Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-fc2e4671-7e20-44ad-a373-899a077f1401.jsonl

@@ -12,3 +12,5 @@
 {"tstamp": 1726511722.6092, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "7cc267058378483ab0f6a1312fd4ef5d", "0_model_name": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "0_prompt": "Please read this scenario prior to answering the question.\n\nArmstrong Defense Industries is the prime contractor for the Dreadnought Unmanned Aircraft System program.\n\nOver the course of this contract, the company has grown rapidly by acquisition and has inherited numerous different procurement processes and related IT systems. Armstrong Defense is moving aggressively to consolidate and reduce redundant procurement processes and systems. The CEO has announced that the company will seek to leverage higher volume discounts and lower related IT support costs by instituting a preferred supplier program.\n\nTo achieve this goal, Armstrong Defense needs to define Baseline and Target Architectures. These architectures must address key stakeholders concerns such as:\n\n1. What groups of people should be involved in procurement-related business processes?\n2. What current applications do those groups use?\n3. Which procurement-related business processes are supported by zero, one, or many existing applications?\n4. What are the overall lifetimes of the Request for Proposal and Purchase Order business objects?\n5. What non-procurement applications will need to be integrated with any new procurement applications?\n6. What data will need to be shared?\n\nAt present, there are no particularly useful architectural assets related to this initiative. All assets need to be acquired and customized or created from scratch. The company prefers to implement existing package applications from systems vendors with little customization.\n\nThe architecture development project has just completed its Architecture Context iteration cycle and is about to begin the Architecture Definition iteration cycle.\n\nArmstrong Defense is using TOGAF for its internal Enterprise Architecture activities. It uses an iterative approach for executing Architecture Development Method (ADM) projects.\n\nYou are serving as the Lead Architect.\n\nYou have been asked to identify the most appropriate architecture viewpoints for this situation. Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer?\n\nAnswer A: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Baseline Business Process catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a Technology Portfolio catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data diagram\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with an Actor/Process/Data catalog\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with a System/Technology matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a Data Dissemination diagram\n\nAnswer B: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the key business objects with Product Lifecycle diagrams\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with Application Communication diagrams and an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Business Function matrix and a System/Data matrix\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a System/Organization matrix and a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nAnswer C: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and an Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the key business objects with Data Lifecycle diagrams\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with Application Communication diagrams and an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a System/Data matrix\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with an Application and User Location diagram and a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nAnswer D: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with an Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture using a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with en Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture using Application Communication diagrams end an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a System/Data matrix", "0_output": [["Please read this scenario prior to answering the question.\n\nArmstrong Defense Industries is the prime contractor for the Dreadnought Unmanned Aircraft System program.\n\nOver the course of this contract, the company has grown rapidly by acquisition and has inherited numerous different procurement processes and related IT systems. Armstrong Defense is moving aggressively to consolidate and reduce redundant procurement processes and systems. The CEO has announced that the company will seek to leverage higher volume discounts and lower related IT support costs by instituting a preferred supplier program.\n\nTo achieve this goal, Armstrong Defense needs to define Baseline and Target Architectures. These architectures must address key stakeholders concerns such as:\n\n1. What groups of people should be involved in procurement-related business processes?\n2. What current applications do those groups use?\n3. Which procurement-related business processes are supported by zero, one, or many existing applications?\n4. What are the overall lifetimes of the Request for Proposal and Purchase Order business objects?\n5. What non-procurement applications will need to be integrated with any new procurement applications?\n6. What data will need to be shared?\n\nAt present, there are no particularly useful architectural assets related to this initiative. All assets need to be acquired and customized or created from scratch. The company prefers to implement existing package applications from systems vendors with little customization.