f-ca7d8d803095aa95-3f4a17df34e1db5c-377be55a4662e1aa-ca7d8d80a257327f-ca7d8d806cbcf5b7-6edc92c76c5f69af-377be55a47bd2c48-377be55a1e940a7c-ca7d8d8044c2e2c0-ca7d8d804701a278-f23d1dea4749874c-fe2c00b67c2504d0-ca7d8d80ab544014-ca7d8d803f6e921e-377be55a7f122175-ca7d8d804e3ec83a-ca7d8d8065570806-20f58b6fb507d18e-ca7d8d8053fd5552-12ede6a2dd8d67e-1f8c5973f6f5c542-12ede6a2a582a1b8-ad75ce17fa659f2e-377be55ada2d8531-ca7d8d80e87da360-377be55a6a5f15b-377be55a1d606bb5-cdda86d5d89faab1-377be55a722b8030-874626a33042ad4b-5bbb3702ba47366-ca7d8d80248c3fbd-ca7d8d806668be8b-a22c9c1dd7a036b9-ca7d8d8073645b32-ca7d8d80e79de56c-ca7d8d80357a64de-ca7d8d808bccc03b-ca7d8d8029c62d4-ca7d8d80551dab91-ca7d8d8069d4ebd5-ca7d8d802b4e7fda-b80d0b98b012722b-6edc92c7727723f1-946682d3b75782da-ca7d8d808c8d8faf-1f8c5973ca51d624-ca7d8d80f7a3ec9-ca7d8d80ca5a2953-ca7d8d808bfdd36f-7ef85c8e5fe247df-ca7d8d80ad46906e-ca7d8d80234de0a0-ca7d8d80d3566fbd-377be55a4ea303a6-ecbb250efc7e4d22-ca7d8d802e0ef3d0-df7317d7c9e4cf65-12ede6a22d5bcfa8-377be55a950809af-377be55a77e44b8e-377be55a6de6716f-ca7d8d80fbe267b5-ca7d8d80e8c68789-ca7d8d8054410569-ca7d8d80ad4acdda-ca7d8d80931c5f72-5c0c1f00494d8760-52325d437b2873c2-f9e346373ac60855-486e2a9cf48c01d3-dccc52f863dcb6a3-75dc9252e706e746-eaceac83f296190c-2624949d4442aae2-6e597edef690cf64-75cb33fced1d377-e1cc0f1475f0f0a0-e1cc0f14e2b18481-a90023b1e7e71889-e1cc0f14b1ceb06f-d137233432d6b1fe-ca7d8d802d3dfd19-ca7d8d80762bb3b2-ca7d8d80e1368496-377be55a6becb1e-12ede6a2248e3a0-ca7d8d804ebfaf88-12ede6a2595f5eb0-ca7d8d809e91ce29-ca7d8d80e3969921-ca7d8d803673692f-ca7d8d80653036a-ca7d8d80bef5c006-ca7d8d80a16ee973-3a0600b9b4e05be7-9c7cf9bf662773da-39e85e9bc3859e82-a22067f8def27776-ca7d8d80733cb831-377be55ab53f3ef9-ca7d8d802856aa31-a6c00ad8
## Screenshots
**[1]**
**[2]**
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Bug - Table of Content Options - ## Root Cause
Source Code: [docs/toc.yml](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/c13102196d67c4c476dbc376e94d664a4fb5df4b/docs/toc.yml#L67)
Website: [azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#:~:text=Choose%20a%20Kubernetes%20edge%20option)
## What Happens
0. Go to [Azure Architecture's Technology Choices Table of Content Panel](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#:~:text=Choose%20a%20Kubernetes%20edge%20option)
1. User selects `Choose a Kubernetes edge option` [1]
2. Users browser is directed to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/ [2]
## Browser Information
Google Chrome | 98.0.4758.80 (Official Build) (64-bit)
-- | --
Revision | 7f0488e8ba0d8e019187c6325a16c29d9b7f4989-refs/branch-heads/4758@{#972}
OS | Linux
JavaScript | V8 9.8.177.9
User Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/98.0.4758.80 Safari/537.36
Command Line | /usr/bin/google-chrome-stable --enable-crashpad --flag-switches-begin --sync-url=https://chrome-sync.sandbox.google.com/chrome-sync/alpha --enable-features=Vulkan --disable-features=HardwareMediaKeyHandling --flag-switches-end
Executable Path | /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome
Profile Path | /home/josephmcasey/.config/google-chrome/Profile 11
Variations | f475deb0-377be55a313957be-ca7d8d803e7d7783-ca7d8d807e184ca7-33c3eba590a7075b-362044e7a112f012-ca7d8d8016b16054-377be55a59b6f412-377be55a60d4b352-377be55a273268f8-17797c246cb5e962-377be55aa77166f2-ca7d8d806e08fc3e-ca7d8d80481fc7e7-12ede6a23e09e9b1-ca7d8d80eddd0d82-21e0edc789a16501-ca7d8d8087f33ad6-ca7d8d8074f8fa8f-ca7d8d803095aa95-3f4a17df34e1db5c-377be55a4662e1aa-ca7d8d80a257327f-ca7d8d806cbcf5b7-6edc92c76c5f69af-377be55a47bd2c48-377be55a1e940a7c-ca7d8d8044c2e2c0-ca7d8d804701a278-f23d1dea4749874c-fe2c00b67c2504d0-ca7d8d80ab544014-ca7d8d803f6e921e-377be55a7f122175-ca7d8d804e3ec83a-ca7d8d8065570806-20f58b6fb507d18e-ca7d8d8053fd5552-12ede6a2dd8d67e-1f8c5973f6f5c542-12ede6a2a582a1b8-ad75ce17fa659f2e-377be55ada2d8531-ca7d8d80e87da360-377be55a6a5f15b-377be55a1d606bb5-cdda86d5d89faab1-377be55a722b8030-874626a33042ad4b-5bbb3702ba47366-ca7d8d80248c3fbd-ca7d8d806668be8b-a22c9c1dd7a036b9-ca7d8d8073645b32-ca7d8d80e79de56c-ca7d8d80357a64de-ca7d8d808bccc03b-ca7d8d8029c62d4-ca7d8d80551dab91-ca7d8d8069d4ebd5-ca7d8d802b4e7fda-b80d0b98b012722b-6edc92c7727723f1-946682d3b75782da-ca7d8d808c8d8faf-1f8c5973ca51d624-ca7d8d80f7a3ec9-ca7d8d80ca5a2953-ca7d8d808bfdd36f-7ef85c8e5fe247df-ca7d8d80ad46906e-ca7d8d80234de0a0-ca7d8d80d3566fbd-377be55a4ea303a6-ecbb250efc7e4d22-ca7d8d802e0ef3d0-df7317d7c9e4cf65-12ede6a22d5bcfa8-377be55a950809af-377be55a77e44b8e-377be55a6de6716f-ca7d8d80fbe267b5-ca7d8d80e8c68789-ca7d8d8054410569-ca7d8d80ad4acdda-ca7d8d80931c5f72-5c0c1f00494d8760-52325d437b2873c2-f9e346373ac60855-486e2a9cf48c01d3-dccc52f863dcb6a3-75dc9252e706e746-eaceac83f296190c-2624949d4442aae2-6e597edef690cf64-75cb33fced1d377-e1cc0f1475f0f0a0-e1cc0f14e2b18481-a90023b1e7e71889-e1cc0f14b1ceb06f-d137233432d6b1fe-ca7d8d802d3dfd19-ca7d8d80762bb3b2-ca7d8d80e1368496-377be55a6becb1e-12ede6a2248e3a0-ca7d8d804ebfaf88-12ede6a2595f5eb0-ca7d8d809e91ce29-ca7d8d80e3969921-ca7d8d803673692f-ca7d8d80653036a-ca7d8d80bef5c006-ca7d8d80a16ee973-3a0600b9b4e05be7-9c7cf9bf662773da-39e85e9bc3859e82-a22067f8def27776-ca7d8d80733cb831-377be55ab53f3ef9-ca7d8d802856aa31-a6c00ad8
## Screenshots
**[1]**
**[2]**
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,bug table of content options root cause source code website what happens go to user selects choose a kubernetes edge option users browser is directed to browser information google chrome official build bit revision refs branch heads os linux javascript user agent mozilla linux applewebkit khtml like gecko chrome safari command line usr bin google chrome stable enable crashpad flag switches begin sync url enable features vulkan disable features hardwaremediakeyhandling flag switches end executable path opt google chrome google chrome profile path home josephmcasey config google chrome profile variations screenshots document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
11194,28369356919.0,IssuesEvent,2023-04-12 15:51:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Regional failures or Data Center failures?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/test-best-practices#plan-for-regional-failures
Does this paragraph intent to say ""Plan for regional failures"" or ""Plan for data center failures""? Azure has Regions that have multiple Availability Zones. Should we plan for one of those Zones (= one data center) to go down, or should we really plan for an entire Region to go down (even when it has more than one Availability Zone)?
Thank you
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b9f97257-6e02-a0d4-c428-65fcdfbbd46c
* Version Independent ID: bccfa781-32f2-7651-7c6e-45f241cbc92b
* Content: [Testing best practices for reliability in Azure applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/test-best-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/test-best-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/test-best-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-aangie
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Regional failures or Data Center failures? - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/test-best-practices#plan-for-regional-failures
Does this paragraph intent to say ""Plan for regional failures"" or ""Plan for data center failures""? Azure has Regions that have multiple Availability Zones. Should we plan for one of those Zones (= one data center) to go down, or should we really plan for an entire Region to go down (even when it has more than one Availability Zone)?
Thank you
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b9f97257-6e02-a0d4-c428-65fcdfbbd46c
* Version Independent ID: bccfa781-32f2-7651-7c6e-45f241cbc92b
* Content: [Testing best practices for reliability in Azure applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/test-best-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/test-best-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/test-best-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-aangie
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,regional failures or data center failures does this paragraph intent to say plan for regional failures or plan for data center failures azure has regions that have multiple availability zones should we plan for one of those zones one data center to go down or should we really plan for an entire region to go down even when it has more than one availability zone thank you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login v aangie microsoft alias pnp ,1
4286,10861535569.0,IssuesEvent,2019-11-14 11:17:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SQL Data Warehouse supports Dynamic data masking ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"SQL Data Warehouse supports Dynamic data masking : https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-dynamic-data-masking-get-started#set-up-dynamic-data-masking-for-your-database-using-powershell-cmdlets
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bba35cbb-4160-0b5d-6829-103b25ad6ce9
* Version Independent ID: fa12ea8e-401a-9567-7b35-ffff532a99b6
* Content: [Choosing a batch processing technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"SQL Data Warehouse supports Dynamic data masking - SQL Data Warehouse supports Dynamic data masking : https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/sql-database/sql-database-dynamic-data-masking-get-started#set-up-dynamic-data-masking-for-your-database-using-powershell-cmdlets
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bba35cbb-4160-0b5d-6829-103b25ad6ce9
* Version Independent ID: fa12ea8e-401a-9567-7b35-ffff532a99b6
* Content: [Choosing a batch processing technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,sql data warehouse supports dynamic data masking sql data warehouse supports dynamic data masking document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
10691,27297369676.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-23 21:38:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Replace Windows Virtual Desktop with Azure Virtual Desktop ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
There are still some references to WVD.
Replace Windows Virtual Desktop with Azure Virtual Desktop
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Azure Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1.0,"Replace Windows Virtual Desktop with Azure Virtual Desktop -
[Enter feedback here]
There are still some references to WVD.
Replace Windows Virtual Desktop with Azure Virtual Desktop
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Azure Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1,replace windows virtual desktop with azure virtual desktop there are still some references to wvd replace windows virtual desktop with azure virtual desktop document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login tomhickling microsoft alias thhickli ,1
3791,10143306291.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-04 10:57:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Vnet peering transitivity is allowed,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Feature was released in April. I've done it in my labs
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Vnet peering transitivity is allowed - Feature was released in April. I've done it in my labs
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,vnet peering transitivity is allowed feature was released in april i ve done it in my labs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
5473,12543953875.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-05 16:24:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Typo in Reference Architecture,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cxp doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"In the reference architecture diagram for the first step it mentions as Azure Data Lake Storage but in the Data Flow step 1 it mentions as Azure Blob Storage.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Typo in Reference Architecture - In the reference architecture diagram for the first step it mentions as Azure Data Lake Storage but in the Data Flow step 1 it mentions as Azure Blob Storage.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo in reference architecture in the reference architecture diagram for the first step it mentions as azure data lake storage but in the data flow step it mentions as azure blob storage document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9109,24052095101.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 13:40:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Need these in an easy to import format,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"I should not have to add each icon manuall, then rename into a new stencil set in Visio. Azure and Visio have both been around long enough that these should:
A. Already be an icon set in Visio nativly instead of having to download the zip file
B. At least have a stencil set available to ease the import of the hundreds of new icons into Visio.
Having to manually add and rename each icon is less than a productive use of my time and effort.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Need these in an easy to import format - I should not have to add each icon manuall, then rename into a new stencil set in Visio. Azure and Visio have both been around long enough that these should:
A. Already be an icon set in Visio nativly instead of having to download the zip file
B. At least have a stencil set available to ease the import of the hundreds of new icons into Visio.
Having to manually add and rename each icon is less than a productive use of my time and effort.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,need these in an easy to import format i should not have to add each icon manuall then rename into a new stencil set in visio azure and visio have both been around long enough that these should a already be an icon set in visio nativly instead of having to download the zip file b at least have a stencil set available to ease the import of the hundreds of new icons into visio having to manually add and rename each icon is less than a productive use of my time and effort document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6250,14006472061.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-28 20:00:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Oracle database migration overview,Pri2 architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc product-question triaged,"In the Migration decision tree I don't see the option to migrate Oracle databases to SQL Server Azure VM. Is this option for migration not recommended for customers ? I have a customer who is looking to migrate the Oracle databases for their Deltek Costpoint and Kronos (ERP systems), so I was thinking if SQL on Azure VM is a potential migration path for them but I don't see it in the decision tree.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0676437-a746-19de-2df2-7919004a14f0
* Version Independent ID: 35cfce4b-fc76-f140-02fb-9ac605157313
* Content: [Overview of Oracle database migration - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @amberz
* Microsoft Alias: **amberz**",1.0,"Oracle database migration overview - In the Migration decision tree I don't see the option to migrate Oracle databases to SQL Server Azure VM. Is this option for migration not recommended for customers ? I have a customer who is looking to migrate the Oracle databases for their Deltek Costpoint and Kronos (ERP systems), so I was thinking if SQL on Azure VM is a potential migration path for them but I don't see it in the decision tree.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0676437-a746-19de-2df2-7919004a14f0
* Version Independent ID: 35cfce4b-fc76-f140-02fb-9ac605157313
* Content: [Overview of Oracle database migration - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @amberz
* Microsoft Alias: **amberz**",1,oracle database migration overview in the migration decision tree i don t see the option to migrate oracle databases to sql server azure vm is this option for migration not recommended for customers i have a customer who is looking to migrate the oracle databases for their deltek costpoint and kronos erp systems so i was thinking if sql on azure vm is a potential migration path for them but i don t see it in the decision tree document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login amberz microsoft alias amberz ,1
9633,24937232940.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-31 16:00:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Diagram contains ""Web Front End"" instead of ""Back End""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"Logical diagram of Web-Queue-Worker contains ""Web Front End"" block. I think it should be ""Back End"" instead.
Reasoning:
Let's say i have React on Frontend, Golang on Backend.
According to the diagram i should open connection to Database directly from Frontend(React). Doesn't sound good to me.
At the same time, connection to DB from Backend(Golang) is perfectly OK.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 495b2ac1-3a9c-d1db-2b46-bbfbd0a4b538
* Version Independent ID: 2f6008fa-9b45-6ce1-13b5-74f82550f715
* Content: [Web-Queue-Worker architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Diagram contains ""Web Front End"" instead of ""Back End"" - Logical diagram of Web-Queue-Worker contains ""Web Front End"" block. I think it should be ""Back End"" instead.
Reasoning:
Let's say i have React on Frontend, Golang on Backend.
According to the diagram i should open connection to Database directly from Frontend(React). Doesn't sound good to me.
At the same time, connection to DB from Backend(Golang) is perfectly OK.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 495b2ac1-3a9c-d1db-2b46-bbfbd0a4b538
* Version Independent ID: 2f6008fa-9b45-6ce1-13b5-74f82550f715
* Content: [Web-Queue-Worker architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,diagram contains web front end instead of back end logical diagram of web queue worker contains web front end block i think it should be back end instead reasoning let s say i have react on frontend golang on backend according to the diagram i should open connection to database directly from frontend react doesn t sound good to me at the same time connection to db from backend golang is perfectly ok document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6040,13542348831.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 17:12:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,What about Azure reservations and Azure hybrid benefits to save costs? That should be mentioned on these docs....? ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author triaged well-architected/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ff40c714-9fda-c2ac-0a3c-63c246a9b773
* Version Independent ID: 6d3e4e6e-3a65-c181-7d45-90a59013e756
* Content: [Principles of cost optimization - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/overview)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"What about Azure reservations and Azure hybrid benefits to save costs? That should be mentioned on these docs....? -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ff40c714-9fda-c2ac-0a3c-63c246a9b773
* Version Independent ID: 6d3e4e6e-3a65-c181-7d45-90a59013e756
* Content: [Principles of cost optimization - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/overview)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,what about azure reservations and azure hybrid benefits to save costs that should be mentioned on these docs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
3901,10256534984.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-21 17:54:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""Plan"" button at the bottom links to Strategy page",Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"The ""Plan"" button at the bottom links to Strategy page. This should probably link to the overview of the ""Plan"" section.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 218b42ff-1cf2-c31c-1a1a-59625eb9e09e
* Version Independent ID: ab742d17-9eba-2daa-c4fc-50b17a1e0eba
* Content: [Getting started with a cloud migration journey - Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework for Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/cloud-adoption/getting-started/migrate)
* Content Source: [docs/cloud-adoption/getting-started/migrate.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/cloud-adoption/getting-started/migrate.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @BrianBlanchard
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"""Plan"" button at the bottom links to Strategy page - The ""Plan"" button at the bottom links to Strategy page. This should probably link to the overview of the ""Plan"" section.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 218b42ff-1cf2-c31c-1a1a-59625eb9e09e
* Version Independent ID: ab742d17-9eba-2daa-c4fc-50b17a1e0eba
* Content: [Getting started with a cloud migration journey - Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework for Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/cloud-adoption/getting-started/migrate)
* Content Source: [docs/cloud-adoption/getting-started/migrate.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/cloud-adoption/getting-started/migrate.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @BrianBlanchard
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, plan button at the bottom links to strategy page the plan button at the bottom links to strategy page this should probably link to the overview of the plan section document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login brianblanchard microsoft alias pnp ,1
5366,12400157088.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-21 07:12:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Details and implementation steps needed to try out in a sandbox environment,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Need details and Implementation Blue prints to try out in a sandbox environment.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Details and implementation steps needed to try out in a sandbox environment - Need details and Implementation Blue prints to try out in a sandbox environment.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,details and implementation steps needed to try out in a sandbox environment need details and implementation blue prints to try out in a sandbox environment document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
6305,14147468860.0,IssuesEvent,2020-11-10 20:51:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio is not valid,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hi Team,
The reference architecture visio diagram doesnt contain anything. Please upload valid one.
https://archcenter.blob.core.windows.net/cdn/azure-stack-vm-dr.vsdx
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7004da9f-5b68-9962-2bfb-628e66052c9e
* Version Independent ID: c2e11625-cc3a-2fe0-28c4-6ab2f26f227a
* Content: [Disaster Recovery for Azure Stack Hub virtual machines - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/azure-stack-vm-dr)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/azure-stack-vm-dr.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/hybrid/azure-stack-vm-dr.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Visio is not valid -
[Enter feedback here]
Hi Team,
The reference architecture visio diagram doesnt contain anything. Please upload valid one.
https://archcenter.blob.core.windows.net/cdn/azure-stack-vm-dr.vsdx
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7004da9f-5b68-9962-2bfb-628e66052c9e
* Version Independent ID: c2e11625-cc3a-2fe0-28c4-6ab2f26f227a
* Content: [Disaster Recovery for Azure Stack Hub virtual machines - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/azure-stack-vm-dr)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/azure-stack-vm-dr.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/hybrid/azure-stack-vm-dr.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio is not valid hi team the reference architecture visio diagram doesnt contain anything please upload valid one document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5054,11996712084.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-08 17:14:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mismatch in Architecture Diagram and Data Flow Steps. ,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"I observe that the Data Flow is not following the Architecture Diagram as shown. The numbering seems to be off.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9ed7b54c-fe6b-4331-f6d4-1e369ebad0c1
* Version Independent ID: 70f614a9-153c-3a7e-107c-526ba68adad6
* Content: [Supply Chain Track and Trace - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Mismatch in Architecture Diagram and Data Flow Steps. - I observe that the Data Flow is not following the Architecture Diagram as shown. The numbering seems to be off.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9ed7b54c-fe6b-4331-f6d4-1e369ebad0c1
* Version Independent ID: 70f614a9-153c-3a7e-107c-526ba68adad6
* Content: [Supply Chain Track and Trace - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,mismatch in architecture diagram and data flow steps i observe that the data flow is not following the architecture diagram as shown the numbering seems to be off document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10360,26838083164.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 21:20:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Riesgo crediticio y modelo predeterminado PowerBi,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"Hi, I need more information about
https://docs.microsoft.com/es-es/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling
Riesgo crediticio y modelo predeterminado
---
#### Detalles del documento
⚠ *No edite esta sección. Se requiere para docs.microsoft.com ➟ Vinculación de problema de GitHub.*
* ID: ed6476ec-ceb9-cb1a-92dd-5dbe50b729a0
* Version Independent ID: 0081a02f-b8d0-0945-51e7-a9a53c47f66d
* Content: [Riesgo crediticio y modelo predeterminado - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/es-es/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Riesgo crediticio y modelo predeterminado PowerBi - Hi, I need more information about
https://docs.microsoft.com/es-es/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling
Riesgo crediticio y modelo predeterminado
---
#### Detalles del documento
⚠ *No edite esta sección. Se requiere para docs.microsoft.com ➟ Vinculación de problema de GitHub.*
* ID: ed6476ec-ceb9-cb1a-92dd-5dbe50b729a0
* Version Independent ID: 0081a02f-b8d0-0945-51e7-a9a53c47f66d
* Content: [Riesgo crediticio y modelo predeterminado - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/es-es/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,riesgo crediticio y modelo predeterminado powerbi hi i need more information about riesgo crediticio y modelo predeterminado detalles del documento ⚠ no edite esta sección se requiere para docs microsoft com ➟ vinculación de problema de github id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
8043,20732343371.0,IssuesEvent,2022-03-14 10:35:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""Azure Virtual Desktop control plane"" is there a typo about panel or plane?",architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
""Azure Virtual Desktop control plane""
I coundt find sometnig called ""control plane"", is there a typo on this one?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Azure Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1.0,"""Azure Virtual Desktop control plane"" is there a typo about panel or plane? -
""Azure Virtual Desktop control plane""
I coundt find sometnig called ""control plane"", is there a typo on this one?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Azure Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1, azure virtual desktop control plane is there a typo about panel or plane azure virtual desktop control plane i coundt find sometnig called control plane is there a typo on this one document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login tomhickling microsoft alias thhickli ,1
7001,16091029341.0,IssuesEvent,2021-04-26 16:42:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Consolidation across other pages,Pri2 architecture-center/svc guide/subsvc,"
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/considerations/data-options#identify-data-services-requirements
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree
Should we make this two refer the same thing, I see go things in each we can be merged into one.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 88559925-9b9e-d9b3-ddb6-08306692c17b
* Version Independent ID: a25055cb-7cfe-28a0-1c66-06172c037128
* Content: [Data store decision tree - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Consolidation across other pages -
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/considerations/data-options#identify-data-services-requirements
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree
Should we make this two refer the same thing, I see go things in each we can be merged into one.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 88559925-9b9e-d9b3-ddb6-08306692c17b
* Version Independent ID: a25055cb-7cfe-28a0-1c66-06172c037128
* Content: [Data store decision tree - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,consolidation across other pages should we make this two refer the same thing i see go things in each we can be merged into one document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dsk microsoft alias pnp ,1
10363,26838309086.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 21:32:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How are apps deployed?,assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
If we have classic ASP.NET web site and want to deploy them on Dev/QA environment, we should spell out how that installations happen along with VM creation?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 115fe9d4-6876-b76b-c194-6dbe760f0131
* Version Independent ID: bd2dbb27-a069-8609-5421-33d223df06eb
* Content: [DevTest and DevOps for IaaS solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"How are apps deployed? -
[Enter feedback here]
If we have classic ASP.NET web site and want to deploy them on Dev/QA environment, we should spell out how that installations happen along with VM creation?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 115fe9d4-6876-b76b-c194-6dbe760f0131
* Version Independent ID: bd2dbb27-a069-8609-5421-33d223df06eb
* Content: [DevTest and DevOps for IaaS solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,how are apps deployed if we have classic asp net web site and want to deploy them on dev qa environment we should spell out how that installations happen along with vm creation document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
3514,9696450714.0,IssuesEvent,2019-05-25 07:39:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Kafka Misspelled,architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-bug triaged,"Kafka is misspelled in the sentence ""Then it sends a notification message using Kakfa-enabled Event Hubs.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1970e0cd-53ae-02f6-479b-9ca386a5220e
* Version Independent ID: 8a81baa3-61c2-a8f6-540c-9a239583b8d6
* Content: [Claim-Check pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/claim-check#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/claim-check.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/claim-check.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @yorek
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Kafka Misspelled - Kafka is misspelled in the sentence ""Then it sends a notification message using Kakfa-enabled Event Hubs.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1970e0cd-53ae-02f6-479b-9ca386a5220e
* Version Independent ID: 8a81baa3-61c2-a8f6-540c-9a239583b8d6
* Content: [Claim-Check pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/claim-check#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/claim-check.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/claim-check.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @yorek
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,kafka misspelled kafka is misspelled in the sentence then it sends a notification message using kakfa enabled event hubs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login yorek microsoft alias pnp ,1
5014,11949949326.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-03 14:27:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can this page be updated with corresponding Azure service of below AWS services,Pri3 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Amazon Elasticsearch Service
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive
Amazon Simple Email Service
AWS CloudTrail
AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Data Transfer
AWS Elemental MediaConvert
Amazon Simple Queue Service
Amazon Simple Queue Service
AWS X-Ray
AWS Data Pipeline
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can this page be updated with corresponding Azure service of below AWS services - Amazon Elasticsearch Service
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive
Amazon Simple Email Service
AWS CloudTrail
AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Data Transfer
AWS Elemental MediaConvert
Amazon Simple Queue Service
Amazon Simple Queue Service
AWS X-Ray
AWS Data Pipeline
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can this page be updated with corresponding azure service of below aws services amazon elasticsearch service amazon kinesis amazon glacier deep archive amazon simple email service aws cloudtrail aws cost explorer aws data transfer aws elemental mediaconvert amazon simple queue service amazon simple queue service aws x ray aws data pipeline document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
9760,25161938708.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 17:27:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mentioning of Azure API Management is missing in this page,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"Why ""Azure API Management"" not included in this page?
Azure Application Gateway & Azure API Management are inter changeable though they are difference Azure Load balancing offering.
Some documentation about when to choose what between Azure Application Gateway & Azure API Management would be helpful.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**
* ",1.0,"Mentioning of Azure API Management is missing in this page - Why ""Azure API Management"" not included in this page?
Azure Application Gateway & Azure API Management are inter changeable though they are difference Azure Load balancing offering.
Some documentation about when to choose what between Azure Application Gateway & Azure API Management would be helpful.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**
* ",1,mentioning of azure api management is missing in this page why azure api management not included in this page azure application gateway azure api management are inter changeable though they are difference azure load balancing offering some documentation about when to choose what between azure application gateway azure api management would be helpful document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9513,24732919396.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-20 19:13:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Would like to see implementation for Modern analytics architecture with Azure Databricks,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"Would like to see implementation for this reference architecture
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7254782d-e773-b542-73e8-f568d3bbee39
* Version Independent ID: 40d81223-f8ea-2eec-616e-5f6ee28c8206
* Content: [Modern analytics architecture with Azure Databricks - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/azure-databricks-modern-analytics-architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/azure-databricks-modern-analytics-architecture.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/azure-databricks-modern-analytics-architecture.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @kacummis
* Microsoft Alias: **kacummis**",1.0,"Would like to see implementation for Modern analytics architecture with Azure Databricks - Would like to see implementation for this reference architecture
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7254782d-e773-b542-73e8-f568d3bbee39
* Version Independent ID: 40d81223-f8ea-2eec-616e-5f6ee28c8206
* Content: [Modern analytics architecture with Azure Databricks - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/azure-databricks-modern-analytics-architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/azure-databricks-modern-analytics-architecture.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/azure-databricks-modern-analytics-architecture.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @kacummis
* Microsoft Alias: **kacummis**",1,would like to see implementation for modern analytics architecture with azure databricks would like to see implementation for this reference architecture document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login kacummis microsoft alias kacummis ,1
7661,18781964379.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-08 08:03:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,pre-configured cost profile not working,doc-bug cxp triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
The link you create is not working:
https://azure.com/e/a8c4809dab444c1ca4870c489fbb196b
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e5dbc36d-1197-0b73-d0fe-2c9dd5f1d17d
* Version Independent ID: b2285023-1f19-d037-e1c5-18b0b65009df
* Content: [Scalable and secure WordPress on Azure - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/wordpress)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/wordpress.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/wordpress.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"pre-configured cost profile not working -
[Enter feedback here]
The link you create is not working:
https://azure.com/e/a8c4809dab444c1ca4870c489fbb196b
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e5dbc36d-1197-0b73-d0fe-2c9dd5f1d17d
* Version Independent ID: b2285023-1f19-d037-e1c5-18b0b65009df
* Content: [Scalable and secure WordPress on Azure - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/wordpress)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/wordpress.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/wordpress.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,pre configured cost profile not working the link you create is not working document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
10627,27168372811.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 17:06:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Video capture and analytics for retail,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"I do have interest in solution described as idea here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/video-analytics.
As we start web research for solution components we address that Azure Video Analyzer and Spatial Analysis module are marked as ""Preview"".
Can we expect this module and services to be ordered officially and in what timeframe?
As we have interest in developing our own video analyzing solution are there other integration scenario that we can use in order to integrate with Azure platform.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c3301cd9-73e2-6644-3b79-5be980428dcc
* Version Independent ID: 2f4a1081-5af9-09ad-9892-205e9732df32
* Content: [Video capture and analytics for retail - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/video-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/video-analytics.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/video-analytics.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @niravi-msft
* Microsoft Alias: **niravi**",1.0,"Video capture and analytics for retail - I do have interest in solution described as idea here: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/video-analytics.
As we start web research for solution components we address that Azure Video Analyzer and Spatial Analysis module are marked as ""Preview"".
Can we expect this module and services to be ordered officially and in what timeframe?
As we have interest in developing our own video analyzing solution are there other integration scenario that we can use in order to integrate with Azure platform.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c3301cd9-73e2-6644-3b79-5be980428dcc
* Version Independent ID: 2f4a1081-5af9-09ad-9892-205e9732df32
* Content: [Video capture and analytics for retail - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/video-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/video-analytics.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/video-analytics.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @niravi-msft
* Microsoft Alias: **niravi**",1,video capture and analytics for retail i do have interest in solution described as idea here as we start web research for solution components we address that azure video analyzer and spatial analysis module are marked as preview can we expect this module and services to be ordered officially and in what timeframe as we have interest in developing our own video analyzing solution are there other integration scenario that we can use in order to integrate with azure platform document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login niravi msft microsoft alias niravi ,1
4914,11839013575.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-23 16:30:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Build.js - MODULE_NOT_FOUND,Pri3 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement needs-more-info triaged,"I ran:
```bash
npm install
node .\build\build.js
```
but the outcome is not the expected one:
```
node .\build\build.js
internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:979
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module 'D:\Temp\Arch\build\build.js'
[90m at Function.Module._resolveFilename (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:976:15)[39m
[90m at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:859:27)[39m
[90m at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (internal/modules/run_main.js:71:12)[39m
[90m at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:47[39m {
code: [32m'MODULE_NOT_FOUND'[39m,
requireStack: []
}
```
",1.0,"Build.js - MODULE_NOT_FOUND - I ran:
```bash
npm install
node .\build\build.js
```
but the outcome is not the expected one:
```
node .\build\build.js
internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:979
throw err;
^
Error: Cannot find module 'D:\Temp\Arch\build\build.js'
[90m at Function.Module._resolveFilename (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:976:15)[39m
[90m at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:859:27)[39m
[90m at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (internal/modules/run_main.js:71:12)[39m
[90m at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:47[39m {
code: [32m'MODULE_NOT_FOUND'[39m,
requireStack: []
}
```
",1,build js module not found i ran bash npm install node build build js but the outcome is not the expected one node build build js internal modules cjs loader js throw err error cannot find module d temp arch build build js at function module resolvefilename internal modules cjs loader js at function module load internal modules cjs loader js internal modules run main js at internal main run main module js code module not found requirestack ,1
9254,24304061171.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-29 15:53:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,ADT icon in architecture diagram,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
Super small nit, but the architecture diagram is using an old icon for ADT.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 768f747a-0066-ede4-9373-5fa54ceb80cd
* Version Independent ID: c4d828a3-962e-2a44-7751-f871cd34eea0
* Content: [Facilities management powered by mixed reality and IoT - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/facilities-management-powered-by-mixed-reality-and-iot)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/facilities-management-powered-by-mixed-reality-and-iot.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/facilities-management-powered-by-mixed-reality-and-iot.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"ADT icon in architecture diagram -
Super small nit, but the architecture diagram is using an old icon for ADT.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 768f747a-0066-ede4-9373-5fa54ceb80cd
* Version Independent ID: c4d828a3-962e-2a44-7751-f871cd34eea0
* Content: [Facilities management powered by mixed reality and IoT - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/facilities-management-powered-by-mixed-reality-and-iot)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/facilities-management-powered-by-mixed-reality-and-iot.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/facilities-management-powered-by-mixed-reality-and-iot.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,adt icon in architecture diagram super small nit but the architecture diagram is using an old icon for adt document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9711,25098496315.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 11:58:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Typo?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"In the ""Application Gateway before Firewall"" section, it says:
This design is appropriate for applications that need to know incoming client source IP addresses, for example to serve geolocation-specific content or for logging. Azure Firewall SNATs the incoming traffic, changing the original source IP address.
Then later, after the picture on step 3 it says:
Azure Firewall doesn't SNAT the traffic, because the traffic is going to a private IP address. It forwards the traffic to the application VM if rules allow it. For more information, see [Azure Firewall SNAT](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/firewall/snat-private-range).
Just confused by this and wondering if the first section I put should read ""Web Application Gateway"" SNATs the incoming traffic rather than ""Azure Firewall""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall, App Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Typo? - In the ""Application Gateway before Firewall"" section, it says:
This design is appropriate for applications that need to know incoming client source IP addresses, for example to serve geolocation-specific content or for logging. Azure Firewall SNATs the incoming traffic, changing the original source IP address.
Then later, after the picture on step 3 it says:
Azure Firewall doesn't SNAT the traffic, because the traffic is going to a private IP address. It forwards the traffic to the application VM if rules allow it. For more information, see [Azure Firewall SNAT](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/firewall/snat-private-range).
Just confused by this and wondering if the first section I put should read ""Web Application Gateway"" SNATs the incoming traffic rather than ""Azure Firewall""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall, App Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo in the application gateway before firewall section it says this design is appropriate for applications that need to know incoming client source ip addresses for example to serve geolocation specific content or for logging azure firewall snats the incoming traffic changing the original source ip address then later after the picture on step it says azure firewall doesn t snat the traffic because the traffic is going to a private ip address it forwards the traffic to the application vm if rules allow it for more information see just confused by this and wondering if the first section i put should read web application gateway snats the incoming traffic rather than azure firewall document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login erjosito microsoft alias pnp ,1
5567,12705529449.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-23 04:56:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SignalR - Realtime Web Dashboard,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
It would be great if you can enhance this documentation with implementation details, pricing guidance, code examples, etc.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ec994a02-c71a-8dea-8994-eb8c1e5e2992
* Version Independent ID: 2520c9c8-9d28-dd38-fa05-2c748b20ed8c
* Content: [Real-time Web Dashboard - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-web-dashboard)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-web-dashboard.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-web-dashboard.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"SignalR - Realtime Web Dashboard -
It would be great if you can enhance this documentation with implementation details, pricing guidance, code examples, etc.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ec994a02-c71a-8dea-8994-eb8c1e5e2992
* Version Independent ID: 2520c9c8-9d28-dd38-fa05-2c748b20ed8c
* Content: [Real-time Web Dashboard - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-web-dashboard)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-web-dashboard.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-web-dashboard.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,signalr realtime web dashboard it would be great if you can enhance this documentation with implementation details pricing guidance code examples etc document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5499,12640022043.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-16 01:43:25,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Image text cut off,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
**Low priority:** https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ the image has the text cut off of the last item on the image ""**Microsoft Azure Well Architected Frame**work"" is cut off in the middle of the word ""Framework.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Image text cut off -
**Low priority:** https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ the image has the text cut off of the last item on the image ""**Microsoft Azure Well Architected Frame**work"" is cut off in the middle of the word ""Framework.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,image text cut off low priority the image has the text cut off of the last item on the image microsoft azure well architected frame work is cut off in the middle of the word framework document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
4761,11683895986.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-05 05:02:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Virtual Machines,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Thanks for a great resources. Please Check Virtual Machines section there is Deploy used 2 times.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Virtual Machines - Thanks for a great resources. Please Check Virtual Machines section there is Deploy used 2 times.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,virtual machines thanks for a great resources please check virtual machines section there is deploy used times document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5092,12057198815.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-15 15:29:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Search more than just .NET,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"there is broader support for Azure Search programmability than just .NET
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bc525ce2-d021-8e7a-2a88-10b84a2a37e6
* Version Independent ID: 53450f8d-f877-a903-2101-e4265ef6ec75
* Content: [Choosing a search data store - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Search more than just .NET - there is broader support for Azure Search programmability than just .NET
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bc525ce2-d021-8e7a-2a88-10b84a2a37e6
* Version Independent ID: 53450f8d-f877-a903-2101-e4265ef6ec75
* Content: [Choosing a search data store - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure search more than just net there is broader support for azure search programmability than just net document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
4527,11278504213.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-15 06:58:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio Link is Wrong,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The link to the Visio doc at the top of the page goes to the wrong Ref Arch.
The wrong Visio file is specifically from:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adfs
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e9383c21-9143-1559-c1a8-e6f6dc830159
* Version Independent ID: 37c6c659-a6bc-633e-2b3f-337deb01c215
* Content: [Integrate on-premises AD domains with Azure AD - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Visio Link is Wrong - The link to the Visio doc at the top of the page goes to the wrong Ref Arch.
The wrong Visio file is specifically from:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adfs
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e9383c21-9143-1559-c1a8-e6f6dc830159
* Version Independent ID: 37c6c659-a6bc-633e-2b3f-337deb01c215
* Content: [Integrate on-premises AD domains with Azure AD - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/azure-ad.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio link is wrong the link to the visio doc at the top of the page goes to the wrong ref arch the wrong visio file is specifically from document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
7698,18893522698.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-15 15:32:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,number1,cxp needs-more-info triaged architecture-center/svc azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with Availability Zones - High Availability](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"number1 -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with Availability Zones - High Availability](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
4831,11755046733.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-13 08:41:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Cosmos DB links are too vague,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp docs-experience reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Since Cosmos Db is a multi-model database service, it would be much better if Cosmos Db links are linked to the exact DB type/API/offering. For example key/value storage should be linked to Table API documentation or service. So it would be better if the link is https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/table-introduction.
Since the page is about data stores and what Azure offers; Table API should be mentioned when talking about key/value store and Cosmos DB main link is way to vague. An alternative may be to share both. Same thing is also valid for some other types...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6a2dd11-b2f0-7821-a877-fc09af4ac967
* Version Independent ID: f7537dfd-5472-f0d2-d344-db85fd65bf71
* Content: [Choose the right data store - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Cosmos DB links are too vague - Since Cosmos Db is a multi-model database service, it would be much better if Cosmos Db links are linked to the exact DB type/API/offering. For example key/value storage should be linked to Table API documentation or service. So it would be better if the link is https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/table-introduction.
Since the page is about data stores and what Azure offers; Table API should be mentioned when talking about key/value store and Cosmos DB main link is way to vague. An alternative may be to share both. Same thing is also valid for some other types...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6a2dd11-b2f0-7821-a877-fc09af4ac967
* Version Independent ID: f7537dfd-5472-f0d2-d344-db85fd65bf71
* Content: [Choose the right data store - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,cosmos db links are too vague since cosmos db is a multi model database service it would be much better if cosmos db links are linked to the exact db type api offering for example key value storage should be linked to table api documentation or service so it would be better if the link is since the page is about data stores and what azure offers table api should be mentioned when talking about key value store and cosmos db main link is way to vague an alternative may be to share both same thing is also valid for some other types document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
11341,30118345372.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-30 13:20:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Script will not work if multiple Peerings exist,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Hi,
if you have multiple peerings this script will simply fail - as the remove-part will not handle an string-object.
You need a for-each loop
e.g.:
```
foreach ($ExistingvNetPeering in $hubPeerings)
{
Remove-AzVirtualNetworkPeering -VirtualNetworkName $HubVNetName -ResourceGroupName $HubVNetRGName -name $ExistingvNetPeering.Name -Force
}
```
Also the script does not delete the peering on the other end - so there should be a pause or something else till you delete the other peerings. Otherwise you will run into an error an have to recreate the peering manually (as I did!)
Not the best code quality at all...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Script will not work if multiple Peerings exist - Hi,
if you have multiple peerings this script will simply fail - as the remove-part will not handle an string-object.
You need a for-each loop
e.g.:
```
foreach ($ExistingvNetPeering in $hubPeerings)
{
Remove-AzVirtualNetworkPeering -VirtualNetworkName $HubVNetName -ResourceGroupName $HubVNetRGName -name $ExistingvNetPeering.Name -Force
}
```
Also the script does not delete the peering on the other end - so there should be a pause or something else till you delete the other peerings. Otherwise you will run into an error an have to recreate the peering manually (as I did!)
Not the best code quality at all...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,script will not work if multiple peerings exist hi if you have multiple peerings this script will simply fail as the remove part will not handle an string object you need a for each loop e g foreach existingvnetpeering in hubpeerings remove azvirtualnetworkpeering virtualnetworkname hubvnetname resourcegroupname hubvnetrgname name existingvnetpeering name force also the script does not delete the peering on the other end so there should be a pause or something else till you delete the other peerings otherwise you will run into an error an have to recreate the peering manually as i did not the best code quality at all document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login randycampbell microsoft alias pnp ,1
10127,26361825372.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-11 13:57:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please add whenever IPv6 and Websocket can be used for App Services,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please add whenever IPv6 and Websocket can be used for App Services -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please add whenever and websocket can be used for app services document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11196,28369446020.0,IssuesEvent,2023-04-12 15:54:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Request for Security in the diagram,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"the text mentions Azure AD and Defender for IoT, but these don't show on the diagrams, please add security and monitoring services to the architecture diagram so that we can easily determine how the fit into the big picture
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/iot.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @mcosner
* Microsoft Alias: **mcosner**",2.0,"Request for Security in the diagram - the text mentions Azure AD and Defender for IoT, but these don't show on the diagrams, please add security and monitoring services to the architecture diagram so that we can easily determine how the fit into the big picture
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/iot.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @mcosner
* Microsoft Alias: **mcosner**",1,request for security in the diagram the text mentions azure ad and defender for iot but these don t show on the diagrams please add security and monitoring services to the architecture diagram so that we can easily determine how the fit into the big picture document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mcosner microsoft alias mcosner ,1
11195,28369403856.0,IssuesEvent,2023-04-12 15:52:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Support of automating the Continuous delivery configuration via the ARM Template.,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"Hi,
We are building the VM and installing the software using the ARM template as a Managed Application Solution. Now to support the upgrade of the software's installed we need to enable the Continuous delivery configuration option inside the VM.
We need this to get auto configured when the VM is getting created via the ARM Template.
How can this be supported.
**Edited: Added doc metadata**
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1d688c8c-61d4-8fea-be5c-a97dd9159b5b
* Version Independent ID: 8a70a875-fd18-2600-6b86-a9fbd7e2960a
* Content: [CI/CD for Azure VMs - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-in/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/cicd-for-azure-vms)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/cicd-for-azure-vms.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/cicd-for-azure-vms.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Support of automating the Continuous delivery configuration via the ARM Template. - Hi,
We are building the VM and installing the software using the ARM template as a Managed Application Solution. Now to support the upgrade of the software's installed we need to enable the Continuous delivery configuration option inside the VM.
We need this to get auto configured when the VM is getting created via the ARM Template.
How can this be supported.
**Edited: Added doc metadata**
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1d688c8c-61d4-8fea-be5c-a97dd9159b5b
* Version Independent ID: 8a70a875-fd18-2600-6b86-a9fbd7e2960a
* Content: [CI/CD for Azure VMs - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-in/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/cicd-for-azure-vms)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/cicd-for-azure-vms.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/cicd-for-azure-vms.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,support of automating the continuous delivery configuration via the arm template hi we are building the vm and installing the software using the arm template as a managed application solution now to support the upgrade of the software s installed we need to enable the continuous delivery configuration option inside the vm we need this to get auto configured when the vm is getting created via the arm template how can this be supported edited added doc metadata document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
5039,11986407645.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-07 19:15:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,PDF links point to web instead of pointing to PDF,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
The pdf create has an error. The links are create to the pages in the web while these links should point to the location on the pdf itself
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 041da9ff-57a4-916d-ae12-8b1e4fe77d44
* Version Independent ID: a56ac57e-3796-559f-261f-76061e0e4810
* Content: [Blockchain Workflow Application - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/blockchain-workflow-application)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/blockchain-workflow-application.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/blockchain-workflow-application.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"PDF links point to web instead of pointing to PDF -
[Enter feedback here]
The pdf create has an error. The links are create to the pages in the web while these links should point to the location on the pdf itself
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 041da9ff-57a4-916d-ae12-8b1e4fe77d44
* Version Independent ID: a56ac57e-3796-559f-261f-76061e0e4810
* Content: [Blockchain Workflow Application - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/blockchain-workflow-application)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/blockchain-workflow-application.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/blockchain-workflow-application.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,pdf links point to web instead of pointing to pdf the pdf create has an error the links are create to the pages in the web while these links should point to the location on the pdf itself document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
7270,17287312378.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-24 01:27:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Correction on Diagram,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The reference diagram at the top has 2 workloads. The top one in the disconnected subscription is workload 2, the private endpoint, bastion, and public ip for that workload is labelled “wkld1” instead of “wkld2”
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-dns-infra
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b2d19d00-c368-c49f-0b21-50004f05f2ef
* Version Independent ID: b0dd7137-6c32-84f5-d604-b6f9bca2768b
* Content: [Design a hybrid Domain Name System solution with Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-dns-infra)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-dns-infra.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/hybrid/hybrid-dns-infra.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Correction on Diagram - The reference diagram at the top has 2 workloads. The top one in the disconnected subscription is workload 2, the private endpoint, bastion, and public ip for that workload is labelled “wkld1” instead of “wkld2”
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-dns-infra
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b2d19d00-c368-c49f-0b21-50004f05f2ef
* Version Independent ID: b0dd7137-6c32-84f5-d604-b6f9bca2768b
* Content: [Design a hybrid Domain Name System solution with Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-dns-infra)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-dns-infra.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/hybrid/hybrid-dns-infra.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,correction on diagram the reference diagram at the top has workloads the top one in the disconnected subscription is workload the private endpoint bastion and public ip for that workload is labelled “ ” instead of “ ” document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9675,25018084132.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:47:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing word(s) in text,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"
The text ""Ensure all critical impact admins in are managed"" misses a word or two
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f8c1cdf3-e7a8-ccea-0f3e-e352124a06b9
* Version Independent ID: c014f157-45f9-6dde-9574-0443540bc1c1
* Content: [Administrative account security - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/design-admins)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/design-admins.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/design-admins.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing word(s) in text -
The text ""Ensure all critical impact admins in are managed"" misses a word or two
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f8c1cdf3-e7a8-ccea-0f3e-e352124a06b9
* Version Independent ID: c014f157-45f9-6dde-9574-0443540bc1c1
* Content: [Administrative account security - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/design-admins)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/design-admins.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/design-admins.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing word s in text the text ensure all critical impact admins in are managed misses a word or two document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id ccea version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9720,25104651812.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:49:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incorrect guidance,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Hi team
There is a note in this doc which states the following:
Availability Zones support high availability but are not an effective disaster recovery (DR) strategy. The distance between zones is too close. Typical DR regions should be at least 100 miles away from the primary region.
There are 2 issues with this:
1. It is impossible for our customers to know how many miles away our datacenters are from each other
2. We actually offer a inter-zone disaster recovery service for this use case. Please see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/site-recovery/azure-to-azure-how-to-enable-zone-to-zone-disaster-recovery#using-availability-zones-for-disaster-recovery
Can we please remove or update this note? Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 009774ee-d1e4-1d7b-e53f-ecbcc4d56e5d
* Version Independent ID: d14a99bb-b4d5-21ce-dd72-5759a8284c42
* Content: [SAP S/4HANA in Linux on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/sap-s4hana?source=docs#deploy-virtual-machines-across-availability-zones)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/sap-s4hana.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/sap-s4hana.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @lbrader
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Incorrect guidance - Hi team
There is a note in this doc which states the following:
Availability Zones support high availability but are not an effective disaster recovery (DR) strategy. The distance between zones is too close. Typical DR regions should be at least 100 miles away from the primary region.
There are 2 issues with this:
1. It is impossible for our customers to know how many miles away our datacenters are from each other
2. We actually offer a inter-zone disaster recovery service for this use case. Please see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/site-recovery/azure-to-azure-how-to-enable-zone-to-zone-disaster-recovery#using-availability-zones-for-disaster-recovery
Can we please remove or update this note? Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 009774ee-d1e4-1d7b-e53f-ecbcc4d56e5d
* Version Independent ID: d14a99bb-b4d5-21ce-dd72-5759a8284c42
* Content: [SAP S/4HANA in Linux on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/sap-s4hana?source=docs#deploy-virtual-machines-across-availability-zones)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/sap-s4hana.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/sap-s4hana.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @lbrader
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,incorrect guidance hi team there is a note in this doc which states the following availability zones support high availability but are not an effective disaster recovery dr strategy the distance between zones is too close typical dr regions should be at least miles away from the primary region there are issues with this it is impossible for our customers to know how many miles away our datacenters are from each other we actually offer a inter zone disaster recovery service for this use case please see can we please remove or update this note thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login lbrader microsoft alias pnp ,1
9774,25183681592.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-11 15:52:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Security - Microsoft Defenders - update icons name,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"Hi,
Can you update below icons according to new naming convention?
```
Security
├── 02247-icon-service-Azure-Defender.svg --> Microsoft Defender
└── 10241-icon-service-Security-Center.svg --> Microsoft Defender for Cloud
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Security - Microsoft Defenders - update icons name - Hi,
Can you update below icons according to new naming convention?
```
Security
├── 02247-icon-service-Azure-Defender.svg --> Microsoft Defender
└── 10241-icon-service-Security-Center.svg --> Microsoft Defender for Cloud
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,security microsoft defenders update icons name hi can you update below icons according to new naming convention security ├── icon service azure defender svg microsoft defender └── icon service security center svg microsoft defender for cloud document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
3656,9936175689.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-02 18:26:13,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please consider to add about naming conversations for Fire Wall,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Please consider to add the naming conversation for Azure Firewall's Network rule and application rule.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#networking)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please consider to add about naming conversations for Fire Wall - Please consider to add the naming conversation for Azure Firewall's Network rule and application rule.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#networking)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please consider to add about naming conversations for fire wall please consider to add the naming conversation for azure firewall s network rule and application rule document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
4382,11017773202.0,IssuesEvent,2019-12-05 09:11:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Web app vs Web app name,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"There are two separate lines for ""Web app"" and ""Web app name"". To add further confusion, the minimum according to the Portal is 2, which doesn't match either of the values (error: ""The name must be at least 2 characters""). My understanding is that the name given to a web app must be globally unique.
Can someone review those two lines and make sure they are up to date?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1ddc35bf-00d9-67c8-bf6a-ade5ebea07ca
* Version Independent ID: 7324a1e6-7010-c620-145b-3d8027709545
* Content: [Naming rules and restrictions for Azure resources](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/resource-naming#web)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @DerMar
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Web app vs Web app name - There are two separate lines for ""Web app"" and ""Web app name"". To add further confusion, the minimum according to the Portal is 2, which doesn't match either of the values (error: ""The name must be at least 2 characters""). My understanding is that the name given to a web app must be globally unique.
Can someone review those two lines and make sure they are up to date?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1ddc35bf-00d9-67c8-bf6a-ade5ebea07ca
* Version Independent ID: 7324a1e6-7010-c620-145b-3d8027709545
* Content: [Naming rules and restrictions for Azure resources](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/resource-naming#web)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @DerMar
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,web app vs web app name there are two separate lines for web app and web app name to add further confusion the minimum according to the portal is which doesn t match either of the values error the name must be at least characters my understanding is that the name given to a web app must be globally unique can someone review those two lines and make sure they are up to date document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login dermar microsoft alias pnp ,1
10065,26174558957.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-02 07:57:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,distribution in PNG/PPTX,assigned-to-author doc-idea triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"(This is not an Issue, but a request)
Currently, SVG icon sets are distributed, but I would like to see them distributed in png format if possible, or in pptx like AWS.
https://aws.amazon.com/en/architecture/icons/
(Some tools don't support SVG formats..)
I draw a lot of Azure architecture diagrams, so I would be super happy if you could support this!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1.0,"distribution in PNG/PPTX - (This is not an Issue, but a request)
Currently, SVG icon sets are distributed, but I would like to see them distributed in png format if possible, or in pptx like AWS.
https://aws.amazon.com/en/architecture/icons/
(Some tools don't support SVG formats..)
I draw a lot of Azure architecture diagrams, so I would be super happy if you could support this!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1,distribution in png pptx this is not an issue but a request currently svg icon sets are distributed but i would like to see them distributed in png format if possible or in pptx like aws some tools don t support svg formats i draw a lot of azure architecture diagrams so i would be super happy if you could support this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login robbagby microsoft alias robbag ,1
9709,25091452373.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 06:41:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Just tell me step-by-step how to install anaconda on a windows VM,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Just tell me step-by-step how to install anaconda on a windows VM, including how to set up a Windows VM!!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 678f3299-1ff9-8a31-a434-be16f33f90ef
* Version Independent ID: 18de51b9-9bdc-da60-1e2f-383c79b08e54
* Content: [Run a Windows VM on Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",2.0,"Just tell me step-by-step how to install anaconda on a windows VM -
Just tell me step-by-step how to install anaconda on a windows VM, including how to set up a Windows VM!!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 678f3299-1ff9-8a31-a434-be16f33f90ef
* Version Independent ID: 18de51b9-9bdc-da60-1e2f-383c79b08e54
* Content: [Run a Windows VM on Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,just tell me step by step how to install anaconda on a windows vm just tell me step by step how to install anaconda on a windows vm including how to set up a windows vm document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
5246,12260826224.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-06 18:58:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Lighthouse service comparison with AWS service ,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc triaged,"Could please provide the comparison service in AWS for Azure LightHouse.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Lighthouse service comparison with AWS service - Could please provide the comparison service in AWS for Azure LightHouse.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,lighthouse service comparison with aws service could please provide the comparison service in aws for azure lighthouse document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6696,15053194300.0,IssuesEvent,2021-02-03 16:02:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Virtual network peering - broken link,architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
In the ""Virtual network peering"" section link to ""Peering Overview"" is broken(Markdown error).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli&source=docs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @neilpeterson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Virtual network peering - broken link -
In the ""Virtual network peering"" section link to ""Peering Overview"" is broken(Markdown error).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli&source=docs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @neilpeterson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,virtual network peering broken link in the virtual network peering section link to peering overview is broken markdown error document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login neilpeterson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5887,13247871371.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-19 17:58:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Where is the ACI in the diagram?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
I might be missing something, but shouldn't the architecture diagram should mention the rightmost node is an ACI node?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 01f8f943-7688-65e6-26c9-5d682a225306
* Version Independent ID: 18d298ba-be2b-bc4a-abac-5ea5a94fadca
* Content: [Bursting from AKS with ACI - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scale-using-aks-with-aci)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scale-using-aks-with-aci.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scale-using-aks-with-aci.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Where is the ACI in the diagram? -
I might be missing something, but shouldn't the architecture diagram should mention the rightmost node is an ACI node?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 01f8f943-7688-65e6-26c9-5d682a225306
* Version Independent ID: 18d298ba-be2b-bc4a-abac-5ea5a94fadca
* Content: [Bursting from AKS with ACI - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scale-using-aks-with-aci)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scale-using-aks-with-aci.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scale-using-aks-with-aci.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,where is the aci in the diagram i might be missing something but shouldn t the architecture diagram should mention the rightmost node is an aci node document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id abac content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
11343,30123188051.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-30 16:56:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Why is this article listed under AI/ML architectures?,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Why is this article listed under AI/ML architectures?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f7f45c3e-6598-f423-adf1-6a43ed590e2f
* Version Independent ID: f7f45c3e-6598-f423-adf1-6a43ed590e2f
* Content: [Analyze observational patient data by using OHDSI with the OMOP CDM - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/digital-health/patient-data-ohdsi-omop-cdm)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/digital-health/patient-data-ohdsi-omop-cdm.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/digital-health/patient-data-ohdsi-omop-cdm.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @plooploops
* Microsoft Alias: **angee**",1.0,"Why is this article listed under AI/ML architectures? - Why is this article listed under AI/ML architectures?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f7f45c3e-6598-f423-adf1-6a43ed590e2f
* Version Independent ID: f7f45c3e-6598-f423-adf1-6a43ed590e2f
* Content: [Analyze observational patient data by using OHDSI with the OMOP CDM - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/digital-health/patient-data-ohdsi-omop-cdm)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/digital-health/patient-data-ohdsi-omop-cdm.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/digital-health/patient-data-ohdsi-omop-cdm.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @plooploops
* Microsoft Alias: **angee**",1,why is this article listed under ai ml architectures why is this article listed under ai ml architectures document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login plooploops microsoft alias angee ,1
10450,26989834500.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-09 18:56:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,What about user integrity,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"I see a lot of the Zero Trust visios in the Microsoft library but I wonder about users and auth?
""verifies the trustworthiness of network packets that flow to applications""
- What about the user login?
With App Proxy and B2B, one could invite the client's guest users to log on to the App Proxy to shield the public front from 8 billion users and 8 billion bots
Why is that (pre-auth) not taken into consideration in modern ZT scetches?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4f623b3a-09d7-d793-b007-85b59727c1df
* Version Independent ID: ec0506cd-cdba-784c-6832-ea59697dd39c
* Content: [Zero-trust network for web applications with Azure Firewall and Application Gateway - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1.0,"What about user integrity - I see a lot of the Zero Trust visios in the Microsoft library but I wonder about users and auth?
""verifies the trustworthiness of network packets that flow to applications""
- What about the user login?
With App Proxy and B2B, one could invite the client's guest users to log on to the App Proxy to shield the public front from 8 billion users and 8 billion bots
Why is that (pre-auth) not taken into consideration in modern ZT scetches?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4f623b3a-09d7-d793-b007-85b59727c1df
* Version Independent ID: ec0506cd-cdba-784c-6832-ea59697dd39c
* Content: [Zero-trust network for web applications with Azure Firewall and Application Gateway - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1,what about user integrity i see a lot of the zero trust visios in the microsoft library but i wonder about users and auth verifies the trustworthiness of network packets that flow to applications what about the user login with app proxy and one could invite the client s guest users to log on to the app proxy to shield the public front from billion users and billion bots why is that pre auth not taken into consideration in modern zt scetches document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id cdba content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login erjosito microsoft alias jomore ,1
10229,26561524319.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-20 16:14:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,https://aka.ms/tryworkbench is not valid,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"The link in below is not valid anymore, when access it, it gives 404
Deploy this scenario
[Deploy to Azure](https://aka.ms/tryworkbench)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9ed7b54c-fe6b-4331-f6d4-1e369ebad0c1
* Version Independent ID: 70f614a9-153c-3a7e-107c-526ba68adad6
* Content: [Supply chain track and trace - Azure Solution Ideas](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"https://aka.ms/tryworkbench is not valid - The link in below is not valid anymore, when access it, it gives 404
Deploy this scenario
[Deploy to Azure](https://aka.ms/tryworkbench)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9ed7b54c-fe6b-4331-f6d4-1e369ebad0c1
* Version Independent ID: 70f614a9-153c-3a7e-107c-526ba68adad6
* Content: [Supply chain track and trace - Azure Solution Ideas](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1, is not valid the link in below is not valid anymore when access it it gives deploy this scenario document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
3778,10115286492.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-30 21:21:25,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Article needs to be updated - information is not up to date,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Please update article to accomodate Azure AD Domain Services. The section: ""Integrate your on-premises domains with Azure AD"" states challenges: ""Identity services are limited to users and groups. There is no ability to authenticate service and computer accounts."" ... this is no longer true as Azure AD Domain Services can authenticate services and computer accounts.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dd6463b2-ccca-e0f5-ed8e-ed239541a5c7
* Version Independent ID: 3f497c55-e522-476c-8e63-37de63ff0603
* Content: [Integrate on-premises Active Directory with Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Article needs to be updated - information is not up to date - Please update article to accomodate Azure AD Domain Services. The section: ""Integrate your on-premises domains with Azure AD"" states challenges: ""Identity services are limited to users and groups. There is no ability to authenticate service and computer accounts."" ... this is no longer true as Azure AD Domain Services can authenticate services and computer accounts.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dd6463b2-ccca-e0f5-ed8e-ed239541a5c7
* Version Independent ID: 3f497c55-e522-476c-8e63-37de63ff0603
* Content: [Integrate on-premises Active Directory with Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,article needs to be updated information is not up to date please update article to accomodate azure ad domain services the section integrate your on premises domains with azure ad states challenges identity services are limited to users and groups there is no ability to authenticate service and computer accounts this is no longer true as azure ad domain services can authenticate services and computer accounts document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id ccca version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5183,12198388967.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-29 22:45:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"RSS Feed Button for Architecture Center ""What's New"" Broken",architecture-center/svc meta/subsvc,"
The RSS feed button for the https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog page gives a 404 response.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in the Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **meta**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"RSS Feed Button for Architecture Center ""What's New"" Broken -
The RSS feed button for the https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog page gives a 404 response.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in the Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **meta**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,rss feed button for architecture center what s new broken the rss feed button for the page gives a response document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service meta github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
3459,9652523790.0,IssuesEvent,2019-05-18 17:55:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Marketplace,architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"Columns are in the wrong order.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#azure-and-aws-for-multicloud-solutions)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Marketplace - Columns are in the wrong order.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#azure-and-aws-for-multicloud-solutions)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,marketplace columns are in the wrong order document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
11347,30212618585.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-05 13:43:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Zero-Trust hub and spoke not possible with App Gateway V2,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Hello,
It appears the hub and spoke architecture using a firewall and an application gateway does not support V2. V2 app gateway limitations https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/configuration-infrastructure#supported-user-defined-routes specifically call out the desired UDR in the hub and spoke design.
> Application Gateway intercepts the client packets and examines them. If the packets pass inspection, the Application Gateway would send the packet to the backend VM. When the packet hits Azure, a user-defined route (UDR) in the Application Gateway subnet forwards the packets to Azure Firewall Premium.
What is the recommended approach for the zero trust design?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4f623b3a-09d7-d793-b007-85b59727c1df
* Version Independent ID: ec0506cd-cdba-784c-6832-ea59697dd39c
* Content: [Zero-trust network for web applications with Azure Firewall and Application Gateway - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1.0,"Zero-Trust hub and spoke not possible with App Gateway V2 -
Hello,
It appears the hub and spoke architecture using a firewall and an application gateway does not support V2. V2 app gateway limitations https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-gateway/configuration-infrastructure#supported-user-defined-routes specifically call out the desired UDR in the hub and spoke design.
> Application Gateway intercepts the client packets and examines them. If the packets pass inspection, the Application Gateway would send the packet to the backend VM. When the packet hits Azure, a user-defined route (UDR) in the Application Gateway subnet forwards the packets to Azure Firewall Premium.
What is the recommended approach for the zero trust design?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4f623b3a-09d7-d793-b007-85b59727c1df
* Version Independent ID: ec0506cd-cdba-784c-6832-ea59697dd39c
* Content: [Zero-trust network for web applications with Azure Firewall and Application Gateway - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1,zero trust hub and spoke not possible with app gateway hello it appears the hub and spoke architecture using a firewall and an application gateway does not support app gateway limitations specifically call out the desired udr in the hub and spoke design application gateway intercepts the client packets and examines them if the packets pass inspection the application gateway would send the packet to the backend vm when the packet hits azure a user defined route udr in the application gateway subnet forwards the packets to azure firewall premium what is the recommended approach for the zero trust design document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id cdba content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login erjosito microsoft alias jomore ,1
3422,9608697020.0,IssuesEvent,2019-05-12 08:58:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,HDInsight left out in documentation,architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"If Databricks is listed here, HDInsight should be represented as well
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d0bdc71b-0a54-4cc4-1b79-f60e274e9a51
* Version Independent ID: 1783570c-3545-71c8-72d3-d5657f77c070
* Content: [Choosing a machine learning technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning?toc=%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Fmachine-learning%2Ftoc.json&bc=%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Fbread%2Ftoc.json)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"HDInsight left out in documentation - If Databricks is listed here, HDInsight should be represented as well
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d0bdc71b-0a54-4cc4-1b79-f60e274e9a51
* Version Independent ID: 1783570c-3545-71c8-72d3-d5657f77c070
* Content: [Choosing a machine learning technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning?toc=%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Fmachine-learning%2Ftoc.json&bc=%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Fbread%2Ftoc.json)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,hdinsight left out in documentation if databricks is listed here hdinsight should be represented as well document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5498,12639485862.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-16 00:02:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add Email Campaigns and Click Stream Data Collection Solutions,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-feedback solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
Add Email Campaigns and Click Stream Data Collection Solutions
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 83d7b1d5-7e3e-221f-bd7e-b576364784f8
* Version Independent ID: c08a3f61-caee-ec20-c9ba-cd1a62ab5662
* Content: [Digital Campaign Management - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-using-azure-database-for-postgresql#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-using-azure-database-for-postgresql.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-using-azure-database-for-postgresql.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Add Email Campaigns and Click Stream Data Collection Solutions -
Add Email Campaigns and Click Stream Data Collection Solutions
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 83d7b1d5-7e3e-221f-bd7e-b576364784f8
* Version Independent ID: c08a3f61-caee-ec20-c9ba-cd1a62ab5662
* Content: [Digital Campaign Management - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-using-azure-database-for-postgresql#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-using-azure-database-for-postgresql.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-marketing-using-azure-database-for-postgresql.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,add email campaigns and click stream data collection solutions add email campaigns and click stream data collection solutions document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id caee content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9762,25166119161.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 21:01:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"HTTP 202, wrong description",needs-art doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"There seems a small bug in the description of the sequence diagram
`For every successful call to the status endpoint, it returns HTTP 202.`
Should be
`For every successful call to the status endpoint, it returns HTTP 200.`
The mention of HTTP 202, continues in other text blocks as well.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @WillEastbury
* Microsoft Alias: **wieastbu**",1.0,"HTTP 202, wrong description - There seems a small bug in the description of the sequence diagram
`For every successful call to the status endpoint, it returns HTTP 202.`
Should be
`For every successful call to the status endpoint, it returns HTTP 200.`
The mention of HTTP 202, continues in other text blocks as well.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @WillEastbury
* Microsoft Alias: **wieastbu**",1,http wrong description there seems a small bug in the description of the sequence diagram for every successful call to the status endpoint it returns http should be for every successful call to the status endpoint it returns http the mention of http continues in other text blocks as well document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login willeastbury microsoft alias wieastbu ,1
9391,24491813812.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-10 03:25:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Spelling mistake in Title,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"Hi - The title of the Page is shown as ""Queue-Based Load Leveling pattern"".
I believe the correct spelling for ""Leveling"" is ""Levelling"". Looks like one ""L"" is missing.
Thanks!
-Mathew James
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e0b2b229-0cae-3ba9-180c-5aab1a5a4897
* Version Independent ID: 85c2c9d6-cef4-9a7c-a512-ecdd69e1b456
* Content: [Queue-Based Load Leveling pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Spelling mistake in Title - Hi - The title of the Page is shown as ""Queue-Based Load Leveling pattern"".
I believe the correct spelling for ""Leveling"" is ""Levelling"". Looks like one ""L"" is missing.
Thanks!
-Mathew James
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e0b2b229-0cae-3ba9-180c-5aab1a5a4897
* Version Independent ID: 85c2c9d6-cef4-9a7c-a512-ecdd69e1b456
* Content: [Queue-Based Load Leveling pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,spelling mistake in title hi the title of the page is shown as queue based load leveling pattern i believe the correct spelling for leveling is levelling looks like one l is missing thanks mathew james document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
7271,17287329118.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-24 01:32:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"
I noticed that the comparison chart doesn't have SNS on it. Seems like an odd omission
I think the older version of this doc did have SNS. It's similar to Azure Notification Hubs:
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing -
I noticed that the comparison chart doesn't have SNS on it. Seems like an odd omission
I think the older version of this doc did have SNS. It's similar to Azure Notification Hubs:
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing i noticed that the comparison chart doesn t have sns on it seems like an odd omission i think the older version of this doc did have sns it s similar to azure notification hubs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4657,11504548321.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-12 23:36:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Microsoft.Graph library retry guidance,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc product-question triaged,"Is retry logic built into Microsoft.Graph library, couldn't find any information on this.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Microsoft.Graph library retry guidance - Is retry logic built into Microsoft.Graph library, couldn't find any information on this.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,microsoft graph library retry guidance is retry logic built into microsoft graph library couldn t find any information on this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10612,27145933731.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-16 19:58:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken link for Performance efficiency,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Under the header of `Availability` the link for performance efficiency is listed as a broken link.
```md
### Availability
- Consider leveraging the [typical design patterns for availability](../../framework/resiliency/reliability-patterns.md) when building your cloud application. azure/architecture/framework/scalability/performance-efficiency
- Review the availability considerations in the appropriate [App Service web application reference architecture][app-service-reference-architecture]
- For additional considerations concerning availability, see the [availability checklist][availability] in the Azure Architecture Center.
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 04d3a8e6-d525-cd5e-46b1-d28384fab8bc
* Version Independent ID: 442da3db-2ec4-9f0e-b485-459717c081d2
* Content: [E-commerce front end - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/ecommerce-scenario)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/ecommerce-scenario.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/ecommerce-scenario.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @chrismason
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Broken link for Performance efficiency - Under the header of `Availability` the link for performance efficiency is listed as a broken link.
```md
### Availability
- Consider leveraging the [typical design patterns for availability](../../framework/resiliency/reliability-patterns.md) when building your cloud application. azure/architecture/framework/scalability/performance-efficiency
- Review the availability considerations in the appropriate [App Service web application reference architecture][app-service-reference-architecture]
- For additional considerations concerning availability, see the [availability checklist][availability] in the Azure Architecture Center.
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 04d3a8e6-d525-cd5e-46b1-d28384fab8bc
* Version Independent ID: 442da3db-2ec4-9f0e-b485-459717c081d2
* Content: [E-commerce front end - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/ecommerce-scenario)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/ecommerce-scenario.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/ecommerce-scenario.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @chrismason
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,broken link for performance efficiency under the header of availability the link for performance efficiency is listed as a broken link md availability consider leveraging the framework resiliency reliability patterns md when building your cloud application azure architecture framework scalability performance efficiency review the availability considerations in the appropriate for additional considerations concerning availability see the in the azure architecture center document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login chrismason microsoft alias pnp ,1
7100,16523612723.0,IssuesEvent,2021-05-26 17:08:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Excalidraw Library for Cloud Design Patterns,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author design-pattern/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Just to let you known that I created an [Excalidraw library](https://libraries.excalidraw.com/?sort=default#michelcaradec-cloud-design-patterns) inspired by these pages: .
Excellent documentation by the way!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771
* Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5
* Content: [Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Excalidraw Library for Cloud Design Patterns - Just to let you known that I created an [Excalidraw library](https://libraries.excalidraw.com/?sort=default#michelcaradec-cloud-design-patterns) inspired by these pages: .
Excellent documentation by the way!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771
* Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5
* Content: [Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,excalidraw library for cloud design patterns just to let you known that i created an inspired by these pages excellent documentation by the way document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5590,12746926731.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-26 16:52:25,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How about Azure Data Explorer in this echo system,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"How about Azure Data Explorer in this echo system. When to choose between Azure Synapse vs Azure Data Explorer.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"How about Azure Data Explorer in this echo system - How about Azure Data Explorer in this echo system. When to choose between Azure Synapse vs Azure Data Explorer.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,how about azure data explorer in this echo system how about azure data explorer in this echo system when to choose between azure synapse vs azure data explorer document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
6652,14985306460.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-28 19:47:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing icons,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-feedback triaged,"Hi!
Great that you make the icons available. However, I miss a few icons under Analytics such as Azure Data Factory and Azure Data Lake Storage gen 2. Will this be added to the zip?
Complete list of services:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/#analytics
Thanks and Best Regards
Terje Vatle
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing icons - Hi!
Great that you make the icons available. However, I miss a few icons under Analytics such as Azure Data Factory and Azure Data Lake Storage gen 2. Will this be added to the zip?
Complete list of services:
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/#analytics
Thanks and Best Regards
Terje Vatle
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing icons hi great that you make the icons available however i miss a few icons under analytics such as azure data factory and azure data lake storage gen will this be added to the zip complete list of services thanks and best regards terje vatle document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4547,11311847739.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-20 04:00:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Comparison of availability terms,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"Please add comparison of AWS and Azure availability terms (region, AZ, availability set, etc)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Comparison of availability terms - Please add comparison of AWS and Azure availability terms (region, AZ, availability set, etc)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,comparison of availability terms please add comparison of aws and azure availability terms region az availability set etc document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
5008,11943287451.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 22:52:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio Diagrams,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Please can you share the visio files for these diagrams. thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 31e15f1b-74fe-f944-2cef-2202c7771e72
* Version Independent ID: 4dfbb446-d568-ff0e-be2b-ea0484f33fb5
* Content: [Data Streaming scenario - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/data-streaming-scenario#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/data-streaming-scenario.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/data-streaming-scenario.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Visio Diagrams -
[Enter feedback here]
Please can you share the visio files for these diagrams. thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 31e15f1b-74fe-f944-2cef-2202c7771e72
* Version Independent ID: 4dfbb446-d568-ff0e-be2b-ea0484f33fb5
* Content: [Data Streaming scenario - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/data-streaming-scenario#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/data-streaming-scenario.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/data-streaming-scenario.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio diagrams please can you share the visio files for these diagrams thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10910,27456029798.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-02 21:25:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Virtual Network DNS,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
I would recommend adding a section around editing | updating the vnet custom DNS settings.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Virtual Network DNS -
I would recommend adding a section around editing | updating the vnet custom DNS settings.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,virtual network dns i would recommend adding a section around editing updating the vnet custom dns settings document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9607,24893097883.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-28 13:41:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Services Bus icon is incorrect,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"
Services Bus icon is incorrect
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Services Bus icon is incorrect -
Services Bus icon is incorrect
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,services bus icon is incorrect services bus icon is incorrect document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
7895,19898265752.0,IssuesEvent,2022-01-25 03:17:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Think you mean, Premium, not Production",doc-bug cxp triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"In the following sentence, think your referring to Development or 'Premium' API Management tiers:
The private, internal deployment model allows API Management to connect to an existing virtual network, making it reachable from the inside of that network context. To enable this feature, deploy either the Development or Production API Management tiers.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **fabriciosanchez**",2.0,"Think you mean, Premium, not Production - In the following sentence, think your referring to Development or 'Premium' API Management tiers:
The private, internal deployment model allows API Management to connect to an existing virtual network, making it reachable from the inside of that network context. To enable this feature, deploy either the Development or Production API Management tiers.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **fabriciosanchez**",1,think you mean premium not production in the following sentence think your referring to development or premium api management tiers the private internal deployment model allows api management to connect to an existing virtual network making it reachable from the inside of that network context to enable this feature deploy either the development or production api management tiers document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fada content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login fabriciosanchez microsoft alias fabriciosanchez ,1
9770,25166929730.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 21:48:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Proposed graphic and text updates Dev/Test for SAP,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Hi!
Arnt de Gier here, TME for Azure NetApp Files with NetApp.
I have the following suggestions for updating this article:
In the architecture diagram, add a Azure NetApp Files icon to designate that Azure NetApp Files is a viable and valid storage option for the Spoke virtual machine. See the attached example file for a proposed placement of the ANF icon. Please either implement this change or send me or share with me the original graphic and I can insert the ANF icon for you and return the graphic. My email is **b-arntdegier@microsoft.com**.
In the same article, in the Components section, add this text:
**Storage. Azure Premium Managed disks or Azure NetApp Files provide the recommended storage for the SAP executables and the SAP HANA data and logs.**
In the same article, under considerations, add this text:
**Azure NetApp Files adds further benefits for test/dev environments by using the cloning feature, which allows developers to take near instant clones of production and test databases, which they can access independently from the production databases. Azure NetApp Files cloning is based on the snapshot feature, which produces copies of volumes nearly instantly by only copying the pointers to the data files, not the files themselves.**
In above text, hyperlink the words 'cloning' and 'snapshots' to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-introduction
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8307bb37-3a4f-0073-c495-b2aaa4cc8797
* Version Independent ID: 60702144-7610-fda2-a68d-f9f05aff2921
* Content: [SAP workload development and test settings - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @AndrewDibbins
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp*
*",1.0,"Proposed graphic and text updates Dev/Test for SAP - Hi!
Arnt de Gier here, TME for Azure NetApp Files with NetApp.
I have the following suggestions for updating this article:
In the architecture diagram, add a Azure NetApp Files icon to designate that Azure NetApp Files is a viable and valid storage option for the Spoke virtual machine. See the attached example file for a proposed placement of the ANF icon. Please either implement this change or send me or share with me the original graphic and I can insert the ANF icon for you and return the graphic. My email is **b-arntdegier@microsoft.com**.
In the same article, in the Components section, add this text:
**Storage. Azure Premium Managed disks or Azure NetApp Files provide the recommended storage for the SAP executables and the SAP HANA data and logs.**
In the same article, under considerations, add this text:
**Azure NetApp Files adds further benefits for test/dev environments by using the cloning feature, which allows developers to take near instant clones of production and test databases, which they can access independently from the production databases. Azure NetApp Files cloning is based on the snapshot feature, which produces copies of volumes nearly instantly by only copying the pointers to the data files, not the files themselves.**
In above text, hyperlink the words 'cloning' and 'snapshots' to https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-netapp-files/snapshots-introduction
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8307bb37-3a4f-0073-c495-b2aaa4cc8797
* Version Independent ID: 60702144-7610-fda2-a68d-f9f05aff2921
* Content: [SAP workload development and test settings - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @AndrewDibbins
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp*
*",1,proposed graphic and text updates dev test for sap hi arnt de gier here tme for azure netapp files with netapp i have the following suggestions for updating this article in the architecture diagram add a azure netapp files icon to designate that azure netapp files is a viable and valid storage option for the spoke virtual machine see the attached example file for a proposed placement of the anf icon please either implement this change or send me or share with me the original graphic and i can insert the anf icon for you and return the graphic my email is b arntdegier microsoft com in the same article in the components section add this text storage azure premium managed disks or azure netapp files provide the recommended storage for the sap executables and the sap hana data and logs in the same article under considerations add this text azure netapp files adds further benefits for test dev environments by using the cloning feature which allows developers to take near instant clones of production and test databases which they can access independently from the production databases azure netapp files cloning is based on the snapshot feature which produces copies of volumes nearly instantly by only copying the pointers to the data files not the files themselves in above text hyperlink the words cloning and snapshots to document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login andrewdibbins microsoft alias pnp ,1
10463,26992789623.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-09 21:25:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Copywrite question,in-progress assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hello,
I need to clarify the icon copywrite please. As authors, and course creators, can we use these icons in Microsoft Azure courses, books, slides, and presentation diagrams?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Copywrite question -
[Enter feedback here]
Hello,
I need to clarify the icon copywrite please. As authors, and course creators, can we use these icons in Microsoft Azure courses, books, slides, and presentation diagrams?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,copywrite question hello i need to clarify the icon copywrite please as authors and course creators can we use these icons in microsoft azure courses books slides and presentation diagrams thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11489,30746989073.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-28 15:46:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Subscription logic ,doc-enhancement triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Hi,
Would like the documentation to reflect is how we peer the spoke vnets to the hub when they are located in different subscriptions.
Both in code and on the visio drawing.
We are trying to relate this to our environment, where we have 1 subscription where the hub is located, and the spokes consist of subscription and all the resources. eg: vnet, vms.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Subscription logic -
Hi,
Would like the documentation to reflect is how we peer the spoke vnets to the hub when they are located in different subscriptions.
Both in code and on the visio drawing.
