Scheduled Commit

data/retrieval_battle-b05ca3f8-c521-4bfc-a840-ff14f8eda5db.jsonl

@@ -163,3 +163,4 @@
 {"tstamp": 1734820295.4209, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "f103cece9b3e4b758a10722dcd87e36e", "0_model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "0_prompt": "Chime hierarchical organization", "0_output": [["Chime hierarchical organization", "Title: Chimera states in hierarchical networks of Van der Pol oscillators\n\nAbstract: Chimera states are complex spatio-temporal patterns that consist of coexisting domains of coherent and incoherent dynamics. We analyse chimera states in networks of Van der Pol oscillators with hierarchical coupling topology. We investigate the stepwise transition from a nonlocal to a hierarchical topology, and propose the network clustering coefficient as a measure to establish a link between the existence of chimera states and the compactness of the initial base pattern of a hierarchical topology; we show that a large clustering coefficient promotes the occurrence of chimeras. Depending on the level of hierarchy and base pattern, we obtain chimera states with different numbers of incoherent domains. We investigate the chimera regimes as a function of coupling strength and nonlinearity parameter of the individual oscillators. The analysis of a network with larger base pattern resulting in larger clustering coefficient reveals two different types of chimera states and highlights the increasing role of amplitude dynamics."]], "0_corpus": "arxiv", "1_conv_id": "7d1727e50db94600a894ae12045b8771", "1_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "1_prompt": "Chime hierarchical organization", "1_output": [["Chime hierarchical organization", "Title: Hierarchical organization versus self-organization\n\nAbstract: In this paper we try to define the difference between hierarchical organization and self-organization. Organization is defined as a structure with a function. So we can define the difference between hierarchical organization and self-organization both on the structure as on the function. In the next two chapters these two definitions are given. For the structure we will use some existing definitions in graph theory, for the function we will use existing theory on (self-)organization. In the third chapter we will look how these two definitions agree. Finally we give a conclusion."]], "1_corpus": "arxiv"}
 {"tstamp": 1734842537.1527, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "rightvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "feb76f5b63ff4afe874966aab2bd01f5", "0_model_name": "BM25", "0_prompt": "Who is Trump?", "0_output": [["Who is Trump?", "Trump derangement syndrome\n\nThe use of the term has been called part of a broader GOP strategy to discredit criticisms of Trump's actions, as a way of \"reframing\" the discussion by suggesting his political opponents are incapable of accurately perceiving the world. However, according to Kathleen Hall Jamieson of Annenberg Public Policy Center, the term could backfire on Trump supporters because people might interpret it to mean that Trump is the one who is \"deranged\", rather than those who criticize him. Some Trump supporters have asserted that he plays a form of \"multi-dimensional chess\" on a mental level his critics cannot comprehend, which they say explains why critics are frustrated and confused by Trump's words and actions. Fox News anchor Bret Baier and former House speaker Paul Ryan have characterized Trump as a \"troll\" who makes controversial statements to see his adversaries' \"heads explode\".\nThe term has been used by journalists critical of Trump to call for restraint. Fareed Zakaria, who urged Americans to vote against Trump calling him a \"cancer on American democracy\", argues that every Trump policy \"cannot axiomatically be wrong, evil and dangerous\". Adam Gopnik, who takes a strong anti-Trump position, responded to these assertions that it is a \"huge and even fatal mistake for liberals (and constitutional conservatives) to respond negatively to every Trump initiative, every Trump policy, and every Trump idea\". Arguing that Trump's opponents must instead recognize that the real problem is \"Deranged Trump Self-Delusion\", Gopnik defined the \"Syndrome\" as President Trump's \"daily spasm of narcissistic gratification and episodic vanity\".\nExamples of use\nSenator Rand Paul has cited the so-called syndrome several times. In a July 16, 2018 interview he said investigators should simply focus on election security and stop \"accusing Trump of collusion with the Russians and all this craziness that's not true\"—accusations which he said were entirely motivated by \"Trump derangement syndrome\"."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "545fcb596cb441aaba96ca500fb037b6", "1_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "1_prompt": "Who is Trump?", "1_output": [["Who is Trump?", "Donald Trump\n\nDonald John Trump (born June 14, 1946) is an American politician, media personality, and businessman who served as the 45th president of the United States from 2017 to 2021.\nTrump received a Bachelor of Science in economics from the University of Pennsylvania in 1968. His father named him president of his real estate business in 1971. Trump renamed it the Trump Organization and reoriented the company toward building and renovating skyscrapers, hotels, casinos, and golf courses. After a series of business failures in the late 1990s, he launched successful side ventures, mostly licensing the Trump name. From 2004 to 2015, he co-produced and hosted the reality television series The Apprentice. He and his businesses have been plaintiffs or defendants in more than 4,000 legal actions, including six business bankruptcies."