Muennighoff commited on
Commit
37667a9
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 84a53f6

Scheduled Commit

Browse files
data/retrieval_battle-2b220830-844b-4128-a00a-03ab29c3b3ac.jsonl CHANGED
@@ -56,3 +56,4 @@
56
  {"tstamp": 1731232281.3498, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "501cc7faee9a4c7a99456b9c5537ca37", "0_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "0_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "0_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "Israel and the United Nations\n\nThe United Nations General Assembly on 15 May 1947 created the Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". UNSCOP was \"to prepare for consideration at the next regular session of the Assembly a report on the question of Palestine.\" UNSCOP consisted of representatives of eleven members: Australia, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, India, Iran, Netherlands, Peru, Sweden, Uruguay and Yugoslavia. In the final report of 3 September 1947, seven members of the Committee in Chapter VI \"expressed themselves, by recorded vote, in favour of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union\" (reproduced in the Report). The Plan proposed \"an independent Arab State, an independent Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem\". The Palestinian Arabs and members of the Arab League had rejected any partition of Palestine.\nOn 29 November 1947, the General Assembly passed Resolution 181 (commonly known as the UN Partition Plan for Palestine) which recommended the adoption and implementation of a slightly modified version of the UNSCOP majority Partition Plan, by 33 votes in favor, 13 against, and 10 abstentions, achieving the required two-thirds majority. The resolution was rejected by the Palestinian Arabs; and all members of the Arab League voted against.\nUN Mediator in Palestine\nWithin a few days of the passing of the Partition Plan (Resolution 181), full scale Jewish–Arab fighting broke out in Palestine. It also led to anti-Jewish violence in Arab countries, and to a Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries. In an attempt to mediate the continuing Jewish–Arab fighting in Palestine, UN General Assembly by Resolution 186 of 14 May 1948 called for the appointment of \"United Nations Mediator in Palestine\".\nAlso on 14 May 1948, the day on which the British Mandate of Palestine was to expire, Israel declared \"the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz Israel, to be known as the State of Israel\". The territory of Israel was to be that of the Jewish State proposed in Resolution 181."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "f768df78cc4941aead3e917981c6ff4d", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "1_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
57
  {"tstamp": 1731232304.6426, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "f31551026e12437fb2594985212aa31d", "0_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "0_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "0_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "b3caf43329ec450199a984b94396c017", "1_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "1_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "1_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
58
  {"tstamp": 1731232397.1921, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "712c429802ab4a5aa443513f32fa90e0", "0_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "0_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNPC) and who were its members. NOTE: United Nations Palestine Commission IS NOT UNSCOP. ", "0_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNPC) and who were its members. NOTE: United Nations Palestine Commission IS NOT UNSCOP. ", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "bfb561f7d15245198196a7b3c95a39c7", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-004", "1_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNPC) and who were its members. NOTE: United Nations Palestine Commission IS NOT UNSCOP. ", "1_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNPC) and who were its members. NOTE: United Nations Palestine Commission IS NOT UNSCOP. ", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
 
 
56
  {"tstamp": 1731232281.3498, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "501cc7faee9a4c7a99456b9c5537ca37", "0_model_name": "BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5", "0_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "0_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "Israel and the United Nations\n\nThe United Nations General Assembly on 15 May 1947 created the Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". UNSCOP was \"to prepare for consideration at the next regular session of the Assembly a report on the question of Palestine.\" UNSCOP consisted of representatives of eleven members: Australia, Canada, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, India, Iran, Netherlands, Peru, Sweden, Uruguay and Yugoslavia. In the final report of 3 September 1947, seven members of the Committee in Chapter VI \"expressed themselves, by recorded vote, in favour of the Plan of Partition with Economic Union\" (reproduced in the Report). The Plan proposed \"an independent Arab State, an independent Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem\". The Palestinian Arabs and members of the Arab League had rejected any partition of Palestine.