We are trying to relate this to our environment, where we have 1 subscription where the hub is located, and the spokes consist of subscription and all the resources. eg: vnet, vms.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,subscription logic hi would like the documentation to reflect is how we peer the spoke vnets to the hub when they are located in different subscriptions both in code and on the visio drawing we are trying to relate this to our environment where we have subscription where the hub is located and the spokes consist of subscription and all the resources eg vnet vms document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
3661,9958399129.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-05 20:56:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,System State Backup,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"I would mention in the Manageability Section that it is recommended to use Azure MARS Backups installed within each Domain Controller to back up System State.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Extend your on-premises Active Directory domain to Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"System State Backup - I would mention in the Manageability Section that it is recommended to use Azure MARS Backups installed within each Domain Controller to back up System State.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Extend your on-premises Active Directory domain to Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,system state backup i would mention in the manageability section that it is recommended to use azure mars backups installed within each domain controller to back up system state document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
11225,28496730180.0,IssuesEvent,2023-04-18 14:42:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Number sceme numbering does not align with the numbering in the spreadsheet,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
The number scheme numbering does not align with the numbering in the ""Microsoft Conditional Access for Zero trust persona based policies"" spreadsheet linked on the page under Recommended Conditional Access policies. This is easy to solve, but this is probably one of the best documentation documents I have seen so why shame it with this flaw? Thank you very much
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Version Independent ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Content: [Conditional Access framework and policies - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/security/conditional-access-framework)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @clajes
* Microsoft Alias: **clajes**",1.0,"Number sceme numbering does not align with the numbering in the spreadsheet -
The number scheme numbering does not align with the numbering in the ""Microsoft Conditional Access for Zero trust persona based policies"" spreadsheet linked on the page under Recommended Conditional Access policies. This is easy to solve, but this is probably one of the best documentation documents I have seen so why shame it with this flaw? Thank you very much
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Version Independent ID: a7fac997-1920-f24e-767a-13755b794f85
* Content: [Conditional Access framework and policies - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/security/conditional-access-framework)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/security/conditional-access-framework.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @clajes
* Microsoft Alias: **clajes**",1,number sceme numbering does not align with the numbering in the spreadsheet the number scheme numbering does not align with the numbering in the microsoft conditional access for zero trust persona based policies spreadsheet linked on the page under recommended conditional access policies this is easy to solve but this is probably one of the best documentation documents i have seen so why shame it with this flaw thank you very much document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login clajes microsoft alias clajes ,1
5432,12497866144.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:14:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Is Databricks query logs available in diagnostic setting?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Hi,
We have enabled diagnostic setting for our Azure Databricks workspace and the logs are exported to Log Analytics Workspace. However when we go to Log Analytics workspace, we are not able to see logs of queries run in Databricks. Would you please suggest how we can get this information?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Is Databricks query logs available in diagnostic setting? - Hi,
We have enabled diagnostic setting for our Azure Databricks workspace and the logs are exported to Log Analytics Workspace. However when we go to Log Analytics workspace, we are not able to see logs of queries run in Databricks. Would you please suggest how we can get this information?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,is databricks query logs available in diagnostic setting hi we have enabled diagnostic setting for our azure databricks workspace and the logs are exported to log analytics workspace however when we go to log analytics workspace we are not able to see logs of queries run in databricks would you please suggest how we can get this information thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9115,24053406768.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 14:40:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Teams exclusions - .txt files ??,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Please provide the https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions in the format of https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/fslogix/manage-profile-content-cncpt#structure-of-redirectionsxml-file
Saying .txt files is very vague!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Teams exclusions - .txt files ?? -
Please provide the https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions in the format of https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/fslogix/manage-profile-content-cncpt#structure-of-redirectionsxml-file
Saying .txt files is very vague!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,teams exclusions txt files please provide the in the format of saying txt files is very vague document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afaf content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login christiaanbrinkhoff microsoft alias pnp ,1
5093,12057410926.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-15 15:48:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,EventHubs with Kafka support,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"now that EventHubs supports Kafka endpoints this document should be updated to reflect the protocols that EventHubs supports to include Kafka
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dc25fa01-4939-49b8-2e56-fb2cd8f0ccb1
* Version Independent ID: c4815a00-938c-7f7b-67a5-c16a78871b4a
* Content: [Choosing a real-time message ingestion technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/real-time-ingestion#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/real-time-ingestion.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/real-time-ingestion.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"EventHubs with Kafka support - now that EventHubs supports Kafka endpoints this document should be updated to reflect the protocols that EventHubs supports to include Kafka
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dc25fa01-4939-49b8-2e56-fb2cd8f0ccb1
* Version Independent ID: c4815a00-938c-7f7b-67a5-c16a78871b4a
* Content: [Choosing a real-time message ingestion technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/real-time-ingestion#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/real-time-ingestion.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/real-time-ingestion.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,eventhubs with kafka support now that eventhubs supports kafka endpoints this document should be updated to reflect the protocols that eventhubs supports to include kafka document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
10621,27166923292.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 16:02:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"This page is almost the same as Virtual Machines and reliability, not sure why we need 2 page",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
This page https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/operational-excellence?branch=pr-en-us-3747 is almost the same as the Virtual Machines and reliability page
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/reliability?branch=pr-en-us-3747
Not sure whether it's beneficial for the customers to see this twice.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 886a57e5-bb32-3a15-50e1-35508829aecd
* Version Independent ID: 886a57e5-bb32-3a15-50e1-35508829aecd
* Content: [Virtual Machines and operational excellence - Azure Architecture Center](https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/operational-excellence?branch=pr-en-us-3747)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/operational-excellence.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/operational-excellence.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-stacywray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"This page is almost the same as Virtual Machines and reliability, not sure why we need 2 page -
[Enter feedback here]
This page https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/operational-excellence?branch=pr-en-us-3747 is almost the same as the Virtual Machines and reliability page
https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/reliability?branch=pr-en-us-3747
Not sure whether it's beneficial for the customers to see this twice.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 886a57e5-bb32-3a15-50e1-35508829aecd
* Version Independent ID: 886a57e5-bb32-3a15-50e1-35508829aecd
* Content: [Virtual Machines and operational excellence - Azure Architecture Center](https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/operational-excellence?branch=pr-en-us-3747)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/operational-excellence.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/services/compute/virtual-machines/operational-excellence.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-stacywray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,this page is almost the same as virtual machines and reliability not sure why we need page this page is almost the same as the virtual machines and reliability page not sure whether it s beneficial for the customers to see this twice document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login v stacywray microsoft alias pnp ,1
8435,22494146551.0,IssuesEvent,2022-06-23 05:42:12,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Explanation for Azure Container Apps,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"The explanation for understanding Azure Container Apps is same as Azure Virtual Machine.
```
Deploy and manage VMs inside an Azure virtual network.
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#understand-the-basic-features)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Explanation for Azure Container Apps - The explanation for understanding Azure Container Apps is same as Azure Virtual Machine.
```
Deploy and manage VMs inside an Azure virtual network.
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#understand-the-basic-features)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,explanation for azure container apps the explanation for understanding azure container apps is same as azure virtual machine deploy and manage vms inside an azure virtual network document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
7426,17782945450.0,IssuesEvent,2021-08-31 07:40:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can you expand on data flow item 8?,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
I would like to know with more details how/if can Databricks output data to a CosmosDB that uses mongo API. Its the item number 8 on the architecture
Thank in advance.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can you expand on data flow item 8? -
I would like to know with more details how/if can Databricks output data to a CosmosDB that uses mongo API. Its the item number 8 on the architecture
Thank in advance.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can you expand on data flow item i would like to know with more details how if can databricks output data to a cosmosdb that uses mongo api its the item number on the architecture thank in advance document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5557,12700981749.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 17:17:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Retry Exponential from Azure function app (node js),Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-bug triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hello,
There is any way to use retry exponential for messages receiving in function app (Service Bus Trigger) from the function without using microsoft sdk (bindings / internal settings) ?
Thanks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Retry Exponential from Azure function app (node js) -
[Enter feedback here]
Hello,
There is any way to use retry exponential for messages receiving in function app (Service Bus Trigger) from the function without using microsoft sdk (bindings / internal settings) ?
Thanks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,retry exponential from azure function app node js hello there is any way to use retry exponential for messages receiving in function app service bus trigger from the function without using microsoft sdk bindings internal settings thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4449,11146129811.0,IssuesEvent,2019-12-23 08:52:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Does each new service have its own database? ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"I think this article and its pictures could clarify whether or not each new service gets its own database, and syncs its data back to the monolith. Or perhaps if the new service starts pointing at the monolith's database and eventually migrates to its own?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab3d720e-441b-16f6-a73d-d7a66f81fa32
* Version Independent ID: 8a923182-0020-db36-e896-0cf71d277c67
* Content: [Monoliths to microservices using domain-driven design - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/migrate-monolith#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/migrate-monolith.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/migrate-monolith.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @lavann
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Does each new service have its own database? - I think this article and its pictures could clarify whether or not each new service gets its own database, and syncs its data back to the monolith. Or perhaps if the new service starts pointing at the monolith's database and eventually migrates to its own?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab3d720e-441b-16f6-a73d-d7a66f81fa32
* Version Independent ID: 8a923182-0020-db36-e896-0cf71d277c67
* Content: [Monoliths to microservices using domain-driven design - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/migrate-monolith#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/migrate-monolith.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/migrate-monolith.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @lavann
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,does each new service have its own database i think this article and its pictures could clarify whether or not each new service gets its own database and syncs its data back to the monolith or perhaps if the new service starts pointing at the monolith s database and eventually migrates to its own document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login lavann microsoft alias pnp ,1
11097,28006050492.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-27 15:19:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Gateway in front of APIM - why - what capability that Gateway has that APIM does not?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
What is the purpose of the gateway in front of the APIM? I feel if its there to address a business reason than that should be stated in
why that reason caused the gateway to be in front. Otherwise, I would give this diagram as two alternatives - one with the gateway, the other without and why both may be used for different purposes.
My understanding is that APIM has policies to apply when traffic arrives, while the gateway is perhaps a lower-level requirement in terms of the network topology. As a cloud solution architect, I try to NOT think of my implementations at that level, as like I say, Serverless needs to be about thinking of servers (and low level infrastructure) less, and think of PaaS almost exclusively.
Regards,
Richard
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **fabriciosanchez**",2.0,"Gateway in front of APIM - why - what capability that Gateway has that APIM does not? -
What is the purpose of the gateway in front of the APIM? I feel if its there to address a business reason than that should be stated in
why that reason caused the gateway to be in front. Otherwise, I would give this diagram as two alternatives - one with the gateway, the other without and why both may be used for different purposes.
My understanding is that APIM has policies to apply when traffic arrives, while the gateway is perhaps a lower-level requirement in terms of the network topology. As a cloud solution architect, I try to NOT think of my implementations at that level, as like I say, Serverless needs to be about thinking of servers (and low level infrastructure) less, and think of PaaS almost exclusively.
Regards,
Richard
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **fabriciosanchez**",1,gateway in front of apim why what capability that gateway has that apim does not what is the purpose of the gateway in front of the apim i feel if its there to address a business reason than that should be stated in why that reason caused the gateway to be in front otherwise i would give this diagram as two alternatives one with the gateway the other without and why both may be used for different purposes my understanding is that apim has policies to apply when traffic arrives while the gateway is perhaps a lower level requirement in terms of the network topology as a cloud solution architect i try to not think of my implementations at that level as like i say serverless needs to be about thinking of servers and low level infrastructure less and think of paas almost exclusively regards richard document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fada content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login fabriciosanchez microsoft alias fabriciosanchez ,1
11070,27960787810.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 15:30:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Linked to old Microsoft REST API Guidelines,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 best-practice/subsvc,"The link on this page to the Microsoft REST API Guidelines takes you to the master branch of the repo, which hasn't been updated in 5 years.
Should look into updating the link to point to the vNext branch of the repo: https://github.com/microsoft/api-guidelines/blob/vNext/Guidelines.md
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad651d6a-f8d8-2050-e7a7-adbae7326112
* Version Independent ID: 4fddd724-cabd-8623-7692-857088c1dccb
* Content: [Web API design best practices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Linked to old Microsoft REST API Guidelines - The link on this page to the Microsoft REST API Guidelines takes you to the master branch of the repo, which hasn't been updated in 5 years.
Should look into updating the link to point to the vNext branch of the repo: https://github.com/microsoft/api-guidelines/blob/vNext/Guidelines.md
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad651d6a-f8d8-2050-e7a7-adbae7326112
* Version Independent ID: 4fddd724-cabd-8623-7692-857088c1dccb
* Content: [Web API design best practices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,linked to old microsoft rest api guidelines the link on this page to the microsoft rest api guidelines takes you to the master branch of the repo which hasn t been updated in years should look into updating the link to point to the vnext branch of the repo document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id cabd content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
10623,27167415893.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 16:23:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add Visio download link to architecture diagrams,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Most pages appear to have a link to ""Download Visio file of this architecture"", although several are missing the diagram download link. The ability to customize these diagrams for transformation plans is a game changer.
Many thanks for the excellent work on these guides.
Steps to reproduce
1. First, go to the [Implement a hybrid network](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz) guide page.
2. Look in the space below the Architecture diagram (fig. 1).
3. Next, go to [Long-term security log retention with Azure Data Explorer](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/security-log-retention-azure-data-explorer) guide page.
4. Look in the space below the Architecture diagram (fig 2).
Fig. 1 - Yep
![]()
Fig. 2 - Nope
![]()
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cce1e234-bf77-9f76-ef22-16df2a86b2dc
* Version Independent ID: cce1e234-bf77-9f76-ef22-16df2a86b2dc
* Content: [Long-term security log retention with Azure Data Explorer - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/security-log-retention-azure-data-explorer)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/security/security-log-retention-azure-data-explorer.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/security/security-log-retention-azure-data-explorer.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @DeepakAgrawalMS
* Microsoft Alias: **dagrawal**",1.0,"Add Visio download link to architecture diagrams - Most pages appear to have a link to ""Download Visio file of this architecture"", although several are missing the diagram download link. The ability to customize these diagrams for transformation plans is a game changer.
Many thanks for the excellent work on these guides.
Steps to reproduce
1. First, go to the [Implement a hybrid network](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz) guide page.
2. Look in the space below the Architecture diagram (fig. 1).
3. Next, go to [Long-term security log retention with Azure Data Explorer](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/security-log-retention-azure-data-explorer) guide page.
4. Look in the space below the Architecture diagram (fig 2).
Fig. 1 - Yep
![]()
Fig. 2 - Nope
![]()
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cce1e234-bf77-9f76-ef22-16df2a86b2dc
* Version Independent ID: cce1e234-bf77-9f76-ef22-16df2a86b2dc
* Content: [Long-term security log retention with Azure Data Explorer - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/security-log-retention-azure-data-explorer)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/security/security-log-retention-azure-data-explorer.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/security/security-log-retention-azure-data-explorer.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @DeepakAgrawalMS
* Microsoft Alias: **dagrawal**",1,add visio download link to architecture diagrams most pages appear to have a link to download visio file of this architecture although several are missing the diagram download link the ability to customize these diagrams for transformation plans is a game changer many thanks for the excellent work on these guides steps to reproduce first go to the guide page look in the space below the architecture diagram fig next go to guide page look in the space below the architecture diagram fig fig yep img width alt image src fig nope img width alt image src document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login deepakagrawalms microsoft alias dagrawal ,1
4954,11885383806.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-27 19:30:16,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Software Quality vs Great Azure Architecture Pillars?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"In Microsoft Docs - there are 5 pillars of great software quality. However, in Microsoft Learn (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/learn/modules/pillars-of-a-great-azure-architecture/) - the definition is slightly different, it is 4 pillars of Great Azure Architecture instead.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 111d7b49-94b6-abd9-c21a-fb0bace59114
* Version Independent ID: 5d9aa212-cbb2-803c-2ea9-6da76c7a9394
* Content: [Pillars of software quality - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/pillars#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/pillars.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/pillars.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Software Quality vs Great Azure Architecture Pillars? - In Microsoft Docs - there are 5 pillars of great software quality. However, in Microsoft Learn (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/learn/modules/pillars-of-a-great-azure-architecture/) - the definition is slightly different, it is 4 pillars of Great Azure Architecture instead.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 111d7b49-94b6-abd9-c21a-fb0bace59114
* Version Independent ID: 5d9aa212-cbb2-803c-2ea9-6da76c7a9394
* Content: [Pillars of software quality - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/pillars#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/pillars.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/pillars.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,software quality vs great azure architecture pillars in microsoft docs there are pillars of great software quality however in microsoft learn the definition is slightly different it is pillars of great azure architecture instead document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6634,14972941141.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-27 23:55:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio stencil format ?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"
Hi MS,
Could you please organize your icons into Visio Stencil format ?
As an Architect using Visio, it's easier to import stencil rather than SVG icons.
Thank you :)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/?WT.mc_id=thomasmaurer-blog-thmaure)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Visio stencil format ? -
Hi MS,
Could you please organize your icons into Visio Stencil format ?
As an Architect using Visio, it's easier to import stencil rather than SVG icons.
Thank you :)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/?WT.mc_id=thomasmaurer-blog-thmaure)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio stencil format hi ms could you please organize your icons into visio stencil format as an architect using visio it s easier to import stencil rather than svg icons thank you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11441,30514193143.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-19 00:32:12,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Document understanding,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
The documentation is not very clear. It is not complete, some function definition is not defined and there is not an example of how the dataset is composed.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3026912b-cf94-e0fb-0b83-6f78219b24e0
* Version Independent ID: 3026912b-cf94-e0fb-0b83-6f78219b24e0
* Content: [Query-based document summarization - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/query-based-summarization)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/ai/query-based-summarization.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/ai/query-based-summarization.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @raniabayoumy
* Microsoft Alias: **rabayoum**",1.0,"Document understanding -
[Enter feedback here]
The documentation is not very clear. It is not complete, some function definition is not defined and there is not an example of how the dataset is composed.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3026912b-cf94-e0fb-0b83-6f78219b24e0
* Version Independent ID: 3026912b-cf94-e0fb-0b83-6f78219b24e0
* Content: [Query-based document summarization - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/query-based-summarization)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/ai/query-based-summarization.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/ai/query-based-summarization.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @raniabayoumy
* Microsoft Alias: **rabayoum**",1,document understanding the documentation is not very clear it is not complete some function definition is not defined and there is not an example of how the dataset is composed document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login raniabayoumy microsoft alias rabayoum ,1
9896,25543473393.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-29 16:53:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Confusion between billing zones and availability zones,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
Quote: ""Data transfers across availability zones of a region are not free. If your workload is multi-region or there are transfers across billing zones, then expect additional bandwidth cost. For more information, see [Traffic across billing zones and regions](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/design-regions?branch=master#traffic-across-billing-zones-and-regions).""
The first sentence seems to indicate that the rest of the paragraph applies to *availability* zones but the remaining paragraph and the link reference *billing* zone. These are completely different.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",2.0,"Confusion between billing zones and availability zones -
[Enter feedback here]
Quote: ""Data transfers across availability zones of a region are not free. If your workload is multi-region or there are transfers across billing zones, then expect additional bandwidth cost. For more information, see [Traffic across billing zones and regions](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/design-regions?branch=master#traffic-across-billing-zones-and-regions).""
The first sentence seems to indicate that the rest of the paragraph applies to *availability* zones but the remaining paragraph and the link reference *billing* zone. These are completely different.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",1,confusion between billing zones and availability zones quote data transfers across availability zones of a region are not free if your workload is multi region or there are transfers across billing zones then expect additional bandwidth cost for more information see the first sentence seems to indicate that the rest of the paragraph applies to availability zones but the remaining paragraph and the link reference billing zone these are completely different document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias prwilk ,1
9176,24167503368.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-22 16:10:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,ADAL is being depreciated,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
ADAL is being depreciated and should be removed from this article. See this article for details:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/msal-migration
Cc: @mmacy
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab204a8d-c451-ef99-6610-139a0dee61ac
* Version Independent ID: 23a69ae2-70bc-aab5-bbe1-e9699d57558b
* Content: [Cache access tokens in a multitenant application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/token-cache)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"ADAL is being depreciated -
ADAL is being depreciated and should be removed from this article. See this article for details:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/msal-migration
Cc: @mmacy
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab204a8d-c451-ef99-6610-139a0dee61ac
* Version Independent ID: 23a69ae2-70bc-aab5-bbe1-e9699d57558b
* Content: [Cache access tokens in a multitenant application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/token-cache)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,adal is being depreciated adal is being depreciated and should be removed from this article see this article for details cc mmacy document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5233,12244547198.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-05 11:20:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Next Steps Links Broken,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"The links for ""How to use Azure Blob storage"" and ""How to encode an asset using Media Encoder"" take to a main page instead of specific articles. I didn't try other links but they all need to be verified and fixed if broken as well.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cd6efdd9-5b74-3186-a8f9-ac482f1215f2
* Version Independent ID: e262bd4f-11f1-ab1c-ffb1-61361287464c
* Content: [Video-on-demand digital media - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Next Steps Links Broken - The links for ""How to use Azure Blob storage"" and ""How to encode an asset using Media Encoder"" take to a main page instead of specific articles. I didn't try other links but they all need to be verified and fixed if broken as well.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cd6efdd9-5b74-3186-a8f9-ac482f1215f2
* Version Independent ID: e262bd4f-11f1-ab1c-ffb1-61361287464c
* Content: [Video-on-demand digital media - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-video.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,next steps links broken the links for how to use azure blob storage and how to encode an asset using media encoder take to a main page instead of specific articles i didn t try other links but they all need to be verified and fixed if broken as well document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
3885,10239425536.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:13:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Need to update based on ADLS Gen2 Functionality,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"
Page needs to be updated based on the ADLS Gen2 functionality. It actually offers GRS. Incorrectly stated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4931350d-0c12-00b2-64a8-112f67aba3f2
* Version Independent ID: eed89d06-7676-30e1-b801-2f67a09856f0
* Content: [Choosing a data storage technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Need to update based on ADLS Gen2 Functionality -
Page needs to be updated based on the ADLS Gen2 functionality. It actually offers GRS. Incorrectly stated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4931350d-0c12-00b2-64a8-112f67aba3f2
* Version Independent ID: eed89d06-7676-30e1-b801-2f67a09856f0
* Content: [Choosing a data storage technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-storage.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,need to update based on adls functionality page needs to be updated based on the adls functionality it actually offers grs incorrectly stated document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
7293,17360898509.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-29 20:27:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,typo of content,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug triaged well-architected/subsvc,"[Enter feedback here]
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) — The average time between failures of a particular component.
duplicated sentence in ""Availability targets"" section of the article.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 60422eab-f284-4d0f-a856-3910e017b89b
* Version Independent ID: 05eebcc2-4193-def3-ee98-ae98e9729263
* Content: [Target and non-functional requirements - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/design-requirements)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/design-requirements.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/design-requirements.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-aangie
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"typo of content - [Enter feedback here]
Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) — The average time between failures of a particular component.
duplicated sentence in ""Availability targets"" section of the article.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 60422eab-f284-4d0f-a856-3910e017b89b
* Version Independent ID: 05eebcc2-4193-def3-ee98-ae98e9729263
* Content: [Target and non-functional requirements - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/design-requirements)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/design-requirements.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/design-requirements.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-aangie
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo of content mean time between failures mtbf — the average time between failures of a particular component duplicated sentence in availability targets section of the article document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login v aangie microsoft alias pnp ,1
6259,14017218993.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-29 15:24:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing Azure Equivalent to Macie on AWS,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Document is Missing Azure Equivalent to Macie on AWS
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing Azure Equivalent to Macie on AWS - Document is Missing Azure Equivalent to Macie on AWS
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing azure equivalent to macie on aws document is missing azure equivalent to macie on aws document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5191,12219827054.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-01 22:55:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,This page redirected from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot-with-sql but it talks about reference architecture and not on IoT using SQL as stated in the link,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"for more, contact me at avi@wertheimer.co.il
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/iot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"This page redirected from https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot-with-sql but it talks about reference architecture and not on IoT using SQL as stated in the link - for more, contact me at avi@wertheimer.co.il
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/iot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,this page redirected from but it talks about reference architecture and not on iot using sql as stated in the link for more contact me at avi wertheimer co il document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10714,27316716921.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-24 16:15:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Anthos Service Mesh should be mapped to OSM not Service Fabric Mesh,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"
at [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/gcp-professional/services#containers-and-container-orchestrators](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/gcp-professional/services#containers-and-container-orchestrators)
Anthos Service Mesh should be mapped to [Open Service Mesh](https://openservicemesh.io) (OSM) NOT Service Fabric Mesh
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87304679-95c2-7dac-a2b5-4ce17d6967f3
* Version Independent ID: 8acbb5ee-230c-e23a-a315-0d969258bd8f
* Content: [Google Cloud to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/gcp-professional/services#containers-and-container-orchestrators)
* Content Source: [docs/gcp-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/gcp-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **petuton**[nthos Service Mesh](https://cloud.google.com/service-mesh/docs) [Service Fabric Mesh](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-fabric-mesh/service-fabric-mesh-overview)",1.0,"Anthos Service Mesh should be mapped to OSM not Service Fabric Mesh -
at [https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/gcp-professional/services#containers-and-container-orchestrators](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/gcp-professional/services#containers-and-container-orchestrators)
Anthos Service Mesh should be mapped to [Open Service Mesh](https://openservicemesh.io) (OSM) NOT Service Fabric Mesh
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87304679-95c2-7dac-a2b5-4ce17d6967f3
* Version Independent ID: 8acbb5ee-230c-e23a-a315-0d969258bd8f
* Content: [Google Cloud to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/gcp-professional/services#containers-and-container-orchestrators)
* Content Source: [docs/gcp-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/gcp-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **petuton**[nthos Service Mesh](https://cloud.google.com/service-mesh/docs) [Service Fabric Mesh](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-fabric-mesh/service-fabric-mesh-overview)",1,anthos service mesh should be mapped to osm not service fabric mesh at anthos service mesh should be mapped to osm not service fabric mesh document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login edprice msft microsoft alias petuton ,1
3878,10239353386.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:02:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Key/Value vs Object storage,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"Key/Value and Object storage are extremely similar, potentially the same.
It would be good if the doc could draw out the similarities and differences. They should be discussed together. A person looking for a key/value store, based strictly on this doc, wouldn't consider blob storage, and that's just not right.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6a2dd11-b2f0-7821-a877-fc09af4ac967
* Version Independent ID: f7537dfd-5472-f0d2-d344-db85fd65bf71
* Content: [Choose the right data store - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview#object-storage)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Key/Value vs Object storage - Key/Value and Object storage are extremely similar, potentially the same.
It would be good if the doc could draw out the similarities and differences. They should be discussed together. A person looking for a key/value store, based strictly on this doc, wouldn't consider blob storage, and that's just not right.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6a2dd11-b2f0-7821-a877-fc09af4ac967
* Version Independent ID: f7537dfd-5472-f0d2-d344-db85fd65bf71
* Content: [Choose the right data store - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview#object-storage)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,key value vs object storage key value and object storage are extremely similar potentially the same it would be good if the doc could draw out the similarities and differences they should be discussed together a person looking for a key value store based strictly on this doc wouldn t consider blob storage and that s just not right document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10690,27297349406.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-23 21:37:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Unclear phrasing,cxp assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"""Federated authentication provides a standards-based solution to the issue of trusting identities across diverse domains, and can support single sign-on. _It's becoming more common across all types of applications, especially cloud-hosted applications, because it supports single sign-on without requiring a direct network connection to identity providers._ ""
Italicized sentence is desperately unclear. Who/what doesn't need to directly connect to identity providers?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4943e185-fb94-576a-d0a1-2cfefd0d0f96
* Version Independent ID: a9a5a4b7-887c-c298-f720-49ed6abaa575
* Content: [Federated Identity pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/federated-identity)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/federated-identity.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/federated-identity.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Unclear phrasing - ""Federated authentication provides a standards-based solution to the issue of trusting identities across diverse domains, and can support single sign-on. _It's becoming more common across all types of applications, especially cloud-hosted applications, because it supports single sign-on without requiring a direct network connection to identity providers._ ""
Italicized sentence is desperately unclear. Who/what doesn't need to directly connect to identity providers?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4943e185-fb94-576a-d0a1-2cfefd0d0f96
* Version Independent ID: a9a5a4b7-887c-c298-f720-49ed6abaa575
* Content: [Federated Identity pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/federated-identity)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/federated-identity.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/federated-identity.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,unclear phrasing federated authentication provides a standards based solution to the issue of trusting identities across diverse domains and can support single sign on it s becoming more common across all types of applications especially cloud hosted applications because it supports single sign on without requiring a direct network connection to identity providers italicized sentence is desperately unclear who what doesn t need to directly connect to identity providers document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
7795,19377601614.0,IssuesEvent,2021-12-17 00:57:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Duplicate items,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
One of the duplicate bullet items in the list should be removed:
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Security Recommendations
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Security Recommendations
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dce3b9c5-ef05-1ff3-a6fe-052f48a9b471
* Version Independent ID: f6d3e8e8-37c5-43e6-6185-58f8511dee7e
* Content: [Hybrid security monitoring with Sentinel - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Duplicate items -
One of the duplicate bullet items in the list should be removed:
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Security Recommendations
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Security Recommendations
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dce3b9c5-ef05-1ff3-a6fe-052f48a9b471
* Version Independent ID: f6d3e8e8-37c5-43e6-6185-58f8511dee7e
* Content: [Hybrid security monitoring with Sentinel - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/hybrid/hybrid-security-monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,duplicate items one of the duplicate bullet items in the list should be removed microsoft defender for cloud security recommendations microsoft defender for cloud security recommendations document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
7703,18907370704.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-16 10:29:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Recommend token cache serialization in MSAL.NET article,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
You might be interested in the content (or link to) the following article:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/msal-net-token-cache-serialization
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab204a8d-c451-ef99-6610-139a0dee61ac
* Version Independent ID: 23a69ae2-70bc-aab5-bbe1-e9699d57558b
* Content: [Cache access tokens in a multitenant app - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/token-cache)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Recommend token cache serialization in MSAL.NET article -
[Enter feedback here]
You might be interested in the content (or link to) the following article:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/develop/msal-net-token-cache-serialization
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab204a8d-c451-ef99-6610-139a0dee61ac
* Version Independent ID: 23a69ae2-70bc-aab5-bbe1-e9699d57558b
* Content: [Cache access tokens in a multitenant app - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/token-cache)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,recommend token cache serialization in msal net article you might be interested in the content or link to the following article document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
7282,17315146942.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-27 04:24:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Rename Windows Virtual Desktop to: Azure Virtual Desktop,architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement example-scenario/subsvc triaged,"
Rename Windows Virtual Desktop to: Azure Virtual Desktop
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Windows Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Rename Windows Virtual Desktop to: Azure Virtual Desktop -
Rename Windows Virtual Desktop to: Azure Virtual Desktop
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Windows Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,rename windows virtual desktop to azure virtual desktop rename windows virtual desktop to azure virtual desktop document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11527,30822158962.0,IssuesEvent,2023-08-01 17:08:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AD DS Join No Longer Required,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
This document specifies that AVD session hosts must be AD DS joined, which is no longer true with AAD-join now supported.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/a55bc8cac84bce0542f97154645bf0c412740fed/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-content.md?plain=1#L48
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Azure Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop?context=%2Fazure%2Fvirtual-desktop%2Fcontext%2Fcontext)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1.0,"AD DS Join No Longer Required -
[Enter feedback here]
This document specifies that AVD session hosts must be AD DS joined, which is no longer true with AAD-join now supported.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/a55bc8cac84bce0542f97154645bf0c412740fed/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-content.md?plain=1#L48
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Azure Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop?context=%2Fazure%2Fvirtual-desktop%2Fcontext%2Fcontext)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1,ad ds join no longer required this document specifies that avd session hosts must be ad ds joined which is no longer true with aad join now supported document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login tomhickling microsoft alias thhickli ,1
9180,24171709864.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-22 19:52:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Suggestion to add Azure Queue Storage as a technology choice option for a message broker,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"Suggestion to add Azure Queue Storage as a technology choice option for a message broker:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/messaging#technology-choices-for-a-message-broker
And to also add a link to this page
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-bus-messaging/service-bus-azure-and-service-bus-queues-compared-contrasted
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4503ec57-36ef-8040-b6de-5b5a1fea1590
* Version Independent ID: 509de364-6faf-e11e-41e0-c2f6cb8583f6
* Content: [Asynchronous messaging options in Azure - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/messaging)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/messaging.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/messaging.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Suggestion to add Azure Queue Storage as a technology choice option for a message broker - Suggestion to add Azure Queue Storage as a technology choice option for a message broker:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/messaging#technology-choices-for-a-message-broker
And to also add a link to this page
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-bus-messaging/service-bus-azure-and-service-bus-queues-compared-contrasted
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4503ec57-36ef-8040-b6de-5b5a1fea1590
* Version Independent ID: 509de364-6faf-e11e-41e0-c2f6cb8583f6
* Content: [Asynchronous messaging options in Azure - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/messaging)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/messaging.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/messaging.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,suggestion to add azure queue storage as a technology choice option for a message broker suggestion to add azure queue storage as a technology choice option for a message broker and to also add a link to this page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10356,26833000541.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 17:16:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,IoT scenario should use IoT Hub or IoT Central,assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"It is called out in the below that one of the use cases is IoT, instead of landing IoT telemetry to event hub, we should use IoT Hub or IoT central.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real-time analytics on big data architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"IoT scenario should use IoT Hub or IoT Central - It is called out in the below that one of the use cases is IoT, instead of landing IoT telemetry to event hub, we should use IoT Hub or IoT central.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real-time analytics on big data architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,iot scenario should use iot hub or iot central it is called out in the below that one of the use cases is iot instead of landing iot telemetry to event hub we should use iot hub or iot central document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9130,24059518355.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 20:34:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Equivalent to AWS Service Catalog,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3,"AWS Service Catalog isn't listed in this page and I think it should be.
My feeling is that it would be in the marketplace section and that the equivalent would be Azure Managed Applications",1.0,"Equivalent to AWS Service Catalog - AWS Service Catalog isn't listed in this page and I think it should be.
My feeling is that it would be in the marketplace section and that the equivalent would be Azure Managed Applications",1,equivalent to aws service catalog aws service catalog isn t listed in this page and i think it should be my feeling is that it would be in the marketplace section and that the equivalent would be azure managed applications,1
10139,26383047461.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-12 10:07:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Missing icon for ""region""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"I'm unable to find a suitable icon to represent an Azure region. There is a globe, however there's no indication of a particular location on the globe.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing icon for ""region"" - I'm unable to find a suitable icon to represent an Azure region. There is a globe, however there's no indication of a particular location on the globe.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing icon for region i m unable to find a suitable icon to represent an azure region there is a globe however there s no indication of a particular location on the globe document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9570,24845833233.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-26 15:48:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,DataProducts link is not working,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
When clicking the link for 'data product' mentioned in the line 'Establish a data product architecture', it opens up a page with '404- Content not found'.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5f10895e-4e1d-1cdd-2d57-32880e0cc45a
* Version Independent ID: 3518d0a5-ffd1-dfa7-6d6b-de2a9ef170d6
* Content: [Analytics end-to-end with Azure Synapse - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @fabragaMS
* Microsoft Alias: **fabraga**",1.0,"DataProducts link is not working -
[Enter feedback here]
When clicking the link for 'data product' mentioned in the line 'Establish a data product architecture', it opens up a page with '404- Content not found'.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5f10895e-4e1d-1cdd-2d57-32880e0cc45a
* Version Independent ID: 3518d0a5-ffd1-dfa7-6d6b-de2a9ef170d6
* Content: [Analytics end-to-end with Azure Synapse - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @fabragaMS
* Microsoft Alias: **fabraga**",1,dataproducts link is not working when clicking the link for data product mentioned in the line establish a data product architecture it opens up a page with content not found document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login fabragams microsoft alias fabraga ,1
3742,10077714278.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-24 19:25:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Establish a modern perimeter,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-design-principles/subsvc cxp triaged,"The hyperlinks don't direct anywhere. ie: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/security/governance.md#enterprise-segmentation-strategy delivers a 404 response
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 55000863-6c61-319b-7d0d-5366c403e5e2
* Version Independent ID: 7bb9bb22-f939-6176-236f-79399b6ab2b4
* Content: [Security in Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/security/overview#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/security/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/security/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Establish a modern perimeter - The hyperlinks don't direct anywhere. ie: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/security/governance.md#enterprise-segmentation-strategy delivers a 404 response
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 55000863-6c61-319b-7d0d-5366c403e5e2
* Version Independent ID: 7bb9bb22-f939-6176-236f-79399b6ab2b4
* Content: [Security in Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/security/overview#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/security/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/security/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,establish a modern perimeter the hyperlinks don t direct anywhere ie delivers a response document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
6043,13542523963.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 17:28:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Awesome!,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author kudos solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
This is great use case! Any detailing would be much appreciated! Especially on selection of each of the tools ,their pros and cons.And any issues or anti-pattern to watch for.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c2a5d359-b35d-f8c1-480e-ea9aff4255b5
* Version Independent ID: 971a1042-d297-7cda-2961-3f5b1b422a9b
* Content: [Anomaly Detector Process - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Awesome! -
[Enter feedback here]
This is great use case! Any detailing would be much appreciated! Especially on selection of each of the tools ,their pros and cons.And any issues or anti-pattern to watch for.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c2a5d359-b35d-f8c1-480e-ea9aff4255b5
* Version Independent ID: 971a1042-d297-7cda-2961-3f5b1b422a9b
* Content: [Anomaly Detector Process - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,awesome this is great use case any detailing would be much appreciated especially on selection of each of the tools their pros and cons and any issues or anti pattern to watch for document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10361,26838134781.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 21:22:52,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Dados,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"Sensacional!
[Insira comentários aqui]
---
#### Detalhes do documento
⚠ *Não edite esta seção. É necessário para a vinculação de problema do learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub.*
* ID: fcb3c6d7-aa3e-9a76-181b-d0963ac685b9
* Version Independent ID: da9c883b-93bf-8864-015a-a7b10a6fcb5f
* Content: [ETL (extrair, transformar e carregar) - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/pt-br/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/etl)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/etl.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/relational-data/etl.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @raunakjhawar
* Microsoft Alias: **rajhawar**",1.0,"Dados - Sensacional!
[Insira comentários aqui]
---
#### Detalhes do documento
⚠ *Não edite esta seção. É necessário para a vinculação de problema do learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub.*
* ID: fcb3c6d7-aa3e-9a76-181b-d0963ac685b9
* Version Independent ID: da9c883b-93bf-8864-015a-a7b10a6fcb5f
* Content: [ETL (extrair, transformar e carregar) - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/pt-br/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/etl)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/etl.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/relational-data/etl.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @raunakjhawar
* Microsoft Alias: **rajhawar**",1,dados sensacional detalhes do documento ⚠ não edite esta seção é necessário para a vinculação de problema do learn microsoft com ➟ github id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login raunakjhawar microsoft alias rajhawar ,1
10716,27320142861.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-24 19:03:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Confusing statement - App Service - Seperate Plan for Production and Test,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"We used to say all deployment slots with default as Production and other slots like Pre-Prod etc. This brings good cost saving for customer - I can understand from security and management good to keep 2 seperate but can they be merged and we can configure authentication and authorization seperately.
I can understand to keep performance environment out because of common shared infra but can we just re-evaluate this statement.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f14bdf5c-81b0-76df-4c61-3b4eca2435ae
* Version Independent ID: 433531d0-bedf-ce5c-a747-ce1d6b6bea5f
* Content: [Resiliency checklist for services - Azure Design Review Framework](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/checklist/resiliency-per-service)
* Content Source: [docs/checklist/resiliency-per-service.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/checklist/resiliency-per-service.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Confusing statement - App Service - Seperate Plan for Production and Test - We used to say all deployment slots with default as Production and other slots like Pre-Prod etc. This brings good cost saving for customer - I can understand from security and management good to keep 2 seperate but can they be merged and we can configure authentication and authorization seperately.
I can understand to keep performance environment out because of common shared infra but can we just re-evaluate this statement.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f14bdf5c-81b0-76df-4c61-3b4eca2435ae
* Version Independent ID: 433531d0-bedf-ce5c-a747-ce1d6b6bea5f
* Content: [Resiliency checklist for services - Azure Design Review Framework](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/checklist/resiliency-per-service)
* Content Source: [docs/checklist/resiliency-per-service.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/checklist/resiliency-per-service.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,confusing statement app service seperate plan for production and test we used to say all deployment slots with default as production and other slots like pre prod etc this brings good cost saving for customer i can understand from security and management good to keep seperate but can they be merged and we can configure authentication and authorization seperately i can understand to keep performance environment out because of common shared infra but can we just re evaluate this statement document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id bedf content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9832,25343271248.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-19 00:45:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SQL Server Availability Group Wording Fixes,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"Within this [Workflow](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery-experiment#workflow) section, the following bolded words and phrases are kinda/sorta not accurate and may confuse readers:
> The database tier can be configured to use Always On availability groups. With this SQL Server configuration, one primary **database** within **a cluster** is configured with up to eight secondary **databases**. If an issue occurs with the primary **database**, the **cluster fails** over to one of the secondary **databases**, allowing the application to remain available. For more information, see [Overview of Always On availability groups for SQL Server](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/availability-groups/windows/overview-of-always-on-availability-groups-sql-server).
I would suggest the following edits to reflect the concept of primary and secondary 'replicas' within an Availability Group, removing the reference to a cluster failing over given Availability Groups are not true Failover Cluster Deployments of SQL Server, and minor other edits to ensure clarity. For reference, the official listing of Availability Group terms and conditions can be found [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/availability-groups/windows/always-on-availability-groups-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver16#TermsAndDefinitions)
Proposed edits are _**bold and italic**_:
> The database tier can be configured to use Always On availability groups. With this SQL Server configuration, one primary read/write _**replica**_ within _**an availability group**_ is configured with up to eight secondary _**read-only replicas**_. If an issue occurs with the primary _**replica**_, the _**availability group fails over primary read/write activity**_ to one of the secondary _**replicas**_, allowing the application to remain available. For more information, see [Overview of Always On availability groups for SQL Server](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/availability-groups/windows/overview-of-always-on-availability-groups-sql-server).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5e6bcac8-81a4-74ef-8287-6a185c564e84
* Version Independent ID: 5e6bcac8-81a4-74ef-8287-6a185c564e84
* Content: [Multi-tier web application built for HA/DR - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery-experiment)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery-experiment.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery-experiment.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @sujayt
* Microsoft Alias: **sutalasi**",1.0,"SQL Server Availability Group Wording Fixes - Within this [Workflow](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery-experiment#workflow) section, the following bolded words and phrases are kinda/sorta not accurate and may confuse readers:
> The database tier can be configured to use Always On availability groups. With this SQL Server configuration, one primary **database** within **a cluster** is configured with up to eight secondary **databases**. If an issue occurs with the primary **database**, the **cluster fails** over to one of the secondary **databases**, allowing the application to remain available. For more information, see [Overview of Always On availability groups for SQL Server](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/availability-groups/windows/overview-of-always-on-availability-groups-sql-server).
I would suggest the following edits to reflect the concept of primary and secondary 'replicas' within an Availability Group, removing the reference to a cluster failing over given Availability Groups are not true Failover Cluster Deployments of SQL Server, and minor other edits to ensure clarity. For reference, the official listing of Availability Group terms and conditions can be found [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/availability-groups/windows/always-on-availability-groups-sql-server?view=sql-server-ver16#TermsAndDefinitions)
Proposed edits are _**bold and italic**_:
> The database tier can be configured to use Always On availability groups. With this SQL Server configuration, one primary read/write _**replica**_ within _**an availability group**_ is configured with up to eight secondary _**read-only replicas**_. If an issue occurs with the primary _**replica**_, the _**availability group fails over primary read/write activity**_ to one of the secondary _**replicas**_, allowing the application to remain available. For more information, see [Overview of Always On availability groups for SQL Server](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/availability-groups/windows/overview-of-always-on-availability-groups-sql-server).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5e6bcac8-81a4-74ef-8287-6a185c564e84
* Version Independent ID: 5e6bcac8-81a4-74ef-8287-6a185c564e84
* Content: [Multi-tier web application built for HA/DR - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery-experiment)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery-experiment.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery-experiment.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @sujayt
* Microsoft Alias: **sutalasi**",1,sql server availability group wording fixes within this section the following bolded words and phrases are kinda sorta not accurate and may confuse readers the database tier can be configured to use always on availability groups with this sql server configuration one primary database within a cluster is configured with up to eight secondary databases if an issue occurs with the primary database the cluster fails over to one of the secondary databases allowing the application to remain available for more information see i would suggest the following edits to reflect the concept of primary and secondary replicas within an availability group removing the reference to a cluster failing over given availability groups are not true failover cluster deployments of sql server and minor other edits to ensure clarity for reference the official listing of availability group terms and conditions can be found proposed edits are bold and italic the database tier can be configured to use always on availability groups with this sql server configuration one primary read write replica within an availability group is configured with up to eight secondary read only replicas if an issue occurs with the primary replica the availability group fails over primary read write activity to one of the secondary replicas allowing the application to remain available for more information see document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login sujayt microsoft alias sutalasi ,1
9561,24816107788.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-25 13:16:52,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Building Solutions for High Availability Using Availability Zones,assigned-to-author kudos triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Very useful
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Building Solutions for High Availability Using Availability Zones -
Very useful
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,building solutions for high availability using availability zones very useful document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
10611,27145799514.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-16 19:53:30,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Bad link to the cosmosdb etcd api,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"Page contains a link for ""etcd API (preview)"", which no longer exists. Looks like the etcd preview api was pulled/removed.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e40cb85c-ee53-7b49-0622-bed8ebedea81
* Version Independent ID: 896e0838-dfd1-c442-414d-ad9ea6dc8f7d
* Content: [Understand data store models - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Bad link to the cosmosdb etcd api - Page contains a link for ""etcd API (preview)"", which no longer exists. Looks like the etcd preview api was pulled/removed.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e40cb85c-ee53-7b49-0622-bed8ebedea81
* Version Independent ID: 896e0838-dfd1-c442-414d-ad9ea6dc8f7d
* Content: [Understand data store models - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,bad link to the cosmosdb etcd api page contains a link for etcd api preview which no longer exists looks like the etcd preview api was pulled removed document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dsk microsoft alias pnp ,1
3876,10239329825.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 17:59:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can the template consume complex objects or only simple types?,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"From the examples it appears you always have to reference the terminal string values in the object (through indexes and dot operators all the way down) but it doesn't say that in the article. It might be worth mentioning this explicitly.
It would be great for example if, when you have the same structure in part of your parameter object, you could simply do something like: `""subnets"": parameters('VNetSettings').subnets` instead of having to pick the object apart and redeclare it all over again in what is a very fragile and hard to maintain process.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa870d42-1b00-d600-4fef-dd67219a1dc6
* Version Independent ID: 61fa68a5-a08b-7693-ebfd-18711ebd1bbb
* Content: [Use an object as a parameter in an Azure Resource Manager template](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters)
* Content Source: [docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @petertay
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can the template consume complex objects or only simple types? - From the examples it appears you always have to reference the terminal string values in the object (through indexes and dot operators all the way down) but it doesn't say that in the article. It might be worth mentioning this explicitly.
It would be great for example if, when you have the same structure in part of your parameter object, you could simply do something like: `""subnets"": parameters('VNetSettings').subnets` instead of having to pick the object apart and redeclare it all over again in what is a very fragile and hard to maintain process.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa870d42-1b00-d600-4fef-dd67219a1dc6
* Version Independent ID: 61fa68a5-a08b-7693-ebfd-18711ebd1bbb
* Content: [Use an object as a parameter in an Azure Resource Manager template](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters)
* Content Source: [docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @petertay
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can the template consume complex objects or only simple types from the examples it appears you always have to reference the terminal string values in the object through indexes and dot operators all the way down but it doesn t say that in the article it might be worth mentioning this explicitly it would be great for example if when you have the same structure in part of your parameter object you could simply do something like subnets parameters vnetsettings subnets instead of having to pick the object apart and redeclare it all over again in what is a very fragile and hard to maintain process document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id ebfd content content source service architecture center github login petertay microsoft alias pnp ,1
11125,28092664735.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-30 13:59:16,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Zonal vs Zone Redundant List seems inaccurate,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"The list of zonal (z) vs zone redundant(zr) seems inaccurate
Example: AKs is listed as zonal, yet in when you deploy a AKS cluster you only select _1_ subnet and declare all the zones you want deployed to. This is a not a zone-isolated deployment. Instead a single subnet hosts a resource that spans multiple zones. To me this is ZR. If this were zonal, I should be passing a list of subnets to AKS, and each subnet should have a NATGW assigned to it to create a zonal promise. As of now, I can't self-architect the resiliency which is what I expect from a zonal deployment per the description.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with Availability Zones - High Availability](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Zonal vs Zone Redundant List seems inaccurate - The list of zonal (z) vs zone redundant(zr) seems inaccurate
Example: AKs is listed as zonal, yet in when you deploy a AKS cluster you only select _1_ subnet and declare all the zones you want deployed to. This is a not a zone-isolated deployment. Instead a single subnet hosts a resource that spans multiple zones. To me this is ZR. If this were zonal, I should be passing a list of subnets to AKS, and each subnet should have a NATGW assigned to it to create a zonal promise. As of now, I can't self-architect the resiliency which is what I expect from a zonal deployment per the description.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with Availability Zones - High Availability](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,zonal vs zone redundant list seems inaccurate the list of zonal z vs zone redundant zr seems inaccurate example aks is listed as zonal yet in when you deploy a aks cluster you only select subnet and declare all the zones you want deployed to this is a not a zone isolated deployment instead a single subnet hosts a resource that spans multiple zones to me this is zr if this were zonal i should be passing a list of subnets to aks and each subnet should have a natgw assigned to it to create a zonal promise as of now i can t self architect the resiliency which is what i expect from a zonal deployment per the description document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
5003,11942362683.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 20:09:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AWS AppSync equivalent for Azure,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Missing the AWS AppSync service from AWS and its respective equivalent in Azure. May be some more services would be there which are in AWS and not in Azure
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"AWS AppSync equivalent for Azure - Missing the AWS AppSync service from AWS and its respective equivalent in Azure. May be some more services would be there which are in AWS and not in Azure
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,aws appsync equivalent for azure missing the aws appsync service from aws and its respective equivalent in azure may be some more services would be there which are in aws and not in azure document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
10089,26224074362.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-04 17:03:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please expand,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"Great reference material, those of us in HIM would benefit greatly from more information, such as potential use cases, alternative services, implementation considerations, or pricing guidance.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b8be93cf-da00-d500-09fa-85388e8e9c4e
* Version Independent ID: abf64496-ef01-7b90-4819-8236621bde94
* Content: [Population health management for healthcare - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/population-health-management-for-healthcare)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/population-health-management-for-healthcare.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/population-health-management-for-healthcare.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @krisbock
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please expand - Great reference material, those of us in HIM would benefit greatly from more information, such as potential use cases, alternative services, implementation considerations, or pricing guidance.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b8be93cf-da00-d500-09fa-85388e8e9c4e
* Version Independent ID: abf64496-ef01-7b90-4819-8236621bde94
* Content: [Population health management for healthcare - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/population-health-management-for-healthcare)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/population-health-management-for-healthcare.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/population-health-management-for-healthcare.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @krisbock
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please expand great reference material those of us in him would benefit greatly from more information such as potential use cases alternative services implementation considerations or pricing guidance document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login krisbock microsoft alias pnp ,1
7183,16987527903.0,IssuesEvent,2021-06-30 15:57:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Great page!,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author kudos reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
This information is really helpful! Especially the ""Considerations"" section is awesome!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 Operations Guide - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Great page! -
This information is really helpful! Especially the ""Considerations"" section is awesome!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 Operations Guide - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,great page this information is really helpful especially the considerations section is awesome document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login rishabhsaha microsoft alias pnp ,1
10472,26995347515.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-10 00:13:01,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing explanation for NoSQL secondary indexes,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 design-pattern/subsvc,"There needs to be an explanation as to why NoSQL databases don't typically offer this feature to the extent the way SQL databases do.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/ea468dd927470a79edd7ce968918e6232e5f28e4/docs/patterns/index-table.md?plain=1#L34
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 36982a55-b653-9f6b-6b51-f50105abde18
* Version Independent ID: 81ada183-46a5-9101-7f53-b008e83c7f68
* Content: [Index Table pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/index-table)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index-table.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/index-table.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing explanation for NoSQL secondary indexes - There needs to be an explanation as to why NoSQL databases don't typically offer this feature to the extent the way SQL databases do.
https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/blob/ea468dd927470a79edd7ce968918e6232e5f28e4/docs/patterns/index-table.md?plain=1#L34
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 36982a55-b653-9f6b-6b51-f50105abde18
* Version Independent ID: 81ada183-46a5-9101-7f53-b008e83c7f68
* Content: [Index Table pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/index-table)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index-table.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/index-table.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing explanation for nosql secondary indexes there needs to be an explanation as to why nosql databases don t typically offer this feature to the extent the way sql databases do document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
5354,12394630070.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-20 17:15:13,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Build Test issue,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Build Test issue -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,build test issue document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6562,14889671981.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-20 21:47:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Downloaded SVG is not scalable,Pri2 architecture-center/svc solution-idea/subsvc,"Download as SVG is a PNG embedded in an SVG file. It would be amazingly helpful if the included graphics were segregated into discrete vector images.
Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Downloaded SVG is not scalable - Download as SVG is a PNG embedded in an SVG file. It would be amazingly helpful if the included graphics were segregated into discrete vector images.
Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,downloaded svg is not scalable download as svg is a png embedded in an svg file it would be amazingly helpful if the included graphics were segregated into discrete vector images thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10909,27455821194.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-02 21:15:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can sustainable coding practices or green coding also be available ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Can sustainable coding practices or green coding also be available under responsible coding?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 33f1a7ed-041f-c313-9a25-facdc4aebea4
* Version Independent ID: 20908b14-6258-ae56-73bc-323e5c9ac75b
* Content: [Responsible Innovation toolkit - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/responsible-innovation/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/responsible-innovation/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/responsible-innovation/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dcass
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can sustainable coding practices or green coding also be available -
[Enter feedback here]
Can sustainable coding practices or green coding also be available under responsible coding?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 33f1a7ed-041f-c313-9a25-facdc4aebea4
* Version Independent ID: 20908b14-6258-ae56-73bc-323e5c9ac75b
* Content: [Responsible Innovation toolkit - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/responsible-innovation/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/responsible-innovation/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/responsible-innovation/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dcass
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can sustainable coding practices or green coding also be available can sustainable coding practices or green coding also be available under responsible coding document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dcass microsoft alias pnp ,1
3575,9811185881.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-12 22:40:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Well thought introduction & comment on Domain model - knowledge graph approach similarity,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author kudos triaged,"Thanks for easy to read introduction. The process resambles knowledge graph design approach. In the knowledge graph approach, you focus is on business semantics ""what is needed, what things means"" - rather than what data data we have and where it is stored. That makes me think, that micro services approach would benefit from semantic data modeling and vice versa. As you design knowledge graph, you have to check with micro services tema that you can deliver aggregated in desired scope and structure (method <--> SPARQL queries etc.) . Micro services would benefit from knowlegde graph approach, by letting graph query to integrate scattered data (or some may say data via metadata). Your service would become decoupled completely from data structures, i.e. letting you easily change, extend the returned data set - simply by modifying your graph query, and not touching the micro services code at all.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e55d3a73-7618-45ba-b281-bb70dd258842
* Version Independent ID: 7f5cd352-0998-a214-8dfc-c19898cecd21
* Content: [Domain analysis for microservices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/model/domain-analysis#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/model/domain-analysis.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/model/domain-analysis.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Well thought introduction & comment on Domain model - knowledge graph approach similarity - Thanks for easy to read introduction. The process resambles knowledge graph design approach. In the knowledge graph approach, you focus is on business semantics ""what is needed, what things means"" - rather than what data data we have and where it is stored. That makes me think, that micro services approach would benefit from semantic data modeling and vice versa. As you design knowledge graph, you have to check with micro services tema that you can deliver aggregated in desired scope and structure (method <--> SPARQL queries etc.) . Micro services would benefit from knowlegde graph approach, by letting graph query to integrate scattered data (or some may say data via metadata). Your service would become decoupled completely from data structures, i.e. letting you easily change, extend the returned data set - simply by modifying your graph query, and not touching the micro services code at all.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e55d3a73-7618-45ba-b281-bb70dd258842
* Version Independent ID: 7f5cd352-0998-a214-8dfc-c19898cecd21
* Content: [Domain analysis for microservices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/model/domain-analysis#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/model/domain-analysis.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/model/domain-analysis.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,well thought introduction comment on domain model knowledge graph approach similarity thanks for easy to read introduction the process resambles knowledge graph design approach in the knowledge graph approach you focus is on business semantics what is needed what things means rather than what data data we have and where it is stored that makes me think that micro services approach would benefit from semantic data modeling and vice versa as you design knowledge graph you have to check with micro services tema that you can deliver aggregated in desired scope and structure method lt gt sparql queries etc micro services would benefit from knowlegde graph approach by letting graph query to integrate scattered data or some may say data via metadata your service would become decoupled completely from data structures i e letting you easily change extend the returned data set simply by modifying your graph query and not touching the micro services code at all document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
11144,28126854100.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-31 18:31:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incorrect capability listed twice here,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"PIM / JIT access is not supported for AWS. As per this article:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/saas-apps/amazon-web-service-tutorial
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6b08461-26fb-d148-a749-9b61217af0f8
* Version Independent ID: 1329c651-e8f6-cc68-4205-739dfbbcef4f
* Content: [Azure AD security for AWS - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",2.0,"Incorrect capability listed twice here - PIM / JIT access is not supported for AWS. As per this article:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/saas-apps/amazon-web-service-tutorial
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6b08461-26fb-d148-a749-9b61217af0f8
* Version Independent ID: 1329c651-e8f6-cc68-4205-739dfbbcef4f
* Content: [Azure AD security for AWS - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/aws/aws-azure-ad-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,incorrect capability listed twice here pim jit access is not supported for aws as per this article document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
4510,11266907496.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-14 00:19:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mismatch between Architecture Guide and Navigation Pane,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Within the Azure Architecture Guide under ""Technology Choices"", the two items listed are ""choosing a compute service"" and ""choosing a data store"". However, in the navigation pane under ""Technology Choices"", the two items listed are ""choosing a compute service"" and ""choosing a load balancing service"".
Thus each section (navigation and the main page) is missing one of the three technology choices.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Mismatch between Architecture Guide and Navigation Pane - Within the Azure Architecture Guide under ""Technology Choices"", the two items listed are ""choosing a compute service"" and ""choosing a data store"". However, in the navigation pane under ""Technology Choices"", the two items listed are ""choosing a compute service"" and ""choosing a load balancing service"".
Thus each section (navigation and the main page) is missing one of the three technology choices.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,mismatch between architecture guide and navigation pane within the azure architecture guide under technology choices the two items listed are choosing a compute service and choosing a data store however in the navigation pane under technology choices the two items listed are choosing a compute service and choosing a load balancing service thus each section navigation and the main page is missing one of the three technology choices document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
3763,10101427608.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-29 08:43:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,About Set up autoscaling,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp site-recovery/svc triaged,"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/cloud-adoption/migrate/azure-best-practices/contoso-migration-refactor-linux-app-service-mysql#set-up-autoscaling
3. They configure the same setting on APP-SRV-CUS to ensure that the same behavior applies if the app fails over to the secondary region. The only difference is that they set the instance limit to 1 since this is for failovers only.
##Correct me if I am wrong, I assume it should be##
3. They configure the same setting on APP-SRV-CUS to ensure that the same behavior applies if the app fails over to the secondary region. The only difference is that they set the default instance to 1 since this is for failovers only.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9dd12ea5-4d78-d0ed-01fd-baae3c9d9b7f
* Version Independent ID: 1b2221be-3378-7594-9dd9-eb5e69b12613
* Content: [Refactor a Linux service desk app to Azure App Service and Azure Database for MySQL - Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework for Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/cloud-adoption/migrate/azure-best-practices/contoso-migration-refactor-linux-app-service-mysql#set-up-autoscaling)
* Content Source: [docs/cloud-adoption/migrate/azure-best-practices/contoso-migration-refactor-linux-app-service-mysql.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/cloud-adoption/migrate/azure-best-practices/contoso-migration-refactor-linux-app-service-mysql.md)
* Service: **site-recovery**
* GitHub Login: @BrianBlanchard
* Microsoft Alias: **brblanch**",1.0,"About Set up autoscaling - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/cloud-adoption/migrate/azure-best-practices/contoso-migration-refactor-linux-app-service-mysql#set-up-autoscaling
3. They configure the same setting on APP-SRV-CUS to ensure that the same behavior applies if the app fails over to the secondary region. The only difference is that they set the instance limit to 1 since this is for failovers only.
##Correct me if I am wrong, I assume it should be##
3. They configure the same setting on APP-SRV-CUS to ensure that the same behavior applies if the app fails over to the secondary region. The only difference is that they set the default instance to 1 since this is for failovers only.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9dd12ea5-4d78-d0ed-01fd-baae3c9d9b7f
* Version Independent ID: 1b2221be-3378-7594-9dd9-eb5e69b12613
* Content: [Refactor a Linux service desk app to Azure App Service and Azure Database for MySQL - Microsoft Cloud Adoption Framework for Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/cloud-adoption/migrate/azure-best-practices/contoso-migration-refactor-linux-app-service-mysql#set-up-autoscaling)
* Content Source: [docs/cloud-adoption/migrate/azure-best-practices/contoso-migration-refactor-linux-app-service-mysql.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/cloud-adoption/migrate/azure-best-practices/contoso-migration-refactor-linux-app-service-mysql.md)
* Service: **site-recovery**
* GitHub Login: @BrianBlanchard
* Microsoft Alias: **brblanch**",1,about set up autoscaling they configure the same setting on app srv cus to ensure that the same behavior applies if the app fails over to the secondary region the only difference is that they set the instance limit to since this is for failovers only correct me if i am wrong i assume it should be they configure the same setting on app srv cus to ensure that the same behavior applies if the app fails over to the secondary region the only difference is that they set the default instance to since this is for failovers only document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service site recovery github login brianblanchard microsoft alias brblanch ,1
9775,25184053338.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-11 16:11:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,There is no step mentioned for Virtual network creation before retrieval of VNET information after the resource group creation step. ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"There is no step mentioned for Virtual network creation before retrieval of VNET information after the resource group creation step.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **fabriciosanchez**",2.0,"There is no step mentioned for Virtual network creation before retrieval of VNET information after the resource group creation step. - There is no step mentioned for Virtual network creation before retrieval of VNET information after the resource group creation step.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **fabriciosanchez**",1,there is no step mentioned for virtual network creation before retrieval of vnet information after the resource group creation step there is no step mentioned for virtual network creation before retrieval of vnet information after the resource group creation step document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fada content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login fabriciosanchez microsoft alias fabriciosanchez ,1
9759,25160948642.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 16:45:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Summary table zonal (Z) and zone-redundant (ZR) Azure services.,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Some services seem to be missing
- Azure PostgreSQL Flexible Server (ZR)
- Azure MySQL Flexible Server (ZR)
- Azure Managed Disks (ZRS) in preview)
Some questions too
- Should not ExpressRoute be both (Z, ZR)
- Should not Application Gateway v2 be both (Z, ZR)
This table is interesting but does not look up-to-date and fully accurate. Thanks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Building solutions for high availability using Availability Zones - High Availability](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @Maggsl
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Summary table zonal (Z) and zone-redundant (ZR) Azure services. - Some services seem to be missing
- Azure PostgreSQL Flexible Server (ZR)
- Azure MySQL Flexible Server (ZR)
- Azure Managed Disks (ZRS) in preview)
Some questions too
- Should not ExpressRoute be both (Z, ZR)
- Should not Application Gateway v2 be both (Z, ZR)
This table is interesting but does not look up-to-date and fully accurate. Thanks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Building solutions for high availability using Availability Zones - High Availability](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @Maggsl
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,summary table zonal z and zone redundant zr azure services some services seem to be missing azure postgresql flexible server zr azure mysql flexible server zr azure managed disks zrs in preview some questions too should not expressroute be both z zr should not application gateway be both z zr this table is interesting but does not look up to date and fully accurate thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login maggsl microsoft alias pnp ,1
9636,24944523705.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-31 22:13:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,There is a different file under the Visio link,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Good day,
I just noticed that the Visio file I get when clicking the ""Download (https://arch-center.azureedge.net/dmz-reference-architectures.vsdx) a Visio file of this architecture."" is different than the one displayed in the article: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/images/dmz-private.png
Regards,
Karlis
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 74bb4b25-ebe2-264d-047d-3f651c52a9c5
* Version Independent ID: aed6ebef-6157-9608-3f85-0807c7fdf61d
* Content: [Implement a secure hybrid network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz?tabs=portal#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"There is a different file under the Visio link -
Good day,
I just noticed that the Visio file I get when clicking the ""Download (https://arch-center.azureedge.net/dmz-reference-architectures.vsdx) a Visio file of this architecture."" is different than the one displayed in the article: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/images/dmz-private.png
Regards,
Karlis
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 74bb4b25-ebe2-264d-047d-3f651c52a9c5
* Version Independent ID: aed6ebef-6157-9608-3f85-0807c7fdf61d
* Content: [Implement a secure hybrid network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz?tabs=portal#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,there is a different file under the visio link good day i just noticed that the visio file i get when clicking the download a visio file of this architecture is different than the one displayed in the article regards karlis document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5553,12699753113.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 15:17:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Cost considerations for bandwidth for VNET Peering should be added,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Hi Tech-Doc Team,
[I was looking at the cost considerations. ](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server#cost-considerations)
The Blueprint shows a VNET-peering, which leads to some costs.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/virtual-network/
It should be listed as well to make the picture more complete.
Proposed content:
**VNET-Peering pricing**
A high-availability deployment that leverages multiple Azure Regions will make use of VNET-Peering. There are different charges for VNET-Peering within the same region and for Global VNET-Peering. [Learn more.](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/virtual-network/)
Regards
Sven
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: be033e7f-d78f-f63f-c9b5-f08130315704
* Version Independent ID: d66f5650-fffb-79a6-ee59-40eaad06cd4f
* Content: [Multi-region N-tier application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Cost considerations for bandwidth for VNET Peering should be added - Hi Tech-Doc Team,
[I was looking at the cost considerations. ](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server#cost-considerations)
The Blueprint shows a VNET-peering, which leads to some costs.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/virtual-network/
It should be listed as well to make the picture more complete.
Proposed content:
**VNET-Peering pricing**
A high-availability deployment that leverages multiple Azure Regions will make use of VNET-Peering. There are different charges for VNET-Peering within the same region and for Global VNET-Peering. [Learn more.](https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/details/virtual-network/)
Regards
Sven
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: be033e7f-d78f-f63f-c9b5-f08130315704
* Version Independent ID: d66f5650-fffb-79a6-ee59-40eaad06cd4f
* Content: [Multi-region N-tier application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,cost considerations for bandwidth for vnet peering should be added hi tech doc team the blueprint shows a vnet peering which leads to some costs it should be listed as well to make the picture more complete proposed content vnet peering pricing a high availability deployment that leverages multiple azure regions will make use of vnet peering there are different charges for vnet peering within the same region and for global vnet peering regards sven document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fffb content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5240,12254816675.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-06 09:08:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Kubernetes-KeyVault-FlexVolume deprecated,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"""For more information, see the Kubernetes-KeyVault-FlexVolume project on GitHub."" but this project https://github.com/Azure/kubernetes-keyvault-flexvol is deprecated in favour of https://github.com/Azure/secrets-store-csi-driver-provider-azure
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/aks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Kubernetes-KeyVault-FlexVolume deprecated - ""For more information, see the Kubernetes-KeyVault-FlexVolume project on GitHub."" but this project https://github.com/Azure/kubernetes-keyvault-flexvol is deprecated in favour of https://github.com/Azure/secrets-store-csi-driver-provider-azure
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/aks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,kubernetes keyvault flexvolume deprecated for more information see the kubernetes keyvault flexvolume project on github but this project is deprecated in favour of document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6528,14750028552.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-08 01:01:01,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add Azure Functions as another hosting environment,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Azure Functions should be a good option to host background jobs as well. It should be added as another hosting environment.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Add Azure Functions as another hosting environment - Azure Functions should be a good option to host background jobs as well. It should be added as another hosting environment.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,add azure functions as another hosting environment azure functions should be a good option to host background jobs as well it should be added as another hosting environment document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id dcef content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6475,14620752024.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-22 20:18:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Is this up-to-date, as GitHub response says the code base is in sustain?",Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Is this page up-to-date, as GitHub response says the code base is in sustain?
i.e. at https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/issues/2084#issuecomment-617326234
*@josem0287 Please don't use AZBB. The code base is in sustain and no further development is scheduled. *
It would be good to have at least an indication that it's no longer being developed
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 00c819aa-de8a-5fb2-72ae-78119e03345f
* Version Independent ID: 2b681a1d-c6f1-4926-a09f-7bfc45ec690b
* Content: [Extend Azure Resource Manager template functionality - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/building-blocks/extending-templates/)
* Content Source: [docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Is this up-to-date, as GitHub response says the code base is in sustain? - Is this page up-to-date, as GitHub response says the code base is in sustain?
i.e. at https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/issues/2084#issuecomment-617326234
*@josem0287 Please don't use AZBB. The code base is in sustain and no further development is scheduled. *
It would be good to have at least an indication that it's no longer being developed
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 00c819aa-de8a-5fb2-72ae-78119e03345f
* Version Independent ID: 2b681a1d-c6f1-4926-a09f-7bfc45ec690b
* Content: [Extend Azure Resource Manager template functionality - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/building-blocks/extending-templates/)
* Content Source: [docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,is this up to date as github response says the code base is in sustain is this page up to date as github response says the code base is in sustain i e at please don t use azbb the code base is in sustain and no further development is scheduled it would be good to have at least an indication that it s no longer being developed document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6047,13543216711.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 18:36:12,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Offline installer,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Please can you give more insights on the offline installer?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9deb5142-8bb3-bfec-1775-bbb7f49364ed
* Version Independent ID: c1de3271-22f4-d472-f4ba-697e398c1dfa
* Content: [AI at the Edge with Azure Stack - disconnected - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/ai-at-the-edge-disconnected)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/ai-at-the-edge-disconnected.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/ai-at-the-edge-disconnected.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Offline installer -
[Enter feedback here]
Please can you give more insights on the offline installer?
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9deb5142-8bb3-bfec-1775-bbb7f49364ed
* Version Independent ID: c1de3271-22f4-d472-f4ba-697e398c1dfa
* Content: [AI at the Edge with Azure Stack - disconnected - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/ai-at-the-edge-disconnected)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/ai-at-the-edge-disconnected.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/ai-at-the-edge-disconnected.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,offline installer please can you give more insights on the offline installer thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id bfec version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9280,24333454168.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-30 22:09:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Is there a replacement for the free Anomali Limo TAXII 2.0 feed?,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
Anomali's free Limo TAXII 2.0 feed went end of life 8/14/2022. Their site indicates there will be a new version, but no estimate for when it will be available. Is there an alternative we can use in the meantime?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7bb40dd7-0e77-0f95-8070-95978cd4a90c
* Version Independent ID: 4476618b-beb5-c8c4-ec8b-787db30643fb
* Content: [Cyber threat intelligence in Microsoft Sentinel - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/data/sentinel-threat-intelligence?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/data/sentinel-threat-intelligence.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/data/sentinel-threat-intelligence.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Is there a replacement for the free Anomali Limo TAXII 2.0 feed? -
Anomali's free Limo TAXII 2.0 feed went end of life 8/14/2022. Their site indicates there will be a new version, but no estimate for when it will be available. Is there an alternative we can use in the meantime?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7bb40dd7-0e77-0f95-8070-95978cd4a90c
* Version Independent ID: 4476618b-beb5-c8c4-ec8b-787db30643fb
* Content: [Cyber threat intelligence in Microsoft Sentinel - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/data/sentinel-threat-intelligence?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/data/sentinel-threat-intelligence.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/data/sentinel-threat-intelligence.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,is there a replacement for the free anomali limo taxii feed anomali s free limo taxii feed went end of life their site indicates there will be a new version but no estimate for when it will be available is there an alternative we can use in the meantime document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
10365,26838467217.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 21:40:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Power platform custom business process article is confusing and needs expandsion,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes
I am not sure your description matches with the graph.
And in step 4, you probably meant stored instead of processed.
4. Azure Functions runs the Graph API calls, which are processed in Azure Storage
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fe44a625-07a6-7d65-d16e-a8544c034261
* Version Independent ID: 54310bdb-1397-cd5a-688c-f8e5c042a3fb
* Content: [Custom business processes - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**
",1.0,"Power platform custom business process article is confusing and needs expandsion - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes
I am not sure your description matches with the graph.
And in step 4, you probably meant stored instead of processed.
4. Azure Functions runs the Graph API calls, which are processed in Azure Storage
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fe44a625-07a6-7d65-d16e-a8544c034261
* Version Independent ID: 54310bdb-1397-cd5a-688c-f8e5c042a3fb
* Content: [Custom business processes - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**
",1,power platform custom business process article is confusing and needs expandsion i am not sure your description matches with the graph and in step you probably meant stored instead of processed azure functions runs the graph api calls which are processed in azure storage document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
6254,14008316805.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-28 23:23:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Decision tree for which data store to use,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"I think it would be useful to have a decision tree to help people choose which data store to use (like the one in the compute section).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6a2dd11-b2f0-7821-a877-fc09af4ac967
* Version Independent ID: f7537dfd-5472-f0d2-d344-db85fd65bf71
* Content: [Choose the right data store - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Decision tree for which data store to use - I think it would be useful to have a decision tree to help people choose which data store to use (like the one in the compute section).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a6a2dd11-b2f0-7821-a877-fc09af4ac967
* Version Independent ID: f7537dfd-5472-f0d2-d344-db85fd65bf71
* Content: [Choose the right data store - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,decision tree for which data store to use i think it would be useful to have a decision tree to help people choose which data store to use like the one in the compute section document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10140,26383205925.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-12 10:14:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Request for icons: Logic Apps Standard, and connectors",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"Hi,
Please add the icons for Logic Apps Standard, such as:
- Schemas
- Maps
- Workflows
It would also be useful to have the icons for all connectors.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Request for icons: Logic Apps Standard, and connectors - Hi,
Please add the icons for Logic Apps Standard, such as:
- Schemas
- Maps
- Workflows
It would also be useful to have the icons for all connectors.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,request for icons logic apps standard and connectors hi please add the icons for logic apps standard such as schemas maps workflows it would also be useful to have the icons for all connectors document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11446,30536506997.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-19 17:46:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Do not understand sentence,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Not certain what this sentence means:
""Azure DCsv2-series VMs have built-in high-performance, all-flash ONTAP enterprise systems. ""
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: abe01137-1818-bf97-2ad1-cbb5e308f020
* Version Independent ID: c853c2cf-9456-28aa-687f-1b95c9e5ca14
* Content: [Oracle Database with Azure NetApp Files - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/file-storage/oracle-azure-netapp-files)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/file-storage/oracle-azure-netapp-files.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/file-storage/oracle-azure-netapp-files.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **deannag**",1.0,"Do not understand sentence - Not certain what this sentence means:
""Azure DCsv2-series VMs have built-in high-performance, all-flash ONTAP enterprise systems. ""
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: abe01137-1818-bf97-2ad1-cbb5e308f020
* Version Independent ID: c853c2cf-9456-28aa-687f-1b95c9e5ca14
* Content: [Oracle Database with Azure NetApp Files - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/file-storage/oracle-azure-netapp-files)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/file-storage/oracle-azure-netapp-files.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/file-storage/oracle-azure-netapp-files.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **deannag**",1,do not understand sentence not certain what this sentence means azure series vms have built in high performance all flash ontap enterprise systems document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login martinekuan microsoft alias deannag ,1
8995,23954628510.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-12 14:07:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Clarification about App Service free managed certificate with original host name preservation,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"In the **Implementation guidance for common Azure services** section we're told the recommendation is to preserve the original host name in the call between the reverse proxy and the back-end application server:
End-to-end TLS encryption is often required and is also recommended (especially for Azure Front Door) in other places in the documentation.
Recommendation in the article is to import an existing certificate or use App Service free managed certificate.
Clarification about free managed certificate is needed as according to my knowledge it is not going to work in this scenario. From the documentation regarding App Service free managed certificate there are some prerequisites which have to be met in order to generate certificate (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/configure-ssl-certificate?tabs=subdomain%2Cportal#create-a-free-managed-certificate):
For the Apex domain:
- **Must have an A record pointing to your web app's IP address.**
- Isn't supported on apps that are not publicly accessible.
- Isn't supported with root domains that are integrated with Traffic Manager.
- Must meet all the above for successful certificate issuances and renewals.
For the subdomain:
- **Must have CNAME mapped directly to .azurewebsites.net. Mapping to an intermediate CNAME value blocks certificate issuance and renewal.**
- Must meet all the above for successful certificate issuance and renewals.
In the suggested architecture A or CNAME record is mapped to the address of reverse proxy and not backend app itself, hence App Service won't be able to generate certificate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5beaff9-80fa-3c91-f5c6-81c3fda8bbb6
* Version Independent ID: c5beaff9-80fa-3c91-f5c6-81c3fda8bbb6
* Content: [Host name preservation - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/host-name-preservation)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/host-name-preservation.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/host-name-preservation.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **jelled**",1.0,"Clarification about App Service free managed certificate with original host name preservation - In the **Implementation guidance for common Azure services** section we're told the recommendation is to preserve the original host name in the call between the reverse proxy and the back-end application server:
End-to-end TLS encryption is often required and is also recommended (especially for Azure Front Door) in other places in the documentation.
Recommendation in the article is to import an existing certificate or use App Service free managed certificate.
Clarification about free managed certificate is needed as according to my knowledge it is not going to work in this scenario. From the documentation regarding App Service free managed certificate there are some prerequisites which have to be met in order to generate certificate (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/configure-ssl-certificate?tabs=subdomain%2Cportal#create-a-free-managed-certificate):
For the Apex domain:
- **Must have an A record pointing to your web app's IP address.**
- Isn't supported on apps that are not publicly accessible.
- Isn't supported with root domains that are integrated with Traffic Manager.
- Must meet all the above for successful certificate issuances and renewals.
For the subdomain:
- **Must have CNAME mapped directly to .azurewebsites.net. Mapping to an intermediate CNAME value blocks certificate issuance and renewal.**
- Must meet all the above for successful certificate issuance and renewals.
In the suggested architecture A or CNAME record is mapped to the address of reverse proxy and not backend app itself, hence App Service won't be able to generate certificate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5beaff9-80fa-3c91-f5c6-81c3fda8bbb6
* Version Independent ID: c5beaff9-80fa-3c91-f5c6-81c3fda8bbb6
* Content: [Host name preservation - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/host-name-preservation)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/host-name-preservation.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/host-name-preservation.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **jelled**",1,clarification about app service free managed certificate with original host name preservation in the implementation guidance for common azure services section we re told the recommendation is to preserve the original host name in the call between the reverse proxy and the back end application server end to end tls encryption is often required and is also recommended especially for azure front door in other places in the documentation recommendation in the article is to import an existing certificate or use app service free managed certificate clarification about free managed certificate is needed as according to my knowledge it is not going to work in this scenario from the documentation regarding app service free managed certificate there are some prerequisites which have to be met in order to generate certificate for the apex domain must have an a record pointing to your web app s ip address isn t supported on apps that are not publicly accessible isn t supported with root domains that are integrated with traffic manager must meet all the above for successful certificate issuances and renewals for the subdomain must have cname mapped directly to azurewebsites net mapping to an intermediate cname value blocks certificate issuance and renewal must meet all the above for successful certificate issuance and renewals in the suggested architecture a or cname record is mapped to the address of reverse proxy and not backend app itself hence app service won t be able to generate certificate document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login jelledruyts microsoft alias jelled ,1
11074,27964401245.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 18:09:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Replace Timeseries Insights with Azure Data Explorer in the decision tree,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 guide/subsvc,"
Microsoft has announced the retirement of Timeseries Insights. All TSI customers have been encouraged to migrate to Azure Data Explorer. Our documents and decision tree should also reflect this.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/time-series-insights/how-to-tsi-gen2-migration
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 88559925-9b9e-d9b3-ddb6-08306692c17b
* Version Independent ID: a25055cb-7cfe-28a0-1c66-06172c037128
* Content: [Data store decision tree - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Replace Timeseries Insights with Azure Data Explorer in the decision tree -
Microsoft has announced the retirement of Timeseries Insights. All TSI customers have been encouraged to migrate to Azure Data Explorer. Our documents and decision tree should also reflect this.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/time-series-insights/how-to-tsi-gen2-migration
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 88559925-9b9e-d9b3-ddb6-08306692c17b
* Version Independent ID: a25055cb-7cfe-28a0-1c66-06172c037128
* Content: [Data store decision tree - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,replace timeseries insights with azure data explorer in the decision tree microsoft has announced the retirement of timeseries insights all tsi customers have been encouraged to migrate to azure data explorer our documents and decision tree should also reflect this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dsk microsoft alias architectures ,1
10614,27146333806.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-16 20:15:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Private endpoints wording,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
""There's no added cost for App Service regional VNet Integration in a supported pricing tier of Standard or higher. But Private Endpoints for Web Apps is supported only on Elastic Premium, Premium V2, and Premium V3 plans.""
I think it supports all plans now. Is it?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5253ae20-9f16-817d-1a24-f4adae76abf4
* Version Independent ID: 5253ae20-9f16-817d-1a24-f4adae76abf4
* Content: [Improved-security access to multitenant web apps from an on-premises network - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/access-multitenant-web-app-from-on-premises?utm_source=pocket_reader)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/security/access-multitenant-web-app-from-on-premises.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/security/access-multitenant-web-app-from-on-premises.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @ansingha
* Microsoft Alias: **ansingha**",1.0,"Private endpoints wording -
""There's no added cost for App Service regional VNet Integration in a supported pricing tier of Standard or higher. But Private Endpoints for Web Apps is supported only on Elastic Premium, Premium V2, and Premium V3 plans.""
I think it supports all plans now. Is it?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5253ae20-9f16-817d-1a24-f4adae76abf4
* Version Independent ID: 5253ae20-9f16-817d-1a24-f4adae76abf4
* Content: [Improved-security access to multitenant web apps from an on-premises network - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/security/access-multitenant-web-app-from-on-premises?utm_source=pocket_reader)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/security/access-multitenant-web-app-from-on-premises.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/security/access-multitenant-web-app-from-on-premises.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @ansingha
* Microsoft Alias: **ansingha**",1,private endpoints wording there s no added cost for app service regional vnet integration in a supported pricing tier of standard or higher but private endpoints for web apps is supported only on elastic premium premium and premium plans i think it supports all plans now is it document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login ansingha microsoft alias ansingha ,1
3893,10241032252.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 22:36:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Scalability Capabilities,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Page needs to be updated to reflect that Azure SQL Data Warehouse now supports in-memory query caching as per adaptive caching.
Supports in-memory caching of data: Yes for Azure SQL Data Warehouse
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6831bf64-b00f-b234-b16e-d1bd42ebb77b
* Version Independent ID: 43bb3955-7d3a-c348-bde4-c3740e93c300
* Content: [Data warehousing in Microsoft Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/data-warehousing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/data-warehousing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/relational-data/data-warehousing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Scalability Capabilities - Page needs to be updated to reflect that Azure SQL Data Warehouse now supports in-memory query caching as per adaptive caching.
Supports in-memory caching of data: Yes for Azure SQL Data Warehouse
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6831bf64-b00f-b234-b16e-d1bd42ebb77b
* Version Independent ID: 43bb3955-7d3a-c348-bde4-c3740e93c300
* Content: [Data warehousing in Microsoft Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/data-warehousing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/data-warehousing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/relational-data/data-warehousing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,scalability capabilities page needs to be updated to reflect that azure sql data warehouse now supports in memory query caching as per adaptive caching supports in memory caching of data yes for azure sql data warehouse document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10007,25998525394.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-20 13:35:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"incorrect ""tradeoff"" example",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 well-architected/subsvc,"On page https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reliability/architect there's a phrase:
""there's a tradeoff between greater redundancy and reliability versus higher costs and complexity.""
Tradeoff is used for opposites (thus the word versus), but opposites from this example ""greater redundancy and reliability"" and ""higher costs and complexity"" are not opposites, but vice versa - ""greater redundancy and reliability"" leads to ""higher costs and complexity"". For opposites need to use ""lower costs and complexity"". So that, we have either ""greater redundancy and reliability"" (with higher cost and complexity) or we have ""lower cost and complexity"" (with less redundancy and reliability)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7045e916-4244-f7fa-c147-fb4a0ddc15f6
* Version Independent ID: 78e0c541-b257-f253-e1ca-e9ea7c8e7a76
* Content: [Architecting for resiliency and availability - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reliability/architect)
* Content Source: [docs/reliability/architect.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reliability/architect.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"incorrect ""tradeoff"" example - On page https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reliability/architect there's a phrase:
""there's a tradeoff between greater redundancy and reliability versus higher costs and complexity.""
Tradeoff is used for opposites (thus the word versus), but opposites from this example ""greater redundancy and reliability"" and ""higher costs and complexity"" are not opposites, but vice versa - ""greater redundancy and reliability"" leads to ""higher costs and complexity"". For opposites need to use ""lower costs and complexity"". So that, we have either ""greater redundancy and reliability"" (with higher cost and complexity) or we have ""lower cost and complexity"" (with less redundancy and reliability)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7045e916-4244-f7fa-c147-fb4a0ddc15f6
* Version Independent ID: 78e0c541-b257-f253-e1ca-e9ea7c8e7a76
* Content: [Architecting for resiliency and availability - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reliability/architect)
* Content Source: [docs/reliability/architect.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reliability/architect.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,incorrect tradeoff example on page there s a phrase there s a tradeoff between greater redundancy and reliability versus higher costs and complexity tradeoff is used for opposites thus the word versus but opposites from this example greater redundancy and reliability and higher costs and complexity are not opposites but vice versa greater redundancy and reliability leads to higher costs and complexity for opposites need to use lower costs and complexity so that we have either greater redundancy and reliability with higher cost and complexity or we have lower cost and complexity with less redundancy and reliability document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
11494,30748944818.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-28 17:21:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Non internet facing applications ,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"Is still true that front door is only for internet facing applications ? I mean now ( based on my understanding, will try this out ) with Azure Front Door Premium is possible to reach app services and ILBs.
