KennethEnevoldsen commited on
Commit
cf95d56
·
unverified ·
1 Parent(s): 5affec7

minor fixes to docs

Browse files
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. data/dannet/dannet.md +8 -7
  2. paper/paper.md +18 -0
data/dannet/dannet.md CHANGED
@@ -73,6 +73,14 @@ An entry in the dataset consists of the following fields:
73
  <!-- END-SAMPLE -->
74
 
75
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
76
 
77
  ## License Information
78
  <details>
@@ -121,13 +129,6 @@ DanNet 2.1 Copyright 2009-12 by University of Copenhagen and Society for Danish
121
  </details>
122
 
123
 
124
- ### Dataset Statistics
125
-
126
- <!-- START-DATASET PLOTS -->
127
- <img src="./images/dist_document_length.png" width="600" style="margin-right: 10px;" />
128
- <img>
129
- <!-- END-DATASET PLOTS -->
130
-
131
 
132
  ## Additional Information
133
 
 
73
  <!-- END-SAMPLE -->
74
 
75
 
76
+ ### Dataset Statistics
77
+
78
+ <!-- START-DATASET PLOTS -->
79
+ <img src="./images/dist_document_length.png" width="600" style="margin-right: 10px;" />
80
+ <img>
81
+ <!-- END-DATASET PLOTS -->
82
+
83
+
84
 
85
  ## License Information
86
  <details>
 
129
  </details>
130
 
131
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
132
 
133
  ## Additional Information
134
 
paper/paper.md CHANGED
@@ -59,6 +59,24 @@ While it is in theory possible to open a PR on existing dataset, this practice i
59
 
60
  Contrasting this approach to code development - where it is common practice to create PRs to continually improve the codebase - makes this dataset development landscape seems immature and inefficent.
61
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
62
  ## What is a Dynaword
63
 
64
  A dynaword is a continously developed dataset resource intended a variety of downstream use-cases within natural language processing. Dynaword does intend to replace existing large scale releases such as fine-web [@fineweb], OSCAR [@OSCAR], or HLPT [@hplt], but rather
 
59
 
60
  Contrasting this approach to code development - where it is common practice to create PRs to continually improve the codebase - makes this dataset development landscape seems immature and inefficent.
61
 
62
+ <!--
63
+ KCE - just some loose thoughts:
64
+
65
+ Over the last couple of years multiple models or dataset released in the Nordics have retracted or not released due to concerns about the data.
66
+ This include the
67
+ - SWEb (https://arxiv.org/html/2410.04456v1) a large scale web-data, which was never released due to the fear of legal disputes.
68
+ - Models from Danish Foundation Models (cite) that was retracted either temporarily (dfm-encoder-large) or permanently (wav2vec model) due to concern from rightholders
69
+ - Similarly, the Norwegian collosus corpus (NCC) (https://huggingface.co/datasets/NbAiLab/NCC) have had to retract a large part of the initial dataset
70
+ following a request from the media houses.
71
+
72
+ Similar situations have happened throughout Europe and it is easy to imagine that more will follow.
73
+
74
+ Building models on uncertain data foundation makes it unclear what
75
+ Derivatives models might are thus presented with a unclear legal status. This may halt implementation or if implemented potentially lead to legal consequences.
76
+
77
+ Danish Dynaword seeks to remedy this issue by ...
78
+ -->
79
+
80
  ## What is a Dynaword
81
 
82
  A dynaword is a continously developed dataset resource intended a variety of downstream use-cases within natural language processing. Dynaword does intend to replace existing large scale releases such as fine-web [@fineweb], OSCAR [@OSCAR], or HLPT [@hplt], but rather