Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-76c7b5f4-5fbc-4311-bf05-8defcdc1ba4e.jsonl

@@ -74,3 +74,4 @@
 {"tstamp": 1723013882.3361, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "17d54e3cbf9a44e69a1ce6b0a8285f76", "0_model_name": "intfloat/e5-mistral-7b-instruct", "0_prompt": "How do I solve a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube?", "0_output": [["How do I solve a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube?", "Rubik's Cube\n\nIn 2008, Tomas Rokicki lowered that number to 22 moves, and in July 2010, a team of researchers including Rokicki, working with computers provided by Google, proved that the so-called \"God's number\" for Rubik's Cube is 20. This means that all initial configurations can be solved in 20 moves or less, and some (in fact millions) require 20. More generally, it has been shown that an n×n×n Rubik's Cube can be solved optimally in Θ(n2 / log(n)) moves.\nSpeedcubing methods\nA solution commonly used by speedcubers was developed by Jessica Fridrich. This method is called CFOP standing for \"Cross, F2L, OLL, PLL\".  It is similar to the layer-by-layer method but employs the use of a large number of algorithms, especially for orienting and permuting the last layer. The cross is solved first, followed by first layer corners and second layer edges simultaneously, with each corner paired up with a second-layer edge piece, thus completing the first two layers (F2L). This is then followed by orienting the last layer, then permuting the last layer (OLL and PLL respectively). There are a total of 120 algorithms for Fridrich's method, however they are not all required to use the CFOP method. Most dedicated cubers will learn as many of these algorithms as possible, and most advanced cubers know all of them. If a cuber knows every algorithm for OLL they may be described as knowing full OLL. It is the same for PLL and F2L."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "9dc8cdcae3f048c9aaa6eebdd9694e1c", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "1_prompt": "How do I solve a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube?", "1_output": [["How do I solve a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube?", "Rubik's Cube\n\nA now well-known method was developed by Lars Petrus. In this method, a 2×2×2 section is solved first, followed by a 2×2×3, and then the incorrect edges are solved using a three-move algorithm, which eliminates the need for a possible 32-move algorithm later. The principle behind this is that in layer-by-layer, one must constantly break and fix the completed layer(s); the 2×2×2 and 2×2×3 sections allow three or two layers (respectively) to be turned without ruining progress. One of the advantages of this method is that it tends to give solutions in fewer moves. For this reason, the method is also popular for fewest move competitions.\nThe Roux Method, developed by Gilles Roux, is similar to the Petrus method in that it relies on block building rather than layers, but derives from corners-first methods. In Roux, a 3×2×1 block is solved, followed by another 3×2×1 on the opposite side. Next, the corners of the top layer are solved. The cube can then be solved using only moves of the U layer and M slice.\nBeginners' methods\nMost beginner solution methods involve solving the cube one layer at a time (\"layer-by-layer\" method or \"beginner's method\"), using algorithms that preserve what has already been solved. The easiest layer by layer methods require only 3–8 algorithms."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1723013937.9741, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "09af207047f040d3a6f5eecc97de3538", "0_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "0_prompt": "How do I solve a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube?", "0_output": [["How do I solve a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube?", "Math Stackexchange\n\nQ: Can you compute the state of a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube if you only see three adjacent faces? I've learned from How many colors of a Rubik's Cube must be known to locate all? that you need to know a minimum of 17 stickers (spread across all its faces) for a 3x3x3 cube in order to compute its state, but if we just see three full adjacent faces and all the 27 stickers on those faces, can we always compute the cube state considering that the cube is always solvable?\n\nA: No.  To expand on @aschepler's excellent answer, consider\n$$\nF'L'(R^2URUR'U'R'U'R'UR')LF\n$$\n(the sequence in the parenthesis is just a standard edge switch).\nWhat you should have at the end of this algorithm is a cube that you can view from one angle that looks completely solved, but it isn't.\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "a397380963724fc587797870c0fbe369", "1_model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "1_prompt": "How do I solve a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube?", "1_output": [["How do I solve a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube?", "Math Stackexchange\n\nQ: Can you compute the state of a 3x3x3 Rubik's cube if you only see three adjacent faces? I've learned from How many colors of a Rubik's Cube must be known to locate all? that you need to know a minimum of 17 stickers (spread across all its faces) for a 3x3x3 cube in order to compute its state, but if we just see three full adjacent faces and all the 27 stickers on those faces, can we always compute the cube state considering that the cube is always solvable?\n\nA: No.  To expand on @aschepler's excellent answer, consider\n$$\nF'L'(R^2URUR'U'R'U'R'UR')LF\n$$\n(the sequence in the parenthesis is just a standard edge switch).\nWhat you should have at the end of this algorithm is a cube that you can view from one angle that looks completely solved, but it isn't.