Is also possible to restrict Azure Front Door access to internal network ?
If yes , should Front Door Premium be added to the decision tree or at least as a note in this documentation ?
Thanks in advance, I can send a PR out to update the diagram ( not sure with which tool ) and the doc
---
#### Dettagli del documento
⚠ *Non modificare questa sezione. È necessaria per i collegamenti relativi ai problemi tra docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Opzioni di bilanciamento del carico - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Non internet facing applications - Is still true that front door is only for internet facing applications ? I mean now ( based on my understanding, will try this out ) with Azure Front Door Premium is possible to reach app services and ILBs.
Is also possible to restrict Azure Front Door access to internal network ?
If yes , should Front Door Premium be added to the decision tree or at least as a note in this documentation ?
Thanks in advance, I can send a PR out to update the diagram ( not sure with which tool ) and the doc
---
#### Dettagli del documento
⚠ *Non modificare questa sezione. È necessaria per i collegamenti relativi ai problemi tra docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Opzioni di bilanciamento del carico - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/it-it/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,non internet facing applications is still true that front door is only for internet facing applications i mean now based on my understanding will try this out with azure front door premium is possible to reach app services and ilbs is also possible to restrict azure front door access to internal network if yes should front door premium be added to the decision tree or at least as a note in this documentation thanks in advance i can send a pr out to update the diagram not sure with which tool and the doc dettagli del documento ⚠ non modificare questa sezione è necessaria per i collegamenti relativi ai problemi tra docs microsoft com ➟ github id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
3617,9882560192.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-24 17:10:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Bounded Context, Microservice, Domain Services",architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"I am confused. Is each of these a separate microservice: Delivery, Package, Supervisor, Scheduler? based on below
""Delivery and Package are obvious candidates for microservices. The Scheduler and Supervisor coordinate the activities performed by other microservices, so it makes sense to implement these domain services as microservices.""
Furthermore, is each of these rectangles on the diagram below a separate microservice?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/images/drone-delivery.png
Why is the Shipping bounded context on the diagram below not a microservice?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/images/bounded-contexts.png
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 95a0c8e3-8abb-aa09-c746-ae94113f3c14
* Version Independent ID: 5b56b900-3c15-4392-dd73-85e496954dc7
* Content: [Identifying microservice boundaries](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Bounded Context, Microservice, Domain Services - I am confused. Is each of these a separate microservice: Delivery, Package, Supervisor, Scheduler? based on below
""Delivery and Package are obvious candidates for microservices. The Scheduler and Supervisor coordinate the activities performed by other microservices, so it makes sense to implement these domain services as microservices.""
Furthermore, is each of these rectangles on the diagram below a separate microservice?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/images/drone-delivery.png
Why is the Shipping bounded context on the diagram below not a microservice?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/images/bounded-contexts.png
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 95a0c8e3-8abb-aa09-c746-ae94113f3c14
* Version Independent ID: 5b56b900-3c15-4392-dd73-85e496954dc7
* Content: [Identifying microservice boundaries](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,bounded context microservice domain services i am confused is each of these a separate microservice delivery package supervisor scheduler based on below delivery and package are obvious candidates for microservices the scheduler and supervisor coordinate the activities performed by other microservices so it makes sense to implement these domain services as microservices furthermore is each of these rectangles on the diagram below a separate microservice why is the shipping bounded context on the diagram below not a microservice document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
7496,18052126686.0,IssuesEvent,2021-09-19 23:03:30,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Optimize Marketing with Machine Learning,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"Hi there,
I'm interested in the solution of Optimize Marketing with Machine Learning (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/optimize-marketing-with-machine-learning). It would be very helpful if you could me give more insides of this solution.
Kind regards,
Jerom
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9e13d3bf-34e7-8c29-8281-65f5a2718bf1
* Version Independent ID: 1bb21591-5afb-612f-20b6-8a1c31d721f6
* Content: [Optimize Marketing with Machine Learning - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/optimize-marketing-with-machine-learning)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/optimize-marketing-with-machine-learning.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/optimize-marketing-with-machine-learning.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @nfmoore
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Optimize Marketing with Machine Learning - Hi there,
I'm interested in the solution of Optimize Marketing with Machine Learning (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/optimize-marketing-with-machine-learning). It would be very helpful if you could me give more insides of this solution.
Kind regards,
Jerom
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9e13d3bf-34e7-8c29-8281-65f5a2718bf1
* Version Independent ID: 1bb21591-5afb-612f-20b6-8a1c31d721f6
* Content: [Optimize Marketing with Machine Learning - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/optimize-marketing-with-machine-learning)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/optimize-marketing-with-machine-learning.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/optimize-marketing-with-machine-learning.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @nfmoore
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,optimize marketing with machine learning hi there i m interested in the solution of optimize marketing with machine learning it would be very helpful if you could me give more insides of this solution kind regards jerom document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login nfmoore microsoft alias pnp ,1
9516,24733991643.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-20 20:09:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Purview to Microsoft Purview,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
[This page does not have the new update brand from ""Azure Purview to Microsoft Purview""]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5f10895e-4e1d-1cdd-2d57-32880e0cc45a
* Version Independent ID: 3518d0a5-ffd1-dfa7-6d6b-de2a9ef170d6
* Content: [Analytics end-to-end with Azure Synapse - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end?tabs=portal)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @fabragaMS
* Microsoft Alias: **fabraga**",1.0,"Azure Purview to Microsoft Purview -
[This page does not have the new update brand from ""Azure Purview to Microsoft Purview""]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5f10895e-4e1d-1cdd-2d57-32880e0cc45a
* Version Independent ID: 3518d0a5-ffd1-dfa7-6d6b-de2a9ef170d6
* Content: [Analytics end-to-end with Azure Synapse - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end?tabs=portal)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @fabragaMS
* Microsoft Alias: **fabraga**",1,azure purview to microsoft purview document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login fabragams microsoft alias fabraga ,1
7329,17483349594.0,IssuesEvent,2021-08-09 07:38:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Minor Typos,doc-bug cxp triaged architecture-center/svc design-pattern/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hi,
Minor typos in the last bullet point under the ""When to use this pattern"" section (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/materialized-view#when-to-use-this-pattern):
- ""Thefore, materialized views..."" should be ""Therefore, materialized views...""
- ""If materialized views are not appropiate..."" should be ""If materialized views are not appropriate...""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a4ffec9b-27ef-0f8c-5fcf-58347950feaf
* Version Independent ID: 8dadd327-8781-e1ef-e2b3-f75f416524e6
* Content: [Materialized View pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/materialized-view)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/materialized-view.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/materialized-view.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Minor Typos -
[Enter feedback here]
Hi,
Minor typos in the last bullet point under the ""When to use this pattern"" section (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/materialized-view#when-to-use-this-pattern):
- ""Thefore, materialized views..."" should be ""Therefore, materialized views...""
- ""If materialized views are not appropiate..."" should be ""If materialized views are not appropriate...""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a4ffec9b-27ef-0f8c-5fcf-58347950feaf
* Version Independent ID: 8dadd327-8781-e1ef-e2b3-f75f416524e6
* Content: [Materialized View pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/materialized-view)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/materialized-view.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/materialized-view.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,minor typos hi minor typos in the last bullet point under the when to use this pattern section thefore materialized views should be therefore materialized views if materialized views are not appropiate should be if materialized views are not appropriate document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9181,24171746474.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-22 19:54:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SNS is listed as SQS,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"SNS is listed as SQS. Please correct.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"SNS is listed as SQS - SNS is listed as SQS. Please correct.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,sns is listed as sqs sns is listed as sqs please correct document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
8967,23894595611.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-08 13:57:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Link is to a blog post that is really out of date.,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"In the article is a link to this old blog post, referred to here:
""For a deeper understanding of the limits of the CRUD approach, see CRUD, Only When You Can Afford It.""
The post is 17 years old and, frankly, not that well written: all text, rambling, full of half-explained examples without context - a sort of stream-of-consciousness brain dump. It would make sense informally as part of a conversation on reddit or something, but not as a clear discussion of a particular pattern / anti-pattern.
I think it might be better to include a link to a more professional-looking discussion such as Martin Fowler's: martinfowler.com/eaaDev/EventSourcing.html
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Link is to a blog post that is really out of date. - In the article is a link to this old blog post, referred to here:
""For a deeper understanding of the limits of the CRUD approach, see CRUD, Only When You Can Afford It.""
The post is 17 years old and, frankly, not that well written: all text, rambling, full of half-explained examples without context - a sort of stream-of-consciousness brain dump. It would make sense informally as part of a conversation on reddit or something, but not as a clear discussion of a particular pattern / anti-pattern.
I think it might be better to include a link to a more professional-looking discussion such as Martin Fowler's: martinfowler.com/eaaDev/EventSourcing.html
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,link is to a blog post that is really out of date in the article is a link to this old blog post referred to here for a deeper understanding of the limits of the crud approach see crud only when you can afford it the post is years old and frankly not that well written all text rambling full of half explained examples without context a sort of stream of consciousness brain dump it would make sense informally as part of a conversation on reddit or something but not as a clear discussion of a particular pattern anti pattern i think it might be better to include a link to a more professional looking discussion such as martin fowler s martinfowler com eaadev eventsourcing html document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9349,24449123813.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-06 20:49:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio Diagrams for Architecture Center,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
It would be great to have access to the Visio Diagrams for all of the Architecture Center Azure patterns.
Where can a Microsoft employee access?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6724a3b3-3c90-3f27-a51d-454819e88f37
* Version Independent ID: 0c1b3984-7fbd-70ab-98e1-a2bb7697876b
* Content: [Profisee master data management with Azure Data Factory - Azure Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/profisee-master-data-management-data-factory)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/profisee-master-data-management-data-factory.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/profisee-master-data-management-data-factory.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Visio Diagrams for Architecture Center -
It would be great to have access to the Visio Diagrams for all of the Architecture Center Azure patterns.
Where can a Microsoft employee access?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6724a3b3-3c90-3f27-a51d-454819e88f37
* Version Independent ID: 0c1b3984-7fbd-70ab-98e1-a2bb7697876b
* Content: [Profisee master data management with Azure Data Factory - Azure Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/profisee-master-data-management-data-factory)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/profisee-master-data-management-data-factory.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/profisee-master-data-management-data-factory.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio diagrams for architecture center it would be great to have access to the visio diagrams for all of the architecture center azure patterns where can a microsoft employee access document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5016,11951225169.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-03 16:30:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Issue with diagram,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug needs-art triaged,"Hi, the diagram does not appear to render correctly.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ba39518b-4b1f-f0df-e1c1-bfcc1f586dc9
* Version Independent ID: 7c0dfce9-73a6-7a64-5439-5ff07d6eb686
* Content: [Training and procedural guidance powered by mixed reality - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/training-and-procedural-guidance-powered-by-mixed-reality#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/training-and-procedural-guidance-powered-by-mixed-reality.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/training-and-procedural-guidance-powered-by-mixed-reality.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Issue with diagram - Hi, the diagram does not appear to render correctly.
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ba39518b-4b1f-f0df-e1c1-bfcc1f586dc9
* Version Independent ID: 7c0dfce9-73a6-7a64-5439-5ff07d6eb686
* Content: [Training and procedural guidance powered by mixed reality - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/training-and-procedural-guidance-powered-by-mixed-reality#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/training-and-procedural-guidance-powered-by-mixed-reality.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/training-and-procedural-guidance-powered-by-mixed-reality.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,issue with diagram hi the diagram does not appear to render correctly document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
6636,14973032043.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-28 00:07:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Additional missing icons,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"The following services' icons are missing
- Integration Service Accounts
- WVD-related services:
- Host pool
- Application group
- Workspace
- Access control (IAM)
- Private endpoint
- Subnet
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Additional missing icons - The following services' icons are missing
- Integration Service Accounts
- WVD-related services:
- Host pool
- Application group
- Workspace
- Access control (IAM)
- Private endpoint
- Subnet
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,additional missing icons the following services icons are missing integration service accounts wvd related services host pool application group workspace access control iam private endpoint subnet document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
3879,10239364490.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:03:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Slowly Changing Dimension join by SK, not by natural key",architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"According to Kimball best practices the fact table and the dimension table should join by a Surrogates key. The example shown in this page, and the use of Temporal Tables for SCD Type 2 seems to miss this point.
Wondering if I am missing something or MS has missed/ignore this point.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c337b22b-b387-5eea-9b16-656885eae759
* Version Independent ID: 6c1ad9b6-fdf4-f23a-20dc-118f262d0a8c
* Content: [Automated enterprise business intelligence (BI) - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/enterprise-bi-adf#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/enterprise-bi-adf.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/enterprise-bi-adf.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Slowly Changing Dimension join by SK, not by natural key - According to Kimball best practices the fact table and the dimension table should join by a Surrogates key. The example shown in this page, and the use of Temporal Tables for SCD Type 2 seems to miss this point.
Wondering if I am missing something or MS has missed/ignore this point.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c337b22b-b387-5eea-9b16-656885eae759
* Version Independent ID: 6c1ad9b6-fdf4-f23a-20dc-118f262d0a8c
* Content: [Automated enterprise business intelligence (BI) - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/enterprise-bi-adf#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/enterprise-bi-adf.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/enterprise-bi-adf.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,slowly changing dimension join by sk not by natural key according to kimball best practices the fact table and the dimension table should join by a surrogates key the example shown in this page and the use of temporal tables for scd type seems to miss this point wondering if i am missing something or ms has missed ignore this point document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
3660,9958254534.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-05 20:15:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AWS Systems Manager,architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"I would argue that AWS Systems Manager is a lot similar to Azure Automation. Granted it can be used to monitor compliance/remediate issues. However, it also has a large focus on automating repetitive tasks as well as patching and managing EC2 instances.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"AWS Systems Manager - I would argue that AWS Systems Manager is a lot similar to Azure Automation. Granted it can be used to monitor compliance/remediate issues. However, it also has a large focus on automating repetitive tasks as well as patching and managing EC2 instances.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,aws systems manager i would argue that aws systems manager is a lot similar to azure automation granted it can be used to monitor compliance remediate issues however it also has a large focus on automating repetitive tasks as well as patching and managing instances document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
6078,13642680373.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-25 15:53:16,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Reference to ""availability""",Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"> VMs within the same **availability** are deployed across multiple physical servers, compute racks, storage units, and network switches for redundancy.
I think this sentence was intended to say ""availability set"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8c00d25f-b981-29e3-bd64-865fda0b0d33
* Version Independent ID: 36bcc6f0-0fa4-df9c-cff5-4fdfb3460432
* Content: [Windows N-tier application on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Reference to ""availability"" - > VMs within the same **availability** are deployed across multiple physical servers, compute racks, storage units, and network switches for redundancy.
I think this sentence was intended to say ""availability set"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8c00d25f-b981-29e3-bd64-865fda0b0d33
* Version Independent ID: 36bcc6f0-0fa4-df9c-cff5-4fdfb3460432
* Content: [Windows N-tier application on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,reference to availability vms within the same availability are deployed across multiple physical servers compute racks storage units and network switches for redundancy i think this sentence was intended to say availability set document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11064,27880843353.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-21 19:15:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Pricing Estimate link does not work,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
The pricing sample does not load
Looks like link to estimate no longer works.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/calculator/?shared-estimate=b798fb70c53e4dd19fdeacea4db78276
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e4f4c7c-f268-b75b-2486-5c4418e5b24e
* Version Independent ID: 5d28faa1-20bc-1727-05ab-0b18eba1ba7c
* Content: [Data warehousing and analytics - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @alexbuckgit
* Microsoft Alias: **Alex.Buck**",1.0,"Pricing Estimate link does not work -
The pricing sample does not load
Looks like link to estimate no longer works.
https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/pricing/calculator/?shared-estimate=b798fb70c53e4dd19fdeacea4db78276
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e4f4c7c-f268-b75b-2486-5c4418e5b24e
* Version Independent ID: 5d28faa1-20bc-1727-05ab-0b18eba1ba7c
* Content: [Data warehousing and analytics - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @alexbuckgit
* Microsoft Alias: **Alex.Buck**",1,pricing estimate link does not work the pricing sample does not load looks like link to estimate no longer works document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login alexbuckgit microsoft alias alex buck ,1
9291,24363132077.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-03 13:19:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Wrong Visio Link,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"The ""Download a Visio file of this architecture."" is referencing to the wrong file.
Please also check all other Sections unter ""Architectures"" since almost all of them reference to the same one.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Wrong Visio Link - The ""Download a Visio file of this architecture."" is referencing to the wrong file.
Please also check all other Sections unter ""Architectures"" since almost all of them reference to the same one.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,wrong visio link the download a visio file of this architecture is referencing to the wrong file please also check all other sections unter architectures since almost all of them reference to the same one document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
5431,12497830929.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:11:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,your presentation is awful. totally disjointed. more confusing than helpful,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Graphic is totally confusing. what does it take to run a vm simply/. this is far too confusing. from the portal it is impossible. i expect this will cost abot $3.72 a month. for the VM anyway. now you're saying more has to be added. how much is that? all the mouse clicking is ridiculous.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 678f3299-1ff9-8a31-a434-be16f33f90ef
* Version Independent ID: 18de51b9-9bdc-da60-1e2f-383c79b08e54
* Content: [Run a Windows VM on Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"your presentation is awful. totally disjointed. more confusing than helpful - Graphic is totally confusing. what does it take to run a vm simply/. this is far too confusing. from the portal it is impossible. i expect this will cost abot $3.72 a month. for the VM anyway. now you're saying more has to be added. how much is that? all the mouse clicking is ridiculous.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 678f3299-1ff9-8a31-a434-be16f33f90ef
* Version Independent ID: 18de51b9-9bdc-da60-1e2f-383c79b08e54
* Content: [Run a Windows VM on Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/windows-vm.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,your presentation is awful totally disjointed more confusing than helpful graphic is totally confusing what does it take to run a vm simply this is far too confusing from the portal it is impossible i expect this will cost abot a month for the vm anyway now you re saying more has to be added how much is that all the mouse clicking is ridiculous document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
4897,11812987665.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-19 21:19:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,App Gateway vs Front Door in the architecture diagram,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The architecture diagram on this page shows Azure Front Door while the downloadable visio template shows Application Gateway in ""Scalable web app"" section. Now I understand both can be used, but then if we choose Application Gateway, then shouldn't it be shown in its own subnet in the visio template ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ec53963c-4c95-f6e7-90e0-d1e827df50b0
* Version Independent ID: 81cb35e8-e65d-41b7-f53d-5ddada2b6301
* Content: [Scalable web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"App Gateway vs Front Door in the architecture diagram - The architecture diagram on this page shows Azure Front Door while the downloadable visio template shows Application Gateway in ""Scalable web app"" section. Now I understand both can be used, but then if we choose Application Gateway, then shouldn't it be shown in its own subnet in the visio template ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ec53963c-4c95-f6e7-90e0-d1e827df50b0
* Version Independent ID: 81cb35e8-e65d-41b7-f53d-5ddada2b6301
* Content: [Scalable web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,app gateway vs front door in the architecture diagram the architecture diagram on this page shows azure front door while the downloadable visio template shows application gateway in scalable web app section now i understand both can be used but then if we choose application gateway then shouldn t it be shown in its own subnet in the visio template document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10965,27618429173.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-09 21:24:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add address space with peering script does not work,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Add address space with peering script does not work -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,add address space with peering script does not work document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login randycampbell microsoft alias pnp ,1
7700,18894930616.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-15 16:50:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Terraform code example for baseline AKS architecture ,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri3,"For https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#network-topology, is there a Terraform code reference for the implementation that would create all needed resources? What’s the list of subscriptions required for this implementation?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#network-topology)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Terraform code example for baseline AKS architecture - For https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#network-topology, is there a Terraform code reference for the implementation that would create all needed resources? What’s the list of subscriptions required for this implementation?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#network-topology)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,terraform code example for baseline aks architecture for is there a terraform code reference for the implementation that would create all needed resources what’s the list of subscriptions required for this implementation document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
3804,10166099985.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-07 15:08:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing Log Analytics Workspaces,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"These need to have globally unique names, see this related issue: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/35143
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing Log Analytics Workspaces - These need to have globally unique names, see this related issue: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/35143
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing log analytics workspaces these need to have globally unique names see this related issue document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
3886,10239656187.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:47:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing App service / SQL,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"Hi,
I am missing quite some resourcetypes in the Naming rules and restrictions. Especially for App service and SQL.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing App service / SQL - Hi,
I am missing quite some resourcetypes in the Naming rules and restrictions. Especially for App service and SQL.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing app service sql hi i am missing quite some resourcetypes in the naming rules and restrictions especially for app service and sql document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
6038,13541304123.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 15:42:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Why is there an additional IoT Hub in the long version of the architecture?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"In the documentation the architecture is depicted as follows:
In the linked reference architecture document (page 30)
Why does that document have a 2) an Event Hub in between the IoT Hub and the Azure Function?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/iot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Why is there an additional IoT Hub in the long version of the architecture? - In the documentation the architecture is depicted as follows:
In the linked reference architecture document (page 30)
Why does that document have a 2) an Event Hub in between the IoT Hub and the Azure Function?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/iot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,why is there an additional iot hub in the long version of the architecture in the documentation the architecture is depicted as follows in the linked reference architecture document page why does that document have a an event hub in between the iot hub and the azure function document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9850,25386981761.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-21 22:53:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Message for Keith Hill,cxp forum triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Hello Keith - I am trying to reach someone in the Azure percept and live analytics team. SiMa.ai is interested in exploring opportunities to participate in the certified hardware ecosystem. I did send a note to Moe Tanabian but haven't heard back. Perhaps his email box is quite full or he is in a different role? Would you be open to a brief conversation with us. We are an ML SoC (system on chip) inference accelerator that integrates several vital computer vision functions onto a single chip to achieve massive benefits over the Nvidia Jetson products. We are based in San Jose. How could we connect. My email is richie.singh@sima.ai and my phone is 425 922 4041.
Sincerely,
Richie Singh
richie.singh@sima.ai
425 922 4041
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2336821a-c08d-ecfa-452c-249ee243bd1a
* Version Independent ID: 1b81e61e-6879-aadb-ac48-66090550fa74
* Content: [Computer vision with Azure IoT Edge - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/iot-edge-vision/#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/iot-edge-vision/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/iot-edge-vision/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @MSKeith
* Microsoft Alias: **keith**",1.0,"Message for Keith Hill - Hello Keith - I am trying to reach someone in the Azure percept and live analytics team. SiMa.ai is interested in exploring opportunities to participate in the certified hardware ecosystem. I did send a note to Moe Tanabian but haven't heard back. Perhaps his email box is quite full or he is in a different role? Would you be open to a brief conversation with us. We are an ML SoC (system on chip) inference accelerator that integrates several vital computer vision functions onto a single chip to achieve massive benefits over the Nvidia Jetson products. We are based in San Jose. How could we connect. My email is richie.singh@sima.ai and my phone is 425 922 4041.
Sincerely,
Richie Singh
richie.singh@sima.ai
425 922 4041
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2336821a-c08d-ecfa-452c-249ee243bd1a
* Version Independent ID: 1b81e61e-6879-aadb-ac48-66090550fa74
* Content: [Computer vision with Azure IoT Edge - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/iot-edge-vision/#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/iot-edge-vision/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/iot-edge-vision/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @MSKeith
* Microsoft Alias: **keith**",1,message for keith hill hello keith i am trying to reach someone in the azure percept and live analytics team sima ai is interested in exploring opportunities to participate in the certified hardware ecosystem i did send a note to moe tanabian but haven t heard back perhaps his email box is quite full or he is in a different role would you be open to a brief conversation with us we are an ml soc system on chip inference accelerator that integrates several vital computer vision functions onto a single chip to achieve massive benefits over the nvidia jetson products we are based in san jose how could we connect my email is richie singh sima ai and my phone is sincerely richie singh richie singh sima ai document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id ecfa version independent id aadb content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login mskeith microsoft alias keith ,1
10631,27168939155.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 17:33:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Graphic and text updates requested SAP BW/4HANA in Linux on Azure,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Hi!
Arnt de Gier here, TME for Azure NetApp Files with NetApp.
I have the following suggestions for updating this article:
1. Per the attached image, please update the architecture graphic as follows:
Move the Azure Managed Disks icon up to just below the SAP HANA Database box.
2. Stretch the box containing Azure NetApp Files icon to the right so it also covers the SAP HANA Database.
3. Change the text underneath the Azure NetApp Files box from Dedicated storage subnet to **Delegated storage subnet**.
Text update:
4. In section 'SAP Central Services cluster', third sentence, replace NetApp Files with **Azure NetApp Files**.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 90286914-6020-f118-a270-e33e3
6629c22
* Version Independent ID: 3beba32d-41f6-27df-430c-cde024bc29b2
* Content: [Run SAP BW/4HANA with Linux VMs - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-bw4hana-with-linux-virtual-machines)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-bw4hana-with-linux-virtual-machines.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-bw4hana-with-linux-virtual-machines.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Graphic and text updates requested SAP BW/4HANA in Linux on Azure - Hi!
Arnt de Gier here, TME for Azure NetApp Files with NetApp.
I have the following suggestions for updating this article:
1. Per the attached image, please update the architecture graphic as follows:
Move the Azure Managed Disks icon up to just below the SAP HANA Database box.
2. Stretch the box containing Azure NetApp Files icon to the right so it also covers the SAP HANA Database.
3. Change the text underneath the Azure NetApp Files box from Dedicated storage subnet to **Delegated storage subnet**.
Text update:
4. In section 'SAP Central Services cluster', third sentence, replace NetApp Files with **Azure NetApp Files**.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 90286914-6020-f118-a270-e33e3
6629c22
* Version Independent ID: 3beba32d-41f6-27df-430c-cde024bc29b2
* Content: [Run SAP BW/4HANA with Linux VMs - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-bw4hana-with-linux-virtual-machines)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-bw4hana-with-linux-virtual-machines.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-bw4hana-with-linux-virtual-machines.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,graphic and text updates requested sap bw in linux on azure hi arnt de gier here tme for azure netapp files with netapp i have the following suggestions for updating this article per the attached image please update the architecture graphic as follows move the azure managed disks icon up to just below the sap hana database box stretch the box containing azure netapp files icon to the right so it also covers the sap hana database change the text underneath the azure netapp files box from dedicated storage subnet to delegated storage subnet text update in section sap central services cluster third sentence replace netapp files with azure netapp files document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
5449,12498343073.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 18:06:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The Architecture Diagram is not visible properly ,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
As the background is black, the architecture diagram is not visible.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fcaeba82-a634-d73a-77fd-a07258be2c17
* Version Independent ID: 4ba78d8a-60c9-9df8-1d2c-0a375a094acb
* Content: [DevSecOps in Azure - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-azure.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-azure.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **asegala**",1.0,"The Architecture Diagram is not visible properly -
As the background is black, the architecture diagram is not visible.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fcaeba82-a634-d73a-77fd-a07258be2c17
* Version Independent ID: 4ba78d8a-60c9-9df8-1d2c-0a375a094acb
* Content: [DevSecOps in Azure - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-azure.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-azure.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **asegala**",1,the architecture diagram is not visible properly as the background is black the architecture diagram is not visible document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias asegala ,1
9726,25106454416.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 16:58:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Update Note in ASR section about PPG Support,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
Says ASR doesn't support PPG when the ASR support matrix states that it does.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/site-recovery/azure-to-azure-support-matrix
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1fff09dc-014d-d685-881e-dc7d1ef353ff
* Version Independent ID: ca3d7830-d394-d280-dd35-19749ee53f6b
* Content: [Run SAP HANA for Linux virtual machines in a scale-up architecture on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-hana-for-linux-virtual-machines#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-hana-for-linux-virtual-machines.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-hana-for-linux-virtual-machines.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @Maggsl
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Update Note in ASR section about PPG Support -
[Enter feedback here]
Says ASR doesn't support PPG when the ASR support matrix states that it does.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/site-recovery/azure-to-azure-support-matrix
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1fff09dc-014d-d685-881e-dc7d1ef353ff
* Version Independent ID: ca3d7830-d394-d280-dd35-19749ee53f6b
* Content: [Run SAP HANA for Linux virtual machines in a scale-up architecture on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-hana-for-linux-virtual-machines#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-hana-for-linux-virtual-machines.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/run-sap-hana-for-linux-virtual-machines.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @Maggsl
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,update note in asr section about ppg support says asr doesn t support ppg when the asr support matrix states that it does document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login maggsl microsoft alias pnp ,1
4494,11221923225.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-07 18:58:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Services for Management Service Discovery,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Is there Azure Services available for Management Service Discovery mentioned here?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 78a7e7bd-23f3-a39f-9015-b77f14bb43e5
* Version Independent ID: 0ac34e7e-315f-2452-bf0a-74e9b1068c38
* Content: [Microservices architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Services for Management Service Discovery - Is there Azure Services available for Management Service Discovery mentioned here?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 78a7e7bd-23f3-a39f-9015-b77f14bb43e5
* Version Independent ID: 0ac34e7e-315f-2452-bf0a-74e9b1068c38
* Content: [Microservices architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure services for management service discovery is there azure services available for management service discovery mentioned here document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
7417,17766369811.0,IssuesEvent,2021-08-30 08:03:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Feedback on Azure AD and on-premise AD DS integration,cxp product-feedback kudos triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc,"The architecture diagram is probably the most interesting resource at the point of setting up a new AD from scratch. If you require on-premise control, assume the Azure AD to be an add-on rather than the core of your directory! Thankfully, hybrid configurations are blessed and will remain supported for some time.
Note that all components on the Azure cloud are brought under a SINGLE TENANT. This means;
- =single organization
- =single ""on-premise AD domain"", the onmicrosoft.com one
- =multiple routable web domains, but no re-use possible between different tenants
- =single container of Microsoft 365 data (SharePoint, Exchange, Teams/Skype)
- =Microsoft 365 and Azure cloud resources are isolated from other Azure tenants
All your different on-premise AD DS sites and domains get flattened while syncing to Azure AD, so don't make a too complex AD logical structure if you intend to move fully cloud-managed!
Don't go fully managed cloud (yet) if you require Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM).
EDIT; OOPS, sorry for the ping. 🙏
It was my intention to leave a comment for the next reader(s). Not to provide feedback on the content. I figured this was a fully automated way of processing comments for the docs.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9dbf62e6-49ab-a499-f82e-e0ade93ce2e2
* Version Independent ID: 08bbadc2-c2f9-1c43-b541-e5e2554931fc
* Content: [Multiple forests with AD DS and Azure AD - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @nehalineogi
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Feedback on Azure AD and on-premise AD DS integration - The architecture diagram is probably the most interesting resource at the point of setting up a new AD from scratch. If you require on-premise control, assume the Azure AD to be an add-on rather than the core of your directory! Thankfully, hybrid configurations are blessed and will remain supported for some time.
Note that all components on the Azure cloud are brought under a SINGLE TENANT. This means;
- =single organization
- =single ""on-premise AD domain"", the onmicrosoft.com one
- =multiple routable web domains, but no re-use possible between different tenants
- =single container of Microsoft 365 data (SharePoint, Exchange, Teams/Skype)
- =Microsoft 365 and Azure cloud resources are isolated from other Azure tenants
All your different on-premise AD DS sites and domains get flattened while syncing to Azure AD, so don't make a too complex AD logical structure if you intend to move fully cloud-managed!
Don't go fully managed cloud (yet) if you require Microsoft Endpoint Configuration Manager (SCCM).
EDIT; OOPS, sorry for the ping. 🙏
It was my intention to leave a comment for the next reader(s). Not to provide feedback on the content. I figured this was a fully automated way of processing comments for the docs.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9dbf62e6-49ab-a499-f82e-e0ade93ce2e2
* Version Independent ID: 08bbadc2-c2f9-1c43-b541-e5e2554931fc
* Content: [Multiple forests with AD DS and Azure AD - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @nehalineogi
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,feedback on azure ad and on premise ad ds integration the architecture diagram is probably the most interesting resource at the point of setting up a new ad from scratch if you require on premise control assume the azure ad to be an add on rather than the core of your directory thankfully hybrid configurations are blessed and will remain supported for some time note that all components on the azure cloud are brought under a single tenant this means single organization single on premise ad domain the onmicrosoft com one multiple routable web domains but no re use possible between different tenants single container of microsoft data sharepoint exchange teams skype microsoft and azure cloud resources are isolated from other azure tenants all your different on premise ad ds sites and domains get flattened while syncing to azure ad so don t make a too complex ad logical structure if you intend to move fully cloud managed don t go fully managed cloud yet if you require microsoft endpoint configuration manager sccm edit oops sorry for the ping 🙏 it was my intention to leave a comment for the next reader s not to provide feedback on the content i figured this was a fully automated way of processing comments for the docs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login nehalineogi microsoft alias pnp ,1
5764,13132725539.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-06 19:28:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Consider adding Pulumi to infrastructure deployment,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged well-architected/subsvc,"[Pulumi](https://www.pulumi.com) is another tool for infrastructure deployment. It is Infrastructure as Software rather than IaC, with a hybrid imperative/declarative style, where you can deploy infrastructure using many programming languages.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5490ef64-9b6d-59be-1e9b-a2b2d10388b2
* Version Independent ID: 4e37976c-47f3-1481-b312-e7be38f93e07
* Content: [Infrastructure Deployment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/iac)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/iac.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/iac.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @Jose-Moreno
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Consider adding Pulumi to infrastructure deployment - [Pulumi](https://www.pulumi.com) is another tool for infrastructure deployment. It is Infrastructure as Software rather than IaC, with a hybrid imperative/declarative style, where you can deploy infrastructure using many programming languages.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5490ef64-9b6d-59be-1e9b-a2b2d10388b2
* Version Independent ID: 4e37976c-47f3-1481-b312-e7be38f93e07
* Content: [Infrastructure Deployment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/iac)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/iac.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/iac.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @Jose-Moreno
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,consider adding pulumi to infrastructure deployment is another tool for infrastructure deployment it is infrastructure as software rather than iac with a hybrid imperative declarative style where you can deploy infrastructure using many programming languages document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login jose moreno microsoft alias pnp ,1
5562,12701890334.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 19:03:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Shouldn't Jumpbox in the diagram be replaced with Azure Bastion?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
This diagram pre dates the release of Bastion and I think it should replace jumpboxes in the diagram since thats its purpose.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: be033e7f-d78f-f63f-c9b5-f08130315704
* Version Independent ID: d66f5650-fffb-79a6-ee59-40eaad06cd4f
* Content: [Multi-region N-tier application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Shouldn't Jumpbox in the diagram be replaced with Azure Bastion? -
[Enter feedback here]
This diagram pre dates the release of Bastion and I think it should replace jumpboxes in the diagram since thats its purpose.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: be033e7f-d78f-f63f-c9b5-f08130315704
* Version Independent ID: d66f5650-fffb-79a6-ee59-40eaad06cd4f
* Content: [Multi-region N-tier application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,shouldn t jumpbox in the diagram be replaced with azure bastion this diagram pre dates the release of bastion and i think it should replace jumpboxes in the diagram since thats its purpose document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fffb content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
4090,10564931430.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-05 06:49:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,ProductsCommandHandler implementation,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Hello,
ProductsCommandHandler implements more than one ICommandHandler<T>, that breaks ""Single responsibility rule"" from SOLID.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [Command and Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"ProductsCommandHandler implementation - Hello,
ProductsCommandHandler implements more than one ICommandHandler<T>, that breaks ""Single responsibility rule"" from SOLID.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [Command and Query Responsibility Segregation (CQRS) pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,productscommandhandler implementation hello productscommandhandler implements more than one icommandhandler lt t gt that breaks single responsibility rule from solid document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10709,27316287456.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-24 15:57:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,BlobRequestsOptions - some example involving Blobs would be good - I believe (and hope I'm wrong) that BlobRequestOptions is not actually available - or at least I can't find how to use this,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 best-practice/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Azure service retry guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"BlobRequestsOptions - some example involving Blobs would be good - I believe (and hope I'm wrong) that BlobRequestOptions is not actually available - or at least I can't find how to use this -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Azure service retry guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,blobrequestsoptions some example involving blobs would be good i believe and hope i m wrong that blobrequestoptions is not actually available or at least i can t find how to use this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9942,25762240548.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-08 21:37:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can't download all the content when clicked on 'Download PDF' ,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri3,"Hi, Team.
Can't download all the content when clicked on 'Download PDF', mostly all white-pages are download from 'Internet of Things', below is the image for your reference.
Thank you.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 94adfdf4-b37e-e66c-b20e-6d59a2777dff
* Version Independent ID: 65fd7e49-611f-f2d8-f794-27e37020f264
* Content: [IoT solutions conceptual overview - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot/introduction-to-solutions)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/iot/introduction-to-solutions.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/iot/introduction-to-solutions.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @wamachine
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can't download all the content when clicked on 'Download PDF' - Hi, Team.
Can't download all the content when clicked on 'Download PDF', mostly all white-pages are download from 'Internet of Things', below is the image for your reference.
Thank you.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 94adfdf4-b37e-e66c-b20e-6d59a2777dff
* Version Independent ID: 65fd7e49-611f-f2d8-f794-27e37020f264
* Content: [IoT solutions conceptual overview - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot/introduction-to-solutions)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/iot/introduction-to-solutions.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/iot/introduction-to-solutions.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @wamachine
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can t download all the content when clicked on download pdf hi team can t download all the content when clicked on download pdf mostly all white pages are download from internet of things below is the image for your reference thank you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login wamachine microsoft alias pnp ,1
4992,11942132012.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 19:42:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Characteristics of SOA,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Will it be better to list characteristics of SOA here too as a comparsion?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 78a7e7bd-23f3-a39f-9015-b77f14bb43e5
* Version Independent ID: 0ac34e7e-315f-2452-bf0a-74e9b1068c38
* Content: [Microservices architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Characteristics of SOA - Will it be better to list characteristics of SOA here too as a comparsion?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 78a7e7bd-23f3-a39f-9015-b77f14bb43e5
* Version Independent ID: 0ac34e7e-315f-2452-bf0a-74e9b1068c38
* Content: [Microservices architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/microservices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,characteristics of soa will it be better to list characteristics of soa here too as a comparsion document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
3882,10239394343.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:08:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Provide guidance for generating certificate data for other platforms,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Hi,
It would be good to have guidance on how to generate certificate data for other platforms such as MacOS and Linux [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/key-vault#set-up-a-client-certificate).
Also, it would be nice to explain this script step by step if you want community to generate guidance for these platforms. I don't know, for example, what is required on each field of the output JSON.
Add:
I tested using PowerShell Core on MacOs and it seems not to have all the methods from PSPKI Module. If so, it would make simpler just to add an instruction to use PowerShell core.
Thanks
Ricardo S M Serradas
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e5df2491-1abe-0211-efbf-c1fb384862e9
* Version Independent ID: f7f0d2cf-3f4f-44dc-54aa-cd59221264d2
* Content: [Use Key Vault to protect application secrets](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/key-vault#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/key-vault.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/key-vault.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Provide guidance for generating certificate data for other platforms - Hi,
It would be good to have guidance on how to generate certificate data for other platforms such as MacOS and Linux [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/key-vault#set-up-a-client-certificate).
Also, it would be nice to explain this script step by step if you want community to generate guidance for these platforms. I don't know, for example, what is required on each field of the output JSON.
Add:
I tested using PowerShell Core on MacOs and it seems not to have all the methods from PSPKI Module. If so, it would make simpler just to add an instruction to use PowerShell core.
Thanks
Ricardo S M Serradas
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e5df2491-1abe-0211-efbf-c1fb384862e9
* Version Independent ID: f7f0d2cf-3f4f-44dc-54aa-cd59221264d2
* Content: [Use Key Vault to protect application secrets](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/key-vault#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/key-vault.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/key-vault.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,provide guidance for generating certificate data for other platforms hi it would be good to have guidance on how to generate certificate data for other platforms such as macos and linux also it would be nice to explain this script step by step if you want community to generate guidance for these platforms i don t know for example what is required on each field of the output json add i tested using powershell core on macos and it seems not to have all the methods from pspki module if so it would make simpler just to add an instruction to use powershell core thanks ricardo s m serradas document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id efbf version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9933,25739188540.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-08 04:14:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Article has no date :/,doc-bug cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Article has no date :/ -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,article has no date document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
4594,11404104266.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-31 09:03:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,DMZ Between Azure and Internet,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"There used to be a 2nd version of this that showed DMZ between Azure and Internet and Azure and On-premise, it would be good to see that design back and updated
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 74bb4b25-ebe2-264d-047d-3f651c52a9c5
* Version Independent ID: aed6ebef-6157-9608-3f85-0807c7fdf61d
* Content: [Implement a secure hybrid network architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"DMZ Between Azure and Internet - There used to be a 2nd version of this that showed DMZ between Azure and Internet and Azure and On-premise, it would be good to see that design back and updated
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 74bb4b25-ebe2-264d-047d-3f651c52a9c5
* Version Independent ID: aed6ebef-6157-9608-3f85-0807c7fdf61d
* Content: [Implement a secure hybrid network architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,dmz between azure and internet there used to be a version of this that showed dmz between azure and internet and azure and on premise it would be good to see that design back and updated document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10249,26598836807.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-23 14:25:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Scalable web and mobile applications using Azure Database for MySQL - Require additional details,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"Dear Team,
I was reviewing the document describing Architecture for 'Scalable web and mobile applications using Azure Database for MySQL'
Could you please expand the article to provide more details on:
1. Implementation details
2. Brief description of the components
3. Code examples
Thanking you in advance.
Edited: Added doc metadata
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7b201901-4bec-64d6-994c-2c1522437c39
* Version Independent ID: dba7a5e1-388f-cadf-2f60-bf276986f679
* Content: [Scalable web and mobile applications using Azure Database for MySQL - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-and-mobile-applications-using-azure-database-for-mysql)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-and-mobile-applications-using-azure-database-for-mysql.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-and-mobile-applications-using-azure-database-for-mysql.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Scalable web and mobile applications using Azure Database for MySQL - Require additional details - Dear Team,
I was reviewing the document describing Architecture for 'Scalable web and mobile applications using Azure Database for MySQL'
Could you please expand the article to provide more details on:
1. Implementation details
2. Brief description of the components
3. Code examples
Thanking you in advance.
Edited: Added doc metadata
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7b201901-4bec-64d6-994c-2c1522437c39
* Version Independent ID: dba7a5e1-388f-cadf-2f60-bf276986f679
* Content: [Scalable web and mobile applications using Azure Database for MySQL - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-and-mobile-applications-using-azure-database-for-mysql)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-and-mobile-applications-using-azure-database-for-mysql.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-and-mobile-applications-using-azure-database-for-mysql.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,scalable web and mobile applications using azure database for mysql require additional details dear team i was reviewing the document describing architecture for scalable web and mobile applications using azure database for mysql could you please expand the article to provide more details on implementation details brief description of the components code examples thanking you in advance edited added doc metadata document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id cadf content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4996,11942231425.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 19:54:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Big data processing - Azure Databricks,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"
Hi,
I observed that 'Azure Databricks' equivalent service in AWS is mentioned as 'EMR'.
Nonetheless, I urge its 'AWS Glue' which is appropriate service.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Big data processing - Azure Databricks -
Hi,
I observed that 'Azure Databricks' equivalent service in AWS is mentioned as 'EMR'.
Nonetheless, I urge its 'AWS Glue' which is appropriate service.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,big data processing azure databricks hi i observed that azure databricks equivalent service in aws is mentioned as emr nonetheless i urge its aws glue which is appropriate service document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
9006,23962211616.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-12 20:14:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""Azure Cosmos DB SQL API"" is listed as a reference for section ""Document Databases""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"You may want to reconsider and link to a document-oriented API instead.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e40cb85c-ee53-7b49-0622-bed8ebedea81
* Version Independent ID: 896e0838-dfd1-c442-414d-ad9ea6dc8f7d
* Content: [Understand data store models - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview#keyvalue-stores)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"""Azure Cosmos DB SQL API"" is listed as a reference for section ""Document Databases"" - You may want to reconsider and link to a document-oriented API instead.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e40cb85c-ee53-7b49-0622-bed8ebedea81
* Version Independent ID: 896e0838-dfd1-c442-414d-ad9ea6dc8f7d
* Content: [Understand data store models - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview#keyvalue-stores)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, azure cosmos db sql api is listed as a reference for section document databases you may want to reconsider and link to a document oriented api instead document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dsk microsoft alias pnp ,1
3618,9882571931.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-24 17:12:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,API communication vs in process communication ,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Why do Scheduler Service and Drone Service communicate via API?
Are they located at different microservices?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/design/api-design#mapping-rest-to-ddd-patterns
I thought both belong to Shipping bounded context (Shipping microservice).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/model/domain-analysis#define-bounded-contexts
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 21ac798d-5822-eaa5-6e51-3a8573022d69
* Version Independent ID: 80f47a71-b119-0c0a-7c21-e7d3d16358ec
* Content: [API design](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/design/api-design#mapping-rest-to-ddd-patterns)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/design/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"API communication vs in process communication - Why do Scheduler Service and Drone Service communicate via API?
Are they located at different microservices?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/design/api-design#mapping-rest-to-ddd-patterns
I thought both belong to Shipping bounded context (Shipping microservice).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/model/domain-analysis#define-bounded-contexts
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 21ac798d-5822-eaa5-6e51-3a8573022d69
* Version Independent ID: 80f47a71-b119-0c0a-7c21-e7d3d16358ec
* Content: [API design](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/design/api-design#mapping-rest-to-ddd-patterns)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/design/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,api communication vs in process communication why do scheduler service and drone service communicate via api are they located at different microservices i thought both belong to shipping bounded context shipping microservice document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10630,27168883109.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 17:30:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure function in image is named as Azure Stack,needs-art doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"At point #6, the Azure function is named as Azure Stack. Can you rename to Azure function?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aff2e7d6-9d81-3745-1e2e-c4ce9d9565ca
* Version Independent ID: d9b29d19-4325-e4ff-b15b-51dace1c11af
* Content: [Tier applications and data for analytics - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/tiered-data-for-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/tiered-data-for-analytics.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/tiered-data-for-analytics.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure function in image is named as Azure Stack - At point #6, the Azure function is named as Azure Stack. Can you rename to Azure function?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aff2e7d6-9d81-3745-1e2e-c4ce9d9565ca
* Version Independent ID: d9b29d19-4325-e4ff-b15b-51dace1c11af
* Content: [Tier applications and data for analytics - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/tiered-data-for-analytics)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/tiered-data-for-analytics.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/tiered-data-for-analytics.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure function in image is named as azure stack at point the azure function is named as azure stack can you rename to azure function document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11629,31836589649.0,IssuesEvent,2023-09-14 13:52:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Sandbox,architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 85c75c06-7903-2f80-b5f5-11d12e258623
* Version Independent ID: 85c75c06-7903-2f80-b5f5-11d12e258623
* Content: [Azure Sandbox - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/azure-sandbox/azure-sandbox)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/azure-sandbox/azure-sandbox.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/azure-sandbox/azure-sandbox.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doherty100
* Microsoft Alias: **rdoherty**",1.0,"Azure Sandbox -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 85c75c06-7903-2f80-b5f5-11d12e258623
* Version Independent ID: 85c75c06-7903-2f80-b5f5-11d12e258623
* Content: [Azure Sandbox - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/azure-sandbox/azure-sandbox)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/azure-sandbox/azure-sandbox.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/azure-sandbox/azure-sandbox.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doherty100
* Microsoft Alias: **rdoherty**",1,azure sandbox document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias rdoherty ,1
9671,25017738770.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:27:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""Secrets"" section still erroneously points to AAD Pod Identity",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"The ""Secrets management"" section still points to AAD Pod Identity.
Microsoft already does not recommend using this as it's being replaced by Azure AD Workload Identity :
https://azure.github.io/azure-workload-identity/docs/
The document should reflect that.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on AKS - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"""Secrets"" section still erroneously points to AAD Pod Identity - The ""Secrets management"" section still points to AAD Pod Identity.
Microsoft already does not recommend using this as it's being replaced by Azure AD Workload Identity :
https://azure.github.io/azure-workload-identity/docs/
The document should reflect that.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on AKS - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-microservices/aks-microservices.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, secrets section still erroneously points to aad pod identity the secrets management section still points to aad pod identity microsoft already does not recommend using this as it s being replaced by azure ad workload identity the document should reflect that document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
5554,12699793867.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 15:21:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing code example,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
Should include a sample code example
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 608c01ec-d21f-7bdf-a700-7288222ad27c
* Version Independent ID: 94920b97-adc0-3899-f8bd-aff821f3435b
* Content: [Cross-platform Chat - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/cross-platform-chat)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/cross-platform-chat.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/cross-platform-chat.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing code example -
Should include a sample code example
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 608c01ec-d21f-7bdf-a700-7288222ad27c
* Version Independent ID: 94920b97-adc0-3899-f8bd-aff821f3435b
* Content: [Cross-platform Chat - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/cross-platform-chat)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/cross-platform-chat.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/cross-platform-chat.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing code example should include a sample code example document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
4168,10631663260.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-15 08:50:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The visio should show the SPA app also serverless,Pri3 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Would it be possible to change the visio diagram here - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app so that the SPA web app is also depicted as Serverless. That way the end to end architecture would be Serverless and Azure native.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 524d1f97-ce37-f9ac-cf05-d33665eb34df
* Version Independent ID: fe4cc63f-a4b1-c30e-f39f-f4c3de1c57be
* Content: [Serverless web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"The visio should show the SPA app also serverless - Would it be possible to change the visio diagram here - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app so that the SPA web app is also depicted as Serverless. That way the end to end architecture would be Serverless and Azure native.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 524d1f97-ce37-f9ac-cf05-d33665eb34df
* Version Independent ID: fe4cc63f-a4b1-c30e-f39f-f4c3de1c57be
* Content: [Serverless web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,the visio should show the spa app also serverless would it be possible to change the visio diagram here so that the spa web app is also depicted as serverless that way the end to end architecture would be serverless and azure native document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
3952,10337945052.0,IssuesEvent,2019-09-03 15:49:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Your chart is misleading - with Front Door TLS 1.0 and 1.1 cannot be disabled,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"So the only option is to use Traffic Manager. And disabling TLS 1.0 and 1.1 is PCI requirement. So for serious purposes Front Door is useless.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @sharad4u
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Your chart is misleading - with Front Door TLS 1.0 and 1.1 cannot be disabled - So the only option is to use Traffic Manager. And disabling TLS 1.0 and 1.1 is PCI requirement. So for serious purposes Front Door is useless.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @sharad4u
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,your chart is misleading with front door tls and cannot be disabled so the only option is to use traffic manager and disabling tls and is pci requirement so for serious purposes front door is useless document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
7770,19193288078.0,IssuesEvent,2021-12-06 05:17:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Graphic and text updates requested for SAP deployment on Oracle DB,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Hi!
Arnt de Gier here, TME for Azure NetApp Files with NetApp.
I have the following suggestions for updating this article:
1. As per attached updated graphic, please add Azure NetApp Files icons in the boxes Oracle Database, SAP central server cluster and in the bottom box named Azure NetApp Files.
2. Add a box underneath the three pillars marked **Delegated storage subnet** containing the Azure NetApp Files icon to designate the feasibility of using Azure NetApp Files in this architecture.
3. In section 'Components', add: **Storage. Azure Premium managed disks or Azure NetApp Files (for Oracle 19C) provide the recommended storage for the SAP executables and the Oracle database.**
4. Update text 'Avoiding these outcomes requires an SAP infrastructure that is highly available and resilient when failures occur.' to **Avoiding these outcomes requires an SAP infrastructure that is highly available and resilient to failures.**
5. Update text 'Building a highly available SAP environment requires eliminating single points of failures in your system architecture and processes.' to **Building a highly available SAP environment requires eliminating single points of failure in your system architecture and processes.**
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e700b9a2-8b1d-5d55-95ec-1bb123d2586a
* Version Independent ID: 7f4b8f89-a777-b03b-e0af-d3d890745088
* Content: [SAP deployment on Azure using an Oracle DB - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-production)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-production.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-production.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @DharmeshBhagat
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Graphic and text updates requested for SAP deployment on Oracle DB - Hi!
Arnt de Gier here, TME for Azure NetApp Files with NetApp.
I have the following suggestions for updating this article:
1. As per attached updated graphic, please add Azure NetApp Files icons in the boxes Oracle Database, SAP central server cluster and in the bottom box named Azure NetApp Files.
2. Add a box underneath the three pillars marked **Delegated storage subnet** containing the Azure NetApp Files icon to designate the feasibility of using Azure NetApp Files in this architecture.
3. In section 'Components', add: **Storage. Azure Premium managed disks or Azure NetApp Files (for Oracle 19C) provide the recommended storage for the SAP executables and the Oracle database.**
4. Update text 'Avoiding these outcomes requires an SAP infrastructure that is highly available and resilient when failures occur.' to **Avoiding these outcomes requires an SAP infrastructure that is highly available and resilient to failures.**
5. Update text 'Building a highly available SAP environment requires eliminating single points of failures in your system architecture and processes.' to **Building a highly available SAP environment requires eliminating single points of failure in your system architecture and processes.**
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e700b9a2-8b1d-5d55-95ec-1bb123d2586a
* Version Independent ID: 7f4b8f89-a777-b03b-e0af-d3d890745088
* Content: [SAP deployment on Azure using an Oracle DB - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-production)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-production.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-production.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @DharmeshBhagat
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,graphic and text updates requested for sap deployment on oracle db hi arnt de gier here tme for azure netapp files with netapp i have the following suggestions for updating this article as per attached updated graphic please add azure netapp files icons in the boxes oracle database sap central server cluster and in the bottom box named azure netapp files add a box underneath the three pillars marked delegated storage subnet containing the azure netapp files icon to designate the feasibility of using azure netapp files in this architecture in section components add storage azure premium managed disks or azure netapp files for oracle provide the recommended storage for the sap executables and the oracle database update text avoiding these outcomes requires an sap infrastructure that is highly available and resilient when failures occur to avoiding these outcomes requires an sap infrastructure that is highly available and resilient to failures update text building a highly available sap environment requires eliminating single points of failures in your system architecture and processes to building a highly available sap environment requires eliminating single points of failure in your system architecture and processes document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login dharmeshbhagat microsoft alias pnp ,1
9088,24036750652.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 19:57:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Expand Solution,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
I would like to see expand this article with more information (implementation details, pricing guidance, code examples, etc)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8cfcc112-0a30-557c-bf69-738c45b325d8
* Version Independent ID: 9385c916-ec7c-2f12-390b-80d136a16cb7
* Content: [Dynamics Business Central as a Service on Azure - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/business-central#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/business-central.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/business-central.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @altotovi
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Expand Solution -
[Enter feedback here]
I would like to see expand this article with more information (implementation details, pricing guidance, code examples, etc)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8cfcc112-0a30-557c-bf69-738c45b325d8
* Version Independent ID: 9385c916-ec7c-2f12-390b-80d136a16cb7
* Content: [Dynamics Business Central as a Service on Azure - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/business-central#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/business-central.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/business-central.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @altotovi
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,expand solution i would like to see expand this article with more information implementation details pricing guidance code examples etc document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login altotovi microsoft alias pnp ,1
5443,12498168403.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:48:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Suggestion,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Hello! This architecture looks strange. The search service should be between Cosmos Db and the web portal. Tks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ddae0f8b-245b-751d-8960-dfd0d1f62997
* Version Independent ID: c2e88fc0-e750-9eae-b309-bc08c61ae3cf
* Content: [Retail and e-commerce using Cosmos DB - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-e-commerce-using-cosmos-db)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-e-commerce-using-cosmos-db.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-e-commerce-using-cosmos-db.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Suggestion - Hello! This architecture looks strange. The search service should be between Cosmos Db and the web portal. Tks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ddae0f8b-245b-751d-8960-dfd0d1f62997
* Version Independent ID: c2e88fc0-e750-9eae-b309-bc08c61ae3cf
* Content: [Retail and e-commerce using Cosmos DB - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-e-commerce-using-cosmos-db)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-e-commerce-using-cosmos-db.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-e-commerce-using-cosmos-db.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,suggestion hello this architecture looks strange the search service should be between cosmos db and the web portal tks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
3697,10014399588.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-15 17:25:30,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Deployment,architecture-center/svc cxp product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"In the Architecture section, this sentence ""The application is deployed to each region"", does it mean manually or automatically? If a web app changes a lot, do we have to apply the updates on all web apps in other regions? Or are they synced automatically?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Deployment - In the Architecture section, this sentence ""The application is deployed to each region"", does it mean manually or automatically? If a web app changes a lot, do we have to apply the updates on all web apps in other regions? Or are they synced automatically?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,deployment in the architecture section this sentence the application is deployed to each region does it mean manually or automatically if a web app changes a lot do we have to apply the updates on all web apps in other regions or are they synced automatically document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6431,14562478570.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-17 00:11:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,NetApp Files on Azure,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"can you please update this section here for Azure NetApp Files Currently, up to 1000 IP connections per active VNet are possible. This also includes VNET Peerings as well. To VNET + Peered VNETs (1000 IP's in total)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"NetApp Files on Azure - can you please update this section here for Azure NetApp Files Currently, up to 1000 IP connections per active VNet are possible. This also includes VNET Peerings as well. To VNET + Peered VNETs (1000 IP's in total)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,netapp files on azure can you please update this section here for azure netapp files currently up to ip connections per active vnet are possible this also includes vnet peerings as well to vnet peered vnets ip s in total document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afaf content content source service architecture center github login christiaanbrinkhoff microsoft alias pnp ,1
3342,9527651821.0,IssuesEvent,2019-04-29 05:22:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Is CQRS an architecture style, or just an architecture pattern?",architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp product-question triaged,"This page mentions CQRS is an architecture style. But [another page](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/microservices-architecture/microservice-ddd-cqrs-patterns/eshoponcontainers-cqrs-ddd-microservice) says it is not an arch style, just a pattern.
I agree that is just a pattern. My understanding CQRS is normally applied within several microservices, and CQRS normally doesn't decide the architecture of a system.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e46426ef-bb0f-b085-a645-7e3e6c05752d
* Version Independent ID: 13b0c53a-cd01-9894-f34f-8d223c8e5b2b
* Content: [CQRS architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/cqrs)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/cqrs.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/live/docs/guide/architecture-styles/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Is CQRS an architecture style, or just an architecture pattern? - This page mentions CQRS is an architecture style. But [another page](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/standard/microservices-architecture/microservice-ddd-cqrs-patterns/eshoponcontainers-cqrs-ddd-microservice) says it is not an arch style, just a pattern.
I agree that is just a pattern. My understanding CQRS is normally applied within several microservices, and CQRS normally doesn't decide the architecture of a system.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e46426ef-bb0f-b085-a645-7e3e6c05752d
* Version Independent ID: 13b0c53a-cd01-9894-f34f-8d223c8e5b2b
* Content: [CQRS architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/cqrs)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/cqrs.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/live/docs/guide/architecture-styles/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,is cqrs an architecture style or just an architecture pattern this page mentions cqrs is an architecture style but says it is not an arch style just a pattern i agree that is just a pattern my understanding cqrs is normally applied within several microservices and cqrs normally doesn t decide the architecture of a system document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5721,13050075557.0,IssuesEvent,2020-07-29 14:58:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""Azure Well-Architected Framework"" link is broken",Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
The link referenced in the first paragraph is broken https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/index.md
```
In this reference architecture, we’ll build a baseline infrastructure that deploys an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
cluster with focus on security. This article includes recommendations for networking, security, identity,
management, and monitoring of the cluster based on an organization’s business requirements and follows the
Azure Well-Architected Framework.
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"""Azure Well-Architected Framework"" link is broken -
The link referenced in the first paragraph is broken https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/index.md
```
In this reference architecture, we’ll build a baseline infrastructure that deploys an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
cluster with focus on security. This article includes recommendations for networking, security, identity,
management, and monitoring of the cluster based on an organization’s business requirements and follows the
Azure Well-Architected Framework.
```
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, azure well architected framework link is broken the link referenced in the first paragraph is broken in this reference architecture we’ll build a baseline infrastructure that deploys an azure kubernetes service aks cluster with focus on security this article includes recommendations for networking security identity management and monitoring of the cluster based on an organization’s business requirements and follows the azure well architected framework document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9793,25211339738.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-14 04:21:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Angular App to show icons,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1,"Hello,
I've created a simple app to show all icons at once. Please take a look:
github repo: https://github.com/marcomws/Azure-Architecture-Icons
It can be much more powerful if I can get icons by an API.
I'm planning to implement a search feature in my app.
I'd love to hear from you about this application.
Best Regards,
Marco Sedhom
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/?utm_source=softwarearchitecturetools&utm_medium=listing&utm_campaign=softwarearchitecturetools_listing)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1.0,"Angular App to show icons - Hello,
I've created a simple app to show all icons at once. Please take a look:
github repo: https://github.com/marcomws/Azure-Architecture-Icons
It can be much more powerful if I can get icons by an API.
I'm planning to implement a search feature in my app.
I'd love to hear from you about this application.
Best Regards,
Marco Sedhom
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/?utm_source=softwarearchitecturetools&utm_medium=listing&utm_campaign=softwarearchitecturetools_listing)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1,angular app to show icons hello i ve created a simple app to show all icons at once please take a look github repo it can be much more powerful if i can get icons by an api i m planning to implement a search feature in my app i d love to hear from you about this application best regards marco sedhom document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login edprice msft microsoft alias robbag ,1
10713,27316417256.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-24 16:02:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Customer story reference no longer available,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
Please update the customer story reference on the Next Steps section: Maritz Motivation Solutions customer story- https://customers.microsoft.com/story/maritz is no longer available on the Customer Stories site.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e4f4c7c-f268-b75b-2486-5c4418e5b24e
* Version Independent ID: 5d28faa1-20bc-1727-05ab-0b18eba1ba7c
* Content: [Data warehousing and analytics - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @alexbuckgit
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Customer story reference no longer available -
Please update the customer story reference on the Next Steps section: Maritz Motivation Solutions customer story- https://customers.microsoft.com/story/maritz is no longer available on the Customer Stories site.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e4f4c7c-f268-b75b-2486-5c4418e5b24e
* Version Independent ID: 5d28faa1-20bc-1727-05ab-0b18eba1ba7c
* Content: [Data warehousing and analytics - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/data/data-warehouse.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @alexbuckgit
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,customer story reference no longer available please update the customer story reference on the next steps section maritz motivation solutions customer story is no longer available on the customer stories site document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login alexbuckgit microsoft alias pnp ,1
10613,27145971272.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-16 20:00:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Article has broken links to Deployment Manager,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"This article has a number of links referencing Azure Deployment Manager. These links are broken and should be fixed or removed.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7d6e8b74-b3e5-8acd-f517-39d5137cffc4
* Version Independent ID: e1d6ffde-14d9-8502-2ff2-7a8399de86dc
* Content: [Deployment Stamps pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/deployment-stamp)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/deployment-stamp.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/deployment-stamp.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @johndowns
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Article has broken links to Deployment Manager - This article has a number of links referencing Azure Deployment Manager. These links are broken and should be fixed or removed.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7d6e8b74-b3e5-8acd-f517-39d5137cffc4
* Version Independent ID: e1d6ffde-14d9-8502-2ff2-7a8399de86dc
* Content: [Deployment Stamps pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/deployment-stamp)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/deployment-stamp.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/deployment-stamp.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @johndowns
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,article has broken links to deployment manager this article has a number of links referencing azure deployment manager these links are broken and should be fixed or removed document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login johndowns microsoft alias pnp ,1
11289,29811382022.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-16 15:18:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Inconsistencies of Information,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 design-pattern/subsvc,"The following pattern category in catalog of patterns, particularly Geodes and Materialized View is inconsistent with information in
-[Operational Excellence patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/devops/devops-patterns)
-[Performance Efficiency patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/scalability/performance-efficiency-patterns)
Rate Limit Pattern is categorized as Reliability but it is not categorized in [Reliability patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/resiliency/reliability-patterns)
[Security patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/security/security-patterns) is not included in side navigation [Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771
* Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5
* Content: [Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Inconsistencies of Information - The following pattern category in catalog of patterns, particularly Geodes and Materialized View is inconsistent with information in
-[Operational Excellence patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/devops/devops-patterns)
-[Performance Efficiency patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/scalability/performance-efficiency-patterns)
Rate Limit Pattern is categorized as Reliability but it is not categorized in [Reliability patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/resiliency/reliability-patterns)
[Security patterns](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/security/security-patterns) is not included in side navigation [Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/well-architected/)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771
* Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5
* Content: [Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,inconsistencies of information the following pattern category in catalog of patterns particularly geodes and materialized view is inconsistent with information in rate limit pattern is categorized as reliability but it is not categorized in is not included in side navigation document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
11528,30822223516.0,IssuesEvent,2023-08-01 17:11:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""Moving data from on-premises to Azure is the backbone of migrating on-premises mainframe and midrange applications. """,in-progress assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
[""Moving data from on-premises to Azure is the backbone of migrating on-premises mainframe and midrange applications."" This doesn't make any sense to me. What do you mean by 'backbone of migrating'? ]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8b2740bd-cd04-e1fc-b7ed-7c63ca7c38c3
* Version Independent ID: efaf9a1e-67b3-096e-fbaa-a5e6f4a84719
* Content: [Mainframe file replication and sync on Azure - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/mainframe-azure-file-replication)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/mainframe-azure-file-replication.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/mainframe-azure-file-replication.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @ashish-khandelwal-ms
* Microsoft Alias: **askhande**",1.0,"""Moving data from on-premises to Azure is the backbone of migrating on-premises mainframe and midrange applications. "" -
[""Moving data from on-premises to Azure is the backbone of migrating on-premises mainframe and midrange applications."" This doesn't make any sense to me. What do you mean by 'backbone of migrating'? ]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8b2740bd-cd04-e1fc-b7ed-7c63ca7c38c3
* Version Independent ID: efaf9a1e-67b3-096e-fbaa-a5e6f4a84719
* Content: [Mainframe file replication and sync on Azure - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/mainframe-azure-file-replication)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/mainframe-azure-file-replication.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/mainframe-azure-file-replication.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @ashish-khandelwal-ms
* Microsoft Alias: **askhande**",1, moving data from on premises to azure is the backbone of migrating on premises mainframe and midrange applications document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fbaa content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login ashish khandelwal ms microsoft alias askhande ,1
8344,22067663298.0,IssuesEvent,2022-05-31 06:12:13,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,HONOURED FOR DOING THIS COURSE.,cxp docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
I'm very thankful for doing this course. This certification will help for my career growth and better placements. The course mainly gives me knowledge of Azure and how it functions.
Thank you for Sponsoring this course Free.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"HONOURED FOR DOING THIS COURSE. -
[Enter feedback here]
I'm very thankful for doing this course. This certification will help for my career growth and better placements. The course mainly gives me knowledge of Azure and how it functions.
Thank you for Sponsoring this course Free.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,honoured for doing this course i m very thankful for doing this course this certification will help for my career growth and better placements the course mainly gives me knowledge of azure and how it functions thank you for sponsoring this course free document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
5559,12701399898.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 18:05:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can we deprecate jump boxes?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc triaged,"Hello,
I see in the example on this page that a jump box exists. The concern is that this could be viewed as a suggestion of a best practice. Jump boxes are largely out of practice in contemporary environments and constrain the toolsets available to service / operations personnel unnecessarily -- as well as constrain orchestration models unnecessarily.
Could we maybe shift this to be reflecting some sort of VPN-based configuration or a rule-driven style requiring domain joined machines or similar for entry into the environment?
While not core to the content topic, these contexts do get absorbed by readers when they are designing if they use the article as a reference.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5e5ad897-88ad-5298-b9ff-4d988af52466
* Version Independent ID: 8a3904d9-17ed-0ac0-f006-6997095c86bb
* Content: [N-tier architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/n-tier#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/n-tier.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/n-tier.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can we deprecate jump boxes? - Hello,
I see in the example on this page that a jump box exists. The concern is that this could be viewed as a suggestion of a best practice. Jump boxes are largely out of practice in contemporary environments and constrain the toolsets available to service / operations personnel unnecessarily -- as well as constrain orchestration models unnecessarily.
Could we maybe shift this to be reflecting some sort of VPN-based configuration or a rule-driven style requiring domain joined machines or similar for entry into the environment?
While not core to the content topic, these contexts do get absorbed by readers when they are designing if they use the article as a reference.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5e5ad897-88ad-5298-b9ff-4d988af52466
* Version Independent ID: 8a3904d9-17ed-0ac0-f006-6997095c86bb
* Content: [N-tier architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/n-tier#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/n-tier.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/n-tier.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can we deprecate jump boxes hello i see in the example on this page that a jump box exists the concern is that this could be viewed as a suggestion of a best practice jump boxes are largely out of practice in contemporary environments and constrain the toolsets available to service operations personnel unnecessarily as well as constrain orchestration models unnecessarily could we maybe shift this to be reflecting some sort of vpn based configuration or a rule driven style requiring domain joined machines or similar for entry into the environment while not core to the content topic these contexts do get absorbed by readers when they are designing if they use the article as a reference document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9113,24053070414.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 14:24:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Root Management Group Doc Conflict,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"
The following guidance conflicts with the Enterprise Scale Landing Zone guidance [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/enterprise-scale/management-group-and-subscription-organization)
The recommended approach is to use these management groups:
- Root management group for enterprise-wide resources.
Use the root management group to include identities that have the requirement to apply policies across every resource. For example, regulatory requirements, such as restrictions related to data sovereignty. This group is effective in by applying policies, permissions, tags, across all subscriptions.
We shouldn’t be recommending customer to assign policies at the root management group (at least as a blanket recommendation)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 847ac2f6-75b1-bd29-334d-ac3cb18a7cd8
* Version Independent ID: 6043ad51-542e-9196-0028-7b7c633fcc49
* Content: [Security management groups - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/design-management-groups)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/design-management-groups.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/design-management-groups.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Root Management Group Doc Conflict -
The following guidance conflicts with the Enterprise Scale Landing Zone guidance [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/enterprise-scale/management-group-and-subscription-organization)
The recommended approach is to use these management groups:
- Root management group for enterprise-wide resources.
Use the root management group to include identities that have the requirement to apply policies across every resource. For example, regulatory requirements, such as restrictions related to data sovereignty. This group is effective in by applying policies, permissions, tags, across all subscriptions.
We shouldn’t be recommending customer to assign policies at the root management group (at least as a blanket recommendation)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 847ac2f6-75b1-bd29-334d-ac3cb18a7cd8
* Version Independent ID: 6043ad51-542e-9196-0028-7b7c633fcc49
* Content: [Security management groups - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/design-management-groups)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/design-management-groups.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/design-management-groups.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,root management group doc conflict the following guidance conflicts with the enterprise scale landing zone guidance the recommended approach is to use these management groups root management group for enterprise wide resources use the root management group to include identities that have the requirement to apply policies across every resource for example regulatory requirements such as restrictions related to data sovereignty this group is effective in by applying policies permissions tags across all subscriptions we shouldn’t be recommending customer to assign policies at the root management group at least as a blanket recommendation document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
7730,18990574206.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-22 06:35:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add ANF to diagram,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc,"Geert van Teylingen (ANF PM) here. While the document does describe Azure NetApp Files (ANF) as a valid storage option, the diagram does not show the icon. Can this be added for clarity?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6cf87174-bde3-8399-28a1-124fbb2bb14b
* Version Independent ID: 308cc07d-ffe6-55df-4e21-439c78113f49
* Content: [General mainframe refactor to Azure - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/mainframe/general-mainframe-refactor)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/mainframe/general-mainframe-refactor.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/mainframe/general-mainframe-refactor.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jjfrost
* Microsoft Alias: **jfrost**",1.0,"Add ANF to diagram - Geert van Teylingen (ANF PM) here. While the document does describe Azure NetApp Files (ANF) as a valid storage option, the diagram does not show the icon. Can this be added for clarity?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6cf87174-bde3-8399-28a1-124fbb2bb14b
* Version Independent ID: 308cc07d-ffe6-55df-4e21-439c78113f49
* Content: [General mainframe refactor to Azure - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/mainframe/general-mainframe-refactor)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/mainframe/general-mainframe-refactor.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/mainframe/general-mainframe-refactor.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jjfrost
* Microsoft Alias: **jfrost**",1,add anf to diagram geert van teylingen anf pm here while the document does describe azure netapp files anf as a valid storage option the diagram does not show the icon can this be added for clarity document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login jjfrost microsoft alias jfrost ,1
6037,13541268785.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 15:39:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Where can I find Visio stencils for these new Azure icons?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Where can I find Visio stencils for these new Azure icons? -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,where can i find visio stencils for these new azure icons document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10753,27391412530.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-28 16:29:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add a hyperlink to WebAuthn in Azure Active Directory IDaaS in security operations page,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Add a hyperlink to WebAuthn in following page:
[Azure Active Directory IDaaS in security operations](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security) -> Architectue -> Components -> Credential management -> Passwordless authentication
So readers can know more about WebAuthn.
Current:
> You can also enable passwordless authentication with [FIDO2-compatible security keys](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/howto-authentication-passwordless-security-key), which use WebAuthn and the [FIDO Alliance's Client-to-Authenticator (CTAP) protocol](https://fidoalliance.org/specifications/download/).
Proposed:
> You can also enable passwordless authentication with [FIDO2-compatible security keys](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/howto-authentication-passwordless-security-key), which use [WebAuthn](https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn-2/) and the [FIDO Alliance's Client-to-Authenticator (CTAP) protocol](https://fidoalliance.org/specifications/download/).
_This is my first issue here, please ignore any rookie blunders, and tell me if some more details are required_
I want to contribute, and can create a PR for this. Let me know should I?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d7590665-2688-5da1-54ff-029be05c6376
* Version Independent ID: b1dfa5fa-537e-cf03-bb2f-4b9d79420169
* Content: [Azure Active Directory IDaaS in security operations - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Add a hyperlink to WebAuthn in Azure Active Directory IDaaS in security operations page - Add a hyperlink to WebAuthn in following page:
[Azure Active Directory IDaaS in security operations](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security) -> Architectue -> Components -> Credential management -> Passwordless authentication
So readers can know more about WebAuthn.
Current:
> You can also enable passwordless authentication with [FIDO2-compatible security keys](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/howto-authentication-passwordless-security-key), which use WebAuthn and the [FIDO Alliance's Client-to-Authenticator (CTAP) protocol](https://fidoalliance.org/specifications/download/).
Proposed:
> You can also enable passwordless authentication with [FIDO2-compatible security keys](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/howto-authentication-passwordless-security-key), which use [WebAuthn](https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn-2/) and the [FIDO Alliance's Client-to-Authenticator (CTAP) protocol](https://fidoalliance.org/specifications/download/).
_This is my first issue here, please ignore any rookie blunders, and tell me if some more details are required_
I want to contribute, and can create a PR for this. Let me know should I?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d7590665-2688-5da1-54ff-029be05c6376
* Version Independent ID: b1dfa5fa-537e-cf03-bb2f-4b9d79420169
* Content: [Azure Active Directory IDaaS in security operations - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,add a hyperlink to webauthn in azure active directory idaas in security operations page add a hyperlink to webauthn in following page architectue components credential management passwordless authentication so readers can know more about webauthn current you can also enable passwordless authentication with which use webauthn and the proposed you can also enable passwordless authentication with which use and the this is my first issue here please ignore any rookie blunders and tell me if some more details are required i want to contribute and can create a pr for this let me know should i document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
6432,14562486765.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-17 00:12:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,No Nest Step section in Data considerations page,Pri3 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug triaged,"Hi,
Next Step section is missing in [Data Consideration page](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/data-considerations)
It should be connected to the next page which is [Design patterns for microservices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/patterns)
Basically the follow lines are missing in the first document:
```
## Next steps
> [!div class=""nextstepaction""]
> [Design patterns for microservices](./patterns.md)
```
It might be a stupid error but if someone doesn't pay attention, he/she will not read the next page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: eb25545c-958f-99b0-b321-74e556ad4557
* Version Independent ID: ebe36da6-a15f-f981-787d-8aa4307451a2
* Content: [Data considerations for microservices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/data-considerations)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/data-considerations.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/design/data-considerations.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"No Nest Step section in Data considerations page - Hi,
Next Step section is missing in [Data Consideration page](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/data-considerations)
It should be connected to the next page which is [Design patterns for microservices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/patterns)
Basically the follow lines are missing in the first document:
```
## Next steps
> [!div class=""nextstepaction""]
> [Design patterns for microservices](./patterns.md)
```
It might be a stupid error but if someone doesn't pay attention, he/she will not read the next page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: eb25545c-958f-99b0-b321-74e556ad4557
* Version Independent ID: ebe36da6-a15f-f981-787d-8aa4307451a2
* Content: [Data considerations for microservices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/data-considerations)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/data-considerations.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/design/data-considerations.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,no nest step section in data considerations page hi next step section is missing in it should be connected to the next page which is basically the follow lines are missing in the first document next steps patterns md it might be a stupid error but if someone doesn t pay attention he she will not read the next page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4656,11503351116.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-12 20:55:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Best Practices- missing links,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Some of the Identity Best Practices do not have links to the supporting documentation, please add them.
Actually, having the separate Implementing Identity Best Practices section with the links at the end of the document in a little bit confusing, it would be a little bit easier to follow the text if those links were included in the specific section, maybe as a link to Implementation Guidance/Instructions or something similar
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: def43e94-5049-5848-e385-dda52e7bd3dc
* Version Independent ID: 32cea313-ec24-f5b2-02bf-3cbe5a355a13
* Content: [Identity and Access Management in Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/security/identity#implementing-identity-best-practices-in-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/security/identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/security/identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Best Practices- missing links - Some of the Identity Best Practices do not have links to the supporting documentation, please add them.
Actually, having the separate Implementing Identity Best Practices section with the links at the end of the document in a little bit confusing, it would be a little bit easier to follow the text if those links were included in the specific section, maybe as a link to Implementation Guidance/Instructions or something similar
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: def43e94-5049-5848-e385-dda52e7bd3dc
* Version Independent ID: 32cea313-ec24-f5b2-02bf-3cbe5a355a13
* Content: [Identity and Access Management in Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/security/identity#implementing-identity-best-practices-in-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/security/identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/security/identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,best practices missing links some of the identity best practices do not have links to the supporting documentation please add them actually having the separate implementing identity best practices section with the links at the end of the document in a little bit confusing it would be a little bit easier to follow the text if those links were included in the specific section maybe as a link to implementation guidance instructions or something similar document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10362,26838145538.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 21:23:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,External traffic points like app gateway and LB in the hub segment ,question doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"[A lot of solutions use hub and spoke model. Within this concept, the public IPs that are receiving traffic from internet or private IPs receiving traffic from corporate network act as the Azure subscription hub ingress/egress points .While the Azure AKS App Gw documentation for brownfiled covers show to have App gw in a separate VNET and resource group, however same is not clear for Loadbalancers which might be internal or external. These scenarios can be added to this document.]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"External traffic points like app gateway and LB in the hub segment - [A lot of solutions use hub and spoke model. Within this concept, the public IPs that are receiving traffic from internet or private IPs receiving traffic from corporate network act as the Azure subscription hub ingress/egress points .While the Azure AKS App Gw documentation for brownfiled covers show to have App gw in a separate VNET and resource group, however same is not clear for Loadbalancers which might be internal or external. These scenarios can be added to this document.]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,external traffic points like app gateway and lb in the hub segment document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
3340,9527214780.0,IssuesEvent,2019-04-29 02:28:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Underscore character is not working in VM names,architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"I have a support case where the customer has underscore in VM names (xxx_xx_xxx), and he is getting a validation error. I have reproduced the same error in my subscription. The documentation states that underscore is supported as long as not used at the beginning or end on VM names. Is underscore character supported in VM naming convention?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Underscore character is not working in VM names - I have a support case where the customer has underscore in VM names (xxx_xx_xxx), and he is getting a validation error. I have reproduced the same error in my subscription. The documentation states that underscore is supported as long as not used at the beginning or end on VM names. Is underscore character supported in VM naming convention?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,underscore character is not working in vm names i have a support case where the customer has underscore in vm names xxx xx xxx and he is getting a validation error i have reproduced the same error in my subscription the documentation states that underscore is supported as long as not used at the beginning or end on vm names is underscore character supported in vm naming convention document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
11492,30747771494.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-28 16:22:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Why on-premise servers need to resolve names in private dns zones???,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"In the section ""Traffic flow for an on-premises DNS query"", why the on-premise servers would try to resolve names in private dns zones?
In ""Use a DNS forwarder VM"" section, conditional forwarders are for normal PaaS zone like database.windows.net and it is a good example of how split-brain DNS is achieved in Azure. Why with private DNS resolver, the devices that need to resolve the names, have to know they need to resolve names in private zones???
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Version Independent ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Content: [Azure DNS Private Resolver - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @moorthyannadurai
* Microsoft Alias: **moannadu**",1.0,"Why on-premise servers need to resolve names in private dns zones??? - In the section ""Traffic flow for an on-premises DNS query"", why the on-premise servers would try to resolve names in private dns zones?
In ""Use a DNS forwarder VM"" section, conditional forwarders are for normal PaaS zone like database.windows.net and it is a good example of how split-brain DNS is achieved in Azure. Why with private DNS resolver, the devices that need to resolve the names, have to know they need to resolve names in private zones???
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Version Independent ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Content: [Azure DNS Private Resolver - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @moorthyannadurai
* Microsoft Alias: **moannadu**",1,why on premise servers need to resolve names in private dns zones in the section traffic flow for an on premises dns query why the on premise servers would try to resolve names in private dns zones in use a dns forwarder vm section conditional forwarders are for normal paas zone like database windows net and it is a good example of how split brain dns is achieved in azure why with private dns resolver the devices that need to resolve the names have to know they need to resolve names in private zones document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login moorthyannadurai microsoft alias moannadu ,1
5001,11942327976.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 20:05:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,A few inaccuracies noted on this service comparsion page,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"I noticed a couple of inaccuracies on this service comparison:
1. AWS Glue is AWS fully- managed service utilizing Apache Spark framework not EMR. EMR is IaaS offering. As a result, this comparison should be between Glue and HDsight
- This is in the context comparison below:
EMR | HDInsight | Managed Hadoop service. Deploy and manage Hadoop clusters in Azure.
2. Sagemaker does not do drag and drop.
This is in context of comparing Sagemaker to Azure ML Studio
3. AWS has ELK stack -Elasticsearch used for search engine
This is in the context of comparing CloudSearch and AzureSearch
4. Batch data transfer has AWS DataSync
This is in the context of comparing AWS import/export vs Azure import/export
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"A few inaccuracies noted on this service comparsion page - I noticed a couple of inaccuracies on this service comparison:
1. AWS Glue is AWS fully- managed service utilizing Apache Spark framework not EMR. EMR is IaaS offering. As a result, this comparison should be between Glue and HDsight
- This is in the context comparison below:
EMR | HDInsight | Managed Hadoop service. Deploy and manage Hadoop clusters in Azure.