\n\nThe architecture development project has just completed its Architecture Context iteration cycle and is about to begin the Architecture Definition iteration cycle.\n\nArmstrong Defense is using TOGAF for its internal Enterprise Architecture activities. It uses an iterative approach for executing Architecture Development Method (ADM) projects.\n\nYou are serving as the Lead Architect.\n\nYou have been asked to identify the most appropriate architecture viewpoints for this situation. Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer?\n\nAnswer A: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Baseline Business Process catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a Technology Portfolio catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data diagram\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with an Actor/Process/Data catalog\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with a System/Technology matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a Data Dissemination diagram\n\nAnswer B: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the key business objects with Product Lifecycle diagrams\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with Application Communication diagrams and an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Business Function matrix and a System/Data matrix\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a System/Organization matrix and a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nAnswer C: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and an Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the key business objects with Data Lifecycle diagrams\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with Application Communication diagrams and an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a System/Data matrix\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with an Application and User Location diagram and a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nAnswer D: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with an Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture using a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with en Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture using Application Communication diagrams end an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a System/Data matrix", "The Open Group Architecture Framework\n\nTOGAF began to be developed in 1995 by The Open Group, based on the United States Department of Defense's TAFIM and Capgemini's Integrated Architecture Framework (IAF).  As of 2016, The Open Group claims that TOGAF is employed by 80% of Global 50 companies and 60% of Fortune 500 companies.\nOverview\nAn architecture framework is a set of tools that can be used for developing a broad range of different architectures. It should:\ndescribe a method for defining an information system in terms of a set of building blocks\nshow how the building blocks fit together\ncontain a set of tools\nprovide a common vocabulary\ninclude a list of recommended standards\ninclude a list of compliant products that can be used to implement the building blocks.\nThe ANSI/IEEE Standard 1471-2000 specification of architecture (of software-intensive systems) may be stated as: \"the fundamental organization of a system, embodied in its components, their relationships to each other and the environment, and the principles governing its design and evolution\".\nHowever TOGAF has its own view, which may be specified as either a \"formal description of a system, or a detailed plan of the system at component level to guide its implementation\", or as \"the structure of components, their interrelationships, and the principles and guidelines governing their design and evolution over time\".\nThe Architecture Development Method (ADM) is the core of TOGAF which describes a method for developing and managing the life-cycle of enterprise architecture."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "5ab5abbab89e4154856081f226798056", "1_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "1_prompt": "Please read this scenario prior to answering the question.\n\nArmstrong Defense Industries is the prime contractor for the Dreadnought Unmanned Aircraft System program.\n\nOver the course of this contract, the company has grown rapidly by acquisition and has inherited numerous different procurement processes and related IT systems. Armstrong Defense is moving aggressively to consolidate and reduce redundant procurement processes and systems. The CEO has announced that the company will seek to leverage higher volume discounts and lower related IT support costs by instituting a preferred supplier program.\n\nTo achieve this goal, Armstrong Defense needs to define Baseline and Target Architectures. These architectures must address key stakeholders concerns such as:\n\n1. What groups of people should be involved in procurement-related business processes?\n2. What current applications do those groups use?\n3. Which procurement-related business processes are supported by zero, one, or many existing applications?\n4. What are the overall lifetimes of the Request for Proposal and Purchase Order business objects?\n5. What non-procurement applications will need to be integrated with any new procurement applications?\n6. What data will need to be shared?\n\nAt present, there are no particularly useful architectural assets related to this initiative. All assets need to be acquired and customized or created from scratch. The company prefers to implement existing package applications from systems vendors with little customization.