before_revision: Text style transfer is the task that generates a sentence by preserving the content of the input sentence and transferring the style. Most existing studies are progressing on non-parallel datasets because parallel datasets are limited and hard to construct. In this work, we introduce a method that follows two stages in non-parallel datasets. The first stage is to delete attribute markers of a sentence directly through the classifier. The second stage is to generate the transferred sentence by combining the content tokens and the target style. We evaluate systems on two benchmark datasets . Transferred sentences are evaluated in terms of context, style, fluency, and semantic. These evaluation metricsare used to determine a stable system. Only robust systems in all evaluation metrics are suitable for use in real applications. Many previous systems are difficult to use in certain situations because they are unstable in some evaluation metrics. However, our system is stable in all  evaluation metrics and has results comparable to other models. 
after_revision: Text style transfer is the task that generates a sentence by preserving the content of the input sentence and transferring the style. Most existing studies are progressing on non-parallel datasets because parallel datasets are limited and hard to construct. In this work, we introduce a method that follows two stages in non-parallel datasets. The first stage is to delete attribute markers of a sentence directly through a classifier. The second stage is to generate a transferred sentence by combining the content tokens and the target style. We experiment on two benchmark datasets and evaluate context, style, fluency, and semantic. It is difficult to select the best system using only these automatic metrics, but it is possible to select stable systems. We consider only robust systems in all automatic evaluation metrics to be the minimum conditions that can be used in real applications. Many previous systems are difficult to use in certain situations because performance is significantly lower in several evaluation metrics. However, our system is stable in all automatic evaluation metrics and has results comparable to other models. Also, we compare the performance results of our system and the unstable system through human evaluation. Our code and data are available at the URL
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: the
edit_actions: a
edit_actions: fluency
edit_actions: fluency others fluency
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: the
edit_actions: a
edit_actions: fluency
edit_actions: fluency fluency fluency
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: evaluate systems
edit_actions: experiment
edit_actions: clarity
edit_actions: clarity clarity clarity
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: . Transferred sentences are evaluated in terms of
edit_actions: and evaluate
edit_actions: coherence
edit_actions: coherence clarity coherence
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: These evaluation metricsare used to determine a stable system. Only
edit_actions: It is difficult to select the best system using only these automatic metrics, but it is possible to select stable systems. We consider only
edit_actions: clarity
edit_actions: clarity clarity style
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: evaluation metrics are suitable for use
edit_actions: automatic evaluation metrics to be the minimum conditions that can be used
edit_actions: clarity
edit_actions: clarity meaning-changed style
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: they are unstable in some
edit_actions: performance is significantly lower in several
edit_actions: clarity
edit_actions: clarity meaning-changed clarity
edit_actions: A
edit_actions: automatic
edit_actions: meaning-changed
edit_actions: meaning-changed meaning-changed coherence
edit_actions: A
edit_actions: Also, we compare the performance results of our system and the unstable system through human evaluation. Our code and data are available at the URL
edit_actions: meaning-changed
edit_actions: meaning-changed meaning-changed meaning-changed