2. Sagemaker does not do drag and drop.
This is in context of comparing Sagemaker to Azure ML Studio
3. AWS has ELK stack -Elasticsearch used for search engine
This is in the context of comparing CloudSearch and AzureSearch
4. Batch data transfer has AWS DataSync
This is in the context of comparing AWS import/export vs Azure import/export
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,a few inaccuracies noted on this service comparsion page i noticed a couple of inaccuracies on this service comparison aws glue is aws fully managed service utilizing apache spark framework not emr emr is iaas offering as a result this comparison should be between glue and hdsight this is in the context comparison below emr hdinsight managed hadoop service deploy and manage hadoop clusters in azure sagemaker does not do drag and drop this is in context of comparing sagemaker to azure ml studio aws has elk stack elasticsearch used for search engine this is in the context of comparing cloudsearch and azuresearch batch data transfer has aws datasync this is in the context of comparing aws import export vs azure import export document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
4896,11809503628.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-19 15:03:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can you add GCP as well?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-idea triaged,"Would be nice if you can add GCP as well here.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can you add GCP as well? - Would be nice if you can add GCP as well here.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @JasRobe
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can you add gcp as well would be nice if you can add gcp as well here document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login jasrobe microsoft alias pnp ,1
10153,26415488037.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-13 15:38:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing link in next steps,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Under next steps
wrong formatting (i think) has been applied resulting in a non functioning link :
[In-Memory OLTP overview and usage scenarios](/sql/relational-databases/in-memory-oltp/overview-and-usage-scenarios}
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: af4555db-76bc-15c1-6b17-ddf5be651b70
* Version Independent ID: 3ec33db3-f67d-6786-aeb3-9737896088bf
* Content: [Online transaction processing (OLTP) - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing#scalability-capabilities)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Missing link in next steps -
Under next steps
wrong formatting (i think) has been applied resulting in a non functioning link :
[In-Memory OLTP overview and usage scenarios](/sql/relational-databases/in-memory-oltp/overview-and-usage-scenarios}
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: af4555db-76bc-15c1-6b17-ddf5be651b70
* Version Independent ID: 3ec33db3-f67d-6786-aeb3-9737896088bf
* Content: [Online transaction processing (OLTP) - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing#scalability-capabilities)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-transaction-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,missing link in next steps under next steps wrong formatting i think has been applied resulting in a non functioning link sql relational databases in memory oltp overview and usage scenarios document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
7614,18528820835.0,IssuesEvent,2021-10-21 01:29:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AWS Traffic Mirroring Equivalent,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"The page is missing an Azure equivalent solution for AWS Traffic Mirroring.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7b3207bf-471c-33f5-7fb1-0d0a8400e040
* Version Independent ID: f2dc9465-d889-7d8a-02b8-0c0d6125512c
* Content: [Comparing AWS and Azure networking options - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/networking)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/networking.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/networking.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"AWS Traffic Mirroring Equivalent - The page is missing an Azure equivalent solution for AWS Traffic Mirroring.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7b3207bf-471c-33f5-7fb1-0d0a8400e040
* Version Independent ID: f2dc9465-d889-7d8a-02b8-0c0d6125512c
* Content: [Comparing AWS and Azure networking options - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/networking)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/networking.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/networking.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,aws traffic mirroring equivalent the page is missing an azure equivalent solution for aws traffic mirroring document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10925,27540170734.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-07 07:59:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,icons for Data Collection Endpoints and Data Collection Rules,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"
Can the following icons be added:
- Data Collection Endpoints
- Data Collection Rules
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @Zimmergren
* Microsoft Alias: **tozimmergren**",1.0,"icons for Data Collection Endpoints and Data Collection Rules -
Can the following icons be added:
- Data Collection Endpoints
- Data Collection Rules
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @Zimmergren
* Microsoft Alias: **tozimmergren**",1,icons for data collection endpoints and data collection rules can the following icons be added data collection endpoints data collection rules document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login zimmergren microsoft alias tozimmergren ,1
10471,26995338504.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-10 00:12:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Link pages on queue based levelling,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"There should be links both ways between these pages, since one is really a specialisation of the other.
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 495b2ac1-3a9c-d1db-2b46-bbfbd0a4b538
* Version Independent ID: 2f6008fa-9b45-6ce1-13b5-74f82550f715
* Content: [Web-Queue-Worker architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Link pages on queue based levelling - There should be links both ways between these pages, since one is really a specialisation of the other.
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 495b2ac1-3a9c-d1db-2b46-bbfbd0a4b538
* Version Independent ID: 2f6008fa-9b45-6ce1-13b5-74f82550f715
* Content: [Web-Queue-Worker architecture style - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/architecture-styles/web-queue-worker.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,link pages on queue based levelling there should be links both ways between these pages since one is really a specialisation of the other document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
6041,13542406450.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 17:17:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Please expand the article ""Machine Learning model training with AKS"" with more details",Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Please expand this article with moreinformation (implementation details, pricing guidance, code examples, etc),
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c04a7e7b-ebe4-b967-3cd1-fab859a9a43f
* Version Independent ID: 3368462d-475c-2a21-07db-c23b557c5144
* Content: [Machine Learning model training with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please expand the article ""Machine Learning model training with AKS"" with more details - Please expand this article with moreinformation (implementation details, pricing guidance, code examples, etc),
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c04a7e7b-ebe4-b967-3cd1-fab859a9a43f
* Version Independent ID: 3368462d-475c-2a21-07db-c23b557c5144
* Content: [Machine Learning model training with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please expand the article machine learning model training with aks with more details please expand this article with moreinformation implementation details pricing guidance code examples etc document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11068,27947269143.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 05:02:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,10GB Partition key limit is incorrect. It's 20GB,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 best-practice/subsvc,"Look under the Cosmos DB section (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies#partitioning-azure-cosmos-db) There are a few places where 10GB should be updated to 20GB.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ef578ecf-7b41-cac8-ba5d-2e132c337b1e
* Version Independent ID: f325ab09-f55d-42ce-5892-a116d4958d6c
* Content: [Data partitioning strategies - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies#partitioning-azure-cosmos-db)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"10GB Partition key limit is incorrect. It's 20GB - Look under the Cosmos DB section (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies#partitioning-azure-cosmos-db) There are a few places where 10GB should be updated to 20GB.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ef578ecf-7b41-cac8-ba5d-2e132c337b1e
* Version Independent ID: f325ab09-f55d-42ce-5892-a116d4958d6c
* Content: [Data partitioning strategies - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies#partitioning-azure-cosmos-db)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1, partition key limit is incorrect it s look under the cosmos db section there are a few places where should be updated to document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
6223,13941733974.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-22 19:52:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed, Incorrect Visio diagram,Pri2 architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc,"
The Visio diagram referenced for download is incorrect.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0," Incorrect Visio diagram -
The Visio diagram referenced for download is incorrect.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, incorrect visio diagram the visio diagram referenced for download is incorrect document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9121,24055701478.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 16:38:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,mistake in flow chart,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
Selection flow chart has error
Selecting full flagged orchestration >> NO >> full flagged orchestration >> YES ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**
",1.0,"mistake in flow chart -
Selection flow chart has error
Selecting full flagged orchestration >> NO >> full flagged orchestration >> YES ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**
",1,mistake in flow chart selection flow chart has error selecting full flagged orchestration no full flagged orchestration yes document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4957,11886840000.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-27 23:10:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,text phrase issue,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-design-principles/subsvc,"In this para in the page - ""Terraform: Terraform is a cloud-agnostic declarative framework that supports many private and public clouds, being Azure one of them. It has the main advantage of offering a cloud-agnostic framework: while Terraform configurations are specific to each cloud, the framework itself is the same for all of them.""
Have a question on this phrase - ""being Azure one of them."" shouldn't this written like ""Azure being one of them.""?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5490ef64-9b6d-59be-1e9b-a2b2d10388b2
* Version Independent ID: 4e37976c-47f3-1481-b312-e7be38f93e07
* Content: [Infrastructure Deployment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/iac?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/iac.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/iac.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @Jose-Moreno
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"text phrase issue - In this para in the page - ""Terraform: Terraform is a cloud-agnostic declarative framework that supports many private and public clouds, being Azure one of them. It has the main advantage of offering a cloud-agnostic framework: while Terraform configurations are specific to each cloud, the framework itself is the same for all of them.""
Have a question on this phrase - ""being Azure one of them."" shouldn't this written like ""Azure being one of them.""?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5490ef64-9b6d-59be-1e9b-a2b2d10388b2
* Version Independent ID: 4e37976c-47f3-1481-b312-e7be38f93e07
* Content: [Infrastructure Deployment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/iac?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/iac.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/iac.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @Jose-Moreno
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,text phrase issue in this para in the page terraform terraform is a cloud agnostic declarative framework that supports many private and public clouds being azure one of them it has the main advantage of offering a cloud agnostic framework while terraform configurations are specific to each cloud the framework itself is the same for all of them have a question on this phrase being azure one of them shouldn t this written like azure being one of them document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login jose moreno microsoft alias pnp ,1
9094,24037110031.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 20:17:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure virtual network subnets link appears to be incorrect,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"Resolves to https://almbok.com/office365/microsoft_cloud_it_architecture_resources which has nothing to do with the topic.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f78e284-fb28-8ac2-0ce6-590b48c74a45
* Version Independent ID: 3baed527-6023-bc26-d3f9-9fda0a43925e
* Content: [Network security and containment in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/Security/network-security-containment#design-virtual-network-subnet-security)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/network-security-containment.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/network-security-containment.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure virtual network subnets link appears to be incorrect - Resolves to https://almbok.com/office365/microsoft_cloud_it_architecture_resources which has nothing to do with the topic.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f78e284-fb28-8ac2-0ce6-590b48c74a45
* Version Independent ID: 3baed527-6023-bc26-d3f9-9fda0a43925e
* Content: [Network security and containment in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/Security/network-security-containment#design-virtual-network-subnet-security)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/network-security-containment.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/network-security-containment.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure virtual network subnets link appears to be incorrect resolves to which has nothing to do with the topic document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9099,24037890270.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 21:03:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Typo,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"In the picture, it is written ""IDistrubutedTokenCache"" instead of ""IDistributedTokenCache"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab204a8d-c451-ef99-6610-139a0dee61ac
* Version Independent ID: 23a69ae2-70bc-aab5-bbe1-e9699d57558b
* Content: [Cache access tokens in a multitenant application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/token-cache)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Typo - In the picture, it is written ""IDistrubutedTokenCache"" instead of ""IDistributedTokenCache"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab204a8d-c451-ef99-6610-139a0dee61ac
* Version Independent ID: 23a69ae2-70bc-aab5-bbe1-e9699d57558b
* Content: [Cache access tokens in a multitenant application - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/token-cache)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo in the picture it is written idistrubutedtokencache instead of idistributedtokencache document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10274,26645601349.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-25 09:44:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,wordiness,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"""Adding the extra layer to the application to implement the gatekeeper pattern will likely impact performance due to the additional processing and network communication required.""
No.
This additional Gatekeeper layer between the client and protected service will diminish performance.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 428e4625-191f-a050-ec58-60fd2dddff86
* Version Independent ID: 3a4e385e-5761-3633-1ddf-46e1878b420d
* Content: [Gatekeeper pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/gatekeeper)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/gatekeeper.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/gatekeeper.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"wordiness - ""Adding the extra layer to the application to implement the gatekeeper pattern will likely impact performance due to the additional processing and network communication required.""
No.
This additional Gatekeeper layer between the client and protected service will diminish performance.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 428e4625-191f-a050-ec58-60fd2dddff86
* Version Independent ID: 3a4e385e-5761-3633-1ddf-46e1878b420d
* Content: [Gatekeeper pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/gatekeeper)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/gatekeeper.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/gatekeeper.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,wordiness adding the extra layer to the application to implement the gatekeeper pattern will likely impact performance due to the additional processing and network communication required no this additional gatekeeper layer between the client and protected service will diminish performance document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
10337,26793231067.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-01 10:02:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Cannot find a general ""Azure"" icon",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"It would be very handy to have a general ""Azure"" (the blue A symbol) icon in the download pack.
For people doing multi-cloud-provider architectures.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Cannot find a general ""Azure"" icon - It would be very handy to have a general ""Azure"" (the blue A symbol) icon in the download pack.
For people doing multi-cloud-provider architectures.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,cannot find a general azure icon it would be very handy to have a general azure the blue a symbol icon in the download pack for people doing multi cloud provider architectures document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4562,11354211173.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-24 17:05:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Invalid syntax in example.,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc,"The example shows the syntax `for (;;)` which is clearly invalid.
I think we somehow trimmed out the content like `for (var i = 1; i <= 5; i++)` or something like it.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 497c1436-d32c-1fb5-3209-22058fece4b2
* Version Independent ID: 4818d7be-c866-39bc-f2c3-d7af59d2cd4e
* Content: [Retry pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/retry#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/retry.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/retry.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Invalid syntax in example. - The example shows the syntax `for (;;)` which is clearly invalid.
I think we somehow trimmed out the content like `for (var i = 1; i <= 5; i++)` or something like it.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 497c1436-d32c-1fb5-3209-22058fece4b2
* Version Independent ID: 4818d7be-c866-39bc-f2c3-d7af59d2cd4e
* Content: [Retry pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/retry#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/retry.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/retry.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,invalid syntax in example the example shows the syntax for which is clearly invalid i think we somehow trimmed out the content like for var i i lt i or something like it document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9672,25017773878.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:29:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,TPM.2.0,assigned-to-author needs-more-info triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Fundamentals - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"TPM.2.0 -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Fundamentals - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,tpm document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
4758,11671676969.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-04 04:01:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Functions,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp product-question triaged,"Shouldn't Azure Functions be considered due to the infinite run time on the app service plan and durable functions?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs#types-of-background-jobs)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Functions - Shouldn't Azure Functions be considered due to the infinite run time on the app service plan and durable functions?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs#types-of-background-jobs)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure functions shouldn t azure functions be considered due to the infinite run time on the app service plan and durable functions document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id dcef content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9242,24283632586.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-28 19:46:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Updated Azure Databricks icon,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks icon on [this diagram](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/images/stream-processing-databricks.png) on the [Stream Processing with Azure Databricks](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks) architecture with this new SVG file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13z9cECUZsyu8ZjWzHErUZbAhuO_jXlUK/
Thank you,
Clinton Ford
Principal Product Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 42385d9e-bf16-c83f-4cc4-bc7819b7c72a
* Version Independent ID: 8ff90608-83ab-fe3f-c01a-5e4e288f28fc
* Content: [Stream processing with Azure Databricks - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Updated Azure Databricks icon - Hi, could you help me update the Azure Databricks icon on [this diagram](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/images/stream-processing-databricks.png) on the [Stream Processing with Azure Databricks](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks) architecture with this new SVG file: https://drive.google.com/file/d/13z9cECUZsyu8ZjWzHErUZbAhuO_jXlUK/
Thank you,
Clinton Ford
Principal Product Marketing Manager
Databricks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 42385d9e-bf16-c83f-4cc4-bc7819b7c72a
* Version Independent ID: 8ff90608-83ab-fe3f-c01a-5e4e288f28fc
* Content: [Stream processing with Azure Databricks - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,updated azure databricks icon hi could you help me update the azure databricks icon on on the architecture with this new svg file thank you clinton ford principal product marketing manager databricks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4369,11007741889.0,IssuesEvent,2019-12-04 09:09:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""might"" or ""might not""?",Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp product-question triaged,"Hello!
I have a doubt about a phrase in this paragraph:
""If the client code runs in a web browser, the browser might need to support cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) to enable code that executes within the web browser to access data in a different domain from the one that served the page. Some older browsers and some data stores don't support CORS, and code that runs in these browsers **might be able to** use a valet key to provide access to data in a different domain, such as a cloud storage account.""
By semantic it should be ""might **not** be able to"", am I right?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d94a95d1-5371-4c6a-87d6-00fae7dfb401
* Version Independent ID: d9abac19-dfd7-18d7-2479-42fe5476b569
* Content: [Valet Key pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/valet-key#issues-and-considerations)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/valet-key.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/valet-key.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"""might"" or ""might not""? - Hello!
I have a doubt about a phrase in this paragraph:
""If the client code runs in a web browser, the browser might need to support cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) to enable code that executes within the web browser to access data in a different domain from the one that served the page. Some older browsers and some data stores don't support CORS, and code that runs in these browsers **might be able to** use a valet key to provide access to data in a different domain, such as a cloud storage account.""
By semantic it should be ""might **not** be able to"", am I right?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d94a95d1-5371-4c6a-87d6-00fae7dfb401
* Version Independent ID: d9abac19-dfd7-18d7-2479-42fe5476b569
* Content: [Valet Key pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/valet-key#issues-and-considerations)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/valet-key.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/valet-key.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, might or might not hello i have a doubt about a phrase in this paragraph if the client code runs in a web browser the browser might need to support cross origin resource sharing cors to enable code that executes within the web browser to access data in a different domain from the one that served the page some older browsers and some data stores don t support cors and code that runs in these browsers might be able to use a valet key to provide access to data in a different domain such as a cloud storage account by semantic it should be might not be able to am i right document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
3619,9882737013.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-24 17:37:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Serverless vs Container,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Please can you elaborate on why it is below?
""
It can be challenging to build a complex application using a serverless architecture.
""
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 93139ee2-ff91-ee5e-a056-8d6b597a81f3
* Version Independent ID: 8b4436e0-094c-9602-2ead-43bb3b2f98f1
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute option for microservices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/design/compute-options#next-steps)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/compute-options.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/design/compute-options.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Serverless vs Container - Please can you elaborate on why it is below?
""
It can be challenging to build a complex application using a serverless architecture.
""
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 93139ee2-ff91-ee5e-a056-8d6b597a81f3
* Version Independent ID: 8b4436e0-094c-9602-2ead-43bb3b2f98f1
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute option for microservices](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/microservices/design/compute-options#next-steps)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/compute-options.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/design/compute-options.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,serverless vs container please can you elaborate on why it is below it can be challenging to build a complex application using a serverless architecture document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
11033,27809753895.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-18 01:38:16,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Good job,cxp product-feedback docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
This page was extremely helpful for us to understand and plan our Azure Front Door implementation.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ddfaa14a-8031-7723-7687-2c4bdbbfb003
* Version Independent ID: ddfaa14a-8031-7723-7687-2c4bdbbfb003
* Content: [Use Azure Front Door in a multitenant solution - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/multitenant/service/front-door)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/multitenant/service/front-door.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/multitenant/service/front-door.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @rajnemani
* Microsoft Alias: **ranema**",1.0,"Good job -
This page was extremely helpful for us to understand and plan our Azure Front Door implementation.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ddfaa14a-8031-7723-7687-2c4bdbbfb003
* Version Independent ID: ddfaa14a-8031-7723-7687-2c4bdbbfb003
* Content: [Use Azure Front Door in a multitenant solution - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/multitenant/service/front-door)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/multitenant/service/front-door.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/multitenant/service/front-door.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @rajnemani
* Microsoft Alias: **ranema**",1,good job this page was extremely helpful for us to understand and plan our azure front door implementation document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login rajnemani microsoft alias ranema ,1
5091,12057198775.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-15 15:29:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Security options for Azure Search are out of date,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"Azure Search supports IP based access restrictions, as well as private endpoints and private link https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/search-security-overview.
They also support encryption of data at rest, and encryption of data in transit.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bc525ce2-d021-8e7a-2a88-10b84a2a37e6
* Version Independent ID: 53450f8d-f877-a903-2101-e4265ef6ec75
* Content: [Choosing a search data store - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Security options for Azure Search are out of date - Azure Search supports IP based access restrictions, as well as private endpoints and private link https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/search/search-security-overview.
They also support encryption of data at rest, and encryption of data in transit.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bc525ce2-d021-8e7a-2a88-10b84a2a37e6
* Version Independent ID: 53450f8d-f877-a903-2101-e4265ef6ec75
* Content: [Choosing a search data store - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/search-options.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,security options for azure search are out of date azure search supports ip based access restrictions as well as private endpoints and private link they also support encryption of data at rest and encryption of data in transit document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
6496,14667328827.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-29 18:21:12,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Template validation ignores conditional deployment, complains about array-out-of-bounds",Pri3 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"I am trying to conditionally deploy a block of resources based on an array in a parameter that has a default value of `[]`. My resource condition is `[not(empty(parameters('myArray'))]`. I keep getting `property array index out of bounds` errors during validation, except that...the array is supposed to be empty and the entire block should be skipped.
Is the validator sophisticated enough to do this or do I have to concoct something?",1.0,"Template validation ignores conditional deployment, complains about array-out-of-bounds - I am trying to conditionally deploy a block of resources based on an array in a parameter that has a default value of `[]`. My resource condition is `[not(empty(parameters('myArray'))]`. I keep getting `property array index out of bounds` errors during validation, except that...the array is supposed to be empty and the entire block should be skipped.
Is the validator sophisticated enough to do this or do I have to concoct something?",1,template validation ignores conditional deployment complains about array out of bounds i am trying to conditionally deploy a block of resources based on an array in a parameter that has a default value of my resource condition is i keep getting property array index out of bounds errors during validation except that the array is supposed to be empty and the entire block should be skipped is the validator sophisticated enough to do this or do i have to concoct something ,1
4548,11312083001.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-20 05:08:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure SQL,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-provided reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Why is there no reference to Azure SQL in the reference architectures? Can't we use Azure SQL that has inherent high-availability, is a managed service that needs no AlwaysON configuration management?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: be033e7f-d78f-f63f-c9b5-f08130315704
* Version Independent ID: d66f5650-fffb-79a6-ee59-40eaad06cd4f
* Content: [Multi-region N-tier application for high availability - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Azure SQL - Why is there no reference to Azure SQL in the reference architectures? Can't we use Azure SQL that has inherent high-availability, is a managed service that needs no AlwaysON configuration management?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: be033e7f-d78f-f63f-c9b5-f08130315704
* Version Independent ID: d66f5650-fffb-79a6-ee59-40eaad06cd4f
* Content: [Multi-region N-tier application for high availability - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/multi-region-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure sql why is there no reference to azure sql in the reference architectures can t we use azure sql that has inherent high availability is a managed service that needs no alwayson configuration management document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fffb content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
4970,11907496270.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-30 22:26:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Duplicate page titles,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"There are 2 pages in the Solutions Ideas section with the exact same title ""Medical Data Storage Solutions"". Please change one of them to minimize confusion
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7f5f1109-6e79-d75f-44a6-c573e214e351
* Version Independent ID: a63bdc30-afca-f42a-591b-2c4c2abfc025
* Content: [Medical Data Storage Solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Duplicate page titles - There are 2 pages in the Solutions Ideas section with the exact same title ""Medical Data Storage Solutions"". Please change one of them to minimize confusion
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7f5f1109-6e79-d75f-44a6-c573e214e351
* Version Independent ID: a63bdc30-afca-f42a-591b-2c4c2abfc025
* Content: [Medical Data Storage Solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/security-compliance-blueprint-hippa-hitrust-health-data-ai.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,duplicate page titles there are pages in the solutions ideas section with the exact same title medical data storage solutions please change one of them to minimize confusion document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afca content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5588,12746063074.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-26 15:17:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Double-Take DR - Azure Solution,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
I am looking for this architecture, how we can implement on Azure Cloud. Is it a separate services available from Azure
This architecture will help to achieve on-demand DR on Azure.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 82dcb69b-d7f0-4a59-cc3e-46cc7dcf1469
* Version Independent ID: 6b691aff-88eb-5444-47ea-f06103d28e6a
* Content: [SMB disaster recovery with Double-Take DR - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-double-take-dr)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-double-take-dr.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-double-take-dr.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Double-Take DR - Azure Solution -
I am looking for this architecture, how we can implement on Azure Cloud. Is it a separate services available from Azure
This architecture will help to achieve on-demand DR on Azure.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 82dcb69b-d7f0-4a59-cc3e-46cc7dcf1469
* Version Independent ID: 6b691aff-88eb-5444-47ea-f06103d28e6a
* Content: [SMB disaster recovery with Double-Take DR - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-double-take-dr)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-double-take-dr.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-smb-double-take-dr.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,double take dr azure solution i am looking for this architecture how we can implement on azure cloud is it a separate services available from azure this architecture will help to achieve on demand dr on azure document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
3946,10335520483.0,IssuesEvent,2019-09-03 10:47:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Difference in resource type naming prefix or suffix ,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp duplicate triaged,"This document shows resource types as suffixes, yet another page (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/cloud-adoption/ready/considerations/name-and-tag#recommended-resource-type-prefixes) has the resource types as prefixes
Consistency would be nice :-)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#naming-rules-and-restrictions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Difference in resource type naming prefix or suffix - This document shows resource types as suffixes, yet another page (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/cloud-adoption/ready/considerations/name-and-tag#recommended-resource-type-prefixes) has the resource types as prefixes
Consistency would be nice :-)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#naming-rules-and-restrictions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,difference in resource type naming prefix or suffix this document shows resource types as suffixes yet another page has the resource types as prefixes consistency would be nice document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
11502,30774535156.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-31 04:53:12,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Conflicting note and script,architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"The first Note in this article says that this scenario assumes existence of a vnet but then the 2nd PS script creates one. What am I missing?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/web-apps/api-management/architectures/protect-apis)
* Content Source: [docs/web-apps/api-management/architectures/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/web-apps/api-management/architectures/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",2.0,"Conflicting note and script - The first Note in this article says that this scenario assumes existence of a vnet but then the 2nd PS script creates one. What am I missing?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/web-apps/api-management/architectures/protect-apis)
* Content Source: [docs/web-apps/api-management/architectures/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/web-apps/api-management/architectures/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1,conflicting note and script the first note in this article says that this scenario assumes existence of a vnet but then the ps script creates one what am i missing document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fada content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login fabriciosanchez microsoft alias robbag ,1
5002,11942335989.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 20:06:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Kafka Streams API,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc docs-experience triaged,"Kafka Streams API should also be present here for comparison. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/hdinsight/kafka/apache-kafka-streams-api
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 957618b3-8d25-49c4-950c-0c044d68f443
* Version Independent ID: 2ab67665-066b-fb14-9763-a12693b19bec
* Content: [Choosing a stream processing technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Kafka Streams API - Kafka Streams API should also be present here for comparison. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/hdinsight/kafka/apache-kafka-streams-api
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 957618b3-8d25-49c4-950c-0c044d68f443
* Version Independent ID: 2ab67665-066b-fb14-9763-a12693b19bec
* Content: [Choosing a stream processing technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,kafka streams api kafka streams api should also be present here for comparison document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
7463,17934625799.0,IssuesEvent,2021-09-10 13:54:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,visio file link is outdated and does not depict the diagram that is on the page.,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
visio file link https://arch-center.azureedge.net/app-service-reference-architectures.vsdx is outdated and does not depict the diagram that is on the page. see attached
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web app - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"visio file link is outdated and does not depict the diagram that is on the page. -
[Enter feedback here]
visio file link https://arch-center.azureedge.net/app-service-reference-architectures.vsdx is outdated and does not depict the diagram that is on the page. see attached
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web app - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio file link is outdated and does not depict the diagram that is on the page visio file link is outdated and does not depict the diagram that is on the page see attached document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
7090,16495283325.0,IssuesEvent,2021-05-25 09:42:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure firewall private IP mismatch,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug example-scenario/subsvc triaged,"
Diagram under title 'Azure Firewall only' says private IP of firewall is **192.168.100.4** but in content (bullet point 2) says IP is **192.168.100.7**. It's a typo error and the same error is throughout the whole page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall and Application Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure firewall private IP mismatch -
Diagram under title 'Azure Firewall only' says private IP of firewall is **192.168.100.4** but in content (bullet point 2) says IP is **192.168.100.7**. It's a typo error and the same error is throughout the whole page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall and Application Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure firewall private ip mismatch diagram under title azure firewall only says private ip of firewall is but in content bullet point says ip is it s a typo error and the same error is throughout the whole page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login erjosito microsoft alias pnp ,1
9713,25103781987.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:17:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Consider adding WAF to this reference architecture,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
The premise of this reference architecture is to be actionable guidance on secure connectivity, but Traffic Manager is resolving directly to App Service instances rather than using an Azure App Gateway in WAF mode or replacing Traffic Manager with Azure Front Door (WAF enabled). To better reflect how this scenario should be realized in the real world, please consider extending to include a WAF.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d0461064-5b0f-2722-c228-cc04aef150c9
* Version Independent ID: 705b8a1a-787e-c09f-dff3-c25373743d1d
* Content: [Multi-region web app with private connectivity to database - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/sql-failover/app-service-private-sql-multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/sql-failover/app-service-private-sql-multi-region.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/sql-failover/app-service-private-sql-multi-region.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Consider adding WAF to this reference architecture -
The premise of this reference architecture is to be actionable guidance on secure connectivity, but Traffic Manager is resolving directly to App Service instances rather than using an Azure App Gateway in WAF mode or replacing Traffic Manager with Azure Front Door (WAF enabled). To better reflect how this scenario should be realized in the real world, please consider extending to include a WAF.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d0461064-5b0f-2722-c228-cc04aef150c9
* Version Independent ID: 705b8a1a-787e-c09f-dff3-c25373743d1d
* Content: [Multi-region web app with private connectivity to database - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/sql-failover/app-service-private-sql-multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/sql-failover/app-service-private-sql-multi-region.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/sql-failover/app-service-private-sql-multi-region.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,consider adding waf to this reference architecture the premise of this reference architecture is to be actionable guidance on secure connectivity but traffic manager is resolving directly to app service instances rather than using an azure app gateway in waf mode or replacing traffic manager with azure front door waf enabled to better reflect how this scenario should be realized in the real world please consider extending to include a waf document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login jelledruyts microsoft alias edprice ,1
4493,11221845352.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-07 18:47:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Host name vs computer name,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"(I would make an edit but the Edit link is returning a 404)
The ""host name"" referred to in the note here appears to be what is referred to as ""computer name"" in the Portal and at the link below.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/windows/overview#naming
If possible I would like to standardize by changing this doc to use ""computer name"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1ddc35bf-00d9-67c8-bf6a-ade5ebea07ca
* Version Independent ID: 7324a1e6-7010-c620-145b-3d8027709545
* Content: [Naming rules and restrictions for Azure resources](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/resource-naming)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @DerMar
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Host name vs computer name - (I would make an edit but the Edit link is returning a 404)
The ""host name"" referred to in the note here appears to be what is referred to as ""computer name"" in the Portal and at the link below.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/windows/overview#naming
If possible I would like to standardize by changing this doc to use ""computer name"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1ddc35bf-00d9-67c8-bf6a-ade5ebea07ca
* Version Independent ID: 7324a1e6-7010-c620-145b-3d8027709545
* Content: [Naming rules and restrictions for Azure resources](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/resource-naming)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @DerMar
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,host name vs computer name i would make an edit but the edit link is returning a the host name referred to in the note here appears to be what is referred to as computer name in the portal and at the link below if possible i would like to standardize by changing this doc to use computer name document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login dermar microsoft alias pnp ,1
7617,18545766000.0,IssuesEvent,2021-10-21 21:56:16,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Excellent section worthy of it's own page,assigned-to-author kudos triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc,"
This particular section related to considerations:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aks-agic/aks-agic#considerations
is an exceptional best practices document for AKS and containerized applications in general. I would reccommend promoting this guidance to a higher first order level guidance document. It's hidden away in a very specific edge case'ish page but would be very valuable as a first order document. I use and reference it in customer architecture conversations, regardless of AGIC/multi tenant AKS context.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 869bcb5b-4828-adcd-98f8-fd4681d8110d
* Version Independent ID: 54aade79-aca5-deef-7d26-a7baa22c36c7
* Content: [Use Application Gateway Ingress Controller (AGIC) with a multi-tenant Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aks-agic/aks-agic#considerations)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/aks-agic/aks-agic.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/aks-agic/aks-agic.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @paolosalvatori
* Microsoft Alias: **paolos**",1.0,"Excellent section worthy of it's own page -
This particular section related to considerations:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aks-agic/aks-agic#considerations
is an exceptional best practices document for AKS and containerized applications in general. I would reccommend promoting this guidance to a higher first order level guidance document. It's hidden away in a very specific edge case'ish page but would be very valuable as a first order document. I use and reference it in customer architecture conversations, regardless of AGIC/multi tenant AKS context.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 869bcb5b-4828-adcd-98f8-fd4681d8110d
* Version Independent ID: 54aade79-aca5-deef-7d26-a7baa22c36c7
* Content: [Use Application Gateway Ingress Controller (AGIC) with a multi-tenant Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aks-agic/aks-agic#considerations)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/aks-agic/aks-agic.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/aks-agic/aks-agic.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @paolosalvatori
* Microsoft Alias: **paolos**",1,excellent section worthy of it s own page this particular section related to considerations is an exceptional best practices document for aks and containerized applications in general i would reccommend promoting this guidance to a higher first order level guidance document it s hidden away in a very specific edge case ish page but would be very valuable as a first order document i use and reference it in customer architecture conversations regardless of agic multi tenant aks context document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id adcd version independent id deef content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login paolosalvatori microsoft alias paolos ,1
7125,16629455739.0,IssuesEvent,2021-06-03 13:53:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Typo,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
""Synapse Mana private endpoints"" link is misspelled, needs to be Synapse Manged Private endpoints
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6cce4daf-bd8d-bd82-54a0-17e905a1c150
* Version Independent ID: 0dbc5354-031f-2d79-99da-68f9719e89d4
* Content: [Big data analytics with enterprise-grade security using Azure Synapse - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-analytics-enterprise-grade-security)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-analytics-enterprise-grade-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-analytics-enterprise-grade-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **kikalyan**",1.0,"Typo -
[Enter feedback here]
""Synapse Mana private endpoints"" link is misspelled, needs to be Synapse Manged Private endpoints
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6cce4daf-bd8d-bd82-54a0-17e905a1c150
* Version Independent ID: 0dbc5354-031f-2d79-99da-68f9719e89d4
* Content: [Big data analytics with enterprise-grade security using Azure Synapse - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-analytics-enterprise-grade-security)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-analytics-enterprise-grade-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-analytics-enterprise-grade-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **kikalyan**",1,typo synapse mana private endpoints link is misspelled needs to be synapse manged private endpoints document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias kikalyan ,1
10292,26673499591.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-26 12:26:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Networking considerations need to take into account different network plugins/requirements for podIPs,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"This section would need to take into account the kubenet network plugin option for pod IPs and the new network plugin set to replace Azure CNI which would remove the requirement to assign 1st-class IPs to pods. These points are also more relevant considering that the AppGW is not leveraged by the AGIC since there's a Traefik ingress controller.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",2.0,"Networking considerations need to take into account different network plugins/requirements for podIPs - This section would need to take into account the kubenet network plugin option for pod IPs and the new network plugin set to replace Azure CNI which would remove the requirement to assign 1st-class IPs to pods. These points are also more relevant considering that the AppGW is not leveraged by the AGIC since there's a Traefik ingress controller.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",1,networking considerations need to take into account different network plugins requirements for podips this section would need to take into account the kubenet network plugin option for pod ips and the new network plugin set to replace azure cni which would remove the requirement to assign class ips to pods these points are also more relevant considering that the appgw is not leveraged by the agic since there s a traefik ingress controller document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias prwilk ,1
10076,26196572069.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-03 13:59:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Possible improvement to image on Solution section of the Claim-Check pattern page,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"We were reviewing the diagram in the Solution section and felt that having arrows (1/2/3/4) might be beneficial for some readers, to make it clearer that the reference included in the middle message is a result of having stored the payload to the data store.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1970e0cd-53ae-02f6-479b-9ca386a5220e
* Version Independent ID: 8a81baa3-61c2-a8f6-540c-9a239583b8d6
* Content: [Claim-Check pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/claim-check#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/claim-check.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/claim-check.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @yorek
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Possible improvement to image on Solution section of the Claim-Check pattern page - We were reviewing the diagram in the Solution section and felt that having arrows (1/2/3/4) might be beneficial for some readers, to make it clearer that the reference included in the middle message is a result of having stored the payload to the data store.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1970e0cd-53ae-02f6-479b-9ca386a5220e
* Version Independent ID: 8a81baa3-61c2-a8f6-540c-9a239583b8d6
* Content: [Claim-Check pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/claim-check#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/claim-check.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/claim-check.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @yorek
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,possible improvement to image on solution section of the claim check pattern page we were reviewing the diagram in the solution section and felt that having arrows might be beneficial for some readers to make it clearer that the reference included in the middle message is a result of having stored the payload to the data store document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login yorek microsoft alias pnp ,1
11560,30991134692.0,IssuesEvent,2023-08-09 04:50:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Expand on this,cxp needs-more-info triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"Expand on this
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fe44a625-07a6-7d65-d16e-a8544c034261
* Version Independent ID: 54310bdb-1397-cd5a-688c-f8e5c042a3fb
* Content: [Custom business processes - Azure Solution Ideas](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @Zimmergren
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Expand on this - Expand on this
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fe44a625-07a6-7d65-d16e-a8544c034261
* Version Independent ID: 54310bdb-1397-cd5a-688c-f8e5c042a3fb
* Content: [Custom business processes - Azure Solution Ideas](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @Zimmergren
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,expand on this expand on this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login zimmergren microsoft alias architectures ,1
8891,23722826679.0,IssuesEvent,2022-08-30 16:45:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incorrect information on auto upgrade status,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Hi
Please fix the last 2 bullets on the page to show that auto upgrade for clusters and node images are fully GA now.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Incorrect information on auto upgrade status -
Hi
Please fix the last 2 bullets on the page to show that auto upgrade for clusters and node images are fully GA now.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,incorrect information on auto upgrade status hi please fix the last bullets on the page to show that auto upgrade for clusters and node images are fully ga now document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login rishabhsaha microsoft alias pnp ,1
9678,25018248264.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:57:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Integrate AAD for the workload to be be updated with Azure AD Workload Identity,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Integrate Azure Active Directory for the workload section should be updated as Pod Identity V1 will not GA, should be updated with Azure AD Workload Identity which is the new name for Pod Identity V2
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#integrate-azure-active-directory-for-the-workload)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Integrate AAD for the workload to be be updated with Azure AD Workload Identity -
Integrate Azure Active Directory for the workload section should be updated as Pod Identity V1 will not GA, should be updated with Azure AD Workload Identity which is the new name for Pod Identity V2
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#integrate-azure-active-directory-for-the-workload)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,integrate aad for the workload to be be updated with azure ad workload identity integrate azure active directory for the workload section should be updated as pod identity will not ga should be updated with azure ad workload identity which is the new name for pod identity document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10396,26911098158.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-06 23:53:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AWS ECS Fargate equivalent should be Azure Container Apps,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri1,"Hello team,
I've been doing some research regarding serverless Container as a Service (CaaS) options. Is true that Azure Container Instances is a CaaS, however it does not have the scalability that AWS ECS has.
So, I would say that is not accurate to mention that AWS ECS = Azure Container Instances, because ACI is not escalable.
I suggest to edit this: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#containers-and-container-orchestrators :
And add Azure Container Apps instead of ACI as a more accurate equivalent to AWS ECS Fargate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1.0,"AWS ECS Fargate equivalent should be Azure Container Apps - Hello team,
I've been doing some research regarding serverless Container as a Service (CaaS) options. Is true that Azure Container Instances is a CaaS, however it does not have the scalability that AWS ECS has.
So, I would say that is not accurate to mention that AWS ECS = Azure Container Instances, because ACI is not escalable.
I suggest to edit this: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#containers-and-container-orchestrators :
And add Azure Container Apps instead of ACI as a more accurate equivalent to AWS ECS Fargate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1,aws ecs fargate equivalent should be azure container apps hello team i ve been doing some research regarding serverless container as a service caas options is true that azure container instances is a caas however it does not have the scalability that aws ecs has so i would say that is not accurate to mention that aws ecs azure container instances because aci is not escalable i suggest to edit this and add azure container apps instead of aci as a more accurate equivalent to aws ecs fargate document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login edprice msft microsoft alias yuanzhiqu ,1
5833,13203954668.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-14 15:02:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,UseOpenIdConnectAuthentication() is obsolete,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The use of `UseOpenIdConnectAuthentication()` is obsolete. Instead `AddAuthentication()`, etc. should be used and reflected in this document.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.aspnetcore.builder.openidconnectappbuilderextensions.useopenidconnectauthentication?view=aspnetcore-2.2
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bbcd84ea-bc3e-0449-83da-3295143988be
* Version Independent ID: a7e08b3a-46f8-6eb4-961a-35fda94353c0
* Content: [Authentication in multitenant applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/authenticate)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/authenticate.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/authenticate.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"UseOpenIdConnectAuthentication() is obsolete - The use of `UseOpenIdConnectAuthentication()` is obsolete. Instead `AddAuthentication()`, etc. should be used and reflected in this document.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.aspnetcore.builder.openidconnectappbuilderextensions.useopenidconnectauthentication?view=aspnetcore-2.2
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bbcd84ea-bc3e-0449-83da-3295143988be
* Version Independent ID: a7e08b3a-46f8-6eb4-961a-35fda94353c0
* Content: [Authentication in multitenant applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/authenticate)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/authenticate.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/authenticate.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,useopenidconnectauthentication is obsolete the use of useopenidconnectauthentication is obsolete instead addauthentication etc should be used and reflected in this document document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10228,26561471743.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-20 16:12:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SRE acronym,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"The acronym SRE is used a number of times in the article, but nowhere in the page is the acronym defined.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3c9cfb32-2013-f31e-0209-d5194afc8d9e
* Version Independent ID: 9cabc767-9799-abcd-6ccd-11f164c30877
* Content: [Architecture of an AKS regulated cluster for PCI-DSS 3.2.1 - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",2.0,"SRE acronym - The acronym SRE is used a number of times in the article, but nowhere in the page is the acronym defined.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3c9cfb32-2013-f31e-0209-d5194afc8d9e
* Version Independent ID: 9cabc767-9799-abcd-6ccd-11f164c30877
* Content: [Architecture of an AKS regulated cluster for PCI-DSS 3.2.1 - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-pci/aks-pci-ra-code-assets.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",1,sre acronym the acronym sre is used a number of times in the article but nowhere in the page is the acronym defined document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id abcd content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias prwilk ,1
6034,13541105456.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 15:27:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Keys Icon is corrupted or missing,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug triaged,"
Azure_Public_Service_Icons_V2.zip\Azure_Public_Service_Icons\Security\00787-icon-service-Keys.svg is corrupted or missing.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Keys Icon is corrupted or missing -
Azure_Public_Service_Icons_V2.zip\Azure_Public_Service_Icons\Security\00787-icon-service-Keys.svg is corrupted or missing.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,keys icon is corrupted or missing azure public service icons zip azure public service icons security icon service keys svg is corrupted or missing document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5665,12960437969.0,IssuesEvent,2020-07-20 14:22:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Is there a reference implementation example for such architecture? like an ARM template or something?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author docs-experience reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"It would be great to include a sample implementation of this architecture that includes an ARM template to setup all the services, plus a simple Logic Apps workflow doing something very basic.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 58f4706b-af61-c661-279d-05e9e9abb79a
* Version Independent ID: d5a4b726-4c50-0851-edc5-04b60ee5ce89
* Content: [Enterprise integration using queues and events - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/queues-events)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/queues-events.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/queues-events.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MattFarm
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Is there a reference implementation example for such architecture? like an ARM template or something? - It would be great to include a sample implementation of this architecture that includes an ARM template to setup all the services, plus a simple Logic Apps workflow doing something very basic.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 58f4706b-af61-c661-279d-05e9e9abb79a
* Version Independent ID: d5a4b726-4c50-0851-edc5-04b60ee5ce89
* Content: [Enterprise integration using queues and events - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/queues-events)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/queues-events.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/queues-events.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MattFarm
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,is there a reference implementation example for such architecture like an arm template or something it would be great to include a sample implementation of this architecture that includes an arm template to setup all the services plus a simple logic apps workflow doing something very basic document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mattfarm microsoft alias pnp ,1
3576,9818030379.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-13 18:12:16,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Traffic Flow from Spok1 to SPoke2,architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"In the diagram below spoke-connectivity, you have NVA. With each Spoke1 & Spok2 each has a UDR to send traffic to the other VNet.
If VNet Peering doesn't allow transitive traffic. How does this traffic flow from Spok1 to Spoke 2. Is it through the internet? That is not communicated in this document.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Traffic Flow from Spok1 to SPoke2 - In the diagram below spoke-connectivity, you have NVA. With each Spoke1 & Spok2 each has a UDR to send traffic to the other VNet.
If VNet Peering doesn't allow transitive traffic. How does this traffic flow from Spok1 to Spoke 2. Is it through the internet? That is not communicated in this document.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,traffic flow from to in the diagram below spoke connectivity you have nva with each each has a udr to send traffic to the other vnet if vnet peering doesn t allow transitive traffic how does this traffic flow from to spoke is it through the internet that is not communicated in this document document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9223,24254863000.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 16:52:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Pictures are TOO small!!!,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"Could you PLEASE post the images in all articles so that you can also zoom?
Smaller always goes lately ;)
Pictures are TOO small!!! :)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b8c28146-b2a9-f734-f0f6-b1227296d7a3
* Version Independent ID: 709b2d47-6f11-88d9-6197-f0c5ca18af64
* Content: [Mining equipment monitoring - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-mining-equipment)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-mining-equipment.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-mining-equipment.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @falloutxAY
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Pictures are TOO small!!! - Could you PLEASE post the images in all articles so that you can also zoom?
Smaller always goes lately ;)
Pictures are TOO small!!! :)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b8c28146-b2a9-f734-f0f6-b1227296d7a3
* Version Independent ID: 709b2d47-6f11-88d9-6197-f0c5ca18af64
* Content: [Mining equipment monitoring - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-mining-equipment)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-mining-equipment.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/monitor-mining-equipment.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @falloutxAY
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,pictures are too small could you please post the images in all articles so that you can also zoom smaller always goes lately pictures are too small document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login falloutxay microsoft alias pnp ,1
5808,13181758361.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-12 14:47:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Syntax for link to service or URL showing up in doc,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-bug triaged,"`Paired regions
To protect an application against a regional outage, you can deploy the application across multiple regions, using [Azure Traffic Manager][traffic-manager]`
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d42fd9ae-205d-042a-4d38-4ca356e27d17
* Version Independent ID: 694c671b-430e-31b6-9133-2324bb3a2efa
* Content: [Comparing AWS and Azure regions and zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/regions-zones)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/regions-zones.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/regions-zones.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Syntax for link to service or URL showing up in doc - `Paired regions
To protect an application against a regional outage, you can deploy the application across multiple regions, using [Azure Traffic Manager][traffic-manager]`
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d42fd9ae-205d-042a-4d38-4ca356e27d17
* Version Independent ID: 694c671b-430e-31b6-9133-2324bb3a2efa
* Content: [Comparing AWS and Azure regions and zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/regions-zones)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/regions-zones.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/regions-zones.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,syntax for link to service or url showing up in doc paired regions to protect an application against a regional outage you can deploy the application across multiple regions using document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9738,25130331711.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-09 14:44:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Time Series Insight being deprecated,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Time Series Insight is mentioned as an alternative for Time Series but it is deprecated with an EOL scheduled for 2025.
Perhaps the documentation should mention this?
Cheers
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87bde15d-d343-b84d-b77f-55b8e3f12638
* Version Independent ID: 9d35a3eb-707b-47f6-68bc-3f22fee4c78c
* Content: [Time series data - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/time-series)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/time-series.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/scenarios/time-series.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Time Series Insight being deprecated -
Time Series Insight is mentioned as an alternative for Time Series but it is deprecated with an EOL scheduled for 2025.
Perhaps the documentation should mention this?
Cheers
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87bde15d-d343-b84d-b77f-55b8e3f12638
* Version Independent ID: 9d35a3eb-707b-47f6-68bc-3f22fee4c78c
* Content: [Time series data - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/time-series)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/time-series.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/scenarios/time-series.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,time series insight being deprecated time series insight is mentioned as an alternative for time series but it is deprecated with an eol scheduled for perhaps the documentation should mention this cheers document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
5375,12405389648.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-21 17:11:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,New article links return 404,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"New article links return 404
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in the Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"New article links return 404 - New article links return 404
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in the Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,new article links return new article links return document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10719,27320466511.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-24 19:19:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How do I download the slide?,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"All this is great, but a waste of time if we can't download the slide.
How? Where? Why hide this? This isn't that hard.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d6d6e5f5-f0b9-e667-45bf-806d26e48d42
* Version Independent ID: a3fa06b2-e141-c35d-6a72-a12c1ad653c1
* Content: [Integrate data with Logic App and SQL Server - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/integration/logic-apps-data-integration)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/integration/logic-apps-data-integration.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/integration/logic-apps-data-integration.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @ShantnuS
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"How do I download the slide? - All this is great, but a waste of time if we can't download the slide.
How? Where? Why hide this? This isn't that hard.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d6d6e5f5-f0b9-e667-45bf-806d26e48d42
* Version Independent ID: a3fa06b2-e141-c35d-6a72-a12c1ad653c1
* Content: [Integrate data with Logic App and SQL Server - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/integration/logic-apps-data-integration)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/integration/logic-apps-data-integration.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/integration/logic-apps-data-integration.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @ShantnuS
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,how do i download the slide all this is great but a waste of time if we can t download the slide how where why hide this this isn t that hard document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login shantnus microsoft alias pnp ,1
5985,13456176303.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-09 07:27:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The link to the MS Ignite session does not work,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"The doc links to this session - https://myignite.techcommunity.microsoft.com/sessions/81060?source=sessions but it's not available
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 09011510-4353-7237-6d31-e6451449d03f
* Version Independent ID: ac4f2053-f2a0-985a-1111-a44293192663
* Content: [Big data analytics with Azure Data Explorer - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-azure-data-explorer)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-azure-data-explorer.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-azure-data-explorer.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @orspod
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"The link to the MS Ignite session does not work - The doc links to this session - https://myignite.techcommunity.microsoft.com/sessions/81060?source=sessions but it's not available
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 09011510-4353-7237-6d31-e6451449d03f
* Version Independent ID: ac4f2053-f2a0-985a-1111-a44293192663
* Content: [Big data analytics with Azure Data Explorer - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-azure-data-explorer)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-azure-data-explorer.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/big-data-azure-data-explorer.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @orspod
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,the link to the ms ignite session does not work the doc links to this session but it s not available document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login orspod microsoft alias pnp ,1
5000,11942321131.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 20:04:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Numerous Missing Resources,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"This page appears to be missing a number of resource naming restrictions. Cross referencing the list on this page with https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/azure-best-practices/naming-and-tagging#sample-naming-convention shows a number of missing resources. I've provided some below but it's not exhaustive. If this isn't going to be centralized place for recommendations wouldn't it be better to just push the limitations back to each page's documentation?
- Azure SQL Database (numerous on this, SQL Data warehouse, MySQL, etc.)
- Cosmos DB
- Azure Search
- Azure Kubernetes Service
- Event Grid
- Log Analytics (this one isn't too hard to find, it's global but I don't know the length restriction)
- Azure Monitor specifics like action group and log alerts
The other page alone isn't enough in it's current format. For example, Cosmos DB requires the name be globally unique but on the other page it states you should name your database ""cosdb-emissions-dev"" this isn't a good recommendation as it should likely contain some random entropy to avoid name conflicts. Or at least let you know that it needs to be globally unique.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1ddc35bf-00d9-67c8-bf6a-ade5ebea07ca
* Version Independent ID: 7324a1e6-7010-c620-145b-3d8027709545
* Content: [Naming rules and restrictions for Azure resources](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/resource-naming)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @DerMar
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Numerous Missing Resources - This page appears to be missing a number of resource naming restrictions. Cross referencing the list on this page with https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cloud-adoption-framework/ready/azure-best-practices/naming-and-tagging#sample-naming-convention shows a number of missing resources. I've provided some below but it's not exhaustive. If this isn't going to be centralized place for recommendations wouldn't it be better to just push the limitations back to each page's documentation?
- Azure SQL Database (numerous on this, SQL Data warehouse, MySQL, etc.)
- Cosmos DB
- Azure Search
- Azure Kubernetes Service
- Event Grid
- Log Analytics (this one isn't too hard to find, it's global but I don't know the length restriction)
- Azure Monitor specifics like action group and log alerts
The other page alone isn't enough in it's current format. For example, Cosmos DB requires the name be globally unique but on the other page it states you should name your database ""cosdb-emissions-dev"" this isn't a good recommendation as it should likely contain some random entropy to avoid name conflicts. Or at least let you know that it needs to be globally unique.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1ddc35bf-00d9-67c8-bf6a-ade5ebea07ca
* Version Independent ID: 7324a1e6-7010-c620-145b-3d8027709545
* Content: [Naming rules and restrictions for Azure resources](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/resource-naming)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/resource-naming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @DerMar
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,numerous missing resources this page appears to be missing a number of resource naming restrictions cross referencing the list on this page with shows a number of missing resources i ve provided some below but it s not exhaustive if this isn t going to be centralized place for recommendations wouldn t it be better to just push the limitations back to each page s documentation azure sql database numerous on this sql data warehouse mysql etc cosmos db azure search azure kubernetes service event grid log analytics this one isn t too hard to find it s global but i don t know the length restriction azure monitor specifics like action group and log alerts the other page alone isn t enough in it s current format for example cosmos db requires the name be globally unique but on the other page it states you should name your database cosdb emissions dev this isn t a good recommendation as it should likely contain some random entropy to avoid name conflicts or at least let you know that it needs to be globally unique document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login dermar microsoft alias pnp ,1
4983,11939672615.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 15:32:13,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,VSDX file download for diagram,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Please provide a VSDX file download for the SVG diagram as you do for the other 3 reference architectures for web apps, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/#web-applications.
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: df354e21-f263-30a9-1a5c-1460f2bf16a9
* Version Independent ID: 73d2f19b-00a0-fe4d-7042-15d27f586565
* Content: [Web application monitoring on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"VSDX file download for diagram - Please provide a VSDX file download for the SVG diagram as you do for the other 3 reference architectures for web apps, https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/#web-applications.
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: df354e21-f263-30a9-1a5c-1460f2bf16a9
* Version Independent ID: 73d2f19b-00a0-fe4d-7042-15d27f586565
* Content: [Web application monitoring on Azure](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/app-monitoring.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,vsdx file download for diagram please provide a vsdx file download for the svg diagram as you do for the other reference architectures for web apps thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5582,12745504431.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-26 14:22:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken link,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"""Partner on-premises live encoder"" text is linked to an unavailable resource https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/media-services-live-encoders-overview
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2afdbbba-ae07-bdf4-fa21-65955f1623d1
* Version Independent ID: 189aa6c3-a454-66c1-7346-d0fe53235c25
* Content: [Live streaming digital media - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-live-stream)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-live-stream.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-live-stream.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Broken link - ""Partner on-premises live encoder"" text is linked to an unavailable resource https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/media-services-live-encoders-overview
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2afdbbba-ae07-bdf4-fa21-65955f1623d1
* Version Independent ID: 189aa6c3-a454-66c1-7346-d0fe53235c25
* Content: [Live streaming digital media - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-live-stream)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-live-stream.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/digital-media-live-stream.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,broken link partner on premises live encoder text is linked to an unavailable resource document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
4553,11340481867.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-23 06:36:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Most ""Next Steps"" links are broken",Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"Most ""Next Steps"" links are broken
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 115fe9d4-6876-b76b-c194-6dbe760f0131
* Version Independent ID: bd2dbb27-a069-8609-5421-33d223df06eb
* Content: [Dev-Test deployment for testing IaaS solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Most ""Next Steps"" links are broken - Most ""Next Steps"" links are broken
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 115fe9d4-6876-b76b-c194-6dbe760f0131
* Version Independent ID: bd2dbb27-a069-8609-5421-33d223df06eb
* Content: [Dev-Test deployment for testing IaaS solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-iaas.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,most next steps links are broken most next steps links are broken document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
4981,11938200008.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 13:26:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Provide guidance for Bot framework generate/token API,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-idea triaged,"Using it in a middleware server that hides the SECRET and other security, however, during a team test, the middleware invokes back-to-back requests for a token too quickly and then gets put in the penalty box. Need a way to design around such that the end-consumer of the token does not get blocked.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Provide guidance for Bot framework generate/token API - Using it in a middleware server that hides the SECRET and other security, however, during a team test, the middleware invokes back-to-back requests for a token too quickly and then gets put in the penalty box. Need a way to design around such that the end-consumer of the token does not get blocked.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,provide guidance for bot framework generate token api using it in a middleware server that hides the secret and other security however during a team test the middleware invokes back to back requests for a token too quickly and then gets put in the penalty box need a way to design around such that the end consumer of the token does not get blocked document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10711,27316363478.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-24 16:00:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Guidance needs updating due to product deprecation,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"I realize I'm nitpicking a little, but I would like to see this page updated to remove reference to DC/OS.
DC/OS has been end of life'd as of 10/31/21 per https://d2iq.com/products/dcos.
Perhaps replace it with a reference to Hashicorp Nomad?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 93139ee2-ff91-ee5e-a056-8d6b597a81f3
* Version Independent ID: 8b4436e0-094c-9602-2ead-43bb3b2f98f1
* Content: [Choose a compute option for microservices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/compute-options)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/compute-options.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/microservices/design/compute-options.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Guidance needs updating due to product deprecation - I realize I'm nitpicking a little, but I would like to see this page updated to remove reference to DC/OS.
DC/OS has been end of life'd as of 10/31/21 per https://d2iq.com/products/dcos.
Perhaps replace it with a reference to Hashicorp Nomad?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 93139ee2-ff91-ee5e-a056-8d6b597a81f3
* Version Independent ID: 8b4436e0-094c-9602-2ead-43bb3b2f98f1
* Content: [Choose a compute option for microservices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/compute-options)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/compute-options.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/microservices/design/compute-options.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,guidance needs updating due to product deprecation i realize i m nitpicking a little but i would like to see this page updated to remove reference to dc os dc os has been end of life d as of per perhaps replace it with a reference to hashicorp nomad document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
6563,14889844779.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-20 22:03:01,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,HDInsight has got autoscale since this article was published,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"
Looks like the text and matrix are outdated when it comes to autoscale features being available for the different technology. since it's over a year old, there might be more inaccuracies. here's the info for autoscale on HDI.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/hdinsight/hdinsight-autoscale-clusters
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bba35cbb-4160-0b5d-6829-103b25ad6ce9
* Version Independent ID: fa12ea8e-401a-9567-7b35-ffff532a99b6
* Content: [Choosing a batch processing technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"HDInsight has got autoscale since this article was published -
Looks like the text and matrix are outdated when it comes to autoscale features being available for the different technology. since it's over a year old, there might be more inaccuracies. here's the info for autoscale on HDI.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/hdinsight/hdinsight-autoscale-clusters
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bba35cbb-4160-0b5d-6829-103b25ad6ce9
* Version Independent ID: fa12ea8e-401a-9567-7b35-ffff532a99b6
* Content: [Choosing a batch processing technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,hdinsight has got autoscale since this article was published looks like the text and matrix are outdated when it comes to autoscale features being available for the different technology since it s over a year old there might be more inaccuracies here s the info for autoscale on hdi document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
9767,25166576793.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 21:27:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incorrect Use of HTTP Status Code in the documentation of Request-Reply Pattern,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"
> The client sends an HTTP GET request to the status endpoint. The work is still pending, so this call also returns HTTP 202.
The statement of the above paragraph seen in the document doesn't seem match the diagram on top of this paragraph. The diagram shows HTTP 200 whereas the statement says HTTP 202 with regarding to the access of the status endpoint.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @WillEastbury
* Microsoft Alias: **wieastbu**",1.0,"Incorrect Use of HTTP Status Code in the documentation of Request-Reply Pattern -
> The client sends an HTTP GET request to the status endpoint. The work is still pending, so this call also returns HTTP 202.
The statement of the above paragraph seen in the document doesn't seem match the diagram on top of this paragraph. The diagram shows HTTP 200 whereas the statement says HTTP 202 with regarding to the access of the status endpoint.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @WillEastbury
* Microsoft Alias: **wieastbu**",1,incorrect use of http status code in the documentation of request reply pattern the client sends an http get request to the status endpoint the work is still pending so this call also returns http the statement of the above paragraph seen in the document doesn t seem match the diagram on top of this paragraph the diagram shows http whereas the statement says http with regarding to the access of the status endpoint document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login willeastbury microsoft alias wieastbu ,1
5863,13234645660.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-18 16:38:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Wrong tense of word ""increases"" in ""Limits"" Section",Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged well-architected/subsvc,"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/app-design#limits
The sentence that reads, ""Some limits are a hard maximum, while others are a soft limit that can be increases upon request..."" should read ""Some limits are a hard maximum, while others are a soft limit that can be increased upon request...""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b5d9240-7176-838b-5a41-1159799e4456
* Version Independent ID: e38a4b5c-32b1-d6bc-56b3-c8a84def4471
* Content: [Application design for DevOps - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/app-design)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/app-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/app-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @UmarMohamedUsman
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Wrong tense of word ""increases"" in ""Limits"" Section - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/app-design#limits
The sentence that reads, ""Some limits are a hard maximum, while others are a soft limit that can be increases upon request..."" should read ""Some limits are a hard maximum, while others are a soft limit that can be increased upon request...""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b5d9240-7176-838b-5a41-1159799e4456
* Version Independent ID: e38a4b5c-32b1-d6bc-56b3-c8a84def4471
* Content: [Application design for DevOps - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/app-design)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/app-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/app-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @UmarMohamedUsman
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,wrong tense of word increases in limits section the sentence that reads some limits are a hard maximum while others are a soft limit that can be increases upon request should read some limits are a hard maximum while others are a soft limit that can be increased upon request document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login umarmohamedusman microsoft alias pnp ,1
5889,13249278460.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-19 20:30:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure storage examples using legacy version,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement enhancement triaged,"Hi,
In the section Azure Storage, the examples provided apply to the legacy version 11 of Azure Storage library.
Is it possible to provide examples for the latest version (v12)?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#azure-storage)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure storage examples using legacy version - Hi,
In the section Azure Storage, the examples provided apply to the legacy version 11 of Azure Storage library.
Is it possible to provide examples for the latest version (v12)?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#azure-storage)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure storage examples using legacy version hi in the section azure storage the examples provided apply to the legacy version of azure storage library is it possible to provide examples for the latest version document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4629,11464300331.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-07 17:45:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Swap numbers,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug needs-art triaged,"Hi, please swap bullet 7 and 8 in the Data Flow as they are currently incorrect
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f4aaadeb-76bf-55bf-0d25-92e50a05145a
* Version Independent ID: 476a24c1-7109-cb35-0a4e-31b5320b4906
* Content: [Custom Mobile Workforce App - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/custom-mobile-workforce-app#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-mobile-workforce-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-mobile-workforce-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Swap numbers - Hi, please swap bullet 7 and 8 in the Data Flow as they are currently incorrect
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f4aaadeb-76bf-55bf-0d25-92e50a05145a
* Version Independent ID: 476a24c1-7109-cb35-0a4e-31b5320b4906
* Content: [Custom Mobile Workforce App - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/custom-mobile-workforce-app#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-mobile-workforce-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-mobile-workforce-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,swap numbers hi please swap bullet and in the data flow as they are currently incorrect document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5723,13050641050.0,IssuesEvent,2020-07-29 15:48:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Update ""Publishing internal APIs to external consumers"" page with newer Azure services (e.g., Front Door)",Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement example-scenario/subsvc triaged,"I think it would be great to update the reference architecture on the ""Publishing internal APIs to external consumers"" page with newer Azure services such as Azure Front Door, and perhaps changing the API App icon to a Web App icon (since I am under the impression that the API App concept is being merged into Web Apps).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/publish-internal-apis-externally
Also, it would be great to add a description around why the multiple layers of virtual networks are recommended as shown in the diagram for the specific situation that is assumed.
I wouldn't mind helping update this diagram, but would like to work with someone from Microsoft who has ownership around this page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fb14c845-07c9-0fe2-0108-119b7e913b35
* Version Independent ID: c3fdc7ba-6743-33a6-d41d-3328e2e22e93
* Content: [Publishing internal APIs to external users - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/publish-internal-apis-externally?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/publish-internal-apis-externally.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/publish-internal-apis-externally.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @ssarwa
* Microsoft Alias: **ssarwa**",1.0,"Update ""Publishing internal APIs to external consumers"" page with newer Azure services (e.g., Front Door) - I think it would be great to update the reference architecture on the ""Publishing internal APIs to external consumers"" page with newer Azure services such as Azure Front Door, and perhaps changing the API App icon to a Web App icon (since I am under the impression that the API App concept is being merged into Web Apps).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/publish-internal-apis-externally
Also, it would be great to add a description around why the multiple layers of virtual networks are recommended as shown in the diagram for the specific situation that is assumed.
I wouldn't mind helping update this diagram, but would like to work with someone from Microsoft who has ownership around this page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fb14c845-07c9-0fe2-0108-119b7e913b35
* Version Independent ID: c3fdc7ba-6743-33a6-d41d-3328e2e22e93
* Content: [Publishing internal APIs to external users - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/publish-internal-apis-externally?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/publish-internal-apis-externally.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/publish-internal-apis-externally.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @ssarwa
* Microsoft Alias: **ssarwa**",1,update publishing internal apis to external consumers page with newer azure services e g front door i think it would be great to update the reference architecture on the publishing internal apis to external consumers page with newer azure services such as azure front door and perhaps changing the api app icon to a web app icon since i am under the impression that the api app concept is being merged into web apps also it would be great to add a description around why the multiple layers of virtual networks are recommended as shown in the diagram for the specific situation that is assumed i wouldn t mind helping update this diagram but would like to work with someone from microsoft who has ownership around this page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login ssarwa microsoft alias ssarwa ,1
4884,11800364140.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-18 17:24:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,menu on right hand side is blocking the architecture diagram view,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Whenever the architecture diagram is lengthy, the right hand side menu (is this page helpful? and in this article) are blocking the diagram view while scrolling up.
Thanks,
Ravi
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2ac60d9e-b851-afa6-beeb-74cdaa2a9146
* Version Independent ID: e300615f-1b32-df63-bc89-54b3b17dced5
* Content: [Modern Data Warehouse Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"menu on right hand side is blocking the architecture diagram view - Whenever the architecture diagram is lengthy, the right hand side menu (is this page helpful? and in this article) are blocking the diagram view while scrolling up.
Thanks,
Ravi
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2ac60d9e-b851-afa6-beeb-74cdaa2a9146
* Version Independent ID: e300615f-1b32-df63-bc89-54b3b17dced5
* Content: [Modern Data Warehouse Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,menu on right hand side is blocking the architecture diagram view whenever the architecture diagram is lengthy the right hand side menu is this page helpful and in this article are blocking the diagram view while scrolling up thanks ravi document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id beeb version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
11290,29811614185.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-16 15:28:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""The solution"" = ""This article""?",assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
Please check the page here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/manufacturing/teamcenter-plm-netapp-files
The beginning of the first sentence sounds confusing: ""**The solution** demonstrates how to use [Azure NetApp Files](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-introduction) as a storage solution for Siemens Teamcenter product lifecycle management (PLM).""
Could it rather be ""**This article** demonstrates how to use [Azure NetApp Files](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-introduction) as a storage solution for Siemens Teamcenter product lifecycle management (PLM)."" ?
Best regards,
François
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 29a0e1ee-1e2a-9e03-db3f-904ce0b382de
* Version Independent ID: 29a0e1ee-1e2a-9e03-db3f-904ce0b382de
* Content: [Use Teamcenter PLM with Azure NetApp Files - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/manufacturing/teamcenter-plm-netapp-files)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/manufacturing/teamcenter-plm-netapp-files.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/manufacturing/teamcenter-plm-netapp-files.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @gvanteylingen
* Microsoft Alias: **b-gevant**",1.0,"""The solution"" = ""This article""? -
Please check the page here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/manufacturing/teamcenter-plm-netapp-files
The beginning of the first sentence sounds confusing: ""**The solution** demonstrates how to use [Azure NetApp Files](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-introduction) as a storage solution for Siemens Teamcenter product lifecycle management (PLM).""
Could it rather be ""**This article** demonstrates how to use [Azure NetApp Files](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-netapp-files/azure-netapp-files-introduction) as a storage solution for Siemens Teamcenter product lifecycle management (PLM)."" ?
Best regards,
François
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 29a0e1ee-1e2a-9e03-db3f-904ce0b382de
* Version Independent ID: 29a0e1ee-1e2a-9e03-db3f-904ce0b382de
* Content: [Use Teamcenter PLM with Azure NetApp Files - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/manufacturing/teamcenter-plm-netapp-files)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/manufacturing/teamcenter-plm-netapp-files.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/manufacturing/teamcenter-plm-netapp-files.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @gvanteylingen
* Microsoft Alias: **b-gevant**",1, the solution this article please check the page here the beginning of the first sentence sounds confusing the solution demonstrates how to use as a storage solution for siemens teamcenter product lifecycle management plm could it rather be this article demonstrates how to use as a storage solution for siemens teamcenter product lifecycle management plm best regards françois document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login gvanteylingen microsoft alias b gevant ,1
3890,10239951842.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 19:33:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Data Gateway,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Why is there no mention of the on-premises data gateway in this architecture? My thinking is this is a key piece of the architecture and allows cloud-based systems to be integrated with on-premises systems.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 287bb9a4-a404-f75b-9bf5-ebd445245938
* Version Independent ID: 31d58fc1-cc2a-5458-ab0b-82b42d7697b2
* Content: [Basic enterprise integration using Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/basic-enterprise-integration#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/basic-enterprise-integration.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/basic-enterprise-integration.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MattFarm
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Data Gateway - Why is there no mention of the on-premises data gateway in this architecture? My thinking is this is a key piece of the architecture and allows cloud-based systems to be integrated with on-premises systems.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 287bb9a4-a404-f75b-9bf5-ebd445245938
* Version Independent ID: 31d58fc1-cc2a-5458-ab0b-82b42d7697b2
* Content: [Basic enterprise integration using Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/basic-enterprise-integration#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/basic-enterprise-integration.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/enterprise-integration/basic-enterprise-integration.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MattFarm
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,data gateway why is there no mention of the on premises data gateway in this architecture my thinking is this is a key piece of the architecture and allows cloud based systems to be integrated with on premises systems document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mattfarm microsoft alias pnp ,1
4140,10597481777.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-10 00:49:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Handling exceptions > Capture exceptions and return a meaningful response to clients > DeleteCustomer - 400 may not be right one?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"In Topic:Handling exceptions
Section:Capture exceptions and return a meaningful response to clients
Can you add an explanation of scenarios that could lead to BadRequest(Strings.CustomerNotDeleted)?
// Remove the customer from the repository
// The DeleteCustomer method returns true if the customer
// was successfully deleted
if (repository.DeleteCustomer(id))
{
// Return a response message with status code 204 (No Content)
// To indicate that the operation was successful
return StatusCode(HttpStatusCode.NoContent);
}
else
{
// Otherwise return a 400 (Bad Request) error response
return BadRequest(Strings.CustomerNotDeleted);
}
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 329fde76-a838-59c9-73f6-96424c03a6e0
* Version Independent ID: 203cd155-00c5-286b-96ce-5961c24c6273
* Content: [API implementation guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-implementation)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-implementation.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/api-implementation.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Handling exceptions > Capture exceptions and return a meaningful response to clients > DeleteCustomer - 400 may not be right one? - In Topic:Handling exceptions
Section:Capture exceptions and return a meaningful response to clients
Can you add an explanation of scenarios that could lead to BadRequest(Strings.CustomerNotDeleted)?
// Remove the customer from the repository
// The DeleteCustomer method returns true if the customer
// was successfully deleted
if (repository.DeleteCustomer(id))
{
// Return a response message with status code 204 (No Content)
// To indicate that the operation was successful
return StatusCode(HttpStatusCode.NoContent);
}
else
{
// Otherwise return a 400 (Bad Request) error response
return BadRequest(Strings.CustomerNotDeleted);
}
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 329fde76-a838-59c9-73f6-96424c03a6e0
* Version Independent ID: 203cd155-00c5-286b-96ce-5961c24c6273
* Content: [API implementation guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-implementation)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-implementation.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/api-implementation.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,handling exceptions capture exceptions and return a meaningful response to clients deletecustomer may not be right one in topic handling exceptions section capture exceptions and return a meaningful response to clients can you add an explanation of scenarios that could lead to badrequest strings customernotdeleted remove the customer from the repository the deletecustomer method returns true if the customer was successfully deleted if repository deletecustomer id return a response message with status code no content to indicate that the operation was successful return statuscode httpstatuscode nocontent else otherwise return a bad request error response return badrequest strings customernotdeleted document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5556,12700144614.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 15:52:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Include Azure Data Explorer in this pattern,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Azure Data Explorer is part of the new real-time analytics pattern which is not reflected on this page. Please add it and ping me if you have any questions. - maraheja@microsoft.com
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Include Azure Data Explorer in this pattern - Azure Data Explorer is part of the new real-time analytics pattern which is not reflected on this page. Please add it and ping me if you have any questions. - maraheja@microsoft.com
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b4bb287-fa40-af1d-0af9-e8bc30cfb33e
* Version Independent ID: 12ab4c06-2e95-bb73-f62a-2d1eb79bc735
* Content: [Real Time Analytics on Big Data Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-analytics.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,include azure data explorer in this pattern azure data explorer is part of the new real time analytics pattern which is not reflected on this page please add it and ping me if you have any questions maraheja microsoft com document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10220,26543602776.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-19 21:33:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Nice explanation,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
Thanks for sharing such a wonderful article on how to do forecasting at scale using R. Might be some more detailed explanation can be provided for beginners and a video tutorial also can supplement this
Regards,
Arun Rajesh B.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cab154f6-58af-5834-ae23-9824b21541e0
* Version Independent ID: bb8941b3-59fd-fae3-0cbb-f8c0307de62e
* Content: [Batch scoring with R models to forecast sales - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-r-models)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-R-models.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-R-models.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Nice explanation -
[Enter feedback here]
Thanks for sharing such a wonderful article on how to do forecasting at scale using R. Might be some more detailed explanation can be provided for beginners and a video tutorial also can supplement this
Regards,
Arun Rajesh B.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cab154f6-58af-5834-ae23-9824b21541e0
* Version Independent ID: bb8941b3-59fd-fae3-0cbb-f8c0307de62e
* Content: [Batch scoring with R models to forecast sales - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-r-models)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-R-models.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/batch-scoring-R-models.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,nice explanation thanks for sharing such a wonderful article on how to do forecasting at scale using r might be some more detailed explanation can be provided for beginners and a video tutorial also can supplement this regards arun rajesh b document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login njray microsoft alias pnp ,1
5589,12746712081.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-26 16:27:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Use of Azure Cosmos DB bulk executor library,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc triaged,"Would be a great benefit to add the usage of [Azure Cosmos DB bulk executor library](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/bulk-executor-overview).
""It significantly reduces the client-side compute resources needed to saturate the throughput allocated to a container. A single threaded application that writes data using the bulk import API achieves 10 times greater write throughput when compared to a multi-threaded application that writes data in parallel while saturating the client machine's CPU.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8baf8aa0-ab4c-0731-a1b9-742953f8a791
* Version Independent ID: 7d2dacc0-9fc9-83b0-7a0f-049006024279
* Content: [Performance tuning - Event streaming with Azure Functions - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/performance/event-streaming)
* Content Source: [docs/performance/event-streaming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/performance/event-streaming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Use of Azure Cosmos DB bulk executor library - Would be a great benefit to add the usage of [Azure Cosmos DB bulk executor library](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/bulk-executor-overview).
""It significantly reduces the client-side compute resources needed to saturate the throughput allocated to a container. A single threaded application that writes data using the bulk import API achieves 10 times greater write throughput when compared to a multi-threaded application that writes data in parallel while saturating the client machine's CPU.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8baf8aa0-ab4c-0731-a1b9-742953f8a791
* Version Independent ID: 7d2dacc0-9fc9-83b0-7a0f-049006024279
* Content: [Performance tuning - Event streaming with Azure Functions - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/performance/event-streaming)
* Content Source: [docs/performance/event-streaming.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/performance/event-streaming.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,use of azure cosmos db bulk executor library would be a great benefit to add the usage of it significantly reduces the client side compute resources needed to saturate the throughput allocated to a container a single threaded application that writes data using the bulk import api achieves times greater write throughput when compared to a multi threaded application that writes data in parallel while saturating the client machine s cpu document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
11530,30822322269.0,IssuesEvent,2023-08-01 17:15:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Error in Ingress Traffic Diagram,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"The ingress flow [diagram ](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#deploy-ingress-resources) is missing the internal load balancer component. This causes confusion and also means the elements referenced in the detailed flow description below the diagram are incorrect.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Error in Ingress Traffic Diagram - The ingress flow [diagram ](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#deploy-ingress-resources) is missing the internal load balancer component. This causes confusion and also means the elements referenced in the detailed flow description below the diagram are incorrect.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,error in ingress traffic diagram the ingress flow is missing the internal load balancer component this causes confusion and also means the elements referenced in the detailed flow description below the diagram are incorrect document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9761,25165591675.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 20:31:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The behavior of this command has been altered by the following extension: aks-preview,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3af2f117-85b5-b53e-b9b8-58c43a0aac71
* Version Independent ID: 0640e0e2-04d8-e056-78e8-977bb7a559dc
* Content: [AKS triage container registry connectivity - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-triage-container-registry)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-triage-container-registry.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-triage-container-registry.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @kevingbb
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"The behavior of this command has been altered by the following extension: aks-preview -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3af2f117-85b5-b53e-b9b8-58c43a0aac71
* Version Independent ID: 0640e0e2-04d8-e056-78e8-977bb7a559dc
* Content: [AKS triage container registry connectivity - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-triage-container-registry)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-triage-container-registry.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-triage-container-registry.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @kevingbb
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,the behavior of this command has been altered by the following extension aks preview document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login kevingbb microsoft alias architectures ,1
11006,27740631768.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-15 14:07:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Async IO Mitigating risk of blocked threads,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"The docs state `Eventually resources such as memory, connections, and threads could be exhausted, preventing other users from connecting to the system`. However, isn't this issue significantly mitigated assuming we're using async IO? I can't think how connections and threads could be ""exhausted"" if we're using async IO.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 16660c68-2989-3b3b-21cb-1cf0d325070e
* Version Independent ID: e65d705e-3a0a-9ea9-382e-1ed25a704fb7
* Content: [Circuit Breaker pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/circuit-breaker)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/circuit-breaker.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/circuit-breaker.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Async IO Mitigating risk of blocked threads - The docs state `Eventually resources such as memory, connections, and threads could be exhausted, preventing other users from connecting to the system`. However, isn't this issue significantly mitigated assuming we're using async IO? I can't think how connections and threads could be ""exhausted"" if we're using async IO.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 16660c68-2989-3b3b-21cb-1cf0d325070e
* Version Independent ID: e65d705e-3a0a-9ea9-382e-1ed25a704fb7
* Content: [Circuit Breaker pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/circuit-breaker)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/circuit-breaker.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/circuit-breaker.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,async io mitigating risk of blocked threads the docs state eventually resources such as memory connections and threads could be exhausted preventing other users from connecting to the system however isn t this issue significantly mitigated assuming we re using async io i can t think how connections and threads could be exhausted if we re using async io document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11156,28142204831.0,IssuesEvent,2023-04-02 03:39:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,It isnt clear how ,duplicate cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"From the article:
""Use asynchronous parallel processing. If an operation requires multiple steps that are performed asynchronously (such as remote service calls), you might be able to call them in parallel, and then aggregate the results. This approach assumes that each step does not depend on the results of the previous step.""
It isn't clear to me how this helps with minimizing coordination - I do understand that the parallel call approach is efficient but it is also more complex than serial calls. I may be missing something that the author wanted to convey - do look into this and see if an update might help clarify this.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: de5c202d-cbea-a99e-c9c0-d4688121d797
* Version Independent ID: 712375b6-5116-f734-3bcc-0466184ec885
* Content: [Minimize coordination - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/design-principles/minimize-coordination)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/design-principles/minimize-coordination.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/design-principles/minimize-coordination.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"It isnt clear how - From the article:
""Use asynchronous parallel processing. If an operation requires multiple steps that are performed asynchronously (such as remote service calls), you might be able to call them in parallel, and then aggregate the results. This approach assumes that each step does not depend on the results of the previous step.""
It isn't clear to me how this helps with minimizing coordination - I do understand that the parallel call approach is efficient but it is also more complex than serial calls. I may be missing something that the author wanted to convey - do look into this and see if an update might help clarify this.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: de5c202d-cbea-a99e-c9c0-d4688121d797
* Version Independent ID: 712375b6-5116-f734-3bcc-0466184ec885
* Content: [Minimize coordination - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/design-principles/minimize-coordination)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/design-principles/minimize-coordination.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/design-principles/minimize-coordination.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,it isnt clear how from the article use asynchronous parallel processing if an operation requires multiple steps that are performed asynchronously such as remote service calls you might be able to call them in parallel and then aggregate the results this approach assumes that each step does not depend on the results of the previous step it isn t clear to me how this helps with minimizing coordination i do understand that the parallel call approach is efficient but it is also more complex than serial calls i may be missing something that the author wanted to convey do look into this and see if an update might help clarify this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id cbea version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login martinekuan microsoft alias pnp ,1
5926,13303376114.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-25 15:26:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing icons,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"The IoT Icon set is woefully incomplete.
At a minimum the following services are missing:
- IoT Hub
- IoT DPS
- IoT Edge
- Azure Sphere
- Azure RTOS
- Azure Digital Twins
- Azure Time Series Insights
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing icons - The IoT Icon set is woefully incomplete.
At a minimum the following services are missing:
- IoT Hub
- IoT DPS
- IoT Edge
- Azure Sphere
- Azure RTOS
- Azure Digital Twins
- Azure Time Series Insights
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing icons the iot icon set is woefully incomplete at a minimum the following services are missing iot hub iot dps iot edge azure sphere azure rtos azure digital twins azure time series insights document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10903,27450245411.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-02 16:52:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Why move old records from Cosmos DB to Data Lake?,cxp assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"You wrote, ""The records don't need to stay in Azure Cosmos DB indefinitely. Older deliveries can be archived — say, after a month.""
Please elaborate on why one would move old records from Cosmos DB to Data Lake. Is Data Lake storage less expensive? Is analysis less expensive in Data Lake? Does Data Lake have features lacking or less convenient in Cosmos DB?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: eb25545c-958f-99b0-b321-74e556ad4557
* Version Independent ID: ebe36da6-a15f-f981-787d-8aa4307451a2
* Content: [Data considerations for microservices - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/data-considerations)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/data-considerations.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/microservices/design/data-considerations.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Why move old records from Cosmos DB to Data Lake? - You wrote, ""The records don't need to stay in Azure Cosmos DB indefinitely. Older deliveries can be archived — say, after a month.""