\n\nThe architecture development project has just completed its Architecture Context iteration cycle and is about to begin the Architecture Definition iteration cycle.\n\nArmstrong Defense is using TOGAF for its internal Enterprise Architecture activities. It uses an iterative approach for executing Architecture Development Method (ADM) projects.\n\nYou are serving as the Lead Architect.\n\nYou have been asked to identify the most appropriate architecture viewpoints for this situation. Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer?\n\nAnswer A: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Baseline Business Process catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a Technology Portfolio catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data diagram\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with an Actor/Process/Data catalog\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with a System/Technology matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a Data Dissemination diagram\n\nAnswer B: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the key business objects with Product Lifecycle diagrams\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with Application Communication diagrams and an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Business Function matrix and a System/Data matrix\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a System/Organization matrix and a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nAnswer C: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and an Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the key business objects with Data Lifecycle diagrams\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with Application Communication diagrams and an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a System/Data matrix\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with an Application and User Location diagram and a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nAnswer D: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with an Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture using a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with en Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture using Application Communication diagrams end an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a System/Data matrix", "1_output": [["Please read this scenario prior to answering the question.\n\nArmstrong Defense Industries is the prime contractor for the Dreadnought Unmanned Aircraft System program.\n\nOver the course of this contract, the company has grown rapidly by acquisition and has inherited numerous different procurement processes and related IT systems. Armstrong Defense is moving aggressively to consolidate and reduce redundant procurement processes and systems. The CEO has announced that the company will seek to leverage higher volume discounts and lower related IT support costs by instituting a preferred supplier program.\n\nTo achieve this goal, Armstrong Defense needs to define Baseline and Target Architectures. These architectures must address key stakeholders concerns such as:\n\n1. What groups of people should be involved in procurement-related business processes?\n2. What current applications do those groups use?\n3. Which procurement-related business processes are supported by zero, one, or many existing applications?\n4. What are the overall lifetimes of the Request for Proposal and Purchase Order business objects?\n5. What non-procurement applications will need to be integrated with any new procurement applications?\n6. What data will need to be shared?\n\nAt present, there are no particularly useful architectural assets related to this initiative. All assets need to be acquired and customized or created from scratch. The company prefers to implement existing package applications from systems vendors with little customization.\n\nThe architecture development project has just completed its Architecture Context iteration cycle and is about to begin the Architecture Definition iteration cycle.\n\nArmstrong Defense is using TOGAF for its internal Enterprise Architecture activities. It uses an iterative approach for executing Architecture Development Method (ADM) projects.\n\nYou are serving as the Lead Architect.\n\nYou have been asked to identify the most appropriate architecture viewpoints for this situation. Based on TOGAF 9, which of the following is the best answer?\n\nAnswer A: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Baseline Business Process catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a Technology Portfolio catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data diagram\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with an Actor/Process/Data catalog\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with a System/Technology matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a Data Dissemination diagram\n\nAnswer B: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the key business objects with Product Lifecycle diagrams\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with Application Communication diagrams and an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Business Function matrix and a System/Data matrix\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a System/Organization matrix and a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nAnswer C: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and an Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the key business objects with Data Lifecycle diagrams\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture with Application Communication diagrams and an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a System/Data matrix\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with a Business Service/Function catalog and a Business Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with an Application and User Location diagram and a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture with a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nAnswer D: In the early iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Baseline Business Architecture with an Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the Baseline Application Architecture with a System/Function matrix\nDescribe the Baseline Data Architecture using a Data Entity/Data Component catalog\n\nIn the later iterations of the Architecture Definition:\n\nDescribe the Target Business Architecture with en Organization/Actor catalog\nDescribe the Target Application Architecture using Application Communication diagrams end an Application Interaction matrix\nDescribe the Target Data Architecture with a System/Data matrix", "The Open Group Architecture Framework\n\nBusiness capability-based planning Guidance on how to use TOGAF to develop security architectures and SOA\nThe latest version is TOGAF 10, launched on 25 April 2022.\nThe Open Group provides TOGAF free of charge to organizations for their own internal noncommercial purposes.\nTOGAF pillars\nEnterprise architecture domains\nTOGAF is based on four interrelated areas of specialization called architecture domains:\nBusiness architecture which defines the business strategy, governance, organization, and key business processes of the organization\nData architecture which describes the structure of an organization's logical and physical data assets and the associated data management resources\nApplications architecture which provides a blueprint for the individual systems to be deployed, the interactions between the application systems, and their relationships to the core business processes of the organization with the frameworks for services to be exposed as business functions for integration\nTechnical architecture, or technology architecture, which describes the hardware, software, and network infrastructure needed to support the deployment of core, mission-critical applications\nArchitecture Development Method\nThe Architecture Development Method (ADM) is applied to develop an enterprise architecture which will meet the business and information technology needs of an organization. It may be tailored to the organization's needs and is then employed to manage the execution of architecture planning activities."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1726512086.7887, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "4b1f81ad55ba4315976816662cc254a8", "0_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "0_prompt": "Towards Unified Alignment Between Agents,Humans, and Environment ", "0_output": [["Towards Unified Alignment Between Agents,Humans, and Environment ", "Title: Towards Unified Alignment Between Agents, Humans, and Environment\n\nAbstract: The rapid progress of foundation models has led to the prosperity of autonomous agents, which leverage the universal capabilities of foundation models to conduct reasoning, decision-making, and environmental interaction. However, the efficacy of agents remains limited when operating in intricate, realistic environments. In this work, we introduce the principles of $\\mathbf{U}$nified $\\mathbf{A}$lignment for $\\mathbf{A}$gents ($\\mathbf{UA}^2$), which advocate for the simultaneous alignment of agents with human intentions, environmental dynamics, and self-constraints such as the limitation of monetary budgets. From the perspective of $\\mathbf{UA}^2$, we review the current agent research and highlight the neglected factors in existing agent benchmarks and method candidates. We also conduct proof-of-concept studies by introducing realistic features to WebShop, including user profiles to demonstrate intentions, personalized reranking for complex environmental dynamics, and runtime cost statistics to reflect self-constraints. We then follow the principles of $\\mathbf{UA}^2$ to propose an initial design of our agent, and benchmark its performance with several candidate baselines in the retrofitted WebShop. The extensive experimental results further prove the importance of the principles of $\\mathbf{UA}^2$. Our research sheds light on the next steps of autonomous agent research with improved general problem-solving abilities."]], "0_corpus": "arxiv", "1_conv_id": "9fa5e360a4634b9eb781f99879d5a450", "1_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "1_prompt": "Towards Unified Alignment Between Agents,Humans, and Environment ", "1_output": [["Towards Unified Alignment Between Agents,Humans, and Environment ", "Title: Towards Unified Alignment Between Agents, Humans, and Environment\n\nAbstract: The rapid progress of foundation models has led to the prosperity of autonomous agents, which leverage the universal capabilities of foundation models to conduct reasoning, decision-making, and environmental interaction. However, the efficacy of agents remains limited when operating in intricate, realistic environments. In this work, we introduce the principles of $\\mathbf{U}$nified $\\mathbf{A}$lignment for $\\mathbf{A}$gents ($\\mathbf{UA}^2$), which advocate for the simultaneous alignment of agents with human intentions, environmental dynamics, and self-constraints such as the limitation of monetary budgets. From the perspective of $\\mathbf{UA}^2$, we review the current agent research and highlight the neglected factors in existing agent benchmarks and method candidates. We also conduct proof-of-concept studies by introducing realistic features to WebShop, including user profiles to demonstrate intentions, personalized reranking for complex environmental dynamics, and runtime cost statistics to reflect self-constraints. We then follow the principles of $\\mathbf{UA}^2$ to propose an initial design of our agent, and benchmark its performance with several candidate baselines in the retrofitted WebShop. The extensive experimental results further prove the importance of the principles of $\\mathbf{UA}^2$. Our research sheds light on the next steps of autonomous agent research with improved general problem-solving abilities."]], "1_corpus": "arxiv"}
