Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-23cee96f-6768-4f6e-9a62-131dedf90618.jsonl

@@ -56,3 +56,4 @@
 {"tstamp": 1732391705.2552, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "b593344a0dc441379cf4178e0e3bb662", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "mass formula for elementare particles", "0_output": [["mass formula for elementare particles", "Elementary particle\n\nOverview All elementary particles are either bosons or fermions. These classes are distinguished by their quantum statistics: fermions obey Fermi–Dirac statistics and bosons obey Bose–Einstein statistics. Their spin is differentiated via the spin–statistics theorem: it is half-integer for fermions, and integer for bosons.\nIn the Standard Model, elementary particles are represented for predictive utility as point particles. Though extremely successful, the Standard Model is limited by its omission of gravitation and has some parameters arbitrarily added but unexplained.\nCosmic abundance of elementary particles\nAccording to the current models of Big Bang nucleosynthesis, the primordial composition of visible matter of the universe should be about 75% hydrogen and 25% helium-4 (in mass). Neutrons are made up of one up and two down quarks, while protons are made of two up and one down quark. Since the other common elementary particles (such as electrons, neutrinos, or weak bosons) are so light or so rare when compared to atomic nuclei, we can neglect their mass contribution to the observable universe's total mass. Therefore, one can conclude that most of the visible mass of the universe consists of protons and neutrons, which, like all baryons, in turn consist of up quarks and down quarks.\nSome estimates imply that there are roughly  baryons (almost entirely protons and neutrons) in the observable universe.\nThe number of protons in the observable universe is called the Eddington number."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "e370b033dc984ddfa8ddb95b84a8a656", "1_model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "1_prompt": "mass formula for elementare particles", "1_output": [["mass formula for elementare particles", "Atomic mass\n\nThe atomic mass (ma or m) is the mass of an atom. Although the SI unit of mass is the kilogram (symbol: kg), atomic mass is often expressed in the non-SI unit dalton (symbol: Da) – equivalently, unified atomic mass unit (u). 1 Da is defined as  of the mass of a free carbon-12 atom at rest in its ground state. The protons and neutrons of the nucleus account for nearly all of the total mass of atoms, with the electrons and nuclear binding energy making minor contributions. Thus, the numeric value of the atomic mass when expressed in daltons has nearly the same value as the mass number. Conversion between mass in kilograms and mass in daltons can be done using the atomic mass constant .\nThe formula used for conversion is:\nwhere  is the molar mass constant,  is the Avogadro constant, and  is the experimentally determined molar mass of carbon-12."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1732391729.401, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "c7f3275bd6414786928823d6d44d0112", "0_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "0_prompt": "Koide formula", "0_output": [["Koide formula", "Koide formula\n\nThe Koide formula is an unexplained empirical equation discovered by Yoshio Koide in 1981. In its original form, it is not fully empirical but a set of guesses for a model for masses of quarks and leptons, as well as CKM angles. From this model it survives the observation about the masses of the three charged leptons; later authors have extended the relation to neutrinos, quarks, and other families of particles.\nFormula\nThe Koide formula is\nwhere the masses of the electron, muon, and tau are measured respectively as   and  the digits in parentheses are the uncertainties in the last digits. This gives"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "7fd6e51e77004377a78dd7dab520c56d", "1_model_name": "intfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct", "1_prompt": "Koide formula", "1_output": [["Koide formula", "Koide formula\n\nThe Koide formula is an unexplained empirical equation discovered by Yoshio Koide in 1981. In its original form, it is not fully empirical but a set of guesses for a model for masses of quarks and leptons, as well as CKM angles. From this model it survives the observation about the masses of the three charged leptons; later authors have extended the relation to neutrinos, quarks, and other families of particles.\nFormula\nThe Koide formula is\nwhere the masses of the electron, muon, and tau are measured respectively as   and  the digits in parentheses are the uncertainties in the last digits. This gives"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1732395622.7209, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "6a721dc7ce2841edb1e524173406f10e", "0_model_name": "text-embedding-004", "0_prompt": "hello hello", "0_output": [["hello hello", "Hello (Adele song)\n\n\"Hello\" was a massive global success, topping the records charts in a record-setting 36 countries, including in the United Kingdom where it became Adele's second chart topper, following \"Someone Like You\", and had the largest opening week sales in three years. In the United States, \"Hello\" debuted atop the Billboard Hot 100, reigning for ten consecutive weeks while becoming Adele's fourth number-one single on the chart and breaking several records, including becoming the first song to sell over a million digital copies in a week. By the end of 2015, it had sold 12.3 million units globally (combined sales and track-equivalent streams) and was the year's 7th best-selling single while it stands as one of the best-selling digital singles of all-time.\nThe accompanying music video was directed by Xavier Dolan and co-stars Adele and Tristan Wilds. It broke the Vevo and YouTube records for achieving over 27.7 million views within a 24-hour span, and the record for the shortest time to reach one billion views (87 days) respectively. \"Hello\" broke the iTunes records for being number 1 in most countries (102 countries). The music video for the song received seven nominations at the 2016 MTV Video Music Awards, including Video of the Year and Best Female Video. At the 59th Annual Grammy Awards, \"Hello\" won three awards: Record of the Year, Song of the Year, and Best Pop Solo Performance. The song also won the Brit Award for British Single, and APRA Award for International Work of the Year."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "03d27370948640219078e5752bc95716", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "1_prompt": "hello hello", "1_output": [["hello hello", "Hello\n\nHello is a salutation or greeting in the English language. It is first attested in writing from 1826.\nEarly uses\nHello, with that spelling, was used in publications in the U.S. as early as the 18 October 1826 edition of the Norwich Courier of Norwich, Connecticut. Another early use was an 1833 American book called The Sketches and Eccentricities of Col. David Crockett, of West Tennessee, which was reprinted that same year in The London Literary Gazette. The word was extensively used in literature by the 1860s.\nEtymology\nAccording to the Oxford English Dictionary, hello is an alteration of hallo, hollo, which came from Old High German \"halâ, holâ, emphatic imperative of halôn, holôn to fetch, used especially in hailing a ferryman\". It also connects the development of hello to the influence of an earlier form, holla, whose origin is in the French holà (roughly, 'whoa there!', from French là 'there'). As in addition to hello, halloo, hallo, hollo, hullo and (rarely) hillo also exist as variants or related words, the word can be spelt using any of all five vowels.\nBill Bryson asserts in his book Mother Tongue that \"hello\" is a contraction of the Old English phrase hál béo þu (\"Hale be thou\", or \"whole be thou\", meaning a wish for good health; cf. \"goodbye\" which is a contraction of \"God be with ye\")."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1732397405.6613, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "9e28486ee4ab4058bdcd0d0c6728f79d", "0_model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "638a80dada674cf7a35d0a9b7a8213ef", "1_model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}

