before_revision: Using the presence or frequency of keywords is a classic approach in the formal analysis of text, but has the drawback of glossing over the relationality of word meanings. Word embedding models overcome this problem by constructing a standardized meaning space where words are assigned a location based on relations of similarity to , and difference from, other words based on how they are used in natural language samples. We show how word embeddings  can be put to the task of interpretation via two kinds of navigation. First, one can hold terms constant and measure how the embedding space moves around them--much like astronomers measured the changing of celestial bodies with the seasons. Second, one can also hold the embedding space constant and see how documents or authors move relative to it--just as ships use the stars on a given night to determine their location. Using the empirical case of immigration discourse in the United States, we demonstrate the merits of these two broad strategies to advance formal approaches to cultural analysis .
after_revision: Using the frequency of keywords is a classic approach in the formal analysis of text, but has the drawback of glossing over the relationality of word meanings. Word embedding models overcome this problem by constructing a standardized and continuous "meaning-space" where words are assigned a location based on relations of similarity to other words based on how they are used in natural language samples. We show how word embeddings are commensurate with prevailing theories of meaning in sociology and can be put to the task of interpretation via two kinds of navigation. First, one can hold terms constant and measure how the embedding space moves around them -- much like astronomers measured the changing of celestial bodies with the seasons. Second, one can also hold the embedding space constant and see how documents or authors move relative to it -- just as ships use the stars on a given night to determine their location. Using the empirical case of immigration discourse in the United States, we demonstrate the merits of these two broad strategies for advancing important topics in cultural theory, including social marking, media fields, echo chambers, and cultural diffusion and change more broadly .
edit_actions: D
edit_actions: presence or
edit_actions: coherence
edit_actions: coherence clarity coherence
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: meaning space
edit_actions: and continuous "meaning-space"
edit_actions: clarity
edit_actions: clarity clarity clarity
edit_actions: D
edit_actions: , and difference from,
edit_actions: coherence
edit_actions: clarity coherence coherence
edit_actions: A
edit_actions: are commensurate with prevailing theories of meaning in sociology and
edit_actions: meaning-changed
edit_actions: clarity meaning-changed meaning-changed
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: them--much
edit_actions: them -- much
edit_actions: others
edit_actions: clarity others others
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: it--just
edit_actions: it -- just
edit_actions: others
edit_actions: fluency others others
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: to advance formal approaches to cultural analysis
edit_actions: for advancing important topics in cultural theory, including social marking, media fields, echo chambers, and cultural diffusion and change more broadly
edit_actions: meaning-changed
edit_actions: clarity meaning-changed meaning-changed