 {"tstamp": 1726513501.6176, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "2879018da7ca4d8ca57c95f99af06a21", "0_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "0_prompt": "A benchmark to measure the performance of contextualized word embeddings against traditional embeddings.", "0_output": [["A benchmark to measure the performance of contextualized word embeddings against traditional embeddings.", "Title: Word Embeddings for Chemical Patent Natural Language Processing\n\nAbstract: We evaluate chemical patent word embeddings against known biomedical embeddings and show that they outperform the latter extrinsically and intrinsically. We also show that using contextualized embeddings can induce predictive models of reasonable performance for this domain over a relatively small gold standard."]], "0_corpus": "arxiv", "1_conv_id": "3becfa2a63804aa2a8c0e3a1707cec9f", "1_model_name": "intfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct", "1_prompt": "A benchmark to measure the performance of contextualized word embeddings against traditional embeddings.", "1_output": [["A benchmark to measure the performance of contextualized word embeddings against traditional embeddings.", "Title: A Survey on Contextual Embeddings\n\nAbstract: Contextual embeddings, such as ELMo and BERT, move beyond global word representations like Word2Vec and achieve ground-breaking performance on a wide range of natural language processing tasks. Contextual embeddings assign each word a representation based on its context, thereby capturing uses of words across varied contexts and encoding knowledge that transfers across languages. In this survey, we review existing contextual embedding models, cross-lingual polyglot pre-training, the application of contextual embeddings in downstream tasks, model compression, and model analyses."]], "1_corpus": "arxiv"}
+{"tstamp": 1726526944.4935, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "1044f0194c01499ea2ad2e2302bd5ba9", "0_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "0_prompt": "stray current", "0_output": [["stray current", "Stray voltage\n\nStray voltage is a result of the design of a 4 wire distribution system and as such has existed as long as such systems have been used. Stray voltage became a problem for the dairy industry some time after electric milking machines were introduced, and large numbers of animals were simultaneously in contact with metal objects grounded to the electric distribution system and the earth. Numerous studies document the causes, physiological effects, and prevention, of stray voltage in the farm environment. Today, stray voltage on farms is regulated by state governments and controlled by the design of equipotential planes in areas where livestock eat, drink or give milk. Commercially available neutral isolators also prevent elevated potentials on the utility system neutral from raising the voltage of farm neutral or ground wires.\nRailway stray current\nTypically a rail transit systems will have at least one of the rails as a return conductor for the traction current. This arrangement is common, based on economic considerations, since it does not require the installation of an additional return conductor. This rail is in contact with the earth at many places throughout its length. Since current will follow every parallel path between source and load, some part of the traction current will also flow through the earth. This is normally referred to as leakage current or stray current. The amount of leaking current depends on the conductance of the return tracks compared to the soil; and on the quality of the insulation between the tracks and soil. Where the railway uses direct current, this stray current can cause damage to other buried metallic objects by electrolysis and accelerate corrosion of metal objects in contact with the soil.\nStray Voltage Effects"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "b6bdacaf9be145a5b1314f1b3c787df7", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "1_prompt": "stray current", "1_output": [["stray current", "Stray voltage\n\nStray voltage is a result of the design of a 4 wire distribution system and as such has existed as long as such systems have been used. Stray voltage became a problem for the dairy industry some time after electric milking machines were introduced, and large numbers of animals were simultaneously in contact with metal objects grounded to the electric distribution system and the earth. Numerous studies document the causes, physiological effects, and prevention, of stray voltage in the farm environment. Today, stray voltage on farms is regulated by state governments and controlled by the design of equipotential planes in areas where livestock eat, drink or give milk. Commercially available neutral isolators also prevent elevated potentials on the utility system neutral from raising the voltage of farm neutral or ground wires.