\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1723016074.8836, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "5b2dfe67d0ba445286e5d44bd675f57f", "0_model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "0_prompt": "Who was John Paul II?", "0_output": [["Who was John Paul II?", "Pope John Paul II\n\nIn his youth, Wojtyła dabbled in stage acting. He graduated with excellent grades from an all-boys high school in Wadowice, Poland, in 1938, soon after which World War II broke out. During the war, to avoid being kidnapped and sent off to a German forced labour camp, he signed up for work in harsh conditions in a quarry. Wojtyła eventually took up acting and developed a love for the profession and participated at a local theatre. The linguistically skilled Wojtyła wanted to study Polish at university. Encouraged by a conversation with Adam Stefan Sapieha, he decided to study theology and become a priest. Eventually, Wojtyła rose to the position of Archbishop of Kraków and then a cardinal, both positions held by his mentor. Wojtyła was elected pope on the third day of the second papal conclave of 1978, and became one of the youngest popes in history. The conclave was called after the death of John Paul I, who served only 33 days as pope. John Paul I had been elected in an August papal conclave to succeed Pope Paul VI. Wojtyła adopted the name of his predecessor in tribute to him.\nJohn Paul II was the first non-Italian pope since Adrian VI in the 16th century, as well as the third-longest-serving pope in history after Pius IX and St. Peter. John Paul II attempted to improve the Catholic Church's relations with Judaism, Islam, and the Eastern Orthodox Church in the spirit of ecumenism, holding atheism as the greatest threat. He maintained the Church's previous positions on such matters as abortion, artificial contraception, the ordination of women, and a celibate clergy, and although he supported the reforms of the Second Vatican Council, he was seen as generally conservative in their interpretation. He put emphasis on family and identity, while questioning consumerism, hedonism and the pursuit of wealth. He was one of the most travelled world leaders in history, visiting 129 countries during his pontificate. As part of his special emphasis on the universal call to holiness, John Paul II beatified 1,344 people, and canonised 483 saints, more than the combined tally of his predecessors during the preceding five centuries. By the time of his death, he had named most of the College of Cardinals, consecrated or co-consecrated many of the world's bishops, and ordained many priests."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "af1bca1ac45c42eba76432da1b2898fa", "1_model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "1_prompt": "Who was John Paul II?", "1_output": [["Who was John Paul II?", "John II of France\n\nThe following year, on 10 September 1355 John and Charles signed the Treaty of Valognes, but this second peace lasted hardly any longer than the first, culminating in a highly dramatic event where, during a banquet on 5 April 1356 at the Royal Castle in Rouen attended by the King's son Charles, Charles II of Navarre, and a number of Norman magnates and notables of the French king burst through the door in full armor, swords in hand, along with his entourage, which included the king's brother Phillip, younger son Louis and cousins, as well as over a hundred fully armed knights waiting outside. John lunged over and grabbed Charles of Navarre shouting, \"let no one move if he does not want to be dead with this sword.\" With John's son, Dauphin Charles, the banquet host, on his knees pleading for him to stop, the King grabbed Navarre by the throat and pulled him out of his chair yelling in his face, \"Traitor, you are not worthy to sit at my son's table!\" He then ordered the arrests of all the guests including Navarre and, in what many considered to be a rash move as well as a political mistake, he had John, the Count of Harcourt and several other Norman lords and notables summarily executed later that night in a yard nearby while he stood watching."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1723017000.891, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "tievote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "7cb3bf784b2a46bca417490e33ec6d47", "0_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "0_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "0_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "6a26b634dd4c43beaf7ca881f5c9669a", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-004", "1_prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "1_output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}

data/retrieval_individual-76c7b5f4-5fbc-4311-bf05-8defcdc1ba4e.jsonl

@@ -309,3 +309,7 @@
 {"tstamp": 1723016031.0412, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1723016028.4314, "finish": 1723016031.0412, "ip": "", "conv_id": "af1bca1ac45c42eba76432da1b2898fa", "model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "prompt": "Who was John Paul II?", "output": [["Who was John Paul II?", "John II of France\n\nThe following year, on 10 September 1355 John and Charles signed the Treaty of Valognes, but this second peace lasted hardly any longer than the first, culminating in a highly dramatic event where, during a banquet on 5 April 1356 at the Royal Castle in Rouen attended by the King's son Charles, Charles II of Navarre, and a number of Norman magnates and notables of the French king burst through the door in full armor, swords in hand, along with his entourage, which included the king's brother Phillip, younger son Louis and cousins, as well as over a hundred fully armed knights waiting outside. John lunged over and grabbed Charles of Navarre shouting, \"let no one move if he does not want to be dead with this sword.\" With John's son, Dauphin Charles, the banquet host, on his knees pleading for him to stop, the King grabbed Navarre by the throat and pulled him out of his chair yelling in his face, \"Traitor, you are not worthy to sit at my son's table!\" He then ordered the arrests of all the guests including Navarre and, in what many considered to be a rash move as well as a political mistake, he had John, the Count of Harcourt and several other Norman lords and notables summarily executed later that night in a yard nearby while he stood watching."