before_revision: Another source of dispute has been the Baghdad stone i ption in a Turkish script , which some interpret saying Baba Nanak Fakir was there in 15111512 , while some state 15211522 (and that he lived in the Middle East for 11 years away from his family). Others, particularly Western scholars, argue that the stone inscription is from the 19th century and the stone is not a reliable evidence that Guru Nanak visited Baghdad in early 16th century. Moreover, beyond the stone, no evidence or mention of Guru Nanak's journey in the Middle East has been found in any other Middle Eastern textual or epigraphical records. Claims have been asserted of additional inscriptions, but no one has been able to locate and verify them.
after_revision: Another source of dispute has been the Baghdad stone , bearing an inscription in a Turkish script . Some interpret the inscription as saying Baba Nanak Fakir was there in 15111512 ; others read it as saying 15211522 (and that he lived in the Middle East for 11 years away from his family). Others, particularly Western scholars, argue that the stone inscription is from the 19th century and the stone is not a reliable evidence that Guru Nanak visited Baghdad in early 16th century. Moreover, beyond the stone, no evidence or mention of Guru Nanak's journey in the Middle East has been found in any other Middle Eastern textual or epigraphical records. Claims have been asserted of additional inscriptions, but no one has been able to locate and verify them.
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: i ption
edit_actions: , bearing an inscription
edit_actions: clarity
edit_actions: meaning-changed clarity clarity
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: , which some interpret
edit_actions: . Some interpret the inscription as
edit_actions: clarity
edit_actions: coherence clarity clarity
edit_actions: R
edit_actions: , while some state
edit_actions: ; others read it as saying
edit_actions: style
edit_actions: style style coherence