\nRailway stray current\nTypically a rail transit systems will have at least one of the rails as a return conductor for the traction current. This arrangement is common, based on economic considerations, since it does not require the installation of an additional return conductor. This rail is in contact with the earth at many places throughout its length. Since current will follow every parallel path between source and load, some part of the traction current will also flow through the earth. This is normally referred to as leakage current or stray current. The amount of leaking current depends on the conductance of the return tracks compared to the soil; and on the quality of the insulation between the tracks and soil. Where the railway uses direct current, this stray current can cause damage to other buried metallic objects by electrolysis and accelerate corrosion of metal objects in contact with the soil.\nStray Voltage Effects"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1726527021.4177, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "4b9ba34af416462b8c2fc16fd505a8de", "0_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "0_prompt": "tell me about signalling systems for class 1 railways", "0_output": [["tell me about signalling systems for class 1 railways", "Title: Railway Track Specific Traffic Signal Selection Using Deep Learning\n\nAbstract: With the railway transportation Industry moving actively towards automation, accurate location and inventory of wayside track assets like traffic signals, crossings, switches, mileposts, etc. is of extreme importance. With the new Positive Train Control (PTC) regulation coming into effect, many railway safety rules will be tied directly to location of assets like mileposts and signals. Newer speed regulations will be enforced based on location of the Train with respect to a wayside asset. Hence it is essential for the railroads to have an accurate database of the types and locations of these assets. This paper talks about a real-world use-case of detecting railway signals from a camera mounted on a moving locomotive and tracking their locations. The camera is engineered to withstand the environment factors on a moving train and provide a consistent steady image at around 30 frames per second. Using advanced image analysis and deep learning techniques, signals are detected in these camera images and a database of their locations is created. Railway signals differ a lot from road signals in terms of shapes and rules for placement with respect to track. Due to space constraint and traffic densities in urban areas signals are not placed on the same side of the track and multiple lines can run in parallel. Hence there is need to associate signal detected with the track on which the train runs. We present a method to associate the signals to the specific track they belong to using a video feed from the front facing camera mounted on the lead locomotive. A pipeline of track detection, region of interest selection, signal detection has been implemented which gives an overall accuracy of 94.7% on a route covering 150km with 247 signals."]], "0_corpus": "arxiv", "1_conv_id": "76418008e48941bfa2ab46f4f09babd0", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "1_prompt": "tell me about signalling systems for class 1 railways", "1_output": [["tell me about signalling systems for class 1 railways", "Title: A Radio Based Intelligent Railway Grade Crossing System to Avoid Collision\n\nAbstract: Railway grade crossing is become the major headache for the transportation system. This paper describes an intelligent railway crossing control system for multiple tracks that features a controller which receives messages from incoming and outgoing trains by sensors. These messages contain detail information including the direction and identity of a train. Depending on those messages the controller device decides whenever the railroad crossing gate will close or open."]], "1_corpus": "arxiv"}

data/retrieval_individual-fc2e4671-7e20-44ad-a373-899a077f1401.jsonl

@@ -94,3 +94,7 @@
 {"tstamp": 1726515990.9608, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1726515990.6887, "finish": 1726515990.9608, "ip": "", "conv_id": "4c959b03506d431493f721066cac35ed", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": "What is the tallest building?", "output": [["What is the tallest building?", "History of the world's tallest buildings\n\nThe tallest building in the world, as of , is the Burj Khalifa in Dubai. The title of \"world's tallest building\" has been held  by various buildings in modern times, including the Lincoln Cathedral in Lincoln, England, and the Empire State Building and the original World Trade Center, both in New York City.\nBefore the modern skyscraper era emerged, between  1311 and 1884 the tallest buildings and structures were mostly Christian churches and cathedrals. Prior to then, the tallest buildings in the world cannot be conclusively determined. For instance, the Lighthouse of Alexandria, which was completed in approximately 280 BC, has been estimated to have been  tall, but its true height is not known. For thousands of years, the Great Pyramid in Egypt was the tallest structure in the world until Lincoln Cathedral of 1311, but the Great Pyramid is not considered a building since it is not habitable. Similarly, the Eiffel Tower was the world's tallest structure from 1889, when it was built, but not the tallest building."