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1723016228.4154, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-004", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1723016227.8871, "finish": 1723016228.4154, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7fd3c4100be34b22829a18f3f3a40c13", "model_name": "text-embedding-004", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1723016228.4154, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-3-large", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1723016227.8871, "finish": 1723016228.4154, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0c1af03f7cb24c33974a68157f3ce2b8", "model_name": "text-embedding-3-large", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe test was introduced by Turing in his 1950 paper \"Computing Machinery and Intelligence\" while working at the University of Manchester. It opens with the words: \"I propose to consider the question, 'Can machines think? Because \"thinking\" is difficult to define, Turing chooses to \"replace the question by another, which is closely related to it and is expressed in relatively unambiguous words.\" Turing describes the new form of the problem in terms of a three-person game called the \"imitation game\", in which an interrogator asks questions of a man and a woman in another room in order to determine the correct sex of the two players. Turing's new question is: \"Are there imaginable digital computers which would do well in the imitation game?\" This question, Turing believed, was one that could actually be answered. In the remainder of the paper, he argued against all the major objections to the proposition that \"machines can think\".\nSince Turing introduced his test, it has been both highly influential and widely criticized, and has become an important concept in the philosophy of artificial intelligence. Philosopher John Searle would comment on the Turing test in his Chinese room argument, a thought experiment that stipulates that a machine cannot have a \"mind\", \"understanding\", or \"consciousness\", regardless of how intelligently or human-like the program may make the computer behave. Searle criticizes Turing's test and claims it is insufficient to detect the presence of consciousness.\nHistory"]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1723016987.4012, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1723016985.0596, "finish": 1723016987.4012, "ip": "", "conv_id": "7cb3bf784b2a46bca417490e33ec6d47", "model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1723016987.4012, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "text-embedding-004", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1723016985.0596, "finish": 1723016987.4012, "ip": "", "conv_id": "6a26b634dd4c43beaf7ca881f5c9669a", "model_name": "text-embedding-004", "prompt": "Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "output": [["Which test was devised to determine whether robots can think?", "Turing test\n\nThe Turing test, originally called the imitation game by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour equivalent to, or indistinguishable from, that of a human. Turing proposed that a human evaluator would judge natural language conversations between a human and a machine designed to generate human-like responses. The evaluator would be aware that one of the two partners in conversation was a machine, and all participants would be separated from one another. The conversation would be limited to a text-only channel, such as a computer keyboard and screen, so the result would not depend on the machine's ability to render words as speech. If the evaluator could not reliably tell the machine from the human, the machine would be said to have passed the test. The test results would not depend on the machine's ability to give correct answers to questions, only on how closely its answers resembled those a human would give. Since the Turing test is a test of indistinguishability in performance capacity, the verbal version generalizes naturally to all of human performance capacity, verbal as well as nonverbal (robotic)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
+{"tstamp": 1723017026.514, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1723017026.2986, "finish": 1723017026.514, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0feafadd996d47fbb58be957b70eb590", "model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "prompt": "can a dc switch be used for ac?", "output": [["can a dc switch be used for ac?", "Electronics Stackexchange\n\nQ: Using automotive relay to switch AC I want to use this automotive relay to switch 60VAC, the current max. is 10A. But all its parameters are for DC usage. Can I use it safely to switch AC? It states its \"Max. switching voltage\" is 50VDC, then what about AC? How can I infer the AC parameters?\n\nA: Given that AC voltage is usually measured in RMS, that means the peak voltage you expect to see on your AC line is 60 * sqrt(2) ~= 84.85 V(peak). This is quite a bit higher than the rated 50V(dc) (peak is the same as given voltage for DC), and you could possibly damage the device and the rest of your circuit. \nEDIT: \nI had a another look at the data sheet, and the issue you may run into is that if you select one of the options with a diode (called a freewheel diode, used to prevent reverse voltage spikes when the contacts are opened), it will cause issues as the diode will conduct when the AC voltage goes negative (even with the contacts open).   \nAlso, I'm assuming you are using a DC control current with a AC load current\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1723017026.514, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1723017026.2986, "finish": 1723017026.514, "ip": "", "conv_id": "3d91fce6e0c742d6970519e5cbe41eb0", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "can a dc switch be used for ac?", "output": [["can a dc switch be used for ac?", "Electronics Stackexchange\n\nQ: will a circuit breaker designed for 230VAC work for 12VDC? Will a standard home automatic circuit breaker, designed and sold as to work on 230V AC (alternating current), and for example 16A, or 25A etc, will it work (break the circuit if it exceeds the rated amperage) on 12V direct current (DC)?\nIf not, are there any automatic circuit breakers for over-current protection, which work on DC? I mean besides fuses which blow, I want the thing to be reusable with a click, not one-time-use.\n\nA: The key here is AC - alternating current - vs  DC - direct current.  They are different  - AC oscillates while DC doesn't.  That means, as the answer above notes, that AC breaks contact easier that DC and DC creates greater arcing across the contacts - AC doesn't to the same degree - use a DC circuit breaker - they are available..... \nSame applies to standard switches.  A 230v switch will fail very quickly if used in a DC circuit because of the arcing.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}