Scheduled Commit
Browse files
data/retrieval_individual-c7735d29-818a-496e-b0e9-04e1bece8af4.jsonl
CHANGED
@@ -18,3 +18,5 @@
|
|
18 |
{"tstamp": 1733334053.913, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1733334052.6446, "finish": 1733334053.913, "ip": "", "conv_id": "f3959bde19da4e28bfea5b9c591c205f", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": "what does the law of multiple proportions state", "output": [["what does the law of multiple proportions state", "Law of multiple proportions\n\nIn chemistry, the law of multiple proportions states that in compounds which contain two particular chemical elements, the amount of Element A per measure of Element B will differ across these compounds by ratios of small whole numbers. For instance, the ratio of the hydrogen content in methane (CH4) and ethane (C2H6) per measure of carbon is 4:3. This law is also known as Dalton's Law, named after John Dalton, the chemist who first expressed it. The discovery of this pattern led Dalton to develop the modern theory of atoms, as it suggested that the elements combine with each other in multiples of a basic quantity."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
|
19 |
{"tstamp": 1733350202.4804, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1733350199.3674, "finish": 1733350202.4804, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ce06524098cd4255b830151ca8b454ff", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Do the Machines in \"The Matrix\" Adhere to the Three Laws of Robotics? In the \"real world\" of the Matrix, do the machines follow Asimov's Three Rules? Were they even programmed with them?\nEDIT: I realize that killing people goes against the 1st law, but by keeping people in the Matrix (which the machines view as a symbiosis) rather than simply killing off these \"annoying\" creatures, I wonder if the killings can be seen as \"preserving the greater good\" or something along those lines; and thus justify violating the laws.\n\nA: \nA robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a\n human being to come to harm.\nA robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where\n such orders would conflict with the First Law.\nA robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does\n not conflict with the First or Second Laws.\n\nNo, no, and no.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
|
20 |
{"tstamp": 1733350202.4804, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1733350199.3674, "finish": 1733350202.4804, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d244326bb643448a9a3345955d239526", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: What happens to a person after they die in the Matrix? Machines keep humans in the Matrix as they are a source of energy. Why did they make it so that when a human is hurt in the Matrix, they're bodies hurt themselves in real life (in the tank)? If a human dies in the Matrix, do they die in the real world? Or just get flushed out of their tank? Isn't it kind of a waste?\n\nA: The body cannot live without the mind. The machines can't get around that. But nothing is wasted. They liquefy the dead so that they can be fed intravenously to the living.\n\n\n\nJump to 45 seconds for Morpheus' first hand explanation.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
{"tstamp": 1733334053.913, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1733334052.6446, "finish": 1733334053.913, "ip": "", "conv_id": "f3959bde19da4e28bfea5b9c591c205f", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": "what does the law of multiple proportions state", "output": [["what does the law of multiple proportions state", "Law of multiple proportions\n\nIn chemistry, the law of multiple proportions states that in compounds which contain two particular chemical elements, the amount of Element A per measure of Element B will differ across these compounds by ratios of small whole numbers. For instance, the ratio of the hydrogen content in methane (CH4) and ethane (C2H6) per measure of carbon is 4:3. This law is also known as Dalton's Law, named after John Dalton, the chemist who first expressed it. The discovery of this pattern led Dalton to develop the modern theory of atoms, as it suggested that the elements combine with each other in multiples of a basic quantity."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
|
19 |
{"tstamp": 1733350202.4804, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1733350199.3674, "finish": 1733350202.4804, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ce06524098cd4255b830151ca8b454ff", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Do the Machines in \"The Matrix\" Adhere to the Three Laws of Robotics? In the \"real world\" of the Matrix, do the machines follow Asimov's Three Rules? Were they even programmed with them?\nEDIT: I realize that killing people goes against the 1st law, but by keeping people in the Matrix (which the machines view as a symbiosis) rather than simply killing off these \"annoying\" creatures, I wonder if the killings can be seen as \"preserving the greater good\" or something along those lines; and thus justify violating the laws.\n\nA: \nA robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a\n human being to come to harm.\nA robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where\n such orders would conflict with the First Law.\nA robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does\n not conflict with the First or Second Laws.\n\nNo, no, and no.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
|
20 |
{"tstamp": 1733350202.4804, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1733350199.3674, "finish": 1733350202.4804, "ip": "", "conv_id": "d244326bb643448a9a3345955d239526", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: What happens to a person after they die in the Matrix? Machines keep humans in the Matrix as they are a source of energy. Why did they make it so that when a human is hurt in the Matrix, they're bodies hurt themselves in real life (in the tank)? If a human dies in the Matrix, do they die in the real world? Or just get flushed out of their tank? Isn't it kind of a waste?\n\nA: The body cannot live without the mind. The machines can't get around that. But nothing is wasted. They liquefy the dead so that they can be fed intravenously to the living.\n\n\n\nJump to 45 seconds for Morpheus' first hand explanation.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
|
21 |
+
{"tstamp": 1733359675.9309, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1733359675.5165, "finish": 1733359675.9309, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7e907e22fc0a45008039df6a21d7827e", "model_name": "mixedbread-ai/mxbai-embed-large-v1", "prompt": "are ac and dc switches interchangeable?", "output": [["are ac and dc switches interchangeable?", "Electronics Stackexchange\n\nQ: will a circuit breaker designed for 230VAC work for 12VDC? Will a standard home automatic circuit breaker, designed and sold as to work on 230V AC (alternating current), and for example 16A, or 25A etc, will it work (break the circuit if it exceeds the rated amperage) on 12V direct current (DC)?\nIf not, are there any automatic circuit breakers for over-current protection, which work on DC? I mean besides fuses which blow, I want the thing to be reusable with a click, not one-time-use.\n\nA: The key here is AC - alternating current - vs DC - direct current. They are different - AC oscillates while DC doesn't. That means, as the answer above notes, that AC breaks contact easier that DC and DC creates greater arcing across the contacts - AC doesn't to the same degree - use a DC circuit breaker - they are available..... \nSame applies to standard switches. A 230v switch will fail very quickly if used in a DC circuit because of the arcing.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
|
22 |
+
{"tstamp": 1733359675.9309, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "voyage-multilingual-2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1733359675.5165, "finish": 1733359675.9309, "ip": "", "conv_id": "f757b110c1f04dbfab64ab197a4c0aee", "model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "prompt": "are ac and dc switches interchangeable?", "output": [["are ac and dc switches interchangeable?", "Electronics Stackexchange\n\nQ: How are switch ratings determined? As the only functionality of a switch is to interrupt the flow of electricity, it acts like a small resistor right?\nLets say that we have a switch that its max ratings are 3A/250V AC. So if we connect it directly to source it will handle up to 3 A * 250 V = 750 W. If I connect it to 12 V DC will it be able to handle around 60 A? (12 * x = 750 => x=750/12 => x= 62.5) How are the voltage / current ratings determined? Will it be able to handle around 30 A instead of 60? Is there any way to calculate the maximum ratings?\n\nA: When closed, up to 3 A can flow through the switch.\nWhen open, up to 250 V can be blocked by the switch.\nYou cannot multiply these two numbers because they describe different cases.\nWhen used with 12 V, the maximum current still is 3 A.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
|