Please elaborate on why one would move old records from Cosmos DB to Data Lake. Is Data Lake storage less expensive? Is analysis less expensive in Data Lake? Does Data Lake have features lacking or less convenient in Cosmos DB?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: eb25545c-958f-99b0-b321-74e556ad4557
* Version Independent ID: ebe36da6-a15f-f981-787d-8aa4307451a2
* Content: [Data considerations for microservices - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/design/data-considerations)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/design/data-considerations.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/microservices/design/data-considerations.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,why move old records from cosmos db to data lake you wrote the records don t need to stay in azure cosmos db indefinitely older deliveries can be archived — say after a month please elaborate on why one would move old records from cosmos db to data lake is data lake storage less expensive is analysis less expensive in data lake does data lake have features lacking or less convenient in cosmos db document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
11081,27968751982.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 22:31:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Analytics Compute is missing,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Analytics Compute Services such as Synapse Spark Pools and Databricks are unfortunately not considered in the decision tree, even though they are very valid targets for some very huge compute workloads. I would suggest to include them in the tree or mentioned that this is thought for OLTP kind of compute only.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Analytics Compute is missing -
Analytics Compute Services such as Synapse Spark Pools and Databricks are unfortunately not considered in the decision tree, even though they are very valid targets for some very huge compute workloads. I would suggest to include them in the tree or mentioned that this is thought for OLTP kind of compute only.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,analytics compute is missing analytics compute services such as synapse spark pools and databricks are unfortunately not considered in the decision tree even though they are very valid targets for some very huge compute workloads i would suggest to include them in the tree or mentioned that this is thought for oltp kind of compute only document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
10231,26561808433.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-20 16:28:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please give me java example ,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri1 design-pattern/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
The example for this page is only for .Net do you have example for Java as well?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Please give me java example -
[Enter feedback here]
The example for this page is only for .Net do you have example for Java as well?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,please give me java example the example for this page is only for net do you have example for java as well document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
3891,10239962435.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 19:35:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Notebooks,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Would be good to include a reference to Azure Notebooks on this page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d0bdc71b-0a54-4cc4-1b79-f60e274e9a51
* Version Independent ID: 1783570c-3545-71c8-72d3-d5657f77c070
* Content: [Choosing a machine learning technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning?toc=%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Fmachine-learning%2Ftoc.json&bc=%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Fbread%2Ftoc.json)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Notebooks - Would be good to include a reference to Azure Notebooks on this page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d0bdc71b-0a54-4cc4-1b79-f60e274e9a51
* Version Independent ID: 1783570c-3545-71c8-72d3-d5657f77c070
* Content: [Choosing a machine learning technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning?toc=%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Fmachine-learning%2Ftoc.json&bc=%2Fen-us%2Fazure%2Fbread%2Ftoc.json)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/data-science-and-machine-learning.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure notebooks would be good to include a reference to azure notebooks on this page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6138,13781476722.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-08 16:13:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Spelling correction needed,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement example-scenario/subsvc triaged,"
Under the **Alternatives** section, first bullet point has 'considrered' misspelled and needs updating to 'considered'
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5f10895e-4e1d-1cdd-2d57-32880e0cc45a
* Version Independent ID: 3518d0a5-ffd1-dfa7-6d6b-de2a9ef170d6
* Content: [Azure data platform end-to-end - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @fabragaMS
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Spelling correction needed -
Under the **Alternatives** section, first bullet point has 'considrered' misspelled and needs updating to 'considered'
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5f10895e-4e1d-1cdd-2d57-32880e0cc45a
* Version Independent ID: 3518d0a5-ffd1-dfa7-6d6b-de2a9ef170d6
* Content: [Azure data platform end-to-end - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/dataplate2e/data-platform-end-to-end.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @fabragaMS
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,spelling correction needed under the alternatives section first bullet point has considrered misspelled and needs updating to considered thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login fabragams microsoft alias pnp ,1
9091,24037052073.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 20:14:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,suitable store for storing large datasets of CSV files that also support parallel operations?,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"
What might be a suitable store for storing large datasets of CSV files that also support parallel operations?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5ac957c-9568-b3f0-d79e-72a36439bee9
* Version Independent ID: e89413dd-8815-3d38-d7f0-6a6d0268db1e
* Content: [Processing CSV and JSON files - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"suitable store for storing large datasets of CSV files that also support parallel operations? -
What might be a suitable store for storing large datasets of CSV files that also support parallel operations?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5ac957c-9568-b3f0-d79e-72a36439bee9
* Version Independent ID: e89413dd-8815-3d38-d7f0-6a6d0268db1e
* Content: [Processing CSV and JSON files - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/scenarios/csv-and-json.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,suitable store for storing large datasets of csv files that also support parallel operations what might be a suitable store for storing large datasets of csv files that also support parallel operations document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
7679,18840152729.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-11 08:35:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incomplete Choose Candidate Workflow for Lift+Shift Containerised Decision path,cxp triaged architecture-center/svc azure-guide/subsvc,"When following the Lift+Shift -> Can it be Containerised -> No Path I found this somewhat unclear/confusing and needing clarification.
Can it be Containerised = No
- we are already in a path of it can't be containerised;
- however the next decision point is ""COTS App that can't be containerised"" then land this as install COTS on VM;
- the catchall alternative path is App Service; is this making assuming that it is a web/http app which may not be the case?
Should there be additional decision point for App Service or VM depending on this?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Incomplete Choose Candidate Workflow for Lift+Shift Containerised Decision path - When following the Lift+Shift -> Can it be Containerised -> No Path I found this somewhat unclear/confusing and needing clarification.
Can it be Containerised = No
- we are already in a path of it can't be containerised;
- however the next decision point is ""COTS App that can't be containerised"" then land this as install COTS on VM;
- the catchall alternative path is App Service; is this making assuming that it is a web/http app which may not be the case?
Should there be additional decision point for App Service or VM depending on this?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,incomplete choose candidate workflow for lift shift containerised decision path when following the lift shift can it be containerised no path i found this somewhat unclear confusing and needing clarification can it be containerised no we are already in a path of it can t be containerised however the next decision point is cots app that can t be containerised then land this as install cots on vm the catchall alternative path is app service is this making assuming that it is a web http app which may not be the case should there be additional decision point for app service or vm depending on this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11029,27803955819.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-17 18:04:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,aPaaS is not a well used term,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
I have never heard aPaaS ever mentioned in Azure before (or any cloud computing contect).
I think it would be much clearer to the reader if you used SaaS - that is how I hear all internal Microsoft and external people describe IoT central.
If you think it doesn't quite count as SaaS you should link to what Microsoft means when it describes something as aPaaS rather than PaaS as I don't think anywhere else in Microsoft uses that term?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30009d60-b907-fa0d-b2f9-a6dd7e414259
* Version Independent ID: 377f9495-ed09-bd1f-2f62-58007097d338
* Content: [Choose an Internet of Things (IoT) solution in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot/iot-central-iot-hub-cheat-sheet)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/iot/iot-central-iot-hub-cheat-sheet.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/iot/iot-central-iot-hub-cheat-sheet.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"aPaaS is not a well used term -
I have never heard aPaaS ever mentioned in Azure before (or any cloud computing contect).
I think it would be much clearer to the reader if you used SaaS - that is how I hear all internal Microsoft and external people describe IoT central.
If you think it doesn't quite count as SaaS you should link to what Microsoft means when it describes something as aPaaS rather than PaaS as I don't think anywhere else in Microsoft uses that term?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30009d60-b907-fa0d-b2f9-a6dd7e414259
* Version Independent ID: 377f9495-ed09-bd1f-2f62-58007097d338
* Content: [Choose an Internet of Things (IoT) solution in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot/iot-central-iot-hub-cheat-sheet)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/iot/iot-central-iot-hub-cheat-sheet.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/iot/iot-central-iot-hub-cheat-sheet.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,apaas is not a well used term i have never heard apaas ever mentioned in azure before or any cloud computing contect i think it would be much clearer to the reader if you used saas that is how i hear all internal microsoft and external people describe iot central if you think it doesn t quite count as saas you should link to what microsoft means when it describes something as apaas rather than paas as i don t think anywhere else in microsoft uses that term document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
3884,10239413235.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:11:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,TokenCache is changed to sealed,architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"In latest version of ADAL library, TokenCache is changed to sealed while this document still uses inheritance to support distributed cache
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab204a8d-c451-ef99-6610-139a0dee61ac
* Version Independent ID: 23a69ae2-70bc-aab5-bbe1-e9699d57558b
* Content: [Cache access tokens in a multitenant application](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/token-cache#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"TokenCache is changed to sealed - In latest version of ADAL library, TokenCache is changed to sealed while this document still uses inheritance to support distributed cache
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab204a8d-c451-ef99-6610-139a0dee61ac
* Version Independent ID: 23a69ae2-70bc-aab5-bbe1-e9699d57558b
* Content: [Cache access tokens in a multitenant application](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/token-cache#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/token-cache.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,tokencache is changed to sealed in latest version of adal library tokencache is changed to sealed while this document still uses inheritance to support distributed cache document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
5813,13188789748.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-13 07:14:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Spelling on region 2 is incorrect!!,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug needs-art reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 297fe58b-8232-9b2a-c92e-9f7f94ec3e4e
* Version Independent ID: 3da45f17-e475-f23e-c77f-465933ed02f4
* Content: [Run SAP HANA on Azure (Large Instances) - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @BenTrin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Spelling on region 2 is incorrect!! -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 297fe58b-8232-9b2a-c92e-9f7f94ec3e4e
* Version Independent ID: 3da45f17-e475-f23e-c77f-465933ed02f4
* Content: [Run SAP HANA on Azure (Large Instances) - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @BenTrin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,spelling on region is incorrect document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login bentrin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5436,12497985786.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:27:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Implementation details,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"It would be great if we get a detail step by step implementation details on how to do this. Specially updated with the newest options of technologies, data stores, etc.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2ac60d9e-b851-afa6-beeb-74cdaa2a9146
* Version Independent ID: e300615f-1b32-df63-bc89-54b3b17dced5
* Content: [Modern Data Warehouse Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Implementation details - It would be great if we get a detail step by step implementation details on how to do this. Specially updated with the newest options of technologies, data stores, etc.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2ac60d9e-b851-afa6-beeb-74cdaa2a9146
* Version Independent ID: e300615f-1b32-df63-bc89-54b3b17dced5
* Content: [Modern Data Warehouse Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,implementation details it would be great if we get a detail step by step implementation details on how to do this specially updated with the newest options of technologies data stores etc document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id beeb version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5050,11995378367.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-08 15:07:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken links,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The following two links are broken:
[Azure Load Balancer Pricing][az-lb-pricing]
[Azure Monitor Pricing][az-monitor-pricing]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/aks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Broken links - The following two links are broken:
[Azure Load Balancer Pricing][az-lb-pricing]
[Azure Monitor Pricing][az-monitor-pricing]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/aks#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,broken links the following two links are broken document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10629,27168795776.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 17:26:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Hope to engage with the creator/contributor of this document,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hi,
I'm Penny Ko (kopenny) in Microsoft. Azure NetApp Files (ANF) team Arnt de Gier (b-arntdegier) would like to update below 2 documents, but there are no Contributor listed on those documents. Is it possible that you could help to identify the creator of that content and share with us? So Arnt would be able to share feedback and hopefully can reuse the existing Visio file instead of creating one from scratch. Thank you!
1. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test : It has no mention of ANF
2. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-production : ANF is only in one sentence.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e700b9a2-8b1d-5d55-95ec-1bb123d2586a
* Version Independent ID: 7f4b8f89-a777-b03b-e0af-d3d890745088
* Content: [SAP deployment on Azure using an Oracle database - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-production)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-production.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-production.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @DharmeshBhagat
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Hope to engage with the creator/contributor of this document -
[Enter feedback here]
Hi,
I'm Penny Ko (kopenny) in Microsoft. Azure NetApp Files (ANF) team Arnt de Gier (b-arntdegier) would like to update below 2 documents, but there are no Contributor listed on those documents. Is it possible that you could help to identify the creator of that content and share with us? So Arnt would be able to share feedback and hopefully can reuse the existing Visio file instead of creating one from scratch. Thank you!
1. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test : It has no mention of ANF
2. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-production : ANF is only in one sentence.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e700b9a2-8b1d-5d55-95ec-1bb123d2586a
* Version Independent ID: 7f4b8f89-a777-b03b-e0af-d3d890745088
* Content: [SAP deployment on Azure using an Oracle database - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-production)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-production.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-production.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @DharmeshBhagat
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,hope to engage with the creator contributor of this document hi i m penny ko kopenny in microsoft azure netapp files anf team arnt de gier b arntdegier would like to update below documents but there are no contributor listed on those documents is it possible that you could help to identify the creator of that content and share with us so arnt would be able to share feedback and hopefully can reuse the existing visio file instead of creating one from scratch thank you it has no mention of anf anf is only in one sentence document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login dharmeshbhagat microsoft alias pnp ,1
5430,12497804530.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:08:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing details about having multiple subscriptions / vnets,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-idea reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"MSFT still positions subscriptions to be one of the scale units and even recommends it down at the application or business group level (e.g. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/organizing-subscriptions-and-resource-groups-within-the-enterprise/). This structure then forces you into having many virtual networks. Please add more realistic examples of how you would structure a network architecture across a global organization with multiple subscriptions (and therefore vnets) across multiple azure regions.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fec640d8-1064-c083-4313-5e8c23fbc2cf
* Version Independent ID: 5f7c63ca-7ab2-9129-4c34-191286e67af1
* Content: [Connect an on-premises network to Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Missing details about having multiple subscriptions / vnets - MSFT still positions subscriptions to be one of the scale units and even recommends it down at the application or business group level (e.g. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/organizing-subscriptions-and-resource-groups-within-the-enterprise/). This structure then forces you into having many virtual networks. Please add more realistic examples of how you would structure a network architecture across a global organization with multiple subscriptions (and therefore vnets) across multiple azure regions.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fec640d8-1064-c083-4313-5e8c23fbc2cf
* Version Independent ID: 5f7c63ca-7ab2-9129-4c34-191286e67af1
* Content: [Connect an on-premises network to Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing details about having multiple subscriptions vnets msft still positions subscriptions to be one of the scale units and even recommends it down at the application or business group level e g this structure then forces you into having many virtual networks please add more realistic examples of how you would structure a network architecture across a global organization with multiple subscriptions and therefore vnets across multiple azure regions document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
4262,10788450660.0,IssuesEvent,2019-11-05 09:48:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Isn't Dynamic Data Masking also supported on Azure SQL DW?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp product-question triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e643be6d-22a2-2b91-c370-edf83d694efe
* Version Independent ID: 770f2e51-9c53-e5ca-1107-9577369b15a6
* Content: [Choosing an analytical data store](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Isn't Dynamic Data Masking also supported on Azure SQL DW? -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e643be6d-22a2-2b91-c370-edf83d694efe
* Version Independent ID: 770f2e51-9c53-e5ca-1107-9577369b15a6
* Content: [Choosing an analytical data store](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,isn t dynamic data masking also supported on azure sql dw document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
6251,14007329137.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-28 21:23:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio File,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement example-scenario/subsvc triaged,"
Will be great have visio file of this.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Windows Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Visio File -
Will be great have visio file of this.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f26be54d-0f67-5098-7839-98f5bb064188
* Version Independent ID: 187fa3ce-ade9-1b07-2af3-c874ec3d0aac
* Content: [Windows Virtual Desktop for the enterprise - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio file will be great have visio file of this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
8998,23960429424.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-12 18:34:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Route All Setting can be Enabled or Disabled,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"Route All Setting can be set to Enabled or Disabled.
To make DNS resolve the hostname to the SQL Database's private IP address, [enable the Route All setting on the web app's VNet integration](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/web-sites-integrate-with-vnet#application-routing).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app#dns-configuration
When testing using nameresolver from a web app with the vnet route all disabled, name resolves to the private IP address after a couple of attempts. The article below states that ""If no custom DNS is specified, it uses Azure default DNS and any private zones linked to the virtual network.""
After your app integrates with your virtual network, it uses the same DNS server that your virtual network is configured with. If no custom DNS is specified, it uses Azure default DNS and any private zones linked to the virtual network.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/overview-vnet-integration#azure-dns-private-zones
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7499b146-3340-d7d1-6c5f-3ed508b773cb
* Version Independent ID: 61b10612-1136-3840-c7c1-804e63b23410
* Content: [Web app private connectivity to Azure SQL Database - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **jelled**",1.0,"Route All Setting can be Enabled or Disabled - Route All Setting can be set to Enabled or Disabled.
To make DNS resolve the hostname to the SQL Database's private IP address, [enable the Route All setting on the web app's VNet integration](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/web-sites-integrate-with-vnet#application-routing).
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app#dns-configuration
When testing using nameresolver from a web app with the vnet route all disabled, name resolves to the private IP address after a couple of attempts. The article below states that ""If no custom DNS is specified, it uses Azure default DNS and any private zones linked to the virtual network.""
After your app integrates with your virtual network, it uses the same DNS server that your virtual network is configured with. If no custom DNS is specified, it uses Azure default DNS and any private zones linked to the virtual network.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/overview-vnet-integration#azure-dns-private-zones
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7499b146-3340-d7d1-6c5f-3ed508b773cb
* Version Independent ID: 61b10612-1136-3840-c7c1-804e63b23410
* Content: [Web app private connectivity to Azure SQL Database - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **jelled**",1,route all setting can be enabled or disabled route all setting can be set to enabled or disabled to make dns resolve the hostname to the sql database s private ip address when testing using nameresolver from a web app with the vnet route all disabled name resolves to the private ip address after a couple of attempts the article below states that if no custom dns is specified it uses azure default dns and any private zones linked to the virtual network after your app integrates with your virtual network it uses the same dns server that your virtual network is configured with if no custom dns is specified it uses azure default dns and any private zones linked to the virtual network document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login jelledruyts microsoft alias jelled ,1
9800,25229470770.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-14 18:31:52,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Solution section is internally inconsistent and mismatches the major use-case,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 design-pattern/subsvc,"In the ""Solution"" section of this page the **Diagram/Image** indicates:
1) Request => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
2) Status Query (in progress) => 200 OK **_<== this is what is most obviously wrong_**
3) Status Query (completed) => 302 Found (with redirect to completed resource)
Meanwhile the **Text** underneath indicates:
1) Request => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
2) Status Query (in progress) => 202 Accepted
3) Status Query (completed) => 302 Found (with redirect to completed resource)
The Logic Apps HTTP shape (with default 'Asynchronous Pattern' = true setting) expects:
1) Request => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
2) Status Query (in progress) => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
3) Status Query (completed) => 200 OK (no redirect) (Errors if given a 302)
Further down the example code implements:
1) Request => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
2) Status Query (in progress) => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
3) Status Query (completed) => 200 OK (no redirect) OR 302 Found (with redirect to completed resource) - depending.
So what exactly IS the official pattern?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Solution section is internally inconsistent and mismatches the major use-case - In the ""Solution"" section of this page the **Diagram/Image** indicates:
1) Request => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
2) Status Query (in progress) => 200 OK **_<== this is what is most obviously wrong_**
3) Status Query (completed) => 302 Found (with redirect to completed resource)
Meanwhile the **Text** underneath indicates:
1) Request => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
2) Status Query (in progress) => 202 Accepted
3) Status Query (completed) => 302 Found (with redirect to completed resource)
The Logic Apps HTTP shape (with default 'Asynchronous Pattern' = true setting) expects:
1) Request => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
2) Status Query (in progress) => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
3) Status Query (completed) => 200 OK (no redirect) (Errors if given a 302)
Further down the example code implements:
1) Request => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
2) Status Query (in progress) => 202 Accepted (with location header set to status URL)
3) Status Query (completed) => 200 OK (no redirect) OR 302 Found (with redirect to completed resource) - depending.
So what exactly IS the official pattern?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,solution section is internally inconsistent and mismatches the major use case in the solution section of this page the diagram image indicates request accepted with location header set to status url status query in progress ok this is what is most obviously wrong status query completed found with redirect to completed resource meanwhile the text underneath indicates request accepted with location header set to status url status query in progress accepted status query completed found with redirect to completed resource the logic apps http shape with default asynchronous pattern true setting expects request accepted with location header set to status url status query in progress accepted with location header set to status url status query completed ok no redirect errors if given a further down the example code implements request accepted with location header set to status url status query in progress accepted with location header set to status url status query completed ok no redirect or found with redirect to completed resource depending so what exactly is the official pattern document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
9706,25080392169.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-07 18:47:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Using log files instead of streaming sensor values,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author doc-idea triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
In many cases you will not be able to use streaming mode for sensor values directly but you would need to extract sensor data from logfiles first. In this case it is possible to send the logfiles and start Azure Functions via Event Grid to extract sensor values. The values may be sent to Kusto for prediction.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b19c5cae-a67a-582a-94a5-4708b4508992
* Version Independent ID: 65757df2-366b-ad29-b1ef-e0de2b84b58f
* Content: [Predictive maintenance - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/predictive-maintenance?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/predictive-maintenance.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/predictive-maintenance.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Using log files instead of streaming sensor values -
[Enter feedback here]
In many cases you will not be able to use streaming mode for sensor values directly but you would need to extract sensor data from logfiles first. In this case it is possible to send the logfiles and start Azure Functions via Event Grid to extract sensor values. The values may be sent to Kusto for prediction.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b19c5cae-a67a-582a-94a5-4708b4508992
* Version Independent ID: 65757df2-366b-ad29-b1ef-e0de2b84b58f
* Content: [Predictive maintenance - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/predictive-maintenance?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/predictive-maintenance.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/predictive-maintenance.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,using log files instead of streaming sensor values in many cases you will not be able to use streaming mode for sensor values directly but you would need to extract sensor data from logfiles first in this case it is possible to send the logfiles and start azure functions via event grid to extract sensor values the values may be sent to kusto for prediction document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
3919,10280265768.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-26 04:26:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Comprehensive,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp kudos triaged,"I found this document to be comprehensive, beautifully written (with examples to clarify each point) and very useful. Great job.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad651d6a-f8d8-2050-e7a7-adbae7326112
* Version Independent ID: 4fddd724-cabd-8623-7692-857088c1dccb
* Content: [API design guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Comprehensive - I found this document to be comprehensive, beautifully written (with examples to clarify each point) and very useful. Great job.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad651d6a-f8d8-2050-e7a7-adbae7326112
* Version Independent ID: 4fddd724-cabd-8623-7692-857088c1dccb
* Content: [API design guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,comprehensive i found this document to be comprehensive beautifully written with examples to clarify each point and very useful great job document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id cabd content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5886,13247810724.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-19 17:53:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can you please provide one implementation sample for this.,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Can you please provide one implementation sample for this architecture.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fc547e3a-5433-08eb-9bc2-c0a44e4280a5
* Version Independent ID: 3ab8ba71-f5c5-dcb4-c1be-cde8b61cda34
* Content: [Secure DevOps for AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/secure-devops-for-kubernetes)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/secure-devops-for-kubernetes.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/secure-devops-for-kubernetes.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can you please provide one implementation sample for this. -
[Enter feedback here]
Can you please provide one implementation sample for this architecture.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fc547e3a-5433-08eb-9bc2-c0a44e4280a5
* Version Independent ID: 3ab8ba71-f5c5-dcb4-c1be-cde8b61cda34
* Content: [Secure DevOps for AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/secure-devops-for-kubernetes)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/secure-devops-for-kubernetes.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/secure-devops-for-kubernetes.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can you please provide one implementation sample for this can you please provide one implementation sample for this architecture document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10377,26860015636.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-03 17:31:30,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Components: Application Gateway Load balancing misleading,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"In the doc the following is written:
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that manages traffic to web applications. Load balancers operate at the transport layer, OSI layer 4 TCP and UDP, and route traffic based on source IP address and port to a destination IP address and port.
Since Application Gateway is just a L7 HTTP/HTTPS load balancer, the sentence about load balancers generally operating at layer 4 might be misleading in this context.
Consider changing to ""Web traffic load balancers operate at the application layer, OSI layer 7 (HTTP/HTTPS),...
Cheers, Jakob
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis?branch=main#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **fabriciosanchez**",2.0,"Components: Application Gateway Load balancing misleading - In the doc the following is written:
Azure Application Gateway is a web traffic load balancer that manages traffic to web applications. Load balancers operate at the transport layer, OSI layer 4 TCP and UDP, and route traffic based on source IP address and port to a destination IP address and port.
Since Application Gateway is just a L7 HTTP/HTTPS load balancer, the sentence about load balancers generally operating at layer 4 might be misleading in this context.
Consider changing to ""Web traffic load balancers operate at the application layer, OSI layer 7 (HTTP/HTTPS),...
Cheers, Jakob
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d61c0c47-bb1e-5bd4-55ed-92058c3c1e2b
* Version Independent ID: 09757b3e-205b-4263-fada-4d0224048f6f
* Content: [Protect APIs with Azure Application Gateway and Azure API Management - Azure Reference Architectures](https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis?branch=main#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/apis/protect-apis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @fabriciosanchez
* Microsoft Alias: **fabriciosanchez**",1,components application gateway load balancing misleading in the doc the following is written azure application gateway is a web traffic load balancer that manages traffic to web applications load balancers operate at the transport layer osi layer tcp and udp and route traffic based on source ip address and port to a destination ip address and port since application gateway is just a http https load balancer the sentence about load balancers generally operating at layer might be misleading in this context consider changing to web traffic load balancers operate at the application layer osi layer http https cheers jakob document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id fada content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login fabriciosanchez microsoft alias fabriciosanchez ,1
9239,24276514173.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-28 14:13:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Examples for non-web workloads and internet facing,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"I have a little bit hard time to understand non-web workloads.
Do you have use case or example application for non-web workloads and internet facing?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Examples for non-web workloads and internet facing - I have a little bit hard time to understand non-web workloads.
Do you have use case or example application for non-web workloads and internet facing?
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,examples for non web workloads and internet facing i have a little bit hard time to understand non web workloads do you have use case or example application for non web workloads and internet facing document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9229,24259712675.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 21:13:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SeatAvailability aggregate broken? ,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"
In the SeatAvailability example, how do we account for overbooking? If two transactions are concurrently running, they may read the same event stream, determine the same number of available seats, and emit a Reservation event. Consider if there is 1 seat remaining, and the two concurrently running transactions reserve 1 seat each.
We don't have a central record that is being updated, so optimistic locking is out. A single processor is possible, but that constrains scalability.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"SeatAvailability aggregate broken? -
In the SeatAvailability example, how do we account for overbooking? If two transactions are concurrently running, they may read the same event stream, determine the same number of available seats, and emit a Reservation event. Consider if there is 1 seat remaining, and the two concurrently running transactions reserve 1 seat each.
We don't have a central record that is being updated, so optimistic locking is out. A single processor is possible, but that constrains scalability.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,seatavailability aggregate broken in the seatavailability example how do we account for overbooking if two transactions are concurrently running they may read the same event stream determine the same number of available seats and emit a reservation event consider if there is seat remaining and the two concurrently running transactions reserve seat each we don t have a central record that is being updated so optimistic locking is out a single processor is possible but that constrains scalability document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9606,24892622130.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-28 13:19:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,update product name,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"The page shows old product name ""FlashGrid SkyCluster"", which is now called ""FlashGrid Cluster"". Also, the references look confusing.
Please update the last paragraph in ""Business continuity and disaster recovery"" section to the following:
You can't use Oracle Real Application Cluster (RAC) by itself in Azure. If you use FlashGrid Cluster, then you can host RAC on Azure. Follow these links for more information:
* Solution details: [FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC on Azure](https://www.flashgrid.io/oracle-rac-in-azure/)
* Azure Marketplace page: [FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC](https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/en-US/marketplace/apps/flashgrid-inc.flashgrid-skycluster)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0d57b80f-9d93-fc7f-bc6d-c96430a06bd5
* Version Independent ID: 471d2970-917e-dace-4d54-6df8208d3d91
* Content: [Oracle database migration: Lift and shift - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-lift-shift)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-lift-shift.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-lift-shift.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @amberz
* Microsoft Alias: **amberz**",1.0,"update product name - The page shows old product name ""FlashGrid SkyCluster"", which is now called ""FlashGrid Cluster"". Also, the references look confusing.
Please update the last paragraph in ""Business continuity and disaster recovery"" section to the following:
You can't use Oracle Real Application Cluster (RAC) by itself in Azure. If you use FlashGrid Cluster, then you can host RAC on Azure. Follow these links for more information:
* Solution details: [FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC on Azure](https://www.flashgrid.io/oracle-rac-in-azure/)
* Azure Marketplace page: [FlashGrid Cluster for Oracle RAC](https://azuremarketplace.microsoft.com/en-US/marketplace/apps/flashgrid-inc.flashgrid-skycluster)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0d57b80f-9d93-fc7f-bc6d-c96430a06bd5
* Version Independent ID: 471d2970-917e-dace-4d54-6df8208d3d91
* Content: [Oracle database migration: Lift and shift - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-lift-shift)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-lift-shift.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-lift-shift.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @amberz
* Microsoft Alias: **amberz**",1,update product name the page shows old product name flashgrid skycluster which is now called flashgrid cluster also the references look confusing please update the last paragraph in business continuity and disaster recovery section to the following you can t use oracle real application cluster rac by itself in azure if you use flashgrid cluster then you can host rac on azure follow these links for more information solution details azure marketplace page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id dace content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login amberz microsoft alias amberz ,1
5052,11995917977.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-08 15:55:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Low-priority VMs,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"Use Azure Spot VM
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ca4aca20-be78-ed61-145d-563fb3ff6d13
* Version Independent ID: c3f02005-d0e7-d756-04b5-655ecd84b1e8
* Content: [Modeling your cloud costs](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/modeling)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/modeling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/modeling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Low-priority VMs - Use Azure Spot VM
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ca4aca20-be78-ed61-145d-563fb3ff6d13
* Version Independent ID: c3f02005-d0e7-d756-04b5-655ecd84b1e8
* Content: [Modeling your cloud costs](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/modeling)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/modeling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/modeling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,low priority vms use azure spot vm document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
9676,25018133556.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:50:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,No Visio file ?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Great resource but the link to download the Visio file is missing on this page.
Thank you
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"No Visio file ? - Great resource but the link to download the Visio file is missing on this page.
Thank you
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,no visio file great resource but the link to download the visio file is missing on this page thank you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10216,26536947982.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-19 16:17:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Additional Issues and Considerations,doc-enhancement in-progress assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 design-pattern/subsvc,"In _Queue-Based Load Leveling pattern_ under _issues and considerations_ I feel there are a couple more considerations that might be worth mentioning.
1) Depending on the load of the service, you can run into a situation where you're effectively always trailing behind. i.e. you're always queuing up more requests than you're burning down. So the kind of traffic of your application needs to be taken into consideration (aside from just handling spikes).
2) The pattern can lose information depending on the persistence of the Queue. If your queue crashes or drops information (due to system limits) there's a possibility that you don't have guaranteed delivery. So the behavior of your queue and system limits need to be taken into consideration based on the needs of your solution.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e0b2b229-0cae-3ba9-180c-5aab1a5a4897
* Version Independent ID: 85c2c9d6-cef4-9a7c-a512-ecdd69e1b456
* Content: [Queue-Based Load Leveling pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Additional Issues and Considerations - In _Queue-Based Load Leveling pattern_ under _issues and considerations_ I feel there are a couple more considerations that might be worth mentioning.
1) Depending on the load of the service, you can run into a situation where you're effectively always trailing behind. i.e. you're always queuing up more requests than you're burning down. So the kind of traffic of your application needs to be taken into consideration (aside from just handling spikes).
2) The pattern can lose information depending on the persistence of the Queue. If your queue crashes or drops information (due to system limits) there's a possibility that you don't have guaranteed delivery. So the behavior of your queue and system limits need to be taken into consideration based on the needs of your solution.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e0b2b229-0cae-3ba9-180c-5aab1a5a4897
* Version Independent ID: 85c2c9d6-cef4-9a7c-a512-ecdd69e1b456
* Content: [Queue-Based Load Leveling pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/queue-based-load-leveling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,additional issues and considerations in queue based load leveling pattern under issues and considerations i feel there are a couple more considerations that might be worth mentioning depending on the load of the service you can run into a situation where you re effectively always trailing behind i e you re always queuing up more requests than you re burning down so the kind of traffic of your application needs to be taken into consideration aside from just handling spikes the pattern can lose information depending on the persistence of the queue if your queue crashes or drops information due to system limits there s a possibility that you don t have guaranteed delivery so the behavior of your queue and system limits need to be taken into consideration based on the needs of your solution document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9093,24037104579.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 20:17:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Traffic Manager vs Front Door,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"why can't we use the front door service instead of the traffic manager?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2442849c-9e87-56b2-dffd-5c8089e8132c
* Version Independent ID: 828da465-186b-f819-9575-ee51e8c83306
* Content: [Multi-tier web application built for HA/DR - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @sujayt
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Traffic Manager vs Front Door - why can't we use the front door service instead of the traffic manager?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2442849c-9e87-56b2-dffd-5c8089e8132c
* Version Independent ID: 828da465-186b-f819-9575-ee51e8c83306
* Content: [Multi-tier web application built for HA/DR - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @sujayt
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,traffic manager vs front door why can t we use the front door service instead of the traffic manager document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id dffd version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login sujayt microsoft alias pnp ,1
5083,12035359600.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-13 17:44:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Validate data types of properties inside the object,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"When I expect an object as a parameter, is it possible to define the data types of the properties inside it?
Example: I expect object parameter ""credential"" to be supplied. This object will contain two properties ""user"" and ""password"". I need ARM to treat ""password"" as a securestring and not a normal string.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa870d42-1b00-d600-4fef-dd67219a1dc6
* Version Independent ID: 61fa68a5-a08b-7693-ebfd-18711ebd1bbb
* Content: [Use an object as a parameter in an Azure Resource Manager template - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters)
* Content Source: [docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Validate data types of properties inside the object - When I expect an object as a parameter, is it possible to define the data types of the properties inside it?
Example: I expect object parameter ""credential"" to be supplied. This object will contain two properties ""user"" and ""password"". I need ARM to treat ""password"" as a securestring and not a normal string.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa870d42-1b00-d600-4fef-dd67219a1dc6
* Version Independent ID: 61fa68a5-a08b-7693-ebfd-18711ebd1bbb
* Content: [Use an object as a parameter in an Azure Resource Manager template - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters)
* Content Source: [docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/building-blocks/extending-templates/objects-as-parameters.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,validate data types of properties inside the object when i expect an object as a parameter is it possible to define the data types of the properties inside it example i expect object parameter credential to be supplied this object will contain two properties user and password i need arm to treat password as a securestring and not a normal string document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id ebfd content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6637,14973041586.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-28 00:08:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing Icons,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"
I cannot find cions for Machine Learning, Databricks.
Can you please provide a complete set of icons.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing Icons -
I cannot find cions for Machine Learning, Databricks.
Can you please provide a complete set of icons.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing icons i cannot find cions for machine learning databricks can you please provide a complete set of icons document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11075,27964458147.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 18:12:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing product links,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 guide/subsvc,"The page should include links to Azure Load Testing and Azure Chaos Studio product doc pages
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ded56014-b7da-2acd-6b38-e71611a50200
* Version Independent ID: ded56014-b7da-2acd-6b38-e71611a50200
* Content: [Continuous validation with Azure Load Testing and Azure Chaos Studio - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/testing/mission-critical-deployment-testing)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/testing/mission-critical-deployment-testing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/testing/mission-critical-deployment-testing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @heoelri
* Microsoft Alias: **msimecek**",1.0,"Missing product links - The page should include links to Azure Load Testing and Azure Chaos Studio product doc pages
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ded56014-b7da-2acd-6b38-e71611a50200
* Version Independent ID: ded56014-b7da-2acd-6b38-e71611a50200
* Content: [Continuous validation with Azure Load Testing and Azure Chaos Studio - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/testing/mission-critical-deployment-testing)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/testing/mission-critical-deployment-testing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/testing/mission-critical-deployment-testing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @heoelri
* Microsoft Alias: **msimecek**",1,missing product links the page should include links to azure load testing and azure chaos studio product doc pages document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login heoelri microsoft alias msimecek ,1
4934,11855640073.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-25 05:01:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Resou_rce in architecture diagram.,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Architecture diagram splits term ""Resou rce"" in three places.
-- Joe
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 900b3b20-5693-1beb-0b4b-161548a7d14f
* Version Independent ID: 94d5daef-6e7b-23d2-58bd-b2796bbbc7e1
* Content: [Dev-Test deployment for testing PaaS solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-paas)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-paas.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-paas.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Resou_rce in architecture diagram. -
[Enter feedback here]
Architecture diagram splits term ""Resou rce"" in three places.
-- Joe
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 900b3b20-5693-1beb-0b4b-161548a7d14f
* Version Independent ID: 94d5daef-6e7b-23d2-58bd-b2796bbbc7e1
* Content: [Dev-Test deployment for testing PaaS solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-paas)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-paas.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-paas.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,resou rce in architecture diagram architecture diagram splits term resou rce in three places joe document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
7071,16459924680.0,IssuesEvent,2021-05-21 17:20:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How to do custom routing?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[What if I want to have custom routing instead of load balancer routing?]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2b8e780c-8b2b-f579-d380-a33cb76f0e82
* Version Independent ID: e666a3fc-cb2e-30a8-c4ab-b8db700e05cb
* Content: [IaaS: Web application with relational database - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/ref-arch-iaas-web-and-db)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/ref-arch-iaas-web-and-db.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/ref-arch-iaas-web-and-db.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Maggsl
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"How to do custom routing? -
[What if I want to have custom routing instead of load balancer routing?]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2b8e780c-8b2b-f579-d380-a33cb76f0e82
* Version Independent ID: e666a3fc-cb2e-30a8-c4ab-b8db700e05cb
* Content: [IaaS: Web application with relational database - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/ref-arch-iaas-web-and-db)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/ref-arch-iaas-web-and-db.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/ref-arch-iaas-web-and-db.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Maggsl
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,how to do custom routing document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login maggsl microsoft alias pnp ,1
5188,12215427460.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-01 12:52:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Wrong HTTP Method in the explanation of exmple,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"In section ""Processing Requests"" the last point ""An HTTP PUT request to the URI https://adventure-works.com/customers/2/orders to create a new order for this customer. The data must be provided in the request message in x-www-form-urlencoded format"" says PUT request. But as per related JSON response example should this be POST instead of PUT?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 329fde76-a838-59c9-73f6-96424c03a6e0
* Version Independent ID: 203cd155-00c5-286b-96ce-5961c24c6273
* Content: [API implementation guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-implementation)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-implementation.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/api-implementation.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Wrong HTTP Method in the explanation of exmple - In section ""Processing Requests"" the last point ""An HTTP PUT request to the URI https://adventure-works.com/customers/2/orders to create a new order for this customer. The data must be provided in the request message in x-www-form-urlencoded format"" says PUT request. But as per related JSON response example should this be POST instead of PUT?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 329fde76-a838-59c9-73f6-96424c03a6e0
* Version Independent ID: 203cd155-00c5-286b-96ce-5961c24c6273
* Content: [API implementation guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-implementation)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-implementation.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/api-implementation.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,wrong http method in the explanation of exmple in section processing requests the last point an http put request to the uri to create a new order for this customer the data must be provided in the request message in x www form urlencoded format says put request but as per related json response example should this be post instead of put document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6025,13524999782.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-15 12:25:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Typo,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug triaged well-architected/subsvc,"The second section of this page has the word ""dingle"" where I assume it is meant ""single"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ee907a51-a7f2-16b6-7c61-e5b09f14229f
* Version Independent ID: 4725a038-dcf1-efee-bc9e-86d3322d52d0
* Content: [Security with identity and access management (IAM) in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/design-identity#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/design-identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/design-identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Typo - The second section of this page has the word ""dingle"" where I assume it is meant ""single"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ee907a51-a7f2-16b6-7c61-e5b09f14229f
* Version Independent ID: 4725a038-dcf1-efee-bc9e-86d3322d52d0
* Content: [Security with identity and access management (IAM) in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/design-identity#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/design-identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/design-identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo the second section of this page has the word dingle where i assume it is meant single document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id efee content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9102,24038625937.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 21:55:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Manageability Considerations,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Please clarify in the Manageability Considerations section if restarting the vm via the portal is okay to do. Many people are confused including myself if it is just shutdown via the portal that is dangerous or shutdowns and restarts.
Also, will Windows Server 2012 and higher ""self heal"" if the vm is deallocated? What actions need to be taken in the event of vm deallocation with respect to the domain /AD DS?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Manageability Considerations -
Please clarify in the Manageability Considerations section if restarting the vm via the portal is okay to do. Many people are confused including myself if it is just shutdown via the portal that is dangerous or shutdowns and restarts.
Also, will Windows Server 2012 and higher ""self heal"" if the vm is deallocated? What actions need to be taken in the event of vm deallocation with respect to the domain /AD DS?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,manageability considerations please clarify in the manageability considerations section if restarting the vm via the portal is okay to do many people are confused including myself if it is just shutdown via the portal that is dangerous or shutdowns and restarts also will windows server and higher self heal if the vm is deallocated what actions need to be taken in the event of vm deallocation with respect to the domain ad ds document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
4194,10684798596.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-22 11:18:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Asp.NET core does support WS-Fed support,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Hi team,
I moved this fom here: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center.sv-se/issues/2
The contibutor refers to the original documentation
@AndersAbel commented on 9 Nov 2018
ASP.NET Core does not include out-of-the-box support for WS-Federation.
It does now, through the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.WsFederation package.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a0c48ff6-008c-6e27-b24d-34f05dcc5f07
* Version Independent ID: 9b39998a-f548-776f-a334-09c83e485f6a
* Content: [Federate with a customer's AD FS](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/adfs)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/adfs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/adfs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Asp.NET core does support WS-Fed support - Hi team,
I moved this fom here: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center.sv-se/issues/2
The contibutor refers to the original documentation
@AndersAbel commented on 9 Nov 2018
ASP.NET Core does not include out-of-the-box support for WS-Federation.
It does now, through the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.WsFederation package.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a0c48ff6-008c-6e27-b24d-34f05dcc5f07
* Version Independent ID: 9b39998a-f548-776f-a334-09c83e485f6a
* Content: [Federate with a customer's AD FS](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/adfs)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/adfs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/adfs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,asp net core does support ws fed support hi team i moved this fom here the contibutor refers to the original documentation andersabel commented on nov asp net core does not include out of the box support for ws federation it does now through the microsoft aspnetcore authentication wsfederation package document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
9406,24537606073.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-11 22:35:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Seems like the labels on the LB's are reversed,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Looking at the diagram on this page, it seems like the lb labels are reversed.
The ""front"" LB is labeled ILB, while the LBs in the tiers behind it are labeled ""LB"".
My understanding is that in Azure, we typically call la LB with a public IP a ""Load Balancer"", while a LB with a private IP is called an ""Internal Load Balancer"" or ""ILB"". See: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/load-balancer/components#frontend-ip-configurations
Hence I believe the labels on this chart are reversed.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2442849c-9e87-56b2-dffd-5c8089e8132c
* Version Independent ID: 828da465-186b-f819-9575-ee51e8c83306
* Content: [Multi-tier web application built for HA/DR - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @sujayt
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Seems like the labels on the LB's are reversed - Looking at the diagram on this page, it seems like the lb labels are reversed.
The ""front"" LB is labeled ILB, while the LBs in the tiers behind it are labeled ""LB"".
My understanding is that in Azure, we typically call la LB with a public IP a ""Load Balancer"", while a LB with a private IP is called an ""Internal Load Balancer"" or ""ILB"". See: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/load-balancer/components#frontend-ip-configurations
Hence I believe the labels on this chart are reversed.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2442849c-9e87-56b2-dffd-5c8089e8132c
* Version Independent ID: 828da465-186b-f819-9575-ee51e8c83306
* Content: [Multi-tier web application built for HA/DR - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/infrastructure/multi-tier-app-disaster-recovery.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @sujayt
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,seems like the labels on the lb s are reversed looking at the diagram on this page it seems like the lb labels are reversed the front lb is labeled ilb while the lbs in the tiers behind it are labeled lb my understanding is that in azure we typically call la lb with a public ip a load balancer while a lb with a private ip is called an internal load balancer or ilb see hence i believe the labels on this chart are reversed document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id dffd version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login sujayt microsoft alias pnp ,1
5595,12749768528.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-27 00:13:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Partitioning Azure table storage : entity with one natural key,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc triaged,"Documentation https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies#partitioning-azure-table-storage states that ""If an entity has one natural key, then use it as the partition key and specify an empty string as the row key"". But it also states that the combination of partition key and row key should be unique. Isn't the usage of empty string as row key violation of this constraint unless we want separate partition for each entity?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ef578ecf-7b41-cac8-ba5d-2e132c337b1e
* Version Independent ID: f325ab09-f55d-42ce-5892-a116d4958d6c
* Content: [Data partitioning strategies - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Partitioning Azure table storage : entity with one natural key - Documentation https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies#partitioning-azure-table-storage states that ""If an entity has one natural key, then use it as the partition key and specify an empty string as the row key"". But it also states that the combination of partition key and row key should be unique. Isn't the usage of empty string as row key violation of this constraint unless we want separate partition for each entity?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ef578ecf-7b41-cac8-ba5d-2e132c337b1e
* Version Independent ID: f325ab09-f55d-42ce-5892-a116d4958d6c
* Content: [Data partitioning strategies - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/data-partitioning-strategies.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,partitioning azure table storage entity with one natural key documentation states that if an entity has one natural key then use it as the partition key and specify an empty string as the row key but it also states that the combination of partition key and row key should be unique isn t the usage of empty string as row key violation of this constraint unless we want separate partition for each entity document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10087,26220113928.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-04 14:14:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,diagrams are confusing and make no sense. ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4943e185-fb94-576a-d0a1-2cfefd0d0f96
* Version Independent ID: a9a5a4b7-887c-c298-f720-49ed6abaa575
* Content: [Federated Identity pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/federated-identity)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/federated-identity.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/federated-identity.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"diagrams are confusing and make no sense. -
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4943e185-fb94-576a-d0a1-2cfefd0d0f96
* Version Independent ID: a9a5a4b7-887c-c298-f720-49ed6abaa575
* Content: [Federated Identity pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/federated-identity)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/federated-identity.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/federated-identity.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,diagrams are confusing and make no sense document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
4589,11394120131.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-30 08:38:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio Diagram ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement example-scenarios/subsvc triaged,"please can we have the visio Diagram of the same architect?
Thank you
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ac160993-f333-03d1-ee24-394adedbb830
* Version Independent ID: a9be7642-9bea-b561-7a30-0b152b93285f
* Content: [Securely managed web applications - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/fully-managed-secure-apps#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/fully-managed-secure-apps.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/fully-managed-secure-apps.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenarios**
* GitHub Login: @fmustaf
* Microsoft Alias: **faisalm**",1.0,"Visio Diagram - please can we have the visio Diagram of the same architect?
Thank you
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ac160993-f333-03d1-ee24-394adedbb830
* Version Independent ID: a9be7642-9bea-b561-7a30-0b152b93285f
* Content: [Securely managed web applications - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/fully-managed-secure-apps#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/fully-managed-secure-apps.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/fully-managed-secure-apps.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenarios**
* GitHub Login: @fmustaf
* Microsoft Alias: **faisalm**",1,visio diagram please can we have the visio diagram of the same architect thank you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenarios github login fmustaf microsoft alias faisalm ,1
5456,12503156828.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-02 06:37:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Implementation details for AuthN/AuthZ and .Net Core backend,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Hi,
Thank you for the article. It's clear on how this can be setup. However, if you can also provide some implementation details on the following tech stack, that would be much appreciated!
1. Backend with RestApi services built in .Net Core (hosted on AppService of course).
2. AuthN/AuthZ to manage users, along with authentication provided by Facebook and Google.
3. Xamarin app which manages AuthN using client sdk's from Facebook and Google.
Question: Where would the users be managed? How will they be connected to the backend data models to their data?
Question: According to this link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/overview-authentication-authorization , .Net Core does not support populating the current user. How will the whole tree work without that then?
Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 839bcfd0-caf7-c1f2-0dab-3340d9f8f528
* Version Independent ID: 8631e812-4b30-9c93-a007-203bc05a238e
* Content: [Social App for Mobile and Web with Authentication - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Implementation details for AuthN/AuthZ and .Net Core backend - Hi,
Thank you for the article. It's clear on how this can be setup. However, if you can also provide some implementation details on the following tech stack, that would be much appreciated!
1. Backend with RestApi services built in .Net Core (hosted on AppService of course).
2. AuthN/AuthZ to manage users, along with authentication provided by Facebook and Google.
3. Xamarin app which manages AuthN using client sdk's from Facebook and Google.
Question: Where would the users be managed? How will they be connected to the backend data models to their data?
Question: According to this link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/overview-authentication-authorization , .Net Core does not support populating the current user. How will the whole tree work without that then?
Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 839bcfd0-caf7-c1f2-0dab-3340d9f8f528
* Version Independent ID: 8631e812-4b30-9c93-a007-203bc05a238e
* Content: [Social App for Mobile and Web with Authentication - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,implementation details for authn authz and net core backend hi thank you for the article it s clear on how this can be setup however if you can also provide some implementation details on the following tech stack that would be much appreciated backend with restapi services built in net core hosted on appservice of course authn authz to manage users along with authentication provided by facebook and google xamarin app which manages authn using client sdk s from facebook and google question where would the users be managed how will they be connected to the backend data models to their data question according to this link net core does not support populating the current user how will the whole tree work without that then thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
11080,27968234571.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 21:55:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Architecture flow diagram not correct,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"Looking at the architecture flow diagram, I have a few comments on things that don't look correct (see screenshot image)
1. Typo. ""loud"" should be ""cloud""
2. ""Build New"" needs to connect up with containerized. The diagram, shows containerization only relevant for ""Migrations"" which isn't correct
3. This is not an error, but not great advice IMHO. ACI should be replaced with Container Apps. This diagram may lead some to use ACI for production workloads that don't need ""full orchestration"". I would suggest that in almost all cases for production apps, Container Apps is more suited for production use cases, given that ACI can't scale more than 1 instance
Thanks for the initiative with this diagram, it's useful as a basic tool to investigating services for right purpose
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree?WT.mc_id=javascript-74010-ninarasi)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree?WT.mc_id=javascript-74010-ninarasi)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Architecture flow diagram not correct - Looking at the architecture flow diagram, I have a few comments on things that don't look correct (see screenshot image)
1. Typo. ""loud"" should be ""cloud""
2. ""Build New"" needs to connect up with containerized. The diagram, shows containerization only relevant for ""Migrations"" which isn't correct
3. This is not an error, but not great advice IMHO. ACI should be replaced with Container Apps. This diagram may lead some to use ACI for production workloads that don't need ""full orchestration"". I would suggest that in almost all cases for production apps, Container Apps is more suited for production use cases, given that ACI can't scale more than 1 instance
Thanks for the initiative with this diagram, it's useful as a basic tool to investigating services for right purpose
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree?WT.mc_id=javascript-74010-ninarasi)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree?WT.mc_id=javascript-74010-ninarasi)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,architecture flow diagram not correct looking at the architecture flow diagram i have a few comments on things that don t look correct see screenshot image typo loud should be cloud build new needs to connect up with containerized the diagram shows containerization only relevant for migrations which isn t correct this is not an error but not great advice imho aci should be replaced with container apps this diagram may lead some to use aci for production workloads that don t need full orchestration i would suggest that in almost all cases for production apps container apps is more suited for production use cases given that aci can t scale more than instance thanks for the initiative with this diagram it s useful as a basic tool to investigating services for right purpose document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
5664,12959596451.0,IssuesEvent,2020-07-20 13:14:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Empty alert in the Sharding section,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-bug triaged,"There is an empty alert in the Sharding section
Url: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/sharding#when-to-use-this-pattern
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 050bb1fd-56ca-63bc-b105-17a56e3b0362
* Version Independent ID: ce84d0a7-3596-e259-dfc3-a9789efd9948
* Content: [Sharding pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/sharding)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/sharding.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/sharding.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Empty alert in the Sharding section - There is an empty alert in the Sharding section
Url: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/sharding#when-to-use-this-pattern
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 050bb1fd-56ca-63bc-b105-17a56e3b0362
* Version Independent ID: ce84d0a7-3596-e259-dfc3-a9789efd9948
* Content: [Sharding pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/sharding)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/sharding.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/sharding.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,empty alert in the sharding section there is an empty alert in the sharding section url document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9822,25312985719.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-17 19:02:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"What does ""Ensure all updates to the IP Groups and policies have an implicit firewall update that is run afterwards."" mean ?",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
as per subject, reading through this doc and i dont quite understand what this statement means .
If we say add a new IP Address (cidr/range) to an existing IP Group , used in a firewall , is there an extra step to make it live / effected ? If so what is it ?
From memory a Firewall Policy update triggers an Update operation on the Firewall automatically , is this the same for an IP Group change ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 215d0a3c-ef5b-7581-dbdf-e418b4891276
* Version Independent ID: 3647b4bf-6a85-8257-5792-39c5eae6785f
* Content: [Azure Well-Architected Framework review of Azure Firewall - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/guide/well-architected-framework-azure-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/guide/well-architected-framework-azure-firewall.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/networking/guide/well-architected-framework-azure-firewall.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @rohilla-shweta
* Microsoft Alias: **rosanto**",1.0,"What does ""Ensure all updates to the IP Groups and policies have an implicit firewall update that is run afterwards."" mean ? -
[Enter feedback here]
as per subject, reading through this doc and i dont quite understand what this statement means .
If we say add a new IP Address (cidr/range) to an existing IP Group , used in a firewall , is there an extra step to make it live / effected ? If so what is it ?
From memory a Firewall Policy update triggers an Update operation on the Firewall automatically , is this the same for an IP Group change ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 215d0a3c-ef5b-7581-dbdf-e418b4891276
* Version Independent ID: 3647b4bf-6a85-8257-5792-39c5eae6785f
* Content: [Azure Well-Architected Framework review of Azure Firewall - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/guide/well-architected-framework-azure-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/guide/well-architected-framework-azure-firewall.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/networking/guide/well-architected-framework-azure-firewall.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @rohilla-shweta
* Microsoft Alias: **rosanto**",1,what does ensure all updates to the ip groups and policies have an implicit firewall update that is run afterwards mean as per subject reading through this doc and i dont quite understand what this statement means if we say add a new ip address cidr range to an existing ip group used in a firewall is there an extra step to make it live effected if so what is it from memory a firewall policy update triggers an update operation on the firewall automatically is this the same for an ip group change document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id dbdf version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login rohilla shweta microsoft alias rosanto ,1
7272,17287335468.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-24 01:34:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Grammatical error in statement,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug guide/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Grammatical error
> Also, the data in an RDBMS must **_be_** normalized, which isn't appropriate for every data set.
**_be_** is missing in above statement
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e40cb85c-ee53-7b49-0622-bed8ebedea81
* Version Independent ID: 896e0838-dfd1-c442-414d-ad9ea6dc8f7d
* Content: [Understand data store models - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Grammatical error in statement -
[Enter feedback here]
Grammatical error
> Also, the data in an RDBMS must **_be_** normalized, which isn't appropriate for every data set.
**_be_** is missing in above statement
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e40cb85c-ee53-7b49-0622-bed8ebedea81
* Version Independent ID: 896e0838-dfd1-c442-414d-ad9ea6dc8f7d
* Content: [Understand data store models - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,grammatical error in statement grammatical error also the data in an rdbms must be normalized which isn t appropriate for every data set be is missing in above statement document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dsk microsoft alias pnp ,1
9514,24732946356.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-20 19:15:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Misleading title,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
There's also a service called ""Azure Firewall"" and the document is about 3rd party FWs/NVAs. Should be changed to something like ""Azure advanced firewall architecture guide""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2c9f2509-a3f9-d8bf-e0bf-a9c970d5a423
* Version Independent ID: 62cbc02f-3a6a-2966-380d-af66737f8711
* Content: [Azure Firewall Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/firewalls/)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/firewalls/index.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/firewalls/index.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @RZomerman
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Misleading title -
There's also a service called ""Azure Firewall"" and the document is about 3rd party FWs/NVAs. Should be changed to something like ""Azure advanced firewall architecture guide""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2c9f2509-a3f9-d8bf-e0bf-a9c970d5a423
* Version Independent ID: 62cbc02f-3a6a-2966-380d-af66737f8711
* Content: [Azure Firewall Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/firewalls/)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/firewalls/index.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/firewalls/index.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @RZomerman
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,misleading title there s also a service called azure firewall and the document is about party fws nvas should be changed to something like azure advanced firewall architecture guide document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login rzomerman microsoft alias pnp ,1
9089,24036893438.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 20:05:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,This command is implicitly deprecated because command group 'group deployment' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Use 'deployment group' instead.,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri3,"C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows>azbb -s 80314534-8a20-4ecc-988a-f7ea09a45070 -g DanB -l westus2 -p n-tier-windows.json --deploy
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-01.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-02.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-03.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-04.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-05.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-06.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-07.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-08.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-09.json
This command is implicitly deprecated because command group 'group deployment' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Use 'deployment group' instead.
Unable to parse parameter: @C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus
error: error executing az
status: 1
arguments: group deployment create --name bb-01-vnet --subscription 80314534-8a20-4ecc-988a-f7ea09a45e70 --resource-group DanB --template-uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mspnp/template-building-blocks/v2.2.0/templates/buildingBlocks/virtualNetworks/virtualNetworks.json --parameters @C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-01.json
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8c00d25f-b981-29e3-bd64-865fda0b0d33
* Version Independent ID: 36bcc6f0-0fa4-df9c-cff5-4fdfb3460432
* Content: [Windows N-tier application on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server#deploy-the-solution)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"This command is implicitly deprecated because command group 'group deployment' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Use 'deployment group' instead. - C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows>azbb -s 80314534-8a20-4ecc-988a-f7ea09a45070 -g DanB -l westus2 -p n-tier-windows.json --deploy
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-01.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-02.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-03.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-04.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-05.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-06.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-07.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-08.json
parameters written to C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-09.json
This command is implicitly deprecated because command group 'group deployment' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Use 'deployment group' instead.
Unable to parse parameter: @C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus
error: error executing az
status: 1
arguments: group deployment create --name bb-01-vnet --subscription 80314534-8a20-4ecc-988a-f7ea09a45e70 --resource-group DanB --template-uri https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mspnp/template-building-blocks/v2.2.0/templates/buildingBlocks/virtualNetworks/virtualNetworks.json --parameters @C:\Users\dbomgardner\Nexus Technologies Inc\Azure RM Templates\ntier-windows\n-tier-windows-output-01.json
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8c00d25f-b981-29e3-bd64-865fda0b0d33
* Version Independent ID: 36bcc6f0-0fa4-df9c-cff5-4fdfb3460432
* Content: [Windows N-tier application on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server#deploy-the-solution)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/n-tier-sql-server.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,this command is implicitly deprecated because command group group deployment is deprecated and will be removed in a future release use deployment group instead c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows azbb s g danb l p n tier windows json deploy parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json parameters written to c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json this command is implicitly deprecated because command group group deployment is deprecated and will be removed in a future release use deployment group instead unable to parse parameter c users dbomgardner nexus error error executing az status arguments group deployment create name bb vnet subscription resource group danb template uri parameters c users dbomgardner nexus technologies inc azure rm templates ntier windows n tier windows output json document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10678,27268500711.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-22 20:07:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Choice of Ingress Controller,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
It would be great if this article could reason more the choice of the traefik ingress controller. Especially why you are not using your own Application gateway ingress controller toghether with the application gateway?
from an architecture standpoint it seems simpler to use as a starting point.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Choice of Ingress Controller -
It would be great if this article could reason more the choice of the traefik ingress controller. Especially why you are not using your own Application gateway ingress controller toghether with the application gateway?
from an architecture standpoint it seems simpler to use as a starting point.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,choice of ingress controller it would be great if this article could reason more the choice of the traefik ingress controller especially why you are not using your own application gateway ingress controller toghether with the application gateway from an architecture standpoint it seems simpler to use as a starting point document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11338,30116482179.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-30 11:59:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Would love to see a Network Planning section included as well,assigned-to-author product-feedback triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
Awesome work on this architectural reference. I was looking for a Networking planning section where it lists any network addressing requirements and was able to find it in the bicep implementation example on GitHub, however, was not present within the doc itself.
Doc ref. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/baseline-zone-redundant?source=docs
I would have loved to see it included in the doc. A quick list of what is required would be great to have. Such as
var vnetAddressPrefix = '10.0.0.0/16'
var appGatewaySubnetPrefix = '10.0.1.0/24'
var appServicesSubnetPrefix = '10.0.0.0/24'
var privateEndpointsSubnetPrefix = '10.0.2.0/27'
var agentsSubnetPrefix = '10.0.2.32/27'
Taken from: https://github.com/Azure-Samples/app-service-baseline-implementation/blob/main/infra-as-code/bicep/network.bicep
Thanks!
Johnny Harbieh
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3b40adb2-53a0-55ac-e18b-de8cb18cb8c8
* Version Independent ID: 3b40adb2-53a0-55ac-e18b-de8cb18cb8c8
* Content: [Baseline highly available zone-redundant app services web application - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/baseline-zone-redundant?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/baseline-zone-redundant.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/baseline-zone-redundant.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",2.0,"Would love to see a Network Planning section included as well -
[Enter feedback here]
Awesome work on this architectural reference. I was looking for a Networking planning section where it lists any network addressing requirements and was able to find it in the bicep implementation example on GitHub, however, was not present within the doc itself.
Doc ref. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/baseline-zone-redundant?source=docs
I would have loved to see it included in the doc. A quick list of what is required would be great to have. Such as
var vnetAddressPrefix = '10.0.0.0/16'
var appGatewaySubnetPrefix = '10.0.1.0/24'
var appServicesSubnetPrefix = '10.0.0.0/24'
var privateEndpointsSubnetPrefix = '10.0.2.0/27'
var agentsSubnetPrefix = '10.0.2.32/27'
Taken from: https://github.com/Azure-Samples/app-service-baseline-implementation/blob/main/infra-as-code/bicep/network.bicep
Thanks!
Johnny Harbieh
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3b40adb2-53a0-55ac-e18b-de8cb18cb8c8
* Version Independent ID: 3b40adb2-53a0-55ac-e18b-de8cb18cb8c8
* Content: [Baseline highly available zone-redundant app services web application - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/baseline-zone-redundant?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/baseline-zone-redundant.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/baseline-zone-redundant.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1,would love to see a network planning section included as well awesome work on this architectural reference i was looking for a networking planning section where it lists any network addressing requirements and was able to find it in the bicep implementation example on github however was not present within the doc itself doc ref i would have loved to see it included in the doc a quick list of what is required would be great to have such as var vnetaddressprefix var appgatewaysubnetprefix var appservicessubnetprefix var privateendpointssubnetprefix var agentssubnetprefix taken from thanks johnny harbieh document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login robbagby microsoft alias robbag ,1
10608,27136512875.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-16 13:37:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,More on Security ,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"John,
Great work! Want to learn more about Security for the multitenant solution. e.g. Sentinel, MD for Cloud
Wenshuo Han
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4c251cb1-6f09-e84b-3432-75fa2760bff2
* Version Independent ID: 4c251cb1-6f09-e84b-3432-75fa2760bff2
* Content: [Azure Key Vault considerations for multitenancy - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/multitenant/service/key-vault)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/multitenant/service/key-vault.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/multitenant/service/key-vault.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @johndowns
* Microsoft Alias: **jodowns**",1.0,"More on Security - John,
Great work! Want to learn more about Security for the multitenant solution. e.g. Sentinel, MD for Cloud
Wenshuo Han
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4c251cb1-6f09-e84b-3432-75fa2760bff2
* Version Independent ID: 4c251cb1-6f09-e84b-3432-75fa2760bff2
* Content: [Azure Key Vault considerations for multitenancy - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/multitenant/service/key-vault)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/multitenant/service/key-vault.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/multitenant/service/key-vault.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @johndowns
* Microsoft Alias: **jodowns**",1,more on security john great work want to learn more about security for the multitenant solution e g sentinel md for cloud wenshuo han document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login johndowns microsoft alias jodowns ,1
10223,26543768464.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-19 21:42:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,GitHub vulnerability management - Markdown link broken,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
Broken Markdown - should be a link, but displays verbatim
`[Vulnerability management][GitHub vulnerability management]
`
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e3e82337-21f1-4c3c-0a71-2436a96cf9ad
* Version Independent ID: 9fee3170-fd8b-dcb5-3bed-6858880f9337
* Content: [DevSecOps with GitHub Security - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-github?ocid=eml_pg356512_gdc_comm_az&mkt_tok=MTU3LUdRRS0zODIAAAGGbaXO_GMIPvW_dHnT8AdrZoY-2fM3XK-B5VCsSGvsZ5xUsswl2xLJ_V3Y04BPGo-PiMk7nipn4mH-iafDYhLdAW6Nn9k2pkPiuTEpypeIlG0-OhMWlTspuAtI)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-github.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-github.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @fmigacz
* Microsoft Alias: **fmigacz**",1.0,"GitHub vulnerability management - Markdown link broken -
Broken Markdown - should be a link, but displays verbatim
`[Vulnerability management][GitHub vulnerability management]
`
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e3e82337-21f1-4c3c-0a71-2436a96cf9ad
* Version Independent ID: 9fee3170-fd8b-dcb5-3bed-6858880f9337
* Content: [DevSecOps with GitHub Security - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-github?ocid=eml_pg356512_gdc_comm_az&mkt_tok=MTU3LUdRRS0zODIAAAGGbaXO_GMIPvW_dHnT8AdrZoY-2fM3XK-B5VCsSGvsZ5xUsswl2xLJ_V3Y04BPGo-PiMk7nipn4mH-iafDYhLdAW6Nn9k2pkPiuTEpypeIlG0-OhMWlTspuAtI)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-github.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/devsecops-in-github.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @fmigacz
* Microsoft Alias: **fmigacz**",1,github vulnerability management markdown link broken broken markdown should be a link but displays verbatim document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login fmigacz microsoft alias fmigacz ,1
5006,11942537424.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 21:12:01,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Download documentation for offline,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc triaged,"It used to be possible to download this document for offline usage. Now it is not possible.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e4699b7a-fc21-817e-5a37-aa17b55f47a2
* Version Independent ID: 23efcd5d-11a5-c46f-a73e-5cc638591bcd
* Content: [Bulkhead pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/bulkhead)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/bulkhead.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/bulkhead.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Download documentation for offline - It used to be possible to download this document for offline usage. Now it is not possible.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e4699b7a-fc21-817e-5a37-aa17b55f47a2
* Version Independent ID: 23efcd5d-11a5-c46f-a73e-5cc638591bcd
* Content: [Bulkhead pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/bulkhead)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/bulkhead.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/bulkhead.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,download documentation for offline it used to be possible to download this document for offline usage now it is not possible document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6513,14704751003.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-04 16:58:30,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Typo ""Azure function apps""→""Azure Function Apps""",architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Typo ""Azure function apps""→""Azure Function Apps""
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/azure-functions-hybrid
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 229cb7ce-81f0-4005-356e-66c73e6d257f
* Version Independent ID: 00100699-8feb-bba3-f6d3-001c6ea2a62f
* Content: [Azure Functions in a hybrid environment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/azure-functions-hybrid)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/azure-functions-hybrid.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/hybrid/azure-functions-hybrid.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Typo ""Azure function apps""→""Azure Function Apps"" - Typo ""Azure function apps""→""Azure Function Apps""
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/azure-functions-hybrid
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 229cb7ce-81f0-4005-356e-66c73e6d257f
* Version Independent ID: 00100699-8feb-bba3-f6d3-001c6ea2a62f
* Content: [Azure Functions in a hybrid environment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/azure-functions-hybrid)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/azure-functions-hybrid.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/hybrid/azure-functions-hybrid.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo azure function apps → azure function apps typo azure function apps → azure function apps document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5991,13463156749.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-09 17:08:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Aug's link is not accessible ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug meta/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
all Aug's link is not accessible
here is one sample
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture_architecture-center-pr/docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in the Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog#august-2020)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **meta**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Aug's link is not accessible -
[Enter feedback here]
all Aug's link is not accessible
here is one sample
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture_architecture-center-pr/docs/solution-ideas/articles/custom-business-processes
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in the Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog#august-2020)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **meta**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,aug s link is not accessible all aug s link is not accessible here is one sample document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service meta github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5038,11986363483.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-07 19:10:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""Download PDF"" option is not enabled for Azure Architecture center",Pri3 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged,"Hi Team,
Download PDF option is presently not enabled for offline reference of complete documentation of Azure architecture center. However, I could see its enabled for ""Get started guide for Azure developers"".
Can you please enable this option for Azure architecture center as well?
",1.0,"""Download PDF"" option is not enabled for Azure Architecture center - Hi Team,
Download PDF option is presently not enabled for offline reference of complete documentation of Azure architecture center. However, I could see its enabled for ""Get started guide for Azure developers"".
Can you please enable this option for Azure architecture center as well?
",1, download pdf option is not enabled for azure architecture center hi team download pdf option is presently not enabled for offline reference of complete documentation of azure architecture center however i could see its enabled for get started guide for azure developers can you please enable this option for azure architecture center as well ,1
4987,11941886650.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 19:15:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Update for revision 4 HLI?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Hi, would it be possible to update this page and diagram for revision 4 of HANA large instances?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 297fe58b-8232-9b2a-c92e-9f7f94ec3e4e
* Version Independent ID: 3da45f17-e475-f23e-c77f-465933ed02f4
* Content: [Run SAP HANA on Azure Large Instances - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @lbrader
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Update for revision 4 HLI? - Hi, would it be possible to update this page and diagram for revision 4 of HANA large instances?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 297fe58b-8232-9b2a-c92e-9f7f94ec3e4e
* Version Independent ID: 3da45f17-e475-f23e-c77f-465933ed02f4
* Content: [Run SAP HANA on Azure Large Instances - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sap/hana-large-instances.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @lbrader
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,update for revision hli hi would it be possible to update this page and diagram for revision of hana large instances document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login lbrader microsoft alias pnp ,1
9766,25166480339.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 21:22:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing Decision Tree diagram,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
This page appears to be broken. It no longer includes the decision tree. See attached.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 88559925-9b9e-d9b3-ddb6-08306692c17b
* Version Independent ID: a25055cb-7cfe-28a0-1c66-06172c037128
* Content: [Data store decision tree - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing Decision Tree diagram -
This page appears to be broken. It no longer includes the decision tree. See attached.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 88559925-9b9e-d9b3-ddb6-08306692c17b
* Version Independent ID: a25055cb-7cfe-28a0-1c66-06172c037128
* Content: [Data store decision tree - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/data-store-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dsk-2015
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing decision tree diagram this page appears to be broken it no longer includes the decision tree see attached document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dsk microsoft alias pnp ,1
10391,26900590838.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-06 15:23:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Gateway After Firewall Architecture,cxp doc-idea triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"Hello Microsoft,
It's not an Issue, it's more or less a suggestion to improve documentation and to help other colleagues that face the same issue with this architecture.
For the Gateway After Firewall Architecture, one statement is not entirely true and can be obtain if you correlate logs from the Firewall with the logs from the Web Application firewall:
- The application can't see the original source IP address of the web traffic; the Azure Firewall SNATs the packets as they come in to the virtual network. To avoid this problem, use [Azure Front Door] in front of the firewall. Azure Front Door injects the client's IP address as an HTTP header before it enters the Azure virtual network.
In the AzureDiagnostics table you can correlate the logs from Firewall with the logs from WAF by the TimeStamp and by the Source Client Port information which is present and carried forward by the Firewall in the SNAT further to the WAF in this Architecture. By looking at this is you are able to track back the Public source IP of the client.
Example:
AzureDiagnostics on AzureFirewall
msg_s : TCP request from 91.209.8.29:15919 to x.x.x.x:443 was DNAT'ed to 10.x.x.x:443
AzureDiagnostics on WAF/AppGateway
clientPort_d 15919 ;
Same as the Public IP source port above; because it's carried by the static NAT further. Correlate this with the TimeStamp (between 2-3 seconds around the area where the log appears) and you are able to track the public IPs.
Regards,
Bogdan SAVA
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall, App Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1.0,"Gateway After Firewall Architecture - Hello Microsoft,
It's not an Issue, it's more or less a suggestion to improve documentation and to help other colleagues that face the same issue with this architecture.
For the Gateway After Firewall Architecture, one statement is not entirely true and can be obtain if you correlate logs from the Firewall with the logs from the Web Application firewall:
- The application can't see the original source IP address of the web traffic; the Azure Firewall SNATs the packets as they come in to the virtual network. To avoid this problem, use [Azure Front Door] in front of the firewall. Azure Front Door injects the client's IP address as an HTTP header before it enters the Azure virtual network.
In the AzureDiagnostics table you can correlate the logs from Firewall with the logs from WAF by the TimeStamp and by the Source Client Port information which is present and carried forward by the Firewall in the SNAT further to the WAF in this Architecture. By looking at this is you are able to track back the Public source IP of the client.
Example:
AzureDiagnostics on AzureFirewall
msg_s : TCP request from 91.209.8.29:15919 to x.x.x.x:443 was DNAT'ed to 10.x.x.x:443
AzureDiagnostics on WAF/AppGateway
clientPort_d 15919 ;
Same as the Public IP source port above; because it's carried by the static NAT further. Correlate this with the TimeStamp (between 2-3 seconds around the area where the log appears) and you are able to track the public IPs.
Regards,
Bogdan SAVA
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall, App Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1,gateway after firewall architecture hello microsoft it s not an issue it s more or less a suggestion to improve documentation and to help other colleagues that face the same issue with this architecture for the gateway after firewall architecture one statement is not entirely true and can be obtain if you correlate logs from the firewall with the logs from the web application firewall the application can t see the original source ip address of the web traffic the azure firewall snats the packets as they come in to the virtual network to avoid this problem use in front of the firewall azure front door injects the client s ip address as an http header before it enters the azure virtual network in the azurediagnostics table you can correlate the logs from firewall with the logs from waf by the timestamp and by the source client port information which is present and carried forward by the firewall in the snat further to the waf in this architecture by looking at this is you are able to track back the public source ip of the client example azurediagnostics on azurefirewall msg s tcp request from to x x x x was dnat ed to x x x azurediagnostics on waf appgateway clientport d same as the public ip source port above because it s carried by the static nat further correlate this with the timestamp between seconds around the area where the log appears and you are able to track the public ips regards bogdan sava document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login erjosito microsoft alias jomore ,1
3881,10239387010.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:07:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Autoscaling documentation not complete,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"Autoscaling documentation and pointers to specific detailed sections are available for Service Fabric, VM Scale Sets, App Services, Azure Functions, Cloud Service etc However, additional information for Azure Kubernetes Service, Azure Container Service and Azure Container Instances should be added.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 98e6cd92-676a-6d6f-2ea8-ebe9301f59a9
* Version Independent ID: edfbb571-5bcf-2339-2cce-5e6a22fd591c
* Content: [Autoscaling guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/auto-scaling#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/auto-scaling.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/auto-scaling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Autoscaling documentation not complete - Autoscaling documentation and pointers to specific detailed sections are available for Service Fabric, VM Scale Sets, App Services, Azure Functions, Cloud Service etc However, additional information for Azure Kubernetes Service, Azure Container Service and Azure Container Instances should be added.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 98e6cd92-676a-6d6f-2ea8-ebe9301f59a9
* Version Independent ID: edfbb571-5bcf-2339-2cce-5e6a22fd591c
* Content: [Autoscaling guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/auto-scaling#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/auto-scaling.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/auto-scaling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,autoscaling documentation not complete autoscaling documentation and pointers to specific detailed sections are available for service fabric vm scale sets app services azure functions cloud service etc however additional information for azure kubernetes service azure container service and azure container instances should be added document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5450,12498343120.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 18:06:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Data Flow Description for point 6 should be related to AAS on top of Synapse,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"the Data flow for point 6 description is : Run ad hoc queries directly on data within Azure Databricks.
Its should be related to Azure Analysis Service on top of Synapse
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Data Flow Description for point 6 should be related to AAS on top of Synapse - the Data flow for point 6 description is : Run ad hoc queries directly on data within Azure Databricks.
Its should be related to Azure Analysis Service on top of Synapse
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,data flow description for point should be related to aas on top of synapse the data flow for point description is run ad hoc queries directly on data within azure databricks its should be related to azure analysis service on top of synapse document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10717,27320216312.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-24 19:06:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Alternative caching options,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Are there alternatives to Redis (Azure Cache for Redis)? If yes, what are they and their pros & cons?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: be785717-ca5e-f3d6-8e60-4005d9503d08
* Version Independent ID: 3ce414e5-d923-0488-ff11-3aa8bd4c2d1e
* Content: [Caching guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/caching)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/caching.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/caching.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Alternative caching options -
Are there alternatives to Redis (Azure Cache for Redis)? If yes, what are they and their pros & cons?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: be785717-ca5e-f3d6-8e60-4005d9503d08
* Version Independent ID: 3ce414e5-d923-0488-ff11-3aa8bd4c2d1e
* Content: [Caching guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/caching)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/caching.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/caching.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,alternative caching options are there alternatives to redis azure cache for redis if yes what are they and their pros cons document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
10304,26694945242.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-27 09:32:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Pricing not available,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"The sentence ""The pricing for CluedIn is open and transparent. You can see the pricing on their [website](https://www.cluedin.com/)."" does not seem to be correct. Pricing is not indicated on the website.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 278e83ef-9b90-cb2d-9ff6-0dd8f5ff1b87
* Version Independent ID: 7e63fe30-9080-9207-ad0f-62263379de0c
* Content: [Master data management with Azure and CluedIn - Azure Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/cluedin)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/cluedin.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/data/cluedin.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **Oliver.Kaae**",2.0,"Pricing not available - The sentence ""The pricing for CluedIn is open and transparent. You can see the pricing on their [website](https://www.cluedin.com/)."" does not seem to be correct. Pricing is not indicated on the website.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 278e83ef-9b90-cb2d-9ff6-0dd8f5ff1b87
* Version Independent ID: 7e63fe30-9080-9207-ad0f-62263379de0c
* Content: [Master data management with Azure and CluedIn - Azure Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/cluedin)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/cluedin.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/data/cluedin.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **Oliver.Kaae**",1,pricing not available the sentence the pricing for cluedin is open and transparent you can see the pricing on their does not seem to be correct pricing is not indicated on the website document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias oliver kaae ,1
7678,18839142199.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-11 07:11:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Typo - Repeated Word,doc-bug cxp triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc,"
Under Reference Architecture -> AKS baseline cluster -> Cluster Access -> Local Accounts
The second sentence has the word ""access"" twice in a row.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Typo - Repeated Word -
Under Reference Architecture -> AKS baseline cluster -> Cluster Access -> Local Accounts
The second sentence has the word ""access"" twice in a row.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo repeated word under reference architecture aks baseline cluster cluster access local accounts the second sentence has the word access twice in a row document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9572,24846036732.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-26 15:56:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Diagram is a hidden circle,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"The diagram is actually the very same circle used in another website:
Maybe aligning the images would make some sense?!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c64e76ff-1388-ed4d-4c8b-92bb4419cc61
* Version Independent ID: 3cdec53f-38ba-c0bb-3315-5ad8b357aabf
* Content: [MLOps for Python with Azure Machine Learning - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/mlops-python)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/mlops-python.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/mlops-python.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @praneet22
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Diagram is a hidden circle - The diagram is actually the very same circle used in another website:
Maybe aligning the images would make some sense?!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c64e76ff-1388-ed4d-4c8b-92bb4419cc61
* Version Independent ID: 3cdec53f-38ba-c0bb-3315-5ad8b357aabf
* Content: [MLOps for Python with Azure Machine Learning - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/mlops-python)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/mlops-python.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/mlops-python.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @praneet22
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,diagram is a hidden circle the diagram is actually the very same circle used in another website maybe aligning the images would make some sense document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4065,10548187443.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-03 04:39:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Formatting: Missing or incorrect space character,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-design-principles/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement doc-provided triaged,"Section: Cloud Service
- Currently reads: `Web or worker roles are unexpectedlybeing shut down`
- Should read: `Web or worker roles are unexpectedly being shut down`
It looks like the character between the words `unexpectedly` and `being` is not a standard space character, giving the illusion there is a space between the words in the markdown source, however when the page is rentered the words appear concatenated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2b1bb22b-9a56-0cbd-36c5-5f31d571900a
* Version Independent ID: 6a5b36aa-c051-c519-d6cf-61c77c3acb48
* Content: [Failure mode analysis](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/resiliency/failure-mode-analysis#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/resiliency/failure-mode-analysis.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/resiliency/failure-mode-analysis.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Formatting: Missing or incorrect space character - Section: Cloud Service
- Currently reads: `Web or worker roles are unexpectedlybeing shut down`
- Should read: `Web or worker roles are unexpectedly being shut down`
It looks like the character between the words `unexpectedly` and `being` is not a standard space character, giving the illusion there is a space between the words in the markdown source, however when the page is rentered the words appear concatenated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2b1bb22b-9a56-0cbd-36c5-5f31d571900a
* Version Independent ID: 6a5b36aa-c051-c519-d6cf-61c77c3acb48
* Content: [Failure mode analysis](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/resiliency/failure-mode-analysis#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/resiliency/failure-mode-analysis.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/resiliency/failure-mode-analysis.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,formatting missing or incorrect space character section cloud service currently reads web or worker roles are unexpectedlybeing shut down should read web or worker roles are unexpectedly being shut down it looks like the character between the words unexpectedly and being is not a standard space character giving the illusion there is a space between the words in the markdown source however when the page is rentered the words appear concatenated document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6434,14563229258.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-17 01:59:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Logic app,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
Where does Logic App fits in the compute services decision diagram? Please confirm. Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Logic app -
Where does Logic App fits in the compute services decision diagram? Please confirm. Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,logic app where does logic app fits in the compute services decision diagram please confirm thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10460,26992620597.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-09 21:16:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add Azure Container Apps as an equivalence of ECS,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri1,"
It is time to add Azure Container Apps in the equivalence record for ECS.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1.0,"Add Azure Container Apps as an equivalence of ECS -
It is time to add Azure Container Apps in the equivalence record for ECS.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1,add azure container apps as an equivalence of ecs it is time to add azure container apps in the equivalence record for ecs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login edprice msft microsoft alias yuanzhiqu ,1
9151,24098924682.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-19 21:39:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Azure Decision Tree - ""loud optimized"" .. should be ""cloud optimized""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Hey folks,
looking at the doc, I think the decision title for one line is incorrect .. Start -> Migrate -> ""loud optimized"" I think should be ""Cloud Optimized""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**
",1.0,"Azure Decision Tree - ""loud optimized"" .. should be ""cloud optimized"" -
Hey folks,
looking at the doc, I think the decision title for one line is incorrect .. Start -> Migrate -> ""loud optimized"" I think should be ""Cloud Optimized""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**
",1,azure decision tree loud optimized should be cloud optimized hey folks looking at the doc i think the decision title for one line is incorrect start migrate loud optimized i think should be cloud optimized document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
9098,24037700854.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-15 20:51:57,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Outdated security pillar pages?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 well-architected/subsvc,"
Multiple links on this page link to pages which are not in the main navbar on the left side:
* https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/role-of-security
* https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/architecture-type
etc.
It is unclear if these pages are outdated or the navbar items are just missing.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 55000863-6c61-319b-7d0d-5366c403e5e2
* Version Independent ID: 7bb9bb22-f939-6176-236f-79399b6ab2b4
* Content: [Overview of the security pillar - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/overview)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Outdated security pillar pages? -
Multiple links on this page link to pages which are not in the main navbar on the left side:
* https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/role-of-security
* https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/architecture-type
etc.
It is unclear if these pages are outdated or the navbar items are just missing.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 55000863-6c61-319b-7d0d-5366c403e5e2
* Version Independent ID: 7bb9bb22-f939-6176-236f-79399b6ab2b4
* Content: [Overview of the security pillar - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/overview)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,outdated security pillar pages multiple links on this page link to pages which are not in the main navbar on the left side etc it is unclear if these pages are outdated or the navbar items are just missing document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
5406,12428003609.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-25 04:43:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Content is outdated,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"New Azure Services like Azure Synapse Analytics, Power BI Premium Capacity need to be added for OLAP workloads
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 560fb3dc-3a89-aa28-f4c1-564f7920f5ca
* Version Independent ID: b5255403-369f-9324-fb16-02526b24dba6
* Content: [Online analytical processing (OLAP) - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/online-analytical-processing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-analytical-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-analytical-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Content is outdated - New Azure Services like Azure Synapse Analytics, Power BI Premium Capacity need to be added for OLAP workloads
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 560fb3dc-3a89-aa28-f4c1-564f7920f5ca
* Version Independent ID: b5255403-369f-9324-fb16-02526b24dba6
* Content: [Online analytical processing (OLAP) - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/online-analytical-processing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-analytical-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/relational-data/online-analytical-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,content is outdated new azure services like azure synapse analytics power bi premium capacity need to be added for olap workloads document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
10147,26398017826.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-12 21:25:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Product names are given for time series storage architecture, but details are missing",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"In the [Architecture](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/time-series#architecture) section, product names that could be used for storage of time series are mentioned but details are missing.