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1734862881.3114, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "de16e35910414235944ad3645b96159a", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "0_output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why do the machines allow/initiate the building of a new Zion? In the Matrix Reloaded, the Architect says:\n\nThe function of the One is now to return to the Source, allowing a temporary dissemination of the code you carry, reinserting the prime program. After which, you will be required to select from the Matrix 23 individuals - 16 female, 7 male - to rebuild Zion. Failure to comply with this process will result in a cataclysmic system crash, killing everyone connected to the Matrix, which, coupled with the extermination of Zion, will ultimately result in the extinction of the entire human race.\n\nWhy do the machines initiate the re-building of Zion?\n\nA: As was discussed elsewhere on the site, the machines are not interested in humans being wiped out, they (as shown in Animatrix) just want to co-exist with humans.\nAs such, the machines allow the building of new Zion so that humans would not - as the quote you provided says - would not go extinct.\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "43b0b9310cc84f638f8874d7dc4aae94", "1_model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "1_prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "1_output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1734876467.4933, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "12cf7e5917fa4d1aa6a92e0e59f60521", "0_model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "0_prompt": "are all otg cable the same?", "0_output": [["are all otg cable the same?", "Serverfault Stackexchange\n\nQ: Is 10Gbps fiber (aqua or teal clad) backwards compatible with 4Gbps/8Gbps (normally orange clad fiber) FC equipment? Just like the subject says.\nI've got a mess of FC hardware in a rack that I'd like to replace the cabling on.  Looking at Monoprice I see that LC/LC cables are really close in price between 10Gb and \"normal\" ($9.18 for a 1m 10Gb, $8.91 for a 1m \"normal\").  Is there any reason I shouldn't buy the aqua-colored stuff for future use?\n\nA: Orange cable meets the OM2 standard. Aqua meets OM3 or OM4 standards (usually OM3). Yellow is singlemode cable.\nThe OM standards are backward compatible (for the most part; OM1 was defined to be 62.5/125 size; OM2+ are 50/125; but not all manufacturers followed this, just be sure to get the size that matches your equipment or you'll experience some attenuation).\n"]], "0_corpus": "stackexchange", "1_conv_id": "044690438a5b44fcaf5408c0b10543d5", "1_model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "1_prompt": "are all otg cable the same?", "1_output": [["are all otg cable the same?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What is the best way to exit and handle a fatal error in Objective-C? Let's say my app does something unrecoverable (this never happens, right? :P ). Should I use exit()? Should I use NSAssert(false, @\"Foo\")? Should I throw something somehow? Hard answer to google for.\n\nA: I don't think you should force quit your app if something bad happens as it is annoying for the user - they won't have a clue about what went wrong. Also, Apple are likely to reject your app if this is a common enough occurrence.\nInstead you should pop up a dialog to say what went wrong (eg error writing to database, please try again). \nIf your app can end up in a state where it is totally broken, you should re-design your app. Could you give an example of something \"unrecoverable\"?\n"]], "1_corpus": "stackexchange"}

data/retrieval_individual-b05ca3f8-c521-4bfc-a840-ff14f8eda5db.jsonl

@@ -576,3 +576,5 @@
 {"tstamp": 1734852516.644, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1734852514.4537, "finish": 1734852516.644, "ip": "", "conv_id": "5f93de91cfaa41e38c0ddfed1f39d625", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": "do you have any b/g content", "output": [["do you have any b/g content", "Digital content\n\nDigital content is any content that exists in the form of digital data. Digital content is stored on digital media or analog storage in specific formats. Forms of digital content include information that is digitally broadcast, streamed, or contained in computer files. Viewed narrowly, digital content includes popular media types, while a broader approach considers any type of digital information (e. g. digitally updated weather forecasts, GPS maps, and so on) as digital content.\nDigital content has increased as more households have accessed the Internet. Expanded access has made it easier for people to receive their news and watch TV online, challenging the popularity of traditional platforms. Increased access to the Internet has also led to the mass publication of digital content through individuals in the form of eBooks, blog posts, and even Facebook posts.\nHistory\nAt the beginning of the Digital Revolution, computers facilitated the discovery, retrieval, and creation of new information in every field of human knowledge. As information became increasingly more accessible, the Digital Revolution also facilitated the creation of digital content. Despite an evolution to digital technology, which occurred somewhere between the late 1970s, distribution of digital content did not begin until the late 1990s with the rise in popularity of the Internet.\nIn the past, digital content was primarily distributed through computers and the Internet. Methods of distribution are rapidly changing as the Digital Revolution brings new channels, such as mobile apps and eBooks. These new technologies will create challenges for content creators, as they determine the best channel to bring content to their consumers."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