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1726516095.8821, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1726516093.726, "finish": 1726516095.8821, "ip": "", "conv_id": "8c1e86ad154c42f28b750bd5d72efb37", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": "What is the top grossing movie of 2019?", "output": [["What is the top grossing movie of 2019?", "List of highest-grossing films\n\nFilms generate income from several revenue streams, including theatrical exhibition, home video, television broadcast rights, and merchandising. However, theatrical box-office earnings are the primary metric for trade publications in assessing the success of a film, mostly because of the availability of the data compared to sales figures for home video and broadcast rights, but also because of historical practice. Included on the list are charts of the top box-office earners (ranked by both the nominal and real value of their revenue), a chart of high-grossing films by calendar year, a timeline showing the transition of the highest-grossing film record, and a chart of the highest-grossing film franchises and series. All charts are ranked by international theatrical box-office performance where possible, excluding income derived from home video, broadcasting rights, and merchandise."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1726516095.8821, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1726516093.726, "finish": 1726516095.8821, "ip": "", "conv_id": "f8a50fdf1c7b42e6a39f3749ab75003a", "model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "prompt": "What is the top grossing movie of 2019?", "output": [["What is the top grossing movie of 2019?", "List of highest-grossing films\n\nWhile inflation has eroded the achievements of most films from the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, there are franchises originating from that period that are still active. Besides the Star Wars and Superman franchises, James Bond and Godzilla films are still being released periodically; all four are among the highest-grossing franchises. Some of the older films that held the record of highest-grossing film still have respectable grosses by today's standards, but no longer compete numerically against today's top-earners in an era of much higher individual ticket prices. When those prices are adjusted for inflation, however, then Gone with the Wind—which was the highest-grossing film outright for twenty-five years—is still the highest-grossing film of all time. All grosses on the list are expressed in U.S. dollars at their nominal value, except where stated otherwise.\nHighest-grossing films\nWith a worldwide box-office gross of over $2.9 billion, Avatar is proclaimed to be the \"highest-grossing\" film, but such claims usually refer to theatrical revenues only and do not take into account home video and television income, which can form a significant portion of a film's earnings. Once revenue from home entertainment is factored in, it is not immediately clear which film is the most successful. Titanic earned $1.2 billion from video and DVD sales and rentals, in addition to the $2.2 billion it grossed in theaters. While complete sales data are not available for Avatar, it earned $345 million from the sale of sixteen million DVD and Blu-ray units in North America, and ultimately sold a total of thirty million DVD and Blu-ray units worldwide. After home video income is accounted for, both films have earned over $3 billion each. Television broadcast rights will also substantially add to a film's earnings, with a film often earning the equivalent of as much as 20–25% of its theatrical box office for two television runs, on top of pay-per-view revenues; Titanic earned a further $55 million from the NBC and HBO broadcast rights, equating to about 9% of its North American gross."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1726526927.8917, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "embed-english-v3.0", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1726526925.3557, "finish": 1726526927.8917, "ip": "", "conv_id": "1044f0194c01499ea2ad2e2302bd5ba9", "model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "prompt": "stray current", "output": [["stray current", "Stray voltage\n\nStray voltage is a result of the design of a 4 wire distribution system and as such has existed as long as such systems have been used. Stray voltage became a problem for the dairy industry some time after electric milking machines were introduced, and large numbers of animals were simultaneously in contact with metal objects grounded to the electric distribution system and the earth. Numerous studies document the causes, physiological effects, and prevention, of stray voltage in the farm environment. Today, stray voltage on farms is regulated by state governments and controlled by the design of equipotential planes in areas where livestock eat, drink or give milk. Commercially available neutral isolators also prevent elevated potentials on the utility system neutral from raising the voltage of farm neutral or ground wires.\nRailway stray current\nTypically a rail transit systems will have at least one of the rails as a return conductor for the traction current. This arrangement is common, based on economic considerations, since it does not require the installation of an additional return conductor. This rail is in contact with the earth at many places throughout its length. Since current will follow every parallel path between source and load, some part of the traction current will also flow through the earth. This is normally referred to as leakage current or stray current. The amount of leaking current depends on the conductance of the return tracks compared to the soil; and on the quality of the insulation between the tracks and soil. Where the railway uses direct current, this stray current can cause damage to other buried metallic objects by electrolysis and accelerate corrosion of metal objects in contact with the soil.