If possible, I'd like to see a table / comparison of those products
- pros
- cons
- some pointers how to best approach it - e.g. Blob Storage is mentioned but in that case the developer will be required to add some structure. Storing a JSON file with timestamp as filename? Other ideas?
- constraints to keep in mind
- what data types is it suitable for?
- what analytics products does it work with?
- best practices
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87bde15d-d343-b84d-b77f-55b8e3f12638
* Version Independent ID: 9d35a3eb-707b-47f6-68bc-3f22fee4c78c
* Content: [Time series data - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/time-series#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/time-series.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/scenarios/time-series.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Product names are given for time series storage architecture, but details are missing - In the [Architecture](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/time-series#architecture) section, product names that could be used for storage of time series are mentioned but details are missing.
If possible, I'd like to see a table / comparison of those products
- pros
- cons
- some pointers how to best approach it - e.g. Blob Storage is mentioned but in that case the developer will be required to add some structure. Storing a JSON file with timestamp as filename? Other ideas?
- constraints to keep in mind
- what data types is it suitable for?
- what analytics products does it work with?
- best practices
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87bde15d-d343-b84d-b77f-55b8e3f12638
* Version Independent ID: 9d35a3eb-707b-47f6-68bc-3f22fee4c78c
* Content: [Time series data - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/scenarios/time-series#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/scenarios/time-series.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/scenarios/time-series.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,product names are given for time series storage architecture but details are missing in the section product names that could be used for storage of time series are mentioned but details are missing if possible i d like to see a table comparison of those products pros cons some pointers how to best approach it e g blob storage is mentioned but in that case the developer will be required to add some structure storing a json file with timestamp as filename other ideas constraints to keep in mind what data types is it suitable for what analytics products does it work with best practices document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
7654,18768055784.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-06 09:36:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,cqrs Sample From Microsoft,architecture-center/svc design-pattern/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [What is the CQRS pattern? - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"cqrs Sample From Microsoft -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [What is the CQRS pattern? - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,cqrs sample from microsoft document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4222,10739782097.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-29 16:57:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Readiness and liveness probes considerations ,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"""Sometimes readiness probes are used to check dependent services. For example, if a pod has a dependency on a database, the *liveness probe* might check the database connection. [...]""
Didn't you mean to write ""readiness probe"" in the second sentence?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Readiness and liveness probes considerations - ""Sometimes readiness probes are used to check dependent services. For example, if a pod has a dependency on a database, the *liveness probe* might check the database connection. [...]""
Didn't you mean to write ""readiness probe"" in the second sentence?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c5e2e444-d6b9-962e-56d4-8d1f3508ba9e
* Version Independent ID: 061ea6aa-353b-a98d-cbf6-639209a5fd1b
* Content: [Microservices architecture on Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/microservices/aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/microservices/aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,readiness and liveness probes considerations sometimes readiness probes are used to check dependent services for example if a pod has a dependency on a database the liveness probe might check the database connection didn t you mean to write readiness probe in the second sentence document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
7790,19340572909.0,IssuesEvent,2021-12-15 03:39:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incomplete page,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
There is not very much content on this page, it looks like the primary section of the page may not have been published.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 86da7d5a-f642-2f32-df67-7bfb766afbb9
* Version Independent ID: 86da7d5a-f642-2f32-df67-7bfb766afbb9
* Content: [Service-specific guidance for a multitenant solution - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/multitenant/service/overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/multitenant/service/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/multitenant/service/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @johndowns
* Microsoft Alias: **jodowns**",1.0,"Incomplete page -
There is not very much content on this page, it looks like the primary section of the page may not have been published.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 86da7d5a-f642-2f32-df67-7bfb766afbb9
* Version Independent ID: 86da7d5a-f642-2f32-df67-7bfb766afbb9
* Content: [Service-specific guidance for a multitenant solution - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/multitenant/service/overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/multitenant/service/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/multitenant/service/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @johndowns
* Microsoft Alias: **jodowns**",1,incomplete page there is not very much content on this page it looks like the primary section of the page may not have been published document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login johndowns microsoft alias jodowns ,1
3775,10114312028.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-30 18:52:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can you,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement needs-art triaged,"Include the visio file for the diagram above?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f3d6aeb8-ec6a-4d27-2d10-1b404de450b7
* Version Independent ID: 65b165e4-a2e4-7f57-19eb-884fce7bf880
* Content: [Build an enterprise-grade conversational bot](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/conversational-bot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/conversational-bot.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/conversational-bot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @roalexan
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can you - Include the visio file for the diagram above?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f3d6aeb8-ec6a-4d27-2d10-1b404de450b7
* Version Independent ID: 65b165e4-a2e4-7f57-19eb-884fce7bf880
* Content: [Build an enterprise-grade conversational bot](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/ai/conversational-bot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/ai/conversational-bot.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/ai/conversational-bot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @roalexan
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can you include the visio file for the diagram above document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login roalexan microsoft alias pnp ,1
6396,14500086813.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-11 17:33:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Change name to Strangler Fig Application,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"
Martin Fowler has changed the name to Strangler Fig Application to avoid the violent connotation. From his own revision comment:
> Changed URL and name to Strangler Fig Application April 29 2019
>
> I thought this post was a nice metaphor, but didn't expect the degree that it would grow in popularity (in recent months it gets over 3000 page views a month). The popularity is nice, but there is a problem. The original post was entitled “Strangler Application”, and when used, the pattern is often referred to as a “strangler”. But its usage often gets separated from its metaphorical root, and takes on a unpleasantly violent connotation.
>
> Some people, therefore, have advocated avoiding or changing the name. I don't have any great objection to that, I haven't used the name in my own writing since that original posting. But the trouble with attempting a rename, is that once a name has lodged itself in a community's mind, it's very hard to dislodge.
>
> Recently I thought of a small tweak that might help things a little. If I rename the post to “Strangler Fig Application”, and use the term “Strangler Fig” as much as possible, then hopefully that would reduce the violent connotation by reinforcing the metaphorical link that is the whole point of the name. Because it's a small change, maybe it will spread enough to be worthwhile, and it's not much effort, so seems worth a try.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5b580bcd-bba9-0799-6f9f-4b0e2ae9739f
* Version Independent ID: 6603e60e-ad3b-9aec-0633-eed88c218561
* Content: [Strangler pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/strangler)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/strangler.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/strangler.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Change name to Strangler Fig Application -
Martin Fowler has changed the name to Strangler Fig Application to avoid the violent connotation. From his own revision comment:
> Changed URL and name to Strangler Fig Application April 29 2019
>
> I thought this post was a nice metaphor, but didn't expect the degree that it would grow in popularity (in recent months it gets over 3000 page views a month). The popularity is nice, but there is a problem. The original post was entitled “Strangler Application”, and when used, the pattern is often referred to as a “strangler”. But its usage often gets separated from its metaphorical root, and takes on a unpleasantly violent connotation.
>
> Some people, therefore, have advocated avoiding or changing the name. I don't have any great objection to that, I haven't used the name in my own writing since that original posting. But the trouble with attempting a rename, is that once a name has lodged itself in a community's mind, it's very hard to dislodge.
>
> Recently I thought of a small tweak that might help things a little. If I rename the post to “Strangler Fig Application”, and use the term “Strangler Fig” as much as possible, then hopefully that would reduce the violent connotation by reinforcing the metaphorical link that is the whole point of the name. Because it's a small change, maybe it will spread enough to be worthwhile, and it's not much effort, so seems worth a try.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5b580bcd-bba9-0799-6f9f-4b0e2ae9739f
* Version Independent ID: 6603e60e-ad3b-9aec-0633-eed88c218561
* Content: [Strangler pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/strangler)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/strangler.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/strangler.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,change name to strangler fig application martin fowler has changed the name to strangler fig application to avoid the violent connotation from his own revision comment changed url and name to strangler fig application april i thought this post was a nice metaphor but didn t expect the degree that it would grow in popularity in recent months it gets over page views a month the popularity is nice but there is a problem the original post was entitled “strangler application” and when used the pattern is often referred to as a “strangler” but its usage often gets separated from its metaphorical root and takes on a unpleasantly violent connotation some people therefore have advocated avoiding or changing the name i don t have any great objection to that i haven t used the name in my own writing since that original posting but the trouble with attempting a rename is that once a name has lodged itself in a community s mind it s very hard to dislodge recently i thought of a small tweak that might help things a little if i rename the post to “strangler fig application” and use the term “strangler fig” as much as possible then hopefully that would reduce the violent connotation by reinforcing the metaphorical link that is the whole point of the name because it s a small change maybe it will spread enough to be worthwhile and it s not much effort so seems worth a try document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4018,10476893460.0,IssuesEvent,2019-09-23 19:38:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Conflicting info re: AD DS support for SharePoint 2016?,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
This article states that:
_SharePoint Server 2016 also supports using Azure Active Directory Domain Services. Azure AD Domain Services provides managed domain services, so that you don't need to deploy and manage domain controllers in Azure._
But then further down:
_The domain-level service accounts used to run SharePoint Server 2016 require Windows Server AD domain controllers for domain-join and authentication processes. Azure Active Directory Domain Services can't be used for this purpose._
Which statement is correct?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6d93eb87-54cb-cf38-dfae-0ebe7579d608
* Version Independent ID: c7ac665e-d194-ab07-c1bb-5d5a3049c5ec
* Content: [Run a highly available SharePoint Server 2016 farm in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sharepoint/)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sharepoint/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sharepoint/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Conflicting info re: AD DS support for SharePoint 2016? -
This article states that:
_SharePoint Server 2016 also supports using Azure Active Directory Domain Services. Azure AD Domain Services provides managed domain services, so that you don't need to deploy and manage domain controllers in Azure._
But then further down:
_The domain-level service accounts used to run SharePoint Server 2016 require Windows Server AD domain controllers for domain-join and authentication processes. Azure Active Directory Domain Services can't be used for this purpose._
Which statement is correct?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6d93eb87-54cb-cf38-dfae-0ebe7579d608
* Version Independent ID: c7ac665e-d194-ab07-c1bb-5d5a3049c5ec
* Content: [Run a highly available SharePoint Server 2016 farm in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sharepoint/)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sharepoint/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/sharepoint/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @njray
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,conflicting info re ad ds support for sharepoint this article states that sharepoint server also supports using azure active directory domain services azure ad domain services provides managed domain services so that you don t need to deploy and manage domain controllers in azure but then further down the domain level service accounts used to run sharepoint server require windows server ad domain controllers for domain join and authentication processes azure active directory domain services can t be used for this purpose which statement is correct document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id dfae version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login njray microsoft alias pnp ,1
9598,24877644059.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-27 20:40:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,What about Azure Container Apps?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
This decision chart is great to summarize all the choices available for Compute.
However with Azure Container Apps in GA, it will interesting to see in which category it will be placed.
Would be great if it can be added here.
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/apps-on-azure-blog/introducing-azure-container-apps-a-serverless-container-service/ba-p/2867265#:~:text=%20Introducing%20Azure%20Container%20Apps%3A%20a%20serverless%20container,management.%20Azure%20Container%20Apps%20streamlines%20the...%20More%20
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"What about Azure Container Apps? -
This decision chart is great to summarize all the choices available for Compute.
However with Azure Container Apps in GA, it will interesting to see in which category it will be placed.
Would be great if it can be added here.
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/apps-on-azure-blog/introducing-azure-container-apps-a-serverless-container-service/ba-p/2867265#:~:text=%20Introducing%20Azure%20Container%20Apps%3A%20a%20serverless%20container,management.%20Azure%20Container%20Apps%20streamlines%20the...%20More%20
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,what about azure container apps this decision chart is great to summarize all the choices available for compute however with azure container apps in ga it will interesting to see in which category it will be placed would be great if it can be added here document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9686,25033872359.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-04 14:31:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Availability Options for AD DS is Availability Zones also supported,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
Under the section Availability Considerations, the article states that the Domain Controllers should be placed in an Availability Set. My question is whether Availability Zones are also supported, it is just the article needs updating or is there another technical reason for stating Availability Sets. The region I would be looking to deploy the Domain Controllers does support Availability Zones. Feedback greatly appreciated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Availability Options for AD DS is Availability Zones also supported -
[Enter feedback here]
Under the section Availability Considerations, the article states that the Domain Controllers should be placed in an Availability Set. My question is whether Availability Zones are also supported, it is just the article needs updating or is there another technical reason for stating Availability Sets. The region I would be looking to deploy the Domain Controllers does support Availability Zones. Feedback greatly appreciated.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,availability options for ad ds is availability zones also supported under the section availability considerations the article states that the domain controllers should be placed in an availability set my question is whether availability zones are also supported it is just the article needs updating or is there another technical reason for stating availability sets the region i would be looking to deploy the domain controllers does support availability zones feedback greatly appreciated document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
5005,11942536121.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 21:11:52,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Downloadable PDF Document,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"A great resource for Azure architecture here. Is it possible to download the document in pdf like other Azure doc sites?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Downloadable PDF Document - A great resource for Azure architecture here. Is it possible to download the document in pdf like other Azure doc sites?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,downloadable pdf document a great resource for azure architecture here is it possible to download the document in pdf like other azure doc sites document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
7212,17093243415.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-08 20:38:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Defender Surface Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules and FSLogix,Product-bug architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author azure-guide/subsvc triaged,"Using the default [SetTempToLocalPath](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/fslogix/profile-container-configuration-reference#settemptolocalpath) setting, Defender [ASR](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/defender-endpoint/attack-surface-reduction) was blocking javascript files required for the office sign-in page to load.
#2107060040003922 - FSLogix
#26280461 - Defender
It's unclear at the moment from the the two tickets above if defender is having an issue because FSLogix is storing the INetCache files in a different location and I hope to have more clarity before the end of the week as to whether the current guidance is to add additional exclusions when FSLogix and Office are used together, or if Defender wants to address this issue from their end.
At the very least, if anyone has problems with office sign-in's adding the following exclusions may resolve your issue:
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\CommonDiagnostics?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\ConvergedLogin_PCore_?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\convergedlogin_ppassword_?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\convergedlogin_ptiles_?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\frameworksupport.min_?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\hrd.min?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\jsonstrings?.js
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#antivirus-exclusions)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Defender Surface Attack Surface Reduction (ASR) rules and FSLogix - Using the default [SetTempToLocalPath](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/fslogix/profile-container-configuration-reference#settemptolocalpath) setting, Defender [ASR](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/defender-endpoint/attack-surface-reduction) was blocking javascript files required for the office sign-in page to load.
#2107060040003922 - FSLogix
#26280461 - Defender
It's unclear at the moment from the the two tickets above if defender is having an issue because FSLogix is storing the INetCache files in a different location and I hope to have more clarity before the end of the week as to whether the current guidance is to add additional exclusions when FSLogix and Office are used together, or if Defender wants to address this issue from their end.
At the very least, if anyone has problems with office sign-in's adding the following exclusions may resolve your issue:
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\CommonDiagnostics?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\ConvergedLogin_PCore_?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\convergedlogin_ppassword_?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\convergedlogin_ptiles_?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\frameworksupport.min_?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\hrd.min?.js
> C:\Users\*\INetCache\IE\*\jsonstrings?.js
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#antivirus-exclusions)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,defender surface attack surface reduction asr rules and fslogix using the default setting defender was blocking javascript files required for the office sign in page to load fslogix defender it s unclear at the moment from the the two tickets above if defender is having an issue because fslogix is storing the inetcache files in a different location and i hope to have more clarity before the end of the week as to whether the current guidance is to add additional exclusions when fslogix and office are used together or if defender wants to address this issue from their end at the very least if anyone has problems with office sign in s adding the following exclusions may resolve your issue c users inetcache ie commondiagnostics js c users inetcache ie convergedlogin pcore js c users inetcache ie convergedlogin ppassword js c users inetcache ie convergedlogin ptiles js c users inetcache ie frameworksupport min js c users inetcache ie hrd min js c users inetcache ie jsonstrings js document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afaf content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login christiaanbrinkhoff microsoft alias pnp ,1
10359,26837957189.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 21:13:16,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Image example is incorrect.,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 design-pattern/subsvc,"The image on the page is wrong:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/_images/async-request.png
It shows 302 when it should be 202.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Image example is incorrect. - The image on the page is wrong:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/_images/async-request.png
It shows 302 when it should be 202.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6fea460c-4fac-723f-8df4-9d0811855a68
* Version Independent ID: 4be364ca-aee7-7b49-13e1-3a94408ed7b9
* Content: [Asynchronous Request-Reply Pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/async-request-reply)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/async-request-reply.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,image example is incorrect the image on the page is wrong it shows when it should be document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
7444,17839587846.0,IssuesEvent,2021-09-03 08:19:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please add comparisons,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc,"Please add some comparison to this page like is done for the other component pages which actual comparison between the features in AWS and Azure and the Security page for GCP and Azure
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e75f345d-f208-d9c2-f80c-d93db505fab8
* Version Independent ID: 5684d2fa-2569-1c09-ba10-387c75ca7585
* Content: [Multi-cloud security and identity with Azure and AWS - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/security-identity)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/security-identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/security-identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dougkl007
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please add comparisons - Please add some comparison to this page like is done for the other component pages which actual comparison between the features in AWS and Azure and the Security page for GCP and Azure
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e75f345d-f208-d9c2-f80c-d93db505fab8
* Version Independent ID: 5684d2fa-2569-1c09-ba10-387c75ca7585
* Content: [Multi-cloud security and identity with Azure and AWS - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/security-identity)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/security-identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/security-identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dougkl007
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please add comparisons please add some comparison to this page like is done for the other component pages which actual comparison between the features in aws and azure and the security page for gcp and azure document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10174,26459619271.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-16 16:25:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Good,cxp needs-more-info triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Good -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f815c98d-c54b-a6cb-b77b-27c9fa99b3a3
* Version Independent ID: f78699f2-a847-f5cc-54bb-2730faf0b755
* Content: [Build solutions with availability zones - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/high-availability/building-solutions-for-high-availability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,good document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
9723,25104766191.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:53:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Load Balancer is marked as global LB,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
In table ""Azure Load Balancer"" is marked as ""Global"" load balancer. But, as I understand it is not global, but regional.
--
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Load Balancer is marked as global LB -
In table ""Azure Load Balancer"" is marked as ""Global"" load balancer. But, as I understand it is not global, but regional.
--
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure load balancer is marked as global lb in table azure load balancer is marked as global load balancer but as i understand it is not global but regional document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
6281,14108065798.0,IssuesEvent,2020-11-06 17:12:53,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing icons,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"Reporting additional missing icons:
- Private Endpoint
- Azure Container Registry
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Missing icons - Reporting additional missing icons:
- Private Endpoint
- Azure Container Registry
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,missing icons reporting additional missing icons private endpoint azure container registry document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5594,12749516972.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-26 23:08:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,This script does not work and needs to be updated. I am working on that.,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"This script does not work and needs to be updated. I am working on that. -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 636aa53e-3ca0-7a30-fe16-7219f3e8d1a9
* Version Independent ID: c503b39a-cd8a-669a-0882-27d8c13d3570
* Content: [Add IP address spaces to peered virtual networks - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/networking/prefixes/add-ip-space-peered-vnet.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @randycampbell
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,this script does not work and needs to be updated i am working on that document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login randycampbell microsoft alias pnp ,1
9348,24448536984.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-06 20:16:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"To migrate an Oracle database to an Azure... 3rd point ""Figure out how to archive business continuity and disaster recovery requirements."".. Should it not be ""Achieve"" instead of ""Archive""",doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"To migrate an Oracle database to an Azure... 3rd point ""Figure out how to archive business continuity and disaster recovery requirements."".. Should it not be ""Achieve"" instead of ""Archive""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0676437-a746-19de-2df2-7919004a14f0
* Version Independent ID: 35cfce4b-fc76-f140-02fb-9ac605157313
* Content: [Overview of Oracle database migration - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @amberz
* Microsoft Alias: **amberz**",1.0,"To migrate an Oracle database to an Azure... 3rd point ""Figure out how to archive business continuity and disaster recovery requirements."".. Should it not be ""Achieve"" instead of ""Archive"" - To migrate an Oracle database to an Azure... 3rd point ""Figure out how to archive business continuity and disaster recovery requirements."".. Should it not be ""Achieve"" instead of ""Archive""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0676437-a746-19de-2df2-7919004a14f0
* Version Independent ID: 35cfce4b-fc76-f140-02fb-9ac605157313
* Content: [Overview of Oracle database migration - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/oracle-migrate/oracle-migration-overview.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @amberz
* Microsoft Alias: **amberz**",1,to migrate an oracle database to an azure point figure out how to archive business continuity and disaster recovery requirements should it not be achieve instead of archive to migrate an oracle database to an azure point figure out how to archive business continuity and disaster recovery requirements should it not be achieve instead of archive document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login amberz microsoft alias amberz ,1
10219,26543554949.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-19 21:30:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,If you translate to hungarian use a good translator!,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Ide írja be a visszajelzését]
---
#### A dokumentum adatai
⚠ *Ezt a szakaszt ne szerkessze. A szakasz a docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub-problémák hivatkozásaihoz szükséges.*
* ID: 57f4d213-3eb1-5b4c-aa67-116e8fa36f7d
* Version Independent ID: 18199b5a-8f57-6574-c795-7540199ae49a
* Content: [Mikroszolgáltatások CI/CD-folyamata a Kubernetesen - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/hu-hu/azure/architecture/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"If you translate to hungarian use a good translator! -
[Ide írja be a visszajelzését]
---
#### A dokumentum adatai
⚠ *Ezt a szakaszt ne szerkessze. A szakasz a docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub-problémák hivatkozásaihoz szükséges.*
* ID: 57f4d213-3eb1-5b4c-aa67-116e8fa36f7d
* Version Independent ID: 18199b5a-8f57-6574-c795-7540199ae49a
* Content: [Mikroszolgáltatások CI/CD-folyamata a Kubernetesen - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/hu-hu/azure/architecture/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,if you translate to hungarian use a good translator a dokumentum adatai ⚠ ezt a szakaszt ne szerkessze a szakasz a docs microsoft com ➟ github problémák hivatkozásaihoz szükséges id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
3968,10372719136.0,IssuesEvent,2019-09-09 04:27:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Linguistic Analysis API,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"This Cognitive Service does not exist (anymore), please update the documentation accordingly
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f8a51dd9-65b7-5039-06d0-d096ad51d0bb
* Version Independent ID: 9c2c99ed-8d17-7865-e680-2107b7f0ebf1
* Content: [Choosing a natural language processing technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/natural-language-processing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/natural-language-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/natural-language-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Linguistic Analysis API - This Cognitive Service does not exist (anymore), please update the documentation accordingly
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f8a51dd9-65b7-5039-06d0-d096ad51d0bb
* Version Independent ID: 9c2c99ed-8d17-7865-e680-2107b7f0ebf1
* Content: [Choosing a natural language processing technology](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/natural-language-processing#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/natural-language-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/natural-language-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,linguistic analysis api this cognitive service does not exist anymore please update the documentation accordingly document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
3662,9958405814.0,IssuesEvent,2019-07-05 20:58:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"The heading ""What is the virtual datacenter"" is followed by ""What is a virtual datacenter?"".",architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement enterprise-cloud-adoption/subsvc triaged,"Are these headings / paragraphs duplicates?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter#what-is-the-virtual-datacenter
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter#what-is-a-virtual-datacenter
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 82d8a578-f9f1-53af-64d0-808f1fde6c9c
* Version Independent ID: 8a647cb7-2d10-53ed-5459-4356ef607e77
* Content: [Azure virtual datacenter: A network perspective](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter#references)
* Content Source: [docs/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **enterprise-cloud-adoption**
* GitHub Login: @tracsman
* Microsoft Alias: **jonor**",1.0,"The heading ""What is the virtual datacenter"" is followed by ""What is a virtual datacenter?"". - Are these headings / paragraphs duplicates?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter#what-is-the-virtual-datacenter
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter#what-is-a-virtual-datacenter
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 82d8a578-f9f1-53af-64d0-808f1fde6c9c
* Version Independent ID: 8a647cb7-2d10-53ed-5459-4356ef607e77
* Content: [Azure virtual datacenter: A network perspective](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter#references)
* Content Source: [docs/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/vdc/networking-virtual-datacenter.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **enterprise-cloud-adoption**
* GitHub Login: @tracsman
* Microsoft Alias: **jonor**",1,the heading what is the virtual datacenter is followed by what is a virtual datacenter are these headings paragraphs duplicates document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service enterprise cloud adoption github login tracsman microsoft alias jonor ,1
3880,10239379356.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:06:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please update to reference Azure Functions,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"Thank you for this doc, has lots of good general info regarding implementing background processing.
Please update to reference Azure Functions. Please also update to replace references for depreciated Azure Scheduler to instead reference Scheduled Azure Functions and/or Azure Logic Apps Scheduler.
Thanks!
aaronse
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs#schedule-driven-triggers)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please update to reference Azure Functions - Thank you for this doc, has lots of good general info regarding implementing background processing.
Please update to reference Azure Functions. Please also update to replace references for depreciated Azure Scheduler to instead reference Scheduled Azure Functions and/or Azure Logic Apps Scheduler.
Thanks!
aaronse
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs#schedule-driven-triggers)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please update to reference azure functions thank you for this doc has lots of good general info regarding implementing background processing please update to reference azure functions please also update to replace references for depreciated azure scheduler to instead reference scheduled azure functions and or azure logic apps scheduler thanks aaronse document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id dcef content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5581,12745404572.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-26 14:12:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,404 error on ARM templates link,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Under the components section, the following link fails (404): [Azure Resource Manager templates](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/virtual-machines-windows-cli-deploy-templates)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3bf4b377-2f24-8bcb-0e7a-a353564fb0cb
* Version Independent ID: fd0164e3-7acf-8dca-ff63-44d8055919dc
* Content: [HPC cluster deployed in the cloud - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/hpc-cluster)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/hpc-cluster.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/hpc-cluster.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"404 error on ARM templates link - Under the components section, the following link fails (404): [Azure Resource Manager templates](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/api/Redirect/documentation/articles/virtual-machines-windows-cli-deploy-templates)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3bf4b377-2f24-8bcb-0e7a-a353564fb0cb
* Version Independent ID: fd0164e3-7acf-8dca-ff63-44d8055919dc
* Content: [HPC cluster deployed in the cloud - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/hpc-cluster)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/hpc-cluster.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/hpc-cluster.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1, error on arm templates link under the components section the following link fails document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
11339,30117798473.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-30 12:57:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,No queue?,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
It is a bit disappointing that you don't have a temporal decoupling option on the flow path, at all, but model the system as synchronous all the way through to the databases. A system that needs robustness and high reliability will typically decouple the frontend (API) from the backend (DB) using a messaging layer, for instance using Azure Service Bus and/or Azure Event Hubs.
A cache layer should probably also feature a bit more prominently in the diagram since product catalog browsing makes up 75% of the presented scenario's traffic.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Version Independent ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Content: [Scalable cloud applications and SRE - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **subhajch**",1.0,"No queue? -
It is a bit disappointing that you don't have a temporal decoupling option on the flow path, at all, but model the system as synchronous all the way through to the databases. A system that needs robustness and high reliability will typically decouple the frontend (API) from the backend (DB) using a messaging layer, for instance using Azure Service Bus and/or Azure Event Hubs.
A cache layer should probably also feature a bit more prominently in the diagram since product catalog browsing makes up 75% of the presented scenario's traffic.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Version Independent ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Content: [Scalable cloud applications and SRE - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **subhajch**",1,no queue it is a bit disappointing that you don t have a temporal decoupling option on the flow path at all but model the system as synchronous all the way through to the databases a system that needs robustness and high reliability will typically decouple the frontend api from the backend db using a messaging layer for instance using azure service bus and or azure event hubs a cache layer should probably also feature a bit more prominently in the diagram since product catalog browsing makes up of the presented scenario s traffic document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login martinekuan microsoft alias subhajch ,1
9670,25017631126.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:21:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio files do not match images,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Hi. The Visio files from the download links do not match the diagrams shown.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9961de25-4a65-ef77-079e-cf0359ec5857
* Version Independent ID: 7b9bb7e7-ef88-a37f-5ca0-5f8a07f0f9d6
* Content: [Run SAP NetWeaver in Windows on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/sap-netweaver)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/sap-netweaver.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/sap/sap-netweaver.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @bqtrinh
* Microsoft Alias: **bentrin**",2.0,"Visio files do not match images -
Hi. The Visio files from the download links do not match the diagrams shown.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9961de25-4a65-ef77-079e-cf0359ec5857
* Version Independent ID: 7b9bb7e7-ef88-a37f-5ca0-5f8a07f0f9d6
* Content: [Run SAP NetWeaver in Windows on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/sap/sap-netweaver)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/sap/sap-netweaver.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/sap/sap-netweaver.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @bqtrinh
* Microsoft Alias: **bentrin**",1,visio files do not match images hi the visio files from the download links do not match the diagrams shown document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login bqtrinh microsoft alias bentrin ,1
10232,26562081743.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-20 16:41:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Anti-corruption layer pattern expressed in terms of services,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 design-pattern/subsvc,"I'm surprised to see the anti-corruption layer expressed as a physical service between other services. The pattern really has nothing to do with physical deployments. When I host multiple bounded contexts in a single process, I still want anti-corruption layers between these contexts.
**Then, a lot of the mentioned downsides, like latency, do not apply.**
Feels like devs are getting wrong-footed here and immediately are put in a multi-process mindset.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50b204d4-aa9e-127b-5d80-6b3a80128e7f
* Version Independent ID: 54ffc524-0c3a-b349-f89a-459271f6c980
* Content: [Anti-Corruption Layer pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/anti-corruption-layer)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/anti-corruption-layer.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/anti-corruption-layer.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Anti-corruption layer pattern expressed in terms of services - I'm surprised to see the anti-corruption layer expressed as a physical service between other services. The pattern really has nothing to do with physical deployments. When I host multiple bounded contexts in a single process, I still want anti-corruption layers between these contexts.
**Then, a lot of the mentioned downsides, like latency, do not apply.**
Feels like devs are getting wrong-footed here and immediately are put in a multi-process mindset.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50b204d4-aa9e-127b-5d80-6b3a80128e7f
* Version Independent ID: 54ffc524-0c3a-b349-f89a-459271f6c980
* Content: [Anti-Corruption Layer pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/anti-corruption-layer)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/anti-corruption-layer.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/anti-corruption-layer.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,anti corruption layer pattern expressed in terms of services i m surprised to see the anti corruption layer expressed as a physical service between other services the pattern really has nothing to do with physical deployments when i host multiple bounded contexts in a single process i still want anti corruption layers between these contexts then a lot of the mentioned downsides like latency do not apply feels like devs are getting wrong footed here and immediately are put in a multi process mindset document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10198,26499347093.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-18 09:05:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Sustainability pillar in well architected framework. ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"AWS has released a new tenant in their well-architected framework named Sustainability. Time to revisit this?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 111d7b49-94b6-abd9-c21a-fb0bace59114
* Version Independent ID: 5d9aa212-cbb2-803c-2ea9-6da76c7a9394
* Content: [Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **v-stacywray**",1.0,"Sustainability pillar in well architected framework. - AWS has released a new tenant in their well-architected framework named Sustainability. Time to revisit this?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 111d7b49-94b6-abd9-c21a-fb0bace59114
* Version Independent ID: 5d9aa212-cbb2-803c-2ea9-6da76c7a9394
* Content: [Microsoft Azure Well-Architected Framework - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **v-stacywray**",1,sustainability pillar in well architected framework aws has released a new tenant in their well architected framework named sustainability time to revisit this document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login david stanford microsoft alias v stacywray ,1
9641,24953839033.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-01 09:55:39,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How about contextual / content specific links or an example ?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
So you have a link in the ""Components"" section
_Xamarin: Create mobile apps for iOS and Android using C# and Azure SDKs._
The issue is it takes you to the Xamarin front page ...
How about linking me to information about each step ...
I have been doing mobile and building WebAPI backends fora long time and getting mobile to work with Azure is a PITA.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 38528b0d-5156-c944-25c6-8027cda69322
* Version Independent ID: 222b8546-a265-1d0e-f2ac-147c4ae791b9
* Content: [Task-Based Consumer Mobile App - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/task-based-consumer-mobile-app)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/task-based-consumer-mobile-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/task-based-consumer-mobile-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"How about contextual / content specific links or an example ? -
So you have a link in the ""Components"" section
_Xamarin: Create mobile apps for iOS and Android using C# and Azure SDKs._
The issue is it takes you to the Xamarin front page ...
How about linking me to information about each step ...
I have been doing mobile and building WebAPI backends fora long time and getting mobile to work with Azure is a PITA.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 38528b0d-5156-c944-25c6-8027cda69322
* Version Independent ID: 222b8546-a265-1d0e-f2ac-147c4ae791b9
* Content: [Task-Based Consumer Mobile App - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/task-based-consumer-mobile-app)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/task-based-consumer-mobile-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/task-based-consumer-mobile-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,how about contextual content specific links or an example so you have a link in the components section xamarin create mobile apps for ios and android using c and azure sdks the issue is it takes you to the xamarin front page how about linking me to information about each step i have been doing mobile and building webapi backends fora long time and getting mobile to work with azure is a pita document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10261,26625684118.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-24 14:24:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,More detail info needed ,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri3,"For this document it mentioned using dynamics 365 as a service to manage product source, but as I know dynamics 365 using dataverse as it's storage which is not listed in the picture.
So could you please add more detail design in this document about dynamics 365 to azure microservice without involving dataverse?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Version Independent ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Content: [Scalable cloud applications and SRE - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **subhajch**",1.0,"More detail info needed - For this document it mentioned using dynamics 365 as a service to manage product source, but as I know dynamics 365 using dataverse as it's storage which is not listed in the picture.
So could you please add more detail design in this document about dynamics 365 to azure microservice without involving dataverse?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Version Independent ID: 34ed51e6-265e-aae0-f552-0900a345b3be
* Content: [Scalable cloud applications and SRE - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/scalable-apps-performance-modeling-site-reliability.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **subhajch**",1,more detail info needed for this document it mentioned using dynamics as a service to manage product source but as i know dynamics using dataverse as it s storage which is not listed in the picture so could you please add more detail design in this document about dynamics to azure microservice without involving dataverse document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login martinekuan microsoft alias subhajch ,1
3888,10239658688.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:48:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"VNET Gateway, Connection and Local Network Gateway",Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc triaged,"I wanted to check about naming rule of Networking resource which includes VNET Gateway, Connection and Local Network Gateway. But I could not find those resources in this page. I hope the limitations of those resources will be written in this page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#naming-rules-and-restrictions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"VNET Gateway, Connection and Local Network Gateway - I wanted to check about naming rule of Networking resource which includes VNET Gateway, Connection and Local Network Gateway. But I could not find those resources in this page. I hope the limitations of those resources will be written in this page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#naming-rules-and-restrictions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,vnet gateway connection and local network gateway i wanted to check about naming rule of networking resource which includes vnet gateway connection and local network gateway but i could not find those resources in this page i hope the limitations of those resources will be written in this page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9517,24734045438.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-20 20:12:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Need to remove the note about SQL Ledger being preview - it has now shipped,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a71d66e9-8380-2cff-a3c2-0a8ba5931d33
* Version Independent ID: a71d66e9-8380-2cff-a3c2-0a8ba5931d33
* Content: [Choose an Azure multiparty computing service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/multiparty-computing-service?source=docs#comparing-options)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/multiparty-computing-service.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/multiparty-computing-service.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Need to remove the note about SQL Ledger being preview - it has now shipped -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a71d66e9-8380-2cff-a3c2-0a8ba5931d33
* Version Independent ID: a71d66e9-8380-2cff-a3c2-0a8ba5931d33
* Content: [Choose an Azure multiparty computing service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/multiparty-computing-service?source=docs#comparing-options)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/multiparty-computing-service.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/multiparty-computing-service.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,need to remove the note about sql ledger being preview it has now shipped document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
4883,11800315989.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-18 17:19:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Thanks a lot, but could you please check the spelling before publishing?",Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-bug triaged,"seperates read and update operations
the flexability created by
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [CQRS pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Thanks a lot, but could you please check the spelling before publishing? - seperates read and update operations
the flexability created by
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [CQRS pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,thanks a lot but could you please check the spelling before publishing seperates read and update operations the flexability created by document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6657,14988266808.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-29 00:50:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Teams exclusions - Foward slash and backslash in section,Pri2 architecture-center/svc azure-guide/subsvc cxp doc-bug triaged,"In the section https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions using Foward slash and backslash
%appdata%/Microsoft/Teams
%appdata%\Microsoft\Teams\meeting-addin\Cache
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Teams exclusions - Foward slash and backslash in section - In the section https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix#teams-exclusions using Foward slash and backslash
%appdata%/Microsoft/Teams
%appdata%\Microsoft\Teams\meeting-addin\Cache
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6386653c-9f82-1ea7-8f29-377be4e5e3b7
* Version Independent ID: a5db2b47-afaf-5917-40cd-740168cad8b6
* Content: [FSLogix for the enterprise - Azure Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/windows-virtual-desktop-fslogix.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @christiaanbrinkhoff
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,teams exclusions foward slash and backslash in section in the section using foward slash and backslash appdata microsoft teams appdata microsoft teams meeting addin cache document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id afaf content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login christiaanbrinkhoff microsoft alias pnp ,1
6817,15369804645.0,IssuesEvent,2021-03-02 07:55:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Wrong link to Microsoft Azure IoT Reference Architecture (PDF),Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Next steps section: Wrong link to Microsoft Azure IoT Reference Architecture (PDF)
It should be https://download.microsoft.com/download/A/4/D/A4DAD253-BC21-41D3-B9D9-87D2AE6F0719/Microsoft_Azure_IoT_Reference_Architecture.pdf
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/iot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Wrong link to Microsoft Azure IoT Reference Architecture (PDF) - Next steps section: Wrong link to Microsoft Azure IoT Reference Architecture (PDF)
It should be https://download.microsoft.com/download/A/4/D/A4DAD253-BC21-41D3-B9D9-87D2AE6F0719/Microsoft_Azure_IoT_Reference_Architecture.pdf
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cf328b1f-6bc5-dff2-619f-82b95030c3cf
* Version Independent ID: 4c7bd8b7-5ebb-5b1e-010b-2acd7fdcec0f
* Content: [Azure IoT reference architecture - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/iot)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/iot.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/iot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,wrong link to microsoft azure iot reference architecture pdf next steps section wrong link to microsoft azure iot reference architecture pdf it should be document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9231,24260942603.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 22:40:16,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Better to have h3 included in the right-side TOC,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
#### feature request
Especially when reading `Technology choices for a message broker` section, I just thought it would be much better if h3 was also included in the right-side TOC.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4503ec57-36ef-8040-b6de-5b5a1fea1590
* Version Independent ID: 509de364-6faf-e11e-41e0-c2f6cb8583f6
* Content: [Asynchronous messaging options in Azure - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/messaging#technology-choices-for-a-message-broker)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/messaging.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/messaging.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Better to have h3 included in the right-side TOC -
#### feature request
Especially when reading `Technology choices for a message broker` section, I just thought it would be much better if h3 was also included in the right-side TOC.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4503ec57-36ef-8040-b6de-5b5a1fea1590
* Version Independent ID: 509de364-6faf-e11e-41e0-c2f6cb8583f6
* Content: [Asynchronous messaging options in Azure - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/messaging#technology-choices-for-a-message-broker)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/messaging.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/messaging.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,better to have included in the right side toc feature request especially when reading technology choices for a message broker section i just thought it would be much better if was also included in the right side toc document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
4984,11939896106.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 15:51:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,What application is DATABASE COPY for?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-design-principles/subsvc,"Use the DATABASE COPY command to create a backup copy of the database with transactional consistency.
It's not clear if this is an SQL command or a command for somewhere else.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cefa78da-afbb-5529-d707-b158d991cb16
* Version Independent ID: 64342775-2746-0e51-9aba-253074530f27
* Content: [Backup and disaster recover for Azure applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/backup-and-recovery#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/backup-and-recovery.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/backup-and-recovery.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"What application is DATABASE COPY for? - Use the DATABASE COPY command to create a backup copy of the database with transactional consistency.
It's not clear if this is an SQL command or a command for somewhere else.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cefa78da-afbb-5529-d707-b158d991cb16
* Version Independent ID: 64342775-2746-0e51-9aba-253074530f27
* Content: [Backup and disaster recover for Azure applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/backup-and-recovery#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/backup-and-recovery.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/backup-and-recovery.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,what application is database copy for use the database copy command to create a backup copy of the database with transactional consistency it s not clear if this is an sql command or a command for somewhere else document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id afbb version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
10295,26676127004.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-26 14:23:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Misleading with link for Azure Stack Hub,assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
In the section Scalability is a link https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-containers#scalability for deploy Functions or App Services to Azure Stack Hub. This is really misleading, because Azure Stack Hub are completely incompatible with Azure Arc. Therefore, I would suggest to replace it with AKS on-prem e.g. on AsHCI https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure-stack/aks-hci/overview AND the deployment guide for Azure Functions with Azure Arc https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/manage-create-arc-environment?tabs=bash.
Thanks Alexander
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4c86282b-a2f2-d987-3562-c68e9f7aa317
* Version Independent ID: 3b035663-dfbc-9d76-b94d-11234ec1eaed
* Content: [Run containers in a hybrid environment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-containers)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-containers.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/hybrid/hybrid-containers.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @pdebruin
* Microsoft Alias: **pidebrui**",2.0,"Misleading with link for Azure Stack Hub -
In the section Scalability is a link https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-containers#scalability for deploy Functions or App Services to Azure Stack Hub. This is really misleading, because Azure Stack Hub are completely incompatible with Azure Arc. Therefore, I would suggest to replace it with AKS on-prem e.g. on AsHCI https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure-stack/aks-hci/overview AND the deployment guide for Azure Functions with Azure Arc https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/app-service/manage-create-arc-environment?tabs=bash.
Thanks Alexander
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4c86282b-a2f2-d987-3562-c68e9f7aa317
* Version Independent ID: 3b035663-dfbc-9d76-b94d-11234ec1eaed
* Content: [Run containers in a hybrid environment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/hybrid-containers)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/hybrid-containers.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/hybrid/hybrid-containers.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @pdebruin
* Microsoft Alias: **pidebrui**",1,misleading with link for azure stack hub in the section scalability is a link for deploy functions or app services to azure stack hub this is really misleading because azure stack hub are completely incompatible with azure arc therefore i would suggest to replace it with aks on prem e g on ashci and the deployment guide for azure functions with azure arc thanks alexander document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id dfbc content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pdebruin microsoft alias pidebrui ,1
10159,26419783803.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-13 19:13:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Not All Page Appears When Export To PDF,assigned-to-author doc-idea triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 design-pattern/subsvc,"When I export to PDF some page doesn't appears for example:
- Circuit Breaker Pattern
- Claim Check
- Compensating Transaction
- Competing Consumers
- Compute Resource Consolidation
- CQRS
- Deployment Stamps
- Event Sourcing
- External Configuration Store
- Federated Identity
Best regards
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771
* Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5
* Content: [Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **masashin**",1.0,"Not All Page Appears When Export To PDF - When I export to PDF some page doesn't appears for example:
- Circuit Breaker Pattern
- Claim Check
- Compensating Transaction
- Competing Consumers
- Compute Resource Consolidation
- CQRS
- Deployment Stamps
- Event Sourcing
- External Configuration Store
- Federated Identity
Best regards
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0a4ecd26-cb7b-4cb2-ae3a-3748ada92771
* Version Independent ID: 97f96179-a22b-8401-a2f4-264a86b5d2f5
* Content: [Cloud design patterns - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **masashin**",1,not all page appears when export to pdf when i export to pdf some page doesn t appears for example circuit breaker pattern claim check compensating transaction competing consumers compute resource consolidation cqrs deployment stamps event sourcing external configuration store federated identity best regards document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login edprice msft microsoft alias masashin ,1
5649,12891424533.0,IssuesEvent,2020-07-13 17:42:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Dear Supporters,",Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Dear Supporters, -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,dear supporters document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9220,24252292176.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 15:00:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Is the Azure Load Balancer pinned or not..?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
Hi,
On your text you are saying:
""_...Because a zone-redundant load balancer is not pinned to a specific zone..._""
But when looking for the picture above of this, I'm understanding that LB is pinned to Zone 2. Even the arrows might give other indication.
If that is not the idea, then should you have similar grey box than Azure Application Gateway have:
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 363ebddf-0348-98e1-fd24-0eef444d383a
* Version Independent ID: e7da7820-925f-2092-c1a4-7a66db3f000d
* Content: [Multi-region load balancing with Traffic Manager and Application Gateway - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/reference-architecture-traffic-manager-application-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/reference-architecture-traffic-manager-application-gateway.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/reference-architecture-traffic-manager-application-gateway.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Is the Azure Load Balancer pinned or not..? -
Hi,
On your text you are saying:
""_...Because a zone-redundant load balancer is not pinned to a specific zone..._""
But when looking for the picture above of this, I'm understanding that LB is pinned to Zone 2. Even the arrows might give other indication.
If that is not the idea, then should you have similar grey box than Azure Application Gateway have:
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 363ebddf-0348-98e1-fd24-0eef444d383a
* Version Independent ID: e7da7820-925f-2092-c1a4-7a66db3f000d
* Content: [Multi-region load balancing with Traffic Manager and Application Gateway - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/high-availability/reference-architecture-traffic-manager-application-gateway)
* Content Source: [docs/high-availability/reference-architecture-traffic-manager-application-gateway.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/high-availability/reference-architecture-traffic-manager-application-gateway.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,is the azure load balancer pinned or not hi on your text you are saying because a zone redundant load balancer is not pinned to a specific zone but when looking for the picture above of this i m understanding that lb is pinned to zone even the arrows might give other indication if that is not the idea then should you have similar grey box than azure application gateway have document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
4595,11404105291.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-31 09:03:52,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,DMZs ? ,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"It would be good to see this with DMZ's for Internet Traffic INbound/Outbound using shared Firewall Appliances along with connectivity from On-Premise as an untrusted site so showing Public and Private DMZ's
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87139748-938e-638e-de1f-94f8becfe1da
* Version Independent ID: b96371e6-defb-3e70-792a-2c0cfdc25b7d
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"DMZs ? - It would be good to see this with DMZ's for Internet Traffic INbound/Outbound using shared Firewall Appliances along with connectivity from On-Premise as an untrusted site so showing Public and Private DMZ's
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87139748-938e-638e-de1f-94f8becfe1da
* Version Independent ID: b96371e6-defb-3e70-792a-2c0cfdc25b7d
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,dmzs it would be good to see this with dmz s for internet traffic inbound outbound using shared firewall appliances along with connectivity from on premise as an untrusted site so showing public and private dmz s document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id defb content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10353,26828436679.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 14:28:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Newer SDKs for Event Hubs and Service Bus should be used in retry guidance,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 best-practice/subsvc,"This page on retry guidance has sections for Event Hubs and Service Bus where the latest SDK is not listed.
Either replace the current content with that for the newer packages Azure.Messaging.EventHubs and Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus.
Or ensure both new and older packages are covered.
If we are covering both, then do emphasize that we recommend the use of the newer ones
@spelluru who is the content developer for these services should be able to help here
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Newer SDKs for Event Hubs and Service Bus should be used in retry guidance - This page on retry guidance has sections for Event Hubs and Service Bus where the latest SDK is not listed.
Either replace the current content with that for the newer packages Azure.Messaging.EventHubs and Azure.Messaging.ServiceBus.
Or ensure both new and older packages are covered.
If we are covering both, then do emphasize that we recommend the use of the newer ones
@spelluru who is the content developer for these services should be able to help here
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,newer sdks for event hubs and service bus should be used in retry guidance this page on retry guidance has sections for event hubs and service bus where the latest sdk is not listed either replace the current content with that for the newer packages azure messaging eventhubs and azure messaging servicebus or ensure both new and older packages are covered if we are covering both then do emphasize that we recommend the use of the newer ones spelluru who is the content developer for these services should be able to help here document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11288,29810891288.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-16 14:58:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"AWS Control Tower is analogous to Azure Blueprints, or Azure Lighthouse? (templating phase -vs- orchestration phase)",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri1,"
The page mentions Azure Blueprints as being the analogous asset to AWS Control Tower, but seems like that misses the aspect of orchestration across multiple environments - which seems more like it aligns to Azure lighthouse.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1.0,"AWS Control Tower is analogous to Azure Blueprints, or Azure Lighthouse? (templating phase -vs- orchestration phase) -
The page mentions Azure Blueprints as being the analogous asset to AWS Control Tower, but seems like that misses the aspect of orchestration across multiple environments - which seems more like it aligns to Azure lighthouse.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1,aws control tower is analogous to azure blueprints or azure lighthouse templating phase vs orchestration phase the page mentions azure blueprints as being the analogous asset to aws control tower but seems like that misses the aspect of orchestration across multiple environments which seems more like it aligns to azure lighthouse document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login martinekuan microsoft alias yuanzhiqu ,1
5441,12498146149.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:45:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Retail inventory management,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-idea triaged,"Hi team,
I moved this from here: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center.zh-cn/issues/77
@richfox commented yesterday — with docs.microsoft.com
how to realize a small inventory control system with azure, do u have a code sample?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3d11b63e-15f8-5a33-5ab6-eeaf1f7db932
* Version Independent ID: 6c36fc2f-a896-53f1-34fa-934e6e216158
* Content: [Retail and e-commerce using Azure MySQL - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-ecommerce-using-azure-database-for-mysql#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-ecommerce-using-azure-database-for-mysql.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-ecommerce-using-azure-database-for-mysql.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Retail inventory management - Hi team,
I moved this from here: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center.zh-cn/issues/77
@richfox commented yesterday — with docs.microsoft.com
how to realize a small inventory control system with azure, do u have a code sample?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3d11b63e-15f8-5a33-5ab6-eeaf1f7db932
* Version Independent ID: 6c36fc2f-a896-53f1-34fa-934e6e216158
* Content: [Retail and e-commerce using Azure MySQL - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-ecommerce-using-azure-database-for-mysql#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-ecommerce-using-azure-database-for-mysql.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/retail-and-ecommerce-using-azure-database-for-mysql.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,retail inventory management hi team i moved this from here richfox commented yesterday — with docs microsoft com how to realize a small inventory control system with azure do u have a code sample document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
7740,19042429222.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-25 00:35:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Clarify if IoT Hub supports X509 auth over WebSockets,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"I read in this article:
> Web socket variants of AMQP and MQTT aren't supported with X.509 CA certificates in IoT Hub.
I've not been able to find this limitation in the product docs:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-mqtt-support
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-amqp-support
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c75be638-b3f3-b73d-fb10-34c91bb0edcd
* Version Independent ID: e4225e21-3462-b35c-21b5-df43fd253b5d
* Content: [Attestation, authentication, provisioning - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot/attestation-provisioning)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/iot/attestation-provisioning.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/iot/attestation-provisioning.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @wamachine
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Clarify if IoT Hub supports X509 auth over WebSockets - I read in this article:
> Web socket variants of AMQP and MQTT aren't supported with X.509 CA certificates in IoT Hub.
I've not been able to find this limitation in the product docs:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-mqtt-support
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-amqp-support
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c75be638-b3f3-b73d-fb10-34c91bb0edcd
* Version Independent ID: e4225e21-3462-b35c-21b5-df43fd253b5d
* Content: [Attestation, authentication, provisioning - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot/attestation-provisioning)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/iot/attestation-provisioning.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/iot/attestation-provisioning.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @wamachine
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,clarify if iot hub supports auth over websockets i read in this article web socket variants of amqp and mqtt aren t supported with x ca certificates in iot hub i ve not been able to find this limitation in the product docs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login wamachine microsoft alias pnp ,1
7873,19725503008.0,IssuesEvent,2022-01-13 19:32:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Why not to use grpc for inter-pod communication,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Could you please comment, why grpc is not used for inter-pod communication?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#network-topology)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Why not to use grpc for inter-pod communication -
Could you please comment, why grpc is not used for inter-pod communication?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks#network-topology)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/secure-baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,why not to use grpc for inter pod communication could you please comment why grpc is not used for inter pod communication document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
5442,12498157977.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:47:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Lack of infomration to deploy this solution,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"There is no 'Deploy' button. Really finding it difficult to navigate to the actual solution from this webpage.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa0449a1-4347-bf58-425b-ac873e6f0937
* Version Independent ID: e07346e2-502e-545b-e060-e3c0ba9259cc
* Content: [Demand Forecasting - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Lack of infomration to deploy this solution - There is no 'Deploy' button. Really finding it difficult to navigate to the actual solution from this webpage.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: aa0449a1-4347-bf58-425b-ac873e6f0937
* Version Independent ID: e07346e2-502e-545b-e060-e3c0ba9259cc
* Content: [Demand Forecasting - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/demand-forecasting.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,lack of infomration to deploy this solution there is no deploy button really finding it difficult to navigate to the actual solution from this webpage document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5927,13303386380.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-25 15:26:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Key Vault icon missing,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug triaged,"The icon for Key Vault appears to be missing from V1.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Key Vault icon missing - The icon for Key Vault appears to be missing from V1.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,key vault icon missing the icon for key vault appears to be missing from document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9712,25103608348.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:11:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Isn't AZTK deprecated?,doc-enhancement triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
When I contacted an engineer who was familiar with AZTK they recommended it not be used. Should it be listed here?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bba35cbb-4160-0b5d-6829-103b25ad6ce9
* Version Independent ID: fa12ea8e-401a-9567-7b35-ffff532a99b6
* Content: [Choosing a batch processing technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Isn't AZTK deprecated? -
When I contacted an engineer who was familiar with AZTK they recommended it not be used. Should it be listed here?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bba35cbb-4160-0b5d-6829-103b25ad6ce9
* Version Independent ID: fa12ea8e-401a-9567-7b35-ffff532a99b6
* Content: [Choosing a batch processing technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/batch-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,isn t aztk deprecated when i contacted an engineer who was familiar with aztk they recommended it not be used should it be listed here document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
5434,12497929069.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:21:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Something is missing,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc doc-idea triaged,"Hello
I think something is missing here. You're introducing Cost Modeling and then jump straight into solutions to leverage such as Low Priority VMs and so on.
I think you should not be so exhaustive and move these solutions elsewhere.
I'm expecting from here to get guidelines to do cost modeling at a high level and not finding solutions answering to how to optimize so from my view point everything before the ""Estimating and Comparing costs"" should be moved after in a section like ""Rely on Azure features"" within this article or elsewhere in another one.
What's your thought ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ca4aca20-be78-ed61-145d-563fb3ff6d13
* Version Independent ID: c3f02005-d0e7-d756-04b5-655ecd84b1e8
* Content: [Modeling your cloud costs](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/modeling)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/modeling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/modeling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Something is missing - Hello
I think something is missing here. You're introducing Cost Modeling and then jump straight into solutions to leverage such as Low Priority VMs and so on.
I think you should not be so exhaustive and move these solutions elsewhere.
I'm expecting from here to get guidelines to do cost modeling at a high level and not finding solutions answering to how to optimize so from my view point everything before the ""Estimating and Comparing costs"" should be moved after in a section like ""Rely on Azure features"" within this article or elsewhere in another one.
What's your thought ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ca4aca20-be78-ed61-145d-563fb3ff6d13
* Version Independent ID: c3f02005-d0e7-d756-04b5-655ecd84b1e8
* Content: [Modeling your cloud costs](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/cost/modeling)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/cost/modeling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/cost/modeling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,something is missing hello i think something is missing here you re introducing cost modeling and then jump straight into solutions to leverage such as low priority vms and so on i think you should not be so exhaustive and move these solutions elsewhere i m expecting from here to get guidelines to do cost modeling at a high level and not finding solutions answering to how to optimize so from my view point everything before the estimating and comparing costs should be moved after in a section like rely on azure features within this article or elsewhere in another one what s your thought document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
9103,24040544331.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 00:59:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Private Endpoint and NSGs,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"(https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/networking/private-link-hub-spoke-network#networking)
On this section, the following is misleading:
> To restrict access from your hub or on-premises system to Private Endpoint, use a network security group in the subnet where you've deployed Private Endpoint. Configure appropriate inbound rules.
see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/private-link/disable-private-endpoint-network-policy?tabs=network-policy-portal
By default NSGs do NOT apply to subnets with private endpoints (it may still be a public preview feature? https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/updates/public-preview-of-private-link-network-security-group-support/ ).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9b5e1f6d-c45c-cb0f-f3d6-eedfdee9feff
* Version Independent ID: c55252c7-d117-024f-33ca-c1fd4e6c77ad
* Content: [Azure Private Link in a hub-and-spoke network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/networking/private-link-hub-spoke-network)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/networking/private-link-hub-spoke-network.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/networking/private-link-hub-spoke-network.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @jangelfdez
* Microsoft Alias: **josefern**",1.0,"Private Endpoint and NSGs - (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/networking/private-link-hub-spoke-network#networking)
On this section, the following is misleading:
> To restrict access from your hub or on-premises system to Private Endpoint, use a network security group in the subnet where you've deployed Private Endpoint. Configure appropriate inbound rules.
see https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/private-link/disable-private-endpoint-network-policy?tabs=network-policy-portal
By default NSGs do NOT apply to subnets with private endpoints (it may still be a public preview feature? https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/updates/public-preview-of-private-link-network-security-group-support/ ).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9b5e1f6d-c45c-cb0f-f3d6-eedfdee9feff
* Version Independent ID: c55252c7-d117-024f-33ca-c1fd4e6c77ad
* Content: [Azure Private Link in a hub-and-spoke network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/networking/private-link-hub-spoke-network)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/networking/private-link-hub-spoke-network.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/networking/private-link-hub-spoke-network.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @jangelfdez
* Microsoft Alias: **josefern**",1,private endpoint and nsgs on this section the following is misleading to restrict access from your hub or on premises system to private endpoint use a network security group in the subnet where you ve deployed private endpoint configure appropriate inbound rules see by default nsgs do not apply to subnets with private endpoints it may still be a public preview feature document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login jangelfdez microsoft alias josefern ,1
11285,29808996514.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-16 13:46:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Complexity and risk scale,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Hi Microsoft Team,
I would like to ask regarding scoring pattern. On what scale did you find the complexity and risk. How you you decide between 0 and 1 (a score of <0.3 = low, <0.7 = medium, >0.7 = high).
Thanks
Kind Regards,
Saud Khan
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 29f4fbe7-4716-95ba-3a3a-858dc9ca77b5
* Version Independent ID: eb1f3aac-11d1-e4fc-6925-0574b4438ee0
* Content: [Application assessment - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/serverless-quest/application-assessment)
* Content Source: [docs/serverless-quest/application-assessment.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/serverless-quest/application-assessment.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @rogeriohc
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Complexity and risk scale - Hi Microsoft Team,
I would like to ask regarding scoring pattern. On what scale did you find the complexity and risk. How you you decide between 0 and 1 (a score of <0.3 = low, <0.7 = medium, >0.7 = high).
Thanks
Kind Regards,
Saud Khan
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 29f4fbe7-4716-95ba-3a3a-858dc9ca77b5
* Version Independent ID: eb1f3aac-11d1-e4fc-6925-0574b4438ee0
* Content: [Application assessment - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/serverless-quest/application-assessment)
* Content Source: [docs/serverless-quest/application-assessment.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/serverless-quest/application-assessment.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @rogeriohc
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,complexity and risk scale hi microsoft team i would like to ask regarding scoring pattern on what scale did you find the complexity and risk how you you decide between and a score of high thanks kind regards saud khan document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login rogeriohc microsoft alias pnp ,1
8033,20627419078.0,IssuesEvent,2022-03-08 00:44:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The video on the page is Page Not Found (404),doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 well-architected/subsvc,"The video on this page is Page Not Found (404)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b79636ce-83ec-b5ba-fc6b-25c397516dd9
* Version Independent ID: 4f8cc5c2-4473-1ca8-b901-6329eb920e8c
* Content: [Performance efficiency pillar overview - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/scalability/overview)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/scalability/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/scalability/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-aangie
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"The video on the page is Page Not Found (404) - The video on this page is Page Not Found (404)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b79636ce-83ec-b5ba-fc6b-25c397516dd9
* Version Independent ID: 4f8cc5c2-4473-1ca8-b901-6329eb920e8c
* Content: [Performance efficiency pillar overview - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/scalability/overview)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/scalability/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/scalability/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @v-aangie
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,the video on the page is page not found the video on this page is page not found document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login v aangie microsoft alias pnp ,1
5439,12498089704.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:39:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Is it decentralized or distributed?,Pri3 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question triaged,"Hi,
Can you share the definition of ""decentralize""?
[I saw your post](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/decentralized-trust) and it looks we are mixing the definitions. Decentralize is not a two-way synonym of:
- consortium of organizations
- sharing data
- distributed ledger tech (DLT)
I agree with this statement:
> With DLTs (distributed ledger technology), a consortium of banks can establish a decentralized system that can be more efficient, less susceptible to attack, and serve as a new platform where innovative structures can be implemented to solve traditional challenges with privacy, speed, and cost.
But it's not decentralized. It's a DLT, it's a private blockchain and a private blockchain is by definition not decentralized.
I advise corpos on their infra and I'm tired of having the C-Level and VPs people mixing the decentralize concept with what is simply distributed.
Please change my mind.",1.0,"Is it decentralized or distributed? - Hi,
Can you share the definition of ""decentralize""?
[I saw your post](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/decentralized-trust) and it looks we are mixing the definitions. Decentralize is not a two-way synonym of:
- consortium of organizations
- sharing data
- distributed ledger tech (DLT)
I agree with this statement:
> With DLTs (distributed ledger technology), a consortium of banks can establish a decentralized system that can be more efficient, less susceptible to attack, and serve as a new platform where innovative structures can be implemented to solve traditional challenges with privacy, speed, and cost.
But it's not decentralized. It's a DLT, it's a private blockchain and a private blockchain is by definition not decentralized.
I advise corpos on their infra and I'm tired of having the C-Level and VPs people mixing the decentralize concept with what is simply distributed.
Please change my mind.",1,is it decentralized or distributed hi can you share the definition of decentralize and it looks we are mixing the definitions decentralize is not a two way synonym of consortium of organizations sharing data distributed ledger tech dlt i agree with this statement with dlts distributed ledger technology a consortium of banks can establish a decentralized system that can be more efficient less susceptible to attack and serve as a new platform where innovative structures can be implemented to solve traditional challenges with privacy speed and cost but it s not decentralized it s a dlt it s a private blockchain and a private blockchain is by definition not decentralized i advise corpos on their infra and i m tired of having the c level and vps people mixing the decentralize concept with what is simply distributed please change my mind ,1
6253,14008308164.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-28 23:21:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The German translation of the pattern name is nonsense. ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc triaged,"
""Muster für die Anspruchsprüfung"" is outrageously wrong.
The entire article's translation is so embarrassing that I don't even know where to start.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1970e0cd-53ae-02f6-479b-9ca386a5220e
* Version Independent ID: 8a81baa3-61c2-a8f6-540c-9a239583b8d6
* Content: [Claim-Check pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/claim-check)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/claim-check.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/claim-check.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @yorek
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"The German translation of the pattern name is nonsense. -
""Muster für die Anspruchsprüfung"" is outrageously wrong.
The entire article's translation is so embarrassing that I don't even know where to start.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1970e0cd-53ae-02f6-479b-9ca386a5220e
* Version Independent ID: 8a81baa3-61c2-a8f6-540c-9a239583b8d6
* Content: [Claim-Check pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/claim-check)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/claim-check.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/claim-check.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @yorek
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,the german translation of the pattern name is nonsense muster für die anspruchsprüfung is outrageously wrong the entire article s translation is so embarrassing that i don t even know where to start document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login yorek microsoft alias pnp ,1
11142,28125960131.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-31 17:44:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Feedback about event storms,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
There is no mention of event storms?
or too hitting this with too many times, such as in a loop can clog up the event store?
Or sending too many event based on receiving an event can clog up the event store?
or cause recursion-like behaviors when reacting and sending events?
Also, determining eventual consistency before using the data is eventual-consistency locking. Very similar to distributed locking.
I have seen this being used without considering pitfalls (not that it shouldn’t be used there - but how it is used needed changed).
but yes. Regardless. Great article!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Feedback about event storms -
[Enter feedback here]
There is no mention of event storms?
or too hitting this with too many times, such as in a loop can clog up the event store?
Or sending too many event based on receiving an event can clog up the event store?
or cause recursion-like behaviors when reacting and sending events?
Also, determining eventual consistency before using the data is eventual-consistency locking. Very similar to distributed locking.
I have seen this being used without considering pitfalls (not that it shouldn’t be used there - but how it is used needed changed).
but yes. Regardless. Great article!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,feedback about event storms there is no mention of event storms or too hitting this with too many times such as in a loop can clog up the event store or sending too many event based on receiving an event can clog up the event store or cause recursion like behaviors when reacting and sending events also determining eventual consistency before using the data is eventual consistency locking very similar to distributed locking i have seen this being used without considering pitfalls not that it shouldn’t be used there but how it is used needed changed but yes regardless great article document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
4986,11941803994.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 19:06:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Pricing estimates no longer work.,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author example-scenarios/subsvc triaged,"Neither of the pricing estimates work.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8866b26b-b0e7-494e-48cf-491db44b3aeb
* Version Independent ID: bd1d10ff-39db-a6cb-1a63-805e19159561
* Content: [Image classification for insurance claims - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenarios**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Pricing estimates no longer work. - Neither of the pricing estimates work.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8866b26b-b0e7-494e-48cf-491db44b3aeb
* Version Independent ID: bd1d10ff-39db-a6cb-1a63-805e19159561
* Content: [Image classification for insurance claims - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/ai/intelligent-apps-image-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenarios**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,pricing estimates no longer work neither of the pricing estimates work document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenarios github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
11664,32040487553.0,IssuesEvent,2023-09-22 18:52:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,What about Security Monitoring?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"There is no mention of security event monitoring. Please add some content about how Microsoft Sentinel should be used to monitor AKS.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 47583913-d1e3-7169-8a91-ac90281d4091
* Version Independent ID: 47583913-d1e3-7169-8a91-ac90281d4091
* Content: [Kubernetes monitoring and logging - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/eks-to-aks/monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/eks-to-aks/monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/eks-to-aks/monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ketan-chawda-msft
* Microsoft Alias: **kechaw**",1.0,"What about Security Monitoring? - There is no mention of security event monitoring. Please add some content about how Microsoft Sentinel should be used to monitor AKS.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 47583913-d1e3-7169-8a91-ac90281d4091
* Version Independent ID: 47583913-d1e3-7169-8a91-ac90281d4091
* Content: [Kubernetes monitoring and logging - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/eks-to-aks/monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/eks-to-aks/monitoring.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/eks-to-aks/monitoring.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ketan-chawda-msft
* Microsoft Alias: **kechaw**",1,what about security monitoring there is no mention of security event monitoring please add some content about how microsoft sentinel should be used to monitor aks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login ketan chawda msft microsoft alias kechaw ,1
3883,10239406829.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:10:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Standard Loadbalancer Architecture Not included,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
Azure Standard Loadbalancer Architecture Not included as an option even though it is the consensus best practice for current gen NVAs in Azure.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9bab6a90-43a3-3d83-d680-26683a3d833d
* Version Independent ID: f8eea094-d297-93e6-06ac-7652d059734f
* Content: [Deploy highly available network virtual appliances - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/nva-ha)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/dmz/nva-ha.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/dmz/nva-ha.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Azure Standard Loadbalancer Architecture Not included -
Azure Standard Loadbalancer Architecture Not included as an option even though it is the consensus best practice for current gen NVAs in Azure.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9bab6a90-43a3-3d83-d680-26683a3d833d
* Version Independent ID: f8eea094-d297-93e6-06ac-7652d059734f
* Content: [Deploy highly available network virtual appliances - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/nva-ha)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/dmz/nva-ha.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/dmz/nva-ha.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure standard loadbalancer architecture not included azure standard loadbalancer architecture not included as an option even though it is the consensus best practice for current gen nvas in azure document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
6063,13617003416.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-23 16:22:17,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Architecture Diagram and data flow steps in textual descriptions are not matching!,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
Architecture Diagram and data flow steps in textual descriptions are not matching!
example: The description explains two service buses outbox and inbox, but the diagram shows only one.
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9ed7b54c-fe6b-4331-f6d4-1e369ebad0c1
* Version Independent ID: 70f614a9-153c-3a7e-107c-526ba68adad6
* Content: [Supply Chain Track and Trace - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Architecture Diagram and data flow steps in textual descriptions are not matching! -
Architecture Diagram and data flow steps in textual descriptions are not matching!
example: The description explains two service buses outbox and inbox, but the diagram shows only one.
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9ed7b54c-fe6b-4331-f6d4-1e369ebad0c1
* Version Independent ID: 70f614a9-153c-3a7e-107c-526ba68adad6
* Content: [Supply Chain Track and Trace - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/supply-chain-track-and-trace.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,architecture diagram and data flow steps in textual descriptions are not matching architecture diagram and data flow steps in textual descriptions are not matching example the description explains two service buses outbox and inbox but the diagram shows only one document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5435,12497959020.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:24:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Is there a implementation of this architecture,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Is there a implementation of this architecture
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: faa600fa-247a-f5ed-d9c7-44af1cd7b132
* Version Independent ID: 194bdae7-041c-d4dd-3696-c05c9ff3b4dc
* Content: [Personalization using Cosmos DB - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/personalization-using-cosmos-db?source=docs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/personalization-using-cosmos-db.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/personalization-using-cosmos-db.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Is there a implementation of this architecture - Is there a implementation of this architecture
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: faa600fa-247a-f5ed-d9c7-44af1cd7b132
* Version Independent ID: 194bdae7-041c-d4dd-3696-c05c9ff3b4dc
* Content: [Personalization using Cosmos DB - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/personalization-using-cosmos-db?source=docs#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/personalization-using-cosmos-db.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/personalization-using-cosmos-db.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,is there a implementation of this architecture is there a implementation of this architecture document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5666,12960452290.0,IssuesEvent,2020-07-20 14:23:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Example,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"needs some code examples. A step by step document would be great to show a sample ecommerce app
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ae02d869-5b00-9a9c-e7f4-2dea56bbd360
* Version Independent ID: 1326c190-21b4-de15-a37f-89eea0023399
* Content: [Architect scalable e-commerce web app - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-ecommerce-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-ecommerce-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-ecommerce-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Example - needs some code examples. A step by step document would be great to show a sample ecommerce app
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ae02d869-5b00-9a9c-e7f4-2dea56bbd360
* Version Independent ID: 1326c190-21b4-de15-a37f-89eea0023399
* Content: [Architect scalable e-commerce web app - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-ecommerce-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-ecommerce-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-ecommerce-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,example needs some code examples a step by step document would be great to show a sample ecommerce app document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
3812,10172902138.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-08 11:53:25,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Storage Container Name invalid characterset mentioned,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-bug triaged,"As per the doc the valid characterset for Storage Container name is [0-9, a-z, A-Z and -] but the casing allowed is lowercase. Even when we create container only lowercase is allowed therefore valid characters should be [0-9, a-z and -]. Can you please check if it is required to be corrected. Thanks.
Link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#storage
Entity | Scope | Length | Casing | Valid Characters | Suggested Pattern | Example
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
Container name | Storage account | 3-63 | Lowercase | 0-9, a-z, A-Z and - | | logs
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Storage Container Name invalid characterset mentioned - As per the doc the valid characterset for Storage Container name is [0-9, a-z, A-Z and -] but the casing allowed is lowercase. Even when we create container only lowercase is allowed therefore valid characters should be [0-9, a-z and -]. Can you please check if it is required to be corrected. Thanks.
Link: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#storage
Entity | Scope | Length | Casing | Valid Characters | Suggested Pattern | Example
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | --
Container name | Storage account | 3-63 | Lowercase | 0-9, a-z, A-Z and - | | logs
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,storage container name invalid characterset mentioned as per the doc the valid characterset for storage container name is but the casing allowed is lowercase even when we create container only lowercase is allowed therefore valid characters should be can you please check if it is required to be corrected thanks link entity scope length casing valid characters suggested pattern example container name storage account lowercase a z a z and logs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
5448,12498342860.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 18:06:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SVG Request,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Can we get an svg of this architecture please. Tks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 524d1f97-ce37-f9ac-cf05-d33665eb34df
* Version Independent ID: fe4cc63f-a4b1-c30e-f39f-f4c3de1c57be
* Content: [Serverless web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"SVG Request - Can we get an svg of this architecture please. Tks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 524d1f97-ce37-f9ac-cf05-d33665eb34df
* Version Independent ID: fe4cc63f-a4b1-c30e-f39f-f4c3de1c57be
* Content: [Serverless web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/serverless/web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,svg request can we get an svg of this architecture please tks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
3853,10223504860.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-16 09:52:04,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Highlight that Helm in ACR is not GA yet.,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Please, highlight that as of today - storing Helm Charts in Azure Container registry is still in preview.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/container-registry/container-registry-helm-repos
I would be very careful with preview features, because essentially - we can use it on our own risk and will not receive support from Microsoft if something goes wrong
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 57f4d213-3eb1-5b4c-aa67-116e8fa36f7d
* Version Independent ID: 18199b5a-8f57-6574-c795-7540199ae49a
* Content: [Building a CI/CD pipeline for microservices on Kubernetes](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Highlight that Helm in ACR is not GA yet. - Please, highlight that as of today - storing Helm Charts in Azure Container registry is still in preview.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/container-registry/container-registry-helm-repos
I would be very careful with preview features, because essentially - we can use it on our own risk and will not receive support from Microsoft if something goes wrong
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 57f4d213-3eb1-5b4c-aa67-116e8fa36f7d
* Version Independent ID: 18199b5a-8f57-6574-c795-7540199ae49a
* Content: [Building a CI/CD pipeline for microservices on Kubernetes](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/ci-cd-kubernetes.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,highlight that helm in acr is not ga yet please highlight that as of today storing helm charts in azure container registry is still in preview i would be very careful with preview features because essentially we can use it on our own risk and will not receive support from microsoft if something goes wrong document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
7699,18894839970.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-15 16:44:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Slash before operations?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc well-architected/subsvc,"I'm not familiar with any mathematical nomenclature that uses a slash before an operand.
Can we remove the leading slash or explain its meaning?
I would expect this ""((1 − N) \^ R)"" to be ""((1 − N) ^ R)""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f5f7448a-64b8-4a45-607a-1a81792a4d96
* Version Independent ID: acfa6055-a2ac-2642-a7c7-a9da10473549
* Content: [Business Metrics - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/business-metrics#composite-slas)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/business-metrics.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/business-metrics.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Slash before operations? - I'm not familiar with any mathematical nomenclature that uses a slash before an operand.
Can we remove the leading slash or explain its meaning?
I would expect this ""((1 − N) \^ R)"" to be ""((1 − N) ^ R)""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f5f7448a-64b8-4a45-607a-1a81792a4d96
* Version Independent ID: acfa6055-a2ac-2642-a7c7-a9da10473549
* Content: [Business Metrics - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/resiliency/business-metrics#composite-slas)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/business-metrics.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/business-metrics.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,slash before operations i m not familiar with any mathematical nomenclature that uses a slash before an operand can we remove the leading slash or explain its meaning i would expect this − n r to be − n r document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
10256,26614693509.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-24 05:27:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken link to Visio Stencils,doc-bug cxp awaiting-product-team-response triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"The link to https://aka.ms/AzureDiagrams does not appear to be working giving a 502 error when clicked
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @Zimmergren
* Microsoft Alias: **tozimmergren**",1.0,"Broken link to Visio Stencils - The link to https://aka.ms/AzureDiagrams does not appear to be working giving a 502 error when clicked
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @Zimmergren
* Microsoft Alias: **tozimmergren**",1,broken link to visio stencils the link to does not appear to be working giving a error when clicked document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login zimmergren microsoft alias tozimmergren ,1
10626,27168232496.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-17 17:00:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Update Azure Storage Guidance with v12 library,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 best-practice/subsvc,"I believe the the Azure Storage guidance is based on the v11 library. Please update the guidance for the v12 library which uses the [RetryOptions](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/azure.core.retryoptions?view=azure-dotnet) class.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#azure-storage)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Update Azure Storage Guidance with v12 library - I believe the the Azure Storage guidance is based on the v11 library. Please update the guidance for the v12 library which uses the [RetryOptions](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/azure.core.retryoptions?view=azure-dotnet) class.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8194899c-dee2-70ac-422a-edc06e779f7c
* Version Independent ID: cafc7418-404c-5908-3037-dba7f452087b
* Content: [Retry guidance for Azure services - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/retry-service-specific#azure-storage)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/retry-service-specific.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,update azure storage guidance with library i believe the the azure storage guidance is based on the library please update the guidance for the library which uses the class document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10338,26800319962.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-01 14:43:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Request to add more content ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"Hi Team,
Please add potential use cases, alternative services, implementation considerations, or pricing guidance.
Thanks!!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 14acf440-88ed-186c-a3ab-5309bf7e363c
* Version Independent ID: d32e5eb7-5011-dc40-e978-c6bc9f6363a5
* Content: [DevTest and DevOps for microservice solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-microservice)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-microservice.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-microservice.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Request to add more content - Hi Team,
Please add potential use cases, alternative services, implementation considerations, or pricing guidance.
Thanks!!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 14acf440-88ed-186c-a3ab-5309bf7e363c
* Version Independent ID: d32e5eb7-5011-dc40-e978-c6bc9f6363a5
* Content: [DevTest and DevOps for microservice solutions - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-microservice)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-microservice.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/dev-test-microservice.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,request to add more content hi team please add potential use cases alternative services implementation considerations or pricing guidance thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11292,29811944900.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-16 15:43:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Please check the link under ""Certificates""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"Hello,
kindly check the link under ""**Certificates**"" on this page:
For information about other CAs that Front Door supports, see [Allowed certificate authorities for enabling custom HTTPS on Azure Front Door](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/front-door-faq#does-front-door-support-self-signed-certificates-on-the-backend-for-https-connection-).
Should the link be to this page? https://ccadb.my.salesforce-sites.com/microsoft/IncludedCACertificateReportForMSFT
The currently linked page does not contain information about other CAs that Front Door supports.
Kind regards,
Anne
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: af2806b1-1264-2775-4cce-083303e75b49
* Version Independent ID: 68218fb5-2335-183a-8469-9101a2d8a0ef
* Content: [AKS baseline for multiregion clusters - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-multi-region/aks-multi-cluster)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-multi-region/aks-multi-cluster.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-multi-region/aks-multi-cluster.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",2.0,"Please check the link under ""Certificates"" - Hello,
kindly check the link under ""**Certificates**"" on this page:
For information about other CAs that Front Door supports, see [Allowed certificate authorities for enabling custom HTTPS on Azure Front Door](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/front-door-faq#does-front-door-support-self-signed-certificates-on-the-backend-for-https-connection-).
Should the link be to this page? https://ccadb.my.salesforce-sites.com/microsoft/IncludedCACertificateReportForMSFT
The currently linked page does not contain information about other CAs that Front Door supports.
Kind regards,
Anne
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: af2806b1-1264-2775-4cce-083303e75b49
* Version Independent ID: 68218fb5-2335-183a-8469-9101a2d8a0ef
* Content: [AKS baseline for multiregion clusters - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-multi-region/aks-multi-cluster)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-multi-region/aks-multi-cluster.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-multi-region/aks-multi-cluster.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @martinekuan
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,please check the link under certificates hello kindly check the link under certificates on this page for information about other cas that front door supports see should the link be to this page the currently linked page does not contain information about other cas that front door supports kind regards anne document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login martinekuan microsoft alias architectures ,1
9016,23979299541.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-13 13:58:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Alternatives section is confusing,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
Customers have asked about the following listed under alternatives,
_""However, in regulated industries in particular, some organizations can't use Azure Synapse for various reasons.""_
but there is no link or explanation of which industries cannot use Synapse, not great for a customer to read when we cannot explain it and they are also talking to Snowflake.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d394d06c-9042-e12c-ad19-dd9f456e511d
* Version Independent ID: d394d06c-9042-e12c-ad19-dd9f456e511d
* Content: [Data analysis for regulated industries - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/data/data-analysis-regulated-industries)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/data/data-analysis-regulated-industries.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/data/data-analysis-regulated-industries.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jbinko
* Microsoft Alias: **jbinko**",1.0,"Alternatives section is confusing -
Customers have asked about the following listed under alternatives,
_""However, in regulated industries in particular, some organizations can't use Azure Synapse for various reasons.""_
but there is no link or explanation of which industries cannot use Synapse, not great for a customer to read when we cannot explain it and they are also talking to Snowflake.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d394d06c-9042-e12c-ad19-dd9f456e511d
* Version Independent ID: d394d06c-9042-e12c-ad19-dd9f456e511d
* Content: [Data analysis for regulated industries - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/data/data-analysis-regulated-industries)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/data/data-analysis-regulated-industries.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/data/data-analysis-regulated-industries.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jbinko
* Microsoft Alias: **jbinko**",1,alternatives section is confusing customers have asked about the following listed under alternatives however in regulated industries in particular some organizations can t use azure synapse for various reasons but there is no link or explanation of which industries cannot use synapse not great for a customer to read when we cannot explain it and they are also talking to snowflake document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login jbinko microsoft alias jbinko ,1
11013,27749861608.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-15 19:49:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The method mentioned in this template no longer works,assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
ARM template sections mentioned in this no longer works, it's failing with the below errors.
`{""code"":""DeploymentFailed"",""message"":""At least one resource deployment operation failed. Please list deployment operations for details. Please see https://aka.ms/DeployOperations for usage details."",""details"":[{""code"":""InvalidJson"",""message"":""Could not find member 'description' on object of type 'SecurityRule'. Path 'properties.securityRules[0].description', line 1, position 70.""}]}`
[Github link](https://github.com/mspnp/template-examples) provided as reference in the document is updated with another set of [ARM templates](https://github.com/mspnp/template-examples/blob/master/example3-object-param/deploy.json).
Is this feature of `ARM copy values from object data types` is broken ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 928f1651-0e7e-9389-add5-120cf6ccf0dd
* Version Independent ID: 5399b529-92c2-ac3c-0f66-7cbcfef25c91
* Content: [Use objects as parameters in ARM template - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/azure-resource-manager/advanced-templates/objects-as-parameters)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/azure-resource-manager/advanced-templates/objects-as-parameters.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/azure-resource-manager/advanced-templates/objects-as-parameters.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"The method mentioned in this template no longer works -
[Enter feedback here]
ARM template sections mentioned in this no longer works, it's failing with the below errors.
`{""code"":""DeploymentFailed"",""message"":""At least one resource deployment operation failed. Please list deployment operations for details. Please see https://aka.ms/DeployOperations for usage details."",""details"":[{""code"":""InvalidJson"",""message"":""Could not find member 'description' on object of type 'SecurityRule'. Path 'properties.securityRules[0].description', line 1, position 70.""}]}`
[Github link](https://github.com/mspnp/template-examples) provided as reference in the document is updated with another set of [ARM templates](https://github.com/mspnp/template-examples/blob/master/example3-object-param/deploy.json).