data/retrieval_individual-23cee96f-6768-4f6e-9a62-131dedf90618.jsonl

@@ -162,3 +162,5 @@
 {"tstamp": 1732391721.9756, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732391718.5835, "finish": 1732391721.9756, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7fd6e51e77004377a78dd7dab520c56d", "model_name": "intfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct", "prompt": "Koide formula", "output": [["Koide formula", "Koide formula\n\nThe Koide formula is an unexplained empirical equation discovered by Yoshio Koide in 1981. In its original form, it is not fully empirical but a set of guesses for a model for masses of quarks and leptons, as well as CKM angles. From this model it survives the observation about the masses of the three charged leptons; later authors have extended the relation to neutrinos, quarks, and other families of particles.\nFormula\nThe Koide formula is\nwhere the masses of the electron, muon, and tau are measured respectively as   and  the digits in parentheses are the uncertainties in the last digits. This gives"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1732395583.6695, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-004", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732395582.8527, "finish": 1732395583.6695, "ip": "", "conv_id": "6a721dc7ce2841edb1e524173406f10e", "model_name": "text-embedding-004", "prompt": "hello hello", "output": [["hello hello", "Hello (Adele song)\n\n\"Hello\" was a massive global success, topping the records charts in a record-setting 36 countries, including in the United Kingdom where it became Adele's second chart topper, following \"Someone Like You\", and had the largest opening week sales in three years. In the United States, \"Hello\" debuted atop the Billboard Hot 100, reigning for ten consecutive weeks while becoming Adele's fourth number-one single on the chart and breaking several records, including becoming the first song to sell over a million digital copies in a week. By the end of 2015, it had sold 12.3 million units globally (combined sales and track-equivalent streams) and was the year's 7th best-selling single while it stands as one of the best-selling digital singles of all-time.\nThe accompanying music video was directed by Xavier Dolan and co-stars Adele and Tristan Wilds. It broke the Vevo and YouTube records for achieving over 27.7 million views within a 24-hour span, and the record for the shortest time to reach one billion views (87 days) respectively. \"Hello\" broke the iTunes records for being number 1 in most countries (102 countries). The music video for the song received seven nominations at the 2016 MTV Video Music Awards, including Video of the Year and Best Female Video. At the 59th Annual Grammy Awards, \"Hello\" won three awards: Record of the Year, Song of the Year, and Best Pop Solo Performance. The song also won the Brit Award for British Single, and APRA Award for International Work of the Year."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1732395583.6695, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-3-large", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732395582.8527, "finish": 1732395583.6695, "ip": "", "conv_id": "03d27370948640219078e5752bc95716", "model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "prompt": "hello hello", "output": [["hello hello", "Hello\n\nHello is a salutation or greeting in the English language. It is first attested in writing from 1826.\nEarly uses\nHello, with that spelling, was used in publications in the U.S. as early as the 18 October 1826 edition of the Norwich Courier of Norwich, Connecticut. Another early use was an 1833 American book called The Sketches and Eccentricities of Col. David Crockett, of West Tennessee, which was reprinted that same year in The London Literary Gazette. The word was extensively used in literature by the 1860s.\nEtymology\nAccording to the Oxford English Dictionary, hello is an alteration of hallo, hollo, which came from Old High German \"halâ, holâ, emphatic imperative of halôn, holôn to fetch, used especially in hailing a ferryman\". It also connects the development of hello to the influence of an earlier form, holla, whose origin is in the French holà (roughly, 'whoa there!', from French là 'there'). As in addition to hello, halloo, hallo, hollo, hullo and (rarely) hillo also exist as variants or related words, the word can be spelt using any of all five vowels.\nBill Bryson asserts in his book Mother Tongue that \"hello\" is a contraction of the Old English phrase hál béo þu (\"Hale be thou\", or \"whole be thou\", meaning a wish for good health; cf. \"goodbye\" which is a contraction of \"God be with ye\")."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1732397393.2244, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732397391.0425, "finish": 1732397393.2244, "ip": "", "conv_id": "9e28486ee4ab4058bdcd0d0c6728f79d", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1732397393.2244, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1732397391.0425, "finish": 1732397393.2244, "ip": "", "conv_id": "638a80dada674cf7a35d0a9b7a8213ef", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}