\nStray Voltage Effects"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1726526927.8917, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-3-large", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1726526925.3557, "finish": 1726526927.8917, "ip": "", "conv_id": "b6bdacaf9be145a5b1314f1b3c787df7", "model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "prompt": "stray current", "output": [["stray current", "Stray voltage\n\nStray voltage is a result of the design of a 4 wire distribution system and as such has existed as long as such systems have been used. Stray voltage became a problem for the dairy industry some time after electric milking machines were introduced, and large numbers of animals were simultaneously in contact with metal objects grounded to the electric distribution system and the earth. Numerous studies document the causes, physiological effects, and prevention, of stray voltage in the farm environment. Today, stray voltage on farms is regulated by state governments and controlled by the design of equipotential planes in areas where livestock eat, drink or give milk. Commercially available neutral isolators also prevent elevated potentials on the utility system neutral from raising the voltage of farm neutral or ground wires.\nRailway stray current\nTypically a rail transit systems will have at least one of the rails as a return conductor for the traction current. This arrangement is common, based on economic considerations, since it does not require the installation of an additional return conductor. This rail is in contact with the earth at many places throughout its length. Since current will follow every parallel path between source and load, some part of the traction current will also flow through the earth. This is normally referred to as leakage current or stray current. The amount of leaking current depends on the conductance of the return tracks compared to the soil; and on the quality of the insulation between the tracks and soil. Where the railway uses direct current, this stray current can cause damage to other buried metallic objects by electrolysis and accelerate corrosion of metal objects in contact with the soil.\nStray Voltage Effects"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1726526985.3637, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1726526984.6629, "finish": 1726526985.3637, "ip": "", "conv_id": "4b9ba34af416462b8c2fc16fd505a8de", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "tell me about signalling systems for class 1 railways", "output": [["tell me about signalling systems for class 1 railways", "Title: Railway Track Specific Traffic Signal Selection Using Deep Learning\n\nAbstract: With the railway transportation Industry moving actively towards automation, accurate location and inventory of wayside track assets like traffic signals, crossings, switches, mileposts, etc. is of extreme importance. With the new Positive Train Control (PTC) regulation coming into effect, many railway safety rules will be tied directly to location of assets like mileposts and signals. Newer speed regulations will be enforced based on location of the Train with respect to a wayside asset. Hence it is essential for the railroads to have an accurate database of the types and locations of these assets. This paper talks about a real-world use-case of detecting railway signals from a camera mounted on a moving locomotive and tracking their locations. The camera is engineered to withstand the environment factors on a moving train and provide a consistent steady image at around 30 frames per second. Using advanced image analysis and deep learning techniques, signals are detected in these camera images and a database of their locations is created. Railway signals differ a lot from road signals in terms of shapes and rules for placement with respect to track. Due to space constraint and traffic densities in urban areas signals are not placed on the same side of the track and multiple lines can run in parallel. Hence there is need to associate signal detected with the track on which the train runs. We present a method to associate the signals to the specific track they belong to using a video feed from the front facing camera mounted on the lead locomotive. A pipeline of track detection, region of interest selection, signal detection has been implemented which gives an overall accuracy of 94.7% on a route covering 150km with 247 signals."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
+{"tstamp": 1726526985.3637, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-3-large", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1726526984.6629, "finish": 1726526985.3637, "ip": "", "conv_id": "76418008e48941bfa2ab46f4f09babd0", "model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "prompt": "tell me about signalling systems for class 1 railways", "output": [["tell me about signalling systems for class 1 railways", "Title: A Radio Based Intelligent Railway Grade Crossing System to Avoid Collision\n\nAbstract: Railway grade crossing is become the major headache for the transportation system. This paper describes an intelligent railway crossing control system for multiple tracks that features a controller which receives messages from incoming and outgoing trains by sensors. These messages contain detail information including the direction and identity of a train. Depending on those messages the controller device decides whenever the railroad crossing gate will close or open."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}