Is this feature of `ARM copy values from object data types` is broken ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 928f1651-0e7e-9389-add5-120cf6ccf0dd
* Version Independent ID: 5399b529-92c2-ac3c-0f66-7cbcfef25c91
* Content: [Use objects as parameters in ARM template - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/azure-resource-manager/advanced-templates/objects-as-parameters)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/azure-resource-manager/advanced-templates/objects-as-parameters.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/azure-resource-manager/advanced-templates/objects-as-parameters.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,the method mentioned in this template no longer works arm template sections mentioned in this no longer works it s failing with the below errors code deploymentfailed message at least one resource deployment operation failed please list deployment operations for details please see for usage details details description line position provided as reference in the document is updated with another set of is this feature of arm copy values from object data types is broken document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6048,13543849693.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-16 19:38:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mistake in AzureBastionSubnet IP address,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug needs-art reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
The IP address in AzureBastionSubnet is not correct (10.0.0.254.0/27). Should be 10.0.254.0/27
[dmz-reference-architectures.zip](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/files/5034747/dmz-reference-architectures.zip)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 74bb4b25-ebe2-264d-047d-3f651c52a9c5
* Version Independent ID: aed6ebef-6157-9608-3f85-0807c7fdf61d
* Content: [Implement a secure hybrid network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz?toc=%2Fazure%2Fvirtual-network%2Ftoc.json)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Mistake in AzureBastionSubnet IP address -
The IP address in AzureBastionSubnet is not correct (10.0.0.254.0/27). Should be 10.0.254.0/27
[dmz-reference-architectures.zip](https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center/files/5034747/dmz-reference-architectures.zip)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 74bb4b25-ebe2-264d-047d-3f651c52a9c5
* Version Independent ID: aed6ebef-6157-9608-3f85-0807c7fdf61d
* Content: [Implement a secure hybrid network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz?toc=%2Fazure%2Fvirtual-network%2Ftoc.json)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/dmz/secure-vnet-dmz.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,mistake in azurebastionsubnet ip address the ip address in azurebastionsubnet is not correct should be document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10146,26397927389.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-12 21:20:09,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mismatched image / reference arch download on page,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Image on the page of the Reference Arch and Visio file download do not match.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Mismatched image / reference arch download on page - Image on the page of the Reference Arch and Visio file download do not match.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,mismatched image reference arch download on page image on the page of the reference arch and visio file download do not match document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
6246,14003982483.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-28 16:31:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Link to Azure ML Experimentation Service seems to be pointing to wrong destination,Pri2 architecture-center/svc solution-idea/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
The link for ""Learn more about Azure Machine Learning Experimentation Service"" is pointing to an article about virtual network isolation and privacy.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 947848c1-c1a3-4241-4ce0-e8743d539d17
* Version Independent ID: f0c88a85-6601-0361-9bd0-d80092582d0b
* Content: [Information discovery with deep learning and NLP - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/information-discovery-with-deep-learning-and-nlp)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/information-discovery-with-deep-learning-and-nlp.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/information-discovery-with-deep-learning-and-nlp.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Link to Azure ML Experimentation Service seems to be pointing to wrong destination -
[Enter feedback here]
The link for ""Learn more about Azure Machine Learning Experimentation Service"" is pointing to an article about virtual network isolation and privacy.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 947848c1-c1a3-4241-4ce0-e8743d539d17
* Version Independent ID: f0c88a85-6601-0361-9bd0-d80092582d0b
* Content: [Information discovery with deep learning and NLP - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/information-discovery-with-deep-learning-and-nlp)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/information-discovery-with-deep-learning-and-nlp.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/information-discovery-with-deep-learning-and-nlp.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,link to azure ml experimentation service seems to be pointing to wrong destination the link for learn more about azure machine learning experimentation service is pointing to an article about virtual network isolation and privacy document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9002,23961551972.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-12 19:36:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Out of date reference to SQL DB for R programmer,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"R is no longer supported in Azure SQL DB. R is now supported in Azure SQL MI.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2808e74b-c325-7b50-093a-b777473864b5
* Version Independent ID: e1f632cb-92ef-958e-5bf4-d250108e1c8d
* Content: [R developer's guide to Azure - R programming - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/r-developers-guide)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/r-developers-guide.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/r-developers-guide.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @AnalyticJeremy
* Microsoft Alias: **jepeach**",1.0,"Out of date reference to SQL DB for R programmer - R is no longer supported in Azure SQL DB. R is now supported in Azure SQL MI.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2808e74b-c325-7b50-093a-b777473864b5
* Version Independent ID: e1f632cb-92ef-958e-5bf4-d250108e1c8d
* Content: [R developer's guide to Azure - R programming - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/r-developers-guide)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/r-developers-guide.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/r-developers-guide.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @AnalyticJeremy
* Microsoft Alias: **jepeach**",1,out of date reference to sql db for r programmer r is no longer supported in azure sql db r is now supported in azure sql mi document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login analyticjeremy microsoft alias jepeach ,1
9056,24001033515.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-14 11:28:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,subnet for VPN gateway,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"New recommendation for GatewaySubnet is address range of /26 instead /27.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",2.0,"subnet for VPN gateway - New recommendation for GatewaySubnet is address range of /26 instead /27.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,subnet for vpn gateway new recommendation for gatewaysubnet is address range of instead document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
5367,12400225208.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-21 07:22:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Wrong info about NoSQL,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"You say about NoSQL:
""(The term isn't quite accurate, because many non-relational data stores support SQL compatible queries.)""
I thought it stood for ""Not Only SQL"", in which case it is completely accurate!
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4bf39ec6-5a99-ca3d-8913-9021898dcfbb
* Version Independent ID: 7aa2e806-302b-23b3-7002-1dfed4b7dd28
* Content: [Azure Data Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/data-guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Wrong info about NoSQL - You say about NoSQL:
""(The term isn't quite accurate, because many non-relational data stores support SQL compatible queries.)""
I thought it stood for ""Not Only SQL"", in which case it is completely accurate!
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4bf39ec6-5a99-ca3d-8913-9021898dcfbb
* Version Independent ID: 7aa2e806-302b-23b3-7002-1dfed4b7dd28
* Content: [Azure Data Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/data-guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,wrong info about nosql you say about nosql the term isn t quite accurate because many non relational data stores support sql compatible queries i thought it stood for not only sql in which case it is completely accurate document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10465,26992863439.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-09 21:29:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Analytical Data Store Security Table Updated?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"The comparison table under security says ADX doesn't support RLS. Maybe time to update with a caveat/footnote?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-explorer/kusto/management/rowlevelsecuritypolicy?msclkid=86ebd3ffcf9811ecafb4589114cd3501
I didn't review the other tables on the page or entries in the security--just noticed that one.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e643be6d-22a2-2b91-c370-edf83d694efe
* Version Independent ID: 770f2e51-9c53-e5ca-1107-9577369b15a6
* Content: [Choose an analytical data store - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Analytical Data Store Security Table Updated? - The comparison table under security says ADX doesn't support RLS. Maybe time to update with a caveat/footnote?
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-explorer/kusto/management/rowlevelsecuritypolicy?msclkid=86ebd3ffcf9811ecafb4589114cd3501
I didn't review the other tables on the page or entries in the security--just noticed that one.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e643be6d-22a2-2b91-c370-edf83d694efe
* Version Independent ID: 770f2e51-9c53-e5ca-1107-9577369b15a6
* Content: [Choose an analytical data store - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/analytical-data-stores.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,analytical data store security table updated the comparison table under security says adx doesn t support rls maybe time to update with a caveat footnote i didn t review the other tables on the page or entries in the security just noticed that one document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11493,30747817754.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-28 16:24:59,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Conditional Forwarders,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
Hi,
Why does the document specify the on-premises Conditional Forwarder zone is database.windows.net when using a DNS forwarder VM and the Conditional Forwarders zone is privatelink.database.windows.net when using the Azure DNS Private DNS resolver?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Version Independent ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Content: [Azure DNS Private Resolver - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @moorthyannadurai
* Microsoft Alias: **moannadu**",1.0,"Conditional Forwarders -
Hi,
Why does the document specify the on-premises Conditional Forwarder zone is database.windows.net when using a DNS forwarder VM and the Conditional Forwarders zone is privatelink.database.windows.net when using the Azure DNS Private DNS resolver?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Version Independent ID: 6ce03940-eeb4-98b6-4624-1615715beec4
* Content: [Azure DNS Private Resolver - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/networking/azure-dns-private-resolver.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @moorthyannadurai
* Microsoft Alias: **moannadu**",1,conditional forwarders hi why does the document specify the on premises conditional forwarder zone is database windows net when using a dns forwarder vm and the conditional forwarders zone is privatelink database windows net when using the azure dns private dns resolver document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login moorthyannadurai microsoft alias moannadu ,1
9707,25080402154.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-07 18:47:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Update benefits paragraph,assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
The benefits (paragraph 2) are not really explained well.
It's not obvious how a hub and spoke configuration can help save costs.
Subscription limits relate to subscriptions, not the network architecture, although having a segregated network architecture can enable segregation of vNets across multiple subscriptions, and thus help to avoid subscription limits.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Update benefits paragraph -
[Enter feedback here]
The benefits (paragraph 2) are not really explained well.
It's not obvious how a hub and spoke configuration can help save costs.
Subscription limits relate to subscriptions, not the network architecture, although having a segregated network architecture can enable segregation of vNets across multiple subscriptions, and thus help to avoid subscription limits.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,update benefits paragraph the benefits paragraph are not really explained well it s not obvious how a hub and spoke configuration can help save costs subscription limits relate to subscriptions not the network architecture although having a segregated network architecture can enable segregation of vnets across multiple subscriptions and thus help to avoid subscription limits document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
6685,15038679276.0,IssuesEvent,2021-02-02 17:43:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Wrong Azure Powershell command RM instead of Az,architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Hello Microsoft team,
Please update the command on this page, the command Get-AzureRmExpressRouteServiceProvider is not in use anymore, it is a legacy Azure RM, the correct should be Get-AzExpressRouteServiceProvider from Azure Az PowerShell module.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/az.network/get-azexpressrouteserviceprovider?view=azps-5.4.0
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/azure/new-azureps-module-az?view=azps-5.4.0#migrate-existing-scripts-from-azurerm-to-az
The page that should be updated:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute#connectivity-providers
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 61c1b093-200e-8d59-0e6e-98f510dca5f6
* Version Independent ID: db6fcf0f-1a88-b216-4c08-a83c4128b4fa
* Content: [Extend an on-premises network using ExpressRoute - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Wrong Azure Powershell command RM instead of Az - Hello Microsoft team,
Please update the command on this page, the command Get-AzureRmExpressRouteServiceProvider is not in use anymore, it is a legacy Azure RM, the correct should be Get-AzExpressRouteServiceProvider from Azure Az PowerShell module.
References:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/az.network/get-azexpressrouteserviceprovider?view=azps-5.4.0
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/azure/new-azureps-module-az?view=azps-5.4.0#migrate-existing-scripts-from-azurerm-to-az
The page that should be updated:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute#connectivity-providers
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 61c1b093-200e-8d59-0e6e-98f510dca5f6
* Version Independent ID: db6fcf0f-1a88-b216-4c08-a83c4128b4fa
* Content: [Extend an on-premises network using ExpressRoute - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,wrong azure powershell command rm instead of az hello microsoft team please update the command on this page the command get azurermexpressrouteserviceprovider is not in use anymore it is a legacy azure rm the correct should be get azexpressrouteserviceprovider from azure az powershell module references the page that should be updated document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6635,14973013555.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-28 00:05:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure symbols are useless,Pri2 Product-bug architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author triaged,"The new symbols are useless for two reasons
1) SVG format is not opened by Visio (desktop & online) nor Microsoft whiteboard app.
2) The new version is very tiny that are even after converting them to png are useless to use
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure symbols are useless - The new symbols are useless for two reasons
1) SVG format is not opened by Visio (desktop & online) nor Microsoft whiteboard app.
2) The new version is very tiny that are even after converting them to png are useless to use
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure symbols are useless the new symbols are useless for two reasons svg format is not opened by visio desktop online nor microsoft whiteboard app the new version is very tiny that are even after converting them to png are useless to use document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10364,26838457841.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-02 21:40:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Association table between ResourceType and icon,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"Hello,
It's a great set of icons. Is there the possibility to add a CSV file with the association between ResourceType and icon? For example:
`
Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines;icon-xxx.svg
`
I am trying to make a custom data representation exported from Azure and I would love to automatic connect resources with the corresponding icons.
Thank you 🎈
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Association table between ResourceType and icon - Hello,
It's a great set of icons. Is there the possibility to add a CSV file with the association between ResourceType and icon? For example:
`
Microsoft.Compute/virtualMachines;icon-xxx.svg
`
I am trying to make a custom data representation exported from Azure and I would love to automatic connect resources with the corresponding icons.
Thank you 🎈
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,association table between resourcetype and icon hello it s a great set of icons is there the possibility to add a csv file with the association between resourcetype and icon for example microsoft compute virtualmachines icon xxx svg i am trying to make a custom data representation exported from azure and i would love to automatic connect resources with the corresponding icons thank you 🎈 document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9653,24976124280.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-02 07:58:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Unable to download deployment content,assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2 Product-bug,"
[Enter feedback here]
Getting the following error while trying to deploy the template from - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MicrosoftLearning/AZ-301-MicrosoftAzureArchitectDesign/master/allfiles/AZ-301T03/Module_02/LabFiles/Starter/azuredeploy.json
```
Unable to download deployment content from 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iainfoulds/architecture-center/aks-devops/docs/sample-solutions/app-modernization/templates/devops-with-aks/nested/grafana.json'. The tracking Id is '56deb704-7f00-4181-9181-f2de40167818'.
```
Looks like the something is wrong with the URL concatenation. Haven't managed to find out the right path to the grafana.json yet.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5978df0f-98f5-f365-1912-48fc8c27566e
* Version Independent ID: 4f2b4216-1cc7-a267-eee4-d7716ce5ed03
* Content: [CI/CD pipeline for container-based workloads - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/devops-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/devops-with-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/devops-with-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @iainfoulds
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Unable to download deployment content -
[Enter feedback here]
Getting the following error while trying to deploy the template from - https://raw.githubusercontent.com/MicrosoftLearning/AZ-301-MicrosoftAzureArchitectDesign/master/allfiles/AZ-301T03/Module_02/LabFiles/Starter/azuredeploy.json
```
Unable to download deployment content from 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iainfoulds/architecture-center/aks-devops/docs/sample-solutions/app-modernization/templates/devops-with-aks/nested/grafana.json'. The tracking Id is '56deb704-7f00-4181-9181-f2de40167818'.
```
Looks like the something is wrong with the URL concatenation. Haven't managed to find out the right path to the grafana.json yet.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5978df0f-98f5-f365-1912-48fc8c27566e
* Version Independent ID: 4f2b4216-1cc7-a267-eee4-d7716ce5ed03
* Content: [CI/CD pipeline for container-based workloads - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/devops-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/devops-with-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/devops-with-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @iainfoulds
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,unable to download deployment content getting the following error while trying to deploy the template from unable to download deployment content from the tracking id is looks like the something is wrong with the url concatenation haven t managed to find out the right path to the grafana json yet document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login iainfoulds microsoft alias pnp ,1
10041,26125446545.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-28 17:50:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Categorize items-improve presentation and organization,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2,"The very long list of what's new items is difficult to use because it is random by month. Please add some type of categorization or grouping each month so that we can more easily find information about changes to specific services/topics/applications.
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @alexhart11
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Categorize items-improve presentation and organization - The very long list of what's new items is difficult to use because it is random by month. Please add some type of categorization or grouping each month so that we can more easily find information about changes to specific services/topics/applications.
Thanks
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @alexhart11
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,categorize items improve presentation and organization the very long list of what s new items is difficult to use because it is random by month please add some type of categorization or grouping each month so that we can more easily find information about changes to specific services topics applications thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5446,12498223827.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 17:54:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Please provide implementation details and code examples,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 839bcfd0-caf7-c1f2-0dab-3340d9f8f528
* Version Independent ID: 8631e812-4b30-9c93-a007-203bc05a238e
* Content: [Social App for Mobile and Web with Authentication - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Please provide implementation details and code examples -
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 839bcfd0-caf7-c1f2-0dab-3340d9f8f528
* Version Independent ID: 8631e812-4b30-9c93-a007-203bc05a238e
* Content: [Social App for Mobile and Web with Authentication - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please provide implementation details and code examples document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
4816,11732776504.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-11 04:56:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,can you train on AKS in Azure ML?? ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp product-question solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Can you train on AKS in Azure ML?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c04a7e7b-ebe4-b967-3cd1-fab859a9a43f
* Version Independent ID: 3368462d-475c-2a21-07db-c23b557c5144
* Content: [Machine Learning model training with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"can you train on AKS in Azure ML?? - Can you train on AKS in Azure ML?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c04a7e7b-ebe4-b967-3cd1-fab859a9a43f
* Version Independent ID: 3368462d-475c-2a21-07db-c23b557c5144
* Content: [Machine Learning model training with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/machine-learning-with-aks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can you train on aks in azure ml can you train on aks in azure ml document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
3512,9695950690.0,IssuesEvent,2019-05-25 02:21:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mention Front Door as an alternative to Traffic Manager?,architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"With the recent release of Front Door, would it make sense to mention it as an alternative to Traffic Manager? It seems to have all the necessary features to support this architecture, including routing, failover, and health probes.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Mention Front Door as an alternative to Traffic Manager? - With the recent release of Front Door, would it make sense to mention it as an alternative to Traffic Manager? It seems to have all the necessary features to support this architecture, including routing, failover, and health probes.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: b0c0c2a8-94a0-67ef-602a-6013bc7aa403
* Version Independent ID: 27705eeb-7853-bd5d-58ac-a07bd6a8a79d
* Content: [Highly available multi-region web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/multi-region.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,mention front door as an alternative to traffic manager with the recent release of front door would it make sense to mention it as an alternative to traffic manager it seems to have all the necessary features to support this architecture including routing failover and health probes document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6228,13956775764.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-24 02:56:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Event Sourcing described well,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc,"
very useful pattern
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Event Sourcing described well -
very useful pattern
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d510272-fa5f-07f9-8b06-fb88d45d2464
* Version Independent ID: 578a488f-89a7-92cc-779f-b4906f6d731a
* Content: [Event Sourcing pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/event-sourcing)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/event-sourcing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,event sourcing described well very useful pattern document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6330,14241308534.0,IssuesEvent,2020-11-18 23:22:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,opened,Azure WebApp private database connectivity,architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc,"
While looking for solution of my use case, I was brought into this page [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app).
However this is not exactly I have designed my architecture. I'm looking for accessing Azure SQL PaaS from Azure WebApp via Managed Identity and Private EndPoint but couldn't find any documentation or guidance.
I have an AspNetCore3.1 app hosted on Linux Azure WebApp with Private Endpoint. I have also enabled system assigned Managed Identity(MI) on the web app and added that as contained user to my Azure SQL PaaS. However, I could not establish sql connection and my app returns errors:
> Connection was denied since Deny Public Network Access is set to Yes (https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/azure-sql/database/connectivity-settings#deny-public-network-access). To connect to this server, use the Private Endpoint from inside your virtual network (https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/sql-database/sql-database-private-endpoint-overview#how-to-set-up-private-link-for-azure-sql-database). at Microsoft.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CheckPoolBlockingPeriod(Exception e)
There is Private Endpoint configured for SQL PaaS too. This one is in different subnet but same VNet as webapp's private endpoint is in.
Is this design supported ? Any links/docs?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7499b146-3340-d7d1-6c5f-3ed508b773cb
* Version Independent ID: 61b10612-1136-3840-c7c1-804e63b23410
* Content: [Web app private connectivity to Azure SQL database - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **jelled**",1.0,"Azure WebApp private database connectivity -
While looking for solution of my use case, I was brought into this page [here](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app).
However this is not exactly I have designed my architecture. I'm looking for accessing Azure SQL PaaS from Azure WebApp via Managed Identity and Private EndPoint but couldn't find any documentation or guidance.
I have an AspNetCore3.1 app hosted on Linux Azure WebApp with Private Endpoint. I have also enabled system assigned Managed Identity(MI) on the web app and added that as contained user to my Azure SQL PaaS. However, I could not establish sql connection and my app returns errors:
> Connection was denied since Deny Public Network Access is set to Yes (https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/azure-sql/database/connectivity-settings#deny-public-network-access). To connect to this server, use the Private Endpoint from inside your virtual network (https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/sql-database/sql-database-private-endpoint-overview#how-to-set-up-private-link-for-azure-sql-database). at Microsoft.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CheckPoolBlockingPeriod(Exception e)
There is Private Endpoint configured for SQL PaaS too. This one is in different subnet but same VNet as webapp's private endpoint is in.
Is this design supported ? Any links/docs?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7499b146-3340-d7d1-6c5f-3ed508b773cb
* Version Independent ID: 61b10612-1136-3840-c7c1-804e63b23410
* Content: [Web app private connectivity to Azure SQL database - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/private-web-app/private-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @jelledruyts
* Microsoft Alias: **jelled**",1,azure webapp private database connectivity while looking for solution of my use case i was brought into this page however this is not exactly i have designed my architecture i m looking for accessing azure sql paas from azure webapp via managed identity and private endpoint but couldn t find any documentation or guidance i have an app hosted on linux azure webapp with private endpoint i have also enabled system assigned managed identity mi on the web app and added that as contained user to my azure sql paas however i could not establish sql connection and my app returns errors connection was denied since deny public network access is set to yes to connect to this server use the private endpoint from inside your virtual network at microsoft data providerbase dbconnectionpool checkpoolblockingperiod exception e there is private endpoint configured for sql paas too this one is in different subnet but same vnet as webapp s private endpoint is in is this design supported any links docs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login jelledruyts microsoft alias jelled ,1
5703,13020963603.0,IssuesEvent,2020-07-27 04:58:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Link to Failure Mode Analysis sample is not working,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug triaged well-architected/subsvc,"Link to Failure Mode Analysis sample is not working
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d4acf791-5dbe-8b1a-2746-9174afef080c
* Version Independent ID: ff3b6772-a869-e0ef-dc00-09d709c6521f
* Content: [Designing resilient Azure applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/Resiliency/app-design#single-points-of-failure-(spof))
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/app-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/app-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Link to Failure Mode Analysis sample is not working - Link to Failure Mode Analysis sample is not working
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d4acf791-5dbe-8b1a-2746-9174afef080c
* Version Independent ID: ff3b6772-a869-e0ef-dc00-09d709c6521f
* Content: [Designing resilient Azure applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/Resiliency/app-design#single-points-of-failure-(spof))
* Content Source: [docs/framework/resiliency/app-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/resiliency/app-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,link to failure mode analysis sample is not working link to failure mode analysis sample is not working document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
11490,30747315068.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-28 16:01:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,real-time API for ML applications?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"Following this article, are there suggested articles or recommendations for connecting existing machine-learned models to an API that can be called for predictions in near-real-time? E.g. a process whereby a client can send data to the API and get back a prediction response from an existing ML model with sub-second latency?
Connecting this article with near-real time ML applications could be a good idea.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 830e1782-9caa-3533-10a0-85a3d4483d24
* Version Independent ID: d66583fa-188c-9dce-b6fd-84b34c0bf315
* Content: [Real-time processing - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"real-time API for ML applications? - Following this article, are there suggested articles or recommendations for connecting existing machine-learned models to an API that can be called for predictions in near-real-time? E.g. a process whereby a client can send data to the API and get back a prediction response from an existing ML model with sub-second latency?
Connecting this article with near-real time ML applications could be a good idea.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 830e1782-9caa-3533-10a0-85a3d4483d24
* Version Independent ID: d66583fa-188c-9dce-b6fd-84b34c0bf315
* Content: [Real-time processing - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/big-data/real-time-processing.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,real time api for ml applications following this article are there suggested articles or recommendations for connecting existing machine learned models to an api that can be called for predictions in near real time e g a process whereby a client can send data to the api and get back a prediction response from an existing ml model with sub second latency connecting this article with near real time ml applications could be a good idea document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
4524,11278440088.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-15 06:46:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,More details required,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"Could you pls send us more details
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0ca97a7c-e27f-7565-29cb-73897ed6e16f
* Version Independent ID: 7f7eac20-58ae-21fc-7551-df13aa20c545
* Content: [Hybrid Identity - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-identity#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"More details required - Could you pls send us more details
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0ca97a7c-e27f-7565-29cb-73897ed6e16f
* Version Independent ID: 7f7eac20-58ae-21fc-7551-df13aa20c545
* Content: [Hybrid Identity - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-identity#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-identity.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-identity.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,more details required could you pls send us more details document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
6144,13783219453.0,IssuesEvent,2020-10-08 18:51:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Typo in doc,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
There is a typo here:
“Access to the Azure Database workspace is controlled using the administrator console.“
Should be:
“Access to the Azure Databricks workspace is controlled using the administrator console.“
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 42385d9e-bf16-c83f-4cc4-bc7819b7c72a
* Version Independent ID: 8ff90608-83ab-fe3f-c01a-5e4e288f28fc
* Content: [Stream processing with Azure Databricks - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Typo in doc -
There is a typo here:
“Access to the Azure Database workspace is controlled using the administrator console.“
Should be:
“Access to the Azure Databricks workspace is controlled using the administrator console.“
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 42385d9e-bf16-c83f-4cc4-bc7819b7c72a
* Version Independent ID: 8ff90608-83ab-fe3f-c01a-5e4e288f28fc
* Content: [Stream processing with Azure Databricks - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/data/stream-processing-databricks.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo in doc there is a typo here “access to the azure database workspace is controlled using the administrator console “ should be “access to the azure databricks workspace is controlled using the administrator console “ document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5007,11942982846.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 22:07:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,azbb broken?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Trying this out, azbb -s <subscription_id> -g onprem-vnet-rg -l <location> -p shared-services-stack.json --deploy trows:
error: error executing az
message:
status: null
arguments: vm list-skus --resource-type virtualMachines --zone false --subscription <id>
However, running az with ""arguments:"" param works fine.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87139748-938e-638e-de1f-94f8becfe1da
* Version Independent ID: b96371e6-defb-3e70-792a-2c0cfdc25b7d
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services#deploy-the-solution)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"azbb broken? - Trying this out, azbb -s <subscription_id> -g onprem-vnet-rg -l <location> -p shared-services-stack.json --deploy trows:
error: error executing az
message:
status: null
arguments: vm list-skus --resource-type virtualMachines --zone false --subscription <id>
However, running az with ""arguments:"" param works fine.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87139748-938e-638e-de1f-94f8becfe1da
* Version Independent ID: b96371e6-defb-3e70-792a-2c0cfdc25b7d
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services#deploy-the-solution)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azbb broken trying this out azbb s lt subscription id gt g onprem vnet rg l lt location gt p shared services stack json deploy trows error error executing az message status null arguments vm list skus resource type virtualmachines zone false subscription lt id gt however running az with arguments param works fine document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id defb content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
3887,10239657597.0,IssuesEvent,2019-08-19 18:47:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Management Groups?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"Hi,
Any plans for adding a naming convention for Management Groups? :-)
Regards Peter
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Management Groups? - Hi,
Any plans for adding a naming convention for Management Groups? :-)
Regards Peter
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,management groups hi any plans for adding a naming convention for management groups regards peter document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9705,25080288310.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-07 18:41:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,typo error should be application subnet,cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hi Team,
it's a great doc. but there is a typo in the doc regarding to this sentence “Application Gateway subnet redirects the packets to Azure Firewall Premium.” it should be ""Application subnet redirects the packets to Azure Firewall Premium"". I see other example also have this typo. could you please help correct it?
Regards,
Vincent
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4f623b3a-09d7-d793-b007-85b59727c1df
* Version Independent ID: ec0506cd-cdba-784c-6832-ea59697dd39c
* Content: [Zero-trust network for web applications with Azure Firewall and Application Gateway - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1.0,"typo error should be application subnet -
[Enter feedback here]
Hi Team,
it's a great doc. but there is a typo in the doc regarding to this sentence “Application Gateway subnet redirects the packets to Azure Firewall Premium.” it should be ""Application subnet redirects the packets to Azure Firewall Premium"". I see other example also have this typo. could you please help correct it?
Regards,
Vincent
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4f623b3a-09d7-d793-b007-85b59727c1df
* Version Independent ID: ec0506cd-cdba-784c-6832-ea59697dd39c
* Content: [Zero-trust network for web applications with Azure Firewall and Application Gateway - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/application-gateway-before-azure-firewall.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1,typo error should be application subnet hi team it s a great doc but there is a typo in the doc regarding to this sentence “application gateway subnet redirects the packets to azure firewall premium ” it should be application subnet redirects the packets to azure firewall premium i see other example also have this typo could you please help correct it regards vincent document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id cdba content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login erjosito microsoft alias jomore ,1
11234,28506239637.0,IssuesEvent,2023-04-18 21:45:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Old Product Name - Azure ATP,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Azure ATP was renamed to Defender for Identity a long time ago. Please update the text on this page as appropriate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d7590665-2688-5da1-54ff-029be05c6376
* Version Independent ID: b1dfa5fa-537e-cf03-bb2f-4b9d79420169
* Content: [Azure Active Directory IDaaS in security operations - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Old Product Name - Azure ATP - Azure ATP was renamed to Defender for Identity a long time ago. Please update the text on this page as appropriate.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d7590665-2688-5da1-54ff-029be05c6376
* Version Independent ID: b1dfa5fa-537e-cf03-bb2f-4b9d79420169
* Content: [Azure Active Directory IDaaS in security operations - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/aadsec/azure-ad-security.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,old product name azure atp azure atp was renamed to defender for identity a long time ago please update the text on this page as appropriate document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
9603,24885800142.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-28 07:39:31,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Usage with pyspark,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Is it possible to use this in pyspark notebooks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Usage with pyspark -
Is it possible to use this in pyspark notebooks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,usage with pyspark is it possible to use this in pyspark notebooks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4828,11743908793.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-12 06:12:03,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,The download content of the Visio file is not reflecting the diagram in the page,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Hi,
(I also saw similar feedback in the closed section which was not answered back by the user).
The content of the Visio file, which can be download in the top section of this page, just below the diagram, will download a file called hybrid-network-architectures.vsdx and includes ""Azure Stack"" components!
This is not the diagram (expressroute-vpn-failover.png) which is displayed on the actual page above!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fec640d8-1064-c083-4313-5e8c23fbc2cf
* Version Independent ID: 5f7c63ca-7ab2-9129-4c34-191286e67af1
* Content: [Connect an on-premises network to Azure using ExpressRoute - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"The download content of the Visio file is not reflecting the diagram in the page - Hi,
(I also saw similar feedback in the closed section which was not answered back by the user).
The content of the Visio file, which can be download in the top section of this page, just below the diagram, will download a file called hybrid-network-architectures.vsdx and includes ""Azure Stack"" components!
This is not the diagram (expressroute-vpn-failover.png) which is displayed on the actual page above!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fec640d8-1064-c083-4313-5e8c23fbc2cf
* Version Independent ID: 5f7c63ca-7ab2-9129-4c34-191286e67af1
* Content: [Connect an on-premises network to Azure using ExpressRoute - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/expressroute-vpn-failover.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,the download content of the visio file is not reflecting the diagram in the page hi i also saw similar feedback in the closed section which was not answered back by the user the content of the visio file which can be download in the top section of this page just below the diagram will download a file called hybrid network architectures vsdx and includes azure stack components this is not the diagram expressroute vpn failover png which is displayed on the actual page above document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
10736,27359085089.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-27 14:45:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,feedback for ci/cd pipeline using azure devops,architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
nice
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 507afae4-129d-4da3-b559-fbd5f93c2a06
* Version Independent ID: 507afae4-129d-4da3-b559-fbd5f93c2a06
* Content: [CI/CD baseline architecture with Azure Pipelines - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/devops-dotnet-baseline)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/devops-dotnet-baseline.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/devops-dotnet-baseline.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1.0,"feedback for ci/cd pipeline using azure devops -
[Enter feedback here]
nice
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 507afae4-129d-4da3-b559-fbd5f93c2a06
* Version Independent ID: 507afae4-129d-4da3-b559-fbd5f93c2a06
* Content: [CI/CD baseline architecture with Azure Pipelines - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/devops-dotnet-baseline)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/devops-dotnet-baseline.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/apps/devops-dotnet-baseline.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @RobBagby
* Microsoft Alias: **robbag**",1,feedback for ci cd pipeline using azure devops nice document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login robbagby microsoft alias robbag ,1
4655,11501975499.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-12 18:11:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,gitflow-branch-workflow.md copied from Atlassian without attribution,Pri3 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc doc-bug triaged,"The content in architecture-center/docs/framework/devops/gitflow-branch-workflow.md is copied from https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/gitflow-workflow.
The original content is licensed under the [Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia License](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/).
While the license means copying the original content is allowed, you must:
- give appropriate credit,
- provide a link to the license, and
- indicate if changes were made.
@kuhlman-labs @david-stanford
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dcba6ac8-d41d-9645-b899-d8977f235eed
* Version Independent ID: ec1b28ff-5c3d-6c71-a46c-078e167826a3
* Content: [GitFlow branch workflow](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/gitflow-branch-workflow)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/gitflow-branch-workflow.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/gitflow-branch-workflow.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @UmarMohamedUsman
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"gitflow-branch-workflow.md copied from Atlassian without attribution - The content in architecture-center/docs/framework/devops/gitflow-branch-workflow.md is copied from https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/comparing-workflows/gitflow-workflow.
The original content is licensed under the [Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia License](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/au/).
While the license means copying the original content is allowed, you must:
- give appropriate credit,
- provide a link to the license, and
- indicate if changes were made.
@kuhlman-labs @david-stanford
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: dcba6ac8-d41d-9645-b899-d8977f235eed
* Version Independent ID: ec1b28ff-5c3d-6c71-a46c-078e167826a3
* Content: [GitFlow branch workflow](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/gitflow-branch-workflow)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/gitflow-branch-workflow.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/gitflow-branch-workflow.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @UmarMohamedUsman
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,gitflow branch workflow md copied from atlassian without attribution the content in architecture center docs framework devops gitflow branch workflow md is copied from the original content is licensed under the while the license means copying the original content is allowed you must give appropriate credit provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made kuhlman labs david stanford document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login umarmohamedusman microsoft alias pnp ,1
4822,11738398716.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-11 16:01:13,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Usability improvement,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"This is a great resource that I think could be improved if each of the decision endpoints (blue boxes) were also links to more information, perhaps the info landing page for each of those services (or maybe something more contextual for someone making this sort of decision). For many people, seeing that the decision tree suggests ""Container Instances"" is good … but leads to the question of ""what's that""?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Decision tree for Azure compute services - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#flowchart)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Usability improvement - This is a great resource that I think could be improved if each of the decision endpoints (blue boxes) were also links to more information, perhaps the info landing page for each of those services (or maybe something more contextual for someone making this sort of decision). For many people, seeing that the decision tree suggests ""Container Instances"" is good … but leads to the question of ""what's that""?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Decision tree for Azure compute services - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree#flowchart)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,usability improvement this is a great resource that i think could be improved if each of the decision endpoints blue boxes were also links to more information perhaps the info landing page for each of those services or maybe something more contextual for someone making this sort of decision for many people seeing that the decision tree suggests container instances is good … but leads to the question of what s that document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
11079,27967575952.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 21:08:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Update Prerequisite information,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"I believe the Prerequisite information about ""Only personal host pools are currently supported."" and ""Azure Files currently doesn't support Azure AD as a Kerberos realm, only Active Directory"" are not accurate anymore, in fact there are other articles that says otherwhise like
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-desktop/deploy-azure-ad-joined-vm#known-limitations
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-virtual-desktop-blog/announcing-public-preview-of-fslogix-profiles-for-azure-ad/ba-p/3019855
and
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/itops-talk-blog/deep-dive-how-azure-ad-kerberos-works/ba-p/3070889
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Version Independent ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Content: [Azure AD join for Azure Virtual Desktop - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1.0,"Update Prerequisite information - I believe the Prerequisite information about ""Only personal host pools are currently supported."" and ""Azure Files currently doesn't support Azure AD as a Kerberos realm, only Active Directory"" are not accurate anymore, in fact there are other articles that says otherwhise like
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-desktop/deploy-azure-ad-joined-vm#known-limitations
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-virtual-desktop-blog/announcing-public-preview-of-fslogix-profiles-for-azure-ad/ba-p/3019855
and
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/itops-talk-blog/deep-dive-how-azure-ad-kerberos-works/ba-p/3070889
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Version Independent ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Content: [Azure AD join for Azure Virtual Desktop - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1,update prerequisite information i believe the prerequisite information about only personal host pools are currently supported and azure files currently doesn t support azure ad as a kerberos realm only active directory are not accurate anymore in fact there are other articles that says otherwhise like and document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login tomhickling microsoft alias thhickli ,1
9222,24253699718.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 15:58:02,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mislabeled graph,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"Pretty sure the #5 is meant to be labeled ""User access"" or something to that effect. Admin access appears twice as it is.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Mislabeled graph - Pretty sure the #5 is meant to be labeled ""User access"" or something to that effect. Admin access appears twice as it is.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,mislabeled graph pretty sure the is meant to be labeled user access or something to that effect admin access appears twice as it is document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10994,27716450524.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-14 17:15:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Files Premium too slow for kubernetes use,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Azure Files Premium is way too slow for Kubernetes use, so it shouldn't be suggested to use it. See https://github.com/Azure/AKS/issues/223
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2edf62c9-d5c7-b4d0-99e7-f271ef0b629e
* Version Independent ID: d9ff7f72-3fbb-3bc6-e787-60b1ccecb698
* Content: [Magento e-commerce platform in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Files Premium too slow for kubernetes use - Azure Files Premium is way too slow for Kubernetes use, so it shouldn't be suggested to use it. See https://github.com/Azure/AKS/issues/223
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2edf62c9-d5c7-b4d0-99e7-f271ef0b629e
* Version Independent ID: d9ff7f72-3fbb-3bc6-e787-60b1ccecb698
* Content: [Magento e-commerce platform in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure files premium too slow for kubernetes use azure files premium is way too slow for kubernetes use so it shouldn t be suggested to use it see document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9717,25104527682.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:44:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Create a paragraph dealing specifically with empty sets,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 best-practice/subsvc,"
Hi,
My team is using the [api-design](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design) doc as a guideline to build our APIs and we had some disagreements on how to deal with empty sets, I think the documentation could be more clear about this specific scenario.
[This](https://github.com/microsoft/api-guidelines/blob/vNext/Guidelines.md#910-empty-results) microsoft doc says that the proper response is 200 with the metadata and an empty set in the body, which I think is the way to do it as well, but the docs leave it up to interpretation, and [this](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design#get-methods) section makes it a little more confusing.
Regards
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad651d6a-f8d8-2050-e7a7-adbae7326112
* Version Independent ID: 4fddd724-cabd-8623-7692-857088c1dccb
* Content: [API design guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Create a paragraph dealing specifically with empty sets -
Hi,
My team is using the [api-design](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design) doc as a guideline to build our APIs and we had some disagreements on how to deal with empty sets, I think the documentation could be more clear about this specific scenario.
[This](https://github.com/microsoft/api-guidelines/blob/vNext/Guidelines.md#910-empty-results) microsoft doc says that the proper response is 200 with the metadata and an empty set in the body, which I think is the way to do it as well, but the docs leave it up to interpretation, and [this](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design#get-methods) section makes it a little more confusing.
Regards
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad651d6a-f8d8-2050-e7a7-adbae7326112
* Version Independent ID: 4fddd724-cabd-8623-7692-857088c1dccb
* Content: [API design guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,create a paragraph dealing specifically with empty sets hi my team is using the doc as a guideline to build our apis and we had some disagreements on how to deal with empty sets i think the documentation could be more clear about this specific scenario microsoft doc says that the proper response is with the metadata and an empty set in the body which i think is the way to do it as well but the docs leave it up to interpretation and section makes it a little more confusing regards document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id cabd content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
7695,18892878163.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-15 14:59:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Unhelpful links,assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc,"The September section contains links to ""Updated"" articles, when I click on them they open pages that we updated in March and April, this is not very helpful. What is the purpose of this section?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Unhelpful links - The September section contains links to ""Updated"" articles, when I click on them they open pages that we updated in March and April, this is not very helpful. What is the purpose of this section?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0dd7bc22-da10-1d3b-ba22-7d5e374be441
* Version Independent ID: 9f466c91-adc7-0489-5b1e-17633d27c98c
* Content: [What's New in Azure Architecture Center - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/changelog)
* Content Source: [docs/changelog.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/changelog.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,unhelpful links the september section contains links to updated articles when i click on them they open pages that we updated in march and april this is not very helpful what is the purpose of this section document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9714,25103837955.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:19:49,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Invalid C# syntax in code sample,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
Hello,
It appears that the code sample for the referenced documentation contains some invalid C# syntax, and given the code, it's not clear how to check if the device needs an SMS wakeup.
`if (var == [DeviceNotConnected] && connTimeOut == 0)`
I'm not sure where ""DeviceNotConnected"" is coming from, and I don't believe the use of `var` here or later in the method is valid.
Full code sample:
`TimeSpan connTimeOut = FromSeconds(0); // Period to wait for device to connect.
TimeSpan funcTimeOut = FromSeconds(30); // Period to wait for method to execute.
while (true) {
// Send the command via direct method. Initially use a timeout of zero
// for the connection, which determines whether the device is connected to
// IoT Hub or needs an SMS wakeup sent to it.
var method = new CloudToDeviceMethod(""RemoteCommand"", funcTimeOut, connTimeOut);
methodInvocation1.SetPayloadJson(CommandPayload);
var response = await serviceClient.InvokeDeviceMethodAsync(deviceId, method);
if (var == [DeviceNotConnected] && connTimeOut == 0) {
// The device is not currently connected and needs an SMS wakeup. This
// device should wake up within a period of < 30 seconds. Send the wakeup
// and retry the method request with a 30 second timeout on waiting for
// the device to connect.
connTimeOut = FromSeconds(30); // Set a 30 second connection timeout.
SendAsyncSMSWakeUpToDevice(); // Send SMS wakeup through mobile gateway.
continue; // Retry with new connection timeout.
} else {
// The method either succeeded or failed.
ActOnMethodResult(var);
break;
}
}`
Thank you!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7b2f7457-51f0-b9e0-04bd-dabbe3586b34
* Version Independent ID: 08b9268e-c8d1-5259-0f0d-3fc851f35dbe
* Content: [IoT application-to-device commands - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot/cloud-to-device)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/iot/cloud-to-device.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/iot/cloud-to-device.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @wamachine
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Invalid C# syntax in code sample -
Hello,
It appears that the code sample for the referenced documentation contains some invalid C# syntax, and given the code, it's not clear how to check if the device needs an SMS wakeup.
`if (var == [DeviceNotConnected] && connTimeOut == 0)`
I'm not sure where ""DeviceNotConnected"" is coming from, and I don't believe the use of `var` here or later in the method is valid.
Full code sample:
`TimeSpan connTimeOut = FromSeconds(0); // Period to wait for device to connect.
TimeSpan funcTimeOut = FromSeconds(30); // Period to wait for method to execute.
while (true) {
// Send the command via direct method. Initially use a timeout of zero
// for the connection, which determines whether the device is connected to
// IoT Hub or needs an SMS wakeup sent to it.
var method = new CloudToDeviceMethod(""RemoteCommand"", funcTimeOut, connTimeOut);
methodInvocation1.SetPayloadJson(CommandPayload);
var response = await serviceClient.InvokeDeviceMethodAsync(deviceId, method);
if (var == [DeviceNotConnected] && connTimeOut == 0) {
// The device is not currently connected and needs an SMS wakeup. This
// device should wake up within a period of < 30 seconds. Send the wakeup
// and retry the method request with a 30 second timeout on waiting for
// the device to connect.
connTimeOut = FromSeconds(30); // Set a 30 second connection timeout.
SendAsyncSMSWakeUpToDevice(); // Send SMS wakeup through mobile gateway.
continue; // Retry with new connection timeout.
} else {
// The method either succeeded or failed.
ActOnMethodResult(var);
break;
}
}`
Thank you!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7b2f7457-51f0-b9e0-04bd-dabbe3586b34
* Version Independent ID: 08b9268e-c8d1-5259-0f0d-3fc851f35dbe
* Content: [IoT application-to-device commands - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/iot/cloud-to-device)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/iot/cloud-to-device.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/iot/cloud-to-device.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @wamachine
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,invalid c syntax in code sample hello it appears that the code sample for the referenced documentation contains some invalid c syntax and given the code it s not clear how to check if the device needs an sms wakeup if var conntimeout i m not sure where devicenotconnected is coming from and i don t believe the use of var here or later in the method is valid full code sample timespan conntimeout fromseconds period to wait for device to connect timespan functimeout fromseconds period to wait for method to execute while true send the command via direct method initially use a timeout of zero for the connection which determines whether the device is connected to iot hub or needs an sms wakeup sent to it var method new cloudtodevicemethod remotecommand functimeout conntimeout setpayloadjson commandpayload var response await serviceclient invokedevicemethodasync deviceid method if var conntimeout the device is not currently connected and needs an sms wakeup this device should wake up within a period of seconds send the wakeup and retry the method request with a second timeout on waiting for the device to connect conntimeout fromseconds set a second connection timeout sendasyncsmswakeuptodevice send sms wakeup through mobile gateway continue retry with new connection timeout else the method either succeeded or failed actonmethodresult var break thank you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login wamachine microsoft alias pnp ,1
5994,13463422145.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-09 17:33:54,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Bash shell script in ""Create Dashboard"" section doesn't work as expected",Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-feedback reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Output is: sed: 1: ""/workspace/c\ \t\t\t"" ..."": extra characters after \ at the end of c command]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e17f2434-814c-4ebc-c05d-501566aa3c0f
* Version Independent ID: 6cf80861-2ab6-0c28-8a68-4f641491a61a
* Content: [Use dashboards to visualize Azure Databricks metrics - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/dashboards)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/dashboards.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/dashboards.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Bash shell script in ""Create Dashboard"" section doesn't work as expected -
[Output is: sed: 1: ""/workspace/c\ \t\t\t"" ..."": extra characters after \ at the end of c command]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: e17f2434-814c-4ebc-c05d-501566aa3c0f
* Version Independent ID: 6cf80861-2ab6-0c28-8a68-4f641491a61a
* Content: [Use dashboards to visualize Azure Databricks metrics - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/dashboards)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/dashboards.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/dashboards.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,bash shell script in create dashboard section doesn t work as expected document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4988,11941963758.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 19:24:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Provide more information on what Layer 7 means / HTTP(S) versus non-HTTP(S),Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The section HTTP(S) versus non-HTTP(S) starts with a paragraph like:
> HTTP(S) load-balancing services are Layer 7 load balancers that only accept HTTP(S) traffic. They are intended for web applications or other HTTP(S) endpoints. They include features such as SSL offload, web application firewall, path-based load balancing, and session affinity.
Perhaps expanding on what Layer 7 means (link to OSI model description from wikipedia or something like that) and oppose that to what an HTTP load balancer is in OSI model would help people draw a mental model of what each of those entail.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @sharad4u
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Provide more information on what Layer 7 means / HTTP(S) versus non-HTTP(S) - The section HTTP(S) versus non-HTTP(S) starts with a paragraph like:
> HTTP(S) load-balancing services are Layer 7 load balancers that only accept HTTP(S) traffic. They are intended for web applications or other HTTP(S) endpoints. They include features such as SSL offload, web application firewall, path-based load balancing, and session affinity.
Perhaps expanding on what Layer 7 means (link to OSI model description from wikipedia or something like that) and oppose that to what an HTTP load balancer is in OSI model would help people draw a mental model of what each of those entail.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 936c85d9-c953-2def-c399-77cbda32b24d
* Version Independent ID: 9173c834-2c40-9169-b13b-6273759a2c8a
* Content: [Overview of Azure load-balancing options - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/load-balancing-overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @sharad4u
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,provide more information on what layer means http s versus non http s the section http s versus non http s starts with a paragraph like http s load balancing services are layer load balancers that only accept http s traffic they are intended for web applications or other http s endpoints they include features such as ssl offload web application firewall path based load balancing and session affinity perhaps expanding on what layer means link to osi model description from wikipedia or something like that and oppose that to what an http load balancer is in osi model would help people draw a mental model of what each of those entail document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
7207,17087694265.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-08 13:49:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Misspelled word,architecture-center/svc well-architected/subsvc,"Below sentence under ""Fault Injection"" topic has a misspelled word: ""pourposley""
Shutting down infrastructure components, **pourposley** degrading performance, or introducing faults are ways of verifying that the application is going to react as expected when these situations occur.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5d90d3cc-8d25-3331-0647-e93017a41548
* Version Independent ID: afa8af69-58b9-bcb6-5edc-34e0b12e7614
* Content: [Testing your application and Azure environment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/release-engineering-testing)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/release-engineering-testing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/release-engineering-testing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @Jose-Moreno
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Misspelled word - Below sentence under ""Fault Injection"" topic has a misspelled word: ""pourposley""
Shutting down infrastructure components, **pourposley** degrading performance, or introducing faults are ways of verifying that the application is going to react as expected when these situations occur.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 5d90d3cc-8d25-3331-0647-e93017a41548
* Version Independent ID: afa8af69-58b9-bcb6-5edc-34e0b12e7614
* Content: [Testing your application and Azure environment - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/devops/release-engineering-testing)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/devops/release-engineering-testing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/devops/release-engineering-testing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **well-architected**
* GitHub Login: @Jose-Moreno
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,misspelled word below sentence under fault injection topic has a misspelled word pourposley shutting down infrastructure components pourposley degrading performance or introducing faults are ways of verifying that the application is going to react as expected when these situations occur document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service well architected github login jose moreno microsoft alias pnp ,1
9677,25018194785.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-03 20:54:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Logical flaw in ""lift & shift"" path",assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"There is a logical flaw in the ""lift & shift"" path of the ""Choose a candidate service"" flowchart.
In the path following ""lift & shift"", there is a decision ""can it be containaerized?"". If you follow the ""No"" path, it leads to a decision ""COTS app that can't be containerized?"". This is the flaw: it is already decided at this point, that the app can't be containerized. So the decision that is left is basically ""COTS app?"" instead of ""COTS app that can't be containerized?"".
This should be fixed IMHO.
Further thoughts of mine:
if the app is a COTS app, the flowchart advises to use a VM. Now if it isn't a COTS app, you should use app services. But there are limitations for app services (such as the supported frameworks, etc.) which would not allow running any non-COTS app on app services.
Anyway, I find it great that there is some advice on which platform you should run COTS apps (here: VM). I already ran COTS apps on app services, which kind of worked, but I was left with the impression that this is rather an unusual usage for app services (as there was little documentation on this usage scenario). So I appreciate some official statement to this scenario very much.
Thanks for the architecture docs!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Logical flaw in ""lift & shift"" path - There is a logical flaw in the ""lift & shift"" path of the ""Choose a candidate service"" flowchart.
In the path following ""lift & shift"", there is a decision ""can it be containaerized?"". If you follow the ""No"" path, it leads to a decision ""COTS app that can't be containerized?"". This is the flaw: it is already decided at this point, that the app can't be containerized. So the decision that is left is basically ""COTS app?"" instead of ""COTS app that can't be containerized?"".
This should be fixed IMHO.
Further thoughts of mine:
if the app is a COTS app, the flowchart advises to use a VM. Now if it isn't a COTS app, you should use app services. But there are limitations for app services (such as the supported frameworks, etc.) which would not allow running any non-COTS app on app services.
Anyway, I find it great that there is some advice on which platform you should run COTS apps (here: VM). I already ran COTS apps on app services, which kind of worked, but I was left with the impression that this is rather an unusual usage for app services (as there was little documentation on this usage scenario). So I appreciate some official statement to this scenario very much.
Thanks for the architecture docs!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,logical flaw in lift shift path there is a logical flaw in the lift shift path of the choose a candidate service flowchart in the path following lift shift there is a decision can it be containaerized if you follow the no path it leads to a decision cots app that can t be containerized this is the flaw it is already decided at this point that the app can t be containerized so the decision that is left is basically cots app instead of cots app that can t be containerized this should be fixed imho further thoughts of mine if the app is a cots app the flowchart advises to use a vm now if it isn t a cots app you should use app services but there are limitations for app services such as the supported frameworks etc which would not allow running any non cots app on app services anyway i find it great that there is some advice on which platform you should run cots apps here vm i already ran cots apps on app services which kind of worked but i was left with the impression that this is rather an unusual usage for app services as there was little documentation on this usage scenario so i appreciate some official statement to this scenario very much thanks for the architecture docs document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
7754,19093630932.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-29 14:38:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Suggestion: Use Event Sourcing as configuration store,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc design-pattern/subsvc,"Event sourcing could be the configuration store. The applications can read the configuration from the materialized views and can be event consumers that listen to the configuration changes. The benefits are:
1. Full history audit
2. Configuration recovery by going back to a snapshot or issuing compensating events
3. Separation of configuration update and configuration read for performance and resiliency
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 32a97c79-e300-9361-a398-558ae26378ce
* Version Independent ID: 30f222db-c119-69c7-f542-87e012890026
* Content: [External Configuration Store pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/external-configuration-store)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/external-configuration-store.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/external-configuration-store.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @ckittel
* Microsoft Alias: **chkittel**",1.0,"Suggestion: Use Event Sourcing as configuration store - Event sourcing could be the configuration store. The applications can read the configuration from the materialized views and can be event consumers that listen to the configuration changes. The benefits are:
1. Full history audit
2. Configuration recovery by going back to a snapshot or issuing compensating events
3. Separation of configuration update and configuration read for performance and resiliency
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 32a97c79-e300-9361-a398-558ae26378ce
* Version Independent ID: 30f222db-c119-69c7-f542-87e012890026
* Content: [External Configuration Store pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/external-configuration-store)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/external-configuration-store.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/external-configuration-store.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **design-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @ckittel
* Microsoft Alias: **chkittel**",1,suggestion use event sourcing as configuration store event sourcing could be the configuration store the applications can read the configuration from the materialized views and can be event consumers that listen to the configuration changes the benefits are full history audit configuration recovery by going back to a snapshot or issuing compensating events separation of configuration update and configuration read for performance and resiliency document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service design pattern github login ckittel microsoft alias chkittel ,1
3536,9740191761.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-01 18:05:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AzureUSGovernment Subscription,architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Stepping through deploying the solution on US Gov and after I set az cli to AuzreUSGovernment and run the azbb command to Deploy the simulated on-premises datacenter, I get a:
_**Switched**_ active cloud to 'AzureCloud'
For some reason, the template is reverting back to AzureCloud and not allowing me to deploy in Azure Gov.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87139748-938e-638e-de1f-94f8becfe1da
* Version Independent ID: b96371e6-defb-3e70-792a-2c0cfdc25b7d
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services#deploy-the-solution)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"AzureUSGovernment Subscription - Stepping through deploying the solution on US Gov and after I set az cli to AuzreUSGovernment and run the azbb command to Deploy the simulated on-premises datacenter, I get a:
_**Switched**_ active cloud to 'AzureCloud'
For some reason, the template is reverting back to AzureCloud and not allowing me to deploy in Azure Gov.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 87139748-938e-638e-de1f-94f8becfe1da
* Version Independent ID: b96371e6-defb-3e70-792a-2c0cfdc25b7d
* Content: [Implement a hub-spoke network topology - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services#deploy-the-solution)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/shared-services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azureusgovernment subscription stepping through deploying the solution on us gov and after i set az cli to auzreusgovernment and run the azbb command to deploy the simulated on premises datacenter i get a switched active cloud to azurecloud for some reason the template is reverting back to azurecloud and not allowing me to deploy in azure gov document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id defb content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9415,24552122840.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-12 13:22:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Impossible recommendation ""Use automatic failover but manual failback""",assigned-to-author docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"The following recommendation is impossible.
```
Use automatic failover but manual failback. Use Traffic Manager for automatic failover, but not for automatic failback. Automatic failback carries a risk that you might switch to the primary region before the region is completely healthy. Instead, verify that all application subsystems are healthy before manually failing back. Also, depending on the database, you might need to check data consistency before failing back.
```
Traffic Manager does not have manual failback feature or config, so when the primary region or endpoint is online again, Traffic Manager route traffic automatically to the primary. In other words, Traffic Manager always do automatic failback.
Could you please confirm if my understanding is correct and if this recommendation is valid? Thanks in advance.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 64a14304-4ef8-dc1b-b92d-b021fc169710
* Version Independent ID: 33ad8550-7676-2b43-f6cc-a9eb3d3f2093
* Content: [Make all things redundant - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/design-principles/redundancy)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/design-principles/redundancy.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/design-principles/redundancy.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Impossible recommendation ""Use automatic failover but manual failback"" - The following recommendation is impossible.
```
Use automatic failover but manual failback. Use Traffic Manager for automatic failover, but not for automatic failback. Automatic failback carries a risk that you might switch to the primary region before the region is completely healthy. Instead, verify that all application subsystems are healthy before manually failing back. Also, depending on the database, you might need to check data consistency before failing back.
```
Traffic Manager does not have manual failback feature or config, so when the primary region or endpoint is online again, Traffic Manager route traffic automatically to the primary. In other words, Traffic Manager always do automatic failback.
Could you please confirm if my understanding is correct and if this recommendation is valid? Thanks in advance.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 64a14304-4ef8-dc1b-b92d-b021fc169710
* Version Independent ID: 33ad8550-7676-2b43-f6cc-a9eb3d3f2093
* Content: [Make all things redundant - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/design-principles/redundancy)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/design-principles/redundancy.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/design-principles/redundancy.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,impossible recommendation use automatic failover but manual failback the following recommendation is impossible use automatic failover but manual failback use traffic manager for automatic failover but not for automatic failback automatic failback carries a risk that you might switch to the primary region before the region is completely healthy instead verify that all application subsystems are healthy before manually failing back also depending on the database you might need to check data consistency before failing back traffic manager does not have manual failback feature or config so when the primary region or endpoint is online again traffic manager route traffic automatically to the primary in other words traffic manager always do automatic failback could you please confirm if my understanding is correct and if this recommendation is valid thanks in advance document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
11049,27849683403.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-20 17:47:11,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Document running of background jobs in Azure Container Apps. ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 best-practice/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Add info for running background jobs in Azure Container Apps.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Document running of background jobs in Azure Container Apps. -
[Enter feedback here]
Add info for running background jobs in Azure Container Apps.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 50a65e47-b024-0c7c-0ee9-21ff095abafd
* Version Independent ID: a764689a-168d-dcef-a297-c47f84ea2d12
* Content: [Background jobs guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/background-jobs)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/background-jobs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,document running of background jobs in azure container apps add info for running background jobs in azure container apps document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id dcef content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9765,25166439106.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 21:19:51,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Public Preview of FSLogix profiles for Azure AD-joined VMs in Azure Virtual Desktop,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Looks like this article needs an udpate? https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-virtual-desktop-blog/announcing-public-preview-of-fslogix-profiles-for-azure-ad/ba-p/3019855
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Version Independent ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Content: [Azure AD join for Azure Virtual Desktop - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1.0,"Public Preview of FSLogix profiles for Azure AD-joined VMs in Azure Virtual Desktop -
Looks like this article needs an udpate? https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-virtual-desktop-blog/announcing-public-preview-of-fslogix-profiles-for-azure-ad/ba-p/3019855
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Version Independent ID: 96947883-d52b-1ed8-7db2-915f025060af
* Content: [Azure AD join for Azure Virtual Desktop - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-azure-active-directory-join.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @TomHickling
* Microsoft Alias: **thhickli**",1,public preview of fslogix profiles for azure ad joined vms in azure virtual desktop looks like this article needs an udpate document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login tomhickling microsoft alias thhickli ,1
6464,14597155175.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-20 18:52:32,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Deploy Solution not working,architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
The link to Github to deploy the solution is broken.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 49d69a9c-86d9-c2bf-de02-ae2dc851a086
* Version Independent ID: a17ffde4-5e77-2749-05c9-b5ec7340b7bf
* Content: [Extend an on-premises network using VPN - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/vpn)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/vpn.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/vpn.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Deploy Solution not working -
The link to Github to deploy the solution is broken.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 49d69a9c-86d9-c2bf-de02-ae2dc851a086
* Version Independent ID: a17ffde4-5e77-2749-05c9-b5ec7340b7bf
* Content: [Extend an on-premises network using VPN - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/vpn)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/vpn.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/vpn.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,deploy solution not working the link to github to deploy the solution is broken document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10032,26077819921.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-24 20:54:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,bitcoin kullanımı,architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
[Geri bildiriminizi buraya girin]
---
#### Belge Ayrıntıları
⚠ *Bu bölümü düzenlemeyin. learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub sorunu bağlantısı için gereklidir.*
* ID: d94c104e-d85e-bbc5-dd3b-2018fcf01f25
* Version Independent ID: d94c104e-d85e-bbc5-dd3b-2018fcf01f25
* Content: [Azure giriş bölgesinde görev açısından kritik temel mimari - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/tr-tr/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-mission-critical/mission-critical-landing-zone?source=recommendations)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-mission-critical/mission-critical-landing-zone.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-mission-critical/mission-critical-landing-zone.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @hjscherer
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",2.0,"bitcoin kullanımı -
[Geri bildiriminizi buraya girin]
---
#### Belge Ayrıntıları
⚠ *Bu bölümü düzenlemeyin. learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub sorunu bağlantısı için gereklidir.*
* ID: d94c104e-d85e-bbc5-dd3b-2018fcf01f25
* Version Independent ID: d94c104e-d85e-bbc5-dd3b-2018fcf01f25
* Content: [Azure giriş bölgesinde görev açısından kritik temel mimari - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/tr-tr/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks-mission-critical/mission-critical-landing-zone?source=recommendations)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-mission-critical/mission-critical-landing-zone.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks-mission-critical/mission-critical-landing-zone.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @hjscherer
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",1,bitcoin kullanımı belge ayrıntıları ⚠ bu bölümü düzenlemeyin learn microsoft com ➟ github sorunu bağlantısı için gereklidir id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login hjscherer microsoft alias prwilk ,1
9924,25601324921.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-01 20:28:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Cluster set is not supported in Stack HCI,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
Please remove the reference to 'cluster set' as this is not supported by Stack HCI. We have had clarification from PG that they do not support cluster set with Stack HCI and they have removed those references from the Stack HCI docs but it still exists in this one.
See the internal thread 'Does ""Deploy a cluster set"" support AS HCI ' in 'hcitalk' for reference.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7cd80767-6e29-65b6-4b98-42d36bd3ad33
* Version Independent ID: 7fc8bbde-f74a-74f7-f93e-de7660df740c
* Content: [Use Azure Stack HCI stretched clusters for disaster recovery - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/azure-stack-hci-dr)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/azure-stack-hci-dr.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/hybrid/azure-stack-hci-dr.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",2.0,"Cluster set is not supported in Stack HCI -
Please remove the reference to 'cluster set' as this is not supported by Stack HCI. We have had clarification from PG that they do not support cluster set with Stack HCI and they have removed those references from the Stack HCI docs but it still exists in this one.
See the internal thread 'Does ""Deploy a cluster set"" support AS HCI ' in 'hcitalk' for reference.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7cd80767-6e29-65b6-4b98-42d36bd3ad33
* Version Independent ID: 7fc8bbde-f74a-74f7-f93e-de7660df740c
* Content: [Use Azure Stack HCI stretched clusters for disaster recovery - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/hybrid/azure-stack-hci-dr)
* Content Source: [docs/hybrid/azure-stack-hci-dr.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/hybrid/azure-stack-hci-dr.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,cluster set is not supported in stack hci please remove the reference to cluster set as this is not supported by stack hci we have had clarification from pg that they do not support cluster set with stack hci and they have removed those references from the stack hci docs but it still exists in this one see the internal thread does deploy a cluster set support as hci in hcitalk for reference document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
9120,24055646504.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 16:34:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Possibly wrong category for scenario,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Should this scenario really be categorized/organized as ""DevOps""? Perhaps Web or Mobile would be more fitting?
/C
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 36cc3d81-d33a-bc9b-ab91-d7c4c8e26a95
* Version Independent ID: d3ce3924-f004-a61a-867c-b81fae8cf5f9
* Content: [Sharing location in real time using low-cost serverless Azure services - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/signalr/)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/signalr/index.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/signalr/index.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @talhanaveed
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Possibly wrong category for scenario - Should this scenario really be categorized/organized as ""DevOps""? Perhaps Web or Mobile would be more fitting?
/C
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 36cc3d81-d33a-bc9b-ab91-d7c4c8e26a95
* Version Independent ID: d3ce3924-f004-a61a-867c-b81fae8cf5f9
* Content: [Sharing location in real time using low-cost serverless Azure services - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/signalr/)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/signalr/index.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/signalr/index.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @talhanaveed
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,possibly wrong category for scenario should this scenario really be categorized organized as devops perhaps web or mobile would be more fitting c document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login talhanaveed microsoft alias pnp ,1
11069,27958398674.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-24 14:01:29,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,[VM extensions] and [Azure Automation] are not same funtions about [AWS Cloud Formation].,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri1,"[VM extensions] and [Azure Automation] are not same funtions about [AWS Cloud Formation].
[AWS Cloud Formation] is recovery tool for AWS setting.
Therefore,[VM extensions] and [Azure Automation] mistook.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#devops-and-application-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1.0,"[VM extensions] and [Azure Automation] are not same funtions about [AWS Cloud Formation]. - [VM extensions] and [Azure Automation] are not same funtions about [AWS Cloud Formation].
[AWS Cloud Formation] is recovery tool for AWS setting.
Therefore,[VM extensions] and [Azure Automation] mistook.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services#devops-and-application-monitoring)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yuanzhiqu**",1, and are not same funtions about and are not same funtions about is recovery tool for aws setting therefore and mistook document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login edprice msft microsoft alias yuanzhiqu ,1
4680,11574643455.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-21 07:55:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Name of Visual Studio Team Services not changed to Azure DevOps,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"Name from VSTS has not been changed to Azure DevOps in the architecture diagram
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 20546dde-32a4-9fa5-899e-eb6e60f5cbf9
* Version Independent ID: 55a03d85-415e-4b93-1082-fbbf92712801
* Content: [Hybrid CI/CD - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-ci-cd#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-ci-cd.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-ci-cd.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Name of Visual Studio Team Services not changed to Azure DevOps - Name from VSTS has not been changed to Azure DevOps in the architecture diagram
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 20546dde-32a4-9fa5-899e-eb6e60f5cbf9
* Version Independent ID: 55a03d85-415e-4b93-1082-fbbf92712801
* Content: [Hybrid CI/CD - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-ci-cd#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-ci-cd.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/hybrid-ci-cd.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,name of visual studio team services not changed to azure devops name from vsts has not been changed to azure devops in the architecture diagram document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9128,24058985448.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 19:57:07,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,why mount directly to /mnt instead of /mnt/resource?,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
What was the impetus for this change? What technical expert signed off on mounting the temp disk directly to /mnt?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8af3a0e6-6629-3044-4bdc-4f73a6f77861
* Version Independent ID: a93c0dc1-678d-2319-d850-ca3dca213b74
* Content: [Run a Linux VM on Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/linux-vm)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/linux-vm.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/linux-vm.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"why mount directly to /mnt instead of /mnt/resource? -
What was the impetus for this change? What technical expert signed off on mounting the temp disk directly to /mnt?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8af3a0e6-6629-3044-4bdc-4f73a6f77861
* Version Independent ID: a93c0dc1-678d-2319-d850-ca3dca213b74
* Content: [Run a Linux VM on Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/n-tier/linux-vm)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/linux-vm.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/n-tier/linux-vm.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,why mount directly to mnt instead of mnt resource what was the impetus for this change what technical expert signed off on mounting the temp disk directly to mnt document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
5451,12499016350.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-01 19:22:05,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Content is broken,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
I'm interested in this solution, but a lot of the content has been moved or is broken. Has Microsoft abandoned this or is there a newer version somewhere else?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 495425b0-36b2-9391-b1ef-b2ec2e7f3423
* Version Independent ID: e9ab6970-e1d7-5780-606b-50e35f0676fd
* Content: [Anomaly Detection in Real-time Data Streams - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detection-in-real-time-data-streams)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detection-in-real-time-data-streams.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detection-in-real-time-data-streams.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Content is broken -
I'm interested in this solution, but a lot of the content has been moved or is broken. Has Microsoft abandoned this or is there a newer version somewhere else?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 495425b0-36b2-9391-b1ef-b2ec2e7f3423
* Version Independent ID: e9ab6970-e1d7-5780-606b-50e35f0676fd
* Content: [Anomaly Detection in Real-time Data Streams - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detection-in-real-time-data-streams)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detection-in-real-time-data-streams.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detection-in-real-time-data-streams.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,content is broken i m interested in this solution but a lot of the content has been moved or is broken has microsoft abandoned this or is there a newer version somewhere else document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
4526,11278498557.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-15 06:57:48,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio link is wrong,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The link to the Visio doc at teh top of the page appears to go to the Identity Architectures ref arch rather than this ref arch.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Extend your on-premises Active Directory domain to Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Visio link is wrong - The link to the Visio doc at teh top of the page appears to go to the Identity Architectures ref arch rather than this ref arch.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Extend your on-premises Active Directory domain to Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio link is wrong the link to the visio doc at teh top of the page appears to go to the identity architectures ref arch rather than this ref arch document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
11340,30117982300.0,IssuesEvent,2023-06-30 13:05:25,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Missing diagrams,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri3 azure-guide/subsvc,"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/compliance-risk-analysis
There are missing diagrams from the PPTX.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/media/compliance-risk-analysis-diagram-solution-architecture.png#lightbox : is not in the PPTX
Are they in another location?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d9c082a-2e3d-2590-cebe-07ed385fbe4a
* Version Independent ID: 2d9c082a-2e3d-2590-cebe-07ed385fbe4a
* Content: [Compliance risk analysis by using Azure Cognitive Search - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/compliance-risk-analysis)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/ai/compliance-risk-analysis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/ai/compliance-risk-analysis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @andreaskopp
* Microsoft Alias: **akopp, cfernandesdo, joamart**
",1.0,"Missing diagrams - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/compliance-risk-analysis
There are missing diagrams from the PPTX.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/media/compliance-risk-analysis-diagram-solution-architecture.png#lightbox : is not in the PPTX
Are they in another location?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2d9c082a-2e3d-2590-cebe-07ed385fbe4a
* Version Independent ID: 2d9c082a-2e3d-2590-cebe-07ed385fbe4a
* Content: [Compliance risk analysis by using Azure Cognitive Search - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/ai/compliance-risk-analysis)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/ai/compliance-risk-analysis.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/ai/compliance-risk-analysis.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @andreaskopp
* Microsoft Alias: **akopp, cfernandesdo, joamart**
",1,missing diagrams there are missing diagrams from the pptx is not in the pptx are they in another location document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id cebe version independent id cebe content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login andreaskopp microsoft alias akopp cfernandesdo joamart ,1
9191,24191244952.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-23 17:48:45,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Image Gallery Regional BCDR,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"I'd like clarification on availability of Compute Galleries in the event of regional failure.
According to this page _""You should store images in the Azure Compute Gallery and configure multiple image replicas in both the primary and the secondary locations.""_
however in this article https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/azure-compute-gallery
it states ""_1 The Azure Compute Gallery service is not a global resource. For disaster recovery scenarios, it is a best practice is to have at least two galleries, in different regions.""_
It seems the solution, say for a UKW/UKS deployment would be to have a compute gallery in each region. However if two compute galleries are used it is not immediately clear to me how we replicate images between them, once a machine is genaralised and committed to an image gallery it is deleted.
How can we replicate between compute galleries?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7a02ac6f-a170-0558-faac-98f669d0e030
* Version Independent ID: 7a02ac6f-a170-0558-faac-98f669d0e030
* Content: [Multiregion BCDR for Azure Virtual Desktop - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-multi-region-bcdr#compute)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-multi-region-bcdr.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-multi-region-bcdr.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @igorpag
* Microsoft Alias: **igorpag**",1.0,"Image Gallery Regional BCDR - I'd like clarification on availability of Compute Galleries in the event of regional failure.
According to this page _""You should store images in the Azure Compute Gallery and configure multiple image replicas in both the primary and the secondary locations.""_
however in this article https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-machines/azure-compute-gallery
it states ""_1 The Azure Compute Gallery service is not a global resource. For disaster recovery scenarios, it is a best practice is to have at least two galleries, in different regions.""_
It seems the solution, say for a UKW/UKS deployment would be to have a compute gallery in each region. However if two compute galleries are used it is not immediately clear to me how we replicate images between them, once a machine is genaralised and committed to an image gallery it is deleted.
How can we replicate between compute galleries?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 7a02ac6f-a170-0558-faac-98f669d0e030
* Version Independent ID: 7a02ac6f-a170-0558-faac-98f669d0e030
* Content: [Multiregion BCDR for Azure Virtual Desktop - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-multi-region-bcdr#compute)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-multi-region-bcdr.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/wvd/azure-virtual-desktop-multi-region-bcdr.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @igorpag
* Microsoft Alias: **igorpag**",1,image gallery regional bcdr i d like clarification on availability of compute galleries in the event of regional failure according to this page you should store images in the azure compute gallery and configure multiple image replicas in both the primary and the secondary locations however in this article it states the azure compute gallery service is not a global resource for disaster recovery scenarios it is a best practice is to have at least two galleries in different regions it seems the solution say for a ukw uks deployment would be to have a compute gallery in each region however if two compute galleries are used it is not immediately clear to me how we replicate images between them once a machine is genaralised and committed to an image gallery it is deleted how can we replicate between compute galleries document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id faac version independent id faac content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login igorpag microsoft alias igorpag ,1
9637,24945679196.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-31 23:47:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"VPN speed is listed as 10Gbps, but should read 1Gbps?",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
In the details for VPN speed, the page lists the speed as up to 10Gbps, but shouldn't it read 1Gbps?
Quote:
""VPN connection
A [VPN gateway](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/vpn-gateway/vpn-gateway-about-vpngateways) is a type of virtual network gateway that sends encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location. The encrypted traffic goes over the public Internet.
This architecture is suitable for hybrid applications where the traffic between on-premises hardware and the cloud is likely to be light, or you are willing to trade slightly extended latency for the flexibility and processing power of the cloud.
Benefits
Simple to configure.
Much higher bandwidth available; up to 10 Gbps depending on the VPN Gateway SKU.""
Best regards
Alf
---
#### Dokumentinformasjon
⚠ *Ikke rediger denne delen. Den kreves for koblingen docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub-problem.*
* ID: 59c72e16-a607-68cc-4d47-7e6f16b546c1
* Version Independent ID: 897309eb-6e9b-1f5c-714b-b12c91e9091d
* Content: [Connect an on-premises network to Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/nb-no/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/index.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/index.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"VPN speed is listed as 10Gbps, but should read 1Gbps? -
In the details for VPN speed, the page lists the speed as up to 10Gbps, but shouldn't it read 1Gbps?
Quote:
""VPN connection
A [VPN gateway](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/vpn-gateway/vpn-gateway-about-vpngateways) is a type of virtual network gateway that sends encrypted traffic between an Azure virtual network and an on-premises location. The encrypted traffic goes over the public Internet.
This architecture is suitable for hybrid applications where the traffic between on-premises hardware and the cloud is likely to be light, or you are willing to trade slightly extended latency for the flexibility and processing power of the cloud.
Benefits
Simple to configure.
Much higher bandwidth available; up to 10 Gbps depending on the VPN Gateway SKU.""
Best regards
Alf
---
#### Dokumentinformasjon
⚠ *Ikke rediger denne delen. Den kreves for koblingen docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub-problem.*
* ID: 59c72e16-a607-68cc-4d47-7e6f16b546c1
* Version Independent ID: 897309eb-6e9b-1f5c-714b-b12c91e9091d
* Content: [Connect an on-premises network to Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/nb-no/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/index.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/index.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,vpn speed is listed as but should read in the details for vpn speed the page lists the speed as up to but shouldn t it read quote vpn connection a is a type of virtual network gateway that sends encrypted traffic between an azure virtual network and an on premises location the encrypted traffic goes over the public internet this architecture is suitable for hybrid applications where the traffic between on premises hardware and the cloud is likely to be light or you are willing to trade slightly extended latency for the flexibility and processing power of the cloud benefits simple to configure much higher bandwidth available up to gbps depending on the vpn gateway sku best regards alf dokumentinformasjon ⚠ ikke rediger denne delen den kreves for koblingen docs microsoft com ➟ github problem id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9004,23961846172.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-12 19:52:58,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,reopened,What about backend Database decomposition?,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"After applying the Strangler pattern and decomposing the monolith bounding context to microservices, it is still shown that they are still accessing the same database source. Please suggest what is the reason? Also, how to decompose database for individual domain microservice.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab3d720e-441b-16f6-a73d-d7a66f81fa32
* Version Independent ID: 8a923182-0020-db36-e896-0cf71d277c67
* Content: [Monoliths to microservices using domain-driven design - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/migrate-monolith)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/migrate-monolith.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/migrate-monolith.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @lavann
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"What about backend Database decomposition? - After applying the Strangler pattern and decomposing the monolith bounding context to microservices, it is still shown that they are still accessing the same database source. Please suggest what is the reason? Also, how to decompose database for individual domain microservice.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ab3d720e-441b-16f6-a73d-d7a66f81fa32
* Version Independent ID: 8a923182-0020-db36-e896-0cf71d277c67
* Content: [Monoliths to microservices using domain-driven design - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/migrate-monolith)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/migrate-monolith.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/migrate-monolith.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @lavann
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,what about backend database decomposition after applying the strangler pattern and decomposing the monolith bounding context to microservices it is still shown that they are still accessing the same database source please suggest what is the reason also how to decompose database for individual domain microservice document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login lavann microsoft alias pnp ,1
4086,10562103976.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-04 17:29:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AKS supports auto-scaling,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Both the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler and the Cluster Autoscaler are supported in AKS
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/cluster-autoscaler
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: adbd9d8a-e443-aeab-cdf1-1c9c8858746c
* Version Independent ID: 5a0980f5-b246-0865-6f06-aa875f87a5ce
* Content: [Criteria for choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"AKS supports auto-scaling - Both the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler and the Cluster Autoscaler are supported in AKS
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/cluster-autoscaler
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: adbd9d8a-e443-aeab-cdf1-1c9c8858746c
* Version Independent ID: 5a0980f5-b246-0865-6f06-aa875f87a5ce
* Content: [Criteria for choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-comparison.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,aks supports auto scaling both the horizontal pod autoscaler and the cluster autoscaler are supported in aks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id aeab version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
4607,11431180908.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-04 11:35:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Next Steps Links Broken,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-enhancement triaged,"All of the next steps links generate 401s. Please fix.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a058a401-d8c8-e58a-23c1-d35990e4ab6f
* Version Independent ID: 4acb1715-c7ab-9c60-a55f-ceb09c223755
* Content: [Back up on-premises applications and data to cloud - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises-applications#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises-applications.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises-applications.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Next Steps Links Broken - All of the next steps links generate 401s. Please fix.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a058a401-d8c8-e58a-23c1-d35990e4ab6f
* Version Independent ID: 4acb1715-c7ab-9c60-a55f-ceb09c223755
* Content: [Back up on-premises applications and data to cloud - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises-applications#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises-applications.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/backup-archive-on-premises-applications.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,next steps links broken all of the next steps links generate please fix document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
8108,20968779721.0,IssuesEvent,2022-03-28 09:23:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Error regarding blob name,cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"
[I want to read a csv file located in the blob storage. However, I am getting error that specified blob does not exist. I am confused what should be the blob name. I gave LOCALFILENAME as my csv file name seen in the blob container]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 647ed505-3e6e-3db7-63ee-025edf6e63f4
* Version Independent ID: d910ba75-6c86-6172-64be-e45ba2bf5a3d
* Content: [Explore data in Azure Blob storage with pandas - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-science-process/explore-data-blob)
* Content Source: [docs/data-science-process/explore-data-blob.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-science-process/explore-data-blob.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @marktab
* Microsoft Alias: **tdsp**",1.0,"Error regarding blob name -
[I want to read a csv file located in the blob storage. However, I am getting error that specified blob does not exist. I am confused what should be the blob name. I gave LOCALFILENAME as my csv file name seen in the blob container]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 647ed505-3e6e-3db7-63ee-025edf6e63f4
* Version Independent ID: d910ba75-6c86-6172-64be-e45ba2bf5a3d
* Content: [Explore data in Azure Blob storage with pandas - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-science-process/explore-data-blob)
* Content Source: [docs/data-science-process/explore-data-blob.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-science-process/explore-data-blob.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @marktab
* Microsoft Alias: **tdsp**",1,error regarding blob name document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login marktab microsoft alias tdsp ,1
5755,13106652565.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-04 14:09:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Repo not found when deploying,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug example-scenario/subsvc triaged,"I am trying to deploy this Dev/Test for SAP template but it gives this error when Review+Create: Can you please confirm if the github repo link is still valid. Thanks!
""message"": ""Multiple error occurred: BadRequest,BadRequest. Please see details."",
""details"": [
{
""code"": ""InvalidContentLink"",
""message"": ""Unable to download deployment content from 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/master/sap-2-tier-marketplace-image-md//shared/nic-config.json'. The tracking Id is '53709288-5c29-4725-b5fc-5c56051d801e'. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-deploy for usage details.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8307bb37-3a4f-0073-c495-b2aaa4cc8797
* Version Independent ID: 60702144-7610-fda2-a68d-f9f05aff2921
* Content: [Development and test environments for SAP workloads on Azure - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @AndrewDibbins
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Repo not found when deploying - I am trying to deploy this Dev/Test for SAP template but it gives this error when Review+Create: Can you please confirm if the github repo link is still valid. Thanks!
""message"": ""Multiple error occurred: BadRequest,BadRequest. Please see details."",
""details"": [
{
""code"": ""InvalidContentLink"",
""message"": ""Unable to download deployment content from 'https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Azure/azure-quickstart-templates/master/sap-2-tier-marketplace-image-md//shared/nic-config.json'. The tracking Id is '53709288-5c29-4725-b5fc-5c56051d801e'. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-deploy for usage details.""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8307bb37-3a4f-0073-c495-b2aaa4cc8797
* Version Independent ID: 60702144-7610-fda2-a68d-f9f05aff2921
* Content: [Development and test environments for SAP workloads on Azure - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/apps/sap-dev-test.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @AndrewDibbins
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,repo not found when deploying i am trying to deploy this dev test for sap template but it gives this error when review create can you please confirm if the github repo link is still valid thanks message multiple error occurred badrequest badrequest please see details details code invalidcontentlink message unable to download deployment content from the tracking id is please see for usage details document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login andrewdibbins microsoft alias pnp ,1
11351,30231252191.0,IssuesEvent,2023-07-06 07:06:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Unusable icons,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
azure icons are pretty unusable : why not make them available in easier to use formats such as ppt ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Unusable icons -
[Enter feedback here]
azure icons are pretty unusable : why not make them available in easier to use formats such as ppt ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,unusable icons azure icons are pretty unusable why not make them available in easier to use formats such as ppt document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
10082,26203634622.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-03 20:03:43,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Reccomendation on how to update a specific entity when the request is not idempotent,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 best-practice/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hi,
I'm looking at the table from [Define API operations in terms of HTTP methods](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design#define-api-operations-in-terms-of-http-methods):
The example suggests using `PUT /customers/1` to update a specific customer.
The documentation also says that PUT requests should be idempotent:
If I update a specific customer I should use `PUT /customers/1`, but if that customer contains a timestamp (based on the time the request was sent) then the request won't be a valid PUT request because it's not idempotent.
```
public class Customer
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public DateTime LastUpdated { get; set; }
...
}
```
How should I define my API operation to update a specific customer when the request is not idempotent?
In this case, should I be updating a specific customer with `POST /customers/1` instead?
Thanks for your help!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad651d6a-f8d8-2050-e7a7-adbae7326112
* Version Independent ID: 4fddd724-cabd-8623-7692-857088c1dccb
* Content: [Web API design best practices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design#define-api-operations-in-terms-of-http-methods)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Reccomendation on how to update a specific entity when the request is not idempotent -
[Enter feedback here]
Hi,
I'm looking at the table from [Define API operations in terms of HTTP methods](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design#define-api-operations-in-terms-of-http-methods):
The example suggests using `PUT /customers/1` to update a specific customer.