\nOn 29 November 1947, the General Assembly passed Resolution 181 (commonly known as the UN Partition Plan for Palestine) which recommended the adoption and implementation of a slightly modified version of the UNSCOP majority Partition Plan, by 33 votes in favor, 13 against, and 10 abstentions, achieving the required two-thirds majority. The resolution was rejected by the Palestinian Arabs; and all members of the Arab League voted against.\nUN Mediator in Palestine\nWithin a few days of the passing of the Partition Plan (Resolution 181), full scale Jewish–Arab fighting broke out in Palestine. It also led to anti-Jewish violence in Arab countries, and to a Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries. In an attempt to mediate the continuing Jewish–Arab fighting in Palestine, UN General Assembly by Resolution 186 of 14 May 1948 called for the appointment of \"United Nations Mediator in Palestine\".\nAlso on 14 May 1948, the day on which the British Mandate of Palestine was to expire, Israel declared \"the establishment of a Jewish state in Eretz Israel, to be known as the State of Israel\". The territory of Israel was to be that of the Jewish State proposed in Resolution 181."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "f768df78cc4941aead3e917981c6ff4d", "1_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "1_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "1_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
57
  {"tstamp": 1731232304.6426, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "f31551026e12437fb2594985212aa31d", "0_model_name": "Salesforce/SFR-Embedding-2_R", "0_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "0_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "b3caf43329ec450199a984b94396c017", "1_model_name": "embed-english-v3.0", "1_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "1_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNOC) and who were its members", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
58
  {"tstamp": 1731232397.1921, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "bothbadvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "712c429802ab4a5aa443513f32fa90e0", "0_model_name": "voyage-multilingual-2", "0_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNPC) and who were its members. NOTE: United Nations Palestine Commission IS NOT UNSCOP. ", "0_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNPC) and who were its members. NOTE: United Nations Palestine Commission IS NOT UNSCOP. ", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "bfb561f7d15245198196a7b3c95a39c7", "1_model_name": "text-embedding-004", "1_prompt": "What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNPC) and who were its members. NOTE: United Nations Palestine Commission IS NOT UNSCOP. ", "1_output": [["What was the United Nations Palestine Commission (UNPC) and who were its members. NOTE: United Nations Palestine Commission IS NOT UNSCOP. ", "United Nations Special Committee on Palestine\n\nThe United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was created on 15 May 1947 in response to a United Kingdom government request that the General Assembly \"make recommendations under article 10 of the Charter, concerning the future government of Palestine\". The British government had also recommended the establishment of a special committee to prepare a report for the General Assembly. The General Assembly adopted the recommendation to set up the UNSCOP to investigate the cause of the conflict in Palestine, and, if possible, devise a solution. UNSCOP was made up of representatives of 11 countries. UNSCOP visited Palestine and gathered testimony from Zionist organisations in Palestine and in the US. The Arab Higher Committee boycotted the commission, explaining that the Palestinian Arabs' natural rights were self-evident and could not continue to be subject to investigation, but rather deserved to be recognized on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
59
+ {"tstamp": 1731251548.2626, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "leftvote", "models": ["", ""], "ip": "", "0_conv_id": "8a3518b196f94975a2bf45afd5306b80", "0_model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "0_prompt": "what are the latest works of Jennifer Doudna?", "0_output": [["what are the latest works of Jennifer Doudna?", "Jennifer Doudna\n\nIn 2012, Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier were the first to propose that CRISPR-Cas9 (enzymes from bacteria that control microbial immunity) could be used for programmable editing of genomes, which has been called one of the most significant discoveries in the history of biology. Since then, Doudna has been a leading figure in what is referred to as the \"CRISPR revolution\" for her fundamental work and leadership in developing CRISPR-mediated genome editing.\nHer many other awards and fellowships include the 2000 Alan T. Waterman Award for her research on the structure of a ribozyme, as determined by X-ray crystallography and the 2015 Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology, with Charpentier. She has been a co-recipient of the Gruber Prize in Genetics (2015), the Tang Prize (2016), the Canada Gairdner International Award (2016), and the Japan Prize (2017). She was named one of the Time 100 most influential people in 2015, and in 2023 was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame.\nEarly life and education\nJennifer Doudna was born February 19, 1964, in Washington, D.C., as the daughter of Dorothy Jane (Williams) and Martin Kirk Doudna. Her father received his PhD in English literature from the University of Michigan, and her mother held a master's degree in education. When Doudna was seven years old, the family moved to Hawaii so her father could accept a teaching position in American literature at the University of Hawaii at Hilo. Doudna's mother earned a second master's degree in Asian history from the university and taught history at a local community college."]], "0_corpus": "wikipedia", "1_conv_id": "ad3ad3992e1c4e219c423639054e18ea", "1_model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "1_prompt": "what are the latest works of Jennifer Doudna?", "1_output": [["what are the latest works of Jennifer Doudna?", "Jennifer Doudna\n\nJennifer Anne Doudna (; born February 19, 1964) is an American biochemist who has pioneered work in CRISPR gene editing, and made other fundamental contributions in biochemistry and genetics. Doudna was one of the first women to share a Nobel in the sciences. She received the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, with Emmanuelle Charpentier, \"for the development of a method for genome editing.\" She is the Li Ka Shing Chancellor's Chair Professor in the department of chemistry and the department of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley. She has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute since 1997.\nDoudna graduated from Pomona College in 1985 and earned a Ph.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1989. Apart from her professorship at Berkeley, she is also the founder and chair of the governance board of the Innovative Genomics Institute, which she co-founded in 2014. Doudna is also a faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, a senior investigator at the Gladstone Institutes, and an adjunct professor of cellular and molecular pharmacology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)."]], "1_corpus": "wikipedia"}
data/retrieval_individual-2b220830-844b-4128-a00a-03ab29c3b3ac.jsonl CHANGED
@@ -270,3 +270,5 @@
270
  {"tstamp": 1731241137.4737, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731241137.195, "finish": 1731241137.4737, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0166f2dd513d46bd9e9c085b38642f37", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "Encyclopedia Galactica\n\nLater instances in fiction Various authors have invoked the Encyclopedia Galactica in both science and science fiction. The first may have been author Frank Holby's short story \"The Strange Case of the Missing Hero\" in the July 1942 issue of Astounding Science Fiction which featured Sebastian Lelong, editor of the Encyclopedia. It was also a common fixture in previous incarnations of the Legion of Super-Heroes comic books, and has appeared in the Star Wars expanded universe and Superman comics set in the future. The \"Encyclopedia Galactica\" was also mentioned as being a collection of all the knowledge of a galactic Empire in the 1989 science fiction short story \"The Originist\" by American novelist Orson Scott Card, and took place in Isaac Asimov's fictional \"Foundation\" Universe.\nIn the comic science fiction series by Douglas Adams, the Galactica is frequently contrasted with the apparently more popular Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:\nRobert A. Heinlein mentioned the Encyclopedia in chapter three of To Sail Beyond the Sunset (1987): \"... the computer that led the Lunar Revolution on time line three, code 'Neil Armstrong.' Let's skip the details; it's all in Encyclopedia Galacta (sic) and other books.\"\nIn Arthur C. Clarke's and Gentry Lee's novel Rama II (1989), Nicole des Jardins says to Richard Wakefield, \"Just think, the sum of everything all human beings know or have ever known might be nothing more than an infinitesimal fraction of the Encyclopedia Galactica.\"\n\"Encyclopedia Galactica\" is mentioned by Charlie Sheen's character in The Arrival (1996), and by Jodie Foster's character in Contact (1997)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
271
  {"tstamp": 1731245675.7686, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731245670.7903, "finish": 1731245675.7686, "ip": "", "conv_id": "36318160b8104596be98210a206feb48", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "output": [["I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "Title: Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Training\n\nAbstract: Text embeddings are useful features in many applications such as semantic search and computing text similarity. Previous work typically trains models customized for different use cases, varying in dataset choice, training objective and model architecture. In this work, we show that contrastive pre-training on unsupervised data at scale leads to high quality vector representations of text and code. The same unsupervised text embeddings that achieve new state-of-the-art results in linear-probe classification also display impressive semantic search capabilities and sometimes even perform competitively with fine-tuned models. On linear-probe classification accuracy averaging over 7 tasks, our best unsupervised model achieves a relative improvement of 4% and 1.8% over previous best unsupervised and supervised text embedding models respectively. The same text embeddings when evaluated on large-scale semantic search attains a relative improvement of 23.4%, 14.7%, and 10.6% over previous best unsupervised methods on MSMARCO, Natural Questions and TriviaQA benchmarks, respectively. Similarly to text embeddings, we train code embedding models on (text, code) pairs, obtaining a 20.8% relative improvement over prior best work on code search."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
