update
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -1,3 +1,38 @@
|
|
1 |
---
|
2 |
license: llama2
|
3 |
-
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
---
|
2 |
license: llama2
|
3 |
+
---
|
4 |
+
|
5 |
+
We have released HSPMATH-7B, a supervised fine-tuning model for MATH.
|
6 |
+
|
7 |
+
We constructed a supervised fine-tuning dataset of 75k samples through a simple yet effective method based on the MetaMathQA dataset.
|
8 |
+
After supervised fine-tuning the Llemma-7B model, we achieved a strong performance of 64.3% on the GSM8K dataset.
|
9 |
+
The dataset construction method involves introducing a hint before the solution. For details, refer to the paper: [Hint-before-Solving Prompting: Guiding LLMs to Effectively Utilize Encoded Knowledge](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.14310.pdf).
|
10 |
+
A comparison of performances with methods of similar model sizes (7B) is shown in the table below:
|
11 |
+
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
| Open-source Model (7B) | GSM8k |
|
14 |
+
|-----------|------------|
|
15 |
+
|MetaMath-Mistral-7B|77.7 |
|
16 |
+
|MetaMath-7B-V1.0| 66.5 |
|
17 |
+
|HSPMATH-7B| **64.3** |
|
18 |
+
|Llemma-7B (SFT)| 58.7 |
|
19 |
+
|WizardMath-7B| 54.9 |
|
20 |
+
|RFT-7B |50.3|
|
21 |
+
|Qwen-7b|47.84
|
22 |
+
|Mistral-7b|37.83 |
|
23 |
+
|Yi-6b| 32.6 |
|
24 |
+
|ChatGLM-6B| 32.4 |
|
25 |
+
|LLaMA2-7b|12.96 |
|
26 |
+
|
27 |
+
|Close-source Model|GSM8k|
|
28 |
+
|-----------|------------|
|
29 |
+
|GPT-3.5 | 57.1 |
|
30 |
+
|PaLM-540B |56.5 |
|
31 |
+
|Minerva-540B |58.8 |
|
32 |
+
|Minerva-62B |52.4 |
|
33 |
+
|Chinchilla-70B |43.7|
|
34 |
+
|
35 |
+
Note:
|
36 |
+
- The MetaMath family models is fine-tuned on 400k samples, which is more than 5.3 times the size of our training set.
|
37 |
+
- Llemma-7B (SFT) and our model HSPMATH-7B are supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on the same dataset but without the Hint texts.
|
38 |
+
- We found that by introducing hints, the SFT model HSPMATH-7B improved by 5.6%.
|