The documentation also says that PUT requests should be idempotent:
If I update a specific customer I should use `PUT /customers/1`, but if that customer contains a timestamp (based on the time the request was sent) then the request won't be a valid PUT request because it's not idempotent.
```
public class Customer
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public DateTime LastUpdated { get; set; }
...
}
```
How should I define my API operation to update a specific customer when the request is not idempotent?
In this case, should I be updating a specific customer with `POST /customers/1` instead?
Thanks for your help!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ad651d6a-f8d8-2050-e7a7-adbae7326112
* Version Independent ID: 4fddd724-cabd-8623-7692-857088c1dccb
* Content: [Web API design best practices - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/api-design#define-api-operations-in-terms-of-http-methods)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/api-design.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/best-practices/api-design.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,reccomendation on how to update a specific entity when the request is not idempotent hi i m looking at the table from the example suggests using put customers to update a specific customer the documentation also says that put requests should be idempotent if i update a specific customer i should use put customers but if that customer contains a timestamp based on the time the request was sent then the request won t be a valid put request because it s not idempotent public class customer public int id get set public datetime lastupdated get set how should i define my api operation to update a specific customer when the request is not idempotent in this case should i be updating a specific customer with post customers instead thanks for your help document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id cabd content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
10674,27256061079.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-22 11:36:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Can't automatically generate code?,assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"> However, one disadvantage is that CQRS code can't automatically be generated from a database schema using scaffolding mechanisms such as O/RM tools.
This would be more correct to say ""CQRS and Entity Framework are not comparable, but CQRS can be implemented atop the things that Entity framework generates"". It's also possible (and preferred) to use code generation to generate entities and some related CQRS code from only a database table with proper keys defined and skip EF entirely.
_(Sorry for the multiple edits, was reaching for the apostrophe and kept hitting `Enter`)_
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [CQRS pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Can't automatically generate code? - > However, one disadvantage is that CQRS code can't automatically be generated from a database schema using scaffolding mechanisms such as O/RM tools.
This would be more correct to say ""CQRS and Entity Framework are not comparable, but CQRS can be implemented atop the things that Entity framework generates"". It's also possible (and preferred) to use code generation to generate entities and some related CQRS code from only a database table with proper keys defined and skip EF entirely.
_(Sorry for the multiple edits, was reaching for the apostrophe and kept hitting `Enter`)_
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0c0ec92e-c237-f3a6-1835-f2078486dcb3
* Version Independent ID: f597c9a2-f18f-3722-57f9-acd535472b0b
* Content: [CQRS pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/cqrs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/cqrs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,can t automatically generate code however one disadvantage is that cqrs code can t automatically be generated from a database schema using scaffolding mechanisms such as o rm tools this would be more correct to say cqrs and entity framework are not comparable but cqrs can be implemented atop the things that entity framework generates it s also possible and preferred to use code generation to generate entities and some related cqrs code from only a database table with proper keys defined and skip ef entirely sorry for the multiple edits was reaching for the apostrophe and kept hitting enter document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
7058,16413510797.0,IssuesEvent,2021-05-19 01:17:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Azure Synapse Analytics is mislabeled. This should be Azure Synapse DW.,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"I'm not sure the diagram shown on the page reflects the actual product features and capabilities correctly. For a start, Azure Synapse Analytics seems to be in the ""model and serve"" zone, but I think that should be shown as Azure Synapse DW (not Analytics). The diagram also shows Data Bricks and Data Factory which are now part of Azure Analytics. So That seems to be wrong also. Why would you have DB and DF if you have Azure Synapse Analytics. My guess is that the article is from last year before the Azure Synapse branding and features were fully defined.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2ac60d9e-b851-afa6-beeb-74cdaa2a9146
* Version Independent ID: e300615f-1b32-df63-bc89-54b3b17dced5
* Content: [Modern Data Warehouse Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Azure Synapse Analytics is mislabeled. This should be Azure Synapse DW. - I'm not sure the diagram shown on the page reflects the actual product features and capabilities correctly. For a start, Azure Synapse Analytics seems to be in the ""model and serve"" zone, but I think that should be shown as Azure Synapse DW (not Analytics). The diagram also shows Data Bricks and Data Factory which are now part of Azure Analytics. So That seems to be wrong also. Why would you have DB and DF if you have Azure Synapse Analytics. My guess is that the article is from last year before the Azure Synapse branding and features were fully defined.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2ac60d9e-b851-afa6-beeb-74cdaa2a9146
* Version Independent ID: e300615f-1b32-df63-bc89-54b3b17dced5
* Content: [Modern Data Warehouse Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/modern-data-warehouse.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,azure synapse analytics is mislabeled this should be azure synapse dw i m not sure the diagram shown on the page reflects the actual product features and capabilities correctly for a start azure synapse analytics seems to be in the model and serve zone but i think that should be shown as azure synapse dw not analytics the diagram also shows data bricks and data factory which are now part of azure analytics so that seems to be wrong also why would you have db and df if you have azure synapse analytics my guess is that the article is from last year before the azure synapse branding and features were fully defined document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id beeb version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11143,28126000591.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-31 17:46:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,ETL Versus ELT for Power BI Datamarts,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"Datamart should be positionned in this article : is Datamart an ETL or an ELT or both ? CAN WE SAY that the transformation happens in the target store that is Azure db ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fcb3c6d7-aa3e-9a76-181b-d0963ac685b9
* Version Independent ID: da9c883b-93bf-8864-015a-a7b10a6fcb5f
* Content: [Extract, transform, and load (ETL) - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/etl)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/etl.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/relational-data/etl.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @raunakjhawar
* Microsoft Alias: **rajhawar**",1.0,"ETL Versus ELT for Power BI Datamarts - Datamart should be positionned in this article : is Datamart an ETL or an ELT or both ? CAN WE SAY that the transformation happens in the target store that is Azure db ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fcb3c6d7-aa3e-9a76-181b-d0963ac685b9
* Version Independent ID: da9c883b-93bf-8864-015a-a7b10a6fcb5f
* Content: [Extract, transform, and load (ETL) - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/relational-data/etl)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/relational-data/etl.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/data-guide/relational-data/etl.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @raunakjhawar
* Microsoft Alias: **rajhawar**",1,etl versus elt for power bi datamarts datamart should be positionned in this article is datamart an etl or an elt or both can we say that the transformation happens in the target store that is azure db document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login raunakjhawar microsoft alias rajhawar ,1
9597,24876727559.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-27 19:48:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Front Door vs App Gateway,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"My understanding is that Front Door has all the load-balancing capabilities of App Gateway. Why couldn't you just use Front Door to do all the work and remove the need for a local app gateway?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4d54fc4b-e066-f455-c6c4-34448a61bb50
* Version Independent ID: 3736237c-ae6a-18b8-aab1-d9c9ad031231
* Content: [Multitenant SaaS on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/example-scenario/multi-saas/multitenant-saas)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/multi-saas/multitenant-saas.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/multi-saas/multitenant-saas.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Front Door vs App Gateway - My understanding is that Front Door has all the load-balancing capabilities of App Gateway. Why couldn't you just use Front Door to do all the work and remove the need for a local app gateway?
---
#### Document details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 4d54fc4b-e066-f455-c6c4-34448a61bb50
* Version Independent ID: 3736237c-ae6a-18b8-aab1-d9c9ad031231
* Content: [Multitenant SaaS on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-gb/azure/architecture/example-scenario/multi-saas/multitenant-saas)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/multi-saas/multitenant-saas.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/multi-saas/multitenant-saas.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,front door vs app gateway my understanding is that front door has all the load balancing capabilities of app gateway why couldn t you just use front door to do all the work and remove the need for a local app gateway document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10373,26854981787.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-03 13:59:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"typo ""to reduced""",architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"in this sentence *Use Azure SQL Database to reduced management overhead.*
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @josevarela
* Microsoft Alias: **josev**",2.0,"typo ""to reduced"" - in this sentence *Use Azure SQL Database to reduced management overhead.*
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @josevarela
* Microsoft Alias: **josev**",1,typo to reduced in this sentence use azure sql database to reduced management overhead document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login josevarela microsoft alias josev ,1
10136,26382691274.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-12 09:53:25,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Graphic icon is mislabeled,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"The SVG, the screen in step 5 stays ""Admin Access"" and should be ""User Access""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS and Azure DevOps - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Graphic icon is mislabeled - The SVG, the screen in step 5 stays ""Admin Access"" and should be ""User Access""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8f6e327d-b280-a35c-2588-87a19ac2a4ba
* Version Independent ID: fa9b0713-771f-4792-979a-2f7a4f4445a2
* Content: [Microservices with AKS and Azure DevOps - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/microservices-with-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,graphic icon is mislabeled the svg the screen in step stays admin access and should be user access document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
10290,26671665199.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-26 10:49:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Conflicting statement on patching AKS nodes,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
[As per current document security pacthes doesnt get automaticlly applied to nodes by default , in similar document its mentioned that each evening linux node in AKS get sec pacthes vai distro security update and that behaviour is automatically configured as nodes deployed to AKS cluster.
Refernce doc links: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/concepts-security#linux-nodes]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Conflicting statement on patching AKS nodes -
[As per current document security pacthes doesnt get automaticlly applied to nodes by default , in similar document its mentioned that each evening linux node in AKS get sec pacthes vai distro security update and that behaviour is automatically configured as nodes deployed to AKS cluster.
Refernce doc links: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/aks/concepts-security#linux-nodes]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,conflicting statement on patching aks nodes as per current document security pacthes doesnt get automaticlly applied to nodes by default in similar document its mentioned that each evening linux node in aks get sec pacthes vai distro security update and that behaviour is automatically configured as nodes deployed to aks cluster refernce doc links document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login rishabhsaha microsoft alias pnp ,1
9112,24052380111.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 13:53:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Stream analytics can also be used within Synapse,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Stream analytics can also be used within Synapse
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/synapse-analytics/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-integrate-azure-stream-analytics
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 957618b3-8d25-49c4-950c-0c044d68f443
* Version Independent ID: 2ab67665-066b-fb14-9763-a12693b19bec
* Content: [Choosing a stream processing technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Stream analytics can also be used within Synapse - Stream analytics can also be used within Synapse
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/synapse-analytics/sql-data-warehouse/sql-data-warehouse-integrate-azure-stream-analytics
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 957618b3-8d25-49c4-950c-0c044d68f443
* Version Independent ID: 2ab67665-066b-fb14-9763-a12693b19bec
* Content: [Choosing a stream processing technology - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing)
* Content Source: [docs/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/data-guide/technology-choices/stream-processing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @ZoinerTejada
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,stream analytics can also be used within synapse stream analytics can also be used within synapse document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login zoinertejada microsoft alias pnp ,1
10684,27297098117.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-23 21:22:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Please clarify ""bi-weekly""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"I just recently found out that ""bi-weekly"" means both every other week and twice a week - so should we update the node OS images every other week or twice a week?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/on-biweekly-and-bimonthly
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/biweekly
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 Operations Guide - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Please clarify ""bi-weekly"" - I just recently found out that ""bi-weekly"" means both every other week and twice a week - so should we update the node OS images every other week or twice a week?
https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/on-biweekly-and-bimonthly
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/biweekly
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 Operations Guide - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,please clarify bi weekly i just recently found out that bi weekly means both every other week and twice a week so should we update the node os images every other week or twice a week document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login rishabhsaha microsoft alias pnp ,1
9195,24195263874.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-23 22:34:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Design pattern link ,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Design pattern link is not correctly map it is takingus back to the same page ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Design pattern link -
[Enter feedback here]
Design pattern link is not correctly map it is takingus back to the same page ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: cade8ea3-b02f-6c92-b7b1-8f37a5c9d701
* Version Independent ID: c0bde50c-5e28-5ff2-1507-5a8711ae3022
* Content: [Azure Application Architecture Guide - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,design pattern link design pattern link is not correctly map it is takingus back to the same page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
4611,11434841148.0,IssuesEvent,2020-02-04 18:10:50,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Next Steps Links Broken,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp doc-bug triaged,"404
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 018a7aef-3117-17c5-8693-7455cefa54d3
* Version Independent ID: a6c4e7a0-3cfa-1c4c-bc48-6281c870b035
* Content: [Enterprise-scale disaster recovery - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-enterprise-scale-dr#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-enterprise-scale-dr.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-enterprise-scale-dr.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Next Steps Links Broken - 404
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 018a7aef-3117-17c5-8693-7455cefa54d3
* Version Independent ID: a6c4e7a0-3cfa-1c4c-bc48-6281c870b035
* Content: [Enterprise-scale disaster recovery - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-enterprise-scale-dr#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-enterprise-scale-dr.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/disaster-recovery-enterprise-scale-dr.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,next steps links broken document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5004,11942382159.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 20:12:00,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Incorrect Hyperlink,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-design-principles/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"'Security Operations' appears to be linking to the 'Identity and access management' page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 55000863-6c61-319b-7d0d-5366c403e5e2
* Version Independent ID: 7bb9bb22-f939-6176-236f-79399b6ab2b4
* Content: [Overview of the security pillar](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/overview#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Incorrect Hyperlink - 'Security Operations' appears to be linking to the 'Identity and access management' page.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 55000863-6c61-319b-7d0d-5366c403e5e2
* Version Independent ID: 7bb9bb22-f939-6176-236f-79399b6ab2b4
* Content: [Overview of the security pillar](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/framework/security/overview#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/framework/security/overview.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/framework/security/overview.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @david-stanford
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,incorrect hyperlink security operations appears to be linking to the identity and access management page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login david stanford microsoft alias pnp ,1
9718,25104567025.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:46:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Title change,docs-experience triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
Title needs to change to Azure NVA Firewalls
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2c9f2509-a3f9-d8bf-e0bf-a9c970d5a423
* Version Independent ID: 62cbc02f-3a6a-2966-380d-af66737f8711
* Content: [Azure Firewall architecture overview - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/firewalls/)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/firewalls/index.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/firewalls/index.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @RZomerman
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Title change -
[Enter feedback here]
Title needs to change to Azure NVA Firewalls
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2c9f2509-a3f9-d8bf-e0bf-a9c970d5a423
* Version Independent ID: 62cbc02f-3a6a-2966-380d-af66737f8711
* Content: [Azure Firewall architecture overview - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/firewalls/)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/firewalls/index.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/firewalls/index.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @RZomerman
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,title change title needs to change to azure nva firewalls document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login rzomerman microsoft alias pnp ,1
9133,24059749271.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 20:50:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,How can we use privateendpoint web app as backend of App Gateway + Firewall,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri1,"
Hi MS,
I wish to use your scenario ""Application Gateway before Firewall"".
This will help us achieve requirement of TLS/IDPS/DDos by using Az firewall after the App Gateway.
however instead of using the IaaS VM i wish to use my private end pointed Web apps/Function Apps.
Reason is that all my PaaS resources (WebApp,FunctionApp, KV, Storage etc) are in my internal network with no public endpoint exposed.
But I cannot find any article for it . When I set it up myself I do 404 error on Public IP of my App Gateway.
So to recap my setup is :
PublicIP -> AppGatewayv2 & WAF -> Subnet -> Az Firewall -> subnet -> Web App with Private Endpoint
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall, App Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway#application-gateway-before-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1.0,"How can we use privateendpoint web app as backend of App Gateway + Firewall -
Hi MS,
I wish to use your scenario ""Application Gateway before Firewall"".
This will help us achieve requirement of TLS/IDPS/DDos by using Az firewall after the App Gateway.
however instead of using the IaaS VM i wish to use my private end pointed Web apps/Function Apps.
Reason is that all my PaaS resources (WebApp,FunctionApp, KV, Storage etc) are in my internal network with no public endpoint exposed.
But I cannot find any article for it . When I set it up myself I do 404 error on Public IP of my App Gateway.
So to recap my setup is :
PublicIP -> AppGatewayv2 & WAF -> Subnet -> Az Firewall -> subnet -> Web App with Private Endpoint
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: bb4e04dc-fc84-e958-89a8-e144ed5564b0
* Version Independent ID: 795ef2fa-a126-8ded-d75d-3eb8811f4a23
* Content: [Firewall, App Gateway for virtual networks - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway#application-gateway-before-firewall)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/gateway/firewall-application-gateway.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @erjosito
* Microsoft Alias: **jomore**",1,how can we use privateendpoint web app as backend of app gateway firewall hi ms i wish to use your scenario application gateway before firewall this will help us achieve requirement of tls idps ddos by using az firewall after the app gateway however instead of using the iaas vm i wish to use my private end pointed web apps function apps reason is that all my paas resources webapp functionapp kv storage etc are in my internal network with no public endpoint exposed but i cannot find any article for it when i set it up myself i do error on public ip of my app gateway so to recap my setup is publicip waf subnet az firewall subnet web app with private endpoint document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login erjosito microsoft alias jomore ,1
8112,20973644694.0,IssuesEvent,2022-03-28 13:34:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Page not translated to chinese,assigned-to-author loc triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 anti-pattern/subsvc,"
Hi, page not translated to chinese
---
#### 文档详细信息
⚠ *请勿编辑此部分。 docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub 问题链接必须具有此部分。*
* ID: a6710f29-66f3-f73c-6a90-6025ce6a5bd3
* Version Independent ID: a6710f29-66f3-f73c-6a90-6025ce6a5bd3
* Content: [Noisy Neighbor antipattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/azure/architecture/antipatterns/noisy-neighbor/noisy-neighbor)
* Content Source: [docs/antipatterns/noisy-neighbor/noisy-neighbor.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/antipatterns/noisy-neighbor/noisy-neighbor.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **anti-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @johndowns
* Microsoft Alias: **jodowns**",1.0,"Page not translated to chinese -
Hi, page not translated to chinese
---
#### 文档详细信息
⚠ *请勿编辑此部分。 docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub 问题链接必须具有此部分。*
* ID: a6710f29-66f3-f73c-6a90-6025ce6a5bd3
* Version Independent ID: a6710f29-66f3-f73c-6a90-6025ce6a5bd3
* Content: [Noisy Neighbor antipattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/zh-cn/azure/architecture/antipatterns/noisy-neighbor/noisy-neighbor)
* Content Source: [docs/antipatterns/noisy-neighbor/noisy-neighbor.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/antipatterns/noisy-neighbor/noisy-neighbor.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **anti-pattern**
* GitHub Login: @johndowns
* Microsoft Alias: **jodowns**",1,page not translated to chinese hi page not translated to chinese 文档详细信息 ⚠ 请勿编辑此部分。 docs microsoft com ➟ github 问题链接必须具有此部分。 id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service anti pattern github login johndowns microsoft alias jodowns ,1
5051,11995561049.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-08 15:23:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Cost estimation needed,Pri2 architecture-center/svc cxp solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"Hello,
Can I have an estimation about pricing of this scenario?
Thanks,
Edi
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 73dc00bc-c571-72c0-c3de-8e1a35b9e27a
* Version Independent ID: 424eb559-47a7-bcc5-e567-e428e59c11cb
* Content: [E-commerce website running in secured App Service Environment - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Cost estimation needed - Hello,
Can I have an estimation about pricing of this scenario?
Thanks,
Edi
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 73dc00bc-c571-72c0-c3de-8e1a35b9e27a
* Version Independent ID: 424eb559-47a7-bcc5-e567-e428e59c11cb
* Content: [E-commerce website running in secured App Service Environment - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,cost estimation needed hello can i have an estimation about pricing of this scenario thanks edi document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5234,12244644663.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-05 11:32:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,AWS Macie comparison,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc cxp triaged,"what is the comparative AWS Macie service in Azure?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"AWS Macie comparison - what is the comparative AWS Macie service in Azure?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 30d02f16-9621-d204-4132-8ce8db79b0af
* Version Independent ID: 65b4385b-79f0-d842-d4a1-5d013615f9b1
* Content: [AWS to Azure services comparison - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/aws-professional/services)
* Content Source: [docs/aws-professional/services.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/aws-professional/services.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,aws macie comparison what is the comparative aws macie service in azure document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9748,25141173245.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-09 23:19:01,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio link not to picture shown ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"
The Visio link is not for the architecture shown
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9b605d93-ab34-f8f0-2c64-d38fc5b0ab51
* Version Independent ID: 6e418fbb-e9f8-fa03-ef0e-ab6940ab62ce
* Content: [Create an AD DS resource forest - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Visio link not to picture shown -
The Visio link is not for the architecture shown
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9b605d93-ab34-f8f0-2c64-d38fc5b0ab51
* Version Independent ID: 6e418fbb-e9f8-fa03-ef0e-ab6940ab62ce
* Content: [Create an AD DS resource forest - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-forest.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,visio link not to picture shown the visio link is not for the architecture shown document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
9719,25104624439.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:48:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add Azure NetApp Files to diagram,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Since Azure NetApp Files is a valid solution for this architecture, suggesting the following two changes:
Change
- Azure Files Premium or an equivalent network-attached storage (NAS) system stores media files like product images. Magento needs a Kubernetes-compatible file system that can mount a volume in ReadWriteMany mode, like Azure Files Premium or Azure NetApp Files.
to:
- [Azure Files Premium](https://azure.microsoft.com/services/storage/files/), [Azure NetApp Files](https://azure.microsoft.com/services/netapp/) or an equivalent network-attached storage (NAS) system stores media files like product images. Magento needs a Kubernetes-compatible file system that can mount a volume in ReadWriteMany mode, like Azure Files Premium or Azure NetApp Files.
Further, please incorporate Azure NetApp Files into the diagram as a similar valid option as Azure Files Premium.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2edf62c9-d5c7-b4d0-99e7-f271ef0b629e
* Version Independent ID: d9ff7f72-3fbb-3bc6-e787-60b1ccecb698
* Content: [Magento e-commerce platform in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Add Azure NetApp Files to diagram - Since Azure NetApp Files is a valid solution for this architecture, suggesting the following two changes:
Change
- Azure Files Premium or an equivalent network-attached storage (NAS) system stores media files like product images. Magento needs a Kubernetes-compatible file system that can mount a volume in ReadWriteMany mode, like Azure Files Premium or Azure NetApp Files.
to:
- [Azure Files Premium](https://azure.microsoft.com/services/storage/files/), [Azure NetApp Files](https://azure.microsoft.com/services/netapp/) or an equivalent network-attached storage (NAS) system stores media files like product images. Magento needs a Kubernetes-compatible file system that can mount a volume in ReadWriteMany mode, like Azure Files Premium or Azure NetApp Files.
Further, please incorporate Azure NetApp Files into the diagram as a similar valid option as Azure Files Premium.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2edf62c9-d5c7-b4d0-99e7-f271ef0b629e
* Version Independent ID: d9ff7f72-3fbb-3bc6-e787-60b1ccecb698
* Content: [Magento e-commerce platform in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,add azure netapp files to diagram since azure netapp files is a valid solution for this architecture suggesting the following two changes change azure files premium or an equivalent network attached storage nas system stores media files like product images magento needs a kubernetes compatible file system that can mount a volume in readwritemany mode like azure files premium or azure netapp files to or an equivalent network attached storage nas system stores media files like product images magento needs a kubernetes compatible file system that can mount a volume in readwritemany mode like azure files premium or azure netapp files further please incorporate azure netapp files into the diagram as a similar valid option as azure files premium document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10964,27618288532.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-09 21:16:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Add Azure Container Apps to decision tree,doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3,"Although Container Apps is in Public Preview and likely should be noted as such, can it be added to the decision tree to give additional light to where it falls here?",1.0,"Add Azure Container Apps to decision tree - Although Container Apps is in Public Preview and likely should be noted as such, can it be added to the decision tree to give additional light to where it falls here?",1,add azure container apps to decision tree although container apps is in public preview and likely should be noted as such can it be added to the decision tree to give additional light to where it falls here ,1
10757,27404497343.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-01 05:08:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Webserver missing in ""Real-time asset tracking and management"" architecture?",cxp triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central
The architecture ""real time asset tracking"" shows an arrow from SQL Database to Azure API Management to the Browser.
My question is where is the webserver that is hosting the API and querying the data for API Requests from the database? Is API Management capable of that?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f4cc2d26-95f1-a809-8d21-251fa973b084
* Version Independent ID: d452c096-bbea-6b65-36d1-cd56337493ca
* Content: [Real-time asset tracking and management using IoT Central - Azure Solution Ideas](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @ypriyay
* Microsoft Alias: **priyay**",1.0,"Webserver missing in ""Real-time asset tracking and management"" architecture? - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central
The architecture ""real time asset tracking"" shows an arrow from SQL Database to Azure API Management to the Browser.
My question is where is the webserver that is hosting the API and querying the data for API Requests from the database? Is API Management capable of that?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f4cc2d26-95f1-a809-8d21-251fa973b084
* Version Independent ID: d452c096-bbea-6b65-36d1-cd56337493ca
* Content: [Real-time asset tracking and management using IoT Central - Azure Solution Ideas](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @ypriyay
* Microsoft Alias: **priyay**",1,webserver missing in real time asset tracking and management architecture the architecture real time asset tracking shows an arrow from sql database to azure api management to the browser my question is where is the webserver that is hosting the api and querying the data for api requests from the database is api management capable of that document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id bbea content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login ypriyay microsoft alias priyay ,1
10294,26674959699.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-26 13:34:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SAP Router for SAP Note Download - no longer applies,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"Hello,
Please check SAP note 3010412 - ""SAP Support Backbone - Configuration Overview, Responsibilities and Troubleshooting"".
SAP note download into SAP Netweaver ABAP has not required the SAP Router since January 2020.
Thanks
Darryl
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fdf95a78-b354-11c7-de36-2bc0787c930c
* Version Independent ID: fdf95a78-b354-11c7-de36-2bc0787c930c
* Content: [Inbound and outbound internet connections for SAP on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/sap/sap-internet-inbound-outbound)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/sap/sap-internet-inbound-outbound.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/sap/sap-internet-inbound-outbound.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @msftrobiro
* Microsoft Alias: **robiro**",1.0,"SAP Router for SAP Note Download - no longer applies - Hello,
Please check SAP note 3010412 - ""SAP Support Backbone - Configuration Overview, Responsibilities and Troubleshooting"".
SAP note download into SAP Netweaver ABAP has not required the SAP Router since January 2020.
Thanks
Darryl
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fdf95a78-b354-11c7-de36-2bc0787c930c
* Version Independent ID: fdf95a78-b354-11c7-de36-2bc0787c930c
* Content: [Inbound and outbound internet connections for SAP on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/sap/sap-internet-inbound-outbound)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/sap/sap-internet-inbound-outbound.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/sap/sap-internet-inbound-outbound.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @msftrobiro
* Microsoft Alias: **robiro**",1,sap router for sap note download no longer applies hello please check sap note sap support backbone configuration overview responsibilities and troubleshooting sap note download into sap netweaver abap has not required the sap router since january thanks darryl document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login msftrobiro microsoft alias robiro ,1
7670,18797093045.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-09 00:10:35,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Use full service name for Azure NetApp Files,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc,"Geert van Teylingen (ANF PM) here. Can you rename 'NetApp' to the actual full service name 'Azure NetApp Files' in this sentence:
Data services use a combination of high-performance storage on Ultra or Premium solid-state disks (SSDs), file storage on **Azure NetApp Files** or Azure Files, and standard blob, archive, and backup storage that can be locally redundant or geo-redundant.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d151997c-4629-0167-3bb8-f14e35c119dc
* Version Independent ID: 2a7f8f92-e594-c6c1-07ce-a02d4d47af24
* Content: [Refactor IBM z/OS Coupling Facility - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/zos/refactor-zos-coupling-facility)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/zos/refactor-zos-coupling-facility.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/zos/refactor-zos-coupling-facility.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Use full service name for Azure NetApp Files - Geert van Teylingen (ANF PM) here. Can you rename 'NetApp' to the actual full service name 'Azure NetApp Files' in this sentence:
Data services use a combination of high-performance storage on Ultra or Premium solid-state disks (SSDs), file storage on **Azure NetApp Files** or Azure Files, and standard blob, archive, and backup storage that can be locally redundant or geo-redundant.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: d151997c-4629-0167-3bb8-f14e35c119dc
* Version Independent ID: 2a7f8f92-e594-c6c1-07ce-a02d4d47af24
* Content: [Refactor IBM z/OS Coupling Facility - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/zos/refactor-zos-coupling-facility)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/zos/refactor-zos-coupling-facility.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/zos/refactor-zos-coupling-facility.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,use full service name for azure netapp files geert van teylingen anf pm here can you rename netapp to the actual full service name azure netapp files in this sentence data services use a combination of high performance storage on ultra or premium solid state disks ssds file storage on azure netapp files or azure files and standard blob archive and backup storage that can be locally redundant or geo redundant document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
3585,9855107272.0,IssuesEvent,2019-06-19 18:32:23,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Tags are not exactly ""alphanumeric"" limited",architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author cloud-fundamentals/subsvc doc-enhancement triaged,"It may be difficult to confirm without involving localization, but can we change at least the tag naming restrictions from ""alphanumeric"" to ""Unicode"" or something else more appropriate? I have tested that Japanese characters, even fairly unusual ones that we previously saw didn't count as ""words"" for the RG naming conventions, work fine in tags.
I'm pretty sure that it's just the (single-byte) versions of the specifically listed characters that are prohibited, and any other Unicode symbol I tried worked fine (♡🐶漢字かなカナ).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#naming-rules-and-restrictions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Tags are not exactly ""alphanumeric"" limited - It may be difficult to confirm without involving localization, but can we change at least the tag naming restrictions from ""alphanumeric"" to ""Unicode"" or something else more appropriate? I have tested that Japanese characters, even fairly unusual ones that we previously saw didn't count as ""words"" for the RG naming conventions, work fine in tags.
I'm pretty sure that it's just the (single-byte) versions of the specifically listed characters that are prohibited, and any other Unicode symbol I tried worked fine (♡🐶漢字かなカナ).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0e540bb6-9f72-0529-28ea-ae82bc869835
* Version Independent ID: 24e71392-985b-59fb-1552-46395b169612
* Content: [Naming conventions for Azure resources - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/naming-conventions#naming-rules-and-restrictions)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/naming-conventions.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,tags are not exactly alphanumeric limited it may be difficult to confirm without involving localization but can we change at least the tag naming restrictions from alphanumeric to unicode or something else more appropriate i have tested that japanese characters even fairly unusual ones that we previously saw didn t count as words for the rg naming conventions work fine in tags i m pretty sure that it s just the single byte versions of the specifically listed characters that are prohibited and any other unicode symbol i tried worked fine ♡🐶漢字かなカナ document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
4500,11234172766.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-09 04:06:12,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Mismatch between Content Page and Navigation Pane,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"The ""Pillars of Software Quality"" have some inconsistencies between the navigation pane (4 pillars) and the content pane (5 pillars). It appears that there are actually 6 uniquely named quality pillars.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 111d7b49-94b6-abd9-c21a-fb0bace59114
* Version Independent ID: 5d9aa212-cbb2-803c-2ea9-6da76c7a9394
* Content: [Pillars of software quality - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/pillars#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/pillars.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/pillars.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Mismatch between Content Page and Navigation Pane - The ""Pillars of Software Quality"" have some inconsistencies between the navigation pane (4 pillars) and the content pane (5 pillars). It appears that there are actually 6 uniquely named quality pillars.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 111d7b49-94b6-abd9-c21a-fb0bace59114
* Version Independent ID: 5d9aa212-cbb2-803c-2ea9-6da76c7a9394
* Content: [Pillars of software quality - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/pillars#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/pillars.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/pillars.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,mismatch between content page and navigation pane the pillars of software quality have some inconsistencies between the navigation pane pillars and the content pane pillars it appears that there are actually uniquely named quality pillars document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
4237,10758327583.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-31 14:48:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Security Best Practices questions - is it already secure as proposed or we need more security assets in place?,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"This components are already secure due to the fact of having HTTPS (SSL enforced) and AD authentication? or would it be convenient to add a subnet with NSG on the non visible to internet assets (resource group, SQL azure, etc...)? and would a App Gateway with WAF or Azure Frontdoor be convenient to add security?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Security Best Practices questions - is it already secure as proposed or we need more security assets in place? - This components are already secure due to the fact of having HTTPS (SSL enforced) and AD authentication? or would it be convenient to add a subnet with NSG on the non visible to internet assets (resource group, SQL azure, etc...)? and would a App Gateway with WAF or Azure Frontdoor be convenient to add security?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 84bcf722-abb3-69b8-8073-15ae4a6890de
* Version Independent ID: 7b2010c6-696d-de66-8e56-8ac5d3e54526
* Content: [Basic web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/basic-web-app.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,security best practices questions is it already secure as proposed or we need more security assets in place this components are already secure due to the fact of having https ssl enforced and ad authentication or would it be convenient to add a subnet with nsg on the non visible to internet assets resource group sql azure etc and would a app gateway with waf or azure frontdoor be convenient to add security document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
7685,18849438882.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-11 18:47:30,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,‘times’ --> 'the time',doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc best-practice/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
just one tiny thing:
should the 'times' in the following sentence be changed to 'time' since the noun 'time' is uncountable, right?
The application waits a short time before the first retry, and then exponentially increasing times between each subsequent retry.
(This sentence appears in 'Exponential back-off' and 'Incremental intervals' under ""Determining the appropriate intervals between retries""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 53ff3ea0-9b53-16bb-b81f-a12074ad75d0
* Version Independent ID: 4e37c8ba-cbb5-1e3d-6186-ccb2ed6553bd
* Content: [Retry general guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/transient-faults)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/transient-faults.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/transient-faults.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"‘times’ --> 'the time' -
[Enter feedback here]
just one tiny thing:
should the 'times' in the following sentence be changed to 'time' since the noun 'time' is uncountable, right?
The application waits a short time before the first retry, and then exponentially increasing times between each subsequent retry.
(This sentence appears in 'Exponential back-off' and 'Incremental intervals' under ""Determining the appropriate intervals between retries""
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 53ff3ea0-9b53-16bb-b81f-a12074ad75d0
* Version Independent ID: 4e37c8ba-cbb5-1e3d-6186-ccb2ed6553bd
* Content: [Retry general guidance - Best practices for cloud applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/best-practices/transient-faults)
* Content Source: [docs/best-practices/transient-faults.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/best-practices/transient-faults.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **best-practice**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,‘times’ the time just one tiny thing should the times in the following sentence be changed to time since the noun time is uncountable right the application waits a short time before the first retry and then exponentially increasing times between each subsequent retry this sentence appears in exponential back off and incremental intervals under determining the appropriate intervals between retries document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service best practice github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9182,24171801566.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-22 19:58:08,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Problem with shutdown statement - causing customer confusing and concern.,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Hi,
A customer raised an issue around shutting down an Azure hosted domain controllers.
They are worried about this statement:
Do not shut down a domain controller VM using Azure portal. Instead, shut down and restart from the guest operating system. Shutting down through the portal causes the VM to be deallocated, which resets both the VM-GenerationID and the invocationID of the Active Directory repository. This discards the AD DS relative identifier (RID) pool and marks the sysvol folder as nonauthoritative, and may require reconfiguration of the domain controller.
This leads to them not upgrading their Domain controller vms. I feel that this is a non-issue. Can this statement be updated to provide more clarity on the ramifications of deallocating a domain controller and if it truly does cause a problem?
Cheers, Niall
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Problem with shutdown statement - causing customer confusing and concern. - Hi,
A customer raised an issue around shutting down an Azure hosted domain controllers.
They are worried about this statement:
Do not shut down a domain controller VM using Azure portal. Instead, shut down and restart from the guest operating system. Shutting down through the portal causes the VM to be deallocated, which resets both the VM-GenerationID and the invocationID of the Active Directory repository. This discards the AD DS relative identifier (RID) pool and marks the sysvol folder as nonauthoritative, and may require reconfiguration of the domain controller.
This leads to them not upgrading their Domain controller vms. I feel that this is a non-issue. Can this statement be updated to provide more clarity on the ramifications of deallocating a domain controller and if it truly does cause a problem?
Cheers, Niall
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,problem with shutdown statement causing customer confusing and concern hi a customer raised an issue around shutting down an azure hosted domain controllers they are worried about this statement do not shut down a domain controller vm using azure portal instead shut down and restart from the guest operating system shutting down through the portal causes the vm to be deallocated which resets both the vm generationid and the invocationid of the active directory repository this discards the ad ds relative identifier rid pool and marks the sysvol folder as nonauthoritative and may require reconfiguration of the domain controller this leads to them not upgrading their domain controller vms i feel that this is a non issue can this statement be updated to provide more clarity on the ramifications of deallocating a domain controller and if it truly does cause a problem cheers niall document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9276,24329544864.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-30 18:00:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Claims identity schema,assigned-to-author triaged product-question architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"There is this list of identity schema on this page
> oid > http://schemas.microsoft.com/identity/claims/objectidentifier
tid > http://schemas.microsoft.com/identity/claims/tenantid
unique_name > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/name
upn > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/upn
Is it fine to replace with https as this causes codeql warnings?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a5d00031-82e8-a8ee-0a66-e9b84231e837
* Version Independent ID: 9a9da08f-83e2-c493-61af-c4b5316c6f8e
* Content: [Work with claim-based identities in multitenant applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/claims)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/claims.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/claims.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Claims identity schema - There is this list of identity schema on this page
> oid > http://schemas.microsoft.com/identity/claims/objectidentifier
tid > http://schemas.microsoft.com/identity/claims/tenantid
unique_name > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/name
upn > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/05/identity/claims/upn
Is it fine to replace with https as this causes codeql warnings?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a5d00031-82e8-a8ee-0a66-e9b84231e837
* Version Independent ID: 9a9da08f-83e2-c493-61af-c4b5316c6f8e
* Content: [Work with claim-based identities in multitenant applications - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/multitenant-identity/claims)
* Content Source: [docs/multitenant-identity/claims.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/multitenant-identity/claims.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,claims identity schema there is this list of identity schema on this page oid tid unique name upn is it fine to replace with https as this causes codeql warnings document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
6640,14973245485.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-28 00:37:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,icon issues,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"
All I emailed the the CNE team but never heard anything back maybe this will get a quicker response:
1) the icon for stretch db seems to be the old sql dw this is incorrect
Also note that the redis cached is likely mis-named (see attached)
2) there isn't currently an icon for Azure Synapse pipelines using the Azure Data Factory icon is confusing and misleading so we desperately need a synapse pipelines icon
3) there isn't an icon for the newly released Azure Purview service
4) there doesn't seem to be an ADLS gen2 storage icon this would be helpful
5) there is no azure databricks icon despite it being shown in the diagram
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"icon issues -
All I emailed the the CNE team but never heard anything back maybe this will get a quicker response:
1) the icon for stretch db seems to be the old sql dw this is incorrect
Also note that the redis cached is likely mis-named (see attached)
2) there isn't currently an icon for Azure Synapse pipelines using the Azure Data Factory icon is confusing and misleading so we desperately need a synapse pipelines icon
3) there isn't an icon for the newly released Azure Purview service
4) there doesn't seem to be an ADLS gen2 storage icon this would be helpful
5) there is no azure databricks icon despite it being shown in the diagram
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,icon issues all i emailed the the cne team but never heard anything back maybe this will get a quicker response the icon for stretch db seems to be the old sql dw this is incorrect also note that the redis cached is likely mis named see attached there isn t currently an icon for azure synapse pipelines using the azure data factory icon is confusing and misleading so we desperately need a synapse pipelines icon there isn t an icon for the newly released azure purview service there doesn t seem to be an adls storage icon this would be helpful there is no azure databricks icon despite it being shown in the diagram document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
8954,23848584536.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-06 15:49:25,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Minor typo in ""context and problem"" section",doc-bug assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc cloud-fundamentals/subsvc Pri2,"Hi,
I just wanted to make you aware of a minor typo (or editing mistake) in the ""context and problem"" section. In the last sentence of the first paragraph, it says: ""... and is likely to **accesses** storage and other services on behalf of the client.""
However, it should be ""... is likely to **access** storage ...""
Cheers
Christian
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 428e4625-191f-a050-ec58-60fd2dddff86
* Version Independent ID: 3a4e385e-5761-3633-1ddf-46e1878b420d
* Content: [Gatekeeper pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/gatekeeper?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/gatekeeper.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/gatekeeper.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Minor typo in ""context and problem"" section - Hi,
I just wanted to make you aware of a minor typo (or editing mistake) in the ""context and problem"" section. In the last sentence of the first paragraph, it says: ""... and is likely to **accesses** storage and other services on behalf of the client.""
However, it should be ""... is likely to **access** storage ...""
Cheers
Christian
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 428e4625-191f-a050-ec58-60fd2dddff86
* Version Independent ID: 3a4e385e-5761-3633-1ddf-46e1878b420d
* Content: [Gatekeeper pattern - Cloud Design Patterns](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/gatekeeper?source=docs)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/gatekeeper.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/patterns/gatekeeper.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-fundamentals**
* GitHub Login: @dragon119
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,minor typo in context and problem section hi i just wanted to make you aware of a minor typo or editing mistake in the context and problem section in the last sentence of the first paragraph it says and is likely to accesses storage and other services on behalf of the client however it should be is likely to access storage cheers christian document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud fundamentals github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5561,12701756504.0,IssuesEvent,2020-06-22 18:47:41,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,SignalR Service details,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"It would be great if you can include SingalR service architectural and implementation details.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 53ea26cb-1cc0-2616-d0b4-cd50f1194a75
* Version Independent ID: 01eb1d9d-060a-01a8-aa50-68e017b2db38
* Content: [Messaging - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/messaging#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/messaging.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/messaging.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"SignalR Service details - It would be great if you can include SingalR service architectural and implementation details.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 53ea26cb-1cc0-2616-d0b4-cd50f1194a75
* Version Independent ID: 01eb1d9d-060a-01a8-aa50-68e017b2db38
* Content: [Messaging - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/messaging#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/messaging.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/messaging.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,signalr service details it would be great if you can include singalr service architectural and implementation details document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10014,26009387993.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-20 23:10:14,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Wront mention of route server name,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
The route server subnet name is mentioned incorrectly as ""Route Server Subnet"". It should ""RouteServerSubnet"" without any spaces.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3058f85a-d0d1-bc2e-0801-25c5150319cd
* Version Independent ID: 3058f85a-d0d1-bc2e-0801-25c5150319cd
* Content: [Update route tables by using Azure Route Server - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/networking/manage-routing-azure-route-server)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/networking/manage-routing-azure-route-server.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/networking/manage-routing-azure-route-server.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @priyshar
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Wront mention of route server name -
[Enter feedback here]
The route server subnet name is mentioned incorrectly as ""Route Server Subnet"". It should ""RouteServerSubnet"" without any spaces.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 3058f85a-d0d1-bc2e-0801-25c5150319cd
* Version Independent ID: 3058f85a-d0d1-bc2e-0801-25c5150319cd
* Content: [Update route tables by using Azure Route Server - Azure Example Scenarios](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/networking/manage-routing-azure-route-server)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/networking/manage-routing-azure-route-server.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/example-scenario/networking/manage-routing-azure-route-server.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @priyshar
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,wront mention of route server name the route server subnet name is mentioned incorrectly as route server subnet it should routeserversubnet without any spaces document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login priyshar microsoft alias architectures ,1
8549,22837664875.0,IssuesEvent,2022-07-12 18:18:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Broken BeeGFS Link,doc-bug cxp triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"[Enter feedback here]
Unfortunately the BeeGFS is broken / false, it opening GlusterFS content
All the best
Marco
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a7cf67b7-8d94-d7a2-97ef-1387e252109c
* Version Independent ID: 0d3a72a7-6600-5682-6be1-6c333192bbd6
* Content: [High-performance computing (HPC) on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/topics/high-performance-computing)
* Content Source: [docs/topics/high-performance-computing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/topics/high-performance-computing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @SMBrook
* Microsoft Alias: **sibrook**",2.0,"Broken BeeGFS Link - [Enter feedback here]
Unfortunately the BeeGFS is broken / false, it opening GlusterFS content
All the best
Marco
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a7cf67b7-8d94-d7a2-97ef-1387e252109c
* Version Independent ID: 0d3a72a7-6600-5682-6be1-6c333192bbd6
* Content: [High-performance computing (HPC) on Azure - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/topics/high-performance-computing)
* Content Source: [docs/topics/high-performance-computing.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/topics/high-performance-computing.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @SMBrook
* Microsoft Alias: **sibrook**",1,broken beegfs link unfortunately the beegfs is broken false it opening glusterfs content all the best marco document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login smbrook microsoft alias sibrook ,1
5009,11943298395.0,IssuesEvent,2020-04-02 22:54:21,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Disk metrics are 0.0,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author product-question reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Seems like any disk metric has value of zero (0). Is this a known issue, or may it be related to using datastorage version 2 ?
The following gives no records:
SparkMetric_CL | where name_s contains ""filesystem"" | where value_d > 0
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Disk metrics are 0.0 - Seems like any disk metric has value of zero (0). Is this a known issue, or may it be related to using datastorage version 2 ?
The following gives no records:
SparkMetric_CL | where name_s contains ""filesystem"" | where value_d > 0
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 9f728cb2-b203-6b2f-4e3c-9d0e1be2516f
* Version Independent ID: 9ed58ead-f4d0-d9d0-01fe-82b11be235a7
* Content: [Send Azure Databricks application logs to Azure Monitor](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/databricks-monitoring/application-logs)
* Content Source: [docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/databricks-monitoring/application-logs.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @Petertaylor9999
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,disk metrics are seems like any disk metric has value of zero is this a known issue or may it be related to using datastorage version the following gives no records sparkmetric cl where name s contains filesystem where value d gt document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11124,28092210938.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-30 13:44:36,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Does enabling Auto-Upgrade for the node-image channel also automatically disable unattended-upgrade on Ubuntu nodes? ,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"The Auto-Upgrade release channel for node-image upgrades is a great feature to be combined with planned maintenance scheduling to control image upgrades in a safe and timely manner. In order for this to be effective however, Azure Ubuntu image users need to also disable the default behavior of unattended-upgrades. Otherwise unattended-upgrades will continue to run outside the planned maintenance window and inhibit the safe and gradual rollout of image patches. The documentation is not clear on if the enablement of Auto-Upgrade of the node-image channel automatically disables unattended-upgrade or does the user need to take another step to add a vm extension to disable unattended-upgrade.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Does enabling Auto-Upgrade for the node-image channel also automatically disable unattended-upgrade on Ubuntu nodes? - The Auto-Upgrade release channel for node-image upgrades is a great feature to be combined with planned maintenance scheduling to control image upgrades in a safe and timely manner. In order for this to be effective however, Azure Ubuntu image users need to also disable the default behavior of unattended-upgrades. Otherwise unattended-upgrades will continue to run outside the planned maintenance window and inhibit the safe and gradual rollout of image patches. The documentation is not clear on if the enablement of Auto-Upgrade of the node-image channel automatically disables unattended-upgrade or does the user need to take another step to add a vm extension to disable unattended-upgrade.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 43da9bdf-a3d3-a65b-b555-60dcc5ac2c55
* Version Independent ID: 9913c705-aeb7-e154-4fdf-164ff1e7ff99
* Content: [AKS Day-2 - Patch and upgrade guidance - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices)
* Content Source: [docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/operator-guides/aks/aks-upgrade-practices.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @rishabhsaha
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,does enabling auto upgrade for the node image channel also automatically disable unattended upgrade on ubuntu nodes the auto upgrade release channel for node image upgrades is a great feature to be combined with planned maintenance scheduling to control image upgrades in a safe and timely manner in order for this to be effective however azure ubuntu image users need to also disable the default behavior of unattended upgrades otherwise unattended upgrades will continue to run outside the planned maintenance window and inhibit the safe and gradual rollout of image patches the documentation is not clear on if the enablement of auto upgrade of the node image channel automatically disables unattended upgrade or does the user need to take another step to add a vm extension to disable unattended upgrade document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login rishabhsaha microsoft alias pnp ,1
8908,23770513249.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-01 15:55:18,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Visio diagram download link is not working. on download it just opens the blank page. ,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ec53963c-4c95-f6e7-90e0-d1e827df50b0
* Version Independent ID: 81cb35e8-e65d-41b7-f53d-5ddada2b6301
* Content: [Scalable web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @ckittel
* Microsoft Alias: **chkittel**",2.0,"Visio diagram download link is not working. on download it just opens the blank page. -
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ec53963c-4c95-f6e7-90e0-d1e827df50b0
* Version Independent ID: 81cb35e8-e65d-41b7-f53d-5ddada2b6301
* Content: [Scalable web application - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/app-service-web-app/scalable-web-app.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @ckittel
* Microsoft Alias: **chkittel**",1,visio diagram download link is not working on download it just opens the blank page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login ckittel microsoft alias chkittel ,1
10876,27426239406.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-01 20:33:27,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Remove false claim of open and transparent pricing for CluedIn,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
Please remove the statement about CluedIn's pricing being open and transparent.
Maybe they changed their website, but they require you to submit a ""pricing inquiry"".
It's frustrating to research MDM vendors and they all want you to contact sales to even get a clue.
It doesn't help to offer false hope in this article. Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 278e83ef-9b90-cb2d-9ff6-0dd8f5ff1b87
* Version Independent ID: 7e63fe30-9080-9207-ad0f-62263379de0c
* Content: [Master data management with Azure and CluedIn - Azure Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/cluedin)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/cluedin.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/data/cluedin.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **Oliver.Kaae**",2.0,"Remove false claim of open and transparent pricing for CluedIn -
Please remove the statement about CluedIn's pricing being open and transparent.
Maybe they changed their website, but they require you to submit a ""pricing inquiry"".
It's frustrating to research MDM vendors and they all want you to contact sales to even get a clue.
It doesn't help to offer false hope in this article. Thanks!
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 278e83ef-9b90-cb2d-9ff6-0dd8f5ff1b87
* Version Independent ID: 7e63fe30-9080-9207-ad0f-62263379de0c
* Content: [Master data management with Azure and CluedIn - Azure Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/data/cluedin)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/data/cluedin.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/data/cluedin.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **Oliver.Kaae**",1,remove false claim of open and transparent pricing for cluedin please remove the statement about cluedin s pricing being open and transparent maybe they changed their website but they require you to submit a pricing inquiry it s frustrating to research mdm vendors and they all want you to contact sales to even get a clue it doesn t help to offer false hope in this article thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias oliver kaae ,1
4093,10567978909.0,IssuesEvent,2019-10-06 09:29:20,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Diagram,Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"Who is the consumer of service discovery?
How the diagram is showing any possible service to service communication?
This diagram is taken as it is by some readers and anything missing or represented not precisely in this document will lead to incorrect concept building in the mind of readers.
Please make this diagram little more mature and perfect.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fccd14ec-192a-ffd8-edec-4296998feb8b
* Version Independent ID: 2bac3769-2613-f739-4796-0737c7cd8919
* Content: [Introduction to microservices architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/introduction#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/introduction.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/introduction.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Diagram - Who is the consumer of service discovery?
How the diagram is showing any possible service to service communication?
This diagram is taken as it is by some readers and anything missing or represented not precisely in this document will lead to incorrect concept building in the mind of readers.
Please make this diagram little more mature and perfect.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: fccd14ec-192a-ffd8-edec-4296998feb8b
* Version Independent ID: 2bac3769-2613-f739-4796-0737c7cd8919
* Content: [Introduction to microservices architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/introduction#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/introduction.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/introduction.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,diagram who is the consumer of service discovery how the diagram is showing any possible service to service communication this diagram is taken as it is by some readers and anything missing or represented not precisely in this document will lead to incorrect concept building in the mind of readers please make this diagram little more mature and perfect document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id edec version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
6408,14517922058.0,IssuesEvent,2020-12-13 21:31:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Attach the original visio diagram to this page ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement example-scenario/subsvc triaged,"Hi, can we have the original visio diagram attached to this page ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f491d2a8-2895-9075-29f2-fde88888b6b6
* Version Independent ID: d59e120b-9968-9212-571b-99345aa8fa83
* Content: [Multiple forests with AD DS, Azure AD, and Azure AD DS - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest-azure-managed)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest-azure-managed.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest-azure-managed.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @nehalineogi
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Attach the original visio diagram to this page - Hi, can we have the original visio diagram attached to this page ?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f491d2a8-2895-9075-29f2-fde88888b6b6
* Version Independent ID: d59e120b-9968-9212-571b-99345aa8fa83
* Content: [Multiple forests with AD DS, Azure AD, and Azure AD DS - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest-azure-managed)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest-azure-managed.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/wvd/multi-forest-azure-managed.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @nehalineogi
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,attach the original visio diagram to this page hi can we have the original visio diagram attached to this page document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login nehalineogi microsoft alias pnp ,1
7671,18797110824.0,IssuesEvent,2021-11-09 00:12:28,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Use full service name for Azure NetApp Files,doc-enhancement cxp triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc,"Geert van Teylingen (ANF PM) here. Can you use the full service name for 'Azure NetApp Files' in this sentence:
Data services use a combination of high-performance storage on Ultra or Premium solid-state disks (SSDs), file storage on **Azure NetApp Files** or Azure Files, and standard blob, archive, and backup storage that can be locally redundant or geo-redundant.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ee474b78-4f66-bf85-33cc-59addf5e0c3d
* Version Independent ID: a381b3c3-ebad-86b4-56ff-133d2490e944
* Content: [Refactor mainframe applications to Azure with Raincode compilers - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-modernization/raincode-reference-architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-modernization/raincode-reference-architecture.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-modernization/raincode-reference-architecture.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **jfrost**",2.0,"Use full service name for Azure NetApp Files - Geert van Teylingen (ANF PM) here. Can you use the full service name for 'Azure NetApp Files' in this sentence:
Data services use a combination of high-performance storage on Ultra or Premium solid-state disks (SSDs), file storage on **Azure NetApp Files** or Azure Files, and standard blob, archive, and backup storage that can be locally redundant or geo-redundant.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ee474b78-4f66-bf85-33cc-59addf5e0c3d
* Version Independent ID: a381b3c3-ebad-86b4-56ff-133d2490e944
* Content: [Refactor mainframe applications to Azure with Raincode compilers - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/app-modernization/raincode-reference-architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/app-modernization/raincode-reference-architecture.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/app-modernization/raincode-reference-architecture.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **jfrost**",1,use full service name for azure netapp files geert van teylingen anf pm here can you use the full service name for azure netapp files in this sentence data services use a combination of high performance storage on ultra or premium solid state disks ssds file storage on azure netapp files or azure files and standard blob archive and backup storage that can be locally redundant or geo redundant document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id ebad content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias jfrost ,1
6633,14972844040.0,IssuesEvent,2021-01-27 23:41:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,PNG version of Icons,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement triaged,"HI there,
While I do appreciate the fact that these icons are available it would be GREAT if you could supply them as PNG as well as SVG. Seeing as there are a lot of Devs and Architects on Mac and the SVG support there is so-so it's a bit of a pain every 6 months when you go back and need a new set of icons. The previews looks like shit in Finder and you always end up needing to figure out whatever script and tool you need to loop through the folders and convert each file to png. Then you need remember to escape the paths cause you included + signs in the paths and what not if you use ""find"".
On top that something like Google Drawing doesn't support svg, which isn't your fault but still.
This seems to be the smoothest on Mac
`brew install librsvg`
cd to Icons in the downloaded svg folder
`for i in */*.svg ; do rsvg-convert -h 512 ""$i""> ""$i"".png ; done `
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"PNG version of Icons - HI there,
While I do appreciate the fact that these icons are available it would be GREAT if you could supply them as PNG as well as SVG. Seeing as there are a lot of Devs and Architects on Mac and the SVG support there is so-so it's a bit of a pain every 6 months when you go back and need a new set of icons. The previews looks like shit in Finder and you always end up needing to figure out whatever script and tool you need to loop through the folders and convert each file to png. Then you need remember to escape the paths cause you included + signs in the paths and what not if you use ""find"".
On top that something like Google Drawing doesn't support svg, which isn't your fault but still.
This seems to be the smoothest on Mac
`brew install librsvg`
cd to Icons in the downloaded svg folder
`for i in */*.svg ; do rsvg-convert -h 512 ""$i""> ""$i"".png ; done `
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,png version of icons hi there while i do appreciate the fact that these icons are available it would be great if you could supply them as png as well as svg seeing as there are a lot of devs and architects on mac and the svg support there is so so it s a bit of a pain every months when you go back and need a new set of icons the previews looks like shit in finder and you always end up needing to figure out whatever script and tool you need to loop through the folders and convert each file to png then you need remember to escape the paths cause you included signs in the paths and what not if you use find on top that something like google drawing doesn t support svg which isn t your fault but still this seems to be the smoothest on mac brew install librsvg cd to icons in the downloaded svg folder for i in svg do rsvg convert h i i png done document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
9119,24055587589.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-16 16:31:24,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Couple of possible mistakes in the 1st flowchart on the page,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
On the right most side, pointers to couple of boxes (""Container Instances"" and ""App Service"") should not be Yes.
Architecturally, shouldn't it be connected by ""No""?
Isn't this the right way to do:
1. Microservice architecture? ->No-> App Service
2. Needs full fledged orchestration? ->No->Container instances
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Couple of possible mistakes in the 1st flowchart on the page -
On the right most side, pointers to couple of boxes (""Container Instances"" and ""App Service"") should not be Yes.
Architecturally, shouldn't it be connected by ""No""?
Isn't this the right way to do:
1. Microservice architecture? ->No-> App Service
2. Needs full fledged orchestration? ->No->Container instances
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,couple of possible mistakes in the flowchart on the page on the right most side pointers to couple of boxes container instances and app service should not be yes architecturally shouldn t it be connected by no isn t this the right way to do microservice architecture no app service needs full fledged orchestration no container instances document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
10218,26543464229.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-19 21:25:26,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,download graphic ?,assigned-to-author product-feedback triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"
the Download an [SVG] graphic is a great idea. however my preference is for visio, or vsxds files. I think SVG is some kind of vector graphic, but not sure and no idea if visio will see it as a useful shape or image. Otherwise, good show on the article! I'm in early stage of work on planning, design and construction of web publishing site.
This is not an ""Issue"" just a simple minded suggestion. ""Submitting"" anyway ;-)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 73dc00bc-c571-72c0-c3de-8e1a35b9e27a
* Version Independent ID: 424eb559-47a7-bcc5-e567-e428e59c11cb
* Content: [E-commerce website running in secured App Service Environment - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"download graphic ? -
the Download an [SVG] graphic is a great idea. however my preference is for visio, or vsxds files. I think SVG is some kind of vector graphic, but not sure and no idea if visio will see it as a useful shape or image. Otherwise, good show on the article! I'm in early stage of work on planning, design and construction of web publishing site.
This is not an ""Issue"" just a simple minded suggestion. ""Submitting"" anyway ;-)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 73dc00bc-c571-72c0-c3de-8e1a35b9e27a
* Version Independent ID: 424eb559-47a7-bcc5-e567-e428e59c11cb
* Content: [E-commerce website running in secured App Service Environment - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/ecommerce-website-running-in-secured-ase.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,download graphic the download an graphic is a great idea however my preference is for visio or vsxds files i think svg is some kind of vector graphic but not sure and no idea if visio will see it as a useful shape or image otherwise good show on the article i m in early stage of work on planning design and construction of web publishing site this is not an issue just a simple minded suggestion submitting anyway document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
9569,24842051175.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-26 13:25:30,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Subnets are redundant,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",2.0,"Subnets are redundant - 
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 46723a24-75ac-f6e2-c172-d3827ca0b7d6
* Version Independent ID: c975744e-e594-5667-14b3-c38824bbe24c
* Content: [Baseline architecture for an AKS cluster - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/baseline-aks.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **prwilk**",1,subnets are redundant document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias prwilk ,1
4478,11199219649.0,IssuesEvent,2020-01-03 18:05:15,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Typo: ""Anomoly""",Pri1 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug triaged,"This feedback isn't about the article. It's for the parent node of the article. The node has a typo: ""Anomoly"". It should be ""Anomaly"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c2a5d359-b35d-f8c1-480e-ea9aff4255b5
* Version Independent ID: 971a1042-d297-7cda-2961-3f5b1b422a9b
* Content: [Anomaly Detector Process - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Typo: ""Anomoly"" - This feedback isn't about the article. It's for the parent node of the article. The node has a typo: ""Anomoly"". It should be ""Anomaly"".
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: c2a5d359-b35d-f8c1-480e-ea9aff4255b5
* Version Independent ID: 971a1042-d297-7cda-2961-3f5b1b422a9b
* Content: [Anomaly Detector Process - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/anomaly-detector-process.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo anomoly this feedback isn t about the article it s for the parent node of the article the node has a typo anomoly it should be anomaly document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9769,25166879073.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-10 21:45:19,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Multiple Virtual WAN Hubs per region,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"Hey Team,
I sent some feedback for the Azure VWAN FAQ page yesterday regarding the same thing. It looks like some of this documentation needs to be updated now that it's possible to provision multiple VWAN hubs per region.
In the section **""Virtual WAN Hub""** it states _""There can only be one hub per Azure region.""_
If you reference the VWAN FAQ page, there is a section that says you can have multiple VWAN Hubs per region.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/virtual-wan-faq#is-it-possible-to-create-multiple-virtual-wan-hubs-in-the-same-region
Thanks for all your work!
Christopher Melendez
Microsoft Azure CSA
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
(Edited PII)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 44ba53f7-4773-946c-fffc-cf51122973f8
* Version Independent ID: 802d7f2e-ee23-c3e1-0294-f3941d0c30c2
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology with Azure Virtual WAN - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/hub-spoke-vwan-architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/hub-spoke-vwan-architecture.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/networking/hub-spoke-vwan-architecture.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yemrea**",1.0,"Multiple Virtual WAN Hubs per region - Hey Team,
I sent some feedback for the Azure VWAN FAQ page yesterday regarding the same thing. It looks like some of this documentation needs to be updated now that it's possible to provision multiple VWAN hubs per region.
In the section **""Virtual WAN Hub""** it states _""There can only be one hub per Azure region.""_
If you reference the VWAN FAQ page, there is a section that says you can have multiple VWAN Hubs per region.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/virtual-wan-faq#is-it-possible-to-create-multiple-virtual-wan-hubs-in-the-same-region
Thanks for all your work!
Christopher Melendez
Microsoft Azure CSA
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
xxxxxx
(Edited PII)
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 44ba53f7-4773-946c-fffc-cf51122973f8
* Version Independent ID: 802d7f2e-ee23-c3e1-0294-f3941d0c30c2
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology with Azure Virtual WAN - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/networking/hub-spoke-vwan-architecture)
* Content Source: [docs/networking/hub-spoke-vwan-architecture.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/networking/hub-spoke-vwan-architecture.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **yemrea**",1,multiple virtual wan hubs per region hey team i sent some feedback for the azure vwan faq page yesterday regarding the same thing it looks like some of this documentation needs to be updated now that it s possible to provision multiple vwan hubs per region in the section virtual wan hub it states there can only be one hub per azure region if you reference the vwan faq page there is a section that says you can have multiple vwan hubs per region thanks for all your work christopher melendez microsoft azure csa xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx edited pii document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id fffc version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login edprice msft microsoft alias yemrea ,1
7250,17210740677.0,IssuesEvent,2021-07-19 03:44:44,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Typo in Bicep CLI command,architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
Based on the steps defined in Bicep example. The Azure CLI command to spin up the example should be `hub-spoke` instead of `hub-spoke-three`
az deployment group create --resource-group hub-spoke --template-file main.bicep
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=bicep#reference-deployment
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @neilpeterson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Typo in Bicep CLI command -
Based on the steps defined in Bicep example. The Azure CLI command to spin up the example should be `hub-spoke` instead of `hub-spoke-three`
az deployment group create --resource-group hub-spoke --template-file main.bicep
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=bicep#reference-deployment
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 104eba32-c77e-b013-e161-ff616d16a0f7
* Version Independent ID: 3bc27d0a-ef32-f5f6-4c85-fe8e2e45155e
* Content: [Hub-spoke network topology in Azure - Azure Reference Architectures](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke?tabs=cli)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/hybrid-networking/hub-spoke.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @neilpeterson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,typo in bicep cli command based on the steps defined in bicep example the azure cli command to spin up the example should be hub spoke instead of hub spoke three az deployment group create resource group hub spoke template file main bicep document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login neilpeterson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10137,26382842334.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-12 09:59:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Subnet icon is missing,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3,"Can't find subnet icon...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**
",1.0,"Subnet icon is missing - Can't find subnet icon...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure Icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**
",1,subnet icon is missing can t find subnet icon document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
11096,27997738098.0,IssuesEvent,2023-03-27 09:36:06,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"""trusted hosts""",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Why on earth are you introducing the phrase ""trusted hosts"" in this context? Bad writing.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 428e4625-191f-a050-ec58-60fd2dddff86
* Version Independent ID: 3a4e385e-5761-3633-1ddf-46e1878b420d
* Content: [Gatekeeper pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/gatekeeper)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/gatekeeper.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/gatekeeper.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"""trusted hosts"" - Why on earth are you introducing the phrase ""trusted hosts"" in this context? Bad writing.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 428e4625-191f-a050-ec58-60fd2dddff86
* Version Independent ID: 3a4e385e-5761-3633-1ddf-46e1878b420d
* Content: [Gatekeeper pattern - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/gatekeeper)
* Content Source: [docs/patterns/gatekeeper.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/patterns/gatekeeper.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1, trusted hosts why on earth are you introducing the phrase trusted hosts in this context bad writing document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
9228,24258329387.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 19:54:40,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Are Azure Container Instances and Kubernetes swapped in the picture. ,assigned-to-author product-feedback triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 guide/subsvc,"
[Enter feedback here]
Azure Kubernetes Service was originally the solution proposed when one has to support full-fledged orchestration. Has that changed recently? Also, for microservices with short lived, event driven processes, Azure Functions were proposed. Has that changed recently with the Azure App Service being proposed for the microservices architecture even though Azure Functions are still proposed for short lived, event driven processes. There is definitely some confusion here compared to what was proposed before this latest version of the decision tree came through.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Are Azure Container Instances and Kubernetes swapped in the picture. -
[Enter feedback here]
Azure Kubernetes Service was originally the solution proposed when one has to support full-fledged orchestration. Has that changed recently? Also, for microservices with short lived, event driven processes, Azure Functions were proposed. Has that changed recently with the Azure App Service being proposed for the microservices architecture even though Azure Functions are still proposed for short lived, event driven processes. There is definitely some confusion here compared to what was proposed before this latest version of the decision tree came through.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choosing an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,are azure container instances and kubernetes swapped in the picture azure kubernetes service was originally the solution proposed when one has to support full fledged orchestration has that changed recently also for microservices with short lived event driven processes azure functions were proposed has that changed recently with the azure app service being proposed for the microservices architecture even though azure functions are still proposed for short lived event driven processes there is definitely some confusion here compared to what was proposed before this latest version of the decision tree came through document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
8353,22141030590.0,IssuesEvent,2022-06-03 06:54:47,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Potential use cases,doc-bug cxp triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 solution-idea/subsvc,"The first sentence under **Potential user cases** says
> These other uses cases have similar design patterns:
The second s in uses should be removed.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f4cc2d26-95f1-a809-8d21-251fa973b084
* Version Independent ID: d452c096-bbea-6b65-36d1-cd56337493ca
* Content: [Real-time asset tracking and management using IoT Central - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @ypriyay
* Microsoft Alias: **priyay**",1.0,"Potential use cases - The first sentence under **Potential user cases** says
> These other uses cases have similar design patterns:
The second s in uses should be removed.
[Enter feedback here]
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: f4cc2d26-95f1-a809-8d21-251fa973b084
* Version Independent ID: d452c096-bbea-6b65-36d1-cd56337493ca
* Content: [Real-time asset tracking and management using IoT Central - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/real-time-asset-tracking-mgmt-iot-central.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @ypriyay
* Microsoft Alias: **priyay**",1,potential use cases the first sentence under potential user cases says these other uses cases have similar design patterns the second s in uses should be removed document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id bbea content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login ypriyay microsoft alias priyay ,1
9427,24570749570.0,IssuesEvent,2022-10-13 08:27:33,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Container access,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc example-scenario/subsvc Pri2,"
[Enter feedback here]
Hi is there a pre-configured container to access this setup?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2edf62c9-d5c7-b4d0-99e7-f271ef0b629e
* Version Independent ID: d9ff7f72-3fbb-3bc6-e787-60b1ccecb698
* Content: [Magento e-commerce platform in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Container access -
[Enter feedback here]
Hi is there a pre-configured container to access this setup?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 2edf62c9-d5c7-b4d0-99e7-f271ef0b629e
* Version Independent ID: d9ff7f72-3fbb-3bc6-e787-60b1ccecb698
* Content: [Magento e-commerce platform in Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) - Azure Example Scenarios](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/example-scenario/magento/magento-azure.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **example-scenario**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,container access hi is there a pre configured container to access this setup document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service example scenario github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5995,13463442584.0,IssuesEvent,2020-09-09 17:35:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Loan Credit Risk Solution,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
Hi, I'm Atul and I'd love to check out the complete solution for the loan credit risk solution on Azure and then try and run it in Azure as well. Thanks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ed6476ec-ceb9-cb1a-92dd-5dbe50b729a0
* Version Independent ID: 0081a02f-b8d0-0945-51e7-a9a53c47f66d
* Content: [Loan Credit Risk + Default Modeling - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Loan Credit Risk Solution -
Hi, I'm Atul and I'd love to check out the complete solution for the loan credit risk solution on Azure and then try and run it in Azure as well. Thanks.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: ed6476ec-ceb9-cb1a-92dd-5dbe50b729a0
* Version Independent ID: 0081a02f-b8d0-0945-51e7-a9a53c47f66d
* Content: [Loan Credit Risk + Default Modeling - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/loan-credit-risk-analyzer-and-default-modeling.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,loan credit risk solution hi i m atul and i d love to check out the complete solution for the loan credit risk solution on azure and then try and run it in azure as well thanks document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login microsoft alias pnp ,1
5757,13110591441.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-04 20:58:37,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Small correction ,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-bug solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
In the diagram , it shows BC2 instead of B2C.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a8c8a5bf-e3a5-3e47-51d9-a15364f8e38b
* Version Independent ID: 419a15fd-abf6-31de-f64b-627cc4466650
* Content: [Commerce Chatbot - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/commerce-chatbot)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/commerce-chatbot.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/commerce-chatbot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Small correction -
[Enter feedback here]
In the diagram , it shows BC2 instead of B2C.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: a8c8a5bf-e3a5-3e47-51d9-a15364f8e38b
* Version Independent ID: 419a15fd-abf6-31de-f64b-627cc4466650
* Content: [Commerce Chatbot - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/commerce-chatbot)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/commerce-chatbot.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/commerce-chatbot.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,small correction in the diagram it shows instead of document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
10141,26383478686.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-12 10:25:52,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,"Update the ""release notes"" and remove references to old ZIP filenames",doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1,"There are at least 2 additional updates since January 2021:
Can someone please update the page itself to give the updates since January 2021??
It also does not make sense to refer to the filename if it is updated behind-the-scenes without additional context. Either update the page with release notes and file version... or just don't say anything about the version number at all.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1.0,"Update the ""release notes"" and remove references to old ZIP filenames - There are at least 2 additional updates since January 2021:
Can someone please update the page itself to give the updates since January 2021??
It also does not make sense to refer to the filename if it is updated behind-the-scenes without additional context. Either update the page with release notes and file version... or just don't say anything about the version number at all.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 6624d44c-f9f6-02f8-2c67-0f0637fed62e
* Version Independent ID: 9346a8ff-bab5-be2c-9dc1-d546fda1efa9
* Content: [Azure icons - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/icons/)
* Content Source: [docs/icons/index.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/icons/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1,update the release notes and remove references to old zip filenames there are at least additional updates since january can someone please update the page itself to give the updates since january it also does not make sense to refer to the filename if it is updated behind the scenes without additional context either update the page with release notes and file version or just don t say anything about the version number at all document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
9722,25104724760.0,IssuesEvent,2022-11-08 15:52:10,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Awards?,assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 Product-bug guide/subsvc,"What awards did it win. I can't find anything on the web....I didn't use Bing for searching, though...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 06b04b15-1daa-44c9-6392-4743527ebd20
* Version Independent ID: d0fbe85f-6167-4f34-c2a0-6304e6b0cf9d
* Content: [Judgment Call - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/responsible-innovation/judgmentcall)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/responsible-innovation/judgmentcall.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/responsible-innovation/judgmentcall.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dcass
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Awards? - What awards did it win. I can't find anything on the web....I didn't use Bing for searching, though...
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 06b04b15-1daa-44c9-6392-4743527ebd20
* Version Independent ID: d0fbe85f-6167-4f34-c2a0-6304e6b0cf9d
* Content: [Judgment Call - Azure Application Architecture Guide](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/responsible-innovation/judgmentcall)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/responsible-innovation/judgmentcall.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/guide/responsible-innovation/judgmentcall.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **guide**
* GitHub Login: @dcass
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,awards what awards did it win i can t find anything on the web i didn t use bing for searching though document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service guide github login dcass microsoft alias pnp ,1
4930,11852648237.0,IssuesEvent,2020-03-24 20:21:38,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Dark theme ruins contrast of diagrams,Pri1 architecture-center/svc cxp docs-experience solution-idea/subsvc triaged,"https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Dark theme ruins contrast of diagrams - https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 1b68d40f-4b98-396b-f4c3-b8650fc4633f
* Version Independent ID: 26b362d7-b46a-fa03-c2aa-48b581b67bf0
* Content: [Advanced Analytics Architecture - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/advanced-analytics-on-big-data.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,dark theme ruins contrast of diagrams document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
9969,25830113430.0,IssuesEvent,2022-12-12 15:32:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Choose a candidate service flowchart corrections,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri1 azure-guide/subsvc,"
Hello maintainers,
The candidate selection graph is incorrect and is causing the Azure Service Fabrics usage is to be less than it should be as it does in fact support all of dotnet and java SDKs. SF should also be available for non-managed service. How does one update the diagram and publish amendments and so on? I will be glad to contribute. Thanks
Wayne
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @paolosalvatori
* Microsoft Alias: **paolos**",1.0,"Choose a candidate service flowchart corrections -
Hello maintainers,
The candidate selection graph is incorrect and is causing the Azure Service Fabrics usage is to be less than it should be as it does in fact support all of dotnet and java SDKs. SF should also be available for non-managed service. How does one update the diagram and publish amendments and so on? I will be glad to contribute. Thanks
Wayne
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 510808e8-db5d-6b07-9a04-6edb743a2dfc
* Version Independent ID: 20d098aa-ef31-cb26-d677-765cfc9a7164
* Content: [Choose an Azure compute service - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree)
* Content Source: [docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/guide/technology-choices/compute-decision-tree.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @paolosalvatori
* Microsoft Alias: **paolos**",1,choose a candidate service flowchart corrections hello maintainers the candidate selection graph is incorrect and is causing the azure service fabrics usage is to be less than it should be as it does in fact support all of dotnet and java sdks sf should also be available for non managed service how does one update the diagram and publish amendments and so on i will be glad to contribute thanks wayne document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login paolosalvatori microsoft alias paolos ,1
10610,27145735837.0,IssuesEvent,2023-02-16 19:50:55,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed, Visio file of this architecture is incorrect,doc-enhancement cxp assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri1,"
[Enter feedback here]
The Visio file is wrong
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",2.0," Visio file of this architecture is incorrect -
[Enter feedback here]
The Visio file is wrong
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **architectures**",1, visio file of this architecture is incorrect the visio file is wrong document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for learn microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login edprice msft microsoft alias architectures ,1
9230,24260921973.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-27 22:38:34,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,We recommend you do not assign operations masters roles to the domain controllers deployed in Azure.,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc reference-architecture/subsvc Pri2,"Is there any rationale to support the statement ""We recommend you do not assign operations masters roles to the domain controllers deployed in Azure.""?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"We recommend you do not assign operations masters roles to the domain controllers deployed in Azure. - Is there any rationale to support the statement ""We recommend you do not assign operations masters roles to the domain controllers deployed in Azure.""?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 65f26361-0def-4ae9-e28a-8a8d4f97b87f
* Version Independent ID: ef55eb02-6543-88ad-4f89-5a553848bc67
* Content: [Deploy AD DS in an Azure virtual network - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/identity/adds-extend-domain.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @telmosampaio
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,we recommend you do not assign operations masters roles to the domain controllers deployed in azure is there any rationale to support the statement we recommend you do not assign operations masters roles to the domain controllers deployed in azure document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login telmosampaio microsoft alias pnp ,1
9188,24183289128.0,IssuesEvent,2022-09-23 10:57:22,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Article needs expansion,doc-enhancement assigned-to-author triaged architecture-center/svc Pri3 solution-idea/subsvc,"Kindly elaborate the design and describe services used and the way various components interact with each other.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0086ec3a-1c25-966d-da07-7cf4258e187f
* Version Independent ID: f96d13e8-a5a2-b3c4-8c44-0d9e32a3ddf5
* Content: [Scalable web apps with Azure Redis Cache - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1.0,"Article needs expansion - Kindly elaborate the design and describe services used and the way various components interact with each other.
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 0086ec3a-1c25-966d-da07-7cf4258e187f
* Version Independent ID: f96d13e8-a5a2-b3c4-8c44-0d9e32a3ddf5
* Content: [Scalable web apps with Azure Redis Cache - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps.yml](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/main/docs/solution-ideas/articles/scalable-web-apps.yml)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @EdPrice-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **edprice**",1,article needs expansion kindly elaborate the design and describe services used and the way various components interact with each other document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login edprice msft microsoft alias edprice ,1
5358,12397321885.0,IssuesEvent,2020-05-20 22:25:46,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,More detail pls,Pri2 architecture-center/svc solution-idea/subsvc,"More detail pls
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 839bcfd0-caf7-c1f2-0dab-3340d9f8f528
* Version Independent ID: 8631e812-4b30-9c93-a007-203bc05a238e
* Content: [Social App for Mobile and Web with Authentication - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"More detail pls - More detail pls
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 839bcfd0-caf7-c1f2-0dab-3340d9f8f528
* Version Independent ID: 8631e812-4b30-9c93-a007-203bc05a238e
* Content: [Social App for Mobile and Web with Authentication - Azure Solution Ideas](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/solution-ideas/articles/social-mobile-and-web-app-with-authentication.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **solution-idea**
* GitHub Login: @adamboeglin
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,more detail pls more detail pls document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service solution idea github login adamboeglin microsoft alias pnp ,1
5784,13160032943.0,IssuesEvent,2020-08-10 16:51:30,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Q: What are the considerations in choosing Traefik ingress controller,Pri2 architecture-center/svc assigned-to-author doc-enhancement reference-architecture/subsvc triaged,"
[Enter feedback here]
Can you please elaborate here in more details what is the design decision on choosing :
Use Traefik as the Kubernetes ingress controller.
Where we have other ingress controllers like AGIC, NGIX, and HAProxy, etc, Any special consideration or benefit in choosing Traefik here?
One more thing if we use AGIC then do we need to use App Gateway in front of that?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 80713a10-3600-b049-116e-db4c723f54e9
* Version Independent ID: 777a3dae-bcf3-6680-aaad-1c8a2fe98850
* Content: [Case study – Contoso Bicycle - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-in/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/case-study-contoso)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/case-study-contoso.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/case-study-contoso.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",2.0,"Q: What are the considerations in choosing Traefik ingress controller -
[Enter feedback here]
Can you please elaborate here in more details what is the design decision on choosing :
Use Traefik as the Kubernetes ingress controller.
Where we have other ingress controllers like AGIC, NGIX, and HAProxy, etc, Any special consideration or benefit in choosing Traefik here?
One more thing if we use AGIC then do we need to use App Gateway in front of that?
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 80713a10-3600-b049-116e-db4c723f54e9
* Version Independent ID: 777a3dae-bcf3-6680-aaad-1c8a2fe98850
* Content: [Case study – Contoso Bicycle - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-in/azure/architecture/reference-architectures/containers/aks/case-study-contoso)
* Content Source: [docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/case-study-contoso.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/reference-architectures/containers/aks/case-study-contoso.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **reference-architecture**
* GitHub Login: @PageWriter-MSFT
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,q what are the considerations in choosing traefik ingress controller can you please elaborate here in more details what is the design decision on choosing use traefik as the kubernetes ingress controller where we have other ingress controllers like agic ngix and haproxy etc any special consideration or benefit in choosing traefik here one more thing if we use agic then do we need to use app gateway in front of that document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id aaad content content source service architecture center sub service reference architecture github login pagewriter msft microsoft alias pnp ,1
3341,9527450411.0,IssuesEvent,2019-04-29 04:00:56,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Excellent Document,architecture-center/svc cloud-design-principles/subsvc cxp kudos triaged,"Nicely laid out and just enough details. Thank you
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8080bec2-ff05-badc-ffb7-194922d03ce2
* Version Independent ID: cb2aa366-a5b6-b0dc-0e2f-84376ba7b7f3
* Content: [Design reliable Azure applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reliability/#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reliability/index.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/live/docs/reliability/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Excellent Document - Nicely laid out and just enough details. Thank you
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 8080bec2-ff05-badc-ffb7-194922d03ce2
* Version Independent ID: cb2aa366-a5b6-b0dc-0e2f-84376ba7b7f3
* Content: [Design reliable Azure applications](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/reliability/#feedback)
* Content Source: [docs/reliability/index.md](https://github.com/mspnp/architecture-center/blob/live/docs/reliability/index.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **cloud-design-principles**
* GitHub Login: @MikeWasson
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,excellent document nicely laid out and just enough details thank you document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id badc version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service cloud design principles github login mikewasson microsoft alias pnp ,1
10221,26543643530.0,IssuesEvent,2023-01-19 21:35:42,MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,https://api.github.com/repos/MicrosoftDocs/architecture-center,closed,Feature Request: Make Diagrams 'Whiteboard'able,assigned-to-author product-feedback triaged architecture-center/svc Pri2 azure-guide/subsvc,"Let the readers open diagrams, on this page and other pages in **Architecture Center**, directly in Microsoft Whiteboard App, like a template. I couldn't find any way to create custom template, otherwise I would've loved to contribute that feature myself.
[Here](https://www.invisionapp.com/news/announcement/freehand-templates) are some links for the [inspiration](https://www.invisionapp.com/freehand/templates/detail/architecture-brainstorm-template).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 95a0c8e3-8abb-aa09-c746-ae94113f3c14
* Version Independent ID: 5b56b900-3c15-4392-dd73-85e496954dc7
* Content: [Identifying microservice boundaries - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1.0,"Feature Request: Make Diagrams 'Whiteboard'able - Let the readers open diagrams, on this page and other pages in **Architecture Center**, directly in Microsoft Whiteboard App, like a template. I couldn't find any way to create custom template, otherwise I would've loved to contribute that feature myself.
[Here](https://www.invisionapp.com/news/announcement/freehand-templates) are some links for the [inspiration](https://www.invisionapp.com/freehand/templates/detail/architecture-brainstorm-template).
---
#### Document Details
⚠ *Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.*
* ID: 95a0c8e3-8abb-aa09-c746-ae94113f3c14
* Version Independent ID: 5b56b900-3c15-4392-dd73-85e496954dc7
* Content: [Identifying microservice boundaries - Azure Architecture Center](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries)
* Content Source: [docs/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries.md](https://github.com/microsoftdocs/architecture-center/blob/master/docs/microservices/model/microservice-boundaries.md)
* Service: **architecture-center**
* Sub-service: **azure-guide**
* GitHub Login: @doodlemania2
* Microsoft Alias: **pnp**",1,feature request make diagrams whiteboard able let the readers open diagrams on this page and other pages in architecture center directly in microsoft whiteboard app like a template i couldn t find any way to create custom template otherwise i would ve loved to contribute that feature myself are some links for the document details ⚠ do not edit this section it is required for docs microsoft com ➟ github issue linking id version independent id content content source service architecture center sub service azure guide github login microsoft alias pnp ,1