272
  {"tstamp": 1731245675.7686, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731245670.7903, "finish": 1731245675.7686, "ip": "", "conv_id": "3b5d198baf66499a8535511cddbaa442", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "output": [["I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "Title: MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark\n\nAbstract: Text embeddings are commonly evaluated on a small set of datasets from a single task not covering their possible applications to other tasks. It is unclear whether state-of-the-art embeddings on semantic textual similarity (STS) can be equally well applied to other tasks like clustering or reranking. This makes progress in the field difficult to track, as various models are constantly being proposed without proper evaluation. To solve this problem, we introduce the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB). MTEB spans 8 embedding tasks covering a total of 58 datasets and 112 languages. Through the benchmarking of 33 models on MTEB, we establish the most comprehensive benchmark of text embeddings to date. We find that no particular text embedding method dominates across all tasks. This suggests that the field has yet to converge on a universal text embedding method and scale it up sufficiently to provide state-of-the-art results on all embedding tasks. MTEB comes with open-source code and a public leaderboard at https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
 
 
 
270
  {"tstamp": 1731241137.4737, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731241137.195, "finish": 1731241137.4737, "ip": "", "conv_id": "0166f2dd513d46bd9e9c085b38642f37", "model_name": "GritLM/GritLM-7B", "prompt": "Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "output": [["Who wrote about a guide more popular than the Encyclopedia Galactica?", "Encyclopedia Galactica\n\nLater instances in fiction Various authors have invoked the Encyclopedia Galactica in both science and science fiction. The first may have been author Frank Holby's short story \"The Strange Case of the Missing Hero\" in the July 1942 issue of Astounding Science Fiction which featured Sebastian Lelong, editor of the Encyclopedia. It was also a common fixture in previous incarnations of the Legion of Super-Heroes comic books, and has appeared in the Star Wars expanded universe and Superman comics set in the future. The \"Encyclopedia Galactica\" was also mentioned as being a collection of all the knowledge of a galactic Empire in the 1989 science fiction short story \"The Originist\" by American novelist Orson Scott Card, and took place in Isaac Asimov's fictional \"Foundation\" Universe.\nIn the comic science fiction series by Douglas Adams, the Galactica is frequently contrasted with the apparently more popular Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:\nRobert A. Heinlein mentioned the Encyclopedia in chapter three of To Sail Beyond the Sunset (1987): \"... the computer that led the Lunar Revolution on time line three, code 'Neil Armstrong.' Let's skip the details; it's all in Encyclopedia Galacta (sic) and other books.\"\nIn Arthur C. Clarke's and Gentry Lee's novel Rama II (1989), Nicole des Jardins says to Richard Wakefield, \"Just think, the sum of everything all human beings know or have ever known might be nothing more than an infinitesimal fraction of the Encyclopedia Galactica.\"\n\"Encyclopedia Galactica\" is mentioned by Charlie Sheen's character in The Arrival (1996), and by Jodie Foster's character in Contact (1997)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
271
  {"tstamp": 1731245675.7686, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "BM25", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731245670.7903, "finish": 1731245675.7686, "ip": "", "conv_id": "36318160b8104596be98210a206feb48", "model_name": "BM25", "prompt": "I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "output": [["I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "Title: Text and Code Embeddings by Contrastive Pre-Training\n\nAbstract: Text embeddings are useful features in many applications such as semantic search and computing text similarity. Previous work typically trains models customized for different use cases, varying in dataset choice, training objective and model architecture. In this work, we show that contrastive pre-training on unsupervised data at scale leads to high quality vector representations of text and code. The same unsupervised text embeddings that achieve new state-of-the-art results in linear-probe classification also display impressive semantic search capabilities and sometimes even perform competitively with fine-tuned models. On linear-probe classification accuracy averaging over 7 tasks, our best unsupervised model achieves a relative improvement of 4% and 1.8% over previous best unsupervised and supervised text embedding models respectively. The same text embeddings when evaluated on large-scale semantic search attains a relative improvement of 23.4%, 14.7%, and 10.6% over previous best unsupervised methods on MSMARCO, Natural Questions and TriviaQA benchmarks, respectively. Similarly to text embeddings, we train code embedding models on (text, code) pairs, obtaining a 20.8% relative improvement over prior best work on code search."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