 {"tstamp": 1734862856.4785, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1734862856.206, "finish": 1734862856.4785, "ip": "", "conv_id": "de16e35910414235944ad3645b96159a", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why do the machines allow/initiate the building of a new Zion? In the Matrix Reloaded, the Architect says:\n\nThe function of the One is now to return to the Source, allowing a temporary dissemination of the code you carry, reinserting the prime program. After which, you will be required to select from the Matrix 23 individuals - 16 female, 7 male - to rebuild Zion. Failure to comply with this process will result in a cataclysmic system crash, killing everyone connected to the Matrix, which, coupled with the extermination of Zion, will ultimately result in the extinction of the entire human race.\n\nWhy do the machines initiate the re-building of Zion?\n\nA: As was discussed elsewhere on the site, the machines are not interested in humans being wiped out, they (as shown in Animatrix) just want to co-exist with humans.\nAs such, the machines allow the building of new Zion so that humans would not - as the quote you provided says - would not go extinct.\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
 {"tstamp": 1734862856.4785, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1734862856.206, "finish": 1734862856.4785, "ip": "", "conv_id": "43b0b9310cc84f638f8874d7dc4aae94", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "output": [["Why did the machines in The Matrix keep humans around?", "Scifi Stackexchange\n\nQ: Why use full brained humans as batteries? \nPossible Duplicate:\nIs the basic premise of humans as a power source in The Matrix reasonable?\nWhy Did the Machines Even Bother With a Matrix? \n\nThe machines in The Matrix series use humans as batteries. That's OK. But why did the machines not alter their livestock such that the matrix itself would be unnecessary?  \nConsider the recently proposed headless chicken farm. Something similar for the human batteries would seem to be an ideal solution for logical machines. No longer would they need to spend resources maintaining a virtual reality for their batteries. The energy, physical hardware and programs running the matrix could then be put to who knows what other uses.\n\nA: The explanation for the use of human brains would seem to be the fact that our complex thoughts lead to higher level of brain activity, thus resulting in exponentially more synapses firing (i.e. more electrical activity to harvest).\nThat makes human brains far more efficient than the brains of animals, even with the overhead of maintaining the matrix.  Plus, that movie would have really sucked... dumb cows and chickens revolt against the machines!  ;)\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1734876427.975, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1734876425.7899, "finish": 1734876427.975, "ip": "", "conv_id": "12cf7e5917fa4d1aa6a92e0e59f60521", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "are all otg cable the same?", "output": [["are all otg cable the same?", "Serverfault Stackexchange\n\nQ: Is 10Gbps fiber (aqua or teal clad) backwards compatible with 4Gbps/8Gbps (normally orange clad fiber) FC equipment? Just like the subject says.\nI've got a mess of FC hardware in a rack that I'd like to replace the cabling on.  Looking at Monoprice I see that LC/LC cables are really close in price between 10Gb and \"normal\" ($9.18 for a 1m 10Gb, $8.91 for a 1m \"normal\").  Is there any reason I shouldn't buy the aqua-colored stuff for future use?\n\nA: Orange cable meets the OM2 standard. Aqua meets OM3 or OM4 standards (usually OM3). Yellow is singlemode cable.\nThe OM standards are backward compatible (for the most part; OM1 was defined to be 62.5/125 size; OM2+ are 50/125; but not all manufacturers followed this, just be sure to get the size that matches your equipment or you'll experience some attenuation).\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}
+{"tstamp": 1734876427.975, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1734876425.7899, "finish": 1734876427.975, "ip": "", "conv_id": "044690438a5b44fcaf5408c0b10543d5", "model_name": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2", "prompt": "are all otg cable the same?", "output": [["are all otg cable the same?", "Stackoverflow Stackexchange\n\nQ: What is the best way to exit and handle a fatal error in Objective-C? Let's say my app does something unrecoverable (this never happens, right? :P ). Should I use exit()? Should I use NSAssert(false, @\"Foo\")? Should I throw something somehow? Hard answer to google for.\n\nA: I don't think you should force quit your app if something bad happens as it is annoying for the user - they won't have a clue about what went wrong. Also, Apple are likely to reject your app if this is a common enough occurrence.\nInstead you should pop up a dialog to say what went wrong (eg error writing to database, please try again). \nIf your app can end up in a state where it is totally broken, you should re-design your app. Could you give an example of something \"unrecoverable\"?\n"]], "corpus": "stackexchange"}