Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-3c73e733-b3f5-49ee-809f-5dd8857c42b8.jsonl

@@ -12,3 +12,6 @@
 {"tstamp": 1728844571.8699, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "937eb886a854493db82fe81098edaee6", "0_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "0_prompt": "I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "0_output": [["I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "Title: Gauge fixing, BRS invariance and Ward identities for randomly stirred flows\n\nAbstract: The Galilean invariance of the Navier-Stokes equation is shown to be akin to a global gauge symmetry familiar from quantum field theory. This symmetry leads to a multiple counting of infinitely many inertial reference frames in the path integral approach to randomly stirred fluids. This problem is solved by fixing the gauge, i.e., singling out one reference frame. The gauge fixed theory has an underlying Becchi-Rouet-Stora (BRS) symmetry which leads to the Ward identity relating the exact inverse response and vertex functions. This identification of Galilean invariance as a gauge symmetry is explored in detail, for different gauge choices and by performing a rigorous examination of a discretized version of the theory. The Navier-Stokes equation is also invariant under arbitrary rectilinear frame accelerations, known as extended Galilean invariance (EGI). We gauge fix this extended symmetry and derive the generalized Ward identity that follows from the BRS invariance of the gauge-fixed theory. This new Ward identity reduces to the standard one in the limit of zero acceleration. This gauge-fixing approach unambiguously shows that Galilean invariance and EGI constrain only the zero mode of the vertex but none of the higher wavenumber modes."]], "0_corpus": "arxiv", "1_conv_id": "a1a0869b95ea496599857615f3c60278", "1_model_name": "BM25", "1_prompt": "I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "1_output": [["I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "Title: Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Training\n\nAbstract: Text embeddings are useful features in many applications such as semantic search and computing text similarity. Previous work typically trains models customized for different use cases, varying in dataset choice, training objective and model architecture. In this work, we show that contrastive pre-training on unsupervised data at scale leads to high quality vector representations of text and code. The same unsupervised text embeddings that achieve new state-of-the-art results in linear-probe classification also display impressive semantic search capabilities and sometimes even perform competitively with fine-tuned models. On linear-probe classification accuracy averaging over 7 tasks, our best unsupervised model achieves a relative improvement of 4% and 1.8% over previous best unsupervised and supervised text embedding models respectively. The same text embeddings when evaluated on large-scale semantic search attains a relative improvement of 23.4%, 14.7%, and 10.6% over previous best unsupervised methods on MSMARCO, Natural Questions and TriviaQA benchmarks, respectively. Similarly to text embeddings, we train code embedding models on (text, code) pairs, obtaining a 20.8% relative improvement over prior best work on code search."]], "1_corpus": "arxiv"}
 {"tstamp": 1728844658.1904, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "fa877bb4df294938a14edfa07cd7a9e2", "0_model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "0_prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "0_output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why does it do this ? if - __name__ == '__main__' \nDuplicate of:\nWhat does if __name__== \"__main__\" do? \n\nConsider this code:\nif __name__ == '__main__':\n    import pdb\n    pdb.run(\"interact()\\n\")\n\nWhat does the following line mean?\nif(__name__=='__main__')\n\nI fainted.\n\nA: That is a check to see if you are directly running the script or if it is included in a library.\nWhen you run a python script like this:\npython myScript.py\n\nIt sends a parameter, telling you to run the programs first method, which is widely called \"main\", so when __name__ is __main__ you know that the program was executed from a command line or double clicked.\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "4ef9e9b1bc71482eb11dc10533d2d421", "1_model_name": "BM25", "1_prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "1_output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What is the purpose of __name__? What does __name__ do? I have only seen it paired with __main__ and nothing else.\nI know that the classic if __name__ == __main__: defines the behavior when acting as a package vs running as stand-alone.\nHowever what other usages are there for __name__?\n\nA: __name__ is \"__main__\" if you're executing the script directly. If you're importing a module, __name__ is the name of the module.\nfoo.py:\nprint(__name__)\n\nbar.py \nimport foo\n\nRun the scripts:\n$ python foo.py\n__main__\n$ python bar.py \nfoo\n\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1728844695.1577, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "6503d527b2674859b39a0e67bfe4c5cd", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "91c93825dd9d447cb85315ce721872c5", "1_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "History of robots\n\nIt features a female humanoid automaton standing by a basin filled with water.When the user pulls the lever, the water drains and the female automaton refills the basin. Furthermore, he created a robotic musical band. According to Mark Rosheim, unlike Greek designs Arab automata worked with dramatic illusion and manipulated the human perception for practical application. The segmental gears described in The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices, published by Al-Jazari shortly before his death in 1206, appeared 100 years later in the most advanced European clocks. Al-Jazari also published instructions on the construction of humanoid automata. The first water clocks modeled on Arabic designs were constructed in Europe about 1000 CE, possibly on the basis of the information that was transmitted during Muslim-Christian contact in Sicily and Spain. Among the first recorded European water clocks is that of Gerbert of Aurillac, built in 985 CE. Hero's works on automata were translated into Latin amid the 12th century Renaissance. The early 13th-century artist-engineer Villard de Honnecourt sketched plans for several automata. "]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844778.9544, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "65a08f5050e24a38ab32472ed40be417", "0_model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "0_prompt": "Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "0_output": [["Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "Habitable zone\n\nK2-18b is an exoplanet 124 light-years away, orbiting in the habitable zone of the K2-18, a red dwarf. This planet is significant for water vapor found in its atmosphere; this was announced on September 17, 2019.\nIn September 2020, astronomers identified 24 superhabitable planet (planets better than Earth) contenders, from among more than 4000 confirmed exoplanets at present, based on astrophysical parameters, as well as the natural history of known life forms on the Earth.\nHabitability outside the HZ\nLiquid-water environments have been found to exist in the absence of atmospheric pressure and at temperatures outside the HZ temperature range. For example, Saturn's moons Titan and Enceladus and Jupiter's moons Europa and Ganymede, all of which are outside the habitable zone, may hold large volumes of liquid water in subsurface oceans.\nOutside the HZ, tidal heating and radioactive decay are two possible heat sources that could contribute to the existence of liquid water. Abbot and Switzer (2011) put forward the possibility that subsurface water could exist on rogue planets as a result of radioactive decay-based heating and insulation by a thick surface layer of ice.\nWith some theorising that life on Earth may have actually originated in stable, subsurface habitats, it has been suggested that it may be common for wet subsurface extraterrestrial habitats such as these to 'teem with life'. On Earth itself, living organisms may be found more than  below the surface."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "2d660695adcb48cf8b11f9c9c3a41817", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "1_output": [["Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "Alpha Centauri\n\nIn 2009, computer simulations showed that a planet might have been able to form near the inner edge of Alpha Centauri B's habitable zone, which extends from  from the star. Certain special assumptions, such as considering that the Alpha Centauri pair may have initially formed with a wider separation and later moved closer to each other (as might be possible if they formed in a dense star cluster), would permit an accretion-friendly environment farther from the star. Bodies around Alpha Centauri A would be able to orbit at slightly farther distances due to its stronger gravity. In addition, the lack of any brown dwarfs or gas giants in close orbits around Alpha Centauri make the likelihood of terrestrial planets greater than otherwise. A theoretical study indicates that a radial velocity analysis might detect a hypothetical planet of  in Alpha Centauri B's habitable zone.\nRadial velocity measurements of Alpha Centauri B made with the High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher spectrograph were sufficiently sensitive to detect a  planet within the habitable zone of the star (i.e. with an orbital period P = 200 days), but no planets were detected.\nCurrent estimates place the probability of finding an Earth-like planet around Alpha Centauri at roughly 75%. The observational thresholds for planet detection in the habitable zones by the radial velocity method are currently (2017) estimated to be about  for Alpha Centauri A,  for Alpha Centauri B, and  for Proxima Centauri.\nEarly computer-generated models of planetary formation predicted the existence of terrestrial planets around both Alpha Centauri A and B, but most recent numerical investigations have shown that the gravitational pull of the companion star renders the accretion of planets difficult. Despite these difficulties, given the similarities to the Sun in spectral types, star type, age and probable stability of the orbits, it has been suggested that this stellar system could hold one of the best possibilities for harbouring extraterrestrial life on a potential planet."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844824.7868, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "23a8b784dbd24d8889e76a061e4e08f1", "0_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "0_prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "0_output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why do the machines allow/initiate the building of a new Zion? In the Matrix Reloaded, the Architect says:\n\nThe function of the One is now to return to the Source, allowing a temporary dissemination of the code you carry, reinserting the prime program. After which, you will be required to select from the Matrix 23 individuals - 16 female, 7 male - to rebuild Zion. Failure to comply with this process will result in a cataclysmic system crash, killing everyone connected to the Matrix, which, coupled with the extermination of Zion, will ultimately result in the extinction of the entire human race.\n\nWhy do the machines initiate the re-building of Zion?\n\nA: As was discussed elsewhere on the site, the machines are not interested in humans being wiped out, they (as shown in Animatrix) just want to co-exist with humans.\nAs such, the machines allow the building of new Zion so that humans would not - as the quote you provided says - would not go extinct.\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "d17a7716687f4121973e392d973cac8b", "1_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "1_prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "1_output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why do the machines allow/initiate the building of a new Zion? In the Matrix Reloaded, the Architect says:\n\nThe function of the One is now to return to the Source, allowing a temporary dissemination of the code you carry, reinserting the prime program. After which, you will be required to select from the Matrix 23 individuals - 16 female, 7 male - to rebuild Zion. Failure to comply with this process will result in a cataclysmic system crash, killing everyone connected to the Matrix, which, coupled with the extermination of Zion, will ultimately result in the extinction of the entire human race.\n\nWhy do the machines initiate the re-building of Zion?\n\nA: As was discussed elsewhere on the site, the machines are not interested in humans being wiped out, they (as shown in Animatrix) just want to co-exist with humans.\nAs such, the machines allow the building of new Zion so that humans would not - as the quote you provided says - would not go extinct.\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844860.1461, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "d14034cbfacc4c1eaa7ba268f880cbb1", "0_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "0_prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "0_output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "Encyclopedia Galactica\n\nLater instances in fiction Various authors have invoked the Encyclopedia Galactica in both science and science fiction. The first may have been author Frank Holby's short story \"The Strange Case of the Missing Hero\" in the July 1942 issue of Astounding Science Fiction which featured Sebastian Lelong, editor of the Encyclopedia. It was also a common fixture in previous incarnations of the Legion of Super-Heroes comic books, and has appeared in the Star Wars expanded universe and Superman comics set in the future.  The \"Encyclopedia Galactica\" was also mentioned as being a collection of all the knowledge of a galactic Empire in the 1989 science fiction short story \"The Originist\" by American novelist Orson Scott Card, and took place in Isaac Asimov's fictional \"Foundation\" Universe.\nIn the comic science fiction series by Douglas Adams, the Galactica is frequently contrasted with the apparently more popular Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:\nRobert A. Heinlein mentioned the Encyclopedia in chapter three of To Sail Beyond the Sunset (1987): \"... the computer that led the Lunar Revolution on time line three, code 'Neil Armstrong.' Let's skip the details; it's all in Encyclopedia Galacta (sic) and other books.\"\nIn Arthur C. Clarke's and Gentry Lee's novel Rama II (1989), Nicole des Jardins says to Richard Wakefield, \"Just think, the sum of everything all human beings know or have ever known might be nothing more than an infinitesimal fraction of the Encyclopedia Galactica.\"\n\"Encyclopedia Galactica\" is mentioned by Charlie Sheen's character in The Arrival (1996), and by Jodie Foster's character in Contact (1997)."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "0357d853db504460b939bfec316cb7ea", "1_model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "1_prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "1_output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "Encyclopedia Galactica\n\nLater instances in fiction Various authors have invoked the Encyclopedia Galactica in both science and science fiction. The first may have been author Frank Holby's short story \"The Strange Case of the Missing Hero\" in the July 1942 issue of Astounding Science Fiction which featured Sebastian Lelong, editor of the Encyclopedia. It was also a common fixture in previous incarnations of the Legion of Super-Heroes comic books, and has appeared in the Star Wars expanded universe and Superman comics set in the future.  The \"Encyclopedia Galactica\" was also mentioned as being a collection of all the knowledge of a galactic Empire in the 1989 science fiction short story \"The Originist\" by American novelist Orson Scott Card, and took place in Isaac Asimov's fictional \"Foundation\" Universe.\nIn the comic science fiction series by Douglas Adams, the Galactica is frequently contrasted with the apparently more popular Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:\nRobert A. Heinlein mentioned the Encyclopedia in chapter three of To Sail Beyond the Sunset (1987): \"... the computer that led the Lunar Revolution on time line three, code 'Neil Armstrong.' Let's skip the details; it's all in Encyclopedia Galacta (sic) and other books.\"\nIn Arthur C. Clarke's and Gentry Lee's novel Rama II (1989), Nicole des Jardins says to Richard Wakefield, \"Just think, the sum of everything all human beings know or have ever known might be nothing more than an infinitesimal fraction of the Encyclopedia Galactica.\"\n\"Encyclopedia Galactica\" is mentioned by Charlie Sheen's character in The Arrival (1996), and by Jodie Foster's character in Contact (1997)."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}

data/retrieval_individual-3c73e733-b3f5-49ee-809f-5dd8857c42b8.jsonl

@@ -53,3 +53,15 @@
 {"tstamp": 1728844606.2685, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844604.4191, "finish": 1728844606.2685, "ip": "", "conv_id": "4ef9e9b1bc71482eb11dc10533d2d421", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "output": [["What's the purpose of `if __name__ == '__main__'`?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What is the purpose of __name__? What does __name__ do? I have only seen it paired with __main__ and nothing else.\nI know that the classic if __name__ == __main__: defines the behavior when acting as a package vs running as stand-alone.\nHowever what other usages are there for __name__?\n\nA: __name__ is \"__main__\" if you're executing the script directly. If you're importing a module, __name__ is the name of the module.\nfoo.py:\nprint(__name__)\n\nbar.py \nimport foo\n\nRun the scripts:\n$ python foo.py\n__main__\n$ python bar.py \nfoo\n\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1728844686.4475, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844684.2875, "finish": 1728844686.4475, "ip": "", "conv_id": "6503d527b2674859b39a0e67bfe4c5cd", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1728844686.4475, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844684.2875, "finish": 1728844686.4475, "ip": "", "conv_id": "91c93825dd9d447cb85315ce721872c5", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "History of robots\n\nIt features a female humanoid automaton standing by a basin filled with water.When the user pulls the lever, the water drains and the female automaton refills the basin. Furthermore, he created a robotic musical band. According to Mark Rosheim, unlike Greek designs Arab automata worked with dramatic illusion and manipulated the human perception for practical application. The segmental gears described in The Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices, published by Al-Jazari shortly before his death in 1206, appeared 100 years later in the most advanced European clocks. Al-Jazari also published instructions on the construction of humanoid automata. The first water clocks modeled on Arabic designs were constructed in Europe about 1000 CE, possibly on the basis of the information that was transmitted during Muslim-Christian contact in Sicily and Spain. Among the first recorded European water clocks is that of Gerbert of Aurillac, built in 985 CE. Hero's works on automata were translated into Latin amid the 12th century Renaissance. The early 13th-century artist-engineer Villard de Honnecourt sketched plans for several automata. "]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844720.0406, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844717.56, "finish": 1728844720.0406, "ip": "", "conv_id": "65a08f5050e24a38ab32472ed40be417", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "output": [["Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "Habitable zone\n\nK2-18b is an exoplanet 124 light-years away, orbiting in the habitable zone of the K2-18, a red dwarf. This planet is significant for water vapor found in its atmosphere; this was announced on September 17, 2019.\nIn September 2020, astronomers identified 24 superhabitable planet (planets better than Earth) contenders, from among more than 4000 confirmed exoplanets at present, based on astrophysical parameters, as well as the natural history of known life forms on the Earth.\nHabitability outside the HZ\nLiquid-water environments have been found to exist in the absence of atmospheric pressure and at temperatures outside the HZ temperature range. For example, Saturn's moons Titan and Enceladus and Jupiter's moons Europa and Ganymede, all of which are outside the habitable zone, may hold large volumes of liquid water in subsurface oceans.\nOutside the HZ, tidal heating and radioactive decay are two possible heat sources that could contribute to the existence of liquid water. Abbot and Switzer (2011) put forward the possibility that subsurface water could exist on rogue planets as a result of radioactive decay-based heating and insulation by a thick surface layer of ice.\nWith some theorising that life on Earth may have actually originated in stable, subsurface habitats, it has been suggested that it may be common for wet subsurface extraterrestrial habitats such as these to 'teem with life'. On Earth itself, living organisms may be found more than  below the surface."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844720.0406, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844717.56, "finish": 1728844720.0406, "ip": "", "conv_id": "2d660695adcb48cf8b11f9c9c3a41817", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": "Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "output": [["Find me a planet near α 23h 06m 29.368s and δ −05° 02′ 29.04″ that could be habitable.", "Alpha Centauri\n\nIn 2009, computer simulations showed that a planet might have been able to form near the inner edge of Alpha Centauri B's habitable zone, which extends from  from the star. Certain special assumptions, such as considering that the Alpha Centauri pair may have initially formed with a wider separation and later moved closer to each other (as might be possible if they formed in a dense star cluster), would permit an accretion-friendly environment farther from the star. Bodies around Alpha Centauri A would be able to orbit at slightly farther distances due to its stronger gravity. In addition, the lack of any brown dwarfs or gas giants in close orbits around Alpha Centauri make the likelihood of terrestrial planets greater than otherwise. A theoretical study indicates that a radial velocity analysis might detect a hypothetical planet of  in Alpha Centauri B's habitable zone.\nRadial velocity measurements of Alpha Centauri B made with the High Accuracy Radial Velocity Planet Searcher spectrograph were sufficiently sensitive to detect a  planet within the habitable zone of the star (i.e. with an orbital period P = 200 days), but no planets were detected.\nCurrent estimates place the probability of finding an Earth-like planet around Alpha Centauri at roughly 75%. The observational thresholds for planet detection in the habitable zones by the radial velocity method are currently (2017) estimated to be about  for Alpha Centauri A,  for Alpha Centauri B, and  for Proxima Centauri.\nEarly computer-generated models of planetary formation predicted the existence of terrestrial planets around both Alpha Centauri A and B, but most recent numerical investigations have shown that the gravitational pull of the companion star renders the accretion of planets difficult. Despite these difficulties, given the similarities to the Sun in spectral types, star type, age and probable stability of the orbits, it has been suggested that this stellar system could hold one of the best possibilities for harbouring extraterrestrial life on a potential planet."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844802.6763, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844802.2534, "finish": 1728844802.6763, "ip": "", "conv_id": "23a8b784dbd24d8889e76a061e4e08f1", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why do the machines allow/initiate the building of a new Zion? In the Matrix Reloaded, the Architect says:\n\nThe function of the One is now to return to the Source, allowing a temporary dissemination of the code you carry, reinserting the prime program. After which, you will be required to select from the Matrix 23 individuals - 16 female, 7 male - to rebuild Zion. Failure to comply with this process will result in a cataclysmic system crash, killing everyone connected to the Matrix, which, coupled with the extermination of Zion, will ultimately result in the extinction of the entire human race.\n\nWhy do the machines initiate the re-building of Zion?\n\nA: As was discussed elsewhere on the site, the machines are not interested in humans being wiped out, they (as shown in Animatrix) just want to co-exist with humans.\nAs such, the machines allow the building of new Zion so that humans would not - as the quote you provided says - would not go extinct.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844802.6763, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844802.2534, "finish": 1728844802.6763, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d17a7716687f4121973e392d973cac8b", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why do the machines allow/initiate the building of a new Zion? In the Matrix Reloaded, the Architect says:\n\nThe function of the One is now to return to the Source, allowing a temporary dissemination of the code you carry, reinserting the prime program. After which, you will be required to select from the Matrix 23 individuals - 16 female, 7 male - to rebuild Zion. Failure to comply with this process will result in a cataclysmic system crash, killing everyone connected to the Matrix, which, coupled with the extermination of Zion, will ultimately result in the extinction of the entire human race.\n\nWhy do the machines initiate the re-building of Zion?\n\nA: As was discussed elsewhere on the site, the machines are not interested in humans being wiped out, they (as shown in Animatrix) just want to co-exist with humans.\nAs such, the machines allow the building of new Zion so that humans would not - as the quote you provided says - would not go extinct.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844851.7891, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844849.479, "finish": 1728844851.7891, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d14034cbfacc4c1eaa7ba268f880cbb1", "model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "Encyclopedia Galactica\n\nLater instances in fiction Various authors have invoked the Encyclopedia Galactica in both science and science fiction. The first may have been author Frank Holby's short story \"The Strange Case of the Missing Hero\" in the July 1942 issue of Astounding Science Fiction which featured Sebastian Lelong, editor of the Encyclopedia. It was also a common fixture in previous incarnations of the Legion of Super-Heroes comic books, and has appeared in the Star Wars expanded universe and Superman comics set in the future.  The \"Encyclopedia Galactica\" was also mentioned as being a collection of all the knowledge of a galactic Empire in the 1989 science fiction short story \"The Originist\" by American novelist Orson Scott Card, and took place in Isaac Asimov's fictional \"Foundation\" Universe.\nIn the comic science fiction series by Douglas Adams, the Galactica is frequently contrasted with the apparently more popular Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:\nRobert A. Heinlein mentioned the Encyclopedia in chapter three of To Sail Beyond the Sunset (1987): \"... the computer that led the Lunar Revolution on time line three, code 'Neil Armstrong.' Let's skip the details; it's all in Encyclopedia Galacta (sic) and other books.\"\nIn Arthur C. Clarke's and Gentry Lee's novel Rama II (1989), Nicole des Jardins says to Richard Wakefield, \"Just think, the sum of everything all human beings know or have ever known might be nothing more than an infinitesimal fraction of the Encyclopedia Galactica.\"\n\"Encyclopedia Galactica\" is mentioned by Charlie Sheen's character in The Arrival (1996), and by Jodie Foster's character in Contact (1997)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844851.7891, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844849.479, "finish": 1728844851.7891, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0357d853db504460b939bfec316cb7ea", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "Encyclopedia Galactica\n\nLater instances in fiction Various authors have invoked the Encyclopedia Galactica in both science and science fiction. The first may have been author Frank Holby's short story \"The Strange Case of the Missing Hero\" in the July 1942 issue of Astounding Science Fiction which featured Sebastian Lelong, editor of the Encyclopedia. It was also a common fixture in previous incarnations of the Legion of Super-Heroes comic books, and has appeared in the Star Wars expanded universe and Superman comics set in the future.  The \"Encyclopedia Galactica\" was also mentioned as being a collection of all the knowledge of a galactic Empire in the 1989 science fiction short story \"The Originist\" by American novelist Orson Scott Card, and took place in Isaac Asimov's fictional \"Foundation\" Universe.\nIn the comic science fiction series by Douglas Adams, the Galactica is frequently contrasted with the apparently more popular Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:\nRobert A. Heinlein mentioned the Encyclopedia in chapter three of To Sail Beyond the Sunset (1987): \"... the computer that led the Lunar Revolution on time line three, code 'Neil Armstrong.' Let's skip the details; it's all in Encyclopedia Galacta (sic) and other books.\"\nIn Arthur C. Clarke's and Gentry Lee's novel Rama II (1989), Nicole des Jardins says to Richard Wakefield, \"Just think, the sum of everything all human beings know or have ever known might be nothing more than an infinitesimal fraction of the Encyclopedia Galactica.\"\n\"Encyclopedia Galactica\" is mentioned by Charlie Sheen's character in The Arrival (1996), and by Jodie Foster's character in Contact (1997)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844898.8047, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844898.4591, "finish": 1728844898.8047, "ip": "", "conv_id": "bc53a800564c4920a1a1c4a9179c35f5", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844898.8047, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844898.4591, "finish": 1728844898.8047, "ip": "", "conv_id": "a62f778646614104819efa5ca1c86ab2", "model_name": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844938.0752, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844937.6213, "finish": 1728844938.0752, "ip": "", "conv_id": "9b4e465afd994223b32c64a544f546a2", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844938.0752, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844937.6213, "finish": 1728844938.0752, "ip": "", "conv_id": "b28a280b6cbc4ec2b8df1f5e115b56fd", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844964.6936, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844964.3743, "finish": 1728844964.6936, "ip": "", "conv_id": "60bd65161ecc440484419872caa91f57", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (fictional)\n\nInspiration Adams conceived of the Guide while hitchhiking from London to Istanbul in 1971. Drunk and penniless in a field in Innsbruck, Austria, Adams looked up at the stars and then at his stolen copy of Hitch-hiker's Guide to Europe and thought that someone should write The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. The Hitch-hiker's Guide to Europe claimed in its introduction that it was possible to survive in Europe on less than US$25 a week, a claim echoed in the catchphrase of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy that it was the best source of advice for those who wanted to see the universe \"on less than 30 Altairian dollars a day.\"\nIn reality\nDouglas Adams, who was deeply involved with computer technology, founded the website h2g2 in 1999. In keeping with the Hitchhiker's Guides tradition of being edited by random people off the street, h2g2 is an encyclopedia edited by thousands of contributors.  The site's creation predates Wikipedia by two years, though several commentators have noted the similarities between Wikipedia and the Hitchhiker's Guide, particularly its wild variance in reliability and quality and its tendency to focus on topics of interest to its writers.\nIn 2000 Adams wrote:\nSome have compared Apple's iPad and Amazon's Kindle to the Hitchhiker's Guide; indeed fans have designed \"Don't Panic\" covers for both.\nCombining tablets or e-readers with Wikipedia is often considered the closest existing equivalent to the Hitchhiker's Guide to date. An app for the iPad allows users to read Guide entries as they appeared in the various Hitchhikers media."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844964.6936, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1728844964.3743, "finish": 1728844964.6936, "ip": "", "conv_id": "33aa08f4db1f4883938e35ef75ef77a0", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "Encyclopedia Galactica\n\nThe Orion's Arm worldbuilding project uses a fictional database called the Encyclopaedia Galactica as its primary framing device, each page presenting itself as an individual article of the Encyclopaedia and focusing on a specific aspect of the Orion's Arm universe.\nOther uses\nThere was a series of five video documentaries in 1993, collectively called Encyclopædia Galactica, with the episode titles “The Inner Solar System”, “The Outer Solar System”, “Star Trekking”, “Discovery”, and “Astronomy and the Stars”. The videos were produced by York Films of England and distributed by Encyclopædia Britannica (Australia). Other entities associated with the production of the video series were Encyclopædia Britannica Educational Corporation, The Learning Channel (retitled Amazing Space), The Discovery Channel Europe, S4C Wales, System TV France and Yleisradio Finland.\nThere was an Encyclopedia Galactica: from the Fleet Library aboard the Battlestar Galactica published in 1978. Aimed at a juvenile audience, this was a tie in to the Battlestar Galactica television series being broadcast at the time.\nThe term has been used in non-fictional contexts as well. One example is its use by Carl Sagan (1934–1996) in his 1980 book Cosmos, and the 12th episode of his documentary of the same name, to refer to a text where hypothetical extraterrestrial civilizations could store all of their information and knowledge."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}

data/retrieval_side_by_side-3c73e733-b3f5-49ee-809f-5dd8857c42b8.jsonl

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+{"tstamp": 1728844915.8411, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct"], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "bc53a800564c4920a1a1c4a9179c35f5", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "a62f778646614104819efa5ca1c86ab2", "1_model_name": "Alibaba-NLP/gte-Qwen2-7B-instruct", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844946.5387, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "voyage-multilingual-2"], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "9b4e465afd994223b32c64a544f546a2", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "b28a280b6cbc4ec2b8df1f5e115b56fd", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1728844979.1969, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "voyage-multilingual-2"], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "60bd65161ecc440484419872caa91f57", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "0_output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (fictional)\n\nInspiration Adams conceived of the Guide while hitchhiking from London to Istanbul in 1971. Drunk and penniless in a field in Innsbruck, Austria, Adams looked up at the stars and then at his stolen copy of Hitch-hiker's Guide to Europe and thought that someone should write The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. The Hitch-hiker's Guide to Europe claimed in its introduction that it was possible to survive in Europe on less than US$25 a week, a claim echoed in the catchphrase of the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy that it was the best source of advice for those who wanted to see the universe \"on less than 30 Altairian dollars a day.\"\nIn reality\nDouglas Adams, who was deeply involved with computer technology, founded the website h2g2 in 1999. In keeping with the Hitchhiker's Guides tradition of being edited by random people off the street, h2g2 is an encyclopedia edited by thousands of contributors.  The site's creation predates Wikipedia by two years, though several commentators have noted the similarities between Wikipedia and the Hitchhiker's Guide, particularly its wild variance in reliability and quality and its tendency to focus on topics of interest to its writers.\nIn 2000 Adams wrote:\nSome have compared Apple's iPad and Amazon's Kindle to the Hitchhiker's Guide; indeed fans have designed \"Don't Panic\" covers for both.\nCombining tablets or e-readers with Wikipedia is often considered the closest existing equivalent to the Hitchhiker's Guide to date. An app for the iPad allows users to read Guide entries as they appeared in the various Hitchhikers media."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "33aa08f4db1f4883938e35ef75ef77a0", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "1_output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "Encyclopedia Galactica\n\nThe Orion's Arm worldbuilding project uses a fictional database called the Encyclopaedia Galactica as its primary framing device, each page presenting itself as an individual article of the Encyclopaedia and focusing on a specific aspect of the Orion's Arm universe.\nOther uses\nThere was a series of five video documentaries in 1993, collectively called Encyclopædia Galactica, with the episode titles “The Inner Solar System”, “The Outer Solar System”, “Star Trekking”, ���Discovery”, and “Astronomy and the Stars”. The videos were produced by York Films of England and distributed by Encyclopædia Britannica (Australia). Other entities associated with the production of the video series were Encyclopædia Britannica Educational Corporation, The Learning Channel (retitled Amazing Space), The Discovery Channel Europe, S4C Wales, System TV France and Yleisradio Finland.\nThere was an Encyclopedia Galactica: from the Fleet Library aboard the Battlestar Galactica published in 1978. Aimed at a juvenile audience, this was a tie in to the Battlestar Galactica television series being broadcast at the time.\nThe term has been used in non-fictional contexts as well. One example is its use by Carl Sagan (1934–1996) in his 1980 book Cosmos, and the 12th episode of his documentary of the same name, to refer to a text where hypothetical extraterrestrial civilizations could store all of their information and knowledge."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}