272
  {"tstamp": 1731245675.7686, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731245670.7903, "finish": 1731245675.7686, "ip": "", "conv_id": "3b5d198baf66499a8535511cddbaa442", "model_name": "intfloat/multilingual-e5-large-instruct", "prompt": "I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "output": [["I am searching for a good and large-scale benchmark for testing the performance of text embeddings.", "Title: MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark\n\nAbstract: Text embeddings are commonly evaluated on a small set of datasets from a single task not covering their possible applications to other tasks. It is unclear whether state-of-the-art embeddings on semantic textual similarity (STS) can be equally well applied to other tasks like clustering or reranking. This makes progress in the field difficult to track, as various models are constantly being proposed without proper evaluation. To solve this problem, we introduce the Massive Text Embedding Benchmark (MTEB). MTEB spans 8 embedding tasks covering a total of 58 datasets and 112 languages. Through the benchmarking of 33 models on MTEB, we establish the most comprehensive benchmark of text embeddings to date. We find that no particular text embedding method dominates across all tasks. This suggests that the field has yet to converge on a universal text embedding method and scale it up sufficiently to provide state-of-the-art results on all embedding tasks. MTEB comes with open-source code and a public leaderboard at https://github.com/embeddings-benchmark/mteb."]], "corpus": "arxiv"}
273
+ {"tstamp": 1731251503.0617, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731251500.7664, "finish": 1731251503.0617, "ip": "", "conv_id": "8a3518b196f94975a2bf45afd5306b80", "model_name": "nomic-ai/nomic-embed-text-v1.5", "prompt": "what are the latest works of Jennifer Doudna?", "output": [["what are the latest works of Jennifer Doudna?", "Jennifer Doudna\n\nIn 2012, Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier were the first to propose that CRISPR-Cas9 (enzymes from bacteria that control microbial immunity) could be used for programmable editing of genomes, which has been called one of the most significant discoveries in the history of biology. Since then, Doudna has been a leading figure in what is referred to as the \"CRISPR revolution\" for her fundamental work and leadership in developing CRISPR-mediated genome editing.\nHer many other awards and fellowships include the 2000 Alan T. Waterman Award for her research on the structure of a ribozyme, as determined by X-ray crystallography and the 2015 Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology, with Charpentier. She has been a co-recipient of the Gruber Prize in Genetics (2015), the Tang Prize (2016), the Canada Gairdner International Award (2016), and the Japan Prize (2017). She was named one of the Time 100 most influential people in 2015, and in 2023 was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame.\nEarly life and education\nJennifer Doudna was born February 19, 1964, in Washington, D.C., as the daughter of Dorothy Jane (Williams) and Martin Kirk Doudna. Her father received his PhD in English literature from the University of Michigan, and her mother held a master's degree in education. When Doudna was seven years old, the family moved to Hawaii so her father could accept a teaching position in American literature at the University of Hawaii at Hilo. Doudna's mother earned a second master's degree in Asian history from the university and taught history at a local community college."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}
274
+ {"tstamp": 1731251503.0617, "task_type": "retrieval", "type": "chat", "model": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "gen_params": {}, "start": 1731251500.7664, "finish": 1731251503.0617, "ip": "", "conv_id": "ad3ad3992e1c4e219c423639054e18ea", "model_name": "jinaai/jina-embeddings-v2-base-en", "prompt": "what are the latest works of Jennifer Doudna?", "output": [["what are the latest works of Jennifer Doudna?", "Jennifer Doudna\n\nJennifer Anne Doudna (; born February 19, 1964) is an American biochemist who has pioneered work in CRISPR gene editing, and made other fundamental contributions in biochemistry and genetics. Doudna was one of the first women to share a Nobel in the sciences. She received the 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, with Emmanuelle Charpentier, \"for the development of a method for genome editing.\" She is the Li Ka Shing Chancellor's Chair Professor in the department of chemistry and the department of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley. She has been an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute since 1997.\nDoudna graduated from Pomona College in 1985 and earned a Ph.D. from Harvard Medical School in 1989. Apart from her professorship at Berkeley, she is also the founder and chair of the governance board of the Innovative Genomics Institute, which she co-founded in 2014. Doudna is also a faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, a senior investigator at the Gladstone Institutes, and an adjunct professor of cellular and molecular pharmacology at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF)."]